UDP-N-acetylmuramate--L-alanine ligase (MurC) is an essential enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of peptidoglycan, a crucial component of bacterial cell walls . Specifically, MurC catalyzes the addition of L-alanine to UDP-N-acetylmuramic acid (UNAM) to form UDP-N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine (UMA) . This step is the first committed step in the synthesis of the cytoplasmic precursor of peptidoglycan . MurC is an essential enzyme for bacterial survival, making it an attractive target for antibacterial drug development .
MurC is an ATP-dependent enzyme that belongs to the Mur ligase family . These ligases catalyze the stepwise addition of amino acids to UDP-N-acetylmuramic acid (UDP-MurNAc), building a stem peptide within the bacterial cytoplasm . The mechanism of action involves the activation of the carboxyl group of the nucleotide precursor by ATP, generating an acyl phosphate intermediate and ADP . The acyl phosphate then undergoes a nucleophilic attack by the amino group of the condensing amino acid, leading to the formation of a high-energy tetrahedral intermediate, which eventually breaks down into amide or peptide and phosphate .
MurC has a conserved three-domain architecture . The N-terminal domain binds the UDP portion of UNAM, the central and C-terminal domains form the ATP-binding site, and the C-terminal domain positions the alanine . Crystal structures of Mur ligases reveal 'open' and 'closed' conformations, with the C-terminal domain dictating the conformation .
The manner in which UDP is recognized differs among Mur ligases. In MurC, the uracil of the UNAM substrate binds with its hydrophilic, hydrogen-bonding edge inserted into a shallow pocket on the enzyme surface, with both of the ribose O2′ and O3′ oxygens forming hydrogen bonds with the charged side chain of a conserved aspartic acid residue .
Due to its essential role in bacterial cell wall synthesis, MurC is a target for developing antibacterial compounds . Inhibitors of MurC have been identified, and their effects have been studied in bacterial strains . For example, a pyrazolopyrimidine compound (compound A) was identified as a potent inhibitor of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa MurC .
In an E. coli tolC mutant, compound A led to the accumulation of the MurC substrate and a decrease in the level of product, indicating MurC enzyme inhibition within these cells . Overexpression of MurC in the E. coli tolC mutant led to a significant shift in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), confirming that inhibiting MurC expression results in growth suppression .
In some bacteria, MurC exists as a fusion enzyme with UDP-N-acetylenolpyruvoylglucosamine reductase (MurB) . For example, in Verrucomicrobium spinosum, a fusion enzyme (MurB/C) has been identified and characterized . The purified recombinant fusion enzyme from V. spinosum was shown to have UDP-N-acetylmuramate:L-alanine ligase activity .
Table 1: Kinetic parameters of MurB/C fusion enzyme from Verrucomicrobium spinosum
| Substrate | Apparent $$K_m$$ Value (μM) |
|---|---|
| ATP | 470 |
| UDP-MurNAc | 90 |
| L-alanine | 25 |
Cell wall formation.
KEGG: ppr:PBPRA3214
STRING: 298386.PBPRA3214
UDP-N-acetylmuramate--L-alanine ligase (MurC) is an essential enzyme in bacterial peptidoglycan biosynthesis, catalyzing the addition of L-alanine to UDP-N-acetylmuramic acid (UDP-MurNAc). This represents the first step in peptide stem formation of peptidoglycan, requiring ATP and Mg²⁺ as cofactors. The peptidoglycan layer is crucial for maintaining cellular integrity against osmotic pressure and determining cell shape.
In P. profundum, MurC belongs to the Mur ligase family that sequentially adds amino acids to build the peptidoglycan structure. The reaction follows the general mechanism:
UDP-MurNAc + L-alanine + ATP → UDP-MurNAc-L-alanine + ADP + Pi
This pathway is particularly significant since Mur ligases are attractive antibacterial targets due to their essential role in peptidoglycan biosynthesis . The enzyme's structure and function may have adaptations specific to P. profundum's deep-sea habitat, potentially including pressure-adaptive features in deep-sea strains.
P. profundum has multiple strains adapted to different ocean depths with remarkable physiological differences in pressure response. These adaptations likely affect MurC expression and function:
| Strain | Source | Optimal Growth Temperature | Optimal Pressure | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SS9 | Deep sea (Sulu Sea) | 15°C | 28 MPa | Psychrophile & Piezophile |
| DSJ4 | Ryukyu Trench (5110m) | 10°C | 10 MPa | Piezophile |
| 3TCK | San Diego Bay (shallow) | 9°C | 0.1 MPa | Non-piezophile |
| 1230 | Shallow waters | - | 0.1 MPa | Non-piezophile |
These strain-specific adaptations likely influence MurC in several ways:
Pressure adaptation: MurC from piezophilic strains (SS9, DSJ4) may have structural modifications that maintain functionality under high pressure conditions . These adaptations could include altered amino acid compositions that allow the enzyme to maintain proper folding and flexibility at depths where pressure would typically inhibit protein function.
Temperature sensitivity: Each strain grows at different optimal temperatures, suggesting their MurC enzymes may have different temperature optima for activity . Cold-adapted enzymes typically display higher catalytic efficiency at lower temperatures compared to mesophilic counterparts.
Gene expression regulation: Under suboptimal pressure conditions, P. profundum SS9 upregulates chaperones and DNA repair enzymes , suggesting MurC expression might also be regulated differently in response to environmental stressors.
Evolutionary adaptation: The existence of phylogenetically cohesive "bathytypes" suggests that genetic modifications for depth-specific adaptations can evolve rapidly , potentially affecting MurC structure and function across strains.
For successful recombinant production of P. profundum MurC, several expression systems should be considered:
E. coli expression systems:
BL21(DE3): Most commonly used, suitable for T7 promoter-driven expression
Arctic Express: Contains cold-adapted chaperonins (Cpn10 and Cpn60), beneficial for expressing psychrophilic proteins like those from P. profundum
C41/C43(DE3): Engineered strains that overcome toxicity issues with membrane-associated proteins
Rosetta: Supplies rare codons that might be present in P. profundum genes
Expression parameters optimization:
Temperature: Lower induction temperatures (10-15°C) often yield higher amounts of soluble protein for enzymes from psychrophilic organisms like P. profundum
IPTG concentration: Lower concentrations (0.1-0.5 mM) typically reduce inclusion body formation
Media composition: Rich media with osmolytes may improve yield for marine bacterial proteins
Induction duration: Extended induction times (16-24 hours) at lower temperatures often increase yield
Fusion tags for enhanced solubility and stability:
SUMO tag: Enhances solubility and can be precisely removed by SUMO protease
MBP (maltose-binding protein): Highly soluble carrier that can aid in purification
Thioredoxin: Promotes proper disulfide bond formation
His6 tag: Enables purification by metal affinity chromatography
A comparison of expression conditions for optimal MurC production might yield:
| Expression System | Induction Temperature | IPTG (mM) | Yield (mg/L) | Activity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BL21(DE3), His-tag | 37°C | 1.0 | 8.5 | 65 |
| BL21(DE3), His-tag | 15°C | 0.5 | 14.3 | 85 |
| Arctic Express, His-tag | 10°C | 0.3 | 18.7 | 93 |
| Rosetta, SUMO-tag | 12°C | 0.4 | 22.2 | 95 |
When designing an expression system, consider that P. profundum strains grow at different optimal temperatures—SS9 at 15°C and 3TCK at 9°C —suggesting recombinant expression may benefit from similarly low temperatures to ensure proper folding.
Purifying recombinant P. profundum MurC requires a strategic approach to maintain both purity and enzymatic activity:
Initial capture steps:
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged proteins
Ni-NTA or Co-NTA resins with gradient elution (20-250 mM imidazole)
Consider using EDTA-free protease inhibitors to prevent metal chelation
Affinity chromatography for fusion proteins
Amylose resin for MBP-tagged proteins
Glutathione-Sepharose for GST-tagged proteins
Ion exchange chromatography based on theoretical pI
Calculate pI from amino acid sequence to determine appropriate resin
Intermediate purification:
Tag removal (if necessary)
TEV, PreScission, or SUMO protease cleavage
Reverse IMAC to remove cleaved tag
Ammonium sulfate fractionation
Useful for concentrating protein and removing contaminants
Determine optimal precipitation percentage through pilot experiments
Polishing steps:
Size exclusion chromatography
Superdex 200 or similar for final purification
Provides information on oligomeric state
Hydroxyapatite chromatography
Useful for removing nucleic acid contaminants that may co-purify
Considerations specific to P. profundum MurC:
Cold purification (4-10°C) throughout the process, essential for psychrophilic enzymes
Addition of substrate analogs or product for stabilization during purification
Inclusion of reducing agents (DTT or TCEP) to maintain cysteine residues
Consider adding glycerol (10-20%) to prevent cold denaturation
A representative purification table showing yields and purities:
| Purification Step | Total Protein (mg) | MurC Activity (units) | Specific Activity (units/mg) | Yield (%) | Purification (fold) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude extract | 850 | 42,500 | 50 | 100 | 1 |
| Ni-NTA | 120 | 36,000 | 300 | 85 | 6 |
| Tag removal | 85 | 32,300 | 380 | 76 | 7.6 |
| Ion exchange | 45 | 29,250 | 650 | 69 | 13 |
| Size exclusion | 38 | 27,360 | 720 | 64 | 14.4 |
For piezophilic P. profundum strains like SS9, consider that proteins may have evolved specific structural features for high-pressure environments . These adaptations may affect protein stability during purification at atmospheric pressure, potentially requiring additional stabilizing agents.
Several assays can be employed to measure P. profundum MurC activity, each with specific advantages:
Coupled enzyme assays:
ATP consumption coupled to NADH oxidation via pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase
Monitors ADP formation by following NADH decrease at 340 nm
Advantages: Continuous measurement, high sensitivity
Limitations: Coupling enzymes may be affected by experimental conditions (temperature, pressure)
Direct product detection:
HPLC separation of UDP-MurNAc-L-alanine from UDP-MurNAc
LC-MS identification and quantification
Advantages: Direct measurement, high specificity
Limitations: Requires specialized equipment, not continuous
Inorganic phosphate release assays:
Colorimetric detection using malachite green
Advantages: Simple, high sensitivity, compatible with high-throughput screening
Limitations: Endpoint assay, potential interference from buffers containing phosphate
Radioactive assays:
Using 14C-labeled L-alanine or 32P-ATP
Quantification by scintillation counting after product separation
Advantages: Extremely high sensitivity, direct measurement
Limitations: Handling radioactive materials, waste disposal challenges
For studying MurC activity in piezophilic strains, specialized high-pressure equipment would be necessary to perform assays under native conditions. Activity comparisons between strains should use consistent methods, as seen in studies with E. coli MurC where cellular activity was measured by substrate accumulation and product decrease .
| Assay Type | Detection Limit | High-throughput Compatible | Compatible with High Pressure | Time Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coupled enzyme | 5-10 nmol/min/mg | Yes | Limited | Minutes (continuous) |
| HPLC/LC-MS | 0.5-1 nmol/min/mg | No | No | Hours (endpoint) |
| Phosphate release | 2-5 nmol/min/mg | Yes | Yes | 30 min (endpoint) |
| Radioactive | 0.1-0.5 nmol/min/mg | No | Yes | Hours (endpoint) |
When developing assays, studies with E. coli MurC have shown that substrate levels can be monitored over time to confirm enzyme inhibition, with experiments showing increases in substrate levels and decreases in product levels when MurC is inhibited .
The effect of hydrostatic pressure on MurC activity varies significantly between P. profundum strains based on their evolutionary adaptations:
Enzymatic activity under pressure:
Kinetic parameter shifts:
Km values may decrease under pressure for piezophilic MurC, indicating increased substrate affinity
kcat values might be maintained or enhanced under pressure for piezophilic enzymes
Volume changes during catalysis (ΔV‡) are typically smaller for pressure-adapted enzymes
Experimental approaches to measure pressure effects:
High-pressure bioreactors with sampling capabilities
Pressure perturbation calorimetry
Custom high-pressure spectroscopic cells for continuous monitoring
A hypothetical dataset comparing MurC relative activity across pressures might show:
| Pressure (MPa) | SS9 MurC Relative Activity (%) | 3TCK MurC Relative Activity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1 (ambient) | 60 | 100 |
| 10 | 85 | 70 |
| 28 | 100 | 35 |
| 50 | 75 | 10 |
Growth experiments with P. profundum strains should be performed in pressure vessels with no gas space, as described in previous studies . Equipment used for high-pressure cultivation includes heat-sealable plastic bulbs containing media that are placed in pressure vessels .
The pressure adaptation of SS9 is reflected in its optimal growth at 28 MPa, while strain 3TCK grows optimally at 0.1 MPa . These growth optima likely correlate with the pressure optima for their respective MurC enzymes due to evolutionary adaptation of the entire cellular machinery.
P. profundum MurC from piezophilic strains likely exhibits several structural adaptations that enable function in high-pressure environments:
Protein compressibility adaptations:
Reduced void volumes within the protein structure
Optimization of internal packing to minimize compressibility
Strategic placement of water-filled cavities to buffer pressure effects
Active site modifications:
More flexible active site to maintain catalytic efficiency under pressure
Reduced ΔV of reaction to minimize pressure inhibition
Altered charge distribution to stabilize transition states under pressure
Surface characteristics:
Increased number of surface-exposed hydrophilic residues
Modified surface charge distribution
Optimized salt bridge networks that are less affected by pressure
Amino acid composition shifts:
Increased glycine content for enhanced backbone flexibility
Reduced proline content to avoid structural rigidity
More hydrophobic interactions that are strengthened by pressure
Comparative analysis of amino acid composition between piezophilic and non-piezophilic MurC might show patterns similar to those observed in other P. profundum proteins:
| Feature | Piezophilic MurC (SS9) | Non-piezophilic MurC (3TCK) | Functional Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glycine content | Higher | Lower | Increases backbone flexibility |
| Charged residues | More evenly distributed | Clustered | Prevents pressure denaturation |
| Hydrophobic core | Optimized packing | Standard packing | Minimizes void volumes |
| Surface charges | Higher number | Lower number | Enhances hydration |
Studies on P. profundum have shown that deep-sea strains upregulate stress response genes like htpG, dnaK, dnaJ, and groEL in response to atmospheric pressure , suggesting MurC might also need chaperone assistance when not at optimal pressure.
Site-directed mutagenesis provides a powerful approach to probe the catalytic mechanism of P. profundum MurC:
Key residues to target:
Catalytic residues: Those directly involved in bond making/breaking
Substrate binding residues: Those that interact with UDP-MurNAc, L-alanine, or ATP
Metal-coordinating residues: Those that coordinate Mg²⁺
Conformational change mediators: Residues at domain interfaces or hinge regions
Types of mutations to consider:
Conservative mutations: Substituting with similar amino acids to assess specific contributions
Alanine scanning: Systematic replacement with alanine to identify essential residues
Charge inversions: Changing charge to assess electrostatic contributions
Cysteine substitutions: For subsequent chemical modification studies
Analytical approaches:
Steady-state kinetics to determine changes in Km and kcat
Pre-steady-state kinetics to identify rate-limiting steps
Isothermal titration calorimetry to measure binding thermodynamics
Structural studies of mutant proteins
Pressure-related investigations:
Comparing mutations' effects at different pressures
Identifying pressure-sensing residues
Engineering pressure-tolerant variants of pressure-sensitive MurC
To implement these studies, genetic tools developed for P. profundum can be utilized, such as tri-parental conjugations using helper E. coli strain pRK2073 . Plasmid construction techniques as described for other P. profundum genes can be adapted for MurC mutagenesis.
Example experimental design for site-directed mutagenesis:
| Residue | Proposed Function | Mutation | Expected Outcome | Experimental Verification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asp123* | Mg²⁺ coordination | D123N | Reduced activity, higher Km for ATP | Activity assays, ITC |
| Arg175* | UDP-MurNAc binding | R175A | Higher Km for UDP-MurNAc | Substrate binding assays |
| Lys215* | ATP binding | K215A | Increased Km for ATP | ATP binding assays |
| His308* | Catalytic base | H308A | Severely reduced kcat | pH-rate profile studies |
*Note: These residue numbers are hypothetical and would need to be identified from sequence alignments or structural models of P. profundum MurC.
Inhibitor studies of P. profundum MurC can provide valuable insights for antibacterial drug development:
Identification of novel inhibitory scaffolds:
High-throughput screening of chemical libraries
Fragment-based drug discovery approaches
Natural product screening
Virtual screening using homology models
Structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies:
Systematic modification of lead compounds
Determination of pharmacophore requirements
Optimization of potency, selectivity, and physicochemical properties
Comparison with MurC from pathogenic bacteria:
Cross-species activity profiling
Identification of conserved binding sites
Use of P. profundum MurC as a model for hard-to-express MurC enzymes
Inhibition mechanism studies:
Determination of inhibition modality (competitive, uncompetitive, noncompetitive)
Time-dependent inhibition analysis
Structure-based investigations of binding modes
Examples from previous MurC inhibitor studies show that pyrazolopyrimidine compounds (like compound A) can potently inhibit MurC from various bacterial species, including E. coli and P. aeruginosa . Cellular studies with E. coli tolC mutants have demonstrated that MurC inhibition results in accumulation of the UDP-MurNAc substrate and decreased levels of the UDP-MurNAc-L-alanine product .
Experiments have shown that overexpression of MurC in E. coli tolC mutant leads to a ≥16-fold shift in MIC for compound A, confirming that inhibition of MurC expression results in growth suppression . This validates MurC as an antibacterial target.
Enzyme source controls:
Purified MurC from multiple P. profundum strains (piezophilic SS9 and non-piezophilic 3TCK)
MurC from non-piezophilic reference organisms (e.g., E. coli)
Site-directed mutants with altered pressure sensitivity
Experimental condition controls:
Temperature control (±0.1°C) during pressure application
pH stability verification (some buffers have pressure-dependent pKa)
Substrate stability under pressure
Equipment calibration under pressure
Activity measurement controls:
Pressure effects on any coupling enzymes or detection reagents
Reversibility of pressure effects
Time-course measurements to ensure linearity
Multiple pressure application/release cycles
Data analysis controls:
Normalization to ambient pressure activity
Statistical analysis of pressure dependence
Comparison to theoretical models of pressure effects
Protocol considerations for high-pressure enzyme assays:
| Control Type | Implementation | Purpose | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buffer pressure sensitivity | Measure pH under pressure | Account for pressure-induced pH shifts | Correction factors for activity calculations |
| Enzyme stability | Pre-incubate at pressure, measure remaining activity | Distinguish activity changes from denaturation | Separation of reversible vs. irreversible effects |
| Non-piezophilic MurC | Parallel assays with E. coli MurC | Differentiate adaptation from general pressure effects | Confirmation of piezophilic adaptations |
| Temperature effects | Conduct assays at multiple temperature-pressure combinations | Separate temperature and pressure effects | Temperature-pressure phase diagrams |
High-pressure experiments with P. profundum have been conducted using pressure vessels and heat-sealable plastic bulbs containing media with no gas space . Similar approaches could be adapted for enzyme assays.
Recombinant P. profundum MurC offers a valuable model system for studying extremozymes (enzymes from extreme environments):
Pressure adaptation studies:
MurC from piezophilic strains (SS9, DSJ4) versus non-piezophilic strains (3TCK) provides natural variants adapted to different pressure environments
Comparison reveals molecular basis of pressure adaptation
Insights can be applied to other pressure-sensitive enzymes or processes
Cold adaptation mechanisms:
Molecular evolution studies:
Enzyme engineering applications:
Identifying pressure-resistant structural elements
Creating chimeric enzymes with enhanced pressure tolerance
Developing enzymes for industrial processes under non-standard conditions
P. profundum's genome shows evidence of rapid adaptation to depth-specific environmental stresses, including temperature, pressure, and nutrient availability . This makes its enzymes, including MurC, excellent models for studying how proteins adapt to extreme conditions.
The fact that different strains of P. profundum have been isolated from environments ranging from shallow waters (3TCK from San Diego Bay) to deep sea (SS9 from Sulu Sea) provides a natural experimental system with enzymes adapted to different pressures but still within the same species, minimizing other evolutionary variables.