The ovine RSV G gene contains 838 nucleotides with a major open reading frame encoding a protein of 263 amino acid residues. The predicted molecular weight of this polypeptide is approximately 29 kDa. The gene shares 73% nucleotide sequence identity with that of bovine RSV strain A51908, but only 60% amino acid identity at the protein level, indicating significant divergence between these related viruses . The ovine RSV G protein has the same length as bovine RSV strain A51908 but contains an additional six amino acids at the carboxyl terminus compared to bovine RSV strain 391-2 .
The amino acid sequence of ovine RSV G protein shows only 60% identity with the bovine RSV G protein, with even lower identity (53%) between their extracellular domains . Despite this low level of identity, there are similarities in the predicted hydropathy profiles of the G proteins from ovine and bovine RSV . The intergenic sequences for the SH-G and G-F gene junctions of ovine RSV show 64% and 57% identity respectively with the corresponding regions of bovine RSV . These differences suggest that ovine and bovine RSV might be classified as two subgroups of an ungulate RSV rather than as two distinct viruses .
Based on available research, the RSV G protein is proposed to have three main functional domains (though the information from the search results is incomplete on this specific point) . In human RSV, the central region of the G protein (amino acids 149-200) has been identified as immunologically significant, as it can prime mice for polarized type 2 T-cell responses, and peripheral blood T cells from most human donors recognize epitopes within this region .
While the search results don't specifically address ovine RSV G protein expression systems, related research on RSV fusion (F) glycoprotein demonstrates successful use of baculovirus vectors for expression in Sf9 insect cells . For recombinant RSV G protein, researchers would likely need to:
Clone the G gene from ovine RSV isolates using RT-PCR
Insert the gene into an appropriate expression vector
Express the protein in a cellular system such as insect cells or mammalian cells
Purify the recombinant protein using affinity chromatography
The choice between bacterial, yeast, insect, or mammalian expression systems would depend on the research goals, particularly whether proper glycosylation is required for the intended studies.
Based on principles applied to similar viral glycoproteins:
Codon optimization for the chosen expression system
Inclusion of appropriate secretion signals if extracellular expression is desired
Selection of optimal cell culture conditions (temperature, pH, media composition)
Development of a multi-step purification protocol that may include:
Affinity chromatography (using specific antibodies or tags)
Ion exchange chromatography
Size exclusion chromatography
Implementation of quality control measures to ensure protein integrity and activity
For comprehensive glycosylation analysis, researchers should consider:
Mass spectrometry (MS) techniques:
MALDI-TOF MS for molecular weight determination
LC-MS/MS for detailed glycan structural analysis
Enzymatic digestion with specific glycosidases followed by gel mobility shift analysis
Lectin binding assays to identify specific glycan structures
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy for detailed structural characterization
Comparison with native ovine RSV G protein to assess glycosylation fidelity
Epitope mapping techniques would include:
Generation of monoclonal antibodies against different regions of the G protein
Creation of a panel of deletion mutants or overlapping peptides
Competitive binding assays to determine epitope relationships
X-ray crystallography of antibody-antigen complexes when possible
Phage display technology to identify peptide mimics of conformational epitopes
Bioinformatic prediction tools combined with experimental validation
Based on the approaches used for similar recombinant RSV strains:
Reverse genetics systems that allow manipulation of the full viral genome
Creation of specific deletions in the G protein central domain, similar to the rA2cpΔG150-222 or rA2cpΔG177-220 recombinant viruses described for human RSV
Site-directed mutagenesis to modify specific amino acids
Introduction of reporter genes or epitope tags for tracking purposes
Validation of modified viruses through sequencing and functional assays
Research on human RSV with G protein modifications shows that:
Recombinant RSV strains with deletions in the central ectodomain of the G protein (amino acids 151-221 or 178-219) can still replicate effectively in human lung epithelial cell lines
These modified viruses show normal replication at 37°C but develop pinpoint morphology at 39°C
They can replicate in the respiratory tracts of mouse models and elicit serum neutralization and anti-F-protein IgG titers comparable to those of parent viruses
Such modifications might alter the T-cell response profile, potentially reducing unwanted type 2 T-cell polarization that has been associated with respiratory disease enhancement
Researchers can develop:
Subgroup-specific peptide-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) using recombinant G protein or specific peptides
Multiplex assays that can differentiate between ovine and bovine RSV infections
Lateral flow immunoassays for rapid field testing
PCR-based assays targeting the G gene to distinguish viral lineages
Serological assays for epidemiological studies
Such diagnostics would need validation using serum panels from animals with confirmed infections.
Based on RSV vaccine research principles:
Recombinant G protein could serve as a subunit vaccine component, potentially combined with other viral proteins like the F protein
Modified G proteins with deletions in immunomodulatory domains might provide protection without priming for enhanced disease
Nanoparticle formulations containing G protein, similar to the RSV F nanoparticles described in the literature, might enhance immunogenicity
The differential immune responses to various domains of the G protein would need careful evaluation to avoid vaccine-enhanced disease
Both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses should be assessed in appropriate animal models
Researchers investigating this question should examine:
The impact of different glycosylation patterns on antibody recognition
Whether O-linked and N-linked glycans differentially affect immune responses
The role of glycosylation in masking or revealing critical epitopes
How expression systems affect post-translational modifications
Methods to produce recombinant G protein with native-like modifications
This advanced research question requires:
Comparative sequence analysis of G proteins from different RSV strains (human, bovine, ovine)
Identification of regions associated with host cell receptor binding
Cross-species infection studies to determine barriers to transmission
Structural biology approaches to understand receptor-ligand interactions
Creation of chimeric viruses with G proteins from different species to map determinants of host specificity
Researchers should consider:
Selection of appropriate animal models:
| Animal Model | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Sheep | Natural host, relevant immune responses | Expensive, limited reagents |
| Cotton rats | Semi-permissive for RSV, established model | Not natural host for ovine RSV |
| BALB/c mice | Well-characterized, many reagents available | Limited replication of RSV |
| Lambs | Age-relevant natural host | Logistical challenges, cost |
Immunization protocols with appropriate controls
Comprehensive immune response evaluation:
Antibody responses (neutralizing and non-neutralizing)
T-cell responses (Th1/Th2 balance, CD8+ responses)
Mucosal immunity in respiratory tract
Protection against challenge
Assessment of potential enhanced disease upon challenge
To ensure comparability across studies:
Standardize protein characterization methods:
SDS-PAGE to confirm size and purity
Western blotting with reference antibodies
Glycosylation analysis
Activity/functionality assays
Use common reference materials when possible
Implement consistent reporting of:
Expression systems and purification methods
Protein concentration determination techniques
Storage conditions and stability data
Endotoxin levels for proteins used in immunological studies
Conduct side-by-side comparisons with previous preparations when introducing modifications