Recombinant Phaeosphaeria nodorum Probable endonuclease LCL3 (LCL3)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Our proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us; we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
LCL3; SNOG_04243; Probable endonuclease LCL3
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-296
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Phaeosphaeria nodorum (strain SN15 / ATCC MYA-4574 / FGSC 10173) (Glume blotch fungus) (Parastagonospora nodorum)
Target Names
LCL3
Target Protein Sequence
MRWFGSGDDEKKKKQVGETWADSLRADSWGQSLTNPRTLIPTFAFTITTVTALRLYKTFL RRIPTVNHVKPHYFRRKGIFGKVTTVGDADNFRLYHTPGGRIAGWGWLPWKMVPTKREGL SNQTVGLPCHLGLLSIVSDSPSLVANNFQLHIRLAGVDAPELAHWGREEQPYAKEAQEWL INLIHNRRVRAYIYRRDQYDRIVAQVYVRRWLFRKDVGLEMLKAGLATIYEAKSGAEFGT SEAKYRAAEEKAKAQKVGMWAKPTLLQKLGGASTKAPESPREYKARHAAADKLKKT
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Protein Families
LCL3 family
Subcellular Location
Mitochondrion. Membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is Phaeosphaeria nodorum and why is it significant in plant pathology?

Phaeosphaeria nodorum (also known as Septoria nodorum) is a necrotrophic fungal pathogen that causes Stagonospora nodorum blotch, a significant disease affecting wheat and other cereals. The pathogen is particularly important in agricultural research due to its economic impact on crop yields worldwide. P. nodorum operates through a complex infection mechanism that involves the production of various effector proteins and enzymes that facilitate host tissue colonization and nutrient acquisition . Understanding the molecular basis of P. nodorum pathogenicity is crucial for developing effective disease management strategies in cereal crops.

What is the probable endonuclease LCL3 and what is its predicted function?

The probable endonuclease LCL3 (encoded by the LCL3 gene, also designated as SNOG_04243) is a protein with predicted nuclease activity (EC 3.1.-.-) found in Phaeosphaeria nodorum . Based on sequence analysis and structural predictions, LCL3 likely functions as an endonuclease, an enzyme that cleaves phosphodiester bonds within polynucleotide chains. In fungal pathogens, endonucleases may play roles in various cellular processes including DNA repair, recombination, and potentially in pathogenicity through the degradation of host nucleic acids. The specific biological role of LCL3 in P. nodorum remains an active area of research.

What are the structural characteristics of the LCL3 protein?

The LCL3 protein consists of 296 amino acids with a complete sequence as follows:
MRWFGSGDDEKKKKQVGETWADSLRADSWGQSLTNPRTLIPTFAFTITTVTALRLYKTFLRRIPTVNHVKPHYFRRKGIFGKVTTVGDADNFRLYHTPGGRIAGWGWLPWKMVPTKREGLSNQTVGLPCHLGLLSIVSDSPSLVANNFQLHIRLAGVDAPELAHWGREEQPYAKEAQEWLINLIHNRRVRAYIYRRDQYDRIVAQVYVRWLRRKDVGLEMLKAGLATIYEAKSKAEFGTSEAKYRAAEEKAKAQKVGMWAKPTLLQKLGGASTKAPESPREYKARHAAADKLKKT

The protein likely contains conserved domains characteristic of endonuclease families, though detailed structural studies using X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy would be necessary for confirmation of active sites and catalytic mechanisms.

How should recombinant LCL3 protein be stored and handled for optimal stability?

For optimal stability and activity retention, recombinant LCL3 protein should be stored at -20°C for routine use, or at -80°C for extended storage periods . The protein is typically supplied in a Tris-based buffer containing 50% glycerol, which has been optimized for this specific protein .

To minimize protein degradation:

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, as these can significantly reduce enzyme activity

  • Prepare working aliquots and store them at 4°C for up to one week

  • When thawing frozen stock, use gentle methods such as placing on ice rather than rapid warming

  • Always handle the protein using appropriate protective equipment to prevent contamination

What expression systems are most effective for producing functional recombinant LCL3?

While the search results don't specify the exact expression system used for the commercial recombinant LCL3, based on standard practices for fungal protein expression, several systems can be considered:

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsTypical Yield
E. coliRapid growth, high yield, economicMay lack proper post-translational modifications10-100 mg/L
Yeast (P. pastoris)Eukaryotic processing, secretionLonger production time5-50 mg/L
Insect cellsSuperior folding of complex proteinsHigher cost, technical complexity1-10 mg/L
Fungal hostsNative-like modificationsSpecies-specific optimization neededVariable

For endonucleases like LCL3, expression in eukaryotic systems is often preferable to ensure proper folding and post-translational modifications that may be critical for enzyme activity. Selection of an appropriate tag system during the production process should be considered based on downstream applications and the need for tag removal.

What assays can be used to measure LCL3 endonuclease activity in vitro?

Several methodological approaches can be employed to assess the endonuclease activity of LCL3:

  • Gel-based nuclease assays:

    • Incubate purified LCL3 with DNA or RNA substrates

    • Analyze digestion products via agarose or polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

    • Quantify substrate degradation using densitometry

  • Fluorescence-based assays:

    • Utilize fluorescently labeled oligonucleotides as substrates

    • Measure fluorescence changes upon cleavage (e.g., FRET-based systems)

    • Allows for real-time kinetic measurements

  • Radiolabeled substrate assays:

    • Employ 32P-labeled nucleic acids as substrates

    • Quantify cleavage products via autoradiography or scintillation counting

    • Provides highly sensitive detection of activity

For optimal results, assay conditions should be systematically optimized for pH, temperature, metal ion cofactors (particularly Mg2+ or Mn2+), and salt concentration.

How might LCL3 contribute to the virulence of Phaeosphaeria nodorum?

While the specific role of LCL3 in P. nodorum virulence has not been explicitly detailed in the search results, several hypotheses can be proposed based on knowledge of fungal endonucleases:

  • Host nucleic acid degradation: LCL3 might facilitate the breakdown of host DNA/RNA, providing nucleotides as nutrients for the pathogen.

  • Evasion of host defense responses: The endonuclease activity could potentially target host defense-related nucleic acids, such as RNA involved in pathogen recognition or defense signaling.

  • Contribution to necrotrophic growth: As P. nodorum is a necrotrophic pathogen that kills host tissue before colonization, LCL3 might participate in programmed cell death induction or acceleration of tissue necrosis.

Research investigating the temporal and spatial expression patterns of LCL3 during infection, as well as knockout/knockdown studies, would be necessary to confirm these hypotheses.

What is known about the regulation of LCL3 expression during the infection process?

  • Transcriptome analysis: RNA-seq or qRT-PCR studies comparing LCL3 expression levels across different infection stages, from spore germination to full colonization.

  • Promoter analysis: Characterization of the LCL3 promoter region to identify potential regulatory elements responsive to plant signals or infection-related conditions.

  • Environmental regulation: Assessment of LCL3 expression under various conditions that mimic the infection environment (pH shifts, oxidative stress, nutrient limitation).

Understanding the regulation of virulence factors like LCL3 is particularly important given research showing that P. nodorum epidemics are significantly influenced by both sexual reproduction and airborne ascospores .

How can gene editing techniques be applied to study LCL3 function in Phaeosphaeria nodorum?

Modern gene editing approaches offer powerful tools for investigating LCL3 function:

  • CRISPR-Cas9 mediated knockout:

    • Design sgRNAs targeting the LCL3 coding sequence

    • Generate knockout mutants via homology-directed repair or non-homologous end joining

    • Phenotype mutants for alterations in growth, morphology, and pathogenicity

  • Site-directed mutagenesis:

    • Introduce specific mutations in catalytic residues to create enzymatically inactive variants

    • Compare phenotypes between null mutants and catalytically inactive mutants

    • Distinguish structural from enzymatic roles of the protein

  • Promoter replacement:

    • Replace the native promoter with inducible/repressible systems

    • Enable temporal control of LCL3 expression during infection stages

    • Determine critical timing of LCL3 function during pathogenesis

  • Fluorescent protein tagging:

    • Generate C- or N-terminal fluorescent protein fusions

    • Track subcellular localization during infection process

    • Investigate potential relocalization in response to host signals

These approaches should consider the genetic diversity within P. nodorum populations, as research has shown significant contributions of sexual recombination to pathogen diversity in field conditions .

What protein-protein interaction studies would be valuable for understanding LCL3 function?

Understanding the interactome of LCL3 could provide crucial insights into its biological function:

  • Yeast two-hybrid screening:

    • Use LCL3 as bait to screen for fungal or plant interacting partners

    • Identify potential regulatory proteins or substrates

  • Co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry:

    • Generate antibodies against recombinant LCL3 or use tagged versions

    • Pull down protein complexes from infected plant tissue or fungal cultures

    • Identify interaction partners via LC-MS/MS

  • Bimolecular fluorescence complementation:

    • Validate potential interactions in planta or in fungal cells

    • Visualize where interactions occur subcellularly

  • Protein microarrays:

    • Screen LCL3 against arrays containing plant proteins

    • Identify potential host targets

These interaction studies could reveal whether LCL3 functions independently or as part of larger protein complexes during the infection process.

How conserved is LCL3 across fungal plant pathogens?

Comparative genomic and phylogenetic analyses would be essential to understand the evolutionary history and conservation of LCL3:

  • Sequence homology searches should be conducted using tools like BLAST to identify LCL3 homologs in:

    • Other Phaeosphaeria species

    • Related plant pathogenic fungi

    • More distant fungal lineages

  • Conserved domain analysis:

    • Identify core functional domains that are preserved across species

    • Map variation to potential functional differences

  • Selection pressure analysis:

    • Calculate dN/dS ratios to determine if LCL3 is under purifying or diversifying selection

    • Identify specific residues under selection

  • Structural modeling:

    • Generate homology models of LCL3 orthologs

    • Compare structural conservation versus sequence conservation

The analysis of global diversity in P. nodorum populations could provide context for understanding LCL3 conservation and potential adaptive evolution .

How does LCL3 compare to other known fungal endonucleases?

Comparative analysis of LCL3 with characterized fungal endonucleases would provide insights into its functional classification:

Endonuclease FamilyKey FeaturesModel OrganismsSubstrate Specificity
Holliday junction resolvasesResolve recombination intermediatesVarious fungiStructure-specific
Restriction-like endonucleasesOften sequence-specificDiverse fungiSequence-specific
Non-specific endonucleasesBroad activityMany fungal speciesNon-specific
ssDNA endonucleasesAct on single-stranded regionsVarious eukaryotesStructure-specific

Detailed biochemical characterization of LCL3, including substrate preference (DNA vs. RNA, single- vs. double-stranded), sequence specificity, and cofactor requirements, would be necessary to properly classify this enzyme within known endonuclease families.

What are the most sensitive methods for detecting LCL3 in plant tissues during infection?

Several approaches can be employed to detect and quantify LCL3 during the infection process:

  • Immunological detection:

    • Develop specific antibodies against recombinant LCL3

    • Use western blotting or ELISA for protein quantification

    • Apply immunohistochemistry for in situ localization

  • Transcript quantification:

    • Design specific primers for LCL3 mRNA

    • Employ qRT-PCR for sensitive quantification

    • Consider digital droplet PCR for absolute quantification

  • Activity-based detection:

    • Develop assays that measure specific endonuclease activity in plant extracts

    • Use substrate specificity to distinguish from plant nucleases

  • Mass spectrometry:

    • Use targeted proteomics approaches (MRM/PRM)

    • Identify specific peptide markers unique to LCL3

    • Allows for absolute quantification with labeled standards

These methods should be validated using appropriate controls, including infected tissues from LCL3 knockout mutants as negative controls.

How can recombinant LCL3 be used to develop diagnostic tools for Phaeosphaeria nodorum infection?

Recombinant LCL3 could serve as a valuable tool for developing diagnostics for P. nodorum:

  • Antibody production:

    • Generate poly- or monoclonal antibodies using purified recombinant LCL3

    • Develop immunoassays for field-applicable diagnostics

  • Activity signatures:

    • Characterize the specific enzymatic signature of LCL3

    • Develop activity-based assays for detection in field samples

  • Reference standards:

    • Use purified recombinant LCL3 as calibration standards for quantitative assays

    • Establish detection limits and dynamic ranges

  • Competitive binding assays:

    • If LCL3 has specific substrates or interacting partners

    • Develop competition-based detection methods

Early detection of P. nodorum infection could significantly impact disease management strategies, particularly given the research showing that both sexual and asexual reproduction contribute to disease epidemics .

Could LCL3 serve as a target for developing resistance strategies against Phaeosphaeria nodorum?

If LCL3 plays a significant role in pathogenicity, it could represent a promising target for disease control:

  • Host-induced gene silencing (HIGS):

    • Engineer host plants to express RNAi constructs targeting LCL3

    • Silence the pathogen gene during infection

    • Evaluate impact on disease progression

  • Small molecule inhibitors:

    • Screen for specific inhibitors of LCL3 endonuclease activity

    • Assess efficacy in reducing disease severity

    • Evaluate specificity versus toxicity profiles

  • Development of resistant cultivars:

    • Screen germplasm for varieties that can suppress LCL3 activity

    • Identify plant factors that might neutralize LCL3

  • Combination approaches:

    • Integrate LCL3-targeting strategies with other control measures

    • Assess for synergistic effects in disease management

The efficacy of these approaches would depend on the importance of LCL3 in pathogenicity and the ability of P. nodorum to compensate for its loss or inhibition.

What experimental approaches could evaluate if plant resistance mechanisms target LCL3?

Several experimental strategies could determine if plant resistance mechanisms specifically target LCL3:

  • Protein-protein interaction studies:

    • Screen for plant proteins that directly interact with LCL3

    • Focus on known resistance-related proteins

  • Activity inhibition assays:

    • Test if extracts from resistant plants inhibit LCL3 activity

    • Identify potential inhibitory compounds

  • Localization studies:

    • Compare LCL3 localization in susceptible versus resistant plant varieties

    • Determine if resistant plants sequester or exclude the protein

  • Transcriptional response analysis:

    • Analyze if resistant plants specifically upregulate genes in response to LCL3

    • Identify potential recognition mechanisms

Understanding how plants might naturally target pathogen virulence factors like LCL3 could inform breeding programs and biotechnological approaches to enhance resistance.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.