Recombinant Pelodictyon phaeoclathratiforme Elongation factor G (fusA), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will preferentially ship the format we have in stock. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering, and we will fulfill your request.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs by default. For dry ice shipping, please contact us in advance; additional fees will apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to collect the contents at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50% for your reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Generally, the liquid form has a shelf life of 6 months at -20°C/-80°C, while the lyophilized form has a shelf life of 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process. If you require a specific tag type, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing it.
Synonyms
fusA; Ppha_0286Elongation factor G; EF-G
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Pelodictyon phaeoclathratiforme (strain DSM 5477 / BU-1)
Target Names
fusA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein catalyzes the GTP-dependent ribosomal translocation step during translation elongation. The ribosome transitions from the pre-translocational (PRE) to the post-translocational (POST) state. The newly formed A-site-bound peptidyl-tRNA and P-site-bound deacylated tRNA move to the P and E sites, respectively. The protein facilitates the coordinated movement of the two tRNA molecules, the mRNA, and conformational changes within the ribosome.
Database Links
Protein Families
TRAFAC class translation factor GTPase superfamily, Classic translation factor GTPase family, EF-G/EF-2 subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Pelodictyon phaeoclathratiforme and why is it significant for research?

Pelodictyon phaeoclathratiforme is a green sulfur bacterium belonging to the Chlorobiaceae family. This organism occupies a unique ecological niche compared to other green sulfur bacteria such as Chlorobium tepidum. It has been the subject of taxonomic debate, with recent proposals suggesting that the genera Chlorobium and Pelodictyon may be synonymous . P. phaeoclathratiforme BU-1 (also designated as strain DSM 5477) has been fully sequenced, revealing distinctive protein families that reflect its adaptation to specific environmental conditions . The organism is significant for research into bacterial evolution, photosynthetic mechanisms in anoxygenic phototrophs, and adaptation to specialized ecological niches.

What is Elongation factor G (fusA) and what is its function in bacterial cells?

Elongation factor G (EF-G), encoded by the fusA gene, is a critical component of the bacterial protein synthesis machinery. It functions during the elongation phase of translation, specifically catalyzing the translocation step where the ribosome moves along the mRNA after peptide bond formation. This GTPase protein works in concert with other translation factors such as Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) . In green sulfur bacteria like P. phaeoclathratiforme, EF-G maintains this essential function while potentially exhibiting specialized characteristics adapted to the organism's unique physiological conditions.

How does the protein structure of P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G compare to other bacterial homologs?

The P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G maintains the conserved domains found in bacterial translocation factors while potentially exhibiting unique adaptations. While specific structural data for P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G is limited in the available literature, comparative analyses of EF-G across bacterial species typically reveal a multi-domain protein with five distinct domains (I-V). Domain I contains the GTP-binding site essential for its function, while domains II-V participate in interactions with the ribosome during translocation . In P. phaeoclathratiforme, sequence-based protein family analysis has revealed numerous protein families exhibiting 1:1 putative orthology with C. tepidum (1468 families) , suggesting conservation of essential proteins like EF-G between these related species.

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G?

Based on established protocols for similar recombinant proteins, Escherichia coli-based expression systems represent the most practical approach for producing recombinant P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G. When designing an expression system, researchers should consider:

  • Codon optimization: Green sulfur bacteria may have different codon usage patterns than E. coli, potentially requiring codon optimization for efficient expression.

  • Expression vector selection: Vectors containing T7 or similar strong promoters with tight regulation capabilities are generally recommended.

  • Fusion tags: A histidine tag (6xHis) is commonly used for purification purposes, though researchers should evaluate whether N-terminal or C-terminal tagging less disrupts protein function .

  • Expression conditions: Lower temperatures (16-25°C) and reduced IPTG concentrations often improve the solubility of recombinant elongation factors.

The recombinant protein production should be followed by appropriate purification steps, typically involving affinity chromatography, to obtain sufficient quantities of functional protein for downstream analyses.

What are the optimal storage conditions for maintaining stability of recombinant P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G?

For optimal stability, recombinant P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G should be stored in a Tris-based buffer supplemented with 50% glycerol at -20°C for routine storage, or at -80°C for extended preservation . Several important considerations should guide storage protocols:

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can lead to protein denaturation and loss of activity.

  • For working stocks, small aliquots can be maintained at 4°C for up to one week to minimize freeze-thaw damage .

  • Buffer composition should be optimized specifically for EF-G stability, potentially including stabilizing agents such as DTT or β-mercaptoethanol to prevent oxidation of cysteine residues.

  • Assessment of protein stability through activity assays after various storage periods is recommended to establish the practical storage limits for specific experimental applications.

How can functional assays be designed to assess the translocation activity of recombinant P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G?

Designing robust functional assays for P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G requires consideration of both established translocation assays and the unique characteristics of green sulfur bacteria. Recommended methodological approaches include:

These assays should be conducted under conditions that account for the native environment of P. phaeoclathratiforme, potentially including adjustments to salt concentration, pH, and temperature to reflect its ecological niche.

What structural and functional differences might be expected between EF-G from P. phaeoclathratiforme and other green sulfur bacteria?

The structural and functional differences between EF-G from P. phaeoclathratiforme and other green sulfur bacteria like C. tepidum would likely reflect their adaptation to different ecological niches . While comprehensive structural studies specifically on P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G are not available in the search results, several hypotheses can be formulated based on comparative genomics:

  • Domain Conservation: The catalytic domains (particularly the GTP-binding domain) would likely show high conservation across green sulfur bacteria, as these are essential for the basic function of translocation.

  • Surface Residue Adaptations: Surface-exposed residues might show greater variability, potentially reflecting adaptations to different cytoplasmic environments or interactions with slightly different ribosomal components.

  • Thermal Stability: Depending on the temperature ranges of their respective habitats, the proteins may exhibit different thermal stability profiles, potentially through modifications in salt bridge networks or hydrophobic core packing.

  • Post-translational Modifications: Differential patterns of post-translational modifications might exist, affecting regulation and interaction networks.

Comparative genomic analysis shows that P. phaeoclathratiforme has several unique protein families not found in C. tepidum, reflecting its adaptation to different environmental conditions . While EF-G is likely to be highly conserved due to its essential function, subtle differences may exist that optimize its performance under the specific conditions where P. phaeoclathratiforme thrives.

What common challenges arise when working with recombinant elongation factors from green sulfur bacteria and how can they be addressed?

Several technical challenges commonly arise when working with recombinant elongation factors from green sulfur bacteria:

  • Protein Solubility Issues:

    • Challenge: Formation of inclusion bodies during expression

    • Solution: Reduce expression temperature (16-18°C), decrease inducer concentration, use solubility-enhancing fusion tags (SUMO, MBP), or employ specialized E. coli strains designed for improved folding

  • Protein Activity Preservation:

    • Challenge: Loss of GTPase activity during purification

    • Solution: Include GTP or non-hydrolyzable GTP analogs in purification buffers, minimize exposure to oxidizing conditions, and perform activity assays immediately after purification

  • Ribosome Compatibility for Functional Assays:

    • Challenge: Incompatibility between P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G and ribosomes from model organisms

    • Solution: Either purify authentic ribosomes from P. phaeoclathratiforme or closely related species, or create chimeric assay systems with careful controls

  • Protein Stability:

    • Challenge: Rapid degradation during storage

    • Solution: Optimize buffer composition with stabilizing agents, store in 50% glycerol, and prepare multiple small aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

A systematic approach to optimization, with careful documentation of conditions and outcomes, is essential for addressing these challenges effectively.

How can researchers differentiate between the function of EF-G (fusA) and other elongation factors like EF-Tu in experimental systems?

Differentiating between EF-G and other elongation factors such as EF-Tu requires carefully designed experimental approaches that exploit their distinct roles in translation:

  • Substrate Specificity:

    • EF-G utilizes GTP but does not bind aminoacyl-tRNAs directly

    • EF-Tu forms a ternary complex with GTP and aminoacyl-tRNAs

    • Assays that measure binding to aminoacyl-tRNAs will be positive for EF-Tu but negative for EF-G

  • Functional Assays:

    • Translocation-specific assays: Pre-translocation complexes with peptidyl-tRNA in the A site will be translocated by EF-G but not EF-Tu

    • tRNA delivery assays: Delivery of aminoacyl-tRNAs to the ribosomal A site occurs with EF-Tu but not EF-G

    • Ribosome recycling assays: EF-G (in concert with ribosome recycling factor) promotes subunit dissociation, while EF-Tu does not

  • Inhibitor Sensitivity:

    • Fusidic acid primarily inhibits EF-G by trapping it on the ribosome after GTP hydrolysis

    • Kirromycin and pulvomycin specifically inhibit EF-Tu function

    • Differential inhibitor sensitivity can help distinguish the activities of these factors

  • Structural Analysis:

    • Despite some architectural similarities, EF-G and EF-Tu have distinct domain organizations that can be distinguished by techniques such as limited proteolysis, circular dichroism, or mass spectrometry

Careful experimental design incorporating these differential characteristics allows researchers to attribute observed activities to the specific elongation factor being studied.

What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing kinetic data from EF-G functional assays?

When analyzing kinetic data from EF-G functional assays, researchers should employ appropriate statistical approaches that account for the complex nature of translocation processes:

  • Enzyme Kinetics Models:

    • For GTPase activity: Michaelis-Menten kinetics analysis to determine Km and kcat parameters

    • For translocation rates: Single or multi-exponential fitting depending on whether translocation follows single or multiple rate-limiting steps

  • Statistical Tests and Analysis Methods:

    • ANOVA with post-hoc tests for comparing multiple experimental conditions

    • Student's t-test (paired or unpaired as appropriate) for direct comparisons between two conditions

    • Non-parametric alternatives (Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis) when data does not meet normality assumptions

  • Experimental Design Considerations:

    • Functional data analysis (FDA) approaches for time-series data, which treat measurements over time as continuous functions rather than discrete points

    • Split-plot experimental designs may be appropriate when testing multiple factors with different levels of experimental precision

  • Data Visualization:

    • Progress curves showing substrate consumption or product formation over time

    • Bar graphs with error bars representing standard deviation or standard error for rate comparisons

    • Box plots for displaying data distribution across experimental replicates

Researchers should ensure sufficient replication (typically n≥3) and include appropriate controls in each experimental series to enable robust statistical analysis.

How can researchers effectively analyze sequence and structural data to understand the evolution of EF-G in green sulfur bacteria?

Effective analysis of sequence and structural data to understand EF-G evolution in green sulfur bacteria requires a multi-faceted approach:

  • Sequence Analysis Techniques:

    • Multiple sequence alignment of EF-G sequences from diverse green sulfur bacteria

    • Phylogenetic tree construction using maximum likelihood or Bayesian methods

    • Calculation of dN/dS ratios to identify regions under purifying or positive selection

    • Analysis of codon usage patterns to identify potential translation optimization strategies

  • Structural Prediction and Analysis:

    • Homology modeling based on crystal structures of EF-G from model organisms

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to assess structural stability under different conditions

    • Identification of conserved functional domains versus variable regions

    • Analysis of surface electrostatics and hydrophobicity patterns

  • Comparative Genomic Approaches:

    • Examination of genomic context of fusA genes across green sulfur bacteria

    • Identification of putative horizontal gene transfer events

    • Analysis of protein family distributions, particularly focusing on the 1468 families exhibiting 1:1 putative orthology between P. phaeoclathratiforme and C. tepidum

  • Integration with Ecological Data:

    • Correlation of sequence/structural features with ecological niches of source organisms

    • Assessment of potential adaptations to specific environmental conditions

This integrated approach allows researchers to develop a comprehensive understanding of how EF-G has evolved within green sulfur bacteria and how its structure-function relationships may reflect adaptation to specific ecological contexts.

How might comparative studies of EF-G across green sulfur bacteria inform our understanding of bacterial adaptation to extreme environments?

Comparative studies of EF-G across green sulfur bacteria can provide significant insights into bacterial adaptation mechanisms:

  • Thermal Adaptation Mechanisms:

    • Analysis of amino acid composition trends in EF-G across species from different temperature niches

    • Identification of specific residue substitutions that contribute to protein stability under extreme conditions

    • Correlation between GTP hydrolysis rates and environmental temperature optima

  • Insights into Translational Adaptation:

    • Examination of how EF-G modifications might contribute to translation efficiency under different growth conditions

    • Investigation of potential co-evolution between EF-G and ribosomal components

    • Analysis of whether translocation rates are optimized for different growth rates in various ecological niches

  • Evolutionary Insights:

    • The conservation of EF-G across diverse green sulfur bacteria, as suggested by the 1468 protein families exhibiting 1:1 putative orthology between P. phaeoclathratiforme and C. tepidum , provides a framework for understanding core cellular functions versus adaptable components

    • Identification of taxonomic relationships based on EF-G sequence analysis may contribute to resolving questions about genus boundaries, such as the proposed synonymy of Chlorobium and Pelodictyon

  • Biotechnological Applications:

    • Discovery of naturally evolved EF-G variants with enhanced stability could inform the development of improved translation systems for biotechnological applications

    • Identification of novel regulatory mechanisms affecting translation in extreme environments

These comparative studies would contribute to our fundamental understanding of bacterial adaptation and potentially yield practical applications in biotechnology and synthetic biology.

What are promising research directions involving P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G that address current gaps in our understanding of bacterial translation?

Several promising research directions involving P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G could address current gaps in our understanding of bacterial translation:

  • Structural Dynamics During Translocation:

    • Cryo-EM studies of P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G bound to ribosomes at different translocation stages

    • Single-molecule FRET analysis to track conformational changes during the translocation cycle

    • Comparison with model organisms to identify conserved mechanistic principles versus adaptive variations

  • Species-Specific Translation Regulation:

    • Investigation of potential unique regulatory mechanisms affecting EF-G function in P. phaeoclathratiforme

    • Analysis of post-translational modifications and their impact on activity

    • Study of interactions between EF-G and potential regulatory partners specific to green sulfur bacteria

  • Ecological Context of Translation Efficiency:

    • Correlation between EF-G properties and growth rates under different environmental conditions

    • Investigation of whether translation in P. phaeoclathratiforme shows adaptations to its specific ecological niche

    • Comparative analysis with the closely related C. tepidum to identify adaptation-specific modifications

  • Taxonomic Implications:

    • Detailed comparison of EF-G and other core proteins between Pelodictyon and Chlorobium species to provide molecular evidence regarding the proposed synonymy of these genera

    • Development of molecular markers based on translation factors that could aid in bacterial classification

  • Methodological Advances:

    • Development of heterologous expression systems optimized for green sulfur bacterial proteins

    • Establishment of in vitro translation systems that incorporate components from P. phaeoclathratiforme

    • Application of emerging techniques like native mass spectrometry to study EF-G interactions with the ribosome and other factors

These research directions would advance our understanding of bacterial translation mechanics while also providing insights into the adaptation of essential cellular processes to specific ecological contexts.

How can researchers address potential experimental artifacts when comparing recombinant EF-G activity with native protein function?

When comparing recombinant EF-G activity with native protein function, researchers should implement several strategies to identify and address potential experimental artifacts:

  • Expression System Considerations:

    • Challenge: Introduction of non-native post-translational modifications or folding issues

    • Solution: Compare multiple expression systems (E. coli, cell-free systems, etc.) and assess functional consistency across preparations

  • Tag Interference Assessment:

    • Challenge: Affinity tags may interfere with protein function

    • Solution: Compare tagged vs. tag-cleaved versions of the protein, and test both N-terminal and C-terminal tag placements to determine optimal configuration

  • Buffer Composition Effects:

    • Challenge: Non-physiological buffer conditions may alter protein behavior

    • Solution: Systematically test activity across a range of pH, salt concentrations, and buffer compositions that approximate the cytoplasmic environment of P. phaeoclathratiforme

  • Ribosome Source Considerations:

    • Challenge: Heterologous ribosomes may interact differently with P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G

    • Solution: Where feasible, isolate authentic ribosomes from P. phaeoclathratiforme or closely related species for comparative studies

  • Control Experiments:

    • Include side-by-side comparisons with well-characterized EF-G proteins from model organisms

    • Perform rate measurements under multiple conditions to identify potentially artifactual behaviors

    • Include negative controls (inactive EF-G mutants) to establish baseline measurements

  • Statistical Validation:

    • Apply rigorous statistical analysis to distinguish real effects from experimental noise

    • Implement functional data analysis approaches for time-series data

    • Ensure sufficient replication across independent protein preparations

By systematically addressing these potential sources of artifacts, researchers can develop greater confidence in their functional characterizations of recombinant P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G.

What approaches can be used to analyze contradictory results in EF-G functional studies?

When faced with contradictory results in EF-G functional studies, researchers should employ a structured analytical approach:

  • Systematic Variation Analysis:

    • Create a comprehensive matrix of experimental variables (protein concentration, buffer composition, temperature, pH, etc.)

    • Systematically test each variable while holding others constant to identify condition-dependent effects

    • Document all experimental parameters meticulously to enable direct comparison across experiments

  • Multiple Methodological Approaches:

    • Apply different assay techniques to measure the same functional parameter

    • For example, measure GTPase activity using both colorimetric assays and radiolabeled GTP methods

    • Compare translocation using both fluorescence-based approaches and chemical footprinting

    • Discrepancies between methods may reveal important mechanistic insights

  • Statistical Reconciliation Techniques:

    • Meta-analysis approaches to integrate data from multiple experiments

    • Application of appropriate statistical models that can account for batch effects and other sources of variability

    • Consideration of functional data analysis (FDA) approaches for analyzing time-series data

  • Collaborative Cross-Validation:

    • Engage with collaborators to independently reproduce key experiments

    • Exchange protein preparations or other reagents to identify preparation-specific artifacts

    • Implement standardized protocols across laboratories

  • Identification of Cryptic Variables:

    • Investigate previously unconsidered factors:

      • Trace contaminants in reagents

      • Microenvironmental effects (surface adsorption, molecular crowding)

      • Instrument-specific biases

  • Computational Modeling:

    • Develop mathematical models of the experimental system

    • Use simulations to test whether contradictory results could emerge from a unified mechanistic framework under different conditions

    • Identify key parameters that might explain the observed discrepancies

Through this systematic approach, researchers can often reconcile apparently contradictory results and develop a more nuanced understanding of P. phaeoclathratiforme EF-G function across different experimental contexts.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.