KEGG: pzu:PHZ_c1737
STRING: 450851.PHZ_c1737
Lipoyl synthase (LipA) is a radical S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) enzyme that catalyzes the insertion of two sulfur atoms into the C-6 and C-8 positions of an octanoyl moiety attached to specific proteins, producing lipoic acid. Lipoic acid is an essential cofactor for the glycine cleavage system (GCS) involved in C1 compound metabolism and for 2-oxoacid dehydrogenases that catalyze the oxidative decarboxylation of 2-oxoacids . This cofactor is found in all domains of life and is crucial for energy metabolism, allowing cells to convert energy from food into forms usable by cells . In bacteria like P. zucineum, LipA plays a vital role in central metabolism by enabling these key enzymatic complexes to function properly.
LipA is classified as a member of the radical SAM superfamily, possessing the conserved sequence motif CX3CX2C that coordinates an iron-sulfur cluster . Most LipA enzymes, including those characterized from model organisms, contain two [4Fe-4S] clusters:
A basic cluster that generates the deoxyadenosyl radical by cleaving S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)
An auxiliary cluster that provides the sulfur atoms for insertion into the octanoyl substrate
The deoxyadenosyl radical initiates the reaction by abstracting a hydrogen atom from the C-6 carbon of the octanoyl group. The resulting carbon radical then reacts with a sulfur atom from the auxiliary [4Fe-4S] cluster, forming a C-S bond . This process occurs at both the C-6 and C-8 positions, followed by the addition of two protons to generate the reduced form of the lipoyl group . The structural arrangement of these clusters and the positioning of the substrate binding pocket are critical for the enzyme's function.
While specific expression systems for P. zucineum LipA are not directly mentioned in the search results, recombinant lipoyl synthases are typically expressed in E. coli systems using vectors that allow for inducible expression, such as pET vectors. Based on protocols used for other LipA enzymes, the following approach can be applied:
Gene cloning: The lipA gene from P. zucineum can be PCR-amplified and cloned into an expression vector with an appropriate affinity tag (His-tag, for example)
Expression conditions: Transformation into an E. coli strain like BL21(DE3) followed by induction with IPTG
Anaerobic conditions: Since LipA contains oxygen-sensitive iron-sulfur clusters, expression and purification are often performed under anaerobic conditions
Reconstitution: Following purification, the enzyme typically requires reconstitution of its iron-sulfur clusters in vitro to ensure full activity
This approach allows for the production of sufficient quantities of recombinant enzyme for biochemical and structural studies.
Reconstitution of iron-sulfur clusters is critical for obtaining catalytically active LipA. Based on studies with other lipoyl synthases, the following methodology can be applied:
Protocol for Iron-Sulfur Cluster Reconstitution:
Anaerobic environment preparation:
Perform all steps in an anaerobic chamber with O₂ levels below 1 ppm
Pre-degas all buffers by sparging with nitrogen or argon
Reduction step:
Treat purified LipA with a reducing agent (typically 5-10 mM DTT) for 30 minutes at 4°C
Cluster assembly:
Add ferric chloride (FeCl₃) or ferrous ammonium sulfate to a final concentration of 8-fold molar excess relative to protein
Add sodium sulfide (Na₂S) to the same concentration
Incubate for 2-4 hours at 4°C with gentle stirring
Removal of excess reconstitution components:
Pass the reconstituted protein through a desalting column equilibrated with anaerobic buffer
Activity verification:
Research has demonstrated that proper reconstitution is essential for LipA activity. In studies with TK2109 and TK2248 proteins from T. kodakarensis, reactions with non-reconstituted proteins showed very low levels of product formation compared to the reconstituted enzymes . This indicates that the procedure to reconstitute [4Fe-4S] clusters is critical for generating an active lipoyl synthase enzyme.
Several complementary approaches can be used to assess LipA activity:
HPLC-Based Activity Assay:
Substrate preparation:
Synthesize an octanoyl-peptide substrate corresponding to the lipoyl domain of the target protein
For P. zucineum, this would typically be derived from its GCS H-protein or E2 subunit sequence
Reaction setup:
Combine reconstituted LipA with:
Octanoyl-peptide substrate (50-200 μM)
S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) (0.5-2 mM)
Sodium dithionite or other electron donor (1-5 mM)
Buffer containing dithiothreitol (DTT)
Analysis:
LC-MS Confirmation:
Analyze reaction products by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
Key masses to monitor:
Octanoyl-peptide: [M+H]⁺ will depend on the specific peptide sequence
Intermediate thiol-octanoyl-peptide: [M+H]⁺ = original octanoyl-peptide mass + 32 Da (one sulfur)
Lipoyl-peptide (oxidized form): [M+H]⁺ = original octanoyl-peptide mass + 64 Da (two sulfurs)
This combination of techniques allows for robust confirmation of LipA activity and can also provide insights into reaction intermediates.
While specific information on P. zucineum LipA is not provided in the search results, comparing its mechanism to well-characterized LipA enzymes can reveal important functional differences:
Comparison of Potential Mechanisms:
Research on M. tuberculosis LipA has shown that the iron-sulfur cluster destroyed during lipoic acid production is replaced by an iron-sulfur carrier protein, NfuA, allowing LipA to continue producing lipoic acid . This represents a unique regeneration mechanism that might be conserved in P. zucineum LipA as well.
P. zucineum LipA likely follows the classical mechanism, but sequence analysis and biochemical characterization would be needed to confirm and identify any unique features of this enzyme.
Based on research with other lipoyl synthases, the following conditions would likely be optimal:
Expression Optimization:
Host strain selection:
Use E. coli strains designed for iron-sulfur protein expression (e.g., BL21(DE3) supplemented with iron)
Consider co-expression with iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis genes (isc or suf operons)
Growth conditions:
Medium: LB or M9 minimal medium supplemented with iron (50-100 μM ferric citrate)
Temperature: Lower temperature (16-18°C) after induction to enhance proper folding
Induction: Low IPTG concentration (0.1-0.2 mM) to prevent inclusion body formation
Duration: Extended expression (16-24 hours) at lower temperature
Anaerobic considerations:
For maximal retention of iron-sulfur clusters, shift cultures to anaerobic conditions after induction
Supplement media with cysteine and ferrous iron under anaerobic conditions
Purification Strategy:
Buffer composition:
Base buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl or HEPES, pH 7.5-8.0
Salt: 150-300 mM NaCl
Reducing agent: 5-10 mM DTT or 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol
Glycerol: 10% to enhance stability
Purification steps:
Affinity chromatography (Ni-NTA for His-tagged protein)
Size exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates
All steps performed anaerobically to preserve iron-sulfur clusters
Storage conditions:
Store in buffer containing 10-20% glycerol at -80°C
Flash-freeze small aliquots in liquid nitrogen
Maintain anaerobic conditions during storage
This approach minimizes oxygen exposure and maximizes the retention of iron-sulfur clusters, which are essential for enzymatic activity.
When facing low activity of recombinant LipA, researchers should consider the following troubleshooting approach:
Systematic Troubleshooting Strategy:
Verify protein integrity:
SDS-PAGE to confirm expected molecular weight
Western blot with anti-His or anti-LipA antibodies
Mass spectrometry to confirm full-length protein
Assess iron-sulfur cluster content:
Measure iron and sulfide content (target: 8 Fe and 8 S per protein)
UV-visible spectroscopy to verify characteristic absorption at ~410 nm
EPR spectroscopy to assess cluster integrity
Color check: properly reconstituted LipA should be brownish
Evaluate reconstitution efficiency:
If iron-sulfur content is low, repeat reconstitution
Try alternative reconstitution methods (chemical vs. enzymatic)
Co-express with iron-sulfur cluster assembly proteins
Optimize assay conditions:
Ensure strictly anaerobic conditions during activity assays
Test different electron donors (sodium dithionite, flavodoxin/flavodoxin reductase)
Vary SAM concentration (0.25-2 mM)
Test different pH values (7.0-8.5)
Add cluster-stabilizing agents (DTT, glutathione)
Address potential inhibition:
Check for inhibitory compounds in the buffer
Ensure SAM quality (commercial SAM can degrade)
Test for product inhibition
Consider co-factors or partner proteins:
Research has shown that even when individual components (like TK2109 or TK2248 proteins from T. kodakarensis) show no activity alone, they may function together as a lipoyl synthase . This highlights the importance of considering protein partnerships in LipA function.
The interaction between LipA and iron-sulfur cluster carrier proteins represents an important area for investigation:
Role and Impact of Carrier Proteins:
Research from Penn State University has demonstrated that an iron-sulfur cluster carrier called NfuA replaces the destroyed iron-sulfur cluster in LipA, allowing it to continue producing lipoic acid . Without this regeneration mechanism, LipA would be a single-turnover enzyme, severely limiting its biological utility.
Methodological Approaches to Study This Interaction:
Co-expression studies:
Clone and co-express P. zucineum LipA with potential carrier proteins (NfuA, IscA, SufA)
Compare activity of LipA expressed alone versus co-expressed with carriers
Measure multiple turnover capability with and without carriers
Protein-protein interaction analysis:
Pull-down assays using tagged LipA to identify interacting partners
Surface plasmon resonance to determine binding kinetics
Crosslinking studies followed by mass spectrometry
Yeast two-hybrid screening to identify novel interaction partners
In vitro reconstitution experiments:
Design a multiple-turnover assay with:
Purified LipA
Octanoyl-peptide substrate in excess
SAM in excess
Electron donor system
± purified carrier protein (NfuA or homologs)
Monitor reaction progress over time to detect cessation of activity
Add carrier protein at different timepoints to observe rescue of activity
Structural studies:
Co-crystallize LipA with carrier protein
Cryo-EM analysis of the complex
HDX-MS (hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry) to map interaction surfaces
Experimental Design for Testing Multiple Turnover:
| Reaction Component | Concentration | Control (-Carrier) | Experimental (+Carrier) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reconstituted LipA | 2-5 μM | ✓ | ✓ |
| Octanoyl-peptide | 200-500 μM | ✓ | ✓ |
| SAM | 1-2 mM | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dithionite | 1-5 mM | ✓ | ✓ |
| DTT | 5 mM | ✓ | ✓ |
| NfuA or homolog | 5-10 μM | - | ✓ |
| Buffer | - | ✓ | ✓ |
Sample at multiple timepoints (0, 15, 30, 60, 120 min) and analyze product formation by HPLC or LC-MS. In the absence of carrier protein, product formation should plateau after a few turnovers as the auxiliary cluster is destroyed. With carrier protein present, sustained product formation would indicate successful cluster replacement and enzyme regeneration .
Cysteine residues in LipA play crucial roles in coordinating iron-sulfur clusters essential for catalysis. Based on information from other lipoyl synthases, we can predict how mutations would affect activity:
Impact of Mutations in Key Motifs:
Methodology to Study Mutational Effects:
Site-directed mutagenesis:
Generate cysteine-to-alanine or cysteine-to-serine mutants for each conserved cysteine
Create single and multiple mutations to assess individual and combined effects
Structural characterization:
Circular dichroism to assess secondary structure changes
Thermal shift assays to determine effects on stability
UV-visible spectroscopy to analyze iron-sulfur cluster incorporation
EPR spectroscopy to assess cluster integrity and environment
Functional assessment:
Quantify iron and sulfur content of purified mutants
In vitro activity assays with octanoyl-peptide substrate
LC-MS analysis to detect reaction intermediates that may accumulate with specific mutations
This systematic approach would provide insights into the structure-function relationships in P. zucineum LipA and could reveal unique features compared to classical LipA enzymes.
Determining and comparing kinetic parameters is essential for understanding the catalytic efficiency of P. zucineum LipA:
Methodology for Kinetic Analysis:
Steady-state kinetics approach:
Vary substrate concentration (octanoyl-peptide): 5-500 μM
Measure initial rates at each concentration
Plot reaction velocity vs. substrate concentration
Determine K<sub>m</sub>, k<sub>cat</sub>, and k<sub>cat</sub>/K<sub>m</sub> using appropriate software
Multiple substrate kinetics:
Vary both octanoyl-peptide and SAM concentrations
Determine if the reaction follows a sequential or ping-pong mechanism
Assess potential cooperativity between substrates
Pre-steady-state kinetics:
Use rapid quench flow or similar techniques to analyze the first turnover
Determine rate constants for individual steps in the reaction
Identify rate-limiting steps
Comparative Analysis Framework:
This comparative approach would help position P. zucineum LipA within the spectrum of bacterial lipoyl synthases and potentially reveal adaptations specific to its ecological niche.
Understanding the environmental parameters that influence LipA activity is crucial for both basic research and optimization of in vitro applications:
Methodological Approach:
Temperature-activity profile:
Conduct activity assays at various temperatures (4°C to 80°C)
Measure initial reaction rates at each temperature
Plot relative activity versus temperature to determine optimum
Thermal stability analysis:
Incubate enzyme at different temperatures for fixed time periods
Measure remaining activity after incubation
Calculate half-life at each temperature
Perform differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to determine melting temperature (T<sub>m</sub>)
pH-activity profile:
Prepare buffers covering pH range 5.0-10.0 (with consistent ionic strength)
Measure enzyme activity at each pH
Plot relative activity versus pH to determine optimum
pH stability profile:
Incubate enzyme at different pH values for fixed time periods
Adjust pH to optimal value before measuring remaining activity
Determine pH range for stability
Combined effects:
Design experiments to test interactions between temperature and pH
Generate 3D contour plots of activity as a function of both parameters
Expected Findings and Implications:
Given what is known about lipoyl synthases from different organisms, we might expect:
Temperature effects:
P. zucineum LipA likely has a temperature optimum reflecting its native environment
The iron-sulfur clusters may become less stable at higher temperatures, affecting activity
Extended incubation at elevated temperatures would likely accelerate cluster degradation
pH effects:
Most lipoyl synthases function optimally at slightly alkaline pH (7.5-8.5)
Extreme pH values could affect iron-sulfur cluster stability
pH may influence substrate binding and product release
Buffer components:
Certain buffer components (phosphate, certain biological buffers) might interact with iron-sulfur clusters
Testing multiple buffer systems at equivalent pH values would be informative
This characterization would provide practical guidelines for handling recombinant P. zucineum LipA and offer insights into its adaptations to its native environment.
Recombinant P. zucineum LipA serves as a valuable tool for elucidating the fundamental mechanisms of lipoic acid biosynthesis:
Research Applications and Methodologies:
Mechanistic studies using substrate analogs:
Synthesize octanoyl-peptides with isotopic labels (¹³C, ²H) at specific positions
Track the fate of labeled atoms using mass spectrometry
Identify reaction intermediates and their structures
Determine the order of sulfur insertion (C-6 vs C-8 position)
Investigation of reaction intermediates:
Study of auxiliary cluster regeneration:
Comparative analysis with novel lipoyl synthases:
Structural studies:
Crystallize P. zucineum LipA with substrates or substrate analogs
Use cryo-EM to visualize the enzyme in different catalytic states
Perform hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify conformational changes during catalysis
These approaches would contribute to the broader understanding of lipoic acid biosynthesis across different bacterial species and potentially reveal novel aspects of the reaction mechanism.
Comparative analysis of P. zucineum LipA with other lipoyl synthases offers valuable evolutionary insights:
Evolutionary Analysis Framework:
Phylogenetic positioning:
Construct phylogenetic trees including LipA sequences from diverse bacterial species
Compare with trees for other lipoic acid metabolism enzymes (LipB, LplA)
Identify potential horizontal gene transfer events
Position P. zucineum LipA relative to classical LipA and novel LipS1/LipS2 systems
Structural conservation analysis:
Co-evolution with partner proteins:
Adaptation to ecological niches:
Compare LipA enzymes from organisms in different environments
Analyze relationships between enzyme properties and habitat
Determine if P. zucineum's lifestyle correlates with specific LipA features
Evolutionary Significance:
The discovery of structurally novel lipoyl synthases in archaea suggests that two distinct types of lipoyl synthases have evolved in nature . P. zucineum LipA analysis could provide insights into:
Whether bacterial lipoyl synthases represent a monophyletic group or if there are multiple evolutionary innovations
How the regeneration mechanism involving carrier proteins evolved
Whether the reaction mechanism is strictly conserved or if variations exist across different bacterial lineages
The evolutionary pressures that shaped the current lipoic acid biosynthesis pathways
This comparative approach would contribute to understanding how this essential metabolic pathway evolved across different domains of life.
Recombinant P. zucineum LipA can serve as a valuable research tool for studying human disorders associated with lipoic acid deficiency:
Research Applications in Biomedical Context:
Model system for human lipoylation defects:
Human lipoic acid deficiency syndromes are associated with mutations in lipoic acid synthesis enzymes
Bacterial LipA can serve as a simpler model system to understand conserved mechanisms
Mutations equivalent to human disease variants can be introduced and studied in the bacterial system
Development of enzymatic assays:
Recombinant P. zucineum LipA could be used to develop assays for:
Screening compounds that enhance lipoyl synthase activity
Testing small molecules that might bypass lipoylation defects
Measuring lipoylation status in biological samples
Investigation of regeneration mechanisms:
Structural insights for drug development:
Structural studies of bacterial LipA can inform the development of drugs targeting human lipoylation pathways
Understanding the active site and catalytic mechanism could aid in designing molecules that enhance lipoylation
Enzyme replacement therapy research:
Engineered bacterial lipoate protein ligase A (lplA) has been shown to restore lipoylation levels, cellular respiration, and growth in lipoylation null cells
Similar approaches could be explored using engineered bacterial LipA to restore lipoic acid synthesis
P. zucineum LipA could serve as a platform for engineering enhanced variants
This translational research direction connects basic biochemical studies of bacterial LipA to potential applications in understanding and addressing human metabolic disorders.
Engineering P. zucineum LipA for improved properties presents several promising research avenues:
Protein Engineering Strategies:
Rational design approaches:
Identify residues in the active site pocket through homology modeling
Introduce mutations to enhance substrate binding (lower K<sub>m</sub>)
Modify residues near the iron-sulfur clusters to improve stability
Engineer enhanced interfaces with carrier proteins to facilitate cluster regeneration
Directed evolution:
Develop a high-throughput screening assay for LipA activity
Generate libraries through error-prone PCR or DNA shuffling
Screen for variants with enhanced thermal stability, catalytic activity, or oxygen tolerance
Combine beneficial mutations identified in different rounds of selection
Domain swapping:
Exchange domains between LipA enzymes from different species
Create chimeric enzymes combining the stability of thermophilic LipA with the activity of mesophilic variants
Explore fusion proteins with carrier proteins to enhance cluster regeneration
Computational design:
Use molecular dynamics simulations to identify regions of flexibility
Apply computational stability prediction algorithms to suggest stabilizing mutations
Model the impact of mutations on cluster coordination and substrate binding
Specific Engineering Targets:
Oxygen tolerance:
Iron-sulfur clusters are oxygen-sensitive, limiting the utility of LipA
Engineer variants with improved oxygen tolerance by:
Creating more shielded environments for iron-sulfur clusters
Introducing sacrificial antioxidant residues
Modifying cluster coordination to reduce oxygen reactivity
Thermal stability:
Cluster regeneration:
These approaches could yield LipA variants with enhanced properties for both research applications and potential biotechnological uses.
Despite advances in understanding lipoyl synthase function, several mechanistic aspects remain unresolved:
Outstanding Mechanistic Questions:
Detailed reaction coordinate:
How exactly does the radical SAM chemistry proceed?
What is the precise order of events in the two sulfur insertion steps?
Are there stable intermediates between the first and second sulfur insertions?
Cluster regeneration mechanism:
How exactly does NfuA or other carrier proteins replace the destroyed auxiliary cluster?
What protein-protein interactions facilitate this process?
Is regeneration coupled to catalysis or does it occur independently?
Substrate specificity determinants:
What structural features determine which proteins are substrates for lipoylation?
How does LipA recognize and position the octanoyl moiety for specific C-6/C-8 modification?
Do variations in substrate recognition exist between LipA from different species?
Methodological Approaches to Address These Questions:
Advanced spectroscopic techniques:
Freeze-quench EPR to trap radical intermediates
Mössbauer spectroscopy to characterize iron-sulfur cluster states
ENDOR or ESEEM to examine the environment of radical species
Time-resolved structural studies:
Time-resolved X-ray crystallography using synchrotron radiation
Time-resolved cryo-EM to capture different states of the reaction
Single-molecule FRET to observe conformational changes during catalysis
Novel substrate designs:
Stereospecifically deuterated substrates to track hydrogen atom abstraction
Fluorinated or methylated octanoyl substrates to trap specific intermediates
Photoaffinity labels to capture transient protein-substrate interactions
Computational approaches:
Quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) simulations of the reaction
Free energy calculations for different reaction pathways
Molecular dynamics simulations of enzyme-substrate complexes
Chemical biology approaches:
Activity-based protein profiling to identify new interaction partners
Crosslinking coupled with mass spectrometry to map protein-protein interfaces
In-cell tracking of cluster exchange using genetically encoded fluorescent sensors
Addressing these questions would provide a comprehensive understanding of how LipA functions and could reveal unique aspects of the P. zucineum enzyme compared to other bacterial lipoyl synthases.
Structural studies of P. zucineum LipA would significantly advance our knowledge of radical SAM enzymes:
Contributions to Radical SAM Enzyme Understanding:
Mechanistic insights:
Lipoyl synthases are unique among radical SAM enzymes in sacrificing their auxiliary iron-sulfur cluster
Structural studies could reveal how the enzyme manages this self-destructive chemistry
This would provide insights into how radical SAM enzymes control highly reactive radical species
Auxiliary cluster architecture:
The auxiliary cluster coordination in LipA differs from the canonical radical SAM CX₃CX₂C motif
Structural characterization would reveal how different cysteine motifs create distinct cluster environments
This information could inform understanding of diverse iron-sulfur coordination in other enzymes
Substrate positioning:
How radical SAM enzymes position substrates relative to the deoxyadenosyl radical is a fundamental question
Structures with bound substrate would reveal the geometric constraints necessary for hydrogen atom abstraction
These principles may apply broadly to other radical SAM enzymes
Conformational changes:
Radical SAM enzymes often undergo conformational changes during catalysis
Capturing P. zucineum LipA in different states would provide insights into these dynamics
Understanding these movements is crucial for engineering efforts with radical SAM enzymes
Methodological Approaches:
X-ray crystallography:
Crystallize P. zucineum LipA under anaerobic conditions
Obtain structures with:
Both clusters intact
SAM or SAM analogs bound
Octanoyl substrate analogs
Product analogs
Use microcrystal electron diffraction for challenging crystals
Cryo-electron microscopy:
Single-particle cryo-EM analysis of LipA alone and in complex with:
Substrates and substrate analogs
Carrier proteins like NfuA
Other potential protein partners
Time-resolved cryo-EM to capture different catalytic states
Spectroscopic integration:
Correlate structural data with spectroscopic findings (EPR, Mössbauer)
Combine with computational modeling to understand electronic structures
Use structure-guided spectroscopic experiments to probe specific features
These structural studies would provide a blueprint for understanding how radical SAM enzymes harness the extreme reactivity of radical species for controlled chemistry, with implications extending far beyond lipoic acid biosynthesis to the broader family of these important biological catalysts.