Recombinant Pichia canadensis Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (COX2)
Product Specs
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order remarks for customized preparation.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us for preferential development.
Target Background
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (COX2) is a component of cytochrome c oxidase (Complex IV), the terminal enzyme in the mitochondrial electron transport chain. This chain drives oxidative phosphorylation, involving three multi-subunit complexes: succinate dehydrogenase (Complex II), ubiquinol-cytochrome c oxidoreductase (Complex III), and cytochrome c oxidase (Complex IV). These complexes cooperate to transfer electrons from NADH and succinate to molecular oxygen, generating an electrochemical gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane. This gradient powers transmembrane transport and ATP synthase. COX2 plays a crucial role in the catalytic reduction of oxygen to water within Complex IV. Electrons from reduced cytochrome c in the intermembrane space are transferred via the CuA center of subunit 2 and heme A of subunit 1 to the active site (a binuclear center comprised of heme A3 and CuB) in subunit 1. This binuclear center utilizes four electrons from cytochrome c and four protons from the mitochondrial matrix to reduce molecular oxygen to two water molecules.
Q&A
What is Pichia canadensis Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (COX2) and its role in cellular respiration?
Pichia canadensis Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (COX2) is a critical component of complex IV (cytochrome c oxidase) in the mitochondrial electron transport chain. This protein plays an essential role in cellular respiration by facilitating electron transfer from cytochrome c to the enzyme's active site. The mature protein spans amino acids 12-247 and contains domains responsible for interaction with other respiratory complex subunits . COX2 functions as the initial electron acceptor in the oxygen reduction pathway, making it fundamentally important for oxidative phosphorylation and ATP production .
The electron transfer through COX2 follows a specific pathway:
-
Reduced cytochrome c from the intermembrane space binds to COX2
-
Electrons transfer from cytochrome c to the dinuclear copper A center (CuA) in COX2
-
Electrons then move to heme A in subunit 1
-
Finally, electrons reach the binuclear center formed by heme A3 and copper B
-
At this site, molecular oxygen is reduced to water using four electrons and four protons
This process contributes to the electrochemical gradient that ultimately drives ATP synthesis, making COX2 indispensable for aerobic energy production.
What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant Pichia canadensis COX2?
Several expression systems have been employed for recombinant production of Pichia canadensis COX2, each with distinct advantages and limitations:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Typical Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | Rapid growth, well-established protocols, high yield | Potential misfolding, limited post-translational modifications | Moderate to high |
| Wheat germ cell-free | Eukaryotic folding environment, good for membrane proteins | Higher cost, lower scalability | Low to moderate |
| Yeast systems (S. cerevisiae, P. pastoris) | Natural post-translational modifications, proper folding | Longer expression time, more complex protocols | Moderate |
The most documented approach is E. coli expression with N-terminal His-tagging for purification purposes, as evidenced in commercially available recombinant variants . For studies requiring authentic post-translational modifications and proper copper incorporation, yeast-based expression systems may provide advantages despite potentially lower yields.
When selecting an expression system, researchers should consider:
-
The intended experimental application
-
Requirements for protein activity and modifications
-
Available purification strategies
-
Scale of production needed
What are the optimal storage and handling conditions for recombinant COX2 protein?
Proper storage and handling of recombinant Pichia canadensis COX2 is critical for maintaining protein integrity and activity:
-
Working storage: Keep reconstituted aliquots at 4°C for up to one week
-
Reconstitution: Use deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
-
Cryoprotection: Add glycerol (5-50% final concentration, with 50% being commonly used) for freeze-thaw protection
-
Buffer composition: Tris/PBS-based buffer, pH 8.0 with 6% trehalose has been shown to be effective
-
Freeze-thaw cycles: Avoid repeated cycles as they significantly degrade protein structure and function
When preparing the protein for experimental use, gentle handling techniques should be employed. Brief centrifugation of vials before opening ensures all material is collected at the bottom. For functional assays, maintaining the protein in conditions that mimic the native mitochondrial environment (including appropriate pH, ionic strength, and membrane-like surroundings) can help preserve enzymatic activity.
How does oxygen availability affect COX2 expression and function in Pichia species?
Oxygen availability has profound effects on COX2 expression and function in Pichia species, given its direct involvement in oxygen utilization:
| Oxygen Condition | Effects on COX2 | Cellular Adaptations | Research Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normoxic (21% O₂) | Baseline expression levels | Standard respiratory function | Control condition for comparative studies |
| Oxygen-limiting | Transcriptional upregulation | Enhanced respiratory capacity | Potential strategy for improved protein production |
| Hypoxic (<1% O₂) | Significant gene expression changes | Metabolic rewiring, altered protein trafficking | Research opportunity for studying adaptation mechanisms |
Studies in the related species P. pastoris have shown significant transcriptional responses to hypoxia, with distinct adaptations compared to S. cerevisiae . The adaptation to reduced oxygen involves coordinated changes in lipid metabolism, stress responses, protein folding, and trafficking pathways . These adaptations appear to be integrated with recombinant protein expression mechanisms, suggesting that controlled oxygen limitation could potentially enhance protein production in biotechnological applications.
For researchers working with Pichia canadensis, understanding these oxygen-dependent responses is critical for optimizing experimental conditions and interpreting results, particularly when studying mitochondrial function or protein expression under varying oxygen tensions.
What methodological approaches are optimal for studying COX2 protein-protein interactions?
Studying protein-protein interactions involving membrane-bound proteins like COX2 requires specialized methodological approaches:
| Method | Application | Advantages | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-immunoprecipitation | Identifying native protein complexes | Preserves physiological interactions | Requires specific antibodies, appropriate detergents |
| Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation | Visualizing interactions in vivo | Detects interactions in cellular context | Protein tagging may affect function |
| Surface Plasmon Resonance | Measuring binding kinetics | Provides quantitative binding constants | Requires purified components, membrane reconstitution |
| Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange MS | Mapping interaction interfaces | High resolution of binding regions | Technically demanding, specialized equipment |
| Split-ubiquitin membrane Y2H | Screening for novel interactors | Adapted for membrane proteins | May produce false positives |
For COX2 specifically, detergent selection for extraction and solubilization significantly impacts the preservation of physiologically relevant interactions. Digitonin and mild non-ionic detergents like DDM (n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside) have been shown to better preserve respiratory complex interactions compared to more aggressive detergents.
Researchers should consider employing complementary techniques to validate interactions identified by any single method. For studying interactions with nuclear-encoded partners, such as other subunits of the cytochrome c oxidase complex, it's crucial to consider the native mitochondrial environment and potential co-translational assembly mechanisms.
What are the key considerations when designing site-directed mutagenesis experiments for COX2?
When designing site-directed mutagenesis experiments for Pichia canadensis COX2, several critical factors should be considered:
The copper-binding domains of COX2 are particularly critical targets, as they directly participate in electron transfer from cytochrome c. Previous evolutionary studies have identified codons under different selective pressures , providing valuable targets for mutagenesis. Residues under strong purifying selection (ω << 1) are likely essential for function, while those under relaxed selective constraint (ω = 1) may tolerate substitutions.
For researchers investigating structure-function relationships, a systematic approach targeting key domains—such as the copper-binding sites, transmembrane regions, and interaction interfaces with other complex IV subunits—can yield valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms of electron transfer and complex assembly.
How can researchers troubleshoot expression challenges specific to recombinant COX2?
Recombinant expression of mitochondrial membrane proteins like COX2 presents unique challenges that require systematic troubleshooting:
| Challenge | Potential Causes | Troubleshooting Strategies |
|---|---|---|
| Poor expression yield | Toxicity to host, inefficient transcription | Optimize induction conditions, use regulated promoters, test different host strains |
| Protein insolubility | Improper folding, aggregation | Modify extraction conditions, use fusion tags, express at lower temperatures |
| Lack of activity | Missing cofactors, improper folding | Co-express chaperones, supplement media with copper, ensure proper disulfide formation |
| Degradation | Protease sensitivity | Add protease inhibitors, use protease-deficient strains, optimize purification speed |
| Improper localization | Missing targeting sequences | Verify signal peptide integrity, consider adding mitochondrial targeting sequences |
For E. coli expression systems, the lack of appropriate post-translational modification machinery may limit functional expression of eukaryotic COX2 . In such cases, switching to a eukaryotic expression system might be beneficial, as it provides a more suitable environment for proper folding and modification.
Monitoring expression using western blotting with anti-His antibodies can help track protein production and stability. For functional assessment, spectroscopic methods to detect copper incorporation and electron transfer capability provide valuable information about protein quality.
What are the most reliable methods for assessing the enzymatic activity of recombinant COX2?
Assessing the enzymatic activity of recombinant COX2 requires specialized techniques focused on electron transfer capability:
| Assay Method | Measurement Parameter | Experimental Setup | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oxygen Consumption | Rate of O₂ reduction | Clark-type electrode, respirometry | Requires functional integration into complex IV |
| Cytochrome c Oxidation | Rate of cytochrome c oxidation | Spectrophotometric monitoring at 550 nm | Indirect measure of COX2 function |
| Electron Paramagnetic Resonance | CuA center redox state | EPR spectrometer, low temperature | Specialized equipment required |
| Copper Content Analysis | Copper incorporation | Atomic absorption spectroscopy | Measures cofactor presence, not activity |
It's important to note that isolated COX2 may not show full enzymatic activity without association with other subunits of the cytochrome c oxidase complex. For functional studies, reconstitution with other purified subunits or incorporation into artificial membrane systems (liposomes or nanodiscs) may be necessary.
The cytochrome c oxidation assay is particularly useful as it specifically measures the first step in the electron transfer process mediated by COX2. This assay can be performed by monitoring the decrease in absorbance at 550 nm as reduced cytochrome c becomes oxidized, providing a direct measure of electron transfer capability.
What techniques are effective for studying the evolutionary conservation of COX2?
Studying evolutionary conservation of COX2 across Pichia species and other organisms requires a multi-faceted approach:
Previous studies of COX2 in other organisms have revealed interesting evolutionary patterns. In the marine copepod Tigriopus californicus, interpopulation divergence at the COII locus reached nearly 20% at the nucleotide level, including 38 nonsynonymous substitutions . This substantial variation provides a model for understanding how this critical gene tolerates sequence divergence while maintaining function.
Analysis of selection pressure through maximum likelihood models has identified that the majority of codons in COII are under strong purifying selection (ω << 1), while approximately 4% of sites appear to evolve under relaxed selective constraint (ω = 1) . Some sites may even experience positive selection within specific lineages, suggesting adaptive evolution in response to changing environmental conditions or co-evolution with interacting proteins.
How does post-translational modification affect the functionality of COX2?
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) significantly impact COX2 functionality in multiple ways:
| Modification Type | Sites in COX2 | Functional Impact | Detection Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copper incorporation | CuA center | Essential for electron transfer | Atomic absorption spectroscopy, EPR |
| Disulfide bond formation | Conserved cysteines | Structural stability, copper binding | Non-reducing SDS-PAGE, mass spectrometry |
| Proteolytic processing | N-terminal region | Maturation and proper folding | N-terminal sequencing, mass spectrometry |
| Phosphorylation | Ser/Thr residues | Activity regulation | Phospho-specific antibodies, LC-MS/MS |
The incorporation of copper into the CuA center represents the most critical modification for COX2 function, as this directly enables electron transfer from cytochrome c. This process typically requires specialized copper chaperones in the mitochondrial intermembrane space. When expressing recombinant COX2, ensuring proper copper incorporation is a significant challenge, particularly in heterologous systems that may lack the appropriate copper delivery machinery.
Proteolytic processing is another important aspect of COX2 maturation. The protein is synthesized with an N-terminal extension that must be correctly processed for proper integration into the cytochrome c oxidase complex. In recombinant systems, this may necessitate co-expression of appropriate processing peptidases or careful design of the expression construct to include only the mature protein sequence .
