KEGG: pto:PTO0545
STRING: 263820.PTO0545
Picrophilus torridus is an extreme thermoacidophilic archaeon that thrives in extraordinarily harsh conditions. This organism is remarkable for its ability to grow at pH values as low as 0.7 and at temperatures around 55°C, making it one of the most acidophilic organisms known . The complete genome sequence of P. torridus has been determined to be 1,545,900 base pairs in length with a G+C content of 36% . The organism contains 1,535 open reading frames (ORFs), of which 983 have been assigned functions based on sequence homology . This extremophile offers unique opportunities to study adaptations to extreme environments and provides a source of thermostable and acid-stable enzymes with potential biotechnological applications.
P. torridus is typically cultured at 55°C under aerobic conditions in specialized acidic media . The organism has a relatively slow growth rate compared to many bacteria, with cells typically harvested during late log phase . The table below summarizes the key growth parameters for P. torridus:
For the expression of recombinant P. torridus proteins, including lipB1 (probable octanoyltransferase 1), Escherichia coli-based expression systems have been successfully employed. Based on protocols used for other P. torridus proteins, the following approach is recommended:
The gene encoding lipB1 should first be synthesized with codon optimization for E. coli expression, potentially using a commercial synthesis service . The synthetic gene should include appropriate restriction sites (such as NheI and SalI) for subsequent cloning into a suitable expression vector, such as pET28a(+), which provides an N-terminal histidine tag for purification . The construct should be transformed initially into E. coli DH5α for plasmid propagation and verification before transformation into an expression strain such as E. coli BL21(DE3) .
Expression can be induced in LB medium containing appropriate antibiotics (e.g., 50 μg/ml kanamycin) when cultures reach an optical density (A600) of approximately 0.6, using 1 mM IPTG . After induction, cells should be incubated for an additional 4 hours at 37°C before harvesting by centrifugation at 8,000 × g .
Purification of recombinant P. torridus proteins can be achieved using affinity chromatography followed by size exclusion chromatography. Based on protocols for other P. torridus proteins, the following purification strategy should be effective for lipB1:
Cell lysis: Resuspend harvested cells in an appropriate buffer (e.g., 1X PBS, pH 7.2) and disrupt by sonication for approximately 30 minutes with intermittent pulses to prevent protein denaturation due to heating .
Initial clarification: Remove cell debris by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 30 minutes at 4°C .
Affinity chromatography: Filter the supernatant through a 0.22-μm membrane and apply to a metal affinity column (such as Co²⁺-NTA beads) pre-equilibrated with the same buffer . Wash the column extensively with equilibration buffer followed by wash buffer containing a low concentration of imidazole (approximately 20 mM) to remove non-specifically bound proteins . Elute the target protein with buffer containing 200 mM imidazole .
Dialysis: Remove imidazole by dialyzing the eluted protein against an appropriate buffer overnight .
Size exclusion chromatography: For higher purity, perform size exclusion chromatography using a suitable column (such as HiPrep S-200 HR) .
Quality assessment: Verify protein purity using SDS-PAGE and confirm identity by mass spectrometry techniques such as MALDI-TOF .
The oligomeric state of recombinant P. torridus proteins can be determined using a combination of techniques. Based on approaches used for other P. torridus proteins, the following methods are recommended for lipB1:
Size exclusion chromatography (SEC): Run the purified protein on a calibrated SEC column and compare the elution volume with those of protein standards of known molecular weight . This method provides an estimate of the native molecular weight and can indicate whether the protein exists as a monomer, dimer, or higher oligomer under native conditions.
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: This technique can reveal the presence of different oligomeric species in the protein preparation. For example, analysis of P. torridus NAC protein showed two peaks corresponding to monomeric (14.5 kDa) and dimeric (29.0 kDa) forms of the protein .
Native PAGE: Unlike SDS-PAGE, which denatures proteins, native PAGE maintains the native structure and can be used to visualize different oligomeric forms.
Analytical ultracentrifugation: This technique provides accurate determination of molecular weight and can distinguish between different oligomeric species in solution.
Dynamic light scattering (DLS): This method estimates the hydrodynamic radius of particles in solution and can provide information about the size distribution of protein complexes.
An integrated approach using multiple techniques is recommended for the most reliable assessment of oligomeric state, as each method has its own limitations and strengths.
Given that P. torridus is an extreme thermoacidophile, its proteins, including lipB1, are expected to exhibit remarkable stability under harsh conditions. The following methods are recommended for characterizing the thermostability and acid stability of recombinant lipB1:
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC): This technique measures the heat capacity of a protein as a function of temperature, providing direct measurement of thermal transitions and allowing determination of the melting temperature (Tm).
Circular Dichroism (CD) spectroscopy: By monitoring changes in the CD spectrum at increasing temperatures or at different pH values, the structural stability of the protein can be assessed. The temperature or pH at which 50% of the protein unfolds (T50 or pH50) can be determined.
Enzymatic activity assays at different temperatures and pH values: By measuring the catalytic activity of lipB1 across a range of temperatures and pH values, the optimal conditions and stability range can be determined.
Thermal shift assays: These fluorescence-based assays use dyes that bind to hydrophobic regions exposed during protein unfolding, allowing for high-throughput screening of stability conditions.
Limited proteolysis: Incubation with proteases at different temperatures or pH values, followed by SDS-PAGE analysis, can provide insights into structural changes and stability.
Protein aggregation assays: Techniques such as dynamic light scattering or turbidity measurements can assess protein aggregation under different conditions.
When characterizing proteins from extremophiles like P. torridus, it's important to include appropriate controls and to consider that conventional stability assays may need to be adapted to accommodate the extreme conditions in which these proteins naturally function.
Determining the substrate specificity of lipB1 (probable octanoyltransferase) requires a systematic approach to testing various potential substrates. The following methods are recommended:
In vitro enzymatic assays: Set up reactions containing purified lipB1, potential acyl donor substrates (such as octanoyl-CoA, other acyl-CoAs of varying chain lengths), and potential acyl acceptor substrates (such as lipoyl domains from various proteins). Monitor the transfer of the acyl group using techniques such as:
HPLC or LC-MS to detect modified products
Radioactive assays using labeled substrates
Coupled enzymatic assays that produce a detectable signal when the reaction occurs
Substrate competition assays: When multiple substrates are found to be utilized, competition assays can determine relative preferences by measuring reaction rates when multiple substrates are present simultaneously.
Kinetic analysis: Determine kinetic parameters (Km, kcat, kcat/Km) for different substrates to quantitatively assess substrate preference.
Structural studies: Computational modeling or experimental structure determination (X-ray crystallography, cryo-EM) with bound substrates or substrate analogs can provide insights into the structural basis of substrate recognition.
Site-directed mutagenesis: Modify putative substrate-binding residues and assess changes in substrate specificity to identify key residues involved in substrate recognition.
Given the thermoacidophilic nature of P. torridus, these assays should be optimized to account for the enzyme's potential preference for extreme conditions (high temperature, low pH) that might affect substrate binding and catalysis.
Understanding the interaction partners of lipB1 in P. torridus can provide valuable insights into its biological function and regulatory mechanisms. Based on methods used for other P. torridus proteins, the following approaches are recommended:
Pull-down assays: Immobilize purified His-tagged lipB1 on affinity beads (such as Co²⁺-NTA Agarose) and incubate with P. torridus cell lysate . After washing to remove non-specifically bound proteins, elute the complexes and identify interacting partners using mass spectrometry .
Yeast two-hybrid screening: Using lipB1 as bait, screen a P. torridus genomic library to identify potential interacting partners. Although this is performed in a heterologous system, it can provide candidates for further validation.
Co-immunoprecipitation: Generate antibodies against lipB1 and use them to immunoprecipitate the protein along with its interaction partners from P. torridus lysates.
Crosslinking mass spectrometry: Use chemical crosslinkers to stabilize transient protein-protein interactions in vivo or in vitro, followed by mass spectrometry analysis to identify crosslinked peptides.
Bacterial/archaeal two-hybrid systems: These are adaptations of the yeast two-hybrid approach that may be more suitable for prokaryotic proteins.
Protein microarrays: If available, P. torridus protein arrays could be probed with labeled lipB1 to identify binding partners.
Bioinformatic prediction: Use computational approaches to predict potential interaction partners based on genomic context, co-expression data, or structural modeling.
When identifying protein-protein interactions, it's important to validate findings using multiple approaches and to consider the physiological relevance of the interactions within the context of P. torridus biology.
Crystallizing proteins from extremophiles like P. torridus presents unique challenges but also opportunities. The following challenges and strategies should be considered for lipB1 crystallization:
Challenges:
Proteins from thermoacidophiles often require special buffer conditions that may not be compatible with common crystallization screens.
These proteins may adopt different conformations at room temperature compared to their native high-temperature environment.
Surface charges and hydrophobicity may differ from mesophilic proteins, affecting crystal contacts.
Potential post-translational modifications specific to archaea might affect homogeneity.
Strategies:
Screen crystallization conditions at different pH values, including acidic conditions that might better reflect the protein's native environment.
Include temperature as a variable in crystallization trials, potentially setting up parallel screens at room temperature and elevated temperatures.
Consider the addition of ligands or substrates to stabilize the protein in a specific conformation.
Use surface entropy reduction (SER) approaches, where surface residues with high conformational entropy are mutated to alanine to promote crystal contacts.
Try various constructs with different N- or C-terminal boundaries, as flexible termini can hinder crystallization.
Consider alternative crystallization methods such as lipidic cubic phase (LCP) for membrane-associated proteins.
Use reductive methylation of surface lysines or limited proteolysis to potentially improve crystallization properties.
Explore crystallization in the presence of archaeal-specific lipids or membrane components that might stabilize the protein.
The inherent stability of thermoacidophilic proteins can be advantageous for crystallization, as they often remain stable for extended periods and may be less prone to degradation during the crystallization process.
In the absence of an experimental structure, computational modeling can provide valuable insights into the structure and function of P. torridus lipB1. The following approaches are recommended:
Homology modeling: Identify homologous proteins with known structures using sequence alignment tools such as BLAST or HHpred. Use these templates to build a 3D model of lipB1 using software such as MODELLER, Swiss-Model, or Rosetta.
Threading/fold recognition: When sequence homology is low, threading approaches that compare the target sequence with known protein folds can identify distant structural relationships.
Ab initio modeling: For domains or regions with no detectable homology to known structures, ab initio approaches like Rosetta or AlphaFold can be used to predict structure based on physicochemical principles.
Molecular dynamics simulations: Once a structural model is obtained, MD simulations can refine the model and provide insights into flexibility, stability at high temperatures and low pH, and potential conformational changes.
Substrate docking: Computational docking of potential substrates (such as acyl-CoA derivatives) can predict binding modes and substrate preferences.
Virtual screening: If the active site can be identified, virtual screening of compound libraries can identify potential inhibitors or activators.
Electrostatic surface analysis: Given the acidic environment of P. torridus, analyzing the electrostatic surface of the protein can provide insights into how it functions at low pH.
Coevolution analysis: Methods such as direct coupling analysis (DCA) can identify co-evolving residues, which often correspond to physically interacting regions in the protein.
Protein-protein interaction prediction: Tools like HADDOCK or ZDOCK can model potential interactions with other proteins identified in experimental studies.
It's important to validate computational models where possible, such as by testing predictions experimentally through site-directed mutagenesis of predicted catalytic or substrate-binding residues.
The extreme environment in which P. torridus thrives likely has profound effects on the function and regulation of its proteins, including lipB1. Several important considerations include:
pH adaptation: P. torridus maintains an intracellular pH that is much higher than its external environment, but still more acidic than most organisms . This pH gradient may influence enzyme regulation, with lipB1 potentially having evolved specific mechanisms to function optimally in this moderately acidic intracellular environment.
Temperature effects: As a thermophile growing at approximately 55°C , the thermal energy available in the P. torridus cellular environment will affect protein dynamics and enzyme kinetics. LipB1 likely has structural adaptations that optimize its function at elevated temperatures, potentially including increased hydrophobic interactions, additional salt bridges, or disulfide bonds.
Membrane association: If lipB1 interacts with or is associated with cellular membranes, the unique archaeal membrane lipids of P. torridus (including tetraether lipids that form monolayers rather than bilayers) may influence its localization and function . These lipids are known to change in abundance and composition in response to environmental conditions .
Metabolic context: The central metabolism of P. torridus involves pathways that may differ from those in model organisms, potentially affecting the regulatory context in which lipB1 functions. For example, P. torridus possesses unusual amino acid degradation pathways and a high ratio of secondary to primary solute transport systems .
Protein-protein interactions: The extreme environment may lead to unique protein-protein interactions that regulate lipB1 activity. Identifying these interaction partners using methods such as those described in question 4.2 can provide insights into regulation mechanisms.
Post-translational modifications: Archaea may employ different post-translational modifications than bacteria or eukaryotes, which could be involved in regulating lipB1 activity in response to environmental conditions.
Understanding these factors requires integrated approaches that combine biochemical characterization of the isolated enzyme with in vivo studies of P. torridus under various growth conditions.
Studying the evolutionary adaptations of lipB1 requires a comparative approach that examines homologous proteins across diverse organisms. The following strategies are recommended:
Phylogenetic analysis: Construct phylogenetic trees of lipB1 homologs from various species, including extremophiles and mesophiles. This can identify lineage-specific adaptations and potential horizontal gene transfer events.
Comparative sequence analysis: Identify conserved and variable regions across homologs, with particular attention to differences between proteins from extremophiles and mesophiles. Tools like ConSurf can map conservation onto structural models to identify functionally important residues.
Ancestral sequence reconstruction: Infer the sequences of ancestral lipB1 proteins and experimentally characterize them to understand the evolutionary trajectory of adaptations to extreme conditions.
Comparative structural analysis: Compare the structural features of lipB1 from P. torridus with homologs from organisms living in moderate conditions to identify potential adaptations such as:
Increased surface charge (especially negative charges) to maintain solubility at low pH
Enhanced hydrophobic core packing for thermostability
Additional electrostatic interactions (salt bridges) or metal binding sites
Modified active site architecture to accommodate function at extreme pH
Laboratory evolution: Subject lipB1 to directed evolution under various selective pressures to understand its evolutionary plasticity and the molecular mechanisms of adaptation.
Heterologous expression studies: Express lipB1 homologs from different organisms in P. torridus (if possible) or vice versa to assess functional conservation and the importance of the cellular environment.
Genomic context analysis: Compare the genomic neighborhood of lipB1 across species to identify potential co-evolution with functionally related genes.
Molecular dynamics simulations: Compare the dynamics of lipB1 and its homologs under different temperature and pH conditions to identify molecular mechanisms of adaptation.
These approaches, used in combination, can provide a comprehensive understanding of how lipB1 has evolved to function in the extreme environment of P. torridus and the molecular basis of its adaptations.
Designing assays for enzymes from extreme thermoacidophiles like P. torridus requires careful consideration of their unique properties. The following recommendations should be considered when working with lipB1:
Temperature optimization: Assays should be performed at temperatures that reflect the organism's growth conditions (approximately 55°C for P. torridus) . This may require specialized equipment such as thermostated spectrophotometers or heated reaction blocks.
pH considerations: While P. torridus grows at extremely low external pH, its intracellular pH is likely moderately acidic rather than extremely acidic . Assays should explore a range of pH values to determine the optimal conditions for lipB1 activity.
Buffer stability: At high temperatures and extreme pH, many common buffers may degrade or lose their buffering capacity. Select thermostable buffers that maintain pH effectively under the assay conditions.
Reference controls: Include appropriate controls, such as heat-inactivated enzyme or reactions with enzymes from mesophilic organisms, to confirm that observed activity is specific to the thermoacidophilic enzyme.
Substrate stability: Ensure that substrates are stable under the assay conditions. Some substrates may degrade rapidly at high temperatures or extreme pH, leading to false negative results.
Enzyme stability: While enzymes from thermoacidophiles are generally stable, they may still lose activity during prolonged storage. Optimize storage conditions and include freshly prepared enzyme in critical experiments.
Detection methods: Choose detection methods that are compatible with high temperatures and extreme pH. For example, some fluorescent dyes or chromogenic substrates may be unstable under these conditions.
Kinetic considerations: Reaction rates may be much faster at elevated temperatures, requiring adjustments to sampling times and enzyme concentrations compared to standard assays with mesophilic enzymes.
Equipment compatibility: Ensure that all equipment (reaction vessels, plate readers, etc.) is compatible with the extreme conditions required for the assay.
By carefully addressing these considerations, it is possible to develop robust and reliable assays for lipB1 that accurately reflect its activity under conditions relevant to its native environment.
Optimizing heterologous expression of P. torridus lipB1 in E. coli or other host organisms requires addressing several challenges specific to proteins from thermoacidophilic archaea. The following strategies are recommended:
Codon optimization: The codon usage in P. torridus differs significantly from that in E. coli. Having the lipB1 gene synthesized with codons optimized for E. coli can improve expression levels .
Expression vector selection: Test multiple expression vectors with different promoters, fusion tags, and regulatory elements. For archaeal proteins, vectors with tight regulation of expression (such as pET series) often work well .
Fusion partners: Consider using solubility-enhancing fusion partners such as SUMO, MBP, or Thioredoxin, which can improve folding and solubility of the recombinant protein.
Host strain selection: Different E. coli strains have different properties that may affect expression:
Induction conditions: Optimize:
Media composition: Rich media like TB or 2xYT often yield more protein than LB. Supplementation with specific cofactors or metal ions may improve folding and activity.
Co-expression strategies: Consider co-expressing molecular chaperones (such as GroEL/GroES) or archaeal-specific factors that might assist in proper folding.
Purification optimization:
Test different affinity tags (His6, Strep-tag, FLAG)
Optimize buffer conditions (pH, salt concentration, addition of stabilizers)
Include protease inhibitors during lysis to prevent degradation
Consider on-column refolding for proteins that form inclusion bodies
Alternative expression systems: If E. coli expression is challenging, consider:
Yeast systems (Pichia pastoris, Saccharomyces cerevisiae)
Insect cell expression
Cell-free protein synthesis
Extremophilic expression hosts
Protein refolding: If the protein forms inclusion bodies, develop a refolding protocol by testing various refolding buffers and methods (dilution, dialysis, on-column refolding).
Systematic optimization of these parameters, potentially using a factorial experimental design approach, can significantly improve the yield and activity of recombinant P. torridus lipB1.
Enzymes from extreme thermoacidophiles like P. torridus have unique properties that make them valuable for various biotechnological applications. For lipB1 specifically, potential applications include:
Biocatalysis in harsh conditions: The ability to function at high temperatures and low pH makes lipB1 potentially useful for industrial processes requiring these conditions, such as certain biofuel production methods or chemical synthesis reactions where acidic conditions are advantageous.
Protein lipoylation: If lipB1 functions as predicted to transfer octanoyl groups to target proteins (as part of the lipoic acid biosynthesis pathway), it could be used for in vitro protein modification, allowing site-specific attachment of various functional groups to target proteins.
Thermostable biosensors: Engineered variants of lipB1 could potentially be developed into biosensors for detecting specific metabolites, with the advantage of stability under harsh conditions.
Industrial enzyme cascades: Thermostable enzymes are valuable components in multi-enzyme reaction systems, where their stability allows for process simplification and reduced enzyme replacement costs.
Structure-based enzyme engineering: Understanding the structural basis of lipB1's thermoacidophilic adaptations could inform the engineering of other enzymes to increase their stability under extreme conditions.
The extreme stability of thermoacidophilic enzymes generally offers advantages such as longer shelf life, resistance to denaturing agents, and the ability to withstand harsh process conditions, making them valuable starting points for enzyme engineering and industrial applications.
Despite the availability of the P. torridus genome sequence and studies on some aspects of its biology, several significant knowledge gaps remain that future research should address: