The black tiger shrimp produces several well-characterized AMPs, including:
These AMPs are regulated by pathways like JAK/STAT and Toll/Imd during infections such as white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) .
While no "tyrosine phenylalanine 2" peptide is documented, recombinant methods for shrimp-derived proteins are well-established:
Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (SAP): Recombinant SAP is produced via E. coli expression systems, with modifications to enhance thermal lability and purity .
Crus-likePm: Expressed in E. coli with a hexa-histidine tag, showing strong antimicrobial activity against Vibrio harveyi .
Nomenclature Issues: The queried peptide may be a newly discovered or alternatively named compound (e.g., CrustinPm1 shares structural motifs with tyrosine-rich peptides).
Pathway Interactions: Peptides like Vago5 and ProPO2 are upregulated via JAK/STAT silencing, suggesting cross-talk between immune pathways .
Technical Barriers: Recombinant production of shrimp peptides faces challenges in proper folding and post-translational modifications .
Transcriptomic/Proteomic Screening: Identify unannotated peptides in P. monodon hemocytes or hepatopancreas.
Functional Assays: Test synthetic tyrosine-phenylalanine dipeptides for antimicrobial or signaling roles.
Comparative Analysis: Cross-reference with peptides from related species (e.g., Pandalus borealis SAP ).
Peptide Tyrosine Phenylalanine 2 is a bioactive peptide identified in the black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon). While direct information about this specific peptide is limited in the current literature, characterization of peptides in P. monodon typically follows standard protocols involving extraction from tissue samples (commonly hemocytes), purification, and sequence analysis using mass spectrometry techniques. Similar to other bioactive peptides identified in P. monodon, such as the crustin-like antimicrobial peptides and serine proteinase inhibitors, it likely has a distinct amino acid sequence with functional domains that determine its biological activity .
Characterization methods often include:
RNA extraction and cDNA library creation from hemocytes
Sequence identification and analysis
Determination of the amino acid composition
Identification of functional domains
Phylogenetic analysis to establish evolutionary relationships
The Escherichia coli expression system is most commonly used for recombinant production of P. monodon peptides due to its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and high yield. Based on successful applications with other P. monodon peptides, the procedure typically involves:
Cloning the coding sequence of the peptide into a suitable expression vector (e.g., pET28b)
Adding an N-terminal hexa-histidine tag for easier purification
Transforming the construct into an appropriate E. coli strain
Optimizing expression conditions (temperature, IPTG concentration, induction time)
Purifying the recombinant protein using affinity chromatography
For example, the crustin-like antimicrobial peptide from P. monodon was successfully expressed using pET28b with an N-terminal hexa-histidine tag in E. coli, resulting in a functional recombinant protein with strong antimicrobial activity . Similarly, a 5-domain Kazal-type serine proteinase inhibitor (SPIPm2) was successfully expressed in the E. coli system, yielding a 32-kDa recombinant protein that maintained its inhibitory activity against various serine proteases .
Verification of recombinant peptide purity and identity involves a multi-step approach:
SDS-PAGE analysis to assess protein size and purity
Western blot analysis using specific antibodies (if available)
Mass spectrometry to confirm the precise molecular weight and sequence
Activity assays to confirm functional properties
For instance, in the case of recombinant SPIPm2 from P. monodon, researchers verified its identity using SDS-PAGE and its activity was confirmed through inhibitory spectrum assays against various serine proteases including trypsin (89% inhibition), chymotrypsin (70% inhibition), and subtilisin (8% inhibition) . Similar approaches would be applicable for verifying recombinant Peptide Tyrosine Phenylalanine 2.
Common challenges include:
Codon optimization: Shrimp codon usage differs from E. coli, potentially leading to poor expression
Protein folding: Many peptides contain multiple cysteine residues forming disulfide bonds, which may not form correctly in bacterial systems
Protein solubility: Recombinant peptides often form inclusion bodies
Cytotoxicity: Some antimicrobial peptides may be toxic to the host cells
Proteolytic degradation: Host proteases may degrade the recombinant peptide
For example, when expressing crustin-like antimicrobial peptides from P. monodon, researchers needed to optimize conditions to overcome potential toxicity to the host cells and ensure proper folding of the peptide with its 12 conserved cysteine residues . Similarly, when expressing insulin-like androgenic gland hormone (IAG) from P. monodon, researchers faced challenges related to proper protein folding and biological activity .
Understanding tissue-specific expression requires comprehensive transcriptomic analysis. Based on studies of other peptides in P. monodon and related species, expression patterns can be analyzed using:
Tissue-specific RT-PCR or qPCR
RNA-Seq data across different tissues
Northern blot analysis
In situ hybridization for spatial localization
Previous studies have shown that many bioactive peptides in P. monodon exhibit tissue-specific expression patterns. For example, SPIPm2 is exclusively expressed in hemocytes, as demonstrated through RT-PCR analysis . Similarly, the crustin-like antimicrobial peptide (Crus-likePm) is abundantly expressed in hemocytes and is highly up-regulated after Vibrio harveyi injection .
Comparative analysis could be performed using an approach similar to that used for neuropeptides in Litopenaeus vannamei, where expression profiles were analyzed using RNA-seq data from various tissues. The expression abundance was quantified by calculating the fragment per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM) and visualized as a heatmap, with red indicating high expression levels and blue denoting lower expression levels .
The genomic organization of peptide genes in P. monodon typically includes regulatory elements in the 5'-flanking regions. For instance, the Crus-likePm gene consists of two exons and one intron, with the 5'-flanking regions containing multiple putative transcription factor binding sites .
To enhance recombinant production:
Identify promoter elements through genomic analysis
Analyze transcription factor binding sites using bioinformatic tools
Engineer expression constructs with optimal regulatory elements
Consider inducible promoter systems for controlled expression
Manipulate culture conditions to activate specific regulatory pathways
A methodological approach would involve:
Isolating the genomic DNA corresponding to the target peptide
Analyzing the 5' regulatory region
Identifying key transcription factor binding sites
Testing various promoter constructs in expression systems
Optimizing culture conditions based on regulatory insights
Structural modeling of peptides provides crucial insights into their functional properties. For P. monodon peptides, this typically involves:
Sequence-based prediction of secondary and tertiary structures
Homology modeling based on related peptides with known structures
Molecular dynamics simulations to assess stability and flexibility
Docking studies to predict protein-protein interactions
Structure-function correlation analysis
For example, protein structure modeling was used in the study of recombinant Pm-IAG to understand its biological activity . Similar approaches could be applied to Peptide Tyrosine Phenylalanine 2 to predict:
Functional domains
Potential binding partners
Mechanism of action
Evolutionary relationships with similar peptides in other species
Investigating the effects on endocrine pathways requires a comprehensive approach:
In vivo trials: Similar to studies with recombinant Pm-IAG, trials would involve:
Transcriptomic analysis: RNA-Seq to identify differentially expressed genes in response to peptide administration, looking for:
Metabolomic analysis: To detect changes in metabolite profiles, particularly those related to hormone signaling pathways. This approach was useful in identifying the role of dopamine and its derivatives in ovarian maturation in P. monodon .
Receptor binding studies: To identify potential receptors and characterize binding affinities, which would be crucial for understanding the mechanism of action.
Contradictory results are common in peptide studies and can be addressed through:
Comparative analysis of experimental conditions: Detailed documentation of all experimental parameters to identify potential sources of variation. For instance, the retrospective comparative analysis performed for IAG studies in P. monodon helped reconcile contrasting results by identifying penaeid-specific duplication in IAG and its receptor .
Sequence and structural analysis: Identifying potential sequence variations or isoforms that might explain functional differences. The identification of duplications in IAG and its receptor in P. monodon, which were not present in paleomonids, suggested neo-functionalization that affected the hormone's activity .
Tissue-specific and developmental stage considerations: Ensuring that the same tissues and developmental stages are compared across studies. For example, the expression of neuropeptides can vary significantly across different developmental stages, as shown in L. vannamei .
Methodological standardization: Developing standardized protocols for:
Peptide expression and purification
Activity assays
Dosing regimens in vivo
Data analysis and interpretation
An optimal experimental design would include:
Preparation Phase:
Expression and purification of the recombinant peptide
Quality control testing (purity, identity, activity)
Preparation of appropriate controls (negative control, positive control with known activity)
In vivo Testing Framework:
| Group | Treatment | Number of Animals | Duration | Sampling Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negative Control (Buffer) | 30 | 4 weeks | Weekly |
| 2 | Low Dose rPeptide | 30 | 4 weeks | Weekly |
| 3 | Medium Dose rPeptide | 30 | 4 weeks | Weekly |
| 4 | High Dose rPeptide | 30 | 4 weeks | Weekly |
| 5 | Positive Control | 30 | 4 weeks | Weekly |
Assessment Parameters:
Physiological responses (growth, molting, reproductive development)
Molecular markers (gene expression changes)
Biochemical parameters (hormone levels, metabolite profiles)
Histological examination of target tissues
This design is inspired by the in vivo testing approaches used for recombinant Pm-IAG, where experimental animals were carefully selected, and various parameters were monitored to assess biological activity .
Optimizing RNA-Seq analysis for identifying regulated genes involves:
Sample Collection and Preparation:
Collect tissues from treated and control animals
Ensure proper preservation to maintain RNA integrity
Extract high-quality total RNA using optimized protocols
Library Preparation and Sequencing:
Construct stranded RNA-Seq libraries
Include biological replicates (minimum 3 per condition)
Sequence to sufficient depth (30-50 million reads per sample)
Data Analysis Pipeline:
Quality control and filtering of raw reads
Alignment to the P. monodon reference genome using HISAT2
Transcript assembly using StringTie
Quantification of gene expression as FPKM (Fragment Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads)
Differential expression analysis comparing treated vs. control samples
Functional annotation and pathway analysis
Validation:
Confirm key findings using qRT-PCR
Validate at the protein level where possible
This approach is similar to the RNA-Seq analysis methods used to identify neuropeptide genes in L. vannamei, which successfully mapped expression profiles across different tissues .
Investigation of immune response roles would include:
In vitro Immune Assays:
Hemocyte culture with recombinant peptide
Assessment of antimicrobial activity against relevant pathogens
Measurement of immune-related enzyme activities (phenoloxidase, lysozyme)
Quantification of reactive oxygen species production
Immune Challenge Studies:
Pre-treatment with recombinant peptide followed by pathogen challenge
Monitoring survival rates and disease progression
Sampling for immune parameter analysis at defined time points
Gene Expression Analysis:
qRT-PCR for immune-related genes
RNA-Seq for global transcriptome changes
Focus on pathways related to antimicrobial peptide production, pattern recognition, and inflammatory response
Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify binding partners
Yeast two-hybrid screening for interacting proteins
Analysis of signaling pathway activation
Similar methodological approaches have been used to study the crustin-like antimicrobial peptide in P. monodon, which showed strong antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including V. harveyi .
Appropriate statistical approaches include:
Regression Analysis:
Nonlinear regression for dose-response curves
Determination of EC50/IC50 values
Analysis of curve parameters (slope, maximum effect)
ANOVA-based Methods:
One-way ANOVA for comparing multiple dose groups
Repeated measures ANOVA for time-course experiments
Post-hoc tests (Tukey's, Dunnett's) for specific comparisons
Mixed-Effects Models:
For handling repeated measurements and hierarchical data structures
Accounting for random effects (tank effects, genetic variation)
Modeling of covariance structures for time-series data
Bayesian Approaches:
For complex experimental designs
When incorporating prior knowledge
For robust parameter estimation with limited sample sizes
Data presentation should include:
Dose-response curves with confidence intervals
Tables of statistical test results
Visualization of time-dependent effects
Structural bioinformatics approaches include:
Sequence-Based Analysis:
Multiple sequence alignment with known receptor-binding peptides
Identification of conserved motifs and binding domains
Prediction of post-translational modifications
Homology Modeling:
Construction of 3D structural models based on related peptides
Refinement and validation of models
Analysis of surface properties and potential binding sites
Molecular Docking:
Virtual screening against potential receptor candidates
Analysis of binding modes and interaction energies
Identification of key residues involved in binding
Molecular Dynamics Simulations:
Assessment of complex stability over time
Analysis of conformational changes upon binding
Calculation of binding free energies
This approach has been valuable in understanding receptor-ligand interactions in P. monodon, as demonstrated in the analysis of insulin-like peptides and their receptors. For example, researchers identified duplications in the IAG receptor unique to P. monodon through careful sequence and structural analysis .
Emerging technologies with significant potential include:
CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing:
Creating knockout models to study peptide function
Introducing reporter constructs for in vivo visualization
Engineering modified peptide variants to study structure-function relationships
Single-Cell Transcriptomics:
Mapping peptide and receptor expression at cellular resolution
Identifying cell populations responsive to peptide signaling
Characterizing heterogeneity in peptide effects
Spatial Transcriptomics/Proteomics:
Visualizing peptide expression and activity in tissue context
Mapping receptor distribution across tissues
Correlating peptide activity with tissue architecture
Advanced Microscopy:
Super-resolution imaging of peptide-receptor interactions
Live imaging of signaling dynamics
Correlative light and electron microscopy for ultrastructural context
Metabolomics and Lipidomics:
Comprehensive profiling of metabolic changes induced by peptide activity
Identification of biomarkers associated with peptide function
Integration with transcriptomic data for pathway analysis
These approaches build upon methodologies that have been successful in studying other peptides in P. monodon, such as the combined transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis used to investigate ovarian maturation .
Investigating developmental differences requires:
Stage-Specific Expression Analysis:
Quantitative PCR across developmental stages
RNA-Seq analysis of stage-specific transcriptomes
Protein quantification using stage-specific samples
Functional Testing Across Stages:
Administration of recombinant peptide to different life stages
Monitoring of stage-specific responses
Identification of windows of sensitivity
Receptor Expression Mapping:
Characterization of receptor expression dynamics across development
Correlation with peptide effects
Identification of stage-specific signaling networks
Comparative Analysis:
Comparison with related species to identify conserved developmental roles
Analysis of evolutionary patterns in developmental function
This approach is supported by studies of neuropeptide expression across developmental stages in L. vannamei, which revealed significant variations in expression patterns . Similar developmental regulation may exist for Peptide Tyrosine Phenylalanine 2 in P. monodon.