Recombinant Oryza sativa subsp. japonica Probable nucleoredoxin 3 (Os04g0608600, LOC_Os04g51920)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is crucial for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The specific tag type is determined during production. If you require a particular tag, please specify it for preferential development.
Synonyms
Os04g0608600; LOC_Os04g51920; OSJNBa0060N03.13; Probable nucleoredoxin 3; OsNrx3; EC 1.8.1.8
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-471
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Oryza sativa subsp. japonica (Rice)
Target Names
Os04g0608600
Target Protein Sequence
MGETAEGVEA GEKYVSIPQL AGVGTLLSNG GKEIPLSSIE GKRICLFFSA HWCRPCRNFT PKLLQIYRKL RNTCKNMEII FISLDRDEIS FLDYFKGMPW LALPFDTGLR QKLCVQFDIE HIPALIPLST TLSHGFRVEE DAVKLVEEYG VDAYPFGAKR RSELEGMDDA RRQGGNLLQL LGCKEREYVI SADGIKTPIS DLNGKTIGLY FGAHWCPPCR AFTKQLREAY DELKALRPGN FQVIFISMDR NEEEFQASLS AMPWFAIPYS DTTVQELSRI FTIKGIPTLL ILGPDGKVFK TDGRRIISKY GAMAFPFTES RAYELEEVLK KERDSLPHRV RDHRHEHELE LDMAKAYLST QLFHQTPSVQ PCRLNLKTLR EEYHLIFTNS NRKTSRPQSS YTRQQRDLNN LYSDPKHLPQ LHKHFDQSNV ATAENSLRFL NGEPENSDIS SIHVAFADLA GKIRGEDDKR D
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

Probable function: This protein is a probable thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase potentially involved in various redox reactions.

Database Links
Protein Families
Nucleoredoxin family

Q&A

What is the molecular characterization of nucleoredoxin 3 in Oryza sativa and how does it function in redox regulation?

Nucleoredoxin 3 (OsNrx3) in Oryza sativa subsp. japonica is a member of the thioredoxin protein family that functions as a redox-regulatory protein. It contains the characteristic dithiol active site motif Cys-Pro-Pro-Cys that is crucial for its oxidoreductase activity. While specific information about OsNrx3 is limited, nucleoredoxins generally function by reducing disulfide bonds in target proteins, mediating electron transfer in redox signaling pathways, and protecting antioxidant enzymes from reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced inactivation.

Similar to related nucleoredoxins, OsNrx3 likely participates in maintaining cellular redox homeostasis by regulating different signaling pathways in a redox-dependent manner. Structurally, nucleoredoxins share sequence similarity with tryparedoxin (TryX), more so than with thioredoxin itself, suggesting distinct evolutionary and functional trajectories .

The gene for OsNrx3 (Os04g0608600, LOC_Os04g51920) is located on chromosome 4 of the rice genome. Comparative analysis with other nucleoredoxin family members indicates that OsNrx3 likely plays specific roles in rice defense mechanisms and stress responses that may differ from those of OsNrx1-1 (Os03g0405500), another nucleoredoxin identified in rice .

Expression Systems and Vector Selection

Recombinant OsNrx3 can be expressed using several host systems, including E. coli, yeast, baculovirus, or mammalian cells . For bacterial expression, pET28a (with 6×His-tag) or pGEX-2T (with GST-tag) vectors have proven effective for nucleoredoxin family proteins . The choice of expression system depends on experimental needs:

Expression SystemAdvantagesDisadvantagesRecommended for
E. coliHigh yield, simple, cost-effectiveLimited post-translational modificationsBasic biochemical studies
YeastBetter folding, some post-translational modificationsModerate yieldStructural studies
BaculovirusComplex post-translational modificationsTime-consuming, specialized equipmentActivity assays
MammalianNative-like modificationsLow yield, expensiveInteraction studies

Purification Protocol

For efficient purification of recombinant OsNrx3, the following stepwise approach is recommended:

  • Transform expression vector into appropriate host cells (e.g., E. coli BL21(DE3) pLysS)

  • Culture cells at 37°C until OD600 reaches ~1.0

  • Induce protein expression with IPTG (0.5-1 mM)

  • Harvest cells and lyse in buffer containing protease inhibitors

  • For His-tagged proteins: Purify using Ni²⁺-charged IMAC-sepharose

  • For GST-fusion proteins: Purify using GST Sepharose 4 Fast Flow

  • Remove tags using thrombin cleavage if necessary

  • Further purify using heparin-5PW HPLC column

  • Dialyze against 20 mM HEPES-NaOH buffer (pH 7.5)

Purity can be assessed using SDS-PAGE, typically aiming for ≥85% purity . For preserving redox activity, purification steps should be performed in the presence of reducing agents (e.g., DTT) to prevent oxidation of critical cysteine residues.

How can researchers design experiments to study the protective role of nucleoredoxin 3 against oxidative stress in rice?

An optimal experimental design for investigating OsNrx3's role in oxidative stress protection should incorporate multiple approaches:

Genetic Manipulation Strategies

  • Generate OsNrx3 knockout/knockdown lines using CRISPR/Cas9 or RNAi

  • Create OsNrx3 overexpression lines under constitutive (e.g., 35S) or inducible promoters

  • Develop complementation lines in knockout backgrounds

  • Engineer cysteine-to-serine substitution mutants (particularly in the active site) to create catalytically inactive variants

Oxidative Stress Treatments

Apply graduated stress treatments to wild-type and modified plants:

Stress TypeTreatment MethodDurationMeasurements
H₂O₂1-10 mM foliar spray or hydroponic solution1-24 hoursROS levels, lipid peroxidation
Salt stress50-150 mM NaCl in hydroponic system3-14 daysNa⁺/K⁺ ratio, antioxidant enzyme activities
DroughtWater withdrawal (50-70% field capacity)7-21 daysRWC, proline content, MDA levels
Heat42°C exposure0.5-6 hoursHSP expression, membrane stability

Molecular and Biochemical Assays

Incorporate the following analytical approaches:

  • Monitor redox state changes using redox proteomics techniques

  • Assess antioxidant enzyme activities (catalase, SOD, APX) in wild-type vs. mutant plants

  • Measure H₂O₂ levels using DAB staining and quantitative assays

  • Analyze transcriptome changes under stress conditions

  • Identify protein interaction partners using substrate trapping mutants and affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry

This experimental framework allows for comprehensive characterization of OsNrx3's function in oxidative stress protection, determining both its direct substrates and broader impacts on plant stress physiology.

What methodological approaches are most effective for identifying and validating nucleoredoxin 3 interaction partners in rice?

Identification and validation of OsNrx3 interaction partners requires multiple complementary approaches:

Substrate Trapping Approach

The most effective method for capturing transient thiol-based interactions is the substrate trapping approach using cysteine-to-serine substitution mutants:

  • Generate OsNrx3 mutants with C→S substitutions in the active site (particularly the second cysteine of the CPPC motif)

  • Immobilize the mutant protein on NHS-activated resin

  • Incubate with total protein extracts from rice tissues under conditions of interest

  • Wash rigorously to remove non-specific binding

  • Elute bound proteins with DTT

  • Identify trapped proteins by mass spectrometry

Include appropriate controls: a column with wild-type OsNrx3 and a column without protein to distinguish true substrates from non-specific interactions.

Validation of Interactions

Multiple orthogonal techniques should be employed to validate potential interactions:

TechniqueApplicationAdvantagesLimitations
Co-immunoprecipitationIn vivo verificationDetects native complexesRequires specific antibodies
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC)In vivo visualizationShows subcellular localizationMay force interactions
Surface plasmon resonanceIn vitro kineticsProvides binding constantsUses purified proteins
Yeast two-hybridBinary interactionsHigh-throughputProne to false positives
Pull-down assaysDirect bindingSimpleMay miss weak interactions

Functional Validation

To establish the physiological relevance of interactions:

  • Assess the redox state of potential substrate proteins in wild-type vs. OsNrx3 mutant plants

  • Determine activity changes of partner proteins before and after interaction with OsNrx3

  • Monitor subcellular co-localization of OsNrx3 and partner proteins during stress responses

  • Evaluate phenotypic consequences of disrupting specific interactions

When reporting interaction data, researchers should classify partners based on the number of validation methods and the strength of functional evidence.

How does nucleoredoxin 3 gene expression change under different abiotic stress conditions in rice, and what experimental approaches best capture these dynamics?

While specific data on OsNrx3 expression patterns under stress conditions is limited, studies of related rice nucleoredoxins and other plant species provide a framework for investigation:

Expression Analysis Methods

To comprehensively characterize OsNrx3 expression dynamics:

  • qRT-PCR Analysis: Implement time-course studies using gene-specific primers for OsNrx3, with multiple reference genes (ACT2, UBQ1, UBQ10) for normalization

  • Promoter-Reporter Constructs: Clone the OsNrx3 promoter region (~1kb upstream) fused to GUS or fluorescent reporters to visualize tissue-specific expression patterns

  • RNA-Seq Analysis: Perform transcriptome profiling under various stress conditions to identify co-expressed genes and potential regulatory networks

  • Western Blot Analysis: Develop specific antibodies or use epitope-tagged transgenic lines to monitor protein levels alongside transcript changes

Experimental Design for Stress Treatments

Based on patterns observed with related proteins, implement the following stress treatments:

Stress TypeTreatment ProtocolSampling TimepointsExpected Response
DroughtWithhold water or use PEG0, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hrsPotential upregulation based on redox protective role
Salinity50-150 mM NaCl0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hrsMay increase similar to other redox enzymes
Cold4°C exposure0, 6, 12, 24, 48 hrsVariable response
Heat42°C exposure0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12 hrsLikely rapid induction
OxidativeH₂O₂ (1-10 mM)0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 hrsStrong induction expected
Phosphorus deficiencyLow P media0, 3, 7, 14, 21 daysPotential upregulation based on OsNrx1-1 patterns

This comprehensive approach will allow researchers to determine if OsNrx3 follows the pattern observed for OsNrx1-1, which showed a 2.1-fold increase in roots under phosphorus deficiency (p=0.0176), or if it responds differently to specific stressors.

How do different rice nucleoredoxin isoforms compare functionally, and what experimental approaches can differentiate their roles?

Rice contains multiple nucleoredoxin isoforms, including OsNrx1-1 (Os03g0405500) and OsNrx3 (Os04g0608600). Differentiating their functions requires systematic comparative analysis:

Comparative Sequence and Structure Analysis

Perform bioinformatic analysis to identify unique features:

  • Multiple sequence alignment of all rice nucleoredoxin isoforms

  • Domain architecture comparison

  • Identification of unique motifs and potential regulatory elements

  • Homology modeling of three-dimensional structures

  • Phylogenetic analysis to determine evolutionary relationships with nucleoredoxins from other species

Differential Expression Analysis

Characterize expression patterns through:

  • Tissue-specific expression profiling across developmental stages

  • Stress-responsive expression under diverse conditions

  • Subcellular localization studies using fluorescent protein fusions

  • Co-expression network analysis to identify functional associations

Genetic Approaches for Functional Differentiation

Implement the following genetic strategies:

ApproachMethodologyExpected OutcomesAnalysis Methods
Single knockoutsCRISPR/Cas9 for each isoformIsoform-specific phenotypesPhysiological and biochemical assays
Double/multiple knockoutsCombined targetingSynergistic effectsComparative phenotyping
Reciprocal complementationExpress one isoform in another's knockoutFunctional redundancy assessmentPhenotype rescue analysis
Domain swappingCreate chimeric proteinsDomain-specific functionsActivity and interaction assays
Promoter swappingExpress coding sequences under different native promotersRegulatory vs. protein function differencesExpression pattern analysis

Substrate Specificity Determination

Identify distinct sets of interaction partners:

  • Perform substrate trapping experiments with each isoform individually

  • Compare substrate profiles using quantitative proteomics

  • Analyze binding affinities with shared substrates

  • Investigate tissue-specific interactions

This comprehensive approach enables researchers to establish both unique and overlapping functions between OsNrx3 and other nucleoredoxin isoforms in rice, potentially revealing specialized roles in different tissues or under specific stress conditions.

What are the best approaches for studying the redox-dependent structural modifications of rice nucleoredoxin 3?

Nucleoredoxins can undergo significant structural changes depending on redox conditions, which are critical to their function. For studying these modifications in OsNrx3:

Monitoring Oligomerization States

Nucleoredoxins can exist in monomeric and oligomeric forms depending on redox conditions, as observed in Arabidopsis NRX1 which transforms from low molecular weight monomers to polymeric forms under oxidative stress :

  • Use non-reducing vs. reducing SDS-PAGE to visualize different oligomeric states

  • Employ size exclusion chromatography to separate and quantify different oligomeric forms

  • Apply native gel electrophoresis to preserve physiological protein associations

  • Utilize analytical ultracentrifugation for precise determination of oligomerization states

Detecting Specific Thiol Modifications

Various modifications can occur on critical cysteine residues:

Modification TypeDetection MethodNotes
Disulfide bondsDiagonal electrophoresisSeparates proteins based on disulfide content
S-glutathionylationAnti-GSH antibodiesReversible modification by glutathione
S-nitrosylationBiotin switch techniqueNO-mediated modification
Sulfenic acidDimedone-based probesFirst step of oxidation
Sulfinic/sulfonic acidLC-MS/MS analysisHigher oxidation states

Structural Analysis Methods

For detailed structural characterization:

Mutation-Based Strategy

Create a panel of cysteine substitution mutants similar to the approach used for Arabidopsis NRX1:

  • Generate the following OsNrx3 variants:

    • Wild-type control

    • Active site mutants (CPPC→SPPS)

    • Non-active site cysteine mutants

    • Combined mutants

  • Compare their structural properties under normal and oxidative conditions

  • Assess their ability to undergo polymerization and structural transitions

  • Correlate structural changes with enzymatic activity and substrate binding

This comprehensive approach will provide insights into how redox-dependent structural modifications of OsNrx3 contribute to its function in rice stress responses.

How can researchers design experiments to investigate nucleoredoxin 3's involvement in specific stress signaling pathways in rice?

To determine OsNrx3's role in specific stress signaling pathways, a multi-level experimental approach is needed:

Pathway Integration Analysis

Investigate OsNrx3's positioning within known stress signaling networks:

  • Hormone Response Assays: Determine if OsNrx3 expression is regulated by stress hormones (ABA, JA, SA, ethylene) using exogenous application followed by qRT-PCR analysis

  • Epistasis Analysis: Create double mutants between OsNrx3 and known signaling components to establish genetic interactions

  • Protein-Protein Interaction Network: Identify interactions with known signaling components using yeast two-hybrid or affinity purification-mass spectrometry approaches

  • Phosphorylation Status: Determine if OsNrx3 is regulated by stress-activated kinases through phosphoproteomic analysis

Signaling Pathway Reporter Systems

Develop experimental systems to monitor pathway activity:

PathwayReporter SystemMeasurement ApproachExpected Impact of OsNrx3
ABA signalingABA-responsive promoter::LUCLuminescence imagingPotential regulation similar to NRX in other species
ROS signalingH₂O₂-responsive promoter::GFPFluorescence microscopyDirect impact expected
Ca²⁺ signalingAequorin or GCaMP sensorsLuminescence/fluorescencePossible indirect effects
MAPK cascadePhospho-specific antibodiesWestern blottingPotential redox regulation
Wnt/β-cateninTCF/LEF reporterGene expression analysisPossible interaction based on NRX findings

Time-Resolved Analysis

Implement temporal studies to position OsNrx3 within signaling cascades:

  • Apply stress treatments and collect samples at multiple timepoints (0, 5, 15, 30 min, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 h)

  • Analyze activation timing of different signaling components

  • Compare timing of OsNrx3 activity/modifications with upstream and downstream events

  • Use pharmacological inhibitors of specific pathways to establish dependency relationships

Cell-Type Specific Approaches

Determine if OsNrx3 functions in specific cell types during stress responses:

  • Generate cell-type specific promoter::OsNrx3-GFP fusions

  • Perform laser capture microdissection followed by expression analysis

  • Use FACS sorting of protoplasts from reporter lines

  • Implement single-cell RNA-seq to identify cell populations with coordinated expression

This comprehensive approach will help establish whether OsNrx3 participates in ABA signaling pathways (as observed for nucleoredoxin in Arabidopsis ), regulates Wnt/β-catenin signaling (as seen in animal systems ), or has rice-specific signaling roles.

How can transcriptomic and proteomic approaches be combined to understand nucleoredoxin 3 function in rice under stress conditions?

A multi-omics approach provides comprehensive insights into OsNrx3 function under stress conditions:

Integrated Experimental Design

Design experiments that capture both transcriptional and protein-level changes:

  • Treatment Design: Subject wild-type and OsNrx3 mutant plants to controlled stress conditions (drought, salinity, oxidative stress) with appropriate replication

  • Tissue Sampling: Collect tissues at strategic timepoints for parallel processing

  • Sample Division: Process identical samples for both transcriptomic and proteomic analyses

  • Controls: Include tissue-matched, time-matched, and genotype-matched controls

Transcriptomic Analysis Pipeline

Implement RNA-seq with focus on differential expression:

  • Extract total RNA using appropriate methods to maintain integrity

  • Prepare sequencing libraries with strand specificity

  • Perform deep sequencing (>30M reads per sample)

  • Align to the rice reference genome and quantify expression levels

  • Identify differentially expressed genes between:

    • Stress vs. control conditions

    • Wild-type vs. OsNrx3 mutant plants

    • Interaction effects (genes differently responsive to stress in mutants)

Proteomic Analysis Workflow

Employ quantitative proteomics with redox sensitivity:

  • Extract proteins under conditions that preserve redox state

  • Implement ICAT or iodoTMT labeling to capture redox-sensitive thiols

  • Perform LC-MS/MS analysis for protein identification and quantification

  • Analyze post-translational modifications, particularly redox-related ones

  • Compare protein abundance changes with transcriptional changes

Data Integration Framework

Correlate and integrate multi-omics data:

Integration LevelAnalytical ApproachExpected Insights
Pathway enrichmentGO and KEGG analysis of both datasetsMajor biological processes affected
Correlation analysisTranscript-protein abundance correlationPost-transcriptional regulation
Network constructionCo-expression and protein interaction networksFunctional modules and hubs
Causality inferenceTime-series analysis with directed graphsRegulatory relationships
Redox-proteome correlationOverlay transcriptome changes with redox proteomeDirect vs. indirect effects

Validation Strategies

The multi-omics approach can identify several categories of targets that should be validated differently:

  • Direct substrates: Validate using biochemical approaches (substrate trapping, activity assays)

  • Transcriptionally regulated genes: Confirm with qRT-PCR and promoter analysis

  • Pathway components: Validate through genetic interaction studies

  • Novel connections: Verify using reporter constructs and transient expression systems

This integrated approach would be similar to the strategy used in recent studies of rice proteome responses to abiotic stresses, which revealed that more than 75% of differentially abundant proteins were specific to individual stresses, while fewer than 5% were shared across all abiotic constraints .

What methodological considerations are important when analyzing contradictory data regarding nucleoredoxin 3 function in different rice varieties?

When faced with contradictory data about OsNrx3 function across different rice varieties, researchers should employ systematic approaches to resolve discrepancies:

Genetic Background Considerations

Account for varietal differences that might influence experimental outcomes:

  • Allelic variation analysis: Sequence OsNrx3 and its regulatory regions across varieties to identify polymorphisms

  • Genome-wide association studies (GWAS): Identify genetic loci that interact with OsNrx3 and differ between varieties

  • Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis: Determine if OsNrx3 expression is controlled by different regulatory elements in different varieties

  • Background substitution lines: Introgress the same OsNrx3 allele into multiple genetic backgrounds to isolate background effects

Experimental Standardization

Implement rigorous standardization to minimize non-genetic sources of variation:

VariableStandardization ApproachDocumentation Requirement
Growth conditionsUse controlled environment chambersRecord all environmental parameters
Developmental stageDefine using standardized metricsDocument precise sampling criteria
Stress applicationQuantify stress intensity objectivelyMeasure physiological stress indicators
Tissue samplingStandardize collection protocolsRecord precise tissues and handling methods
Analysis methodsUse identical protocols across varietiesDocument all methodological details

Statistical Approaches for Resolving Contradictions

Apply robust statistical methods to analyze contradictory results:

  • Meta-analysis: Combine data across studies using effect sizes rather than p-values

  • Factorial experimental design: Systematically test interactions between variety, stress type, and stress intensity

  • Bayesian modeling: Incorporate prior knowledge and uncertainty in data interpretation

  • Power analysis: Ensure adequate sample sizes to detect effects reliably

  • Multivariate analysis: Examine patterns across multiple response variables simultaneously

Mechanistic Resolution Strategies

Investigate mechanistic explanations for contradictory findings:

  • Alternative splicing analysis: Determine if different varieties produce different OsNrx3 isoforms

  • Post-translational modification profiling: Identify differences in protein regulation across varieties

  • Interactome comparison: Compare OsNrx3 interaction partners between varieties

  • Subcellular localization studies: Assess potential differences in protein compartmentalization

  • Redox environment characterization: Measure baseline redox status in different varieties

This approach is supported by findings that rice varieties can show distinct responses to identical stresses. For example, comparative analysis of two rice varieties with different seed vigor revealed unique transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles even under the same conditions , suggesting that genetic background significantly influences stress response mechanisms.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.