Recombinant Pelobacter carbinolicus Lipoprotein signal peptidase (lspA)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to Recombinant Pelobacter carbinolicus Lipoprotein Signal Peptidase (lspA)

Recombinant Pelobacter carbinolicus Lipoprotein signal peptidase (lspA) is a recombinant protein derived from the bacterium Pelobacter carbinolicus. This enzyme plays a crucial role in the processing of lipoproteins by cleaving the signal peptide, which is essential for the maturation and localization of lipoproteins in bacterial membranes. The lspA enzyme is classified as an aspartyl protease and is involved in the lipoprotein-processing pathway, making it a potential target for antibiotic development due to its essential role in bacterial physiology .

Characteristics of Recombinant Pelobacter carbinolicus Lipoprotein Signal Peptidase (lspA)

  • Species Origin: The protein is derived from Pelobacter carbinolicus, a bacterium known for its involvement in lipid synthesis and found in various environments such as marine muds and freshwater sediments .

  • Protein Structure: The amino acid sequence of lspA from Pelobacter carbinolicus is characterized by specific motifs that facilitate its enzymatic activity. The protein's structure includes a transmembrane helix and a periplasmic domain essential for signal peptide cleavage .

  • Storage and Handling: The recombinant protein is typically stored in a Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol at -20°C to maintain stability. Repeated freezing and thawing should be avoided .

Function and Significance

Lipoprotein signal peptidase (lspA) is crucial for the maturation of lipoproteins by removing the signal peptide, allowing lipoproteins to integrate into the bacterial membrane correctly. This process is vital for bacterial cell envelope integrity and function, making lspA an attractive target for developing new antibiotics .

Function in Bacterial Physiology

FunctionDescription
Lipoprotein ProcessingCleaves the signal peptide from lipoproteins, enabling their integration into the bacterial membrane.
Membrane IntegrityEssential for maintaining the structural and functional integrity of the bacterial cell envelope.
Antibiotic TargetPotential target for developing new antibiotics due to its role in bacterial physiology.

Research Findings and Applications

Recent studies have explored the conformational dynamics of lspA using molecular dynamics simulations and electron paramagnetic resonance. These studies reveal that lspA exhibits flexible conformations, which facilitate substrate binding and enzymatic activity. This flexibility is crucial for lspA's ability to process a variety of lipoprotein substrates .

Conformational Dynamics

  • Apo State: The enzyme's periplasmic helix fluctuates between open and closed conformations, with the closed state occluding the active site from the lipid bilayer.

  • Antibiotic Binding: Binding of antibiotics like globomycin stabilizes intermediate conformations, inhibiting signal peptide cleavage and substrate binding .

Potential Applications in Biotechnology and Medicine

Given its essential role in bacterial physiology, lspA is a promising target for developing novel antibiotics. The enzyme's conformational dynamics and interaction with antibiotics provide insights into designing inhibitors that could effectively disrupt bacterial cell envelope integrity without promoting resistance .

Therapeutic Potential

ApplicationDescription
Antibiotic DevelopmentTargeting lspA could lead to new antibiotics effective against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.
Resistance PreventionThe enzyme's conserved active site suggests that resistance mutations would likely interfere with substrate binding, making it a favorable target for drug development.

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notification and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, provided as a reference for your use.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors: storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the protein's inherent stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during the production process. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
lspA; Pcar_2454; Lipoprotein signal peptidase; Prolipoprotein signal peptidase; Signal peptidase II; SPase II
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-161
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Pelobacter carbinolicus (strain DSM 2380 / NBRC 103641 / GraBd1)
Target Names
lspA
Target Protein Sequence
MKLAQFRILLLIATLVVAVDQLTKGLIVRCLKLHEALPVVPNFFDLVYVRNKGAAFGILA NTEYRVPFFIITTSVAVVFLAWFYRQYRPDQVLGRCAVSLVLGGAIGNLIDRVRFGEVVD FLDVHWYQYHWPAFNVADSAICVGVGMLLLAQWRDGIRHQA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein specifically catalyzes the removal of signal peptides from prolipoproteins.
Database Links
Protein Families
Peptidase A8 family
Subcellular Location
Cell inner membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

Why is P. carbinolicus a unique organism for studying LspA compared to Geobacter species?

P. carbinolicus represents an interesting model for studying LspA because of its distinct metabolic properties compared to its close relatives in the Geobacteraceae family. Unlike Geobacter species, P. carbinolicus cannot oxidize acetate and utilizes different electron transfer mechanisms . Most notably, P. carbinolicus reduces Fe(III) through an indirect mechanism, likely involving sulfur reduction to sulfide followed by Fe(III) reduction with regeneration of elemental sulfur, rather than the direct reduction mechanism employed by Geobacter species . This metabolic distinction suggests that membrane proteins like LspA might function in a unique cellular environment in P. carbinolicus, potentially affecting their properties and interactions with other cellular components.

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant P. carbinolicus LspA?

Based on experience with membrane proteins similar to LspA, E. coli-based expression systems using vectors with inducible promoters (such as pET or pBAD series) are recommended for initial expression attempts. For optimal expression, consider the following parameters:

Expression ParameterRecommended ConditionsRationale
Host strainC41(DE3) or C43(DE3)Better tolerance for membrane protein overexpression
Induction temperature18-20°CReduces inclusion body formation
Induction OD6000.6-0.8Optimal cell density for protein production
IPTG concentration0.1-0.5 mMLower concentrations reduce toxicity
Expression time16-20 hoursAllows slow accumulation of properly folded protein

For membrane proteins like LspA, inclusion of proper solubilization agents and detergents during purification is critical to maintain structure and function. Given that LspA is a membrane-embedded aspartyl protease, purification in the presence of inhibitors may be necessary to prevent autoproteolysis during the purification process.

How does the conformational flexibility of LspA influence its substrate specificity and inhibition profile?

The conformational dynamics of LspA are central to understanding both its mechanism of action and approaches to its inhibition. Research shows that LspA undergoes significant conformational changes with the periplasmic helix (PH) fluctuating on the nanosecond timescale . These dynamics create at least three distinct conformational states:

  • Closed conformation (predominant in apo state): The PH occludes the charged active site from the lipid bilayer, with only about 6.2 Å between the β-cradle and PH .

  • Intermediate conformation: Observed in globomycin-bound states, this conformation may also represent the substrate-bound "clamped" state .

  • Open conformation: Creates a trigonal cavity large enough for lipoprotein substrate binding in the correct orientation for signal peptide cleavage .

This equilibrium between conformational states is likely crucial for substrate recognition and specificity. The flexible and adaptable active site explains how LspA accommodates a variety of substrates despite having a highly conserved active site. For researchers working with P. carbinolicus LspA, understanding these dynamics would be essential for designing specific inhibitors or engineering the enzyme for altered substrate specificity.

What methodological approaches are most effective for characterizing the conformational dynamics of recombinant P. carbinolicus LspA?

Based on successful approaches with LspA from other organisms, a hybrid experimental design combining computational and spectroscopic methods is recommended:

MethodApplicationSpecific Information Obtained
Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulationsComputational prediction of conformational statesNanosecond timescale dynamics; energetic barriers between conformations
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR)Experimental validation of predicted conformationsDistance measurements between labeled residues; populations of different conformational states
Continuous Wave (CW) EPRMeasurement of local dynamicsNanosecond timescale motion; side chain mobility
Double Electron-Electron Resonance (DEER)Long-range distance measurementsDistribution of distances between labeled sites in different conformational states
X-ray crystallographyHigh-resolution structural snapshotsAtomic details of specific conformational states

This hybrid approach has proven particularly valuable for membrane proteins like LspA, where each method in isolation has limitations . The combination of computational and experimental approaches provides a more complete picture of the conformational landscape and can reveal conformations not captured in crystal structures alone.

How might the unique metabolism of P. carbinolicus affect LspA function compared to other bacterial species?

P. carbinolicus exhibits several metabolic peculiarities that could potentially influence LspA function. The bacterium has multiple pathways for catabolism of substrates including 2,3-butanediol, acetoin, glycerol, ethanolamine, and ethanol . It lacks certain components found in related Geobacter species and employs different mechanisms for electron transfer .

Several factors may influence LspA function in P. carbinolicus:

  • Membrane composition: P. carbinolicus may have a unique membrane lipid composition due to its distinct metabolism, potentially affecting LspA integration and dynamics.

  • Redox environment: The requirement for elemental sulfur or sulfide during growth on Fe(III) suggests a distinct periplasmic redox environment that could influence LspA stability and activity.

  • Substrate profile: The genome encodes for autotransporters and various appendages , suggesting unique surface proteins that may include lipoproteins processed by LspA with potentially distinct signal sequences.

  • Protein-protein interactions: The absence of outer-surface c-type cytochromes indicates different membrane protein organization that could affect LspA interactions with substrate proteins or other components of the lipoprotein-processing pathway.

What are effective strategies for optimizing the purification of active recombinant P. carbinolicus LspA?

Purification of membrane proteins like LspA requires careful optimization. The following stepwise approach is recommended:

  • Membrane fraction isolation:

    • Harvest cells and disrupt by sonication or French press

    • Separate membrane fraction by ultracentrifugation (100,000 × g, 1 hour)

    • Wash membranes with high-salt buffer to remove peripheral proteins

  • Solubilization screening:

    • Test multiple detergents at various concentrations

    • Recommended starting panel: DDM (0.5-2%), LMNG (0.01-0.1%), and GDN (0.01-0.1%)

  • Purification strategy:

Purification StepMethodBuffer Conditions
Initial captureIMAC (for His-tagged constructs)50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 0.05% selected detergent
Intermediate purificationIon exchange20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 0-500 mM NaCl gradient, 0.03% detergent
Final polishingSize exclusion20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.02% detergent
  • Activity preservation:

    • Include 10% glycerol in all buffers to enhance stability

    • Consider adding specific lipids (POPE/POPG at 0.01-0.05 mg/ml) to maintain native-like environment

    • For long-term storage, flash freeze small aliquots in liquid nitrogen

The purified protein should be validated for proper folding using circular dichroism spectroscopy and for activity using synthetic peptide substrates or native substrate mimics.

How can researchers effectively assay the enzymatic activity of recombinant P. carbinolicus LspA?

Assaying LspA activity presents challenges due to its membrane-embedded nature and the complexity of its native substrates. Several complementary approaches are recommended:

  • Fluorogenic peptide substrate assay:

    • Design synthetic peptides mimicking the signal sequence of P. carbinolicus lipoproteins

    • Incorporate FRET pairs or environmentally sensitive fluorophores

    • Monitor cleavage through changes in fluorescence

  • Mass spectrometry-based assay:

    • Incubate LspA with synthetic peptide substrates

    • Analyze reaction products by LC-MS/MS

    • Quantify cleavage products over time to determine kinetic parameters

  • In vivo complementation:

    • Use LspA-deficient bacterial strains

    • Express P. carbinolicus LspA and assess restoration of growth or phenotype

    • Evaluate processing of reporter lipoproteins

Assay TypeAdvantagesLimitationsKey Parameters to Monitor
Fluorogenic peptideReal-time kinetics; high-throughputSimplified substrateKm, kcat, pH dependence, detergent effects
Mass spectrometryDirect product identification; can use complex substratesLower throughput; equipment intensiveCleavage site specificity; intermediate formation
In vivo complementationPhysiological relevance; tests full functionalityIndirect measurement; host background effectsGrowth rate; lipoprotein maturation efficiency

When designing these assays, it's important to consider the conformational dynamics of LspA. The enzyme fluctuates between open and closed states , which may affect substrate binding and catalysis rates under different conditions.

What approaches can resolve contradictory data between computational predictions and experimental results for LspA conformational states?

Contradictions between computational and experimental data on LspA conformational states are common due to the dynamic nature of this enzyme. The following systematic approach can help resolve such discrepancies:

  • Reassess simulation parameters:

    • Ensure proper membrane mimetic environment in MD simulations

    • Extend simulation timescales to capture rare conformational events

    • Consider enhanced sampling techniques (metadynamics, replica exchange)

  • Refine experimental conditions:

    • Test multiple membrane mimetics (nanodiscs, liposomes, detergent micelles)

    • Vary temperature, pH, and ionic strength to probe condition-dependent dynamics

    • Use time-resolved measurements to capture transient states

  • Bridging approaches:

ApproachImplementationExpected Outcome
Markov State ModelingBuild MSM from MD trajectoriesPopulation distributions comparable to experimental data
Ensemble refinementRefine structural models against experimental restraintsModels that satisfy both computational energetics and experimental observables
Multi-probe validationUse orthogonal experimental techniquesConvergent evidence for conformational states
Site-directed mutagenesisIntroduce mutations predicted to stabilize specific conformationsExperimental validation of computational hypotheses

A successful example of resolving contradictory data is demonstrated in studies of LspA from other organisms, where MD simulations revealed conformational states not observed in crystal structures but later confirmed by EPR measurements . This highlights the importance of using hybrid approaches when studying dynamic membrane proteins.

How should researchers interpret changes in gene expression patterns for P. carbinolicus LspA under different growth conditions?

When analyzing gene expression data for P. carbinolicus LspA, consider the following interpretive framework:

  • Metabolic context: P. carbinolicus has diverse metabolic capabilities and can grow by fermentation, syntrophic hydrogen/formate transfer, or electron transfer to sulfur . Expression changes should be interpreted in the context of these metabolic modes.

  • Comparative analysis framework:

Growth ConditionExpected LspA Expression PatternBiological Interpretation
Fermentative growthBaseline expressionStandard lipoprotein processing requirements
Fe(III) reductionPotential differential regulationMay reflect adaptation to indirect Fe(III) reduction mechanism
Syntrophic growthMay change with partner organismCould indicate adjustment to interspecies electron transfer
Sulfur limitationPotential upregulationResponse to stress affecting cell envelope maintenance
  • Co-expression analysis: Unlike Geobacter species where cytochrome genes increase during Fe(III) reduction, P. carbinolicus shows increased expression of genes encoding thioredoxins, transport proteins, and NAD(FAD)-dependent dehydrogenases . Analysis of LspA expression should consider co-expression with these genes, which may indicate functional relationships.

  • Regulatory elements: Examine the promoter region of P. carbinolicus lspA for potential binding sites of transcription factors known to respond to changes in electron acceptor availability, sulfur metabolism, or cell envelope stress.

What structural and functional differences might exist between P. carbinolicus LspA and homologs from better-characterized organisms?

Based on comparative genomic and structural information, several potential differences can be anticipated between P. carbinolicus LspA and homologs from well-studied organisms:

  • Substrate specificity adaptations:

    • P. carbinolicus encodes autotransporters and various appendages that may represent unique lipoprotein substrates

    • The signal sequences of these lipoproteins might have specific features recognized by P. carbinolicus LspA

  • Membrane interaction adaptations:

    • P. carbinolicus has a unique metabolism that may result in distinctive membrane composition

    • The periplasmic helix (PH) of LspA, which shows significant conformational dynamics , might exhibit organism-specific properties

  • Predicted structural differences:

RegionPotential DifferenceFunctional Implication
Periplasmic helixAltered flexibility or conformational equilibriumModified substrate recognition or binding kinetics
β-cradleSequence variations in non-conserved residuesAltered substrate specificity while maintaining catalytic function
Active site peripheryConservative substitutionsFine-tuning of substrate specificity while preserving catalytic mechanism
Transmembrane regionsAdaptations to P. carbinolicus membrane environmentOptimized membrane integration and stability
  • Cofactor requirements:

    • Given P. carbinolicus' requirement for sulfur during Fe(III) reduction , its LspA might have evolved specific interactions with sulfur metabolism components

Understanding these differences would require structural studies specifically on P. carbinolicus LspA, compared with existing structures from P. aeruginosa and S. aureus LspA .

How can researchers correlate LspA dynamics with the unique electron transfer mechanisms in P. carbinolicus?

P. carbinolicus employs an indirect Fe(III) reduction mechanism involving sulfur, distinct from the direct reduction mechanism of Geobacter species . To investigate potential connections between LspA function and this unique electron transfer system:

  • Membrane organization studies:

    • Compare membrane protein organization in P. carbinolicus versus Geobacter

    • Map the spatial relationship between LspA and components of the electron transfer machinery

    • Analyze lipid raft or membrane domain co-localization

  • Sulfur-dependence investigation:

Experimental ApproachMeasurementsExpected Insights
Growth experiments with LspA variantsGrowth rates with different sulfur sourcesConnection between LspA function and sulfur metabolism
Redox state analysis of LspAOxidation state of relevant cysteine residuesPotential redox regulation of LspA activity
Protein-protein interaction studiesPull-down or crosslinking with sulfur metabolism componentsDirect physical interactions within metabolic network
  • Comparative dynamics in different redox environments:

    • Use EPR and MD approaches to characterize LspA dynamics under conditions mimicking different redox states

    • Determine if conformational equilibria shift with changing sulfur availability or redox potential

    • Test if electron transfer components affect LspA dynamics directly or indirectly

  • Systems biology integration:

    • Correlate transcriptomic data for LspA with genes involved in Fe(III) reduction and sulfur metabolism

    • Perform metabolic flux analysis to map connections between lipoprotein processing and electron transfer

    • Develop predictive models of how LspA activity might influence or be influenced by electron transfer capabilities

These approaches would help elucidate whether LspA function is merely coincidental to or functionally integrated with P. carbinolicus' unique electron transfer mechanisms.

How might genetic engineering of P. carbinolicus LspA contribute to developing novel antibiotic targets?

LspA represents an excellent target for antibiotic development because it is essential in Gram-negative bacteria, important for virulence in Gram-positive bacteria, and shows minimal development of antibiotic resistance . Engineering approaches with P. carbinolicus LspA could provide several advantages:

  • LspA mutant libraries:

    • Generate site-directed mutants targeting conserved residues

    • Screen for altered sensitivity to known LspA inhibitors like globomycin

    • Identify mutations that enhance or reduce inhibitor binding without compromising enzymatic function

  • Structure-activity relationship studies:

Engineering ApproachExpected OutcomeAntibiotic Development Implication
Active site modificationsAltered substrate specificityNew insights for designing selective inhibitors
PH dynamics alterationChanged conformational equilibriumPotential for allosteric inhibitor development
Hybrid LspA constructsDomain-swapped variants with altered propertiesIdentification of species-specific targeting determinants
  • P. carbinolicus as a unique model system:

    • Due to its distinct electron transfer mechanisms , P. carbinolicus might provide insights into designing antibiotics targeting organisms with similar metabolic features

    • The organism's unique sulfur requirement could identify potential synergistic targets combining LspA inhibition with sulfur metabolism disruption

  • Resistance mechanism studies:

    • Directed evolution experiments under antibiotic pressure

    • Identification of potential resistance mechanisms specific to P. carbinolicus

    • Preemptive development of next-generation inhibitors addressing these mechanisms

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.