Recombinant Outer membrane protein W (ompW)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Immune Evasion and Virulence

  • OmpW promotes V. cholerae survival in high-salt environments by importing carnitine, a compatible solute .

  • Acts as a receptor for bacteriophages (e.g., VP5) and facilitates toxin delivery in V. cholerae .

Immunogenicity

  • Recombinant OmpW triggers robust antibody responses in fish and murine models, with cross-protective potential against multiple bacterial species .

Table 1: Key Studies on Recombinant OmpW Applications

Host SystemApplicationKey FindingsReference
Pichia pastorisVaccine candidate for V. choleraeInduced protective immunity; 22 kDa protein confirmed via sequencing
Listeria monocytogenesDNA vaccine vectorExpressed 28 kDa fusion protein (tLLO-OmpW); elicited Th1/Th2 responses
E. coli OMVsAntigen delivery platformOmpW-GFP packaged into OMVs; 19.8× higher yield in ΔnlpI mutants
PLGA nanoparticlesOral vaccine for A. hydrophila70% survival in vaccinated fish; reduced bacterial load in tissues

Salt Stress Adaptation

  • V. cholerae ompW expression increases 8-fold under 5% NaCl stress, enabling carnitine uptake for osmoregulation .

  • Deletion of ompW reduces bacterial growth in hypersaline conditions by 50% .

Efficacy in Animal Models

  • Fish: Recombinant OmpW from A. hydrophila conferred 97% survival in vaccinated rohu (Labeo rohita) .

  • Mice: OmpW-loaded OMVs induced 100% protection against Burkholderia pseudomallei at 50× LD<sub>50</sub> .

Delivery Systems

  • Outer Membrane Vesicles (OMVs): Engineered E. coli OMVs displaying OmpW elicited 200,000× higher antibody titers than soluble protein .

  • Nanoparticles: PLGA-encapsulated OmpW showed sustained in vitro release over 48 hours .

Challenges and Limitations

  • Antigenic Diversity: OmpW surface loops vary across strains, complicating universal vaccine design .

  • Stability: Recombinant OmpW requires cold-chain storage for oral vaccines .

Future Directions

  • Multi-Epitope Vaccines: Combine OmpW with other conserved OMPs (e.g., OmpA, Omp85) for broader protection .

  • CRISPR-Cas9 Engineering: Enhance OmpW expression in hypervesiculating bacterial mutants for scalable OMV production .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the in-stock format by default. For specific format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Contact your local distributor for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. Request dry ice shipment in advance (extra fees apply).
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Working aliquots are stable at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer, temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us for prioritized development.
Synonyms
ompW; Outer membrane protein W; Outer membrane protein 25Va; Omp25Va; Fragment
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-20
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Vibrio alginolyticus
Target Names
ompW
Target Protein Sequence
HKQGDFVLRV GAASVVPNDS
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Protein Families
OmpW/AlkL family
Subcellular Location
Cell outer membrane.

Q&A

What is Outer Membrane Protein W (ompW) and what are its structural characteristics?

OmpW is a conserved outer membrane protein found in various Gram-negative bacteria. In Acinetobacter baumannii, OmpW consists of 183 amino acids and shows over 91% sequence conservation across reported strains . This remarkable conservation makes it an excellent candidate for immunological studies and vaccine development. OmpW functions as a membrane channel protein that likely participates in small molecule transport across the bacterial outer membrane, though its precise physiological role continues to be investigated.

What expression systems are most effective for recombinant ompW production?

While there are multiple potential expression systems, successful production of recombinant ompW has been achieved using E. coli expression systems with fusion partners. For instance, thioredoxin-OmpW fusion protein has proven effective in immunological studies . When designing expression systems, researchers should consider:

  • Promoter selection (constitutive vs. inducible)

  • Fusion tags for improved solubility and purification

  • Codon optimization for the host organism

  • Signal sequences for proper membrane localization or secretion

Drawing from similar outer membrane protein studies, expression under native promoters may yield better results than strong heterologous promoters, which can lead to inclusion body formation .

How should researchers approach experimental design when studying ompW?

Effective experimental design for ompW research should incorporate Design of Experiments (DoE) methodologies to optimize results. Key principles include:

  • Randomization: Assign experimental units randomly to treatment groups to minimize bias

  • Replication: Perform independent repeat runs of each experimental condition to increase precision and estimate experimental error

  • Blocking: Control for known variables by grouping similar experimental units

  • Factorial approaches: Examine multiple variables simultaneously to identify interaction effects

For ompW expression studies, researchers should systematically evaluate variables including growth media composition, induction parameters, extraction methods, and purification conditions.

What evidence supports ompW as a vaccine candidate against bacterial infections?

Research demonstrates that OmpW is a promising vaccine candidate, particularly against A. baumannii infections. Key findings include:

Experimental ApproachOutcomesSignificance
Mice immunization with thioredoxin-OmpWStrong OmpW-specific IgG responsesConfirms immunogenicity
Active immunization against OmpWImproved survival rates in sepsis modelDemonstrates protective efficacy
Passive immunization with anti-OmpW seraReduced bacterial burdens in organsShows antibody-mediated protection
Challenge with diverse clinical isolatesBroad protection against distinct strainsIndicates cross-protective potential

These findings collectively support OmpW's potential as a vaccine antigen, with protection demonstrated through multiple immunological mechanisms .

How do ompW-specific antibodies contribute to immune protection?

OmpW-specific antibodies contribute to protection through opsonophagocytic activity. Studies have demonstrated that antisera from OmpW-immunized mice exhibit bactericidal effects mediated synergistically by specific antibodies and complement components . These antisera demonstrated significant opsonophagocytic activities against both homologous strains and clonally distinct clinical isolates in vitro, facilitating bacterial clearance by phagocytes .

This mechanism was confirmed through opsonophagocytic assays with murine macrophage RAW264.7 cells, which showed enhanced bacterial killing in the presence of anti-OmpW sera .

What factors influence the immunogenicity of recombinant ompW preparations?

Several factors affect the immunogenicity of recombinant OmpW:

  • Protein conformation: Proper folding to maintain critical epitopes

  • Fusion partners: The thioredoxin fusion partner has proven effective in enhancing immunogenicity

  • Adjuvant selection: Different adjuvants can significantly alter the type and magnitude of immune response

  • Dosing schedule: Prime-boost intervals influence antibody development

  • Purification quality: Contaminants may affect immune response specificity

Researchers should systematically evaluate these factors using DoE approaches to optimize immunization protocols.

How can researchers optimize purification protocols for recombinant ompW?

Purification of recombinant OmpW presents challenges due to its membrane-associated nature. Based on approaches used for similar proteins, an optimized protocol might include:

  • Initial extraction using appropriate detergents to solubilize membrane proteins

  • Affinity chromatography leveraging fusion tags (if present)

  • Ion-exchange chromatography for further purification

  • Size exclusion chromatography as a polishing step

For instance, in studies with the related OmpF protein, researchers successfully employed anion-exchange chromatography followed by reverse-phase chromatography to achieve high purity . When designing purification protocols for OmpW, researchers should consider experimental data demonstrating that excessive purification steps might compromise structural integrity of outer membrane proteins.

What controls are essential in ompW vaccination challenge studies?

Robust ompW vaccination studies require comprehensive controls:

  • Negative controls:

    • Unimmunized animals

    • Animals receiving adjuvant only

    • Animals immunized with irrelevant proteins

  • Positive controls:

    • Animals immunized with known protective antigens

    • Animals receiving passive protection with confirmed protective antibodies

  • Procedural controls:

    • Randomization of animals to treatment groups

    • Blinding of investigators during assessment

    • Standardized challenge doses and routes

These controls help distinguish specific protective effects of OmpW immunization from non-specific effects or experimental artifacts.

How should researchers design experiments to evaluate cross-protection against diverse bacterial strains?

Evaluating cross-protection requires careful experimental design:

  • Strain selection: Curate a panel of clinical isolates representing genetic diversity of the target species

  • Sequence analysis: Determine ompW sequence variation across isolates (noting >91% conservation in A. baumannii)

  • In vitro studies: Perform opsonophagocytic assays with sera against diverse strains

  • In vivo challenge: Test protection against representative strains from different clades

  • Correlative analysis: Relate protection levels to epitope conservation

Implementing a factorial design approach allows researchers to assess protection across multiple strain variables simultaneously while minimizing the number of required experiments .

What statistical approaches are recommended for analyzing immune response data in ompW studies?

Appropriate statistical analysis of immune response data should include:

  • Normalization and transformation: Apply log-transformation for antibody titers to achieve normal distribution

  • Multiple comparisons: Use ANOVA with post-hoc tests (Tukey, Bonferroni) for comparing multiple groups

  • Survival analysis: Apply Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests for challenge studies

  • Correlation analysis: Determine relationships between antibody titers and protection levels

  • Power analysis: Calculate appropriate sample sizes to detect meaningful differences

Researchers should be transparent about their statistical methods and avoid common pitfalls such as inappropriate use of parametric tests for non-normally distributed data.

How can researchers reconcile contradictory results between in vitro and in vivo ompW studies?

When facing contradictory results between in vitro binding/killing assays and in vivo protection studies:

  • Evaluate physiological relevance: In vitro conditions may not fully recapitulate the in vivo environment

  • Consider multiple protection mechanisms: Protection may involve multiple immune mechanisms beyond those assessed in vitro

  • Examine kinetics: The timing of immune responses in relation to challenge may differ between systems

  • Assess strain differences: Variation in ompW expression or accessibility in vivo vs. in vitro

  • Design bridging studies: Develop assays that more closely approximate in vivo conditions

The opsonophagocytic assays used in OmpW studies provide a valuable bridge between simple binding assays and complex in vivo protection .

What approaches can identify immunodominant epitopes of ompW?

To identify immunodominant epitopes, researchers should employ multiple complementary approaches:

  • Epitope mapping: Using overlapping peptide libraries to identify antibody binding regions

  • Mutational analysis: Systematically altering predicted epitopes to assess impact on recognition

  • Structural biology: X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM to visualize antibody-antigen complexes

  • Computational prediction: Algorithm-based epitope prediction followed by experimental validation

  • Protective efficacy correlation: Relating epitope-specific responses to functional protection

Understanding immunodominant epitopes is crucial for rational vaccine design, especially given the high sequence conservation of OmpW (>91%) across A. baumannii strains .

How can researchers troubleshoot poor expression yields of recombinant ompW?

Poor expression yields may be addressed through several strategies:

  • Optimize promoter systems: For outer membrane proteins, native promoters may be preferable to strong heterologous promoters that can lead to inclusion body formation

  • Adjust induction parameters: Lower temperatures (16-25°C) and reduced inducer concentrations may improve folding

  • Consider fusion partners: Fusion proteins can enhance solubility and expression

  • Evaluate fed-batch strategies: Different feeding strategies significantly impact protein yields, with pH-stat feeding using complex nutrient solutions showing superior results for similar outer membrane proteins

  • Modify extraction methods: Gentle extraction procedures may improve recovery of properly folded protein

What are the most effective methods to assess functional activity of purified recombinant ompW?

Functional assessment of purified OmpW should include:

  • Structural integrity analysis: Circular dichroism to confirm secondary structure

  • Oligomerization assessment: Size exclusion chromatography to verify native assembly state

  • Antibody recognition: Binding to conformation-specific antibodies

  • Functional assays: If transport function is known, substrate translocation assays

  • In vitro bioactivity: Opsonophagocytic killing assays to confirm immunological function

How should researchers design dose-optimization studies for ompW-based vaccines?

Dose-optimization requires systematic evaluation:

  • Dose-ranging study design: Test logarithmically-spaced doses (e.g., 1μg, 10μg, 100μg)

  • Multiple readouts: Measure both antibody titers and functional activity

  • Challenge studies: Perform protection studies at each dose level

  • Longitudinal assessment: Evaluate durability of response at different doses

  • Adjuvant interaction: Test dose-sparing effects of different adjuvants

Following DoE principles, a factorial design incorporating both dose levels and adjuvant types would provide the most efficient approach to optimization .

What are promising approaches for enhancing the immunogenicity of ompW-based vaccines?

Several strategies show promise for enhancing OmpW immunogenicity:

  • Novel adjuvant formulations: Testing emerging adjuvants that promote balanced humoral and cellular immunity

  • Multivalent constructs: Combining OmpW with other conserved antigens

  • Nanoparticle delivery systems: Enhancing presentation to the immune system

  • Structure-based design: Engineering OmpW variants with exposed immunodominant epitopes

  • Alternative delivery routes: Evaluating mucosal immunization for respiratory pathogens

How might ompW function as a potential therapeutic target beyond vaccination?

Beyond vaccination, OmpW offers potential as a therapeutic target:

  • Antibody therapy: Development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies targeting OmpW

  • Antimicrobial peptide design: Creating peptides that bind OmpW and disrupt membrane integrity

  • Small molecule inhibitors: Designing compounds that block essential OmpW functions

  • Diagnostic applications: Using OmpW as a biomarker for bacterial identification

  • Drug delivery: Exploiting OmpW channels for antibiotic delivery

What synergies might exist between ompW research and other bacterial outer membrane protein studies?

Researchers can leverage synergies with other outer membrane protein research:

  • Comparative structural analysis: Insights from related proteins like OmpF

  • Expression strategies: Applying successful approaches from other outer membrane proteins

  • Purification techniques: Adapting methods that preserve native conformation

  • Vaccine combinations: Testing OmpW with other protective antigens like OmpF

  • Cross-species conservation: Exploring OmpW homologs in other pathogens for broad-spectrum approaches

The success of fusion protein approaches with OmpF suggests similar strategies may be valuable for OmpW .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.