Recombinant Photobacterium profundum ATP synthase subunit alpha 2 (atpA2), partial, refers to a synthetically produced fragment of the alpha subunit of ATP synthase from the deep-sea bacterium Photobacterium profundum . ATP synthase is an enzyme complex crucial for generating adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the primary energy currency of cells . In P. profundum, which thrives under high hydrostatic pressure (HHP), ATP synthesis mechanisms are adapted to these extreme conditions . The atpA2 subunit is part of the F1 domain of ATP synthase, which is a water-soluble complex consisting of α3β3γδε subunits .
Photobacterium profundum is a piezophilic (pressure-loving) bacterium isolated from deep-sea environments . These bacteria have adapted to the high hydrostatic pressures of deep-sea environments, exhibiting unique physiological and biochemical adaptations . The study of P. profundum provides insights into how life can thrive under extreme conditions, particularly regarding energy production and metabolic processes .
ATP synthase in P. profundum is sensitive to hydrostatic pressure, with moderate pressure increasing its activity and higher pressure leading to its disassembly and inactivation . P. profundum possesses two sets of ATP synthase operons, ATPase-I and ATPase-II, which are differentially regulated under varying pressure and nutrient conditions .
The genes responsible for F-ATPase synthesis typically form a conserved operon of atpBEFHAGDC, encoding subunits acbδαγβε, respectively . Some bacteria also have a gene, atpI, upstream of atpB that functions as a chaperone to mediate the assembly of the c-ring, which is indispensable for the synthesis of Na+F-ATPase .
P. profundum uses two sets of ATPases (ATPase-I and ATPase-II) depending on the growth conditions. In MB2216 medium, ATPase-I is dominant, while ATPase-II is more abundant in minimal glucose (MG) medium, especially under high pressure . Disrupting ATPase-I induces the expression of ATPase-II, indicating functional redundancy between the two systems .
The atpA2 subunit is a component of the F1 domain, which is crucial for ATP synthesis . The F1 domain, consisting of α3β3γδε subunits, uses the proton gradient generated by the electron transport chain to synthesize ATP . The alpha subunits, along with the beta subunits, form the catalytic core of the F1 domain, where ATP synthesis occurs .
Research on P. profundum has revealed that the expression and activity of ATP synthase are significantly influenced by environmental conditions, particularly pressure and nutrient availability .
Moderate hydrostatic pressure can increase ATPase activity, while high hydrostatic pressure disassembles the complex, leading to inactivation . Studies have shown that the rotational rate of ATPases decreases at elevated pressures, potentially due to a pressure-sensitive ATP docking process .
P. profundum exhibits a more pronounced piezophilic phenotype when grown in minimal medium (MG) compared to complex medium (MB2216) . Intracellular ATP levels vary with pressure, showing opposite trends in different culture media. In MB2216, ATP levels are higher at 28 MPa than at 0.1 MPa, whereas in MG medium, ATP levels are lower at high pressure .
KEGG: ppr:PBPRB0134
STRING: 298386.PBPRB0134
Photobacterium profundum ATP synthase is a membrane-bound enzyme complex found in the deep-sea bacterium Photobacterium profundum (strain SS9), which is adapted to high-pressure environments. Similar to other bacterial ATP synthases, it catalyzes the synthesis of ATP from ADP and inorganic phosphate using energy from transmembrane proton motive force . The alpha subunit (atpA2) is one of the major components of the F1 catalytic portion of the ATP synthase complex and contains nucleotide binding sites. While the gamma chain (ATPG2) plays a crucial role in the rotary mechanism of the enzyme , the alpha subunit forms part of the stationary hexameric ring (α3β3) that houses the catalytic sites at the interface between alpha and beta subunits . The partial recombinant version of this protein is specifically used for investigating structure-function relationships in pressure-adapted ATP synthases.
The ATP synthase from Photobacterium profundum shares the core architectural features seen in other bacterial ATP synthases, with a simpler subunit composition compared to mitochondrial counterparts. The bacterial F1 region typically consists of subunits α3β3γδε, while the FO region usually comprises subunits ab2c9-15 . Specifically for Photobacterium profundum:
| Feature | P. profundum ATP synthase | Other Bacterial ATP synthases (e.g., Bacillus PS3) | Mitochondrial ATP synthase |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1 subunit composition | α3β3γδε | α3β3γδε | α3β3γδε plus additional subunits |
| FO subunit composition | ab2c10-12 (estimated) | ab2c10 (in Bacillus PS3) | Multiple additional subunits |
| Pressure adaptation | Contains specific amino acid substitutions for pressure tolerance | Standard configuration for ambient pressure | Optimized for eukaryotic cellular environments |
Unlike thermophilic ATP synthases (such as from Bacillus PS3) that show adaptation to high temperatures through increased ionic interactions , P. profundum ATP synthase likely contains adaptations to high pressure environments, though these specific structural adaptations remain to be fully characterized through detailed comparison studies.
Recombinant Photobacterium profundum ATP synthase subunits are typically expressed using E. coli expression systems, similar to what is used for the gamma chain (ATPG2) . The methodology involves:
Cloning the gene encoding the desired subunit (e.g., atpA2) into an appropriate expression vector
Transformation into a suitable E. coli strain optimized for protein expression
Induction of protein expression under controlled conditions
Purification using affinity chromatography via attached tags
Most commonly, the proteins are produced with affinity tags such as N-terminal polyhistidine (His) tags or C-terminal tags like Myc to facilitate purification . For the alpha subunit specifically, expression parameters similar to those established for the gamma subunit would be applied, with optimization for the particular characteristics of the alpha subunit protein.
Conducting functional studies with the recombinant P. profundum ATP synthase alpha subunit requires careful consideration of several critical factors:
Protein Solubility and Stability Management:
Buffer optimization is essential, with Tris/PBS-based buffers (pH 8.0) typically providing good results
Adding 5-50% glycerol improves stability during storage and handling
For lyophilized preparations, inclusion of 6% trehalose helps maintain protein structure during freeze-drying and reconstitution
Reconstitution Parameters for Activity Preservation:
Pressure Adaptation Considerations:
Studies should account for the pressure adaptation of P. profundum
Experimental designs may need to include high-pressure chambers to observe native functionality
Comparison with mesophilic bacterial ATP synthases should be conducted under both standard and high-pressure conditions
Assembly with Other Subunits:
For studies requiring complete F1 assembly, all five subunits (α, β, γ, δ, and ε) must be expressed and assembled
Specific molar ratios of subunits should be maintained (3:3:1:1:1 for α:β:γ:δ:ε)
The correct assembly can be verified through size-exclusion chromatography and negative-stain electron microscopy
Investigating rotational states and catalytic mechanisms of P. profundum ATP synthase requires sophisticated experimental approaches:
Cryo-EM Analysis Protocol:
Expression of complete ATP synthase complex or reconstitution from individual subunits including the recombinant alpha subunit
Purification through affinity chromatography followed by size exclusion chromatography
Sample preparation for cryo-EM with optimization of ice thickness and particle distribution
Data collection with motion correction and CTF estimation
Particle picking and classification to identify different rotational states
Focused refinement of specific regions (F1 and FO) to improve resolution
Rotational State Analysis:
The ATP synthase typically exhibits three main rotational states due to the symmetry mismatch between the 120° steps of the F1 motor and the smaller steps of the FO motor
Comparison of the positions of c-subunits in different rotational states can reveal the step sizes (typically 3, 4, and 3 c-subunits per 120° F1 rotation)
The alpha subunit's conformational changes during these rotational states provide insight into the catalytic mechanism
Site-Directed Mutagenesis Studies:
Targeted mutations in key residues of the alpha subunit can identify essential amino acids for catalysis
Comparison of equivalent mutations in mesophilic ATP synthases can highlight pressure-specific adaptations
Activity assays under various pressure conditions can correlate structural features with functional adaptations
Studying pressure effects on P. profundum ATP synthase alpha subunit requires specialized methodologies:
High-Pressure Biophysical Techniques:
High-pressure X-ray crystallography to determine structural changes under pressure
High-pressure NMR spectroscopy to analyze dynamic changes in protein conformation
High-pressure circular dichroism to monitor secondary structure stability
Pressure perturbation calorimetry to measure volumetric properties and hydration changes
Functional Assays Under Pressure:
High-pressure stopped-flow spectroscopy to measure kinetic parameters
Enzyme activity assays in pressure chambers to determine pressure optima and ranges
Comparison of ATP synthesis/hydrolysis rates at different pressures
Measurement of proton translocation efficiency under pressure conditions
Comparative Analysis Framework:
| Parameter | Atmospheric Pressure | Moderate Pressure (50 MPa) | High Pressure (100 MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATP Synthesis Rate | Baseline measurement | Expected increase for P. profundum | Optimal activity expected |
| Structural Stability | Baseline stability | Enhanced stability for pressure-adapted features | Maintained functionality |
| Conformational Flexibility | Standard measurement | Potentially reduced | Optimized for function |
| Subunit Interaction Strength | Standard measurement | Potentially enhanced | Optimized for function |
Molecular Dynamics Simulations:
Simulation of alpha subunit behavior under different pressure conditions
Analysis of water molecule organization around the protein at high pressure
Identification of pressure-sensing regions within the protein structure
Prediction of pressure-induced conformational changes that can be verified experimentally
Designing comparative experiments between P. profundum ATP synthase alpha subunit and non-piezophilic homologs requires:
Homolog Selection Strategy:
Choose homologs from phylogenetically related bacteria living at different depths/pressures
Include both mesophilic (e.g., E. coli) and other extremophile (thermophilic, psychrophilic) homologs
Ensure sequence alignment and homology modeling to identify key structural differences
Standardized Expression and Purification Protocol:
Systematic Comparative Assays:
Thermal stability assays (differential scanning fluorimetry) at various pressures
Nucleotide binding affinity measurements under pressure gradients
Structural analysis through circular dichroism at different pressures
Limited proteolysis experiments to identify domains with different pressure sensitivities
Data Analysis Framework:
| Analysis Parameter | Measurement Technique | Expected Differences |
|---|---|---|
| Pressure stability | Half-life at elevated pressure | Longer for P. profundum |
| Conformational changes | Intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy | Smaller changes for P. profundum at high pressure |
| Activity profile vs. pressure | ATP synthesis assay | Broader optimum for P. profundum |
| Volume change upon nucleotide binding | Pressure perturbation calorimetry | Smaller for P. profundum |
Site-directed mutagenesis studies of P. profundum ATP synthase alpha subunit should consider:
Target Residue Identification Strategy:
Analyze sequence alignments with non-piezophilic homologs to identify unique residues
Focus on ionizable residues that may contribute to pressure adaptation
Target residues in nucleotide binding domains and subunit interfaces
Examine regions with potential flexibility differences under pressure
Mutation Design Principles:
Create conservative mutations (similar physicochemical properties) first
Design reverse mutations (changing P. profundum-specific residues to those found in mesophilic homologs)
Create charge-altering mutations to test electrostatic interaction hypotheses
Design volume-changing mutations to test packing hypotheses for pressure adaptation
Experimental Validation Hierarchy:
Expression level and solubility screening
Structural integrity verification through circular dichroism
Thermal and pressure stability profiling
Nucleotide binding affinity determination
Assembly capacity with other ATP synthase subunits
Functional testing through ATP synthesis/hydrolysis assays under pressure
Integrative Data Analysis Approach:
Correlation of structural changes with functional outcomes
Multi-parameter analysis to identify synergistic effects of mutations
Development of a molecular model for pressure adaptation mechanisms
Statistical analysis to determine significance of observed differences
Reconstituting functional ATP synthase complexes with recombinant P. profundum alpha subunit requires:
Component Preparation Protocol:
Reconstitution Strategy:
Sequential addition of subunits in defined order to promote correct assembly
Incubation under controlled conditions (temperature, pH, ionic strength)
Verification of assembly through size-exclusion chromatography
Functional verification through ATP synthesis/hydrolysis assays
Structural Analysis Methods:
Sample Preparation for Different Structural Methods:
| Method | Sample Requirements | Special Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Cryo-EM | 2-5 mg/ml protein, minimal detergent | Grid optimization, preventing preferential orientation |
| X-ray Crystallography | 10-20 mg/ml protein, highly pure | Crystallization condition screening, pressure chambers |
| Solution NMR | Isotopically labeled proteins | Size limitations, subunit interaction focus |
| Solid-state NMR | Reconstituted in lipid environment | Membrane mimetic optimization |
| SAXS/SANS | 1-5 mg/ml protein | Contrast matching for subunit localization |
Researchers commonly encounter several challenges when working with recombinant P. profundum ATP synthase subunits:
Expression Yield Optimization:
Challenge: Low expression levels due to codon bias in E. coli
Solution: Use codon-optimized gene sequences and specialized E. coli strains with rare codons (e.g., Rosetta)
Challenge: Protein misfolding due to rapid expression
Solution: Lower induction temperature (16-20°C) and reduce inducer concentration
Solubility Enhancement Strategies:
Purification Troubleshooting:
Challenge: Low affinity to Ni-NTA resin despite His-tag
Solution: Ensure tag is accessible, adjust imidazole concentration in binding buffer, try different metal ions
Challenge: Co-purification of contaminants
Solution: Increase washing stringency, add secondary purification steps (ion exchange, size exclusion)
Stability During Storage:
When faced with discrepancies between structural data and functional assays, researchers should:
Systematic Discrepancy Analysis:
Evaluate whether the recombinant protein truly represents the native state
Consider if the experimental conditions (especially pressure) match physiological conditions
Assess whether tags or modifications affect function or structure
Determine if the protein is in the expected rotational/conformational state for observed function
Structure-Function Correlation Framework:
Map functional data onto structural models to identify correlations and discrepancies
Consider that different rotational states may explain functional variances
Analyze whether observed inconsistencies relate to known flexible regions
Determine if subunit interactions in reconstituted systems match native complexes
Methodological Validation Approach:
Verify structural data through orthogonal structural methods
Confirm functional data using multiple assay types and conditions
Test function under conditions that match structural studies (buffer, temperature, pressure)
Consider time-resolved approaches to capture dynamic states missed in static structural studies
Biological Context Interpretation:
Compare with data from related organisms to distinguish organism-specific features
Consider evolutionary context and pressure adaptation mechanisms
Assess whether discrepancies might represent actual regulatory mechanisms
Evaluate if the differences reveal novel aspects of ATP synthase function under pressure
Studying proton translocation in P. profundum ATP synthase requires specialized techniques:
High-Resolution Structural Analysis:
Cryo-EM with focused refinement of the membrane region to visualize the proton channel
X-ray crystallography of the FO portion (challenging but potentially high-reward)
Molecular dynamics simulations to model proton movement through identified channels
Hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify solvent-accessible regions
Functional Proton Translocation Assays:
pH-sensitive fluorescent probe assays in reconstituted liposomes
Patch-clamp electrophysiology of reconstituted enzyme in artificial membranes
Measurement of proton translocation under various pressure conditions
Analysis of the effects of pH and membrane potential (ΔΨ) on activity, similar to studies with Bacillus PS3
Site-Directed Mutagenesis Strategy:
Targeted mutations of putative proton-carrying residues
Creation of chimeric proteins with subunits from non-piezophilic bacteria
Introduction of reporter groups at key positions in the proton pathway
Correlation of mutation effects with structural models
Data Integration Framework:
| Analysis Approach | Data Types Combined | Expected Insights |
|---|---|---|
| Structure-Function Mapping | Cryo-EM + mutagenesis results | Identification of essential residues in proton path |
| Pressure-Response Profile | Activity assays + H/D exchange | Pressure effects on channel accessibility |
| Comparative Pathway Analysis | P. profundum data vs. mesophilic bacteria | Pressure-specific adaptations in proton translocation |
| Integrative Modeling | All experimental data + MD simulations | Complete model of proton movement through the enzyme |
The study of P. profundum ATP synthase offers valuable insights for enzyme engineering:
Pressure Adaptation Principles:
Identification of specific amino acid substitutions that confer pressure resistance
Understanding of protein packing principles that maintain function under pressure
Elucidation of flexibility/rigidity balance that optimizes activity at high pressure
Discovery of interaction networks that stabilize protein complexes under pressure
Biomimetic Design Strategy:
Transfer of identified pressure-resistant motifs to industrial enzymes
Creation of chimeric proteins incorporating P. profundum ATP synthase domains
Development of computational algorithms to predict pressure-stabilizing mutations
Implementation of machine learning approaches to identify non-obvious pressure adaptation patterns
Potential Biotechnological Applications:
Design of pressure-resistant biocatalysts for high-pressure industrial processes
Development of enzymes for deep-sea bioremediation
Creation of pressure-stable proteins for high-pressure food processing
Engineering of pressure-resistant biomolecular materials
Research-to-Application Roadmap:
| Research Phase | Key Outcomes | Application Potential |
|---|---|---|
| Fundamental Structure-Function Analysis | Identification of pressure adaptation motifs | Design principles for protein engineering |
| Comparative Studies with Homologs | Ranking of adaptation effectiveness | Selection of best motifs for transfer |
| Directed Evolution Under Pressure | Novel pressure-resistant variants | Optimization for specific applications |
| Industrial Enzyme Modification | Pressure-resistant industrial enzymes | Enhanced bioprocessing under pressure |
Evolutionary studies of ATP synthase pressure adaptation should consider:
Phylogenetic Analysis Framework:
Comprehensive sequence collection from organisms across pressure gradients
Construction of phylogenetic trees focusing on ATP synthase subunits
Identification of convergent evolution patterns in different pressure-adapted lineages
Correlation of sequence changes with habitat depth/pressure
Comparative Genomics Approach:
Analysis of ATP synthase operon organization in piezophiles versus mesophiles
Identification of regulatory elements that may control expression under pressure
Assessment of horizontal gene transfer events that may have contributed to pressure adaptation
Examination of genomic context for ATP synthase genes in pressure-adapted species
Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction:
Computational resurrection of ancestral ATP synthase sequences
Laboratory expression and characterization of ancestral proteins
Experimental testing of evolutionary trajectories through intermediate constructs
Identification of key mutations that enabled pressure adaptation
Integration with Structural Biology:
Mapping of evolutionarily significant residues onto high-resolution structures
Correlation of evolutionary rate with structural features
Analysis of co-evolution patterns between interacting subunits
Molecular dynamics simulations of ancestral and modern proteins under pressure
Developing an integrative model requires combining multiple approaches: