Catalyzes the hydrolysis of esters.
KEGG: plu:plu1242
STRING: 243265.plu1242
Plu1242 is a UPF0255 protein found in Photorhabdus luminescens subspecies laumondii (strain DSM 15139 / CIP 105565 / TT01). Photorhabdus luminescens is a gram-negative luminescent gamma-proteobacterium that forms a symbiotic relationship with soil nematodes of the genus Heterorhabditis . This bacterium undergoes a complex life cycle involving both symbiotic and pathogenic stages. During the symbiotic stage, the bacteria colonize the intestine of nematodes, while in the pathogenic stage, they contribute to killing susceptible insects within 24-48 hours of infection . P. luminescens produces several antibiotics that prevent putrefaction of insect carcasses over several weeks, creating favorable conditions for nematode reproduction .
Multiple expression systems can be employed for the recombinant production of plu1242, each with distinct advantages:
| Expression System | Common Host Strains | Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | BL21(DE3), JM115, Rosetta-GAMI | Cost-effective, rapid growth, high yields | Potential issues with protein folding, lack of post-translational modifications |
| Yeast | SMD1168, GS115, X-33 | Post-translational modifications, secretion capability | Longer production time, glycosylation patterns differ from mammalian cells |
| Insect cells | Sf9, Sf21, Sf High Five | Complex folding, post-translational modifications | More expensive, specialized equipment needed |
| Mammalian cells | 293, 293T, NIH/3T3, COS-7, CHO | Native-like modifications, proper folding of complex proteins | Most expensive, slower growth, lower yields |
According to available data, recombinant plu1242 has been successfully expressed in E. coli systems, achieving purities of >85% as verified by SDS-PAGE . The choice of expression system should be guided by specific research requirements regarding protein quantity, quality, and downstream applications.
Researchers commonly employ modified versions of the Kirby-Bauer method to screen for antibacterial properties in P. luminescens proteins . This approach allows for the observation and determination of bactericidal properties through diffusion assays on agar plates. The basic methodological approach involves:
Culturing P. luminescens under appropriate conditions
Preparing cell-free extracts or purified protein samples
Applying these samples to agar plates inoculated with test bacteria
Measuring zones of inhibition to quantify antibacterial activity
Comparing results against appropriate controls
This screening method provides a foundation for identifying proteins with potential antibacterial properties, which can then be subjected to more detailed characterization . While direct evidence linking plu1242 specifically to antibacterial activity is not explicitly provided in the available literature, related research on P. luminescens indicates significant antibacterial potential that warrants investigation of individual proteins like plu1242.
Rigorous experimental design is crucial for accurate functional characterization of plu1242. Three fundamental design principles should guide research:
Causation: Designs must enable researchers to make causal inferences about relationships between experimental variables and protein function .
Control: Effective designs rule out alternative explanations by controlling for confounding variables .
Variability reduction: Appropriate designs minimize variability within treatment conditions, enhancing the ability to detect meaningful differences in outcomes .
Three common experimental design approaches for plu1242 characterization include:
Random assignment of experimental units to treatments
Simplest implementation but potentially less statistical power
Example: Randomly assigning bacterial cultures expressing plu1242 to different treatment conditions
Organization of experimental units into blocks based on known variables
Random assignment within blocks reduces confounding effects
Example: Blocking experiments by expression system or purification batch
Matching experimental units based on similarity, then randomly assigning treatments
Reduces variability between comparison groups
Example: Comparing wild-type and mutant plu1242 expressed under identical conditions
While direct evidence linking plu1242 to the cpm gene cluster is not explicitly established in the available literature, understanding this potential relationship requires examination of the antibiotic production mechanisms in P. luminescens:
The cpm cluster consists of eight genes (cpmA through cpmH) responsible for producing a carbapenem-like antibiotic in P. luminescens strain TT01 . This cluster exhibits several unique characteristics:
Expression is growth phase-dependent, with cpm mRNA levels peaking during exponential growth phase
Regulation involves a Rap/Hor homolog identified in the P. luminescens genome, with marker-exchange mutagenesis of this gene decreasing antibiotic production
The luxS-like quorum sensing system plays a regulatory role, with luxS responsible for repressing cpm gene expression at the end of exponential growth
Methodological approaches to investigate potential relationships between plu1242 and the cpm cluster could include:
Comparative transcriptomics to identify co-expression patterns
Protein interaction studies to detect physical associations
Genetic manipulation (knockouts, overexpression) to assess functional relationships
Metabolomic analysis to identify changes in antibiotic production profiles when plu1242 expression is altered
These investigations would provide insights into whether plu1242 participates in the regulatory network or biosynthetic processes associated with antibiotic production in P. luminescens.
Quorum sensing plays a significant role in regulating gene expression in P. luminescens, including genes involved in antibiotic production. The luxS-like signaling mechanism has been implicated in the production of a newly identified autoinducer involved in this regulatory system .
A methodological approach to study this system includes:
Bioassay using reporter strains: Cell-free P. luminescens supernatants can be tested using Vibrio harveyi BB170, which responds to autoinducers by producing light. The protocol involves:
Comparative analysis of wild-type and mutant strains:
To specifically investigate the regulation of plu1242 by quorum sensing, researchers could employ:
qPCR or RNA-seq to measure plu1242 expression levels in wild-type vs. luxS mutant strains
Time-course experiments examining expression patterns across growth phases
Addition of purified autoinducers to cultures to assess direct effects on plu1242 expression
Understanding these regulatory mechanisms could provide insights into how environmental conditions and population density influence the expression and function of plu1242.
Purification of recombinant plu1242 presents several technical challenges that require systematic methodological approaches:
A comprehensive purification workflow should include:
Pilot expression studies: Evaluate and optimize protein expression conditions
Purification method development: Identify optimal buffers and purification conditions
Scale-up: Transfer optimized conditions to larger production scale
Tag removal (if necessary): Implement site-specific protease cleavage and secondary purification
Quality control: Confirm identity, purity, and activity of the final protein product
For plu1242 specifically, successful purification has been achieved using E. coli expression systems with subsequent purification to >85% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE .
To thoroughly investigate plu1242's potential antimicrobial properties, researchers should employ methodologically sophisticated experimental approaches:
Site-directed mutagenesis targeting conserved residues
Truncation analysis to identify functional domains
Structural determination through X-ray crystallography or NMR
In silico modeling and docking studies to predict interactions with potential targets
Modified Kirby-Bauer diffusion assays against diverse microbial species
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination using standardized broth microdilution methods
Time-kill kinetics to characterize the dynamics of antimicrobial action
Combination studies with known antibiotics to identify synergistic effects
Membrane permeabilization assays (fluorescent dye uptake)
Macromolecular synthesis inhibition studies (DNA, RNA, protein, cell wall)
Transcriptomics/proteomics of target organisms exposed to plu1242
Resistance development monitoring through serial passage experiments
Comparison with other P. luminescens antimicrobial compounds
Testing activity in insect models to mimic natural environment
Investigation of potential synergy with other components of the P. luminescens secretome
Analysis of regulation in response to environmental cues