Recombinant Papio hamadryas Taste receptor type 2 member 7 (TAS2R7)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order remarks for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and serves as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during the production process. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
TAS2R7; Taste receptor type 2 member 7; T2R7
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-317
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Papio hamadryas (Hamadryas baboon)
Target Names
Target Protein Sequence
MTDKVQTTLLFLAIGEFSVGILGNAFIGLVNCMDWVKKRKIASIDLILTSLAISRICLLC VILLDCFMLVLYPDVYATGKQMRIIDFFWTLTNHLSIWFATCLSIYYFFKIANFFHPLFL WMKWRIDRVISWILLGCMVLSVFINLPATENLNADFRRCVKAKRKTNLTWSCRVTKAQHA STKLFLNLVTLLPFSVCLVSFFLLILSLWRHIRRMQLSATGCRDPSTEAHVRALKAVISF LFLFIAYYLSFLIATSSYFIPETELAVIFGEFIALIYPSSHSFILILGNNKLRRASLKVL WTVMSILKGRKFQQKQI
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

Gustducin-coupled receptor involved in the detection of bitter compounds within the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract. It signals via PLCB2 and the calcium-regulated cation channel TRPM5.

Protein Families
G-protein coupled receptor T2R family
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the molecular structure and basic properties of Papio hamadryas TAS2R7?

TAS2R7 is a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) belonging to the T2R family that functions in bitter taste perception. The protein consists of 317 amino acids with the sequence: MTDKVQTTLLFLAIGEFSVGILGNAFIGLVNCMDWVKKRKIASIDLILTSLAISRICLLCVILLDCFMLVLYPDVYATGKQMRIIDFFWTLTNHLSIWFATCLSIYYFFKIANFFHPLFLWMKWRIDRVISWILLGCMVLSVFINLPATENLNADFRRCVKAKRKTNLTWSCRVTKAQHASTKLFLNLVTLLPFSVCLVSFFLLILSLWRHIRRMQLSATGCRDPSTEAHVRALKAVISFLFLFIAYYLSFLIATSSYFIPETELAVIFGEFIALIYPSSHSFILILGNNKLRRASLKVLWTVMSILKGRKFQQKQI . Like other GPCRs, it contains seven transmembrane domains that span the cell membrane. The receptor is classified under UniProt ID Q646F6 and functions within the taste receptor pathway, likely coupling with G-proteins like gustducin to transmit bitter taste signaling. Structural analysis indicates that TAS2R7, like other taste receptors, has evolved to recognize specific bitter compounds, although the exact ligand profile for baboon TAS2R7 remains to be fully characterized through functional studies.

How does TAS2R7 differ evolutionarily from other taste receptors in the T2R family?

Evolutionary analysis of T2R receptors reveals complex patterns of diversification, with different subfamilies evolving at different rates. While we don't have specific information about TAS2R7's exact evolutionary trajectory, research on related T2R receptors provides valuable context. The T2R family exhibits interesting evolutionary patterns where receptor sequence similarity doesn't necessarily correspond to overlapping ligand specificity. For example, the T2R43-47 group evolved more recently through a series of diversification events from common ancestors, accompanied by increased functional divergence . In contrast, receptors like T2R10 evolved earlier and show higher conservation across primates, canids, and even pandas, suggesting important functional constraints .

TAS2R7 likely occupies its own evolutionary niche within this family. The conservation of specific residues across species often indicates functional importance, while variable regions may reflect adaptation to different dietary environments and bitter compound exposure. A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis would be needed to position TAS2R7 precisely within the evolutionary history of taste receptors and determine whether it follows patterns more similar to the highly conserved T2R10 or the more rapidly evolving T2R43-47 cluster.

What expression patterns does TAS2R7 show in Papio hamadryas tissues?

Similar taste receptors have been detected in the gastrointestinal tract, respiratory system, and even in the brain of other mammals. For example, research with human T2Rs has shown expression in enteroendocrine cells and respiratory epithelium, where they may play roles in detecting bitter compounds in the digestive tract and airways. One study even found T2R38 expression in tumor cells from pancreatic cancer patients , suggesting potential non-canonical functions for taste receptors.

To definitively characterize TAS2R7 expression in Papio hamadryas, researchers should consider conducting quantitative PCR, immunohistochemistry, or single-cell RNA sequencing across multiple tissue types. This would provide a comprehensive expression atlas and potentially reveal unexpected functions beyond taste perception.

What experimental approaches are most effective for studying ligand binding properties of recombinant TAS2R7?

Investigating the ligand binding properties of recombinant TAS2R7 requires sophisticated experimental approaches that overcome the inherent challenges of working with GPCRs. The following methodological framework is recommended:

Expression System Selection:
Heterologous expression systems are essential for producing sufficient quantities of functional receptor. While E. coli has been used for expressing some TAS2Rs (as seen with TAS2R4 ), mammalian expression systems like HEK293 or CHO cells often provide better functional expression for GPCRs. These systems support proper protein folding and post-translational modifications critical for receptor function.

Functional Assays for Ligand Binding:

  • Calcium Mobilization Assays: These utilize the G-protein signaling pathway where receptor activation increases intracellular calcium, measurable through fluorescent calcium indicators.

  • BRET/FRET-based Assays: These detect conformational changes upon ligand binding by measuring energy transfer between strategically placed fluorophores.

  • GTPγS Binding Assays: Measure G-protein activation following receptor stimulation.

Screening Strategy:
A hierarchical approach to identify potential ligands is recommended, starting with compounds known to activate related T2Rs. For instance, since strychnine activates human T2R10 and T2R46 , it could be a candidate ligand for testing with TAS2R7. Screening should include:

  • Natural bitter compounds from plants

  • Synthetic bitter compounds with diverse chemical structures

  • Comparative testing against related T2Rs to establish selectivity profiles

This methodological framework provides a comprehensive approach to characterizing the pharmacological properties of TAS2R7, enabling the creation of a detailed ligand profile and structure-activity relationships.

How can researchers optimize expression and purification of functional recombinant TAS2R7?

Optimizing expression and purification of functional recombinant TAS2R7 represents a significant challenge due to the inherent difficulties in working with membrane proteins. The following methodological approach addresses these challenges systematically:

Expression System Optimization:

Expression SystemAdvantagesDisadvantagesRecommendations for TAS2R7
E. coliHigh yield, low cost, rapid growthLimited post-translational modifications, inclusion body formationConsider for truncated or modified constructs; fusion partners (MBP, SUMO) may improve solubility
Insect cellsBetter folding than E. coli, post-translational modificationsMore expensive, longer growth timeGood option for full-length TAS2R7, especially with baculovirus expression system
Mammalian cellsNative-like environment, proper folding and modificationsHigher cost, lower yield, complex protocolsOptimal for functional studies; HEK293 or CHO cells recommended
Cell-free systemsAvoids toxicity issues, rapidExpensive, lower yieldConsider for initial construct screening

Construct Design Considerations:

  • Addition of N-terminal affinity tags (His-tag) for purification, as seen with related taste receptors

  • Fusion partners to enhance stability and expression (e.g., GPCR fusion partners like T4-lysozyme)

  • Codon optimization for the expression system

  • Consider truncations of highly flexible regions while maintaining functional domains

Purification Strategy:

  • Efficient membrane extraction using detergents (DDM, LMNG, or GDN often work well for GPCRs)

  • Two-step purification combining affinity chromatography and size exclusion

  • Maintaining the cold chain throughout purification

  • Buffer optimization to enhance stability (consider adding cholesterol hemisuccinate)

Quality Control Metrics:

  • Size exclusion chromatography to assess monodispersity

  • Functional assays (e.g., ligand binding) to confirm native conformation

  • Circular dichroism to verify secondary structure

Following reconstitution, validation of protein activity is essential. As noted for related proteins, avoiding repeated freeze-thaw cycles is critical for maintaining function . Storage at -20°C/-80°C with the addition of glycerol (generally 5-50%) as a cryoprotectant is recommended, with working aliquots kept at 4°C for up to one week to maintain stability.

What are the critical structural determinants for ligand recognition in TAS2R7?

Understanding the structural determinants of ligand recognition in TAS2R7 is essential for elucidating its function and specificity. While specific structural data for TAS2R7 is limited, comparative analysis with related T2Rs provides valuable insights into potential binding mechanisms.

Research on human T2Rs has revealed that despite sequence divergence, certain key positions in transmembrane domains are critical for ligand binding. For example, studies of human T2R10 and T2R46, which both recognize strychnine despite only 34% sequence identity, have identified specific residues essential for binding this bitter compound . These findings suggest that functional convergence can occur through different structural arrangements.

To identify critical residues in TAS2R7, the following research approach is recommended:

  • Homology Modeling: Creating a structural model based on related GPCRs with known structures, incorporating the specific amino acid sequence of TAS2R7 (MTDKVQTTLLFLAIGEFSVGILGNAFIGLVNCMDWVKKRKIASIDLILTSLAISRICLLCVILLDCFMLVLYPDVYATGKQMRIIDFFWTLTNHLSIWFATCLSIYYFFKIANFFHPLFLWMKWRIDRVISWILLGCMVLSVFINLPATENLNADFRRCVKAKRKTNLTWSCRVTKAQHASTKLFLNLVTLLPFSVCLVSFFLLILSLWRHIRRMQLSATGCRDPSTEAHVRALKAVISFLFLFIAYYLSFLIATSSYFIPETELAVIFGEFIALIYPSSHSFILILGNNKLRRASLKVLWTVMSILKGRKFQQKQI)

  • Comparative Sequence Analysis: Aligning TAS2R7 with functionally characterized T2Rs to identify conserved and divergent regions that may influence ligand specificity

  • Site-Directed Mutagenesis Studies: Systematic mutation of predicted binding pocket residues to assess their contribution to receptor function

  • Molecular Docking Simulations: In silico prediction of ligand binding modes to identify potential interaction sites

  • Chimeric Receptor Approach: Creating hybrid receptors between TAS2R7 and related T2Rs with known ligand profiles to map specificity-determining regions

This multi-faceted approach can provide a comprehensive understanding of the structural basis for TAS2R7's ligand recognition properties, potentially revealing how evolutionary forces have shaped its binding pocket to recognize specific bitter compounds relevant to Papio hamadryas' dietary environment.

What are the recommended protocols for generating cell-based functional assays for TAS2R7?

Developing robust cell-based functional assays for TAS2R7 requires careful consideration of receptor biology and signal transduction pathways. The following methodological approach provides a framework for establishing such assays:

Assay System Selection:

  • Heterologous Expression System:

    • HEK293T cells are often preferred due to their high transfection efficiency and low endogenous GPCR expression

    • Consistent cell passage number (typically between 5-25) ensures reproducibility

    • Stable cell lines expressing TAS2R7 may offer advantages for high-throughput screening

  • Functional Coupling Components:

    • Co-expression of gustducin or chimeric G-proteins that can couple efficiently to TAS2R7

    • For calcium mobilization assays, Gα16gust44 (a chimeric G-protein) often improves coupling efficiency

    • Consider co-expression of necessary downstream elements (e.g., PLC-β2 for calcium signaling)

Assay Protocols:

  • Calcium Mobilization Assay:

    • Seed cells in 96 or 384-well plates at optimal density (typically 20,000-50,000 cells/well)

    • Transfect with TAS2R7 expression construct and coupling components

    • Load cells with calcium-sensitive dye (Fluo-4 AM or similar) 24-48 hours post-transfection

    • Establish baseline fluorescence before compound addition

    • Measure fluorescence changes upon ligand addition using a plate reader with appropriate kinetic settings

    • Include positive controls (compounds activating endogenous receptors) and negative controls

  • Resonance Energy Transfer Assays:

    • Generate fusion constructs with TAS2R7 and luminescent/fluorescent proteins

    • Optimize expression levels to achieve suitable signal-to-noise ratio

    • Establish baseline measurements before ligand addition

    • Monitor conformational changes through BRET or FRET measurements

    • Data analysis should include normalization to baseline and calculation of EC50 values

Validation and Controls:

  • Positive Controls:

    • Use compounds known to activate related T2Rs (if TAS2R7-specific ligands are unknown)

    • Include general GPCR activators as system controls

  • Negative Controls:

    • Mock-transfected cells to control for endogenous responses

    • Inactive compounds structurally related to active ligands

    • Mutated TAS2R7 constructs with impaired function

  • Assay Validation:

    • Determine Z' factor to assess assay robustness

    • Establish dose-response relationships for known activators

    • Assess reproducibility across multiple experiments

This comprehensive approach ensures the development of reliable and sensitive assays for characterizing TAS2R7 function and identifying novel ligands, essential for advancing our understanding of this receptor's biological role.

How can researchers effectively apply mutagenesis approaches to study TAS2R7 structure-function relationships?

Mutagenesis studies represent a powerful approach for dissecting structure-function relationships in TAS2R7. The following methodological framework outlines an efficient strategy for applying mutagenesis to elucidate key functional domains and residues:

Mutagenesis Strategy Design:

  • Predictive Analysis for Target Selection:

    • Conduct sequence alignment with functionally characterized T2Rs to identify conserved residues

    • Utilize homology modeling to predict structurally important regions

    • Identify potential ligand binding pocket residues based on molecular docking simulations

    • Focus on residues in transmembrane domains that likely form the binding pocket

  • Types of Mutations to Consider:

    • Alanine scanning: Systematic replacement of residues with alanine to assess contribution to function

    • Conservative vs. non-conservative substitutions: To evaluate the importance of specific physicochemical properties

    • Domain swapping: Replacing entire regions with corresponding sequences from related receptors

    • Species-specific substitutions: Introducing residues found in orthologs from other species

Mutagenesis Protocol Optimization:

  • Site-Directed Mutagenesis Techniques:

    • QuikChange method for single mutations

    • Gibson Assembly or similar techniques for multiple mutations or domain swaps

    • Employ high-fidelity polymerases to minimize unwanted mutations

  • Mutation Verification:

    • Complete sequencing of the entire coding region

    • Restriction analysis where applicable

    • Transcript expression analysis via RT-PCR

Functional Characterization of Mutants:

  • Expression Analysis:

    • Western blotting to confirm protein expression levels

    • Cell surface expression evaluation via flow cytometry or surface biotinylation

    • Subcellular localization using fluorescently tagged constructs

  • Functional Assays:

    • Calcium mobilization assays to assess signaling capacity

    • Dose-response curves to quantify changes in potency (EC50) and efficacy (Emax)

    • Binding assays with labeled ligands when available

  • Data Analysis Framework:

    • Normalization of functional data to expression levels

    • Statistical comparison with wild-type receptor responses

    • Construction of comprehensive structure-function maps

Systematic Documentation of Results:

Mutation TypeSpecific MutationsEffect on ExpressionEffect on FunctionInterpretation
Transmembrane domain residuese.g., N23A, Y26FMonitored by Western blotAssessed by calcium assayRole in structure or binding
Extracellular loop residuese.g., E86A, K90ASurface expression dataEC50 shifts in response curvesContribution to ligand access
Intracellular residuese.g., R142A, D146ALocalization patternG-protein coupling efficiencyRole in signal transduction
Domain swapse.g., TM3 from TAS2R10Folding assessmentAltered specificity profileSpecificity determinants

This comprehensive approach provides a systematic framework for elucidating TAS2R7's functional architecture, revealing which residues are critical for ligand recognition, receptor activation, and downstream signaling—information essential for understanding the molecular basis of bitter taste perception in Papio hamadryas.

What comparative approaches can reveal insights into TAS2R7 function across primate species?

Comparative studies across primate species can provide valuable insights into TAS2R7 evolution, adaptation, and functional specialization. The following methodological framework outlines approaches for conducting meaningful cross-species comparisons:

Phylogenetic Analysis and Sequence Comparison:

  • Comprehensive Ortholog Identification:

    • Collect TAS2R7 sequences from diverse primate species spanning evolutionary distances

    • Include representatives from New World monkeys, Old World monkeys, and hominids

    • Verify orthology through synteny analysis and phylogenetic reconstruction

  • Evolutionary Rate Analysis:

    • Calculate dN/dS ratios to identify sites under positive or purifying selection

    • Apply codon-based maximum likelihood methods to detect episodic selection

    • Compare evolutionary rates with other T2R family members to contextualize TAS2R7 evolution

  • Structure-Based Sequence Analysis:

    • Map sequence variations onto predicted structural models

    • Identify species-specific variations in putative ligand-binding regions

    • Analyze conservation patterns in transmembrane domains versus loop regions

Functional Comparative Studies:

  • Cross-Species Receptor Expression:

    • Express TAS2R7 orthologs from different primate species in a common cellular background

    • Standardize expression levels through quantitative assessment

    • Ensure comparable membrane localization across orthologs

  • Comparative Pharmacological Profiling:

    • Screen against a standardized panel of bitter compounds

    • Determine EC50 values for active compounds across species

    • Construct comprehensive activation profiles for each ortholog

  • Domain Swapping Between Species:

    • Create chimeric receptors exchanging domains between species with divergent responses

    • Identify regions responsible for species-specific pharmacological profiles

    • Focus particularly on transmembrane domains likely involved in ligand binding

Ecological and Dietary Correlation:

  • Diet Composition Analysis:

    • Compile information on natural diets of primates in the study

    • Identify bitter compounds present in species-specific food sources

    • Correlate dietary bitter compound exposure with receptor sensitivity

  • Habitat and Ecological Niche Correlation:

    • Analyze habitat-specific plant compounds that may drive selection

    • Consider the role of TAS2R7 in detecting environmental toxins relevant to specific ecological niches

Integration with Genomic Data:

  • Copy Number Variation Analysis:

    • Assess whether TAS2R7 shows copy number variations across species

    • Determine if gene duplication events have occurred in specific lineages

  • Regulatory Region Analysis:

    • Compare promoter and enhancer regions across species

    • Identify species-specific regulatory elements that may affect expression patterns

This comprehensive comparative approach can reveal how evolutionary pressures have shaped TAS2R7 function across primates, potentially correlating receptor properties with ecological adaptations and dietary specializations. This information provides crucial context for understanding the functional significance of TAS2R7 in Papio hamadryas and its relevance to broader questions in sensory biology and evolution.

What are the future research directions for TAS2R7 studies?

The study of Papio hamadryas TAS2R7 opens numerous promising research directions that span molecular biology, evolutionary biology, and comparative physiology. Future investigations should focus on several key areas to advance our understanding of this receptor's biology and broader significance.

Structural characterization remains a critical frontier, as no crystal structure or cryo-EM structure exists for any T2R receptor. Developing methods to overcome the inherent challenges of membrane protein crystallization could provide unprecedented insights into TAS2R7's binding pocket architecture. Alternatively, advances in AlphaFold and similar AI-based structure prediction tools may soon enable more accurate structural models without experimental determination.

Comprehensive ligand profiling should aim to identify the natural ligands recognized by TAS2R7 in the baboon's native environment. This would establish connections between receptor function and ecological adaptations, potentially revealing how dietary specialization has shaped taste receptor evolution. High-throughput screening approaches combined with computational prediction methods offer efficient strategies for identifying novel ligands.

Tissue-specific expression mapping using techniques like RNAscope or single-cell RNA sequencing could reveal extraoral expression sites, potentially uncovering non-canonical functions beyond taste perception. Recent discoveries of taste receptors in unexpected locations highlight the importance of comprehensive expression profiling.

Comparative studies across primate species, including humans, should examine whether functional differences in TAS2R7 correlate with dietary specializations and toxin avoidance strategies. Such work would contribute to our understanding of sensory biology evolution and adaptation mechanisms.

Finally, the development of Papio hamadryas as a model organism for taste research deserves consideration, as baboons may provide insights into primate-specific aspects of taste perception that are not accessible in traditional rodent models. The ethical and practical challenges of such research would need careful consideration, but the potential insights into primate sensory biology could be significant.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.