Recombinant Pongo abelii DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 14 (DNAJB14) refers to a recombinant protein derived from the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii). DNAJB14 is part of the DnaJ heat shock protein family, which plays a crucial role in protein folding and degradation processes within cells. This protein is particularly significant in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) and acts as a co-chaperone for Hsc70/Hsp70 heat shock proteins .
DNAJB14 is a type II transmembrane protein located in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). It functions by facilitating the proper folding of proteins and aiding in the degradation of misfolded proteins through ERAD. This process is essential for maintaining cellular homeostasis and preventing the accumulation of toxic protein aggregates .
Protein Folding and Quality Control: DNAJB14 assists in the folding of newly synthesized proteins and helps eliminate misfolded proteins from the ER.
Co-chaperone Activity: It acts as a co-chaperone for Hsc70/Hsp70, enhancing their ATPase activity and facilitating protein folding.
Viral Infection: DNAJB14 is crucial for the infection process of certain viruses, such as simian virus 40 (SV40), by facilitating viral capsid disassembly and nuclear entry .
Recent studies have highlighted the importance of DNAJB14 in various cellular processes:
The recombinant Pongo abelii DNAJB14 protein is produced using advanced biotechnology techniques. This involves cloning the DNAJB14 gene into an expression vector, followed by transformation into a suitable host organism where the protein is expressed and purified.
Recombinant DNAJB14 proteins can be used in various research applications, including studies on protein folding, ER stress, and viral infection mechanisms. Additionally, they may serve as tools for understanding evolutionary conserved functions across different species.
Basic Research: Investigating protein folding mechanisms and ERAD pathways.
Virology: Studying viral infection processes and developing antiviral strategies.
Biotechnology: Developing novel therapeutic proteins or diagnostic tools.
Recombinant Pongo abelii DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 14 (DNAJB14) functions as a co-chaperone with HSPA8/Hsc70. It plays a crucial role in protein folding and trafficking, preventing aggregation of client proteins, and directing misfolded proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) pathway. DNAJB14 modulates HSPA8/Hsc70's ATPase and polypeptide-binding activities. It also exhibits HSPA8/Hsc70-independent activity, working with DNAJB12 to chaperone the maturation of potassium channels KCND2 and KCNH2. This involves stabilizing nascent channel subunits and facilitating their assembly into tetramers. While HSPA8/Hsc70 is essential for stabilizing nascent channel proteins, the oligomerization process is independent of HSPA8/Hsc70. Overexpression of DNAJB14, in conjunction with DNAJB12 and HSPA8/Hsc70, results in the formation of nuclear membranous structures termed DJANGOs, whose function remains to be fully elucidated.
DNAJB14 is a type II transmembrane protein localized in the endoplasmic reticulum. The protein contains a J-domain with four α-helices (helix I, helix II, helix III, and helix IV) and a conserved HPD (His, Pro, and Asp) tripeptide located between helix II and helix III . Structural analysis reveals that DNAJB14 from Pongo abelii (Sumatran orangutan) contains a transmembrane domain located at amino acids 172-194, which anchors the protein to the ER membrane . The J-domain is highly conserved across species, showing greater homology to those of other animals than other protein regions . The protein's complete amino acid sequence includes 379 residues with the cytoplasmic J-domain positioned on the cytoplasmic face of the ER membrane .
DNAJB14 serves as a co-chaperone for Hsc70/Hsp70 heat shock proteins through its J-domain, which increases the folding activity of these catalytically active chaperones . The conserved HPD tripeptide in the J-domain is critical for this function, as it mediates the interaction with Hsc70/Hsp70 and stimulates their ATPase activity . As a type II transmembrane protein, DNAJB14 positions its J-domain on the cytoplasmic face of the ER membrane, allowing it to recruit cytosolic Hsc70 to the ER surface . This arrangement enables DNAJB14 to participate in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD), a quality control mechanism in which improperly folded proteins in the ER lumen or membrane are extracted and degraded in the cytoplasm .
DJANGOS (as named by researchers) are elaborate intranuclear membranous structures that form when DNAJB14 or its related protein DNAJB12 are overexpressed . These structures appear as numerous punctate formations within cell nuclei that stain intensely for both the overexpressed DNAJ proteins and endogenous Hsc70 . Genetic experiments have revealed that DJANGOS formation requires:
A functional J-domain in DNAJB14/DNAJB12
The presence of Hsc70
The expression of DNAJB12 (DNAJB14 overexpression cannot induce DJANGOS in DNAJB12 knockdown cells)
These structures emerge from a novel configuration of membranes in proximity to atypical nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) and represent a dramatic remodeling of membranes associated with a subset of nuclear pores . DJANGOS appear to form coordinately in individual nuclei and disappear synchronously during cell division, suggesting a regulated process rather than random membrane invasion .
DNAJB14 plays crucial roles in cellular stress responses, particularly in antioxidant defense mechanisms. Experimental data from Apis cerana cerana shows that DNAJB14 expression is differentially regulated under various stress conditions, including:
| Stress Type | Effect on DNAJB14 Expression | Timeframe of Significant Change |
|---|---|---|
| Cold stress | Upregulation | 1-3 hours after exposure |
| UV radiation | Downregulation | 1-3 hours after exposure |
| Abamectin exposure | Significant upregulation | 24 hours after exposure |
| Imidacloprid exposure | Moderate upregulation | 24 hours after exposure |
| Cypermethrin exposure | Slight upregulation | 24 hours after exposure |
Knockdown experiments revealed that silencing DNAJB14 affects antioxidant enzyme activities and oxidative stress markers :
Decreased enzymatic activities of catalase (CAT), glutathione S-transferase (GST), and superoxide dismutase (SOD)
Increased malondialdehyde (MDA) and protein carbonyl content (indicators of oxidative damage)
These findings demonstrate that DNAJB14 is an integral component of cellular stress response pathways, particularly in managing oxidative stress .
DNAJB14 influences the expression of numerous antioxidant genes, highlighting its role in coordinating antioxidant defense mechanisms. RNAi-mediated knockdown of DNAJB14 results in complex changes to the antioxidant transcriptome, including both upregulation and downregulation of specific genes :
| Gene Category | Upregulated After DNAJB14 Knockdown | Downregulated After DNAJB14 Knockdown |
|---|---|---|
| Peroxiredoxins | Tpx4, Tpx5 | Tpx3 |
| Thioredoxins | Trx2 | TrxR1, Trx-like1 |
| Glutathione S-transferases | GSTD, GSTT1 | GSTO2, GSTZ1 |
| Kinases | CDK5, CDK5r | MKK4, p38b |
| Others | SOD1, CYP4G11, MsrB | - |
This pattern suggests that DNAJB14 may serve as a regulatory factor within antioxidant signaling pathways, with its absence triggering compensatory upregulation of some antioxidant genes while disrupting the normal expression of others . The dual nature of these effects (both activation and suppression) indicates a complex regulatory role rather than a simple positive or negative regulator.
For successful cloning and expression of recombinant DNAJB14, researchers should consider the following methodological approach:
Primer Design and PCR Amplification:
Vector Selection and Cloning:
Expression Systems:
For structure-function studies: E. coli systems with N-terminal truncations (removing the transmembrane domain) can yield soluble protein
For functional studies: Mammalian cell lines such as HeLa or CV1 cells provide appropriate cellular context for studying DNAJB14 in its natural environment
When studying overexpression effects: Use concentrated retroviral stocks to generate high expression levels
Protein Purification:
These methods have been successfully employed in previous studies to examine both the structure and function of DNAJB14 in different experimental contexts.
Designing effective knockdown experiments for DNAJB14 requires careful consideration of several methodological aspects:
RNAi Design:
Delivery Methods:
Validation of Knockdown Efficiency:
Functional Assays:
Controls and Rescue Experiments:
This comprehensive approach ensures reliable results when investigating DNAJB14 function through knockdown strategies.
Several imaging techniques have proven effective for visualizing DNAJB14 cellular localization, each with specific advantages:
Confocal Microscopy:
Immunofluorescence Protocols:
Use of epitope tags (HA-tag) facilitates detection of recombinant DNAJB14
Co-staining with organelle markers (BiP, PDI, calnexin for ER; nuclear pore complex proteins)
Fixation method is critical: Paraformaldehyde fixation preserves membrane structures
Permeabilization with mild detergents (0.1% Triton X-100) maintains structural integrity
Live Cell Imaging:
Super-Resolution Techniques:
Structured illumination microscopy (SIM) or stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy can resolve fine details of membrane structures
Single-molecule localization microscopy can provide insights into DNAJB14 clustering or interactions
Electron Microscopy:
For optimal results, researchers should combine multiple imaging approaches to gain comprehensive insights into DNAJB14 localization and dynamics.
When encountering contradictory results in DNAJB14 stress response studies, researchers should consider several analytical approaches:
Context-Dependent Effects:
DNAJB14 has different effects depending on the experimental system and stress type
For example, DNAJB14 knockdown influences different antioxidant genes in opposite ways (upregulating some while downregulating others)
Analyze results within specific cellular contexts rather than assuming universal functions
Temporal Dynamics:
Concentration-Dependent Effects:
Species and Cell-Type Variations:
Methodological Resolution Framework:
When contradictions arise, systematically evaluate:
a) Antibody specificity and validation
b) Knockdown efficiency and potential off-target effects
c) Overexpression artifacts vs. physiological functions
d) Direct vs. indirect effects through interacting partners
By applying these analytical approaches, researchers can resolve contradictions and develop more nuanced models of DNAJB14 function in stress response pathways.
When analyzing the effects of DNAJB14 knockdown on antioxidant pathways, several statistical approaches are particularly appropriate:
Differential Expression Analysis:
For qRT-PCR data on antioxidant gene expression changes:
Multiple Testing Correction:
ANOVA for Multi-Factor Experiments:
For experiments with multiple treatments or time points:
Use two-way ANOVA to separate effects of knockdown, treatment, and their interaction
Follow with appropriate post-hoc tests (Tukey's HSD, Dunnett's test) for specific comparisons
Consider repeated measures designs for time-course experiments
Correlation Analysis:
To explore relationships between:
Gene expression changes and enzyme activity levels
Oxidative stress markers and antioxidant gene expression
Use Pearson's correlation for linear relationships or Spearman's for non-linear associations
Multivariate Analysis:
For comprehensive analysis of multiple antioxidant parameters:
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to identify main sources of variation
Hierarchical clustering to identify groups of co-regulated genes
Pathway enrichment analysis to identify overrepresented functional categories
Visualization Techniques:
These statistical approaches enable rigorous analysis of complex datasets generated from DNAJB14 knockdown experiments, facilitating the identification of genuine biological effects while controlling for experimental variability.
Integrating structural data with functional studies provides a comprehensive understanding of DNAJB14's mechanism of action. Researchers should consider the following integration strategies:
Structure-Function Correlation Analysis:
Map functional data onto structural elements:
Create mutation libraries targeting specific structural features to assess their functional importance
Homology-Based Functional Prediction:
Integrated Experimental Approaches:
Combine computational structure prediction with experimental validation:
Correlate structural changes with functional outcomes:
Monitor effects of mutations on both protein structure and stress response functions
Use domain swapping experiments to test modularity of functional domains
Cross-Species Structural Analysis:
Compare DNAJB14 structures across evolutionary diverse species:
Identify conserved structural features that predict functional conservation
Use evolutionary conservation as a guide for identifying functionally critical regions
Integration with Interaction Partner Data:
This integrated approach provides mechanistic insights that neither structural nor functional studies alone could achieve, offering a more complete understanding of how DNAJB14 structure dictates its diverse cellular functions.
Based on current knowledge of DNAJB14 function, several promising avenues for therapeutic applications emerge:
Stress Response Modulation:
DNAJB14's role in regulating antioxidant pathways suggests potential for therapeutic intervention in oxidative stress-related conditions
Targeted upregulation of DNAJB14 could enhance cellular resilience against environmental toxins or oxidative damage
Applications may include neurodegenerative diseases, where protein folding stress and oxidative damage are common features
Viral Infection Intervention:
DNAJB14 and its close relative DNAJB12 are essential for simian virus 40 (SV40) infection, with knockdown reducing viral infectivity by approximately 50-fold
This suggests potential antiviral applications targeting DNAJB14-dependent viral lifecycle steps
Structure-based design of inhibitors blocking virus-DNAJB14 interactions could yield novel antiviral compounds
Membrane Dynamics Regulation:
DNAJB14's ability to induce dramatic membrane remodeling (DJANGOS) indicates potential applications in:
Cell biology research tools for manipulating nuclear membrane structures
Understanding nuclear membrane dynamics in health and disease
Developing interventions for nuclear envelope-related disorders
Protein Quality Control Enhancement:
Experimental Approach Recommendations:
High-throughput screening for small molecules that modulate DNAJB14 activity
CRISPR-based approaches for precise manipulation of DNAJB14 expression levels
Structure-guided design of peptides or compounds targeting specific DNAJB14-protein interactions
Development of tissue-specific DNAJB14 modulators to minimize off-target effects
These therapeutic directions require further research to validate DNAJB14 as a viable target and to develop specific modulators of its function in relevant disease contexts.
Advanced imaging techniques offer significant potential to enhance our understanding of DJANGOS formation through several specific approaches:
Live Cell Super-Resolution Microscopy:
Techniques such as lattice light-sheet microscopy combined with structured illumination would allow:
Multi-Color 3D Imaging:
Simultaneous visualization of multiple components:
DNAJB14/DNAJB12 distribution
Nuclear pore complex proteins
ER and nuclear membrane markers
Chromatin organization near DJANGOS
This would reveal spatial relationships and temporal sequence of recruitment during DJANGOS assembly
Correlative Light and Electron Microscopy (CLEM):
Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) and Related Techniques:
Apply to GFP-tagged DNAJB14 within DJANGOS to:
Measure protein mobility and exchange rates
Determine if DJANGOS are stable or dynamic structures
Assess connectivity with other cellular compartments
Proximity Labeling Combined with Imaging:
Use APEX2 or BioID fused to DNAJB14 to:
Identify proteins in close proximity during DJANGOS formation
Map the proteome of these unique nuclear structures
Visualize the spatial distribution of interacting partners
Cryo-Electron Tomography:
Provide detailed 3D views of DJANGOS at near-atomic resolution
Reveal how membranes are organized and connected within these structures
Visualize association with nuclear pores and potential routes of membrane entry
These advanced imaging approaches would address key questions about DJANGOS biology, including their formation mechanism, composition, dynamics, and functional significance in cellular processes.
To elucidate the relationship between DNAJB14 and DNAJB12, researchers should consider these experimental approaches:
Comparative Phenotypic Analysis:
Perform parallel knockdown and overexpression studies:
Individual DNAJB12 or DNAJB14 knockdown/overexpression
Double knockdown/overexpression
Rescue experiments (express one protein in cells depleted of the other)
Analyze effects on stress response, antioxidant pathways, and ERAD function
Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:
Investigate direct or indirect interactions between DNAJB12 and DNAJB14:
Co-immunoprecipitation assays
Proximity ligation assays in intact cells
FRET/BRET analyses to detect close association
Map interaction domains through deletion and point mutation analysis
Examine whether they form heteromeric complexes or function in separate complexes
Comparative Structure-Function Analysis:
Create domain-swapping chimeras between DNAJB12 and DNAJB14
Test functional complementation:
Which domains of DNAJB12 can substitute for DNAJB14 in DJANGOS formation?
Are J-domains functionally equivalent or do they have unique specificities?
Analyze evolutionary conservation patterns to identify shared vs. unique functional motifs
Transcriptional and Post-Transcriptional Regulation:
Investigate whether expression of one protein affects the other:
Examine mRNA levels of DNAJB14 after DNAJB12 manipulation and vice versa
Analyze protein stability and turnover interdependence
Identify shared transcriptional regulators responding to stress conditions
Comprehensive Substrate and Interactor Profiling:
Identify and compare binding partners and substrates:
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
BioID or APEX proximity labeling
Systematic analysis of client protein folding/degradation
Compare interactomes under normal and stress conditions
Create a Venn diagram of shared vs. unique interactors
High-Resolution Imaging of Co-Localization Dynamics:
Track both proteins simultaneously during:
Normal ER function
Stress responses
DJANGOS formation and dissolution
Quantify co-localization coefficients in different cellular compartments
Analyze the temporal sequence of recruitment during DJANGOS assembly
These complementary approaches would provide a comprehensive understanding of the functional relationship between these closely related proteins, revealing whether they act redundantly, cooperatively, or in distinct pathways.
Researchers working with recombinant DNAJB14 commonly encounter several technical challenges. Here are the most frequent issues and recommended solutions:
Protein Solubility and Membrane Integration Issues:
Challenge: DNAJB14 is a transmembrane protein, making full-length expression and purification difficult .
Solutions:
Express soluble domains (J-domain) separately for biochemical studies
Use detergent screening to identify optimal solubilization conditions
Consider membrane mimetics (nanodiscs, liposomes) for functional studies
When working with full-length protein, use Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol for stability
Expression Level Control:
Challenge: Overexpression causes DJANGOS formation, which may interfere with normal function studies .
Solutions:
Use inducible expression systems with titratable promoters
Monitor expression levels carefully and establish dose-response relationships
Consider stable cell lines with moderate expression levels
Use time-course studies to capture events before DJANGOS formation
Antibody Specificity Issues:
Challenge: Cross-reactivity between DNAJB14 and related DNAJ proteins.
Solutions:
Functional Redundancy with DNAJB12:
Challenge: DNAJB12 and DNAJB14 show overlapping functions, complicating interpretation .
Solutions:
Perform double knockdown experiments
Use rescue experiments with chimeric proteins to identify unique functions
Study both proteins in parallel under identical conditions
Develop specific inhibitors or activators through structure-based design
Storage and Stability:
Reproducibility in Stress Response Studies:
Challenge: Variable responses to stress conditions across experiments.
Solutions:
Standardize stress treatment protocols (duration, intensity, recovery periods)
Include positive controls for stress response activation
Account for cell density and passage number effects
Perform biological replicates across different cell batches
These solutions provide practical approaches to address the technical challenges associated with DNAJB14 research, enhancing experimental reliability and reproducibility.
Interpreting quantitative differences in DNAJB14 expression across experimental models requires a systematic analytical framework:
Cross-Model Normalization Strategies:
Reference Gene Selection:
Absolute Quantification:
Develop standard curves using known quantities of recombinant DNAJB14
Express results as molecules per cell or per unit protein
Compare absolute rather than relative levels across models
Biological Context Interpretation:
Baseline Expression Analysis:
Determine normal expression range in each model system
Consider tissue-specific expression patterns
Account for developmental stage or physiological state
Functional Thresholds:
Species-Specific Considerations:
Evolutionary Conservation Analysis:
Ortholog Identification:
Ensure proper identification of true orthologs versus paralogs
Use phylogenetic analyses to establish evolutionary relationships
Consider divergent functions despite sequence similarity
Technical Variation Assessment:
Method-Specific Biases:
Account for differences between qRT-PCR, RNA-seq, and protein quantification methods
Consider detection limits of each technique
Validate key findings using orthogonal approaches
Intra-Model Variation:
Analyze biological replicates to establish normal variation within models
Use appropriate statistical tests to distinguish significant from random variation
Report confidence intervals rather than point estimates alone
Integrated Data Interpretation Table:
This framework enables researchers to make meaningful comparisons across experimental models while accounting for both biological and technical factors that influence DNAJB14 expression measurements.
The most significant recent advances in understanding DNAJB14 function span several key areas:
Structural Characterization:
Novel Nuclear Membrane Dynamics:
Stress Response Integration:
Demonstration of DNAJB14's role in coordinating antioxidant defense mechanisms
Characterization of its differential expression under various stress conditions, including cold, UV radiation, and agrochemical exposure
Identification of specific downstream targets regulated by DNAJB14 in stress response pathways
Functional Partnership with Hsc70:
Viral Lifecycle Involvement:
These advances have significantly expanded our understanding of DNAJB14 beyond its classical role as an ER-resident co-chaperone, revealing its multifaceted functions in membrane dynamics, stress responses, and host-pathogen interactions.
A clear consensus has emerged regarding several key physiological roles of DNAJB14, supported by evidence across multiple studies:
Protein Quality Control:
DNAJB14 functions as an essential component of endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD)
It cooperates with Hsc70 to facilitate the extraction and degradation of misfolded proteins from the ER
This quality control function is critical for maintaining ER homeostasis and preventing proteotoxic stress
Stress Response Coordination:
DNAJB14 serves as a regulator of antioxidant defense mechanisms
Its expression is differentially modulated in response to various stressors, including temperature extremes, UV radiation, and chemical exposures
Knockdown studies confirm its importance in maintaining antioxidant enzyme activities (CAT, GST, SOD) and controlling oxidative damage markers
Membrane Organization and Dynamics:
Host-Pathogen Interactions:
DNAJB14 plays a critical role in facilitating the lifecycle of certain viruses, such as SV40
Its knockdown substantially reduces viral infectivity, highlighting its importance in virus-host interactions
This function may represent either viral co-option of normal DNAJB14 activities or a specialized adaptation
Co-Chaperone Function:
The J-domain of DNAJB14 stimulates the ATPase activity of Hsc70/Hsp70 chaperones
This co-chaperone activity underpins many of its cellular functions, from protein quality control to stress responses
The HPD tripeptide is essential for this function, as demonstrated by its conservation across species and functional requirement in experimental systems