KEGG: ppr:PBPRA2841
STRING: 298386.PBPRA2841
2-dehydro-3-deoxyphosphooctonate aldolase (kdsA) belongs to the family of lyases, specifically aldehyde-lyases, which cleave carbon-carbon bonds . In bacterial systems, this enzyme catalyzes a critical step in the biosynthesis of 3-deoxy-D-manno-octulosonic acid (KDO), an essential component of lipopolysaccharides in Gram-negative bacterial cell walls. In Photobacterium profundum, a psychrohalophilic bacterium isolated from deep-sea environments, kdsA would likely exhibit adaptations allowing it to function optimally under high-pressure and low-temperature conditions, similar to other characterized enzymes from this organism .
The research approach to characterize kdsA function in P. profundum should include:
Comparative sequence analysis with mesophilic homologs
Activity assays under varying pressure conditions (1-280 atm)
Temperature-dependent kinetic analysis (4-25°C optimal range)
Structural analysis to identify pressure-adaptive features
While the specific structure of P. profundum kdsA hasn't been directly characterized in the available literature, insights can be drawn from other P. profundum enzymes. Based on the crystal structure analysis of psychrohalophilic α-carbonic anhydrase from P. profundum, we can anticipate several structural adaptations in kdsA:
Conservation of catalytic core residues essential for function
Potential modifications in surface residues to enhance flexibility
Possible unique ionic interactions in oligomerization interfaces
Structural modifications that permit function under high hydrostatic pressure
For instance, the P. profundum α-carbonic anhydrase revealed a unique chloride ion in its dimer interface not observed in other α-CAs, which may contribute to its pressure adaptation . Similar unique features might be present in P. profundum kdsA to facilitate enzymatic function in the deep-sea environment.
Methodological approaches should include:
Spectrophotometric assays with modified conditions:
Buffer systems containing 2-3% NaCl to mimic marine conditions
Temperature range testing from 4-25°C
High-pressure vessel experiments at 1-280 atm
Coupled enzyme assays measuring product formation rates:
Thiobarbituric acid method for KDO detection
Phosphate release quantification for reaction monitoring
Comparative activity analysis with mesophilic homologs:
Parallel testing of E. coli kdsA under identical conditions
Normalization of specific activity to protein concentration
When designing experiments, researchers should incorporate controls for pressure-dependent effects by using established pressure-sensitive and pressure-insensitive enzymes as benchmarks, similar to approaches used in P. profundum RecD function studies .
Based on general recombinant kdsA expression patterns, the following expression systems can be employed with their respective advantages:
For initial characterization, E. coli systems offer the most efficient approach, while more complex expression systems may be necessary if post-translational modifications affect catalytic activity . When adapting protocols from P. profundum α-carbonic anhydrase studies, consider:
Using pET28a vectors with N-terminal His-tags for simplified purification
Excluding signal peptide regions in construct design
Optimizing induction conditions with IPTG at lower temperatures (15-18°C)
Supplementing growth media with additional Zn²⁺ if required for proper folding
A multi-step purification protocol based on successful approaches with other P. profundum enzymes should include:
| Purification Step | Methodology | Expected Purity | Activity Retention | Critical Parameters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell lysis | Sonication in cold buffer | Initial extract | 100% baseline | Buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT |
| Affinity chromatography | Ni-NTA for His-tagged protein | 85-90% | 85-90% | Imidazole gradient: 20-250 mM |
| Ion exchange | DEAE-Sepharose | 90-95% | 80-85% | NaCl gradient: 0-500 mM |
| Size exclusion | Superdex 200 | >98% | 75-80% | Buffer containing 2-3% NaCl |
Critical considerations specific to P. profundum enzymes include:
Maintaining cold temperatures (4°C) throughout purification
Including salt (2-3% NaCl) in all buffers to mimic marine conditions
Assessing oligomerization state by size exclusion chromatography, as P. profundum enzymes may exhibit heterogeneous oligomeric states (monomers/dimers)
Confirming activity after each purification step using an appropriate activity assay
Based on observations with other P. profundum enzymes like α-carbonic anhydrase, which exists as a heterogeneous mixture of monomers and dimers in solution:
Analytical approaches:
Controlling oligomerization:
Buffer ionic strength manipulation (varying NaCl concentration from 0-500 mM)
Addition of stabilizing agents specific to oligomeric interfaces
Site-directed mutagenesis of predicted interface residues
When analyzing oligomerization, consider that P. profundum enzymes may have unique interface features, such as the chloride ion observed in the dimer interface of P. profundum α-carbonic anhydrase, which could affect stability under different conditions .
Methodological approach for pressure-dependence studies:
Use specialized high-pressure vessels equipped with quick-connect fittings for rapid sampling and repressurization
Conduct enzyme assays at pressure ranges from 1 to 280 atm, focusing on:
Changes in Km and kcat values
Substrate binding efficiency (kcat/Km)
Reaction activation volume determination
Expected trends based on P. profundum's natural habitat:
Likely optimal activity at 200-280 atm pressure
Potential pressure-dependent oligomerization effects
Possible reduced activity at atmospheric pressure
Table: Hypothetical Pressure Effects on P. profundum kdsA Kinetic Parameters
| Pressure (atm) | Km (μM) | kcat (s⁻¹) | kcat/Km (M⁻¹s⁻¹) | Temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 120 ± 15 | 8.5 ± 0.7 | 7.1 × 10⁴ | 15 |
| 100 | 95 ± 10 | 12.3 ± 1.1 | 1.3 × 10⁵ | 15 |
| 200 | 85 ± 8 | 15.6 ± 1.3 | 1.8 × 10⁵ | 15 |
| 280 | 78 ± 7 | 18.2 ± 1.5 | 2.3 × 10⁵ | 15 |
| 350 | 90 ± 9 | 16.5 ± 1.4 | 1.8 × 10⁵ | 15 |
Based on structural studies of other pressure-adapted proteins, investigate:
Amino acid composition analysis:
Reduced number of hydrophobic residues in the protein core
Increased presence of charged residues on the protein surface
Modified packing density in the protein interior
Molecular dynamics simulations:
Conformational flexibility analysis under different pressure conditions
Calculation of void volumes within the protein structure
Water molecule penetration patterns under pressure
Comparative structural analysis:
Robust experimental design should include:
Positive controls:
Negative controls:
Mesophilic kdsA homologs from E. coli or other non-pressure adapted bacteria
Pressure-insensitive enzymes like alkaline phosphatase
Complementation studies:
Expression of P. profundum kdsA in pressure-sensitive E. coli strains
Growth assays under various pressure conditions
Analysis of lipopolysaccharide composition in complemented strains
Control experiments should follow methodologies established in P. profundum RecD studies, which demonstrated restoration of high-pressure growth phenotypes through complementation .
Based on successful crystallization of other P. profundum enzymes:
Initial screening approach:
Vapor diffusion (sitting drop method) with commercial screening kits
Temperature range testing (4°C, 10°C, and 15°C)
Inclusion of salt conditions mimicking marine environment (2-3% NaCl)
Optimization strategies:
Fine-tuning precipitant concentration and pH
Addition of additives like divalent metal ions (Zn²⁺, Mg²⁺)
Seeding techniques for improving crystal quality
Alternative approaches if traditional methods fail:
Lipidic cubic phase crystallization for membrane-associated variants
In situ high-pressure crystallization to capture native conformations
Surface entropy reduction through site-directed mutagenesis
When examining crystal packing and interfaces, pay particular attention to unique features like the chloride ion observed in P. profundum α-carbonic anhydrase dimer interface, which may play functional roles specific to pressure adaptation .
Computational approaches should include:
Simulation parameters:
All-atom molecular dynamics under varying pressure conditions (1-300 atm)
Explicit solvent model with appropriate salt concentration
Minimum simulation time of 100-500 ns for equilibration
Analysis metrics:
Root mean square deviation (RMSD) and fluctuation (RMSF)
Solvent accessible surface area changes
Void volume calculations using programs like POVME or CAVER
Salt bridge and hydrogen bond network dynamics
Key predictions:
Identification of pressure-sensitive regions within the protein structure
Calculation of compressibility factors
Prediction of pressure-dependent conformational changes
Assessment of water penetration into protein core
As demonstrated in P. profundum α-carbonic anhydrase studies, molecular dynamics can reveal important features like ion occupancy in protein interfaces that contribute to pressure adaptation .
Complementary biophysical approaches include:
High-pressure spectroscopy:
Circular dichroism with high-pressure cells to monitor secondary structure
Fluorescence spectroscopy to assess tertiary structure changes
FTIR spectroscopy for hydrogen bonding network analysis
Advanced techniques:
High-pressure NMR for residue-specific conformational changes
Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) to monitor oligomerization state
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify flexible regions
Real-time kinetic measurements:
Stopped-flow apparatus modified for high-pressure conditions
Rapid-mixing experiments to capture transient states
Temperature-jump combined with pressure perturbation
Data interpretation should focus on comparing conformational stability at deep-sea relevant pressures (200-280 atm) versus ambient conditions, with careful consideration of salt effects that might influence pressure adaptation mechanisms.
Methodological approach to data analysis:
Mathematical models for non-linear pressure effects:
Fitting data to polynomial functions to identify pressure optimum
Calculation of activation volume (ΔV‡) from pressure-dependent rate constants
Thermodynamic analysis using transition state theory
Biological interpretation strategies:
Correlation with natural habitat conditions (P. profundum SS9 isolated from 2.5 km depth)
Comparison with other deep-sea enzymes showing similar adaptations
Structure-function relationship analysis based on identified pressure-sensitive regions
Statistical considerations:
Minimum triplicate measurements at each pressure point
Appropriate error analysis and propagation through derived parameters
Control experiments at standardized conditions for cross-comparison
Understanding pressure adaptation in P. profundum kdsA has implications for:
Fundamental science:
Evolutionary mechanisms of enzyme adaptation to extreme environments
Structure-function relationships under non-standard conditions
Molecular basis of pressure effects on protein dynamics
Biotechnological applications:
Engineering pressure-stable enzymes for industrial biocatalysis
Development of biosensors functional in high-pressure environments
Designing biocatalysts with enhanced stability for various applications
Experimental approaches:
Comparative studies between psychrohalophilic and mesophilic homologs
Site-directed mutagenesis to identify key residues conferring pressure adaptation
Domain swapping experiments to transfer pressure tolerance to other enzymes
Systematic troubleshooting approach:
Source verification:
Confirm sequence identity between constructs used in different expression systems
Verify absence of mutations introduced during cloning
Check for expression vector effects on protein production
Post-translational modification analysis:
Mass spectrometry to identify modifications present in different expression systems
Phosphorylation, glycosylation, or other modification site mapping
Correlation of modifications with activity differences
Experimental standardization:
Normalize enzyme activity to active site concentration rather than total protein
Standardize assay conditions (temperature, pH, pressure, salt concentration)
Develop a consensus protocol incorporating controls for system-specific effects
When comparing results across systems, consider that different expression hosts may introduce system-specific modifications that affect enzyme function, as noted in the varying posttranslational modifications observed between expression systems for recombinant proteins .