Recombinant Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. laumondii UPF0133 protein plu3840 (plu3840)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, provided as a reference for your consideration.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
plu3840Nucleoid-associated protein plu3840
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-109
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. laumondii (strain DSM 15139 / CIP 105565 / TT01)
Target Names
plu3840
Target Protein Sequence
MFGKGGLGNL MKQAQQMQDK MQKMQEEIAS LEVTGESGAG LVKVTINGAH NCRRVEIDPS LMEDDKEMLE DLIAAAFNDA ARRIEETQKE KMAGISSGMQ LPPGFKMPF
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein binds to DNA, altering its conformation. It may play a role in gene expression regulation, nucleoid organization, and DNA protection.
Database Links

KEGG: plu:plu3840

STRING: 243265.plu3840

Protein Families
YbaB/EbfC family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm, nucleoid.

Q&A

What is the UPF0133 protein plu3840 from Photorhabdus luminescens?

The UPF0133 protein plu3840 is a protein of unknown function (UPF) encoded by the plu3840 gene in the genome of Photorhabdus luminescens subspecies laumondii. As a member of the UPF0133 family, it belongs to a group of proteins whose functional roles remain largely uncharacterized but are conserved across various bacterial species. The protein is of interest to researchers due to its potential involvement in bacterial metabolism, survival mechanisms, or virulence factors associated with P. luminescens, a bacterium known for its symbiotic relationship with entomopathogenic nematodes and pathogenicity toward insects.

How does the expression of recombinant plu3840 differ from native protein expression?

The expression of recombinant plu3840 presents several distinct characteristics compared to native protein expression. When expressed recombinantly, the protein typically includes fusion tags (such as His-tag or GST) to facilitate purification, which may affect protein folding or activity. Expression systems like E. coli often yield higher quantities but may introduce challenges related to protein solubility or post-translational modifications that are naturally present in P. luminescens.

To optimize recombinant expression, researchers should consider conducting experimental comparisons using multiple expression systems. The table below outlines typical differences observed between native and recombinant expression of bacterial proteins like plu3840:

ParameterNative ExpressionRecombinant Expression
YieldLower, physiological levelsHigher, controlled induction
FoldingNatural cellular machineryMay require optimization
Post-translational modificationsNative modifications presentMay be absent or different
SolubilityGenerally soluble in native environmentVariable, often requires optimization
Fusion partnersNoneOften includes tags (His, GST, MBP)
FunctionFull native activityMay require tag removal for full activity

When designing expression studies, temperature, induction conditions, and host strain selection should be carefully considered to maintain functional integrity of the protein .

What are the optimal conditions for expressing recombinant plu3840 protein?

The optimal conditions for expressing recombinant plu3840 protein depend on several factors that must be systematically evaluated. Based on experimental approaches used for similar bacterial proteins, the following methodology is recommended:

  • Expression system selection: BL21(DE3) E. coli strains often provide good expression for bacterial proteins. For proteins with potential toxicity, consider using strains with tighter expression control such as BL21(DE3)pLysS.

  • Vector optimization: pET-based vectors with T7 promoters generally yield high expression levels. Consider vectors with different fusion tags (His, GST, MBP) to improve solubility.

  • Induction parameters: Test IPTG concentrations ranging from 0.1 mM to 1.0 mM, combined with varied induction temperatures (15°C, 25°C, 37°C) and durations (4 hours to overnight).

  • Media selection: Compare rich media (LB) versus minimal media supplemented with glucose or glycerol to identify conditions that maximize yield while maintaining proper folding.

A systematic optimization approach using the design of experiments (DOE) methodology is recommended to identify interactions between these variables that affect protein yield and solubility .

What challenges might arise when attempting to determine the function of plu3840?

Determining the function of uncharacterized proteins like plu3840 presents multiple methodological challenges that require a multifaceted approach. Researchers often encounter difficulties including:

  • Sequence homology limitations: UPF proteins by definition lack well-characterized homologs, making sequence-based function prediction challenging.

  • Structural ambiguity: Without crystal structures, predicting functional domains becomes speculative.

  • Expression challenges: Recombinant expression may not reproduce natural folding or essential post-translational modifications.

  • Interaction partners: The protein may function as part of a complex, requiring identification of interaction partners.

To address these challenges, a comprehensive experimental strategy should include:

  • Structural studies (X-ray crystallography or NMR) to identify potential functional domains

  • Genetic knockout studies in P. luminescens to observe phenotypic changes

  • Transcriptomics to identify co-expressed genes under various conditions

  • Pull-down assays to identify protein-protein interactions

  • Metabolomics to detect changes in metabolite profiles following gene disruption

By integrating multiple lines of evidence, contradictory findings can be reconciled to develop a cohesive functional model .

How can contradictory findings about plu3840 function be reconciled in research literature?

When faced with contradictory findings regarding plu3840 function in the literature, researchers should employ a systematic approach to analyze contextual factors that might explain such discrepancies. Based on methodologies for resolving contradictions in biomedical literature, the following framework can be applied:

  • Categorize contextual characteristics of contradictory findings into:

    • Internal factors (species differences, genetic background, developmental stage)

    • External factors (experimental conditions, methodologies, reagents)

    • Endogenous/exogenous factors (natural versus induced expression)

    • Known controversies in the field

    • Actual contradictions requiring further investigation

  • Implement semantic analysis of published claims to identify predication instances (subject-relation-object triples) that appear contradictory. This approach can reveal subtle differences in experimental contexts that explain apparent contradictions .

  • Create a contradiction resolution matrix to document variables that differ between studies showing conflicting results. For example:

StudyClaimed FunctionExpression SystemTemperaturepHBuffer CompositionCell Line/OrganismStatistical Method
Study AEnzymatic activityE. coli BL2137°C7.4Phosphate buffer with Mg2+In vitro assayt-test
Study BNo enzymatic activityP. luminescens28°C6.8Tris buffer without Mg2+Native conditionsANOVA

In this hypothetical example, the contradictory findings might be explained by the requirement for Mg2+ as a cofactor and different pH conditions affecting protein activity.

Through meticulous documentation of experimental conditions, researchers can determine whether contradictions represent true biological variation or methodological differences .

What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing plu3840 expression data?

The statistical analysis of plu3840 expression data requires careful consideration of experimental design, data distribution, and research questions. Based on statistical approaches commonly used in protein expression studies, the following methodologies are recommended:

  • For comparing expression levels across conditions:

    • For normally distributed data: ANOVA followed by post-hoc tests (Tukey's HSD)

    • For non-normally distributed data: Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's test

    • Include appropriate corrections for multiple comparisons (e.g., Bonferroni, FDR)

  • For correlation analysis between plu3840 expression and other variables:

    • Pearson correlation for normally distributed data

    • Spearman correlation for non-parametric data

    • Consider partial correlation to control for confounding variables

  • For time-course expression data:

    • Repeated measures ANOVA

    • Mixed-effects models to account for random and fixed effects

    • Time-series analysis for identifying expression patterns

  • For high-dimensional data (e.g., proteomics or transcriptomics):

    • Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction

    • Hierarchical clustering to identify co-expressed genes/proteins

    • Network analysis to identify functional relationships

  • For meta-analysis of published expression data:

    • Random or fixed effects models depending on heterogeneity assessment

    • Forest plots to visualize effect sizes across studies

    • Funnel plots to assess publication bias

What are the current hypotheses regarding the structural features of plu3840 that might inform its function?

Current research on UPF0133 family proteins suggests several structural hypotheses that might inform plu3840 function. While the specific structure of plu3840 has not been fully characterized, comparative structural biology approaches can provide valuable insights:

  • Secondary structure predictions indicate that UPF0133 family proteins typically contain a mix of α-helices and β-sheets arranged in a conserved pattern that suggests a potential binding pocket or catalytic site.

  • Conserved domains analysis reveals motifs that are shared with proteins involved in:

    • Small molecule binding

    • Nucleic acid interactions

    • Potential enzymatic activity

  • Structural homology modeling using related proteins with solved structures suggests the presence of a central core domain with flexible terminal regions that might facilitate protein-protein interactions.

  • Molecular dynamics simulations indicate potential conformational changes that could occur upon substrate binding, suggesting an induced-fit mechanism of action.

The integration of computational predictions with experimental approaches such as circular dichroism, limited proteolysis, and ultimately X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM would provide more definitive structural information to guide functional studies .

How might gene knockout or CRISPR-Cas9 approaches be optimized to study plu3840 function in P. luminescens?

Optimizing gene knockout or CRISPR-Cas9 approaches to study plu3840 function requires addressing several technical challenges specific to P. luminescens as a model organism. The following methodological framework is recommended:

  • Vector system selection:

    • Suicide vectors like pDS132 containing sacB for counter-selection

    • Temperature-sensitive plasmids for conditional knockouts

    • Inducible CRISPR-Cas9 systems to control editing timing

  • Guide RNA design for CRISPR-Cas9:

    • Target sequences with minimal off-target potential using algorithms like CHOPCHOP

    • Select PAM sites that maximize editing efficiency

    • Design multiple gRNAs targeting different regions of plu3840

  • Delivery methods:

    • Electroporation protocols optimized for P. luminescens (typically 1.8-2.5 kV, 200 Ω, 25 μF)

    • Conjugation using E. coli donors (such as S17-1 λpir)

    • Chemical transformation with extended incubation periods

  • Phenotypic analysis pipeline:

    • Growth curve analysis under various conditions (temperature, pH, nutrient limitation)

    • Transcriptomic profiling to identify compensatory responses

    • Metabolite analysis to detect changes in biochemical pathways

    • Symbiosis assays with nematode partners

    • Insect pathogenicity tests

  • Complementation strategies:

    • Trans-complementation with wild-type plu3840

    • Domain-specific complementation to identify functional regions

    • Controlled expression systems to titrate protein levels

A critical aspect of gene editing in P. luminescens is the verification of mutants through both genomic PCR and RT-qPCR to confirm the absence of target gene expression. Additionally, whole-genome sequencing of mutants can identify any off-target effects or compensatory mutations that might arise during the editing process .

What purification strategies are most effective for recombinant plu3840 protein?

Purification of recombinant plu3840 protein requires a tailored approach based on its biochemical properties and expression characteristics. The following comprehensive purification strategy is recommended based on protocols developed for similar bacterial proteins:

  • Initial purification design:

    • Affinity chromatography utilizing fusion tags (His, GST, or MBP)

    • Selection of appropriate buffer systems based on predicted pI

    • Evaluation of protein solubility in different detergent conditions if membrane association is suspected

  • Optimized purification protocol:

    Step 1: Cell lysis and clarification

    • Sonication or high-pressure homogenization in buffer containing:

      • 50 mM Tris-HCl or phosphate buffer (pH 7.5-8.0)

      • 150-300 mM NaCl

      • 5-10% glycerol as stabilizer

      • Protease inhibitor cocktail

      • Optional: 1-5 mM β-mercaptoethanol or DTT if disulfide bonds are present

    • Centrifugation at 20,000×g for 30 minutes at 4°C

    Step 2: Affinity chromatography

    • For His-tagged protein: Ni-NTA or TALON resin

    • Binding buffer: Lysis buffer with 10-20 mM imidazole

    • Wash buffer: Binding buffer with 20-50 mM imidazole

    • Elution buffer: Binding buffer with 250-500 mM imidazole

    • Flow rate: 0.5-1 ml/min for optimal binding

    Step 3: Secondary purification

    • Ion exchange chromatography (based on predicted pI)

    • Size exclusion chromatography for final polishing and buffer exchange

    • Typical buffer: 25 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol

  • Quality control assessments:

    • SDS-PAGE with Coomassie staining (>95% purity)

    • Western blotting for identity confirmation

    • Dynamic light scattering for aggregation analysis

    • Thermal shift assay for stability assessment

    • Mass spectrometry for accurate mass determination and PTM analysis

  • Yield optimization strategies:

    • Scale-up considerations for lab-scale production

    • Impact of flow rates and column dimensions on separation efficiency

    • Stability during concentration and storage conditions

For optimal results, purification should be performed at 4°C throughout the process to minimize protein degradation. If protein stability is an issue, the addition of specific cofactors or substrates might be necessary to maintain the native conformation during purification .

How can protein-protein interaction studies be designed to identify potential binding partners of plu3840?

Designing comprehensive protein-protein interaction studies for plu3840 requires a multi-technique approach to identify both stable and transient interactions. The following methodological framework provides a systematic strategy:

  • In vitro interaction assays:

    Pull-down assays

    • Immobilize purified recombinant plu3840 with different tags (His, GST, MBP)

    • Incubate with P. luminescens lysate under varying conditions:

      • Different pH values (6.0-8.0)

      • Varying salt concentrations (50-300 mM NaCl)

      • With/without potential cofactors (divalent cations, nucleotides)

    • Analyze bound proteins by mass spectrometry

    Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR)

    • Immobilize plu3840 on sensor chip

    • Flow potential interacting proteins over surface

    • Measure binding kinetics (kon, koff) and affinity (KD)

    • Test conditions mimicking physiological environment

  • Cell-based interaction studies:

    Bacterial two-hybrid system

    • Adapt bacterial two-hybrid systems for use in P. luminescens

    • Screen against genomic library to identify interaction partners

    • Validate positive hits with reciprocal constructs

    Co-immunoprecipitation

    • Express tagged versions of plu3840 in P. luminescens

    • Perform IP under native conditions

    • Identify co-precipitating proteins by mass spectrometry

    • Confirm specific interactions with targeted Western blotting

  • Proximity-based methods:

    Crosslinking mass spectrometry

    • Apply chemical crosslinkers of various spacer lengths

    • Digest crosslinked complexes

    • Identify crosslinked peptides by specialized MS/MS analysis

    • Map interaction interfaces using bioinformatics tools

    BioID or APEX2 proximity labeling

    • Create fusion proteins with biotin ligase or peroxidase

    • Express in P. luminescens under native conditions

    • Identify biotinylated proteins as proximity partners

    • Classify by functional categories and cellular compartments

  • Network analysis and validation:

    Bioinformatic prediction

    • Use interolog mapping from related species

    • Apply co-expression data to filter candidates

    • Identify conserved interaction partners across bacteria

    Functional validation

    • Perform gene knockout of identified partners

    • Assess impact on plu3840 localization, stability, or function

    • Reconstitute complexes in vitro to validate direct interactions

  • Interaction data integration:

TechniqueAdvantagesLimitationsBest For
Pull-downSimple, directMay miss weak interactionsStrong, stable complexes
SPRQuantitative kineticsRequires purified proteinsDirect binding parameters
Two-hybridIn vivo contextPotential false positivesScreening unknown partners
Co-IPNative complexesAntibody specificity issuesVerifying physiological interactions
Crosslinking-MSCaptures transient interactionsComplex data analysisMapping interaction interfaces
Proximity labelingNo need for stable interactionsSpatial resolution limitedIn vivo proximal proteins

By combining multiple approaches, researchers can build confidence in the identified interaction partners and begin to construct a functional interaction network for plu3840 .

How do homologs of plu3840 differ across bacterial species, and what might this reveal about its function?

Comparative analysis of plu3840 homologs across bacterial species provides critical insights into its evolutionary conservation and potential functional roles. Through systematic bioinformatic analysis, several patterns emerge:

Based on these patterns, plu3840 likely fulfills a conserved cellular function involved in basic bacterial physiology, potentially related to stress response or metabolic regulation. The variable regions may facilitate adaptation to specific environmental conditions encountered by different bacterial species .

What experimental evidence exists for potential roles of plu3840 in symbiosis or pathogenicity?

The experimental evidence for plu3840's potential roles in symbiosis or pathogenicity must be evaluated within the broader context of P. luminescens biology. Although direct evidence specifically addressing plu3840 is limited, several lines of investigation provide insights:

  • Expression profiling data:

    • Transcriptomic studies indicate differential regulation of UPF0133 family proteins during:

      • Transition between symbiotic and pathogenic phases

      • Insect infection process

      • Stress response conditions

    • Coordinated expression with known virulence factors suggests potential functional relationships

  • Phenotypic studies of related proteins:

    • Knockout studies of homologous proteins in related entomopathogenic bacteria show:

      • Altered biofilm formation capabilities

      • Modified production of secondary metabolites

      • Reduced virulence in insect models

      • Changes in symbiotic capacity with nematode hosts

  • Protein interaction networks:

    • Pull-down experiments with homologous proteins identify interactions with:

      • Regulatory proteins involved in quorum sensing

      • Metabolic enzymes associated with specialized metabolite production

      • Cell envelope maintenance proteins

  • Comparative genomics evidence:

    • Conservation patterns across Photorhabdus species

    • Presence in pathogenicity islands in some bacterial genomes

    • Correlation with symbiotic capacity across strains

  • Metabolic impacts:

    • Metabolomic profiling of mutant strains shows alterations in:

      • Central carbon metabolism

      • Secondary metabolite production

      • Stress response metabolites

What emerging technologies might accelerate functional characterization of plu3840?

Several cutting-edge technologies show promise for accelerating the functional characterization of plu3840 and similar uncharacterized proteins. Researchers should consider integrating these approaches into their experimental pipelines:

  • Advanced structural biology techniques:

    • Cryo-electron microscopy for high-resolution structure determination without crystallization

    • Integrative structural biology combining multiple data sources (SAXS, NMR, crosslinking-MS)

    • AlphaFold2 and similar AI-based structure prediction tools to generate testable structural hypotheses

  • High-throughput functional genomics:

    • CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for tunable gene repression under various conditions

    • Transposon sequencing (Tn-seq) to identify genetic interactions on a genome-wide scale

    • Multiplexed reporter assays to monitor expression in thousands of conditions simultaneously

  • Single-cell technologies:

    • Single-cell RNA-seq to identify cell-to-cell variability in expression

    • Time-lapse fluorescence microscopy with protein fusions to track localization dynamics

    • Microfluidic platforms for measuring single-cell responses to environmental perturbations

  • Advanced proteomics approaches:

    • Thermal proteome profiling to identify ligand interactions

    • Limited proteolysis-coupled mass spectrometry (LiP-MS) to detect conformational changes

    • Protein correlation profiling to map subcellular localization

  • Systems biology integration:

    • Multi-omics data integration frameworks

    • Machine learning approaches for function prediction from heterogeneous data

    • Network analysis tools to position plu3840 within cellular pathways

  • In situ techniques:

    • Proximity labeling adapted for bacterial systems

    • FRET-based biosensors to monitor protein interactions in living cells

    • Super-resolution microscopy to visualize protein localization at nanometer scale

The implementation of these technologies within a coordinated research program would generate complementary data streams that together could rapidly converge on a functional assignment for plu3840, potentially revealing novel biology within the Photorhabdus genus .

How can problem-based learning approaches be applied to resolve conflicting data about plu3840 function?

Problem-based learning (PBL) approaches offer a structured framework for resolving conflicting data about plu3840 function, particularly valuable in collaborative research environments and advanced training settings. The following methodology adapts PBL principles to address contradictory findings:

  • Problem identification and framing:

    • Clearly articulate the specific contradictions in plu3840 functional data

    • Map the contradictions to specific experimental variables, biological contexts, or interpretive frameworks

    • Formulate focused research questions that directly address these contradictions

  • Systematic evidence evaluation:

    • Create a structured evidence map categorizing all available data

    • Assign confidence levels to different data sources based on methodological rigor

    • Identify potential sources of experimental artifacts or misinterpretation

  • Hypothesis generation and testing cycles:

    • Develop multiple working hypotheses that could explain the contradictions

    • Design critical experiments specifically targeted to distinguish between hypotheses

    • Implement sequential experimental cycles with reflection and refinement

  • Collaborative investigation framework:

    • Establish interdisciplinary teams combining expertise in:

      • Biochemistry and structural biology

      • Molecular genetics and genomics

      • Systems biology and computational modeling

      • Microbial physiology and ecology

    • Implement structured knowledge sharing protocols

    • Develop consensus evaluation criteria for new findings

  • Integration with educational objectives:

    • Design research-based learning modules around the plu3840 contradictions

    • Engage students in authentic research through targeted sub-problems

    • Implement peer review and critical evaluation of proposed solutions

The PBL approach is particularly valuable for addressing complex biological questions like protein function determination, as it embraces the iterative nature of scientific discovery and provides structured methods for resolving seemingly contradictory data. This framework can transform the challenge of conflicting data into an opportunity for deeper mechanistic insights into plu3840 function .

What are the potential biotechnological applications of plu3840 based on current knowledge?

Based on the current understanding of UPF0133 family proteins and the biology of P. luminescens, several potential biotechnological applications for plu3840 can be envisioned, pending further functional characterization:

  • Biocontrol applications:

    • If involved in insect pathogenicity, engineered variants could enhance biopesticide efficacy

    • Potential role in optimizing symbiotic relationships with beneficial nematodes

    • Targeted modification to expand host range for agricultural pest management

  • Biocatalysis and enzyme technology:

    • If enzymatic function is confirmed, potential applications in:

      • Biocatalytic synthesis of fine chemicals

      • Environmental bioremediation

      • Biotransformation of complex substrates

  • Biosensor development:

    • Potential for creating biosensors detecting:

      • Environmental contaminants

      • Specific metabolites in industrial fermentation

      • Biomarkers in diagnostic applications

  • Protein engineering platforms:

    • Novel protein scaffolds for rational design

    • Template for developing new binding proteins

    • Structural motifs for synthetic biology applications

  • Antimicrobial development:

    • If involved in bacterial adaptation or survival, potential target for:

      • Novel antibiotic discovery

      • Anti-virulence approaches

      • Resistance modulation strategies

While these applications remain speculative until the precise function of plu3840 is elucidated, they illustrate the potential value of fundamental research on uncharacterized proteins. The history of biotechnology demonstrates that detailed understanding of protein function frequently leads to unexpected applications with significant technological and societal impact .

How should researchers approach publication of preliminary findings on plu3840 function?

Researchers investigating the function of plu3840 face unique challenges when publishing preliminary findings on uncharacterized proteins. The following guidelines provide a framework for responsible communication of early-stage functional data:

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.