Recombinant HrpB is typically produced in E. coli with affinity tags (e.g., His₁₀-Smt3) for purification. Key steps include:
Cloning: HrpB operons are amplified and ligated into expression vectors (e.g., pTrc99a) .
Purification: Nickel-affinity chromatography followed by size-exclusion chromatography yields >90% pure protein .
Tag Removal: Proteolytic cleavage (e.g., Ulp1 protease) eliminates tags without affecting enzymatic activity .
HrpB operates via a metal-dependent mechanism:
Magnesium Binding: Tightly associates with Mg²⁺ (IC₅₀ for EDTA = 125 µM), essential for ATP hydrolysis .
RNA Interaction:
Experimental data from recombinant HrpB studies include:
| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ATPase Turnover (poly(A)) | 349 ± 24 min⁻¹ | |
| ATP Km | 20 ± 4 µM | |
| RNA Stimulation (vs. basal) | 10-fold (poly(A)), 2-fold (rRNA) | |
| EDTA Inhibition (IC₅₀) | 125 µM |
While HrpB’s primary role is in RNA metabolism, its ATPase activity shares parallels with mitochondrial ATP synthase dysfunction linked to neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., impaired proton coupling in Parkinson’s) . Notably, HrpB’s auxiliary domains resemble regulatory subunits in ATP synthase (e.g., IF₁), suggesting conserved mechanisms in energy metabolism .
HrpB6 Specificity: The exact role of "hrpB6" remains undefined; further structural studies (e.g., cryo-EM) are needed to resolve its unique features.
Therapeutic Targeting: Modulating HrpB’s ATPase activity could inform antimicrobial strategies, given its homology to virulence-associated bacterial helicases .
ATP synthase hrpB6 functions within the larger ATP synthase complex, which is responsible for catalyzing ATP synthesis by utilizing the electrochemical gradient of protons across membranes during oxidative phosphorylation. Unlike the well-characterized mammalian ATP5F1B subunit, which forms part of the membrane-extrinsic catalytic sector where ATP is formed from ADP and inorganic phosphate, hrpB6 has distinct structural and functional properties . The protein adopts specific conformations that enable it to participate in the energy conversion process, though its exact mechanistic role differs from the catalytic β subunits that can bind to Mg-ADP (βDP), Mg-ATP (βTP), or remain empty (βE) . Research approaches to understanding hrpB6 should focus on comparative structural analysis with other ATP synthase components to elucidate its unique functional attributes.
For effective recombinant production of ATP synthase components like hrpB6, yeast expression systems have demonstrated particular utility. Based on related ATP synthase component production methods, expression in yeast provides appropriate post-translational modifications while maintaining protein functionality . When designing expression constructs, consideration should be given to including affinity tags (such as 6xHis-tag) at the N-terminus to facilitate purification, while ensuring the tag doesn't interfere with protein folding or function . For optimal expression, researchers should evaluate multiple expression systems including bacterial (E. coli), yeast (P. pastoris, S. cerevisiae), and mammalian cells (HEK293, CHO), comparing yield, solubility, and activity to determine the most suitable system for their specific research needs.
Identity and purity verification of recombinant hrpB6 requires a multi-technique approach. SDS-PAGE should be utilized to assess purity and confirm the expected molecular weight, with >90% purity considered suitable for most functional studies . Western blotting with specific antibodies provides confirmation of protein identity, while mass spectrometry offers definitive sequence verification and can detect post-translational modifications. For functional verification, ATP hydrolysis or synthesis assays should be performed to confirm catalytic activity, comparing results with established ATP synthase components. Additionally, circular dichroism spectroscopy can verify proper protein folding, particularly important when optimizing expression and purification protocols for maximum yield of functional protein.
Recent research has uncovered a sophisticated metabolic signal relay system involving ATP synthase regulation through NADH sensing. While not directly addressing hrpB6, these findings suggest potential regulatory mechanisms applicable to various ATP synthase components. Studies have identified an interaction between mitochondrial apoptosis-inducing factor 1 (AIFM1) and adenylate kinase 2 (AK2) that functions as a gatekeeper for ATP synthase activity . This interaction is NADH-dependent and influenced by glycolytic activity, directly linking ATP synthase function to the cell's metabolic state . Researchers investigating hrpB6 should explore whether it participates in or is regulated by similar NADH-sensing mechanisms. Experimental approaches should include co-immunoprecipitation studies with AIFM1/AK2, NADH-binding assays, and functional studies under varying NADH:NAD+ ratios to determine if hrpB6 plays a role in this regulatory network.
Understanding hrpB6 function under limiting energetic conditions requires specialized methodological approaches. Research on ancient ATP synthases has demonstrated ATP synthesis capability at physiologically relevant driving forces as low as 90-150 mV, particularly in anaerobic archaea with V-type subunit c . To investigate hrpB6 under similar conditions, researchers should employ reconstitution of the protein into liposomes with precisely controlled internal and external pH and ion concentrations. Membrane potential can be established using valinomycin-induced K+ diffusion potentials or acid-base transitions. ATP synthesis rates should be measured under systematically varied driving forces (50-200 mV) using luciferase-based ATP detection assays. This approach allows determination of the minimum proton-motive force required for hrpB6-containing ATP synthase function, providing insights into its bioenergetic efficiency and evolutionary adaptations.
Studying hrpB6 structural dynamics within the complete ATP synthase complex requires advanced structural biology techniques. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has emerged as the preferred method for visualizing ATP synthase in different conformational states, allowing researchers to observe hrpB6 interactions within the native complex. Sample preparation should include gentle purification using specialized detergents (DDM, LMNG) that maintain complex integrity. For dynamic studies, researchers should utilize hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to identify regions of hrpB6 that undergo conformational changes during the catalytic cycle. Cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) complements these approaches by capturing transient interactions between hrpB6 and other subunits . Molecular dynamics simulations based on structural data can further elucidate conformational changes not captured experimentally, providing a comprehensive understanding of hrpB6's role in the ATP synthesis mechanism.
When designing activity assays for recombinant hrpB6, researchers must consider its catalytic context within the ATP synthase complex. Unlike isolated catalytic subunits that may retain some functionality, hrpB6 likely requires interaction with other ATP synthase components for measurable activity. Assay design should include:
Buffer composition optimization with varying pH (6.5-8.5), ion concentrations (particularly Mg2+), and ATP/ADP ratios
Temperature optimization based on the organism of origin (30-55°C range)
Inclusion of appropriate detergents for membrane-associated proteins
Selection of detection methods:
Colorimetric phosphate release assays for ATP hydrolysis
Luciferase-based assays for ATP synthesis
Coupled enzyme assays for continuous monitoring
Controls including known ATP synthase inhibitors (oligomycin, DCCD) to verify specificity
For more physiologically relevant measurements, researchers should consider reconstitution into proteoliposomes that allow establishment of proton gradients to drive ATP synthesis activity, more closely mimicking the protein's native environment .
Expression challenges with recombinant hrpB6 production typically stem from protein misfolding, aggregation, or toxicity to the host system. To address these issues:
Optimize codon usage for the chosen expression system, particularly for rare codons that may cause translational pausing
Test multiple fusion tags beyond standard His-tags, including MBP, GST, or SUMO tags that enhance solubility
Reduce expression temperature (16-20°C) and inducer concentration to slow production and improve folding
Co-express molecular chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK/J) to assist proper folding
Consider cell-free expression systems for proteins toxic to living cells
For membrane-associated regions, include appropriate detergents in lysis and purification buffers
Implement on-column refolding protocols for proteins that form inclusion bodies
A systematic approach testing multiple conditions in parallel using small-scale expressions can efficiently identify optimal parameters before scaling up to production quantities. If expression in traditional systems proves challenging, consider specialized expression hosts adapted for difficult membrane proteins .
Studying hrpB6 interactions with other ATP synthase components requires techniques that can capture both stable and transient protein-protein interactions. Recommended approaches include:
Co-immunoprecipitation with antibodies against hrpB6 or potential interacting partners, followed by mass spectrometry identification
Pull-down assays using tagged recombinant hrpB6 as bait
Crosslinking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) to identify interaction interfaces with amino acid resolution
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) or bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) for studying interactions in living cells
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) for quantitative binding measurements
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to identify protected regions upon complex formation
Each technique offers different advantages, and a multi-method approach provides the most comprehensive understanding. For instance, XL-MS can identify specific amino acid contacts between hrpB6 and other subunits, while FRET can verify these interactions in a cellular context and provide kinetic information about complex assembly .
Interpreting kinetic data from hrpB6-containing ATP synthase complexes requires careful consideration of several factors:
Compare ATP synthesis rates across different proton motive force values (50-200 mV) to establish the minimum energetic requirement and efficiency profile
Analyze data using appropriate enzyme kinetic models:
Michaelis-Menten kinetics for substrate affinity (Km) and maximum velocity (Vmax)
Hill equation for cooperative binding effects
Multi-site catalysis models that account for rotary catalysis mechanism
Consider the stoichiometry of protons transported per ATP synthesized (H+/ATP ratio), which typically ranges from 3-4 H+ per ATP
Evaluate the impact of different experimental conditions:
pH effects on both sides of the membrane
Temperature dependence for thermodynamic parameters
Influence of membrane composition on enzyme activity
Data should be presented in comprehensive tables showing:
| Proton Motive Force (mV) | ATP Synthesis Rate (nmol/min/mg) | H+/ATP Ratio | Efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | 10.2 ± 1.5 | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 42.3 ± 3.8 |
| 120 | 25.6 ± 2.3 | 3.3 ± 0.3 | 65.7 ± 5.2 |
| 160 | 42.1 ± 3.7 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 78.9 ± 6.1 |
This approach allows researchers to determine whether hrpB6-containing complexes have adapted to function efficiently at lower energetic inputs, similar to ATP synthases found in certain anaerobic organisms .
Structural data analysis for hrpB6 requires attention to several key considerations:
Sequence-structure relationships:
Quality assessment of structural models:
Evaluate resolution limits of experimental data
Assess model validation metrics (Ramachandran plots, rotamer analysis)
Consider flexibility and dynamics not captured in static structures
Functional interpretation:
Identify potential ion binding sites by analyzing charged residue distributions
Map mutations known to affect function onto the structure
Examine interfaces with other subunits to understand complex assembly
Integration with biochemical data:
Correlate structural features with observed kinetic parameters
Use structure to design rational mutations for functional studies
Develop structure-based hypotheses about catalytic mechanism
When comparing hrpB6 to related proteins like ATP5F1B, researchers should pay particular attention to the conformational states that catalytic subunits can adopt (βDP, βTP, βE) and how these relate to the ATP synthesis mechanism .
Effectively comparing hrpB6 function across species or metabolic conditions requires standardized experimental approaches and comprehensive data collection:
Standardize expression and purification protocols:
Implement consistent activity assays:
Maintain identical buffer conditions, temperature, and pH
Use the same detection methods across experiments
Include internal standards for normalization
Collect comprehensive metabolic context data:
Analyze evolutionary context:
Construct phylogenetic trees of hrpB6 sequences
Correlate sequence variations with functional differences
Consider environmental adaptations of source organisms
Data should be presented in comprehensive comparative tables:
| Species | ATP Synthesis Rate | NADH Sensitivity | Minimum PMF (mV) | Key Adaptations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species A | 45.3 ± 4.2 | High (EC50 = 0.8 μM) | 120 ± 15 | R215K, T310A |
| Species B | 32.7 ± 3.1 | Moderate (EC50 = 2.3 μM) | 95 ± 10 | D112N, V405L |
| Species C | 58.9 ± 5.7 | Low (EC50 = 5.1 μM) | 150 ± 18 | G217R, L334I |
This systematic approach allows researchers to identify patterns of functional adaptation and correlate them with specific structural features or environmental pressures, providing insights into the evolutionary history and specialized functions of hrpB6 across different organisms .
Several cutting-edge technologies hold promise for advancing hrpB6 research:
Cryo-electron tomography can visualize ATP synthase complexes containing hrpB6 in their native membrane environment, revealing organizational principles and supramolecular assemblies
Single-molecule FRET techniques allow real-time monitoring of conformational changes in hrpB6 during the catalytic cycle
Nanopore-based approaches can measure proton translocation at the single-molecule level, directly correlating it with ATP synthesis
CRISPR-based genetic screening in model organisms can identify genetic interactions and regulatory networks involving hrpB6
AlphaFold and other AI-based structural prediction tools can model hrpB6 structures from previously challenging organisms, expanding our comparative understanding
These technologies will enable researchers to connect molecular mechanisms to physiological functions, particularly in understanding how hrpB6-containing ATP synthases may function as metabolic sensors through NADH-dependent interactions, similar to the AIFM1/AK2 gatekeeper mechanism recently discovered .
Research on hrpB6 has significant implications for understanding metabolic adaptation across various conditions:
Studies of hrpB6 function at low driving forces (90-150 mV) provide insights into bioenergetic efficiency at the thermodynamic limit of ATP synthesis, particularly relevant for organisms living in energy-limited environments
The potential role of hrpB6 in NADH-sensing mechanisms may reveal how ATP synthase activity is regulated in response to changing metabolic states, linking glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation efficiency
Comparative analysis of hrpB6 across species adapted to different environments can uncover evolutionary strategies for maintaining ATP homeostasis under varying conditions
Understanding hrpB6 function may provide insights into metabolic diseases related to ATP synthase dysfunction, potentially opening new therapeutic approaches
Research methodologies should focus on integrating hrpB6 functional studies with systems biology approaches to map its role in broader metabolic networks, particularly in response to stress conditions like nutrient limitation, hypoxia, or temperature fluctuation .
Research on ATP synthase components like hrpB6 has significant implications for understanding mitochondrial diseases:
Functional characterization of hrpB6 may provide insights into metabolic signaling pathways disrupted in AIFM1-related mitochondrial diseases, as the AIFM1/AK2 gatekeeper of ATP synthase represents a newly identified regulatory mechanism
Understanding how hrpB6 functions at varying proton motive forces can illuminate bioenergetic deficiencies in mitochondrial disorders characterized by decreased membrane potential
Comparative analysis between wild-type and disease-associated variants can identify specific functional defects in ATP synthesis regulation
Development of assay systems for hrpB6 function could provide platforms for screening potential therapeutic compounds that modulate ATP synthase activity
Researchers exploring these connections should implement:
Patient-derived cell models to study hrpB6 function in disease contexts
CRISPR-engineered cell lines with specific hrpB6 modifications
High-throughput functional assays suitable for compound screening
Systems biology approaches to map metabolic consequences of hrpB6 dysfunction
This research direction highlights the translational potential of basic research on ATP synthase components like hrpB6, connecting fundamental bioenergetic mechanisms to human health and disease .