Recombinant Pichia pastoris Altered inheritance of mitochondria protein 11 (AIM11)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Overview of Recombinant Pichia pastoris Altered Inheritance of Mitochondria Protein 11 (AIM11)

Recombinant Pichia pastoris AIM11 is a heterologous protein engineered for production in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris (syn. Komagataella phaffii). It corresponds to the mitochondrial protein AIM11 (Uniprot ID: C4R7Q4), which is implicated in the regulation of mitochondrial inheritance pathways . The recombinant form is typically expressed as a partial sequence (1–199 amino acids) and purified for research or industrial applications .

Host and Expression Parameters

ParameterDetails
Host OrganismPichia pastoris (strain GS115/ATCC 20864)
Expression SystemRecombinant protein production via heterologous gene expression
Tag InformationTag type determined during production (e.g., His-tag, GST-tag)
Purity>85% by SDS-PAGE
Storage BufferTris-based buffer with 50% glycerol, optimized for stability

Key Advantages of Pichia pastoris as a Host

  • High Yield: Capable of producing recombinant proteins at titers exceeding 10 g/L under optimized bioreactor conditions .

  • Post-Translational Modifications: Supports folding and secretion pathways similar to mammalian systems, though glycosylation patterns differ (e.g., hypermannosylation) .

  • Cost-Effective: Uses methanol or alternative carbon sources (e.g., glycerol, ethanol) for induction, though methanol-free systems are emerging .

Potential Applications

FieldApplication
Basic ResearchStudying mitochondrial inheritance mechanisms in yeast models.
BiotechnologyDevelopment of tools for mitochondrial DNA manipulation or replication.
Therapeutic ResearchExploring mitochondrial dysfunction in diseases (e.g., neurodegenerative disorders).

Production Challenges

ChallengeImpact on AIM11 Production
Methanol ToxicityMethanol-induced promoters (e.g., P_AOX1) require careful bioreactor control .
Glycosylation DifferencesHypermannosylation may reduce immunogenicity or affect protein activity .
ScalabilityHigh cell density fermentation requires optimization of oxygen and nutrient supply .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder.
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notice and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, but this can be adjusted per customer requirements.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
Note: While tag type is determined during production, please inform us of any specific tag requirements; we will prioritize development accordingly.
Synonyms
AIM11; PAS_chr4_0381; Altered inheritance of mitochondria protein 11
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-199
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Komagataella phaffii (strain GS115 / ATCC 20864) (Yeast) (Pichia pastoris)
Target Names
AIM11
Target Protein Sequence
MRILLIFFVPSGILDQLFPRISILSTLRVNLTNSPLLTPNLTLYSMVNGFDFSKMFGRKD PELVSKEVKQYNERRFKQMALFYGFTVATFICSKIAYRGVIKRRYVPNYYQHNHVAPPFS FYRDALSAVFHSTSLAITSLGMASTGVLWYYDISSVAEFSFKLKQALGGHDKEQELKKLP EDETVQEIQNSINSYLGDR
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Protein Families
AIM11 family
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is AIM11 and why is it studied in Pichia pastoris expression systems?

AIM11 (Altered Inheritance of Mitochondria protein 11) is a 199-amino acid mitochondrial protein involved in mitochondrial inheritance and function. It contains characteristic hydrophobic domains and is expressed in Pichia pastoris as a model system due to P. pastoris's exceptional capacity for post-translational modifications and high protein yields. P. pastoris offers significant advantages over other expression systems, including strong folding efficiency, high cell density fermentation capabilities, and a mature secretion system for releasing proteins into the external environment via Kex2 as signal peptidase . The full amino acid sequence of AIM11 is:

MRILLIFFVPSGILDQLFPRISILSTLRVNLTNSPLLTPNLTLYSMVNGFDFSKMFGRKDPELVSKEVKQYNERRFKQMALFYGFTVATFICSKIAYRGVIKRRYVPNYYQHNHVAPPFSFYRDALSAVFHSTSLAITSLGMASTGVLWYYDISSVAEFSFKLKQALGGHDKEQELKKLPEDETVQEIQNSINSYLGDR

What are the key advantages of using Pichia pastoris for AIM11 protein expression compared to other yeast systems?

P. pastoris offers several advantages over other yeast expression systems like Saccharomyces cerevisiae when expressing proteins such as AIM11:

  • Higher protein expression levels - P. pastoris can achieve protein titers exceeding 10 g/L, equivalent to 30% of total cell proteins, driven by the AOX1 promoter

  • Superior growth characteristics - P. pastoris can grow to extremely high cell densities (>150 g dry cell weight/liter) in simple media

  • Enhanced genetic stability - P. pastoris maintains stable expression over many generations

  • Efficient secretory pathway - The limited production of endogenous secretory proteins simplifies purification of target proteins

  • More human-like post-translational modifications compared to S. cerevisiae

  • Separation of protein induction phase from cell growth phase, allowing for optimized bioprocess design

How does the selection of expression vectors impact AIM11 protein production in Pichia pastoris?

The expression vector selection significantly impacts AIM11 production efficiency in P. pastoris. Key considerations include:

  • Promoter selection: The AOX1 (alcohol oxidase) promoter is commonly used but requires methanol induction, which has drawbacks including toxicity and flammability. Alternative promoters like GAP (constitutive) or novel synthetic promoters may offer advantages for specific applications .

  • Secretion signals: The N-terminal portion of pre-pro-α-factor is commonly used but can partially lead to protein aggregation. Hybrid secretion signals incorporating S. cerevisiae Ost1 signal sequence paired with α-factor pro region (αPR) have demonstrated higher secretion efficiency for certain proteins .

  • Selection markers: Traditional markers like Zeocin resistance can be recycled using CRISPR/Cas9 geneticin plasmids. Alternative markers such as acetamidase (amdS) enable effective marker recycling through counter-selection with fluoroacetamide for multi-step genetic engineering .

  • Integration approach: Single copy vs. multi-copy integration impacts expression levels. Marker-free systems using CRISPR/Cas9 with efficient gRNA targets allow integration of multiple gene cassettes simultaneously .

What experimental approaches can optimize homologous recombination efficiency when engineering AIM11 expression strains?

Several strategies can enhance homologous recombination (HR) efficiency for AIM11 expression in P. pastoris:

What are the critical parameters for optimizing AIM11 protein folding and secretion in Pichia pastoris?

Optimizing AIM11 folding and secretion requires addressing several critical parameters:

  • ER stress management: Recombinant gene overexpression can overwhelm the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), triggering the unfolded protein response (UPR). Co-expression of chaperones and folding-assisting proteins can alleviate ER stress and improve proper protein folding .

  • Secretion pathway engineering: Manipulation of the vacuolar protein sorting (VPS) system through generation of VPS mutant strains can enhance recombinant protein secretion. The impairment of VRS is considered an effective means of improving secretion efficiency .

  • Signal sequence optimization: The selection and engineering of secretion signals significantly impacts protein export from the ER. For AIM11, hybrid signals like the S. cerevisiae Ost1 signal sequence paired with the α-factor pro region can offer superior secretion efficiency compared to standard α-factor signal sequences .

  • Metabolic monitoring: Metabolomic analysis can identify biomarkers indicating cellular stress resulting from the UPR during high expression conditions. These biomarkers can guide process optimization to minimize stress while maximizing protein production .

  • Temperature and pH optimization: Maintaining optimal temperature and pH conditions during cultivation is essential for proper protein folding and secretion. For AIM11, conditions must be experimentally determined based on protein stability and expression levels.

How can researchers effectively design a purification strategy for recombinant AIM11 protein from Pichia pastoris culture?

A comprehensive purification strategy for AIM11 should consider:

  • Affinity tag selection: His-tagging is commonly employed (as shown in the product specification) for simplified purification using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) . The position of the tag (N-terminal vs. C-terminal) may affect protein function and must be validated.

  • Expression approach selection:

    • Intracellular expression requires cell lysis and separation from cellular debris

    • Secretory expression (preferred) utilizes the P. pastoris secretory pathway to release the protein into the culture medium, simplifying downstream processing

  • Initial clarification steps:

    • Centrifugation (6,000-10,000 × g for 15-30 minutes) to remove cells

    • Filtration through 0.45 μm or 0.22 μm filters

    • Concentration using tangential flow filtration if expression levels are low

  • Chromatographic purification sequence:

    • Primary capture: IMAC for His-tagged AIM11

    • Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography based on AIM11's theoretical pI

    • Polishing: Size exclusion chromatography

  • Storage considerations: Store purified AIM11 in appropriate buffer (e.g., Tris/PBS-based buffer, pH 8.0) with 6% trehalose or 5-50% glycerol to prevent freeze-thaw damage. Aliquot and store at -20°C/-80°C for long-term storage .

What are the methodological approaches for investigating the structure-function relationship of AIM11 using Pichia pastoris expression systems?

Advanced structure-function studies of AIM11 require multiple complementary approaches:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis strategies:

    • CRISPR/Cas9-based precision editing to introduce point mutations at critical residues

    • Creation of domain deletion variants to identify functional regions

    • Alanine scanning mutagenesis of key hydrophobic regions identified in the AIM11 sequence

  • Protein structural analysis:

    • Crystallization trials with purified protein for X-ray crystallography

    • Cryo-EM studies for larger complexes involving AIM11

    • NMR spectroscopy for dynamic structural information

    • In silico structural prediction using AlphaFold2 for initial structural hypothesis generation

  • Functional correlation experiments:

    • Mitochondrial localization studies using fluorescent protein fusions

    • Mitochondrial inheritance assays in wild-type vs. AIM11 mutant strains

    • Protein-protein interaction studies using:

      • Co-immunoprecipitation

      • Yeast two-hybrid screening

      • BioID or APEX2 proximity labeling

      • Crosslinking mass spectrometry

  • Biophysical characterization:

    • Circular dichroism spectroscopy to analyze secondary structure components

    • Differential scanning calorimetry to assess thermal stability

    • Isothermal titration calorimetry for binding interactions

    • Surface plasmon resonance for kinetic binding studies

How can researchers optimize multi-copy integration of AIM11 expression cassettes in Pichia pastoris without compromising cellular fitness?

Balancing high expression with cellular fitness requires sophisticated approaches:

  • Integration site selection strategies:

    • Use of high efficient sites with 100 bp range of upstream promoter and downstream terminator enables integration of multiple gene cassettes simultaneously

    • Targeting non-essential genomic loci to minimize fitness impact

    • Implementation of characterized "safe harbor" integration sites

  • Copy number optimization:

    • Development of a screening system using flow cytometry with fluorescent reporters to identify optimal copy number

    • qPCR-based quantification of integration events correlated with expression levels and growth characteristics

    • Implementation of inducible promoter systems allowing fine-tuning of expression levels

  • Metabolic burden assessment:

    • Metabolomic analysis to identify bottlenecks and metabolic imbalances

    • Transcriptomic analysis to evaluate cellular stress responses

    • Growth rate and recombinant protein productivity measurements in various carbon sources

    • Mitochondrial function assays given AIM11's role in mitochondrial processes

  • Genetic stability enhancement:

    • Codon optimization to reduce ribosomal load

    • Balancing of copy number with cellular capacity

    • Application of antibiotic-free selection systems to maintain selective pressure during scale-up

    • Long-term cultivation stability studies with periodic verification of cassette integrity

What strategies can address protein misfolding and ER stress when expressing complex mitochondrial proteins like AIM11 in Pichia pastoris?

Advanced approaches to mitigate ER stress include:

  • Engineered chaperone networks:

    • Co-expression of specific chaperones (BiP, PDI, calnexin) under controlled promoters

    • Implementation of engineered UPR elements to preemptively activate folding machinery

    • Screening of chaperone combinations for synergistic effects on AIM11 folding

  • Cultivation process optimization:

    • Temperature-shift protocols (lowering temperature during induction phase)

    • Feed rate modulation in bioreactor cultivations to balance growth with protein production

    • Addition of chemical chaperones (e.g., DMSO, glycerol, betaine) to culture medium

    • Controlled dissolved oxygen levels to support mitochondrial function

  • Protein engineering approaches:

    • Domain-by-domain expression to identify problematic regions

    • Creation of fusion constructs with highly soluble partners

    • Implementation of split-intein systems for separate expression and subsequent protein splicing

    • Directed evolution of AIM11 variants with improved folding properties

  • Monitoring and responsive systems:

    • Real-time monitoring of UPR activation using reporter constructs

    • Implementation of feedback-controlled expression systems responding to cellular stress levels

    • Integration of metabolomic data with transcriptomic profiles to identify optimal expression windows

    • Development of mathematical models predicting optimal induction timing based on cellular state

What experimental design considerations are important when using AIM11 as a model protein for studying mitochondrial inheritance mechanisms?

Key experimental design considerations include:

  • Control selection:

    • Wild-type AIM11 expression as positive control

    • Empty vector transformants as negative controls

    • AIM11 knockout strains for loss-of-function studies

    • Domain-specific mutants for structure-function analysis

  • Visualization strategies:

    • Fluorescent protein tagging (considering tag position effects)

    • Immunofluorescence with validated antibodies

    • Live cell imaging compatible with mitochondrial dyes

    • Super-resolution microscopy for detailed localization studies

  • Functional assays:

    • Mitochondrial morphology analysis before and after cell division

    • Quantitative assessment of mitochondrial inheritance patterns

    • Mitochondrial membrane potential measurements

    • Respiratory capacity evaluations using oxygen consumption rates

  • Interaction studies:

    • Identification of AIM11 binding partners in mitochondrial membranes

    • Characterization of protein complexes involving AIM11

    • Analysis of AIM11 dynamics during cell cycle progression

    • Evaluation of AIM11 response to cellular stressors

How can researchers design experiments to resolve contradictory data about AIM11 function using Pichia pastoris expression systems?

Resolving contradictory data requires systematic experimental approaches:

  • Source variation assessment:

    • Expression of AIM11 from different species/strains to identify conserved functions

    • Comparative analysis of sequence variations and their functional implications

    • Creation of chimeric proteins to isolate functional domains

  • Conditional expression systems:

    • Implementation of regulatable promoters to control expression timing and levels

    • Temperature-sensitive mutants to allow rapid function modulation

    • Anchor-away or degron systems for controlled protein depletion

  • Comprehensive phenotypic analysis:

    • High-throughput screening under various growth conditions

    • Metabolomic profiling to identify subtle phenotypic differences

    • Transcriptomic analysis to detect compensatory mechanisms

    • Systematic genetic interaction mapping (synthetic lethality/rescue screens)

  • Experimental validation approach:

    • Independent validation by multiple research groups

    • Use of different methodological approaches to test the same hypothesis

    • Careful control of experimental variables that might explain discrepancies

    • Meta-analysis of published data to identify patterns in contradictory results

What are the methodological considerations for scaling up AIM11 protein production for structural biology applications?

Scaling up AIM11 production requires addressing:

  • Expression optimization:

    • Selection between batch, fed-batch, and continuous cultivation strategies

    • Design of feeding strategies to maintain optimal growth conditions

    • Implementation of DO-stat or pH-stat control for process consistency

    • Development of defined media formulations to reduce batch-to-batch variation

  • Bioreactor parameters:

    • Optimization of dissolved oxygen levels (30-50%)

    • pH control strategies (typically pH 5.0-6.0)

    • Temperature control (typically 28-30°C during growth, potentially lowered to 20-25°C during induction)

    • Agitation and aeration rates to prevent oxygen limitation while minimizing shear stress

  • Induction strategy:

    • For methanol-inducible promoters, development of methanol feeding strategies:

      • Dissolved oxygen spike method

      • Programmed feeding based on predicted consumption

      • Sensor-based adaptive control

    • Optimizing induction timing based on biomass concentration

  • Purification scale-up considerations:

    • Implementation of expanded bed adsorption for direct capture from high-density cultures

    • Development of continuous chromatography processes

    • Scale-up of buffer systems and optimization of elution conditions

    • Implementation of high-throughput screening for crystallization conditions

Troubleshooting and Optimization

A systematic optimization approach includes:

  • sgRNA design optimization:

    • Implementation of computational tools to design highly specific sgRNAs

    • Experimental validation of sgRNA efficiency using reporter systems

    • Testing multiple sgRNAs targeting different regions of the AIM11 gene

    • Optimization of sgRNA expression using appropriate RNA polymerase III promoters

  • Cas9 expression optimization:

    • Selection between transient and stable Cas9 expression

    • Use of codon-optimized Cas9 variants for P. pastoris

    • Implementation of inducible promoters for controlled Cas9 expression

    • Optimization of nuclear localization signals for efficient nuclear targeting

  • Delivery method optimization:

    • Comparison of electroporation, chemical transformation, and biolistic methods

    • Optimization of DNA concentration and repair template design

    • Testing of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) delivery to avoid genomic integration of Cas9

    • Implementation of carrier DNA to improve transformation efficiency

  • Repair pathway manipulation:

    • Transient inhibition of NHEJ proteins during transformation

    • Enhanced expression of HR machinery components (e.g., RAD52)

    • Cell cycle synchronization to S/G2 phase using hydroxyurea

    • Design of repair templates with optimized homology arm length

What analytical methods should researchers employ to verify proper folding and function of recombinant AIM11 protein?

Comprehensive analytical validation includes:

  • Structural integrity assessment:

    • Circular dichroism spectroscopy to analyze secondary structure content

    • Intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy to assess tertiary structure

    • Size exclusion chromatography to verify monodispersity

    • Differential scanning calorimetry to determine thermal stability

    • Limited proteolysis to probe for properly folded domains

  • Functional verification:

    • Mitochondrial binding assays using isolated mitochondria

    • Lipid interaction studies (if membrane association is expected)

    • ATPase activity assays (if applicable)

    • Protein-protein interaction studies with known binding partners

    • Complementation assays in AIM11-deficient yeast strains

  • Post-translational modification analysis:

    • Mass spectrometry to identify and quantify modifications

    • Western blot with modification-specific antibodies

    • Glycan analysis using lectin binding or specialized chromatography

    • Phosphorylation site mapping using phospho-specific antibodies

  • Localization studies:

    • Subcellular fractionation followed by Western blot analysis

    • Immunofluorescence microscopy to verify mitochondrial targeting

    • Electron microscopy with immunogold labeling for precise localization

    • In vitro mitochondrial import assays to verify targeting sequences functionality

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.