Photobacterium profundum is a Gram-negative bacterium known for its ability to thrive under high-pressure conditions, typically found in deep-sea environments . This bacterium has been extensively studied to understand the molecular mechanisms that allow it to adapt to such extreme conditions . One key area of research focuses on the role of various regulatory molecules, including Ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase C (RsmC), in modulating gene expression and stress responses in bacteria . RsmC is a global regulator involved in controlling extracellular proteins/enzymes, RsmB RNA, motility, and virulence .
P. profundum can grow at temperatures ranging from 0°C to 25°C and pressures from 0.1 MPa to 70 MPa, depending on the strain . P. profundum strain SS9, for example, demonstrates optimal growth at 15°C and 28 MPa, classifying it as both a psychrophile and a piezophile . The genome of P. profundum strain SS9 consists of a 4.1-Mbp circular chromosome, a 2.2-Mbp minor circular chromosome, and an 80-kbp circular plasmid . This strain has 14 ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes on chromosome 1 and 1 on chromosome 2, which is the largest number of rRNA genes found in any bacterium .
Homologs of rsmC exist in other E. carotovora subspecies, including atroseptica and betavasculorum . Research indicates that RsmC influences the production of RsmA and rsmB RNA, with phenotypic changes in RsmC− mutants resulting from these regulatory effects .
In Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora, RsmC negatively controls extracellular enzyme production, motility, and virulence . Mutants with disruptions in rsmC exhibit very high basal levels of extracellular enzymes . RsmC, along with FlhDC, globally regulates extracellular proteins/enzymes, rsmB RNA, motility, and virulence .
RsmC is also identified as a novel plasmid-mediated 16S rRNA methylase in Proteus mirabilis . The newly identified 16S rRNA methylase, RmtC, shares a relatively low level of identity with other plasmid-mediated 16S rRNA methylases . Purified histidine-tagged RmtC demonstrates methyltransferase activity against E. coli 16S rRNA in vitro . The presence of rmtC is responsible for high-level resistance against aminoglycosides .
RsmC affects the expression of genes involved in various cellular functions . Mutation of flhC alleviates the ability of RsmC to repress sdhEygfX expression . Mutation of rsmA or rsmC, or overexpression of FlhDC, leads to increased prodigiosin, biosurfactant, swimming, and swarming .
RsmC influences the activity of various genes, as demonstrated by β-galactosidase activity assays . The following table illustrates the impact of RsmC on gene expression:
| Bacterial construct | Relevant characteristics | β-Galactosidase activity |
|---|---|---|
| AC5006(pAKC1243) | RsmC + (gacA-lacZ) | 512 ± 27 |
| AC5149(pAKC1243) | RsmC − (gacA-lacZ) | 3,061 ± 59 |
| AC5006(pAKC1244) | RsmC + (rsmC-lacZ) | 746 ± 33 |
| AC5149(pAKC1244) | RsmC − (rsmC-lacZ) | 2,837 ± 73 |
| AC5006(pAKC1251) | RsmC + (fliA-lacZ) | 2,291 ± 54 |
| AC5149(pAKC1251) | RsmC − (fliA-lacZ) | 3,989 ± 90 |
| AC5050(pCL1920+pAKC1243) | RsmC − (vector + gacA-lacZ) | 3,545 ± 105 |
| AC5050(pAKC975+pAKC1243) | RsmC − (rsmC + gacA-lacZ) | 689 ± 41 |
KEGG: ppr:PBPRA0527
STRING: 298386.PBPRA0527
Based on studies in related bacteria like Erwinia carotovora, rsmC functions as a novel regulatory gene that activates RsmA production and represses extracellular enzyme production, rsmB transcription, and virulence . RsmA is an RNA-binding protein, while rsmB is a regulatory RNA (where Rsm stands for "regulator of secondary metabolites") . In E. carotovora knockout studies, an rsmC mutant showed higher basal levels of various enzymes (Pel, Peh, Cel, Prt) and harpin, as well as increased amounts of rsmB, pel-1, peh-1, celV, and hrpN transcripts, while levels of rsmA transcripts and RsmA protein were low .
In the context of P. profundum, we can hypothesize that rsmC may play a similar regulatory role, potentially with adaptations related to pressure response, as P. profundum strains show remarkable differences in their physiological responses to pressure based on their original isolation depths .
P. profundum strains isolated from different depths exhibit significant genetic and physiological differences that reflect their adaptation to specific environmental conditions:
| Feature | Strain SS9 (Deep-sea) | Strain 3TCK (Shallow-water) |
|---|---|---|
| Pressure adaptation | Piezopsychrophilic | Non-piezophilic |
| Genome structure | Two chromosomes | Two chromosomes |
| Total genome size | Similar to 3TCK | 6,186,725 bp with 41.3% GC |
| Unique elements | Contains an 80 kb plasmid | Lacks the 80 kb plasmid |
| Intergenic regions | Larger (~205 bp) | Large but smaller than SS9 (~167 bp) |
| Gene content | Complete set of tRNA synthetases, selenocysteine synthesis genes, two complete F₀F₁-ATP-synthases, FAS/PKS system for EPA synthesis | Similar core gene content to SS9 |
Both strains have unusually large intergenic regions that have been shown to be transcribed and differentially expressed as a function of pressure, suggesting an important physiological role in pressure adaptation .
Recent research on bacterial methylation systems provides insights that could be relevant to rsmC studies:
Protein lysine methylation has been identified as an important posttranslational modification in bacteria, with roles in immune evasion and adherence to host cells .
In Acinetobacter sp. Tol 5, researchers identified widespread lysine methylation across multiple residues of an outer membrane protein (AtaA) and its dedicated methyltransferase (KmtA) .
Bioinformatic analysis revealed that outer membrane protein lysine methyltransferase genes are widely distributed among gram-negative bacteria, suggesting that methylation is a ubiquitous regulatory mechanism in prokaryotes .
While rsmC is an RNA methyltransferase rather than a protein methyltransferase, similar analytical approaches (particularly LC-MS methods) could be adapted for studying rsmC targets and activities .
In Erwinia species, Southern blot data and PCR analysis demonstrated the presence of rsmC sequences across multiple subspecies, suggesting evolutionary conservation of this regulatory mechanism .
Based on published methodologies for P. profundum research, the following conditions are recommended:
For strain SS9 (deep-sea piezopsychrophilic):
Temperature: Low temperature (4-15°C)
Pressure: High hydrostatic pressure (optimal pressure should be determined experimentally)
Antibiotics (if needed): kanamycin (200 μg/ml) or streptomycin (150 μg/ml)
X-Gal: 40 μg/ml in N,N-dimethylformamide (for reporter constructs)
For strain 3TCK (shallow-water non-piezophilic):
Temperature: Standard marine temperature (15-25°C)
Pressure: Atmospheric pressure
For experimental comparisons, cultures should be grown to late exponential phase before harvesting for analysis . When studying pressure effects, appropriate pressure chambers with temperature control should be employed.
Based on successful approaches for P. profundum genes, the following strategy is recommended:
Gene amplification: PCR amplify the rsmC gene with high-fidelity polymerase using primers with appropriate restriction sites (XhoI and KpnI have been successfully used for other P. profundum genes) .
Vector selection: For P. profundum genes, vectors like pFL122 have been successfully used . Consider including affinity tags for purification.
Transformation method: Introduction of plasmids into P. profundum is best achieved by tri-parental conjugations using helper E. coli strain pRK2073 .
Verification: Confirm correct insertion by restriction digestion and sequencing.
Deletion constructs: For functional studies, deletion constructs can be created by cutting with appropriate restriction enzymes and re-ligating, as demonstrated with the Δ22 deletion obtained by cutting pFL303 with EcoRI .
Expression optimization: Consider using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) to optimize expression conditions by systematically varying parameters like temperature and induction time3.
A comprehensive approach to measuring rsmC methyltransferase activity should include:
In vitro methylation assays:
Incubate purified recombinant rsmC with potential RNA substrates
Use radiolabeled S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) as methyl donor
Quantify incorporation of methyl groups by scintillation counting or autoradiography
Mass spectrometry-based detection:
Functional assays:
Create reporter systems based on known methyltransferase targets
Measure changes in reporter activity in response to rsmC expression
Use complementation assays with rsmC mutants to validate function
Comparative analysis:
Compare activity of rsmC from piezophilic (SS9) and non-piezophilic (3TCK) strains
Test activity under different pressure and temperature conditions
Correlate activity with physiological outcomes
RSM provides a powerful statistical approach for optimizing multiple variables affecting rsmC expression and activity:
Experimental design:
Start with a first-order design (e.g., factorial design) to screen important factors
Identify factors that significantly affect rsmC expression or activity
Follow the path of steepest ascent to approach the optimal region3
Model development:
For initial screening, use linear models to identify direction of improvement
Once near the optimum, apply central composite design to fit quadratic models3
The mathematical form for the path of steepest ascent can be calculated (e.g., ΔTemperature = (1.9/4.6) × ΔTime)3
Optimization process:
For example, if starting with time (30-40 min) and temperature (150-160°C), follow the steepest ascent direction
For each increment in time (e.g., 10 min), calculate the corresponding increment in temperature (e.g., 4°C)3
Continue experiments along this path until reaching maximum response
Design second-order experiments around the maximum to precisely locate the optimum3
Visualization:
Use contour plots to visualize the response surface
The direction of steepest ascent is perpendicular to the contour lines3
In regions with significant curvature, quadratic models are necessary to identify the true optimum3
A systematic approach to identifying rsmC methylation targets should include:
Comparative transcriptomics:
Compare wild-type and rsmC knockout strains using RNA-seq
Identify differentially expressed genes that may be regulated by rsmC
Focus on genes involved in pressure adaptation or stress response
Immunoprecipitation approaches:
Express tagged rsmC protein
Perform RNA immunoprecipitation to capture interacting RNAs
Sequence captured RNAs to identify binding sites and potential methylation targets
Direct detection of methylation:
Predictive bioinformatics:
Analyze sequence and structural motifs in known methyltransferase targets
Scan the P. profundum transcriptome for similar motifs
Prioritize candidates for experimental validation
Based on knowledge of rsmC in E. carotovora, potential targets might include regulatory RNAs similar to rsmB or mRNAs encoding regulatory proteins similar to RsmA .
To investigate pressure effects on rsmC, researchers should consider:
Comparative expression analysis:
Culture SS9 (piezophilic) and 3TCK (non-piezophilic) under varying pressure conditions
Measure rsmC mRNA and protein levels using qRT-PCR and Western blotting
Determine if pressure induces differential expression patterns between strains
Functional genomics approaches:
Create rsmC promoter-reporter fusions
Monitor activity under different pressure conditions
Identify pressure-responsive regulatory elements
Structural adaptation investigation:
Analyze differences in rsmC protein structure between SS9 and 3TCK
Determine if pressure-induced conformational changes affect activity
Identify amino acid substitutions that might contribute to pressure adaptation
Physiological impact assessment:
Based on known functions of methyltransferases and regulators of secondary metabolism:
Regulatory network modulation:
RNA structure and function modification:
Methylation can alter RNA folding and stability
This might affect translation efficiency under different pressure conditions
Could be particularly important for adaptation to extreme environments
Ribosome function modulation:
As a ribosomal RNA methyltransferase, rsmC likely modifies rRNA
Modifications could affect ribosome assembly or function
This might enhance translation under high pressure or low temperature
Integration with stress response pathways:
A systematic approach to differentiate pressure-specific from general stress responses includes:
Multi-factor experimental design:
Test combinations of pressure, temperature, nutrient limitation, and other stressors
Use factorial designs to identify interaction effects
Apply RSM to model complex response surfaces3
Comparative analysis across strains:
Time-course experiments:
Monitor changes in methylation patterns over time after pressure changes
Distinguish immediate responses from long-term adaptations
Correlate with expression of stress response genes
Genetic manipulation:
Create targeted mutations in rsmC and related genes
Test pressure sensitivity of mutants versus sensitivity to other stressors
Use complementation studies to confirm specificity
| Response Type | Characteristics | Experimental Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Pressure-specific | Only occurs under pressure stress; differs between piezophilic and non-piezophilic strains | Compare SS9 and 3TCK under various pressure conditions |
| General stress | Occurs under multiple stress conditions; similar across strains | Test multiple stressors independently and in combination |
| Strain-specific | Occurs in one strain regardless of conditions | Compare baseline expression between strains |
| Adaptive | Develops over time with continued exposure | Time-course experiments with pressure adaptation |
Studying rsmC in P. profundum has broader implications for understanding bacterial adaptation:
Evolutionary insights:
Novel regulatory mechanisms:
Biotechnological applications:
Knowledge of pressure adaptation mechanisms could inform development of pressure-resistant enzymes
Potential applications in deep-sea biotechnology and bioremediation
Might enable new approaches for heterologous expression of deep-sea bacterial proteins
Methodological advances:
Techniques developed for studying methylation in extremophiles can be applied to other systems
Integration of RSM approaches for optimizing complex biological processes3
Novel approaches for detecting and quantifying RNA modifications
Ecological significance:
Better understanding of how bacteria adapt to specific marine niches
Insights into microbial community structure across ocean depth gradients
Potential implications for understanding deep-sea ecosystem function
To ensure robust and interpretable results, the following controls should be included:
For gene expression studies:
Empty vector controls
Inactive mutant rsmC (e.g., with mutations in catalytic residues)
Wild-type and knockout strains for in vivo studies
Housekeeping genes as reference for normalization
For methyltransferase activity assays:
No-enzyme controls
Heat-inactivated enzyme controls
No-substrate controls
Known methyltransferase with defined activity as positive control
For pressure experiments:
For in vivo photoreactivation studies (if examining UV responses):
When faced with inconsistent methylation data, researchers should:
Technical validation:
Repeat experiments with increased replication
Use multiple detection methods (e.g., both radioactive assays and mass spectrometry)
Standardize sample preparation and analysis protocols
Include internal standards for normalization
Biological context consideration:
Test if inconsistencies correlate with specific growth conditions
Examine if there are growth phase-dependent effects
Consider potential post-translational regulation of rsmC activity
Evaluate if heterogeneity represents functional diversity rather than error
Statistical approaches:
Apply appropriate statistical tests for the data distribution
Use models that account for both fixed and random effects
Consider Bayesian approaches for integrating prior knowledge
Use RSM to model complex relationships between variables3
Data integration strategies:
Correlate methylation data with transcriptomics and proteomics
Look for patterns across different types of measurements
Consider evolutionary conservation of methylation sites
Develop predictive models that incorporate multiple data types
Based on current knowledge, the following research directions show particular promise:
Comparative analysis of rsmC across pressure-adapted strains:
Sequence and functional comparison between SS9, 3TCK, and other P. profundum strains
Correlation of rsmC sequence variations with pressure adaptation
Identification of critical domains and residues for pressure-responsive function
Investigation of the role of rsmC in regulating the transcribed intergenic regions:
Integration of methylation mechanisms with other regulatory systems:
Explore interactions with quorum sensing systems (similar to how RsmC effects in E. carotovora are partially dependent on N-(3-oxohexanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone)
Investigate potential coordination with other post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms
Determine how methylation contributes to global gene expression patterns
Application of advanced methodologies: