GMP synthase (EC 6.3.5.2) catalyzes the amination of xanthosine 5′-monophosphate (XMP) to guanosine 5′-monophosphate (GMP) using glutamine as an amino donor. This two-step reaction involves:
Glutamine hydrolysis by the glutamine amidotransferase (GATase) domain, generating ammonia.
ATP-driven amination of XMP via the ATP pyrophosphatase (ATPPase) domain, forming GMP .
In P. profundum, the enzyme’s role is inferred from its genomic presence and structural homology to bacterial GMP synthases. The "partial" designation suggests truncation or modification of the full-length sequence during recombinant production.
The reaction proceeds in three stages:
ATP Adenylation: ATP + XMP → adenyl-XMP (catalyzed by ATPPPase domain).
Glutamine Hydrolysis: Glutamine → glutamate + ammonia (GATase domain).
Key kinetic parameters (inferred from homologs):
guaA in P. profundum is part of a high-GC-content genome (38.7–50.9% GC), characteristic of environmental versatility .
Genomic libraries of P. profundum have been used to study pressure-responsive genes (e.g., recD) , though guaA’s role in high-pressure adaptation remains unexplored.
Recombinant GMP synthases are often expressed in heterologous systems (e.g., E. coli) for structural/functional studies.
Partial truncation may aim to study domain-specific interactions or improve solubility.
Biotechnological: Enzyme engineering for nucleotide production or metabolic pathway optimization.
Therapeutic: Targeting GMP synthase in pathogens (e.g., Cryptococcus neoformans) to disrupt guanine biosynthesis .
Pressure-Responsive Regulation: P. profundum’s guaA may be upregulated under high-pressure conditions, akin to lateral flagella genes .
Structural Data: No cryo-EM or crystallographic data exist for P. profundum GMP synthase, unlike Plasmodium or Thermus homologs .
Functional Characterization: Kinetic parameters and substrate specificity for the recombinant variant remain unreported.
Catalyzes the synthesis of GMP from XMP.
KEGG: ppr:PBPRA0781
STRING: 298386.PBPRA0781
GMP synthase [glutamine-hydrolyzing] (guaA, EC 6.3.5.2) from Photobacterium profundum SS9 is a bifunctional enzyme that catalyzes the final step in de novo GMP biosynthesis. This enzyme converts XMP (xanthosine monophosphate) to GMP using glutamine as an amide donor. In P. profundum, this protein is encoded by the guaA gene (PBPRA0781) and consists of 527 amino acids . The protein plays a critical role in purine nucleotide biosynthesis, which is essential for DNA and RNA synthesis, as well as for various signaling pathways.
The enzyme is bifunctional, containing both GMP synthase and glutamine amidotransferase activities, allowing it to catalyze the ATP-dependent amidation of XMP to GMP. This bifunctionality is reflected in its structural organization, with distinct domains responsible for each activity. The protein's structure has been computationally modeled with high confidence (pLDDT global score of 90.9), suggesting a well-ordered tertiary structure .
P. profundum SS9 is a piezophilic (pressure-loving) bacterium that grows optimally at 28 MPa (approximately 280 atmospheres) and 15°C . Laboratory culture of this organism typically employs marine broth (28 g/liter 2216 medium) supplemented with 20 mM glucose and 100 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) . For anaerobic growth conditions, cultures are often grown in sealed containers with minimal headspace to maintain pressure uniformity.
Standard laboratory protocols include:
Inoculation from -80°C freezer stocks into marine broth
Growth at 15-17°C until reaching appropriate optical density
Transfer to pressure vessels for high-pressure growth when studying pressure-responsive phenotypes
Importantly, while P. profundum grows optimally at high pressure, it can also grow at atmospheric pressure, facilitating genetic manipulation and routine laboratory culture. This adaptability makes it an excellent model organism for studying piezophily .
The guaA gene in P. profundum SS9 is located on chromosome 1 at position 864532..866115 in the genome, encoding a protein of 527 amino acids . The gene is flanked by:
Upstream: An inositol-5-monophosphate dehydrogenase gene (position 862936..864399)
Downstream: A putative p-aminobenzoyl-glutamate transporter gene (position 866566..868125)
This genomic organization suggests potential co-regulation or functional relationships between guaA and these neighboring genes. The guaA gene is specifically identified as PBPRA0781 in the genome annotation, with a GC content of approximately 44.51%, which is within the typical range for P. profundum genes .
While the search results don't specifically address expression systems for P. profundum guaA, standard recombinant protein expression approaches can be adapted. Based on methodologies used with other P. profundum proteins, the following systems would likely be suitable:
E. coli-based expression systems:
BL21(DE3) strains for T7-based expression
Arctic Express strains for cold-adapted expression (relevant given P. profundum's psychrophilic nature)
Rosetta strains to address codon usage differences between E. coli and P. profundum
Cold-adapted expression protocols:
Induction at lower temperatures (15-20°C)
Extended expression periods (24-48 hours)
Use of mild inducers (0.1-0.5 mM IPTG)
Specialized conditions:
Inclusion of osmolytes or pressure-mimicking conditions
Marine-based media supplements
These approaches take into account P. profundum's adaptation to cold, high-pressure environments while utilizing standard laboratory expression hosts.
Proteomic studies have shown that P. profundum differentially expresses numerous proteins in response to varying hydrostatic pressure conditions. While the search results don't specifically mention pressure effects on GMP synthase, related metabolic pathways show clear pressure-dependent regulation patterns. Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathway proteins are typically up-regulated at high pressure (28 MPa), while oxidative phosphorylation pathway components tend to be up-regulated at atmospheric pressure .
Given that GMP synthase participates in nucleotide metabolism, which interfaces with central carbon metabolism, its expression and activity may similarly be pressure-responsive. Researchers investigating pressure effects specifically on GMP synthase should consider:
Comparative expression analysis at different pressures (0.1 MPa vs. 28 MPa)
Enzyme kinetics studies under varying pressure conditions
Structural stability assessments at different pressures
Potential adaptation of the active site for function under high pressure
The protein's structure, modeled with high confidence (pLDDT global score: 90.9) , might contain features that facilitate function under pressure, though specific pressure-adapted structural elements would require experimental verification.
Based on general principles for purifying GMP synthase and the characteristics of proteins from extremophiles like P. profundum, the following purification strategy would be recommended:
| Step | Method | Buffer Composition | Parameters | Expected Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cell lysis | 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, protease inhibitors | Sonication or French press | Complete cell disruption |
| 2 | Affinity chromatography | Above buffer + 10-250 mM imidazole gradient | His-tagged protein, Ni-NTA column | 80-90% purity |
| 3 | Ion exchange | 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 50-500 mM NaCl gradient, 5% glycerol, 1 mM DTT | Q-Sepharose or equivalent | >95% purity |
| 4 | Size exclusion | 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 1 mM DTT | Superdex 200 or equivalent | >98% purity, removal of aggregates |
This purification scheme incorporates:
Cold temperature maintenance throughout (4-8°C)
Increased salt concentration to maintain stability of halophilic proteins
Use of glycerol as a stabilizing agent
DTT to maintain reduced state of cysteine residues
Researchers should verify final purity by SDS-PAGE and confirm activity using appropriate enzyme assays.
The enzymatic activity of GMP synthase can be measured through several complementary approaches:
Spectrophotometric assay: Monitoring the decrease in absorbance at 290 nm, corresponding to the conversion of XMP to GMP. This can be performed in a reaction buffer containing:
50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)
100 mM KCl
5 mM MgCl₂
1 mM ATP
1 mM glutamine
0.1 mM XMP
1 mM DTT
HPLC-based assay: Quantifying the production of GMP directly by separating reaction products on a C18 column using appropriate mobile phases and UV detection at 252 nm.
Coupled enzyme assay: Using auxiliary enzymes to couple GMP production to NADH oxidation, which can be monitored spectrophotometrically at 340 nm.
Important considerations specific to P. profundum GMP synthase include:
Temperature effects (assays at 15°C vs. standard temperatures)
Pressure effects (specialized high-pressure enzyme assay chambers may be required)
Salt concentration optimization (given the marine origin of the organism)
P. profundum GMP synthase shares structural similarities with homologs from other bacteria, but may possess unique adaptations related to high-pressure environments. The AlphaFold computational model (AF-Q6LU31-F1) released in 2021 and modified in 2022 shows a high-confidence prediction of the protein's structure (global pLDDT score of 90.9) .
Comparative analyses should focus on:
While specific experimental data comparing these features is not provided in the search results, researchers typically observe these patterns when comparing enzymes from piezophilic organisms to mesophilic counterparts. Advanced structural analyses using X-ray crystallography, hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry, or molecular dynamics simulations would be necessary to confirm these hypothesized differences.
Based on established methods for P. profundum genetic manipulation described in the search results, the following techniques would be effective for studying guaA function:
Conjugal delivery of plasmids: Bi-parental mating between E. coli (containing appropriate vectors) and P. profundum strains has been successfully used for genetic transfer . This approach allows for introduction of plasmids carrying wild-type or modified guaA genes.
Transposon mutagenesis: Large-scale transposon mutagenesis has been employed for P. profundum, including with Tn5-B30 . This approach could generate guaA mutants or mutants in related pathways.
Gene disruption methods: Targeted gene disruption can be accomplished using internal gene fragments cloned into suicide vectors (like pMUT100) that integrate into the chromosome via single-crossover events . For guaA, primers could be designed to amplify internal fragments for such disruption.
Plasmid rescue techniques: For identifying and characterizing genetic regions, plasmid rescue approaches have been successfully applied, where genomic DNA is digested, circularized, and transformed into E. coli .
The methodology typically involves:
Culture incubation at 15-17°C
Use of marine broth supplemented with appropriate antibiotics
Mating procedures on membrane filters
Selection on appropriate media
Verification of genetic modifications by PCR and sequencing
These approaches could be applied to study guaA function through complementation of mutants, overexpression studies, or expression of modified versions of the gene.
While the search results don't directly address biotechnological applications of P. profundum GMP synthase, several potential applications can be inferred based on its pressure-adapted properties:
Biocatalysis under non-conventional conditions:
High-pressure enzymatic processes (100-300 MPa)
Low-temperature bioprocessing (5-15°C)
Combined pressure-temperature bioprocessing
Structural biology insights:
Template for engineering pressure-stable enzymes
Model for understanding protein adaptation to extreme conditions
Development of pressure-resistant protein scaffolds
Nucleotide synthesis applications:
Production of modified nucleotides under pressure conditions
Pressure-enhanced selectivity for certain substrates
Cold-adapted nucleotide synthesis processes
Pharmaceutical and research reagent applications:
Development of pressure-stable enzyme formulations
Cold-active enzyme reagents for molecular biology
Novel substrate specificities for nucleotide analog synthesis
These applications would require thorough characterization of the enzyme's kinetic parameters under various pressure conditions, as well as engineering efforts to optimize expression, stability, and catalytic properties for specific biotechnological purposes.
To investigate pressure-responsive regulation of guaA expression in P. profundum, researchers could employ several complementary approaches:
Transcriptomic analysis:
RNA-Seq comparing expression at different pressures (0.1 MPa vs. 28 MPa)
qRT-PCR validation of guaA expression changes
Transcription start site mapping using 5' RACE
Promoter analysis:
Identification of regulatory elements in the guaA promoter region
Reporter gene assays using promoter-reporter fusions
DNA-protein interaction studies (EMSA, ChIP-seq) to identify trans-acting factors
Proteomic approaches:
Label-free quantitation mass spectrometry (as described in search result 3)
Targeted proteomics focusing on GMP synthase and related proteins
Protein stability and turnover studies under different pressure conditions
Genetic approaches:
Construction of promoter deletion/mutation series
Identification of regulatory mutants with altered pressure response
Transposon mutagenesis screening for regulators of guaA expression
| Analysis Level | Method | Pressure Conditions | Expected Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcriptional | RNA-Seq | 0.1, 15, 28 MPa | Pressure-dependent expression profile |
| Promoter activity | GFP reporter fusion | 0.1, 15, 28 MPa | Identification of regulatory elements |
| Protein abundance | LC-MS/MS | 0.1, 15, 28 MPa | Quantitative protein expression changes |
| Protein-DNA interaction | ChIP-seq | 0.1, 28 MPa | Identification of transcription factors |
| Genetic regulation | Transposon library screening | 0.1, 28 MPa | Discovery of regulatory genes |
The culture methodology would follow established protocols for P. profundum growth at different pressures, as described in search result 3, using pressure vessels capable of maintaining controlled hydrostatic pressure conditions .
Recombinant expression of proteins from extremophiles like P. profundum often presents unique challenges. For guaA specifically, researchers might encounter:
Protein solubility issues:
Problem: Formation of inclusion bodies due to improper folding in mesophilic expression hosts
Solution: Lower induction temperature (15-18°C), reduce inducer concentration, use solubility-enhancing fusion tags (SUMO, MBP), or add osmolytes to the growth medium
Low expression levels:
Problem: Codon usage differences between P. profundum and expression host
Solution: Use codon-optimized synthetic gene, employ Rosetta strains containing rare tRNAs, or optimize ribosome binding sites
Loss of activity during purification:
Problem: Protein destabilization during pressure transition
Solution: Include stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific ions), maintain cold temperatures throughout purification, consider rapid purification protocols
Difficulty in reproducing native conditions:
Problem: Standard lab conditions don't reflect the high-pressure, low-temperature native environment
Solution: Specialized high-pressure expression systems or post-expression pressure treatment of purified protein
Differentiating between pressure effects on protein structure versus catalytic mechanism requires a multi-faceted experimental approach:
Structural analysis under pressure:
High-pressure X-ray crystallography
High-pressure NMR spectroscopy
High-pressure circular dichroism
Molecular dynamics simulations under varying pressure conditions
Catalytic mechanism investigation:
Pre-steady-state kinetics under varying pressures
Isotope effect studies at different pressures
Pressure dependence of individual catalytic steps
Site-directed mutagenesis of catalytic residues followed by pressure-dependent activity assays
Hybrid approaches:
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry at varying pressures
Trapping catalytic intermediates under pressure
Temperature-pressure phase diagrams of activity versus structural stability
By comparing the pressure dependence of structural parameters (measured by spectroscopic methods) with the pressure dependence of catalytic parameters (measured by kinetic methods), researchers can distinguish between effects on structure versus catalysis. Volume changes associated with specific catalytic steps can be particularly informative in understanding pressure effects on enzyme mechanisms.
Ensuring reproducible results when working with pressure-adapted enzymes presents several unique challenges. Recommended strategies include:
Standardized pressure treatment protocols:
Use calibrated pressure equipment with precise control
Document pressure ramping rates and holding times
Maintain consistent temperature during pressure treatment
Include pressure-stable control samples in experiments
Protein preparation consistency:
Standardize expression conditions (particularly temperature and induction parameters)
Establish rigorous purification protocols with quality control checkpoints
Characterize protein batches (circular dichroism, thermal stability, activity assays)
Store samples with pressure-protective additives (glycerol, specific salts)
Experimental design considerations:
Include technical and biological replicates
Perform pressure cycling experiments to assess reversibility
Use internal standards appropriate for high-pressure experiments
Document pre-experimental history of protein samples
Data analysis and reporting:
Apply appropriate statistical tests for pressure-dependent data
Report detailed methodological parameters in publications
Share raw data to enable meta-analysis
Use consistent data normalization approaches
By implementing these strategies, researchers can improve reproducibility and enable meaningful comparison of results across different laboratories studying pressure-adapted enzymes.
Based on the current state of knowledge reflected in the search results, several promising research directions emerge:
Structural biology under pressure:
Determination of high-resolution crystal structure under various pressure conditions
Comparison with mesophilic homologs to identify pressure-adaptation features
Investigation of pressure-dependent conformational changes using spectroscopic methods
Metabolic integration:
Systems biology approach to understand nucleotide metabolism under pressure
Metabolomics studies of guanine nucleotide pools at different pressures
Investigation of potential moonlighting functions under pressure stress
Evolutionary aspects:
Comparative genomics across piezophilic bacteria
Ancestral sequence reconstruction and functional characterization
Identification of convergent adaptations to high pressure
Biotechnological applications:
Engineering pressure-stable variants with enhanced catalytic properties
Development of high-pressure biocatalytic processes
Exploration of substrate promiscuity for synthesis of modified nucleotides
These research directions build upon the foundation of knowledge about P. profundum biology, particularly its adaptation to high-pressure environments, while expanding into new areas with both fundamental and applied significance.