HemC (porphobilinogen deaminase, EC 4.3.1.8) is the third enzyme in the heme pathway, responsible for polymerizing four PBG molecules into a linear tetrapyrrole (HMB). This reaction is essential for porphyrin ring formation . In Pelobacter carbinolicus, a close relative of P. propionicus, the hemC gene (PCAR3063) is part of an operon with hemA (glutamyl-tRNA synthase) and hemD (uroporphyrinogen-III synthase) . While transcriptional data for P. propionicus is unavailable, P. carbinolicus shows constitutive expression of hemC during acetoin fermentation and Fe(III) reduction .
Key Reaction:
In P. carbinolicus, the hemACD operon (PCAR3062–PCAR3067) includes:
| Gene | Product | Expression (Acetoin) |
|---|---|---|
| hemA | Glutamyl-tRNA synthase | + |
| hemC | Porphobilinogen deaminase | ND |
| hemD | Uroporphyrinogen-III synthase | ND |
ND: Not determined .
This operon’s conservation suggests similar organization in P. propionicus, though experimental validation is needed.
While P. propionicus HemC has not been purified recombinantly, related studies provide benchmarks:
Genetic manipulation of Pelobacter species remains challenging due to inefficient homologous recombination systems . Successful recombinant expression in related organisms (e.g., Propionibacterium freudenreichii) involves:
Cloning hemC into expression vectors (e.g., pET28a).
Optimizing codon usage for E. coli hosts.
Biotechnology: Engineering propionic acid-producing strains via heme pathway modulation .
Medical Research: Studying porphyrias using bacterial HemC as a model .
KEGG: ppd:Ppro_3375
STRING: 338966.Ppro_3375
Porphobilinogen deaminase (PBGD), encoded by the hemC gene, is the third enzyme in the heme biosynthesis pathway. It catalyzes the polymerization of four porphobilinogen (PBG) molecules to form hydroxymethylbilane, which is subsequently converted to uroporphyrinogen III. This enzyme plays a critical role in the production of heme, which is essential for various cytochromes involved in electron transport and other metabolic processes.
In bacteria like Pelobacter propionicus, hemC is part of the anaerobic heme biosynthesis pathway that enables the organism to produce c-type cytochromes. Analysis of genome sequences from related species such as Pelobacter carbinolicus has revealed the presence of genes for heme biosynthesis and cytochrome c biogenesis, all of which are expressed during growth . The expression of these genes allows Pelobacter species to synthesize functional c-type cytochromes despite previous studies failing to detect them in these organisms .
PBGD has a unique structure featuring a covalently bound dipyrromethane cofactor that serves as a reaction primer for the polymerization of PBG molecules. This cofactor is attached to the enzyme and acts as the starting point for the sequential addition of the four PBG substrate molecules.
The enzyme forms distinct intermediate complexes (ES, ES2, and ES3) during the catalytic cycle, corresponding to the sequential addition of substrate molecules to the growing pyrrole chain . These intermediates can be detected experimentally, providing insights into the reaction mechanism. The enzyme typically has a molecular weight of approximately 33-35 kDa, as demonstrated in studies of Escherichia coli PBGD where gel filtration and SDS-PAGE analysis yielded values of 32,000 and 35,000, respectively . This molecular weight corresponds well with the gene-derived molecular weight of 33,857 for the E. coli enzyme .
The heme biosynthesis pathway in anaerobic bacteria like Pelobacter species differs from that in aerobic organisms primarily in the oxygen-dependent steps. Pelobacter carbinolicus, a close relative of P. propionicus, possesses oxygen-independent enzymes for heme biosynthesis, reflecting its anaerobic lifestyle.
Specifically, P. carbinolicus contains HemG (encoded by PCAR0772), an oxygen-independent protoporphyrinogen oxidase that catalyzes the penultimate step in heme biosynthesis, rather than the oxygen-dependent HemY . Similarly, it contains HemN (encoded by PCAR0110), an oxygen-independent coproporphyrinogen III oxidase, instead of the oxygen-dependent form, HemF .
The porphobilinogen deaminase step (catalyzed by hemC) is common to both aerobic and anaerobic pathways, but the enzyme may have adapted to function optimally in the reducing environment characteristic of anaerobic bacteria.
For recombinant expression of P. propionicus hemC, E. coli-based expression systems are typically most effective. Based on successful strategies for related enzymes, the following approach is recommended:
Vector selection: pET-based vectors containing T7 promoter systems allow for controlled, high-level expression.
Host strains: E. coli BL21(DE3) or derivatives like Rosetta(DE3) for handling potential rare codon usage.
Expression conditions: Induction with 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG at mid-logarithmic phase followed by expression at lower temperatures (16-25°C) to enhance proper folding.
The expression level can be monitored by SDS-PAGE, with PBGD typically appearing as a band at approximately 34-35 kDa, consistent with findings from E. coli PBGD studies where the enzyme was shown to have a molecular weight of 35,000 by SDS-PAGE .
A multi-step purification protocol is recommended for obtaining high-purity, active recombinant P. propionicus hemC:
Initial clarification: Cell lysis followed by centrifugation to remove cellular debris.
Affinity chromatography: If the recombinant protein includes a His-tag, immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using Ni-NTA resin is effective.
Ion exchange chromatography: Based on the isoelectric point of E. coli PBGD (pI 4.5) , anion exchange chromatography at pH 8.0 can further purify the protein.
Size exclusion chromatography: As a final polishing step to remove aggregates and obtain homogeneous protein.
Throughout purification, it is essential to include stabilizing agents such as glycerol (10-20%) and reducing agents to maintain enzyme activity. The purified enzyme should be stored at -80°C in small aliquots to prevent freeze-thaw cycles that could compromise activity.
The dipyrromethane cofactor is critical for PBGD catalytic activity. Several methods can be used to confirm its presence in purified recombinant enzyme:
Enzymatic activity assay: Measure the conversion of porphobilinogen to hydroxymethylbilane, which can be monitored spectrophotometrically.
UV-visible spectroscopy: The dipyrromethane cofactor gives PBGD characteristic absorption features.
Mass spectrometry: To confirm the presence of the covalently bound dipyrromethane cofactor, which should cause a specific mass shift compared to the apoprotein.
Formation of enzyme-substrate intermediates: The ability of the enzyme to form ES, ES2, and ES3 complexes indicates proper cofactor incorporation.
Absence of the dipyrromethane cofactor would result in an inactive enzyme, as this cofactor serves as the reaction primer for the polymerization of PBG molecules.
While specific kinetic parameters for P. propionicus PBGD have not been directly reported in the available literature, they can be estimated based on those of related enzymes:
Km for porphobilinogen: Expected to be in the range of 10-30 μM, similar to the E. coli enzyme which has a Km of 19 ± 7 μM .
pH optimum: Likely around 7.5-8.0, consistent with the E. coli enzyme.
Temperature optimum: Probably 30-37°C, reflecting the mesophilic nature of P. propionicus.
The kinetic properties of PBGD are influenced by the formation of enzyme-substrate intermediates (ES, ES2, ES3) during the reaction cycle, as observed in the E. coli enzyme . These intermediates represent the sequential addition of PBG molecules to the growing pyrrole chain.
For accurate determination of PBGD activity in vitro, several complementary methods can be employed:
Spectrophotometric assay: The classic method involves monitoring the formation of uroporphyrin I (after chemical cyclization of hydroxymethylbilane) at 405-410 nm.
HPLC analysis: For direct quantification of reaction products.
Fluorescence detection: Utilizing the natural fluorescence of porphyrins to detect product formation with high sensitivity.
Coupled enzyme assays: Where the product of the PBGD reaction serves as a substrate for a subsequent enzyme with more easily measured activity.
When performing these assays, it is essential to include appropriate controls:
Enzyme concentration dependence to ensure linearity
Time-course measurements to confirm initial rate conditions
Substrate concentration series to determine Michaelis-Menten parameters
Heat-inactivated enzyme as a negative control
To investigate structure-function relationships in P. propionicus PBGD, researchers can use several approaches:
Homology modeling: Creating a structural model based on known PBGD structures from other organisms, such as E. coli, to predict important structural features.
Site-directed mutagenesis: Systematically altering key residues predicted to be involved in catalysis, substrate binding, or cofactor attachment.
Chimeric proteins: Creating fusion proteins between P. propionicus PBGD and well-characterized PBGDs to identify domain-specific functions.
Structural analysis: Using techniques such as X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM to determine the actual structure, potentially with various ligands or at different stages of the catalytic cycle.
Biophysical characterization: Employing circular dichroism, fluorescence spectroscopy, or thermal shift assays to assess structural stability and conformational changes.
These approaches can reveal how specific structural elements contribute to the enzyme's catalytic mechanism, substrate specificity, and stability.
The dipyrromethane cofactor in PBGD plays a crucial role as the reaction primer for the polymerization of PBG molecules. It is covalently bound to the enzyme and serves as the starting point for the sequential addition of the four substrate molecules.
During recombinant expression, the cofactor is typically synthesized by the host cells through their endogenous heme biosynthesis pathway. To ensure proper cofactor incorporation:
The expression host (usually E. coli) must have a functional heme biosynthesis pathway.
Supplementing the growth medium with δ-aminolevulinic acid (a precursor in heme biosynthesis) may enhance cofactor formation.
Expression conditions (temperature, aeration, etc.) should be optimized to support cofactor synthesis.
Co-expression with other heme biosynthesis enzymes might improve cofactor incorporation.
The presence of the cofactor can be confirmed by enzymatic activity assays and spectroscopic methods, as its absence would result in an inactive enzyme.
PBGD typically functions as a monomer, with a molecular weight of approximately 33-35 kDa, as determined for the E. coli enzyme by gel filtration (32,000) and SDS-PAGE (35,000) . The monomeric nature of the enzyme is consistent with its gene-derived molecular weight of 33,857 .
The monomeric structure of PBGD is important for its function because:
It allows for the necessary conformational changes during the catalytic cycle to accommodate the growing polypyrrole chain.
The active site, containing the dipyrromethane cofactor, is formed within a single protein chain.
The sequential addition of PBG molecules requires specific orientation of the substrate and growing product, which is facilitated by the three-dimensional arrangement of the enzyme.
While PBGD generally functions as a monomer, potential protein-protein interactions with other enzymes in the heme biosynthesis pathway could influence its activity in vivo, though specific evidence for such interactions in P. propionicus is currently limited.
Evidence for the expression of heme biosynthesis genes, including hemC, in Pelobacter species comes primarily from studies on P. carbinolicus, a close relative of P. propionicus. Key findings include:
Transcript detection: Analysis of the P. carbinolicus genome revealed 14 open reading frames that could encode c-type cytochromes, and transcripts for almost all of these were detected during growth .
Growth condition-specific expression: Some cytochrome genes were expressed specifically during Fe(III) reduction but not during fermentation, suggesting specialized roles .
Heme biosynthesis gene expression: Genes required for heme biosynthesis, including hemA, hemL, hemB, and hemH, were shown to be expressed during fermentative growth .
Cytochrome c biogenesis genes: These were also expressed, confirming the molecular machinery for cytochrome production is active .
These findings suggest that hemC would similarly be expressed in P. propionicus, particularly under conditions requiring cytochrome production.
PBGD contributes to electron transport and energy metabolism in Pelobacter species through its role in heme biosynthesis, which is essential for cytochrome production. The importance of this role is evidenced by:
Expression during Fe(III) reduction: In P. carbinolicus, several cytochrome genes were expressed specifically during Fe(III) reduction, indicating their role in this form of anaerobic respiration .
Cytochrome detection: Protein analysis revealed heme-staining bands in P. carbinolicus, confirming the presence of c-type cytochromes .
Potential involvement in propionate formation: While not directly involved, the electron transport chain components produced via the heme biosynthesis pathway may support the unique metabolism of P. propionicus, which ferments ethanol to propionate .
The heme groups synthesized through the pathway involving PBGD become incorporated into cytochromes, which then participate in electron transfer processes essential for energy conservation during both fermentative and respiratory metabolism.
Comparative analysis of hemC genes and heme biosynthesis pathways reveals interesting differences between Pelobacter and related genera:
Cytochrome abundance: Pelobacter species have fewer cytochrome genes compared to Geobacter and Desulfuromonas species, which have abundant c-type cytochromes .
Heme content: The ratio of heme-stained protein to total protein is much smaller in Pelobacter carbinolicus than in Geobacter sulfurreducens .
Cytochrome diversity: Many of the c-type cytochromes that are required for optimal Fe(III) reduction in G. sulfurreducens were not present in the P. carbinolicus genome .
These differences suggest that while Pelobacter species possess functional heme biosynthesis pathways, including hemC, they have evolved a metabolism less dependent on diverse c-type cytochromes compared to their close relatives. This may reflect their adaptation to fermentative metabolism rather than relying primarily on metal reduction for energy conservation.
Recombinant P. propionicus PBGD can serve as a valuable tool in several research contexts:
Metabolic engineering: Manipulating hemC expression could alter cytochrome production, potentially enhancing electron transport capabilities in engineered strains.
Comparative biochemistry: Characterizing the properties of PBGD from an anaerobe like P. propionicus can provide insights into adaptations to anaerobic environments.
Synthetic biology: Incorporating P. propionicus hemC into designer pathways for specialized metabolism or bioremediation.
Evolutionary studies: Comparing the properties of hemC from different anaerobes can illuminate the evolution of heme biosynthesis pathways.
Bioelectrochemical applications: Understanding cytochrome production and electron transport in Pelobacter can inform the development of microbial fuel cells.
For these applications, having a well-characterized recombinant PBGD provides a controlled system for investigating specific aspects of anaerobic metabolism without the complications of whole-organism studies.
Several strategies can be employed to engineer modified versions of P. propionicus PBGD with enhanced properties:
Rational design approaches:
Site-directed mutagenesis of residues involved in substrate binding or catalysis
Stabilizing mutations to enhance thermal or pH stability
Modification of surface residues to improve solubility
Directed evolution:
Error-prone PCR to generate variant libraries
DNA shuffling with hemC genes from related species
Selection or screening for desired properties (activity, stability, etc.)
Computational design:
Molecular dynamics simulations to identify regions that might be stabilized
In silico prediction of beneficial mutations
Homology modeling to guide rational design efforts
Domain swapping:
Creating chimeric enzymes with domains from PBGDs of different species
Testing functional complementation in vivo
These approaches could yield PBGD variants with improved catalytic efficiency, thermostability, solubility, or other desirable properties for research or biotechnological applications.
Studies of P. propionicus PBGD can contribute to understanding porphyrias in several ways:
Model system: Bacterial PBGD serves as a simpler model for understanding the enzymatic defects underlying acute intermittent porphyria (AIP), which is caused by mutations in human PBGD.
Structure-function insights: Detailed characterization of the bacterial enzyme can reveal fundamental aspects of PBGD function that are relevant to human health.
Therapeutic development: Recombinant PBGD could potentially be developed for enzyme replacement therapy in AIP, similar to approaches being evaluated for other metabolic disorders. Research in AIP mouse models has shown promise for both enzyme substitution and gene therapy approaches .
Screening platform: Bacterial PBGD can be used to screen for small molecules that enhance enzyme activity or stability, potentially leading to novel treatments for certain forms of porphyria.
Protein engineering: Insights from bacterial PBGD engineering could inform the development of stabilized human PBGD variants for therapeutic use.
While bacterial and human PBGDs differ in some aspects, the core catalytic mechanism and many structural features are conserved, making bacterial studies valuable for understanding the human enzyme.
Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when expressing recombinant PBGD:
Inclusion body formation:
Challenge: The recombinant protein may aggregate in insoluble inclusion bodies.
Solution: Lower expression temperature (16-20°C), reduce IPTG concentration, or use solubility-enhancing fusion tags.
Cofactor incorporation issues:
Challenge: Insufficient incorporation of the dipyrromethane cofactor.
Solution: Supplement growth media with δ-aminolevulinic acid as a precursor for cofactor synthesis.
Low expression levels:
Challenge: Poor expression due to codon bias or toxicity.
Solution: Optimize codon usage for the host or use specialized expression strains.
Protein degradation:
Challenge: Proteolytic degradation during expression or purification.
Solution: Use protease-deficient host strains and include protease inhibitors during purification.
Loss of activity during purification:
Challenge: The enzyme loses activity during purification steps.
Solution: Include reducing agents and stabilizers in all buffers, work at 4°C, and minimize exposure to light.
Addressing these challenges requires systematic optimization of expression and purification conditions, with activity assays at each step to track enzyme functionality.
To distinguish between active and inactive forms of recombinant PBGD, researchers can use:
Enzymatic activity assay: Measure the conversion of porphobilinogen to hydroxymethylbilane. This direct assay of catalytic function is the most definitive method.
Detection of reaction intermediates: Active PBGD forms ES, ES2, and ES3 complexes during catalysis , which can be detected by specific methods.
Spectroscopic analysis: Active PBGD with the dipyrromethane cofactor has characteristic spectral properties distinct from the inactive form.
Substrate binding analysis: Even if catalytically compromised, the enzyme may retain substrate binding capacity, which can be assessed using binding assays.
Thermal shift assay: Active enzyme typically shows a different thermal denaturation profile compared to inactive forms due to stabilization by the cofactor.
A combination of these approaches provides a comprehensive assessment of enzyme functionality, distinguishing truly active enzyme from structurally intact but catalytically impaired forms.
Essential controls for PBGD activity characterization include:
Negative controls:
Heat-inactivated enzyme to establish baseline
Reaction mixture without enzyme
Reaction mixture without substrate
Enzyme with known inhibitors
Positive controls:
Well-characterized PBGD from another source (e.g., E. coli)
Synthetic or pre-measured standards of the reaction product
Validation controls:
Enzyme concentration series to confirm linearity
Time course measurements to ensure initial rate conditions
Substrate concentration series to determine kinetic parameters
Specificity controls:
Testing substrate analogs to confirm enzyme specificity
Performing the reaction under different conditions (pH, temperature)
Quality controls:
Purity assessment of both enzyme and substrate
Multiple methods for protein concentration determination
These controls ensure that observed activity is specifically due to the catalytic action of recombinant PBGD and not experimental artifacts or contaminating activities.