Recombinant Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum Glycogen debranching enzyme (glgX), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Enzyme Overview

Recombinant Glycogen Debranching Enzyme (GlgX) catalyzes the hydrolysis of α-1,6-glycosidic linkages in branched glycogen molecules, converting them into linear α-1,4-glucan chains. This activity is essential for glycogen breakdown, enabling glucose mobilization during starvation or stress . The "partial" designation likely refers to a truncated recombinant variant lacking specific domains (e.g., regulatory or non-catalytic regions).

Functional Role in Glycogen Metabolism

GlgX operates within a glycogen metabolism network alongside:

Partner EnzymeFunctionInteraction Score
GlgC (ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase)Synthesizes ADP-glucose for glycogen chain elongation0.999
GlgA (Glycogen synthase)Extends α-1,4-glucan chains0.999
GlgB (Branching enzyme)Introduces α-1,6-linked branches0.996
GlgP (Glycogen phosphorylase)Cleaves α-1,4 linkages to release glucose-1-phosphate0.995

These interactions highlight GlgX’s role in balancing glycogen synthesis and degradation .

Biotechnological Implications

Recombinant GlgX could have applications in:

  1. Biofuel Production: Enhancing glycogen breakdown in engineered microbes for increased glucose yield.

  2. Stress Response Studies: Investigating glycogen dynamics in bacterial survival under nutrient-limited conditions.

Research Gaps and Future Directions

  • Partial Enzyme Characterization: The truncated form’s activity, stability, and substrate affinity remain unstudied.

  • Expression Systems: No published protocols exist for recombinant GlgX production in P. carotovorum; heterologous systems (e.g., E. coli or Bacillus subtilis) could be explored, as seen for other enzymes .

Key Data from Homologous Systems

ParameterStreptomyces venezuelae GlgX Hypothesized P. carotovorum GlgX
Molecular Weight~79 kDa~80 kDa (predicted)
Catalytic ActivityHydrolyzes α-1,6 linkages in glycogenLikely similar
Regulatory Mechanismc-di-GMP-dependent activationPotential c-di-GMP interaction
Key DomainsCBM_48 (carbohydrate-binding), α-amylaseConserved domains (PF00128, PF02922)

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the format we have in stock. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery time varies by purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. Contact us in advance for dry ice shipping (extra fees apply).
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute protein in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer ingredients, temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you have a specific tag type requirement, please inform us and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
glgX; PC1_3936Glycogen debranching enzyme; EC 3.2.1.196; Limit dextrin alpha-1,6-maltotetraose-hydrolase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum (strain PC1)
Target Names
glgX
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Removes maltotriose and maltotetraose chains attached by 1,6-alpha-linkage to the limit dextrin main chain, producing a debranched limit dextrin.
Database Links
Protein Families
Glycosyl hydrolase 13 family

Q&A

What is the function of glgX in Pectobacterium carotovorum?

The glycogen debranching enzyme (glgX) in P. carotovorum functions as a glucan hydrolase/transferase involved in glycogen metabolism. Based on comparative analysis with similar enzymes in other bacteria, glgX specifically hydrolyzes α-1,6-glycosidic linkages at branch points in glycogen, facilitating complete glycogen degradation. This enzyme is typically part of the glg operon that controls glycogen synthesis and degradation, similar to what has been observed in Rhodobacter sphaeroides where glgX functions as a glucan hydrolase/transferase . The enzyme plays a critical role in mobilizing stored carbohydrate reserves during nutrient limitation or stress conditions.

How is the glg operon organized in P. carotovorum compared to other bacteria?

Based on comparative analysis with related bacteria, the glg operon in P. carotovorum likely includes several genes involved in glycogen metabolism. Though specific data for P. carotovorum is limited in the search results, the operon structure may parallel that found in Rhodobacter sphaeroides, which contains glgC (ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase), glgA (glycogen synthase), glgP (glycogen phosphorylase), glgX (glycogen debranching enzyme), and potentially glgB (branching enzyme) . In R. sphaeroides, researchers found complete open reading frames for glgC and glgA genes and partial sequences for glgP and glgX, while the glgB gene appeared truncated and likely located elsewhere in the genome. This genomic organization reflects the coordinated regulation of enzymes involved in glycogen synthesis and degradation.

What experimental approaches are recommended for characterizing glgX activity?

Characterizing glgX activity requires specific assays for debranching activity. Recommended methodological approaches include:

  • Iodine-glycogen complex assay: Measuring changes in absorbance as branched glycogen is debranched

  • HPLC analysis of released oligosaccharides from defined substrates

  • Coupled enzyme assays measuring glucose release following debranching

  • Assays comparing activity on different substrates (glycogen, amylopectin, pullulan)

For kinetic characterization, researchers should determine:

  • Optimal pH and temperature conditions

  • Substrate specificity using defined branched oligosaccharides

  • Kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax, kcat) with varying substrate concentrations

  • Effects of potential inhibitors or activators

These systematic approaches provide a comprehensive profile of enzyme activity essential for understanding its biological role and potential applications .

What expression systems are most effective for recombinant P. carotovorum glgX?

For recombinant expression of P. carotovorum glgX, Escherichia coli-based expression systems have proven most effective based on similar bacterial protein studies. Vector selection should be guided by protein characteristics and experimental goals:

  • For cytoplasmic expression: pET-series vectors offer high-level expression under T7 promoter control

  • For periplasmic targeting: Vectors incorporating signal peptides like PelB from P. carotovorum itself can facilitate proper folding

When designing expression strategies, researchers should consider:

  • Codon optimization based on E. coli preferences

  • Fusion tags for detection and purification (His6, MBP, GST)

  • Induction conditions (temperature, IPTG concentration, induction time)

  • Host strain selection (BL21(DE3), Rosetta for rare codon supplementation)

The search results indicate successful high-level expression of another glycogen metabolism enzyme (glgC) from a bacterial source using the vector pSE420, resulting in over 35 mg of protein from 10 g of cells, demonstrating the effectiveness of E. coli expression systems for similar enzymes .

How can the PelB signal peptide be optimized for periplasmic expression of glgX?

The PelB signal peptide from P. carotovorum has been successfully employed for periplasmic targeting in E. coli expression systems. To optimize this signal peptide specifically for glgX expression, a systematic mutagenic screening approach is recommended, similar to the methodology described for scFv antibody fragment expression .

The optimization process should include:

  • Generation of signal peptide libraries with varying mutations in:

    • N-terminal region (charge characteristics)

    • Hydrophobic core region (length and hydrophobicity)

    • Cleavage site region (recognition by signal peptidase)

  • Implementation of a reporter system, such as the β-lactamase fusion approach, where β-lactamase activity correlates with successful periplasmic translocation

  • Screening of high-activity clones followed by verification of periplasmic localization

  • Validation in fed-batch fermentations to confirm improved translocation

Research has shown that optimized signal peptides can increase periplasmic protein activity by approximately 40% compared to wild-type signal sequences, making this approach valuable for enhancing recombinant glgX production .

What purification strategy yields the highest purity and activity for recombinant glgX?

A multi-step purification strategy optimized for maintaining glgX activity while achieving high purity is recommended. Based on successful approaches with similar enzymes, the following methodology is suggested:

  • Initial extraction:

    • For periplasmic expression: Osmotic shock extraction to selectively release periplasmic proteins

    • For cytoplasmic expression: Sonication or high-pressure homogenization followed by centrifugation

  • Capture step:

    • Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged proteins

    • Alternative affinity approaches for other fusion tags

  • Intermediate purification:

    • Ion exchange chromatography (typically anion exchange at pH>pI)

    • Hydrophobic interaction chromatography if appropriate

  • Polishing step:

    • Size exclusion chromatography for final purity and buffer exchange

Throughout purification, it's essential to monitor enzyme activity using specific debranching assays and include stabilizing agents in buffers (glycerol, reducing agents, potential metal cofactors). This approach parallels the successful purification strategy described for recombinant ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, which achieved near homogeneity while maintaining full enzymatic activity .

What are the key catalytic residues in P. carotovorum glgX and how can they be identified?

Identifying key catalytic residues in P. carotovorum glgX requires a combination of computational analysis and experimental validation. While specific information about P. carotovorum glgX catalytic residues isn't provided in the search results, the following methodological approach is recommended:

  • Computational analysis:

    • Sequence alignment with well-characterized glycogen debranching enzymes

    • Identification of conserved residues in the active site region

    • Homology modeling using solved crystal structures as templates

    • Molecular docking of substrates to predict substrate-binding residues

  • Experimental validation:

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of predicted catalytic residues (typically aspartic acid, glutamic acid, and histidine residues that participate in glycosidic bond hydrolysis)

    • Activity assays of mutant enzymes to quantify the impact on catalytic efficiency

    • pH-rate profiles to identify residues involved in acid-base catalysis

    • Chemical modification studies using group-specific reagents

  • Structural confirmation:

    • X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM studies of the enzyme with substrate analogs or inhibitors

This systematic approach will provide a comprehensive understanding of the catalytic mechanism of P. carotovorum glgX, essential for enzyme engineering or inhibitor design.

How do substrate specificity profiles compare between glgX from P. carotovorum and other debranching enzymes?

Characterizing the substrate specificity of P. carotovorum glgX requires comparative analysis with debranching enzymes from other organisms. A methodological approach for this comparison includes:

  • Substrate panel testing:

    • Natural substrates: glycogen from different sources (bacteria, animals), amylopectin, pullulan

    • Synthetic substrates: defined branched oligosaccharides with varying branch lengths and positions

    • Chromogenic/fluorogenic substrates for high-throughput screening

  • Kinetic parameter determination:

    • Km, kcat, and catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) for each substrate

    • Inhibition constants for competitive inhibitors

  • Branch point preference analysis:

    • Testing preference for inner vs. outer branches

    • Determination of minimum chain length requirements

    • Analysis of products released (limit dextrins)

  • Structure-function correlation:

    • Identification of substrate binding subsites through mutagenesis

    • Comparison of binding pocket architecture with other debranching enzymes

This comparative approach would reveal unique features of P. carotovorum glgX that might relate to its ecological niche as a plant pathogen and suggest potential biotechnological applications based on its specificity profile.

How can site-directed mutagenesis be used to probe glgX function?

Site-directed mutagenesis provides a powerful approach to investigate structure-function relationships in glgX. A comprehensive experimental design should include:

  • Target selection based on:

    • Sequence conservation analysis identifying invariant residues

    • Structural motifs common to glycoside hydrolase family

    • Predicted substrate-binding residues

    • Potential regulatory sites

  • Mutation design strategy:

    • Conservative substitutions to probe specific chemical properties

    • Alanine-scanning to eliminate side chain contributions

    • Introduction of charged residues to test electrostatic hypotheses

    • Cysteine substitutions for accessibility studies

  • Functional characterization of mutants:

    • Expression and purification verification

    • Activity assays under standard conditions

    • Altered substrate specificity testing

    • Stability analysis (thermal, pH, chemical denaturation)

  • Data analysis and interpretation:

    • Quantitative comparison of kinetic parameters

    • Structure-based interpretation of results

    • Integration with computational models

This systematic mutagenesis approach would generate a detailed map of residues critical for catalysis, substrate binding, and structural integrity of P. carotovorum glgX, providing insights into its molecular mechanism and evolutionary relationships.

What is the relationship between glycogen metabolism and quorum sensing in P. carotovorum?

The relationship between glycogen metabolism and quorum sensing in P. carotovorum represents an important area for investigation, given the role of quorum sensing in regulating virulence. Based on available information, the following experimental approach is recommended:

  • Expression analysis:

    • Quantitative PCR to measure glgX and other glycogen metabolism gene expression in response to exogenous N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs)

    • Comparison of glycogen metabolism gene expression in wild-type vs. quorum sensing mutants

    • Promoter-reporter fusion studies to identify regulatory elements

  • Metabolic analysis:

    • Measurement of glycogen accumulation in wild-type vs. quorum sensing mutants

    • Quantification of glycogen levels at different cell densities

    • Determination of glgX enzyme activity across growth phases

  • Regulatory network mapping:

    • Chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify binding of quorum sensing regulators to glycogen metabolism gene promoters

    • Electrophoretic mobility shift assays to confirm direct interactions

    • Analysis of potential regulatory RNA involvement

The search results indicate that P. carotovorum utilizes N-acyl homoserine lactones as quorum sensing signals to regulate the synthesis of virulence factors, particularly plant cell wall degrading enzymes, in a cell density-dependent manner . Two distinct groups of P. carotovorum strains have been identified based on their AHL profiles, suggesting potential diversity in regulatory networks that might extend to glycogen metabolism regulation .

How does glgX contribute to stress resistance in P. carotovorum?

The role of glgX in stress resistance can be investigated through a systematic experimental approach:

  • Construction of genetic tools:

    • Creation of glgX deletion mutants

    • Complementation strains for phenotype validation

    • Overexpression strains to test enhanced glycogen mobilization

  • Stress response characterization:

    • Survival assays under multiple stress conditions:

      • Nutrient limitation

      • Osmotic stress

      • Oxidative stress

      • pH extremes

      • Temperature fluctuations

    • Growth rate determination under suboptimal conditions

    • Long-term survival in environmental samples

  • Glycogen dynamics analysis:

    • Quantification of glycogen accumulation and degradation during stress

    • Measurement of glgX activity in response to stress signals

    • Determination of branch point distribution in glycogen under stress

  • Metabolic flux analysis:

    • Tracing carbon flow from glycogen during stress conditions

    • Measurement of energy charge (ATP/ADP ratio) in wild-type vs. mutants

    • Analysis of metabolite profiles during stress response

This approach would elucidate how glycogen debranching contributes to stress adaptation in P. carotovorum, potentially revealing vulnerabilities that could be targeted to reduce environmental persistence or pathogenicity.

What role does glgX play in P. carotovorum virulence on plant hosts?

Investigating the role of glgX in P. carotovorum virulence requires plant-based experimental systems and molecular genetic approaches:

  • Pathogenicity assays:

    • Comparison of wild-type and glgX mutant virulence on multiple plant hosts

    • Quantification of tissue maceration, bacterial proliferation, and symptom development

    • Assessment of competitive fitness during mixed infections

  • Virulence factor analysis:

    • Quantification of plant cell wall degrading enzyme production in wild-type vs. glgX mutants

    • Activity assays for pectinases, cellulases, and proteases

    • Secretion system functionality assessment

  • In planta gene expression:

    • Transcriptome analysis of bacteria during infection

    • Reporter gene fusions to monitor glgX expression during pathogenesis

    • RNA-seq of plant tissue to assess host responses

  • Metabolic profiling:

    • Analysis of central carbon metabolism during infection

    • Measurement of glycogen dynamics throughout infection cycle

    • Isotope labeling to track carbon source utilization in planta

The search results indicate that P. carotovorum causes soft rot in plants through the production of plant cell wall degrading enzymes regulated by quorum sensing . Wild-type strains can develop symptoms on leaves of in vitro grown potato plants, while certain mutants cannot, suggesting a complex regulatory network controlling virulence that might involve glycogen metabolism .

How can recombinant glgX be utilized in studying plant-pathogen interactions?

Recombinant P. carotovorum glgX can serve as a valuable tool in studying plant-pathogen interactions through several methodological approaches:

  • Enzyme localization studies:

    • Generation of antibodies against purified recombinant glgX

    • Immunolocalization during different stages of infection

    • Creation of fluorescently tagged versions for live imaging

  • Host response analysis:

    • Treatment of plant tissues with purified enzyme to assess defense responses

    • Transcriptome analysis of plants exposed to glgX

    • Metabolite profiling to identify changes in plant carbohydrate metabolism

  • Structure-based investigations:

    • Crystallization of recombinant glgX with plant-derived inhibitors

    • Protein-protein interaction studies with plant defense proteins

    • Molecular dynamics simulations of enzyme-substrate interactions

  • Comparative glycobiology:

    • Analysis of differences between bacterial glgX and plant isoamylase

    • Investigation of potential moonlighting functions during infection

    • Study of evolutionary adaptations to plant host environment

These approaches would provide insights into the metabolic adaptations of P. carotovorum during plant colonization and potentially reveal novel aspects of plant-pathogen interaction that could inform disease management strategies.

What potential applications exist for engineered variants of P. carotovorum glgX?

Engineered variants of P. carotovorum glgX could have several biotechnological applications. A methodological approach to developing such variants includes:

  • Rational design strategy:

    • Structure-guided mutations to alter substrate specificity

    • Stability engineering for industrial conditions

    • Creation of fusion proteins for novel functions

  • Directed evolution approach:

    • Random mutagenesis libraries

    • Selection systems for desired properties

    • High-throughput screening methods

  • Application-specific optimization:

    • For food industry: Engineering for activity in food processing conditions

    • For biofuel production: Enhancing synergy with other hydrolytic enzymes

    • For analytical applications: Improving specificity for branch point analysis

  • Production optimization:

    • Signal peptide optimization for secretion using approaches similar to those described for the PelB signal peptide

    • Fermentation process development

    • Downstream processing for specific applications

The successful expression and purification strategies demonstrated for other recombinant enzymes, such as the ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase which yielded over 35 mg of protein from 10 g of cells , provide a foundation for industrial-scale production of engineered glgX variants.

Table 1: Potential Applications of Engineered glgX Variants
Application Area
Food processing
Biofuel production
Pharmaceutical
Analytical biochemistry
Agricultural biotechnology

How can metabolic flux analysis be applied to understand the role of glgX in bacterial carbon metabolism?

Metabolic flux analysis provides powerful insights into how glgX functions within the broader context of bacterial carbon metabolism. A comprehensive methodological approach includes:

  • Experimental design:

    • Selection of appropriate isotopic tracers (13C-glucose, 13C-acetate)

    • Cultivation conditions simulating relevant environmental scenarios

    • Comparison of wild-type and glgX mutant strains

  • Analytical methods:

    • GC-MS or LC-MS/MS for metabolite labeling pattern analysis

    • NMR for positional isotopomer distribution

    • Enzymatic assays for key metabolite concentrations

  • Computational modeling:

    • Construction of genome-scale metabolic model

    • 13C-metabolic flux analysis using isotopomer data

    • Integration with transcriptomic and proteomic datasets

  • Validation experiments:

    • Targeted gene knockouts of predicted key nodes

    • Enzyme activity measurements at branch points

    • In vivo metabolite concentration measurements

This systems biology approach would reveal how carbon flows through glycogen metabolism pathways and how glgX activity influences flux distributions throughout central carbon metabolism, providing a comprehensive understanding of its role in bacterial physiology and potentially identifying metabolic vulnerabilities that could be targeted for pathogen control.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.