Recombinant Pongo abelii DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 14 (DNAJB14)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to Recombinant Pongo abelii DnaJ Homolog Subfamily B Member 14 (DNAJB14)

Recombinant Pongo abelii DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 14 (DNAJB14) refers to a recombinant protein derived from the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii). DNAJB14 is part of the DnaJ heat shock protein family, which plays a crucial role in protein folding and degradation processes within cells. This protein is particularly significant in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) and acts as a co-chaperone for Hsc70/Hsp70 heat shock proteins .

Function and Role of DNAJB14

DNAJB14 is a type II transmembrane protein located in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). It functions by facilitating the proper folding of proteins and aiding in the degradation of misfolded proteins through ERAD. This process is essential for maintaining cellular homeostasis and preventing the accumulation of toxic protein aggregates .

Key Functions:

  • Protein Folding and Quality Control: DNAJB14 assists in the folding of newly synthesized proteins and helps eliminate misfolded proteins from the ER.

  • Co-chaperone Activity: It acts as a co-chaperone for Hsc70/Hsp70, enhancing their ATPase activity and facilitating protein folding.

  • Viral Infection: DNAJB14 is crucial for the infection process of certain viruses, such as simian virus 40 (SV40), by facilitating viral capsid disassembly and nuclear entry .

Research Findings on DNAJB14

Recent studies have highlighted the importance of DNAJB14 in various cellular processes:

Recombinant Protein Production

The recombinant Pongo abelii DNAJB14 protein is produced using advanced biotechnology techniques. This involves cloning the DNAJB14 gene into an expression vector, followed by transformation into a suitable host organism where the protein is expressed and purified.

Applications and Future Directions

Recombinant DNAJB14 proteins can be used in various research applications, including studies on protein folding, ER stress, and viral infection mechanisms. Additionally, they may serve as tools for understanding evolutionary conserved functions across different species.

Potential Applications:

  • Basic Research: Investigating protein folding mechanisms and ERAD pathways.

  • Virology: Studying viral infection processes and developing antiviral strategies.

  • Biotechnology: Developing novel therapeutic proteins or diagnostic tools.

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for fulfillment according to your needs.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice is specifically requested. Advance notification is required for dry ice shipments, and additional fees will apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type will be determined during the production process. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
DNAJB14; DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 14
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-379
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Pongo abelii (Sumatran orangutan) (Pongo pygmaeus abelii)
Target Names
DNAJB14
Target Protein Sequence
MEGNRDEAEKCVEIAREALNAGNREKAQRFLQKAEKLYPLPSARALLEIIMKNGSTAGNS PHCRKPSGSGDQSKPNCTKDSTSGSGEGGKGYTKDQVDGVLSINKCKNCYEVLGVTKDAG DEDLKKAYRKLALKFHPDKNHAPGATDAFKKIGNAYAVLSNPEKRKQYDLTGNEEQACNH QNNGRFNFHRGCEADITPEDLFNIFFGGGFPSGSVHSFSNGRAGYSQQHQHRHSGHEREE ERGDGGFSVFIQLMPIIVLILVSLLSQLMVSNPPYSLYPRSGTGQTIKMQTENLGVVYYV NKDFKNEYKGMLLQKVEKSVEEDYVTNIRNNCWKERQQKTDMQYAAKVYRDDRLRRKADA LSMDNCKELERLTSLYKGG
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

Recombinant Pongo abelii DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 14 (DNAJB14) functions as a co-chaperone with HSPA8/Hsc70. It plays a crucial role in protein folding and trafficking, preventing aggregation of client proteins, and directing misfolded proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) pathway. DNAJB14 modulates HSPA8/Hsc70's ATPase and polypeptide-binding activities. It also exhibits HSPA8/Hsc70-independent activity, working with DNAJB12 to chaperone the maturation of potassium channels KCND2 and KCNH2. This involves stabilizing nascent channel subunits and facilitating their assembly into tetramers. While HSPA8/Hsc70 is essential for stabilizing nascent channel proteins, the oligomerization process is independent of HSPA8/Hsc70. Overexpression of DNAJB14, in conjunction with DNAJB12 and HSPA8/Hsc70, results in the formation of nuclear membranous structures termed DJANGOs, whose function remains to be fully elucidated.

Database Links
Protein Families
DnaJ family, DNAJB12/DNAJB14 subfamily
Subcellular Location
Endoplasmic reticulum membrane; Single-pass membrane protein. Nucleus membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the basic structure of DNAJB14?

DNAJB14 is a type II transmembrane protein localized in the endoplasmic reticulum. The protein contains a J-domain with four α-helices (helix I, helix II, helix III, and helix IV) and a conserved HPD (His, Pro, and Asp) tripeptide located between helix II and helix III . Structural analysis reveals that DNAJB14 from Pongo abelii (Sumatran orangutan) contains a transmembrane domain located at amino acids 172-194, which anchors the protein to the ER membrane . The J-domain is highly conserved across species, showing greater homology to those of other animals than other protein regions . The protein's complete amino acid sequence includes 379 residues with the cytoplasmic J-domain positioned on the cytoplasmic face of the ER membrane .

How does DNAJB14 function as a co-chaperone?

DNAJB14 serves as a co-chaperone for Hsc70/Hsp70 heat shock proteins through its J-domain, which increases the folding activity of these catalytically active chaperones . The conserved HPD tripeptide in the J-domain is critical for this function, as it mediates the interaction with Hsc70/Hsp70 and stimulates their ATPase activity . As a type II transmembrane protein, DNAJB14 positions its J-domain on the cytoplasmic face of the ER membrane, allowing it to recruit cytosolic Hsc70 to the ER surface . This arrangement enables DNAJB14 to participate in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD), a quality control mechanism in which improperly folded proteins in the ER lumen or membrane are extracted and degraded in the cytoplasm .

What are DJANGOS and how does DNAJB14 contribute to their formation?

DJANGOS (as named by researchers) are elaborate intranuclear membranous structures that form when DNAJB14 or its related protein DNAJB12 are overexpressed . These structures appear as numerous punctate formations within cell nuclei that stain intensely for both the overexpressed DNAJ proteins and endogenous Hsc70 . Genetic experiments have revealed that DJANGOS formation requires:

  • A functional J-domain in DNAJB14/DNAJB12

  • The presence of Hsc70

  • The expression of DNAJB12 (DNAJB14 overexpression cannot induce DJANGOS in DNAJB12 knockdown cells)

These structures emerge from a novel configuration of membranes in proximity to atypical nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) and represent a dramatic remodeling of membranes associated with a subset of nuclear pores . DJANGOS appear to form coordinately in individual nuclei and disappear synchronously during cell division, suggesting a regulated process rather than random membrane invasion .

How do DNAJB14 expression levels affect cellular stress responses?

DNAJB14 plays crucial roles in cellular stress responses, particularly in antioxidant defense mechanisms. Experimental data from Apis cerana cerana shows that DNAJB14 expression is differentially regulated under various stress conditions, including:

Stress TypeEffect on DNAJB14 ExpressionTimeframe of Significant Change
Cold stressUpregulation1-3 hours after exposure
UV radiationDownregulation1-3 hours after exposure
Abamectin exposureSignificant upregulation24 hours after exposure
Imidacloprid exposureModerate upregulation24 hours after exposure
Cypermethrin exposureSlight upregulation24 hours after exposure

Knockdown experiments revealed that silencing DNAJB14 affects antioxidant enzyme activities and oxidative stress markers :

  • Decreased enzymatic activities of catalase (CAT), glutathione S-transferase (GST), and superoxide dismutase (SOD)

  • Increased malondialdehyde (MDA) and protein carbonyl content (indicators of oxidative damage)

  • Reduced vitamin C content (an important antioxidant)

These findings demonstrate that DNAJB14 is an integral component of cellular stress response pathways, particularly in managing oxidative stress .

What is the relationship between DNAJB14 and antioxidant gene expression?

DNAJB14 influences the expression of numerous antioxidant genes, highlighting its role in coordinating antioxidant defense mechanisms. RNAi-mediated knockdown of DNAJB14 results in complex changes to the antioxidant transcriptome, including both upregulation and downregulation of specific genes :

Gene CategoryUpregulated After DNAJB14 KnockdownDownregulated After DNAJB14 Knockdown
PeroxiredoxinsTpx4, Tpx5Tpx3
ThioredoxinsTrx2TrxR1, Trx-like1
Glutathione S-transferasesGSTD, GSTT1GSTO2, GSTZ1
KinasesCDK5, CDK5rMKK4, p38b
OthersSOD1, CYP4G11, MsrB-

This pattern suggests that DNAJB14 may serve as a regulatory factor within antioxidant signaling pathways, with its absence triggering compensatory upregulation of some antioxidant genes while disrupting the normal expression of others . The dual nature of these effects (both activation and suppression) indicates a complex regulatory role rather than a simple positive or negative regulator.

What are the most effective methods for cloning and expressing recombinant DNAJB14?

For successful cloning and expression of recombinant DNAJB14, researchers should consider the following methodological approach:

  • Primer Design and PCR Amplification:

    • Design specific primers based on the coding sequence (CDS) of DNAJB14 (such as Gene ID: 107994739 for Apis cerana DNAJB14)

    • Use high-fidelity DNA polymerase for PCR amplification to minimize errors

    • Include appropriate restriction sites for subsequent cloning steps

  • Vector Selection and Cloning:

    • For bacterial expression, pET-series vectors are commonly used

    • For mammalian expression, vectors with an HA-tag can facilitate detection (as used in DJANGOS studies)

    • Consider retroviral vectors for stable integration and controlled expression levels

  • Expression Systems:

    • For structure-function studies: E. coli systems with N-terminal truncations (removing the transmembrane domain) can yield soluble protein

    • For functional studies: Mammalian cell lines such as HeLa or CV1 cells provide appropriate cellular context for studying DNAJB14 in its natural environment

    • When studying overexpression effects: Use concentrated retroviral stocks to generate high expression levels

  • Protein Purification:

    • If using recombinant protein with tags, affinity chromatography is recommended

    • Store in Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol at -20°C or -80°C for extended storage

    • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles by storing working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week

These methods have been successfully employed in previous studies to examine both the structure and function of DNAJB14 in different experimental contexts.

How can researchers effectively design knockdown experiments for studying DNAJB14 function?

Designing effective knockdown experiments for DNAJB14 requires careful consideration of several methodological aspects:

  • RNAi Design:

    • Design specific dsRNA or shRNA targeting unique regions of DNAJB14 mRNA

    • Include appropriate controls such as dsRNA targeting GFP or other non-relevant genes

    • Validate multiple targeting sequences to identify those with highest knockdown efficiency

  • Delivery Methods:

    • For cultured cells: Transfection with lipid-based reagents or electroporation

    • For stable knockdown: Use retroviral or lentiviral vectors expressing shRNAs

    • For in vivo studies (e.g., in insects): Feeding dsRNA has proven effective

  • Validation of Knockdown Efficiency:

    • Quantify mRNA levels using qRT-PCR with appropriate reference genes (e.g., β-actin)

    • Confirm protein reduction via Western blotting if antibodies are available

    • Establish dose-response relationships and time courses for knockdown effects

  • Functional Assays:

    • Enzymatic activity measurements (CAT, SOD, GST, POD)

    • Oxidative stress markers (MDA, protein carbonyl content, vitamin C levels)

    • Gene expression analysis of downstream targets using qRT-PCR

    • Imaging studies to assess effects on cellular structures and protein localization

  • Controls and Rescue Experiments:

    • Use both non-targeting and non-relevant gene knockdowns as controls

    • Perform rescue experiments with RNAi-resistant DNAJB14 constructs to confirm specificity

    • Consider knockdown of related proteins (e.g., DNAJB12) to assess redundancy

This comprehensive approach ensures reliable results when investigating DNAJB14 function through knockdown strategies.

What imaging techniques are most appropriate for visualizing DNAJB14 cellular localization?

Several imaging techniques have proven effective for visualizing DNAJB14 cellular localization, each with specific advantages:

  • Confocal Microscopy:

    • Most widely used technique for visualizing DNAJB14 localization

    • Provides excellent resolution for examining ER distribution and nuclear structures

    • Enables multi-channel imaging to assess co-localization with other proteins

    • Has been successfully used to visualize DJANGOS formation in nuclei

  • Immunofluorescence Protocols:

    • Use of epitope tags (HA-tag) facilitates detection of recombinant DNAJB14

    • Co-staining with organelle markers (BiP, PDI, calnexin for ER; nuclear pore complex proteins)

    • Fixation method is critical: Paraformaldehyde fixation preserves membrane structures

    • Permeabilization with mild detergents (0.1% Triton X-100) maintains structural integrity

  • Live Cell Imaging:

    • Fluorescent protein fusions (GFP-DNAJB14) allow for real-time visualization

    • Time-lapse microscopy can capture dynamic processes such as DJANGOS formation and dissolution during cell division

    • Photoactivatable or photoconvertible tags can track protein movement between compartments

  • Super-Resolution Techniques:

    • Structured illumination microscopy (SIM) or stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy can resolve fine details of membrane structures

    • Single-molecule localization microscopy can provide insights into DNAJB14 clustering or interactions

  • Electron Microscopy:

    • Transmission electron microscopy with immunogold labeling can visualize DNAJB14 at the ultrastructural level

    • Particularly valuable for examining membrane structures like DJANGOS in detail

For optimal results, researchers should combine multiple imaging approaches to gain comprehensive insights into DNAJB14 localization and dynamics.

How should researchers interpret contradictory results in DNAJB14 stress response studies?

When encountering contradictory results in DNAJB14 stress response studies, researchers should consider several analytical approaches:

  • Context-Dependent Effects:

    • DNAJB14 has different effects depending on the experimental system and stress type

    • For example, DNAJB14 knockdown influences different antioxidant genes in opposite ways (upregulating some while downregulating others)

    • Analyze results within specific cellular contexts rather than assuming universal functions

  • Temporal Dynamics:

    • Stress responses are often time-dependent, with different phases of response

    • Consider time-course experiments to capture the dynamic nature of DNAJB14 involvement

    • For instance, cold stress shows different effects on DNAJB14 expression at different timepoints

  • Concentration-Dependent Effects:

    • DNAJB14 overexpression studies show threshold effects for phenomena like DJANGOS formation

    • Normal expression vs. overexpression may have qualitatively different outcomes

    • Establish dose-response relationships whenever possible

  • Species and Cell-Type Variations:

    • Results from different model systems (e.g., human cells vs. insect cells) may differ

    • Construct careful phylogenetic analyses to establish functional conservation across species

    • Validate findings across multiple cell types or model organisms

  • Methodological Resolution Framework:

    • When contradictions arise, systematically evaluate:
      a) Antibody specificity and validation
      b) Knockdown efficiency and potential off-target effects
      c) Overexpression artifacts vs. physiological functions
      d) Direct vs. indirect effects through interacting partners

By applying these analytical approaches, researchers can resolve contradictions and develop more nuanced models of DNAJB14 function in stress response pathways.

What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing DNAJB14 knockdown effects on antioxidant pathways?

When analyzing the effects of DNAJB14 knockdown on antioxidant pathways, several statistical approaches are particularly appropriate:

  • Differential Expression Analysis:

    • For qRT-PCR data on antioxidant gene expression changes:

      • Use Student's t-test for pairwise comparisons between knockdown and control groups

      • Apply significance thresholds (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01) to identify statistically significant changes

      • Consider fold-change thresholds in addition to p-values to focus on biologically relevant changes

  • Multiple Testing Correction:

    • When analyzing large sets of antioxidant genes (as in Figure 7) :

      • Apply Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to control false discovery rate

      • Consider family-wise error rate correction for smaller, targeted gene sets

      • Report both raw and adjusted p-values for transparency

  • ANOVA for Multi-Factor Experiments:

    • For experiments with multiple treatments or time points:

      • Use two-way ANOVA to separate effects of knockdown, treatment, and their interaction

      • Follow with appropriate post-hoc tests (Tukey's HSD, Dunnett's test) for specific comparisons

      • Consider repeated measures designs for time-course experiments

  • Correlation Analysis:

    • To explore relationships between:

      • Gene expression changes and enzyme activity levels

      • Oxidative stress markers and antioxidant gene expression

      • Use Pearson's correlation for linear relationships or Spearman's for non-linear associations

  • Multivariate Analysis:

    • For comprehensive analysis of multiple antioxidant parameters:

      • Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to identify main sources of variation

      • Hierarchical clustering to identify groups of co-regulated genes

      • Pathway enrichment analysis to identify overrepresented functional categories

  • Visualization Techniques:

    • Bar graphs with error bars for enzyme activities and gene expression

    • Heat maps for visualizing patterns across multiple genes

    • Volcano plots to display both significance and magnitude of changes

These statistical approaches enable rigorous analysis of complex datasets generated from DNAJB14 knockdown experiments, facilitating the identification of genuine biological effects while controlling for experimental variability.

How can structural data be integrated with functional studies to understand DNAJB14 mechanism of action?

Integrating structural data with functional studies provides a comprehensive understanding of DNAJB14's mechanism of action. Researchers should consider the following integration strategies:

  • Structure-Function Correlation Analysis:

    • Map functional data onto structural elements:

      • The conserved J-domain with its HPD tripeptide is essential for interaction with Hsc70 and DJANGOS formation

      • The transmembrane domain (aa 172-194) determines ER localization and membrane topology

    • Create mutation libraries targeting specific structural features to assess their functional importance

  • Homology-Based Functional Prediction:

    • Utilize the high conservation of the J-domain across species to predict functional properties

    • Compare tertiary structures of J-domains from different DnaJ proteins to identify unique features of DNAJB14

    • Create the following comparative analysis table:

Structural FeatureConservation StatusKnown FunctionExperimental Support
J-domain α-helicesHighly conserved across speciesHsc70 binding and activationCo-immunoprecipitation, DJANGOS formation assays
HPD tripeptideInvariant in DNAJB14 (unlike DNAJB13)Critical for Hsc70 interactionMutational analysis, co-localization studies
Transmembrane domainVariable sequence, conserved positionER membrane anchoringImmunofluorescence localization, DJANGOS formation
  • Integrated Experimental Approaches:

    • Combine computational structure prediction with experimental validation:

      • Use SWISS-MODEL and SPDBV for structure prediction

      • Validate with circular dichroism or limited proteolysis

    • Correlate structural changes with functional outcomes:

      • Monitor effects of mutations on both protein structure and stress response functions

      • Use domain swapping experiments to test modularity of functional domains

  • Cross-Species Structural Analysis:

    • Compare DNAJB14 structures across evolutionary diverse species:

      • Pongo abelii (Sumatran orangutan)

      • Apis cerana cerana (Eastern honeybee)

      • Human DNAJB14

    • Identify conserved structural features that predict functional conservation

    • Use evolutionary conservation as a guide for identifying functionally critical regions

  • Integration with Interaction Partner Data:

    • Map interaction sites with Hsc70 on the DNAJB14 structure

    • Identify structural elements required for DJANGOS formation

    • Create structural models of DNAJB14 in different functional states (resting state, active during stress, membrane remodeling during DJANGOS formation)

This integrated approach provides mechanistic insights that neither structural nor functional studies alone could achieve, offering a more complete understanding of how DNAJB14 structure dictates its diverse cellular functions.

What are the most promising avenues for therapeutic applications targeting DNAJB14?

Based on current knowledge of DNAJB14 function, several promising avenues for therapeutic applications emerge:

  • Stress Response Modulation:

    • DNAJB14's role in regulating antioxidant pathways suggests potential for therapeutic intervention in oxidative stress-related conditions

    • Targeted upregulation of DNAJB14 could enhance cellular resilience against environmental toxins or oxidative damage

    • Applications may include neurodegenerative diseases, where protein folding stress and oxidative damage are common features

  • Viral Infection Intervention:

    • DNAJB14 and its close relative DNAJB12 are essential for simian virus 40 (SV40) infection, with knockdown reducing viral infectivity by approximately 50-fold

    • This suggests potential antiviral applications targeting DNAJB14-dependent viral lifecycle steps

    • Structure-based design of inhibitors blocking virus-DNAJB14 interactions could yield novel antiviral compounds

  • Membrane Dynamics Regulation:

    • DNAJB14's ability to induce dramatic membrane remodeling (DJANGOS) indicates potential applications in:

      • Cell biology research tools for manipulating nuclear membrane structures

      • Understanding nuclear membrane dynamics in health and disease

      • Developing interventions for nuclear envelope-related disorders

  • Protein Quality Control Enhancement:

    • As a component of ERAD, DNAJB14 participates in clearing misfolded proteins

    • Therapeutic strategies enhancing this function could address:

      • Protein aggregation diseases

      • ER stress-related pathologies

      • Age-related decline in proteostasis

  • Experimental Approach Recommendations:

    • High-throughput screening for small molecules that modulate DNAJB14 activity

    • CRISPR-based approaches for precise manipulation of DNAJB14 expression levels

    • Structure-guided design of peptides or compounds targeting specific DNAJB14-protein interactions

    • Development of tissue-specific DNAJB14 modulators to minimize off-target effects

These therapeutic directions require further research to validate DNAJB14 as a viable target and to develop specific modulators of its function in relevant disease contexts.

How might advanced imaging techniques further our understanding of DJANGOS formation?

Advanced imaging techniques offer significant potential to enhance our understanding of DJANGOS formation through several specific approaches:

  • Live Cell Super-Resolution Microscopy:

    • Techniques such as lattice light-sheet microscopy combined with structured illumination would allow:

      • Real-time visualization of DJANGOS formation at nanoscale resolution

      • Tracking membrane dynamics during nuclear invasion

      • Correlation with cell cycle stages to understand why DJANGOS disappear during division

  • Multi-Color 3D Imaging:

    • Simultaneous visualization of multiple components:

      • DNAJB14/DNAJB12 distribution

      • Nuclear pore complex proteins

      • ER and nuclear membrane markers

      • Chromatin organization near DJANGOS

    • This would reveal spatial relationships and temporal sequence of recruitment during DJANGOS assembly

  • Correlative Light and Electron Microscopy (CLEM):

    • Combine fluorescence microscopy with electron microscopy to:

      • Identify DJANGOS by fluorescence

      • Examine ultrastructural details at nanometer resolution

      • Visualize membrane continuity and connections to nuclear pores

  • Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) and Related Techniques:

    • Apply to GFP-tagged DNAJB14 within DJANGOS to:

      • Measure protein mobility and exchange rates

      • Determine if DJANGOS are stable or dynamic structures

      • Assess connectivity with other cellular compartments

  • Proximity Labeling Combined with Imaging:

    • Use APEX2 or BioID fused to DNAJB14 to:

      • Identify proteins in close proximity during DJANGOS formation

      • Map the proteome of these unique nuclear structures

      • Visualize the spatial distribution of interacting partners

  • Cryo-Electron Tomography:

    • Provide detailed 3D views of DJANGOS at near-atomic resolution

    • Reveal how membranes are organized and connected within these structures

    • Visualize association with nuclear pores and potential routes of membrane entry

These advanced imaging approaches would address key questions about DJANGOS biology, including their formation mechanism, composition, dynamics, and functional significance in cellular processes.

What experimental approaches would best elucidate the relationship between DNAJB14 and DNAJB12?

To elucidate the relationship between DNAJB14 and DNAJB12, researchers should consider these experimental approaches:

  • Comparative Phenotypic Analysis:

    • Perform parallel knockdown and overexpression studies:

      • Individual DNAJB12 or DNAJB14 knockdown/overexpression

      • Double knockdown/overexpression

      • Rescue experiments (express one protein in cells depleted of the other)

    • Assess DJANGOS formation efficiency under each condition

    • Analyze effects on stress response, antioxidant pathways, and ERAD function

  • Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:

    • Investigate direct or indirect interactions between DNAJB12 and DNAJB14:

      • Co-immunoprecipitation assays

      • Proximity ligation assays in intact cells

      • FRET/BRET analyses to detect close association

    • Map interaction domains through deletion and point mutation analysis

    • Examine whether they form heteromeric complexes or function in separate complexes

  • Comparative Structure-Function Analysis:

    • Create domain-swapping chimeras between DNAJB12 and DNAJB14

    • Test functional complementation:

      • Which domains of DNAJB12 can substitute for DNAJB14 in DJANGOS formation?

      • Are J-domains functionally equivalent or do they have unique specificities?

    • Analyze evolutionary conservation patterns to identify shared vs. unique functional motifs

  • Transcriptional and Post-Transcriptional Regulation:

    • Investigate whether expression of one protein affects the other:

      • Examine mRNA levels of DNAJB14 after DNAJB12 manipulation and vice versa

      • Analyze protein stability and turnover interdependence

      • Identify shared transcriptional regulators responding to stress conditions

  • Comprehensive Substrate and Interactor Profiling:

    • Identify and compare binding partners and substrates:

      • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry

      • BioID or APEX proximity labeling

      • Systematic analysis of client protein folding/degradation

    • Compare interactomes under normal and stress conditions

    • Create a Venn diagram of shared vs. unique interactors

  • High-Resolution Imaging of Co-Localization Dynamics:

    • Track both proteins simultaneously during:

      • Normal ER function

      • Stress responses

      • DJANGOS formation and dissolution

    • Quantify co-localization coefficients in different cellular compartments

    • Analyze the temporal sequence of recruitment during DJANGOS assembly

These complementary approaches would provide a comprehensive understanding of the functional relationship between these closely related proteins, revealing whether they act redundantly, cooperatively, or in distinct pathways.

What are common challenges in working with recombinant DNAJB14 and how can they be addressed?

Researchers working with recombinant DNAJB14 commonly encounter several technical challenges. Here are the most frequent issues and recommended solutions:

  • Protein Solubility and Membrane Integration Issues:

    • Challenge: DNAJB14 is a transmembrane protein, making full-length expression and purification difficult .

    • Solutions:

      • Express soluble domains (J-domain) separately for biochemical studies

      • Use detergent screening to identify optimal solubilization conditions

      • Consider membrane mimetics (nanodiscs, liposomes) for functional studies

      • When working with full-length protein, use Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol for stability

  • Expression Level Control:

    • Challenge: Overexpression causes DJANGOS formation, which may interfere with normal function studies .

    • Solutions:

      • Use inducible expression systems with titratable promoters

      • Monitor expression levels carefully and establish dose-response relationships

      • Consider stable cell lines with moderate expression levels

      • Use time-course studies to capture events before DJANGOS formation

  • Antibody Specificity Issues:

    • Challenge: Cross-reactivity between DNAJB14 and related DNAJ proteins.

    • Solutions:

      • Validate antibodies using knockdown cells as negative controls

      • Use epitope tags (HA, FLAG) for specific detection of recombinant protein

      • Develop antibodies targeting unique regions outside the conserved J-domain

      • Perform parallel detection with different antibodies to confirm specificity

  • Functional Redundancy with DNAJB12:

    • Challenge: DNAJB12 and DNAJB14 show overlapping functions, complicating interpretation .

    • Solutions:

      • Perform double knockdown experiments

      • Use rescue experiments with chimeric proteins to identify unique functions

      • Study both proteins in parallel under identical conditions

      • Develop specific inhibitors or activators through structure-based design

  • Storage and Stability:

    • Challenge: Recombinant DNAJB14 may lose activity during storage.

    • Solutions:

      • Store in Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol at -20°C or -80°C

      • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

      • Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week

      • Test activity regularly to ensure functional integrity

  • Reproducibility in Stress Response Studies:

    • Challenge: Variable responses to stress conditions across experiments.

    • Solutions:

      • Standardize stress treatment protocols (duration, intensity, recovery periods)

      • Include positive controls for stress response activation

      • Account for cell density and passage number effects

      • Perform biological replicates across different cell batches

These solutions provide practical approaches to address the technical challenges associated with DNAJB14 research, enhancing experimental reliability and reproducibility.

How should researchers interpret quantitative differences in DNAJB14 expression across different experimental models?

Interpreting quantitative differences in DNAJB14 expression across experimental models requires a systematic analytical framework:

  • Cross-Model Normalization Strategies:

    • Reference Gene Selection:

      • Use multiple reference genes (e.g., β-actin, GAPDH, 18S rRNA)

      • Validate reference gene stability across experimental conditions

      • Apply geometric mean normalization when using multiple references

    • Absolute Quantification:

      • Develop standard curves using known quantities of recombinant DNAJB14

      • Express results as molecules per cell or per unit protein

      • Compare absolute rather than relative levels across models

  • Biological Context Interpretation:

    • Baseline Expression Analysis:

      • Determine normal expression range in each model system

      • Consider tissue-specific expression patterns

      • Account for developmental stage or physiological state

    • Functional Thresholds:

      • Identify critical expression levels that trigger specific phenotypes (e.g., DJANGOS formation requires substantial overexpression)

      • Determine minimum levels required for stress protection functions

      • Map quantitative expression to qualitative outcomes

  • Species-Specific Considerations:

    • Evolutionary Conservation Analysis:

      • Compare expression patterns between species (e.g., Pongo abelii vs. Apis cerana cerana)

      • Consider differences in protein function across lineages

      • Account for species-specific stress response mechanisms

    • Ortholog Identification:

      • Ensure proper identification of true orthologs versus paralogs

      • Use phylogenetic analyses to establish evolutionary relationships

      • Consider divergent functions despite sequence similarity

  • Technical Variation Assessment:

    • Method-Specific Biases:

      • Account for differences between qRT-PCR, RNA-seq, and protein quantification methods

      • Consider detection limits of each technique

      • Validate key findings using orthogonal approaches

    • Intra-Model Variation:

      • Analyze biological replicates to establish normal variation within models

      • Use appropriate statistical tests to distinguish significant from random variation

      • Report confidence intervals rather than point estimates alone

  • Integrated Data Interpretation Table:

Expression LevelInsect Model (A. cerana)Primate Model (P. abelii)Human Cell LinesFunctional Interpretation
Very lowCompromised stress response Not determinedReduced viral defense Below functional threshold
Normal/BaselineBalanced antioxidant response Normal ER function Normal ERAD activity Homeostatic range
Moderately elevatedEnhanced stress resistance Not determinedEnhanced ERAD Adaptive response
Highly elevatedNot determinedNot determinedDJANGOS formation Structural reorganization

This framework enables researchers to make meaningful comparisons across experimental models while accounting for both biological and technical factors that influence DNAJB14 expression measurements.

What are the most significant recent advances in understanding DNAJB14 function?

The most significant recent advances in understanding DNAJB14 function span several key areas:

  • Structural Characterization:

    • Identification of the transmembrane domain at amino acids 172-194

    • Confirmation of the conserved J-domain structure with four α-helices and the critical HPD tripeptide

    • Development of tertiary structure models showing the spatial arrangement of functional domains

  • Novel Nuclear Membrane Dynamics:

    • Discovery of DJANGOS formation upon DNAJB14 overexpression, revealing an unexpected role in nuclear membrane remodeling

    • Identification of the requirement for functional J-domain and Hsc70 in this process

    • Recognition that these structures emerge from membranes associated with nuclear pore complexes

  • Stress Response Integration:

    • Demonstration of DNAJB14's role in coordinating antioxidant defense mechanisms

    • Characterization of its differential expression under various stress conditions, including cold, UV radiation, and agrochemical exposure

    • Identification of specific downstream targets regulated by DNAJB14 in stress response pathways

  • Functional Partnership with Hsc70:

    • Confirmation of DNAJB14 as a co-chaperone for Hsc70/Hsp70 heat shock proteins

    • Evidence that this partnership is critical for both ERAD functions and DJANGOS formation

    • Demonstration of co-localization of Hsc70 with DNAJB14 in both normal and stress conditions

  • Viral Lifecycle Involvement:

    • Recognition that DNAJB14 plays an essential role in simian virus 40 (SV40) infection

    • Determination that it facilitates viral capsid exit from the ER lumen prior to nuclear entry

    • Potential as an antiviral target due to its critical role in viral infection processes

These advances have significantly expanded our understanding of DNAJB14 beyond its classical role as an ER-resident co-chaperone, revealing its multifaceted functions in membrane dynamics, stress responses, and host-pathogen interactions.

What consensus has emerged regarding the most important physiological roles of DNAJB14?

A clear consensus has emerged regarding several key physiological roles of DNAJB14, supported by evidence across multiple studies:

  • Protein Quality Control:

    • DNAJB14 functions as an essential component of endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD)

    • It cooperates with Hsc70 to facilitate the extraction and degradation of misfolded proteins from the ER

    • This quality control function is critical for maintaining ER homeostasis and preventing proteotoxic stress

  • Stress Response Coordination:

    • DNAJB14 serves as a regulator of antioxidant defense mechanisms

    • Its expression is differentially modulated in response to various stressors, including temperature extremes, UV radiation, and chemical exposures

    • Knockdown studies confirm its importance in maintaining antioxidant enzyme activities (CAT, GST, SOD) and controlling oxidative damage markers

  • Membrane Organization and Dynamics:

    • At physiological levels, DNAJB14 contributes to normal ER membrane organization

    • When overexpressed, it induces dramatic membrane remodeling, resulting in DJANGOS formation

    • This suggests a fundamental role in regulating membrane curvature or stability, particularly at ER-nuclear interfaces

  • Host-Pathogen Interactions:

    • DNAJB14 plays a critical role in facilitating the lifecycle of certain viruses, such as SV40

    • Its knockdown substantially reduces viral infectivity, highlighting its importance in virus-host interactions

    • This function may represent either viral co-option of normal DNAJB14 activities or a specialized adaptation

  • Co-Chaperone Function:

    • The J-domain of DNAJB14 stimulates the ATPase activity of Hsc70/Hsp70 chaperones

    • This co-chaperone activity underpins many of its cellular functions, from protein quality control to stress responses

    • The HPD tripeptide is essential for this function, as demonstrated by its conservation across species and functional requirement in experimental systems

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.