Recombinant Photobacterium profundum lysine--tRNA ligase (lysS) is a partial recombinant protein derived from the lysS gene, which encodes a lysyl-tRNA synthetase. This enzyme catalyzes the aminoacylation of lysine to tRNA<sup>Lys</sup>, a critical step in protein translation. The reaction proceeds via a two-step mechanism:
Activation: Lysine is coupled to ATP, forming a lysyl-adenylate intermediate.
Transfer: The activated lysine is transferred to the 3'-end of tRNA<sup>Lys</sup>, releasing AMP and pyrophosphate .
The recombinant enzyme is produced in heterologous hosts such as E. coli, yeast, baculovirus, or mammalian cells, with purity ≥85% as verified by SDS-PAGE .
While detailed kinetic parameters for P. profundum lysS are unavailable, comparative data from homologs provide insights:
Note: Data for P. profundum lysS not explicitly reported; values represent homologous systems.
Photobacterium profundum is a piezopsychrophilic bacterium adapted to deep-sea environments . Its genome includes a suite of tRNA synthetases (e.g., glyS, tyrS, pheS), suggesting a robust translation machinery optimized for extreme conditions . The lysS gene is part of this conserved set, though pressure-specific regulatory mechanisms (e.g., quorum sensing) for luxrib operons in P. profundum differ from other bioluminescent bacteria .
Lysyl-tRNA synthetases are targets for antimicrobial agents. For example, inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis LysRS (e.g., compound 1) disrupt lysine charging, stalling protein synthesis . While P. profundum lysS has not been directly targeted, its recombinant form could serve as a model for studying inhibitor design or tRNA modification roles in extremophiles.
KEGG: ppr:PBPRA0570
STRING: 298386.PBPRA0570
Photobacterium profundum lysS encodes a lysine-tRNA ligase (LysRS) that belongs to the class-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family. The protein consists of 502 amino acids with a molecular weight of approximately 57.1 kDa . Like other class-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, it likely has two primary domains: a smaller N-terminal domain that binds the tRNA anticodon and a larger C-terminal domain with the catalytic activity characteristic of class II synthetases . The enzyme catalyzes the attachment of lysine to its cognate tRNA, which is an essential step in protein synthesis.
While E. coli possesses two isoforms of lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysS and LysU), with LysU being expressed under stress conditions like heat shock , P. profundum SS9 appears to have adapted its protein expression systems to function optimally under high-pressure conditions. When expressing P. profundum lysS recombinantly, researchers should consider that this protein evolved to function in a high-pressure environment (approximately 28 MPa), which may affect its stability and activity when expressed in standard laboratory conditions .
Based on similar work with E. coli lysyl-tRNA synthetase, an effective approach would be to use a tac promoter fusion system for overproduction . The protein can be expressed in E. coli, as demonstrated by similar experiments with other P. profundum proteins . When designing expression constructs, it's advisable to include affinity tags for purification while ensuring they don't interfere with the protein's structure or function. Codon optimization might also be necessary when expressing in heterologous hosts due to potential codon usage bias differences between P. profundum and the expression host.
While specific data on P. profundum lysS's pressure adaptation is limited in the provided search results, insights can be drawn from studies on other proteins from this organism. Cytochrome P450 from P. profundum SS9 shows pressure-induced transitions characterized by volume changes (ΔV) of around -100 to -200 mL/mol and a P1/2 of 300-800 bar, which is close to P. profundum's natural habitat pressure . For lysS, pressure adaptation might involve:
Altered protein conformational dynamics that maintain activity at high pressure
Modified substrate binding pocket architecture
Changes in protein hydration and water accessibility to active sites
Adaptations in protein-protein interactions under pressure
Research methodologies should include:
Comparative activity assays at different pressures (0.1-80 MPa)
Pressure perturbation spectroscopy to analyze conformational changes
Molecular dynamics simulations under various pressure conditions
Site-directed mutagenesis of residues hypothesized to be involved in pressure adaptation
Based on the synthetic lethality observed between fabD and pfaA in P. profundum SS9 , similar investigations with lysS could reveal important pathway interactions. A recommended methodological framework would include:
Construction of conditional mutants: Create strains with inducible expression of lysS to avoid lethality during strain construction.
Genome-wide screening: Employ transposon mutagenesis or CRISPR interference screens in the conditional lysS background to identify synthetic lethal or sick interactions.
Complementation studies: Express heterologous lysS variants to test for functional conservation and pathway complementation.
P. profundum SS9 is both piezophilic (pressure-loving) and psychrophilic (cold-loving), requiring careful experimental design to distinguish these effects:
Orthogonal experimental design: Establish a matrix of conditions varying both temperature (4-30°C) and pressure (0.1-60 MPa) independently.
Comparative analysis with mesophilic homologs: Express lysS from non-piezophilic organisms alongside P. profundum lysS and compare their activities under various pressure/temperature combinations.
Thermal stability vs. pressure stability analysis: Employ differential scanning calorimetry at various pressures to generate a comprehensive stability landscape.
Kinetic parameter determination: Measure enzyme kinetics (kcat, KM) across the temperature/pressure matrix to identify parameters most affected by each variable.
Based on successful purification of E. coli lysyl-tRNA synthetase and other similar proteins, a multi-step purification strategy is recommended:
Initial capture: Affinity chromatography using either:
Nickel-NTA (if His-tagged)
Glutathione sepharose (if GST-tagged)
Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography
Given the theoretical pI of P. profundum lysS, use anion exchange at pH 8.0
Polishing step: Size exclusion chromatography to ensure homogeneity and remove aggregates
Quality control assessments:
A comprehensive activity assessment should include:
Aminoacylation assay conditions optimization:
| Parameter | Range to test | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| pH | 6.5-8.5 | Test in 0.5 increments |
| Temperature | 4-30°C | Include 15°C (growth optimum for SS9) |
| Pressure | 0.1-60 MPa | Include 28 MPa (natural habitat) |
| Salt concentration | 100-500 mM NaCl | SS9 is moderately halophilic |
| Mg²⁺ concentration | 1-20 mM | Critical for ATP binding |
| ATP concentration | 0.1-5 mM | Substrate for reaction |
| Lysine concentration | 0.1-5 mM | Substrate for reaction |
| tRNA^Lys concentration | 0.1-10 μM | Substrate for reaction |
Kinetic parameters determination:
KM and kcat for all three substrates (ATP, lysine, tRNA^Lys)
Product inhibition studies
pH rate profiles to determine optimal conditions
Pressure effects characterization:
Activity vs. pressure plots
Determination of pressure optima
Calculation of activation volumes
Multiple complementary approaches should be employed:
Circular dichroism spectroscopy: To assess secondary structure content and thermal stability
Intrinsic fluorescence measurements: To evaluate tertiary structure integrity
Size exclusion chromatography with multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS): To determine oligomeric state and homogeneity
Activity assays under various conditions:
Standard assay measuring aminoacylation activity
ATP-PPi exchange assay to assess amino acid activation
Thermal shift assays in the presence and absence of substrates
Comparative analysis with mesophilic homologs: Benchmark against well-characterized E. coli LysS/LysU
Complementation testing: Ability to complement E. coli lysS/lysU mutants
Given the known crystal structure of E. coli LysU at 2.8 Å resolution , several approaches can be applied:
Homology modeling and molecular dynamics simulations:
Generate a structural model of P. profundum lysS based on E. coli LysU
Perform comparative MD simulations at various pressures
X-ray crystallography under pressure:
Crystallize P. profundum lysS
Collect diffraction data at various pressures using specialized equipment
High-pressure NMR studies:
Investigate structural changes and dynamics under pressure
Identify regions with altered flexibility or conformation
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry:
Compare exchange rates at different pressures
Identify pressure-sensitive regions of the protein
Mutational analysis targeting unique residues:
Identify residues unique to P. profundum lysS compared to mesophilic homologs
Create point mutations and assess pressure sensitivity
Lysyl-tRNA synthetases demonstrate important differences in substrate recognition that affect their function:
Lysine analog recognition:
LysRS1 and LysRS2 show significant differences in their potential to bind lysine analogs with backbone replacements
S-(2-aminoethyl)-L-cysteine is a poor substrate for LysRS1 but can be utilized by LysRS2
P. profundum lysS likely belongs to the LysRS2 family based on its sequence, suggesting it may have similar substrate specificities to E. coli LysS/LysU
Comparative substrate specificity analysis:
| Enzyme source | Relative activity with lysine | S-(2-aminoethyl)-L-cysteine utilization | Inhibition by S-(2-aminoethyl)-L-cysteine |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli LysS | 100% | Yes | Strong |
| E. coli LysU | Variable (stress-induced) | Yes | Strong |
| LysRS1 family | 100% | Poor | 200-fold less effective than for LysRS2 |
| P. profundum lysS | To be determined | To be determined | To be determined |
tRNA recognition elements: Comparative analysis of tRNA recognition by various LysRS enzymes would reveal whether P. profundum lysS has evolved specialized features for recognizing tRNA^Lys under high-pressure conditions.
While the search results don't directly address the evolution of lysyl-tRNA synthetases in piezophilic organisms, we can infer potential evolutionary patterns:
Studies on other P. profundum proteins show pressure adaptations, such as in cytochrome P450, which exhibits constrained water access to the active site under high pressure .
Homologous proteins from piezophilic organisms often show amino acid substitutions that favor protein function under high pressure. For instance, a single amino acid substitution was attributed to pressure adaptation in 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase from an extremely piezophilic bacterium .
Comparative genomic analysis between P. profundum and related mesophilic species would likely reveal selective pressure on genes involved in protein synthesis, including lysyl-tRNA synthetase.
The distribution of LysRS1 and LysRS2 in different organisms has been linked to their differential sensitivity to noncanonical amino acids , suggesting that environmental factors can drive the selection of specific aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase variants.
Several potential applications emerge from understanding this pressure-adapted enzyme:
Pressure-stable cell-free protein synthesis systems:
Incorporation of P. profundum lysS into cell-free systems could enhance protein production under high-pressure conditions
This could enable the synthesis of pressure-sensitive proteins that are difficult to produce in conventional systems
Bioorthogonal amino acid incorporation:
If P. profundum lysS shows altered specificity compared to conventional LysRS enzymes, it might be engineered for incorporation of noncanonical amino acids
This could expand the genetic code for novel protein engineering applications
Antibiotic development targeting LysRS:
Model system for studying pressure adaptation:
P. profundum lysS could serve as a model protein for investigating the molecular basis of pressure adaptation
Insights could be applied to engineering pressure-stable variants of industrial enzymes
Based on the genetic approaches used to study other genes in P. profundum SS9 , several strategies could be employed:
Conditional mutant construction:
If lysS is essential, create strains with inducible or temperature-sensitive alleles
This would allow for controlled depletion studies
Domain swapping experiments:
Create chimeric proteins by swapping domains between P. profundum lysS and mesophilic homologs
Identify which domains confer pressure adaptation
Site-directed mutagenesis:
Target residues unique to P. profundum lysS
Create point mutations to assess their contribution to pressure adaptation
Heterologous complementation tests:
Express P. profundum lysS in E. coli or other mesophilic bacteria
Test whether it confers any pressure-related phenotypes
Global gene expression studies:
Analyze transcriptome changes in response to lysS depletion under various pressure conditions
Identify genes that are co-regulated with lysS or respond to lysS perturbation
Suppressor mutation analysis: