Recombinant Photobacterium profundum UPF0434 protein PBPRA2383 (PBPRA2383)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder

Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.

Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.

Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless otherwise requested. Dry ice shipping requires prior communication and incurs additional charges.

Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Before opening, briefly centrifuge the vial to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can be used as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.

The tag type is determined during the production process. If you require a specific tag type, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.

Synonyms
PBPRA2383; UPF0434 protein PBPRA2383
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-59
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Photobacterium profundum (strain SS9)
Target Names
PBPRA2383
Target Protein Sequence
MDHRLLEIVA CPVCKGKLNY DKEKNELICK FDRLAYPIQD GIPVLIEPEA RTLSSDEVK
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is PBPRA2383 and what organism does it originate from?

PBPRA2383 is a protein belonging to the UPF0434 family found in Photobacterium profundum strain SS9, a deep-sea gram-negative bacterium adapted to high-pressure environments. This protein is part of a group of proteins with unknown function (UPF) that are subjects of ongoing research to determine their biological roles. The recombinant form is typically produced in expression systems like E. coli for research purposes, similar to other recombinant proteins from the same organism .

What are the optimal storage conditions for recombinant PBPRA2383?

Recombinant PBPRA2383 stability depends on multiple factors including buffer composition, temperature, and protein formulation. For lyophilized preparations, 12-month stability can be expected when stored at -20°C/-80°C. Liquid formulations typically maintain stability for approximately 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. For working solutions, storage at 4°C is recommended for up to one week, with repeated freezing and thawing strongly discouraged as it can lead to protein denaturation and loss of activity .

What is the typical purity level of commercially available recombinant PBPRA2383?

Research-grade recombinant PBPRA2383 typically has a purity of >85% as determined by SDS-PAGE analysis. For studies requiring higher purity, especially those involving structural biology or sensitive functional assays, researchers should verify if higher purity preparations (>95%) are available or implement additional purification steps using chromatographic techniques .

What expression systems are optimal for producing functional PBPRA2383?

The optimal expression system for PBPRA2383 is typically E. coli, similar to other recombinant proteins from P. profundum. When designing experiments, researchers should consider the following expression system comparison:

Expression SystemAdvantagesDisadvantagesRecommended for PBPRA2383
E. coliHigh yield, cost-effective, rapid expressionLimited post-translational modificationsPrimary choice for basic studies
Insect cellsBetter folding, some PTMsHigher cost, longer production timeComplex functional studies
Mammalian cellsFull range of PTMs, native-like foldingHighest cost, complex protocols, lower yieldsNot typically necessary unless specific PTMs required

E. coli remains the standard choice for PBPRA2383 expression, particularly BL21(DE3) strains with pET vector systems, as they provide good yields of soluble protein under optimized induction conditions .

How should experiments be designed to assess PBPRA2383 function in pressure adaptation studies?

When designing experiments to investigate PBPRA2383's potential role in pressure adaptation, a randomized block design is recommended to account for variables that might influence results. The experimental design should include:

  • Control groups (wild-type P. profundum strains and knockout strains)

  • Variable pressure conditions (atmospheric to deep-sea pressures)

  • Multiple biological replicates (minimum n=3)

Response variables should include growth rates, gene expression profiles, and protein activity measurements. The use of factorial experimental design allows researchers to examine interactions between pressure and other environmental factors (temperature, salinity) that might influence PBPRA2383 function .

What reconstitution protocols optimize PBPRA2383 stability and function?

For optimal reconstitution of lyophilized PBPRA2383:

  • Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to collect all material at the bottom

  • Reconstitute using deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL

  • Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (with 50% being optimal for long-term storage)

  • Prepare small working aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

  • Validate protein activity after reconstitution using appropriate functional assays

This protocol minimizes protein aggregation and maintains functional integrity for downstream applications .

How can structure-function relationships of PBPRA2383 be investigated using computational and experimental approaches?

Investigating structure-function relationships of PBPRA2383 requires a multi-faceted approach:

Computational methods:

  • Homology modeling using related UPF family proteins as templates

  • Molecular dynamics simulations under different pressure conditions

  • Binding site prediction and virtual screening for potential ligands

Experimental validation:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of predicted functional residues

  • Circular dichroism spectroscopy to assess secondary structure changes under varying conditions

  • X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM for definitive structural determination

The combination of these approaches allows researchers to generate hypotheses about PBPRA2383 function based on structural features and test these hypotheses experimentally, particularly focusing on pressure-responsive structural elements .

What methodologies are most effective for studying protein-protein interactions involving PBPRA2383?

For studying PBPRA2383 interactions with other proteins, researchers should implement a complementary set of methodologies:

TechniqueResolutionAdvantagesLimitationsData Output
Pull-down assaysLowSimple, identifies direct binding partnersNon-specific binding, requires antibodiesQualitative
Co-immunoprecipitationMediumWorks with endogenous proteinsRequires specific antibodiesSemi-quantitative
Surface Plasmon ResonanceHighReal-time kinetics, no labels neededRequires purified proteinsQuantitative binding constants
Proximity Labeling (BioID)MediumIdentifies transient interactionsRequires genetic modificationNetwork identification
Crosslinking Mass SpectrometryHighIdentifies interaction interfacesComplex data analysisStructural interaction data

A tiered approach beginning with pull-down assays followed by validation using higher resolution techniques provides the most comprehensive understanding of PBPRA2383's interaction network .

How does PBPRA2383 compare functionally to other UPF proteins found in extremophiles?

While specific functional data for PBPRA2383 is limited, comparisons with other UPF proteins from extremophiles suggest potential roles in stress response. Functional comparison should assess:

  • Sequence conservation patterns across pressure-adapted microorganisms

  • Expression profiles under stress conditions (pressure, temperature, oxidative stress)

  • Phenotypic effects of gene knockout/overexpression

  • Structural adaptations that correlate with environmental niche

These comparative analyses may reveal whether PBPRA2383 represents a unique adaptation to deep-sea environments or shares common mechanisms with other extremophile stress-response proteins .

What are common challenges in expressing soluble PBPRA2383 and how can they be addressed?

Researchers frequently encounter challenges when expressing PBPRA2383 and similar proteins from deep-sea organisms. The most common issues and solutions include:

ChallengePossible CausesSolutions
Low solubilityImproper folding, hydrophobic regionsLower induction temperature (16-20°C), use solubility tags (SUMO, MBP), optimize buffer composition
Poor expression yieldCodon bias, toxic to hostUse codon-optimized sequence, use tightly regulated expression systems, try different E. coli strains
Aggregation after purificationBuffer incompatibility, concentration too highScreen buffer conditions (pH, salt concentration), add stabilizing agents (glycerol, arginine)
Loss of activityImproper folding, missing cofactorsInclude cofactors in purification buffers, validate with functional assays

Systematic optimization of expression conditions through factorial experimental design can identify optimal parameters for soluble expression .

How should researchers analyze and interpret contradictory data regarding PBPRA2383 function?

When faced with contradictory data regarding PBPRA2383 function, researchers should:

  • Evaluate methodological differences between studies (expression systems, tags, buffer conditions)

  • Assess the sensitivity and specificity of assays used to measure protein function

  • Consider environmental variables that might influence protein behavior (pressure, temperature, pH)

  • Use statistical approaches like meta-analysis to integrate findings across multiple studies

  • Design definitive experiments that directly address contradictions with appropriate controls

In publications, researchers should present both supporting and contradicting evidence, avoiding confirmation bias. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) can help determine if observed differences are statistically significant or within expected experimental variation .

What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing pressure-dependent effects on PBPRA2383 activity?

For analyzing pressure-dependent effects on PBPRA2383 activity, the following statistical approaches are recommended:

  • Multiple regression analysis: To model relationships between pressure (independent variable) and various measurements of PBPRA2383 activity (dependent variables)

  • Two-way ANOVA: To assess the effects of pressure and other factors (temperature, pH, salt concentration) as well as their interactions

  • Repeated measures design: For tracking changes in PBPRA2383 activity across a pressure gradient using the same protein preparation

  • Goodness of fit analysis: Using the coefficient of determination (r²) to assess how well pressure-response models explain observed activity variations

For proper interpretation, researchers should report both statistical significance (p-values) and effect sizes to provide a complete picture of pressure effects on PBPRA2383 activity .

What mass spectrometry approaches are most informative for characterizing PBPRA2383 post-translational modifications?

For comprehensive analysis of potential post-translational modifications (PTMs) in PBPRA2383, the following mass spectrometry approaches are most valuable:

  • Bottom-up proteomics: Enzymatic digestion followed by LC-MS/MS to identify specific modified residues

  • Top-down proteomics: Analysis of intact protein to determine the stoichiometry of modifications

  • Middle-down approach: Limited proteolysis to generate large peptides that maintain the context of modifications

While PTMs in bacterially expressed recombinant proteins are typically limited, native PBPRA2383 from P. profundum may contain modifications relevant to function. Particular attention should be paid to potential phosphorylation sites that might be involved in signaling pathways responsive to pressure changes .

How can researchers design experiments to determine if PBPRA2383 has enzymatic activity?

To investigate potential enzymatic activity of PBPRA2383, researchers should design a systematic screening approach:

  • Sequence-based prediction: Analyze the protein sequence for known catalytic motifs or structural similarities to characterized enzymes

  • Activity screening: Test the protein against a panel of potential substrates from major enzyme classes (hydrolases, transferases, oxidoreductases)

  • Cofactor supplementation: Perform activity assays in the presence of common cofactors (metals, NAD(P)H, ATP)

  • Pressure-dependent analysis: Compare activity under atmospheric versus high-pressure conditions

Data should be collected using multiple detection methods (spectrophotometric, fluorometric, and chromatographic) to maximize the chances of detecting subtle enzymatic activities. Control experiments must include heat-denatured protein and buffer-only conditions .

How might PBPRA2383 be utilized in comparative studies of pressure adaptation mechanisms?

PBPRA2383 offers valuable opportunities for comparative studies of pressure adaptation across various marine organisms. A comprehensive research program might include:

  • Phylogenetic analysis of PBPRA2383 homologs across pressure-adapted and non-adapted species

  • Heterologous expression of PBPRA2383 in pressure-sensitive organisms to assess if it confers pressure resistance

  • Structural comparison of PBPRA2383 with homologs from different depth zones to identify pressure-adaptive features

  • Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling to position PBPRA2383 within pressure-responsive pathways

Such studies would contribute to understanding fundamental mechanisms of adaptation to extreme environments and potentially identify molecular features that enable protein function under high pressure conditions .

What experimental designs would best elucidate the in vivo function of PBPRA2383?

To determine the in vivo function of PBPRA2383, researchers should implement a multi-faceted experimental design incorporating:

ApproachMethodologyExpected OutcomesLimitations
Gene knockoutCRISPR-Cas or homologous recombinationPhenotypic changes indicating functionPossible redundancy masking effects
Conditional expressionInducible promoter systemsTemporal correlation of expression with functionTechnical challenges in P. profundum
Localization studiesFluorescent protein fusion or immunolocalizationSubcellular location suggesting functional roleTagging may affect function
Interactome mappingAffinity purification-mass spectrometryIdentification of interaction partnersComplex data interpretation
Complementation studiesExpression in knockout strainsRestoration of function confirming causalityMay require optimization for expression

A randomized block design should be employed when testing phenotypes under different pressure conditions to control for batch-to-batch variation. Quantitative measurements (growth rates, gene expression, metabolite levels) should be analyzed using appropriate statistical methods to determine significance .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.