Anchors the catalytic components of the fumarate reductase complex to the cell membrane and binds quinones.
KEGG: pmu:PM0199
STRING: 272843.PM0199
Fumarate reductase subunit C (frdC) is a membrane-anchoring protein component of the fumarate reductase complex in Pasteurella multocida. This complex catalyzes the reduction of fumarate to succinate during anaerobic respiration, allowing the bacterium to use fumarate as a terminal electron acceptor when oxygen is limited. In P. multocida, this enzyme plays a crucial role in energy metabolism under anaerobic conditions, which is particularly relevant during infection when oxygen availability may be restricted.
The complete protein consists of 132 amino acids with a molecular weight of approximately 15 kDa. The amino acid sequence (MTATTSKRKKYVREMKPTWWKKLDFYKLYIAREATAIPTLWFCLVLLYGVISLGSLDSFGNFISFLKNPIVIILNIITLGAMLLNTVTYYVMTPKVLNIIVKNERINPNIITMALWAVTAFISLVILVFMYV) contains predominantly hydrophobic residues, consistent with its role as a membrane anchor .
Fumarate reductase expression in Pasteurella multocida, including the frdC subunit, is influenced by oxygen availability and the presence of alternative electron acceptors. Similar to other respiratory enzymes in bacteria:
Under aerobic conditions: frdC expression is typically repressed as the bacterium preferentially uses aerobic respiration pathways.
Under anaerobic conditions: frdC expression is upregulated, particularly when fumarate is available as an electron acceptor.
Under iron limitation: While specific data for frdC is limited, P. multocida shows significant changes in gene expression patterns under iron-limited conditions, which likely affects anaerobic respiration components .
This regulation pattern is similar to what has been observed with the nitrite reductase system (nrfE) in P. multocida, which is preferentially expressed in vivo during infection and is essential for nitrite reduction under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions .
While direct evidence linking frdC to virulence in P. multocida is limited, anaerobic respiration enzymes often contribute to bacterial pathogenesis by:
Enabling survival in oxygen-limited infection sites
Contributing to energy production during host colonization
Potentially affecting redox balance during infection
Research on related respiratory enzymes, such as the nitrite reductase system, has shown that disruption of the nrfE gene did not affect virulence in mouse models despite being upregulated during infection . This suggests a complex relationship between respiratory enzymes and virulence that may be context-dependent.
Based on successful expression of other P. multocida proteins, the following expression systems have proven effective and could be applied to frdC:
Escherichia coli Expression System:
BL21(DE3) strain is commonly used for expression of P. multocida proteins
pET vector systems (such as pET43.1a) have been successfully employed for P. multocida protein expression
Expression conditions typically involve induction with IPTG at 0.5-1.0 mM when cultures reach OD600 of 0.6-0.8
For membrane proteins like frdC, consider these optimizations:
Lower induction temperatures (16-25°C) to improve proper folding
Use of E. coli strains designed for membrane protein expression (C41/C43)
Addition of detergents during cell lysis and purification
For effective purification of recombinant frdC, consider the following approach:
Affinity Chromatography:
His-tag purification using nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) affinity chromatography has been successful for other P. multocida recombinant proteins
For membrane proteins like frdC, include 0.1-1% detergent (e.g., DDM, LDAO) throughout purification
Additional Purification Steps:
Size exclusion chromatography to separate properly folded protein from aggregates
Ion exchange chromatography for removing contaminating proteins
Typical Buffer Conditions:
Extraction buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.5% detergent
Storage buffer: Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol as used for commercial preparations
To assess proper folding and functionality of recombinant frdC:
Structural Analysis:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to evaluate secondary structure content
Thermal shift assays to assess protein stability
Size exclusion chromatography to detect proper oligomerization state
Functional Assays:
Measure fumarate reduction activity in reconstituted membrane systems
Assess membrane integration using liposome incorporation assays
Fumarate reductase activity can be measured spectrophotometrically by monitoring the oxidation of reduced benzyl viologen in the presence of fumarate
Similar approaches have been used to assess functionality of other respiratory enzymes in P. multocida, such as the nitrite reduction assay described for nrfE .
Based on successful approaches with other P. multocida antigens, recombinant frdC could be utilized in vaccine development through:
Subunit Vaccine Approaches:
Formulation with appropriate adjuvants: Single-phase water-in-oil adjuvants have shown success with other P. multocida recombinant proteins
Combination with other immunogenic proteins: Multi-antigen formulations using different membrane proteins (similar to the VacJ, PlpE, and OmpH combination) have demonstrated enhanced protection compared to single-antigen vaccines
Evaluation Protocol:
Assess antibody responses using ELISA to measure antigen-specific titers
Challenge studies with virulent P. multocida strains to determine protective efficacy
Histopathological examination and bacterial load detection to evaluate tissue protection
A systematic evaluation approach similar to that used for recombinant VacJ, PlpE, and OmpH proteins could be applied, where:
Immunization with single antigens provided 33.3-83.33% protection
Combination of multiple antigens achieved 100% protection against homologous challenge
Fumarate reductase is critically important for bacterial adaptation to microaerobic and anaerobic environments within hosts:
Environmental Adaptation:
During infection, P. multocida encounters varying oxygen concentrations in different host tissues
Expression of fumarate reductase allows utilization of alternative electron acceptors when oxygen is limited
This metabolic flexibility contributes to bacterial persistence in diverse host niches
Expression Patterns:
Similar to nrfE, frdC expression may be upregulated during in vivo growth
Real-time RT-PCR analysis could be used to quantify expression changes under different conditions, as was done for nrfE
Understanding expression patterns can reveal when this metabolic pathway is most important during infection
Structural Variation Analysis:
Sequence alignment of frdC from different P. multocida serotypes shows high conservation in membrane-spanning regions
Variation typically occurs in loop regions that may be exposed to the periplasm
These variations could affect antibody recognition and cross-protective potential
Implications for Vaccine Development:
Highly conserved epitopes represent targets for broad cross-protection
Strain-specific variations may necessitate multivalent vaccine approaches
Epitope mapping using truncated recombinant fragments could identify immunodominant regions
This approach mirrors successful epitope mapping strategies used for PMT, where recombinant fragments (PMT-A, PMT-B, PMT-C, and PMT2.3) were evaluated for antigenicity and protection .
In Vitro Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:
Co-immunoprecipitation with antibodies against frdC or other complex components
Bacterial two-hybrid systems to map interaction domains
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to determine binding kinetics
Structural Studies:
Cryo-electron microscopy of reconstituted complexes
X-ray crystallography of the assembled complex
Cross-linking mass spectrometry to identify interaction interfaces
Genetic Approaches:
Site-directed mutagenesis to identify critical residues for complex assembly
Complementation studies in frdC knockout strains
Suppressor mutation analysis to identify functional interactions
Based on successful gene disruption methods used for the nrfE gene in P. multocida :
Gene Knockout Strategy:
PCR amplification of the target gene and flanking regions
Insertion of a tetracycline resistance cassette (tetM) into the coding sequence
Electroporation of the construct into P. multocida after dam methylation
Selection of recombinants on media containing tetracycline (2.5 μg/ml)
Verification by PCR and sequencing
Complementation Approach:
Cloning of the wild-type frdC gene into a shuttle vector
Introduction of the complementation construct into the knockout strain
Functional assays to confirm restoration of activity
Phenotypic Analysis:
Growth curves under aerobic vs. anaerobic conditions
Fumarate reduction assays with cell lysates or membrane fractions
Immunization Protocol:
Prepare recombinant frdC protein (100 μg per dose) formulated with water-in-oil adjuvant (2:3 ratio)
Vaccinate animal groups (n=6-10) via appropriate route (subcutaneous or intramuscular)
Administer booster vaccinations at 2-3 week intervals
Collect serum samples before vaccination and at regular intervals post-vaccination
Immunological Assays:
ELISA to measure specific antibody titers:
Coat plates with purified native or recombinant frdC
Incubate with serial dilutions of test sera
Detect using species-appropriate secondary antibodies
Calculate endpoint titers or OD50 values
Western blotting to confirm antibody specificity:
Run purified frdC and P. multocida lysates on SDS-PAGE
Transfer to membranes and probe with immune sera
Visualize with appropriate detection systems
Protection Studies:
Challenge vaccinated animals with virulent P. multocida (typically 20 LD50)
Monitor clinical signs, mortality, and bacterial colonization
Perform histopathological examination to assess tissue protection
| Problem | Solution | Implementation Details |
|---|---|---|
| Inclusion body formation | Lower induction temperature | Induce at 16-20°C overnight instead of 37°C |
| Reduce inducer concentration | Use 0.1-0.2 mM IPTG instead of 1 mM | |
| Use solubility-enhancing fusion tags | Add MBP, SUMO or Thioredoxin fusion tags | |
| Membrane insertion issues | Express in C41/C43 E. coli strains | These strains are engineered for membrane protein expression |
| Co-express with chaperones | Include plasmids expressing GroEL/GroES |
| Problem | Solution | Implementation Details |
|---|---|---|
| Low expression level | Codon optimization | Adapt codons to E. coli preference |
| Screened growth media | Test TB, 2XYT, and auto-induction media | |
| Difficult extraction | Optimize detergent selection | Test DDM, LDAO, Fos-choline-12 |
| Two-step extraction | First extract with mild detergent, then stronger detergent | |
| Protein instability | Add stabilizing agents | Include glycerol (10-20%) and specific lipids |
| Problem | Solution | Implementation Details |
|---|---|---|
| Denaturation during purification | Gentle purification conditions | Avoid harsh elution conditions |
| Maintain constant detergent | Keep consistent detergent concentration throughout | |
| Loss of cofactors | Supplement with native lipids | Add E. coli lipid extracts during purification |
| Reconstitution into nanodiscs | Use MSP proteins to create membrane mimetics |
Based on approaches successfully used with other P. multocida antigens:
Adjuvant Selection and Optimization:
Single-phase water-in-oil adjuvants have shown success with recombinant P. multocida proteins
Optimal protein:adjuvant ratios are typically 2:3 with final concentration of 100 μg protein per 500 μl dose
Multi-Antigen Approaches:
Combining frdC with other membrane proteins could enhance protection
The combination of three recombinant proteins (VacJ, PlpE, OmpH) provided 100% protection against P. multocida challenge in ducks, while individual proteins gave 33.3-83.33% protection
Molecular Adjuvant Fusion:
Fusion of complement component C3d to antigen peptides enhances immune responses
Multiple C3d units (up to 6 repeats) can be linked to target epitopes using GS linkers
This approach was successful with P. multocida toxin (PMT) epitopes
Epitope Enhancement:
Identify immunodominant epitopes through epitope mapping
Similar to PMT, where specific regions (PMT2.3) showed higher protection
Functional Domain Prediction:
Transmembrane topology prediction using TMHMM, MEMSAT, or Phobius
Conserved domain analysis through InterPro, CDD, or Pfam
Functional site prediction with ConSurf based on evolutionary conservation
Epitope Mapping:
B-cell epitope prediction tools:
BepiPred for linear epitopes
DiscoTope for conformational epitopes
EPCES for surface accessibility analysis
T-cell epitope prediction:
NetMHCpan for MHC-I binding prediction
NetMHCIIpan for MHC-II binding prediction
SYFPEITHI for proteasomal processing prediction
Structural Analysis:
Homology modeling based on related fumarate reductase structures
Molecular dynamics simulations to identify stable conformations
Docking studies to predict interactions with other complex components
This bioinformatic approach can guide experimental design, similar to how PMT epitopes were predicted and used in the design of recombinant P. multocida toxin constructs .