Recombinant Prochlorococcus marinus subsp. pastoris Lipoyl synthase 2 (lipA2)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder.
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice is specifically requested in advance. Additional fees apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, provided as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is finalized during production. If a specific tag type is required, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
lipA2; lipA; PMM1096Lipoyl synthase 2; EC 2.8.1.8; Lip-syn 2; LS 2; Lipoate synthase 2; Lipoic acid synthase 2; Sulfur insertion protein LipA 2
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-299
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Prochlorococcus marinus subsp. pastoris (strain CCMP1986 / NIES-2087 / MED4)
Target Names
lipA2
Target Protein Sequence
MKNKNQMKVE KILRLPSWIK FPISKASEFE KMQRLIRKSN IHTICEEGRC PNRAECYASG TATFLLGGSI CSRACAFCQV NKGKPSEINK YESIQVAEAV KILNLKYVVL TSVARDDLPD HGANLFVSTI NQIRKIDPKI QIEVLTPDLW GGGKSFEDKD KLQKDRLKKI LEQRPICFNH NLETVERLQK EVRRGANYKN SIGLLEKAKS IAPNIQTKSG IMLGLGETLK EIETTILDLK KVDCNQITIG QYLRPSLKHL SVKKYWAPKE FEYLKSFCSK LGFKKVSCGP LVRSSYHAG
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein catalyzes the radical-mediated insertion of two sulfur atoms into the C-6 and C-8 positions of the octanoyl moiety bound to the lipoyl domains of lipoate-dependent enzymes, thus converting the octanoylated domains into lipoylated derivatives.
Database Links

KEGG: pmm:PMM1096

STRING: 59919.PMM1096

Protein Families
Radical SAM superfamily, Lipoyl synthase family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Lipoyl synthase 2 (lipA2) and what is its role in Prochlorococcus marinus?

Lipoyl synthase 2 (lipA2) is an enzyme (EC 2.8.1.8) involved in the biosynthesis of lipoic acid in Prochlorococcus marinus. It catalyzes the insertion of sulfur atoms into octanoyl substrates to form lipoic acid, a crucial cofactor for several enzyme complexes involved in oxidative metabolism. In Prochlorococcus marinus subsp. pastoris (strain CCMP1986/NIES-2087/MED4), lipA2 plays a vital role in cellular metabolism and responses to oxidative stress .

The enzyme consists of 299 amino acids with a molecular weight of approximately 36 kDa. Its protein sequence contains highly conserved motifs, particularly cysteine-rich regions that are crucial for its catalytic activity. The amino acid sequence includes several conserved motifs that coordinate iron-sulfur clusters, which are essential for its function in sulfur insertion reactions .

How does lipA2 differ from other lipoyl synthases structurally and functionally?

Prochlorococcus marinus lipA2 differs from classical lipoyl synthases in several key ways:

  • Sequence variations: While traditional lipoyl synthases (LipA) contain conserved CX₃CX₂C motifs that coordinate iron-sulfur clusters, lipA2 in P. marinus contains additional conserved cysteine-rich motifs that distinguish it from classical LipA proteins. These include unique C-terminal domain motifs not found in classical LipA homologs .

  • Structural organization: Unlike some novel lipoyl synthases found in hyperthermophilic archaea like Thermococcus kodakarensis that function as two-protein systems (LipS1/LipS2), lipA2 in Prochlorococcus functions as a single protein but with potentially different structural arrangements of its iron-sulfur clusters .

  • Functional adaptation: The lipA2 in Prochlorococcus appears to be adapted to the organism's unique ecological niche and may contribute to its ability to withstand oxidative stress conditions in marine environments. This adaptation is reflected in its structure and catalytic properties .

What are the recommended protocols for expressing and purifying recombinant lipA2?

Based on established protocols for similar lipoyl synthases, the following procedure is recommended for expressing and purifying recombinant Prochlorococcus marinus lipA2:

  • Expression system: Use E. coli as an expression host, preferably BL21(DE3) strain or derivatives optimized for iron-sulfur proteins .

  • Vector selection: Employ expression vectors with T7 promoter systems that can accommodate the full-length protein (299 amino acids) .

  • Induction conditions:

    • Culture growth at 37°C until OD₆₀₀ reaches 0.6-0.8

    • Reduce temperature to 18-20°C before induction

    • Induce with 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG

    • Supplement medium with iron (50-100 μM ferric ammonium citrate) and cysteine (100-200 μM)

  • Purification strategy:

    • Harvest cells and lyse under anaerobic or low-oxygen conditions

    • Initial capture using affinity chromatography (His-tag purification)

    • Further purification via ion exchange chromatography

    • Final polishing with size exclusion chromatography

    • Maintain reducing conditions (1-5 mM DTT or TCEP) throughout purification

  • Iron-sulfur cluster reconstitution: After purification, reconstitute the iron-sulfur clusters using:

    • 5-10 fold molar excess of ferric chloride

    • 5-10 fold molar excess of sodium sulfide

    • Incubation under anaerobic conditions

    • Removal of excess iron and sulfide by desalting

The reconstitution of iron-sulfur clusters is critical for obtaining enzymatically active lipA2, as demonstrated with similar lipoyl synthases where activity is significantly enhanced after cluster reconstitution .

How can I design an assay to measure lipA2 enzymatic activity in vitro?

To effectively measure lipA2 enzymatic activity, you should implement a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) based assay, which can detect both intermediate and final products of the reaction:

  • Reaction components:

    • Purified reconstituted lipA2 (10-50 μM)

    • Octanoylated peptide substrate (200-500 μM)

    • SAM (S-adenosylmethionine) (1-2 mM)

    • Sodium dithionite as electron donor (1-2 mM)

    • Buffer: 50 mM HEPES or Tris, pH 7.5-8.0

    • 150 mM NaCl

    • Optional: 5-10% glycerol for protein stability

  • Reaction setup:

    • Prepare reaction mix under anaerobic conditions

    • Initiate reaction by adding sodium dithionite

    • Incubate at 30-37°C

    • Remove aliquots at various time points (0, 15, 30, 60 min)

  • Analysis via LC-MS:

    • Quench reaction aliquots with acidified solution (300 mM H₂SO₄)

    • Include reducing agent (TCEP) in quench solution

    • Add internal standard peptide for quantification

    • Centrifuge samples to remove precipitated proteins

    • Analyze by UPLC-MS/MS using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)

  • Chromatography conditions:

    • Column: C18 (1.8-2.5 μm particle size)

    • Mobile phase A: 0.1% formic acid in water

    • Mobile phase B: Acetonitrile

    • Gradient: 2-65% B over 2-3 minutes

    • Flow rate: 0.3 ml/min

  • Detectable products:

    • Octanoylated substrate (starting material)

    • Mono-thiolated intermediate (thiol-octanoyl-peptide)

    • Lipoylated product (final product)

    • Reduced lipoylated product

This assay setup allows for monitoring the formation of both the intermediate thiol-octanoyl-peptide and the final lipoylated product, providing insights into the reaction mechanism and kinetics of lipA2 .

How does lipA2 activity in Prochlorococcus relate to oxidative stress responses?

Lipoyl synthase 2 plays a crucial role in Prochlorococcus marinus' oxidative stress response through multiple mechanisms:

  • Diurnal regulation: Studies of Prochlorococcus under light/dark cycles have shown that resistance to oxidative stress varies throughout the day. The connection to lipA2 is established through the production of lipoic acid, which serves as a powerful antioxidant and cofactor for enzymes involved in managing oxidative stress .

  • H₂O₂ sensitivity: Prochlorococcus shows variable sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide throughout the day, with highest sensitivity at midday and greater resistance during dark periods. These patterns correlate with changes in metabolic activity controlled by lipoylated enzyme complexes .

  • Comparative stress response: When compared with Synechococcus, Prochlorococcus demonstrates significantly different PSII (Photosystem II) responses to oxidative stress. While both experience photoinhibition when exposed to H₂O₂, Prochlorococcus exhibits greater sensitivity to oxidative damage, with PSII inactivation occurring at lower H₂O₂ concentrations (starting at ~100 μM H₂O₂) .

The relationship between lipA2 activity and oxidative stress response can be quantitatively assessed using the b-value from hyperbolic decay functions of PSII quantum yield versus H₂O₂ concentration, as shown in the following data from related experiments:

Table 1: Comparative PSII Resistance to H₂O₂-Induced Oxidative Stress

TimeProchlorococcus b-value (VL)Prochlorococcus b-value (VL+UV)Synechococcus b-value (VL)Synechococcus b-value (VL+UV)
6:00~400~350~1200~800
9:00~250~50~600~300
12:00~100~100~300~150
15:00~150~200~400~200
18:00~200~250~600~400

VL: Visible Light; VL+UV: Visible Light plus UV radiation. Higher b-values indicate greater resistance to oxidative stress.

These findings suggest that proper function of lipoic acid metabolism, including lipA2 activity, is crucial for maintaining cellular redox balance and protecting against oxidative damage in Prochlorococcus, particularly during periods of high light exposure and UV radiation.

What role does lipA2 play in the photosynthetic apparatus maintenance in Prochlorococcus?

Lipoyl synthase 2 contributes significantly to photosynthetic apparatus maintenance in Prochlorococcus through several mechanisms:

  • PSII repair cycle: Lipoic acid, synthesized by lipA2, serves as a cofactor for enzymes involved in protein synthesis, which is critical for the PSII repair cycle. When PSII is damaged by light or oxidative stress, rapid protein synthesis is required to replace the damaged D1 protein .

  • Protection against ROS damage: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) trigger D1 degradation in PSII. The lipoic acid produced through lipA2 activity acts as an antioxidant that helps mitigate ROS-mediated damage to the photosynthetic apparatus .

  • Light/dark cycle adaptation: PSII repair rates in Prochlorococcus vary throughout the day, with distinct patterns observed under different light conditions. The repair rate can be experimentally determined by measuring PSII quantum yield in the presence and absence of lincomycin (a protein synthesis inhibitor) .

The measurement of PSII repair can be conducted using the following protocol:

Procedure for measuring PSII repair rates:

  • Split culture samples into control and lincomycin-treated subcultures

  • Add lincomycin (500 μg/mL) to inhibit protein synthesis

  • Measure PSII quantum yield (Fv/Fm) at intervals (0, 15, 30, 60 min)

  • Plot PSII quantum yield over time for both conditions

  • Fit plots with exponential decay functions

  • Calculate the difference between decay rates to determine the PSII repair rate

The formula for PSII quantum yield is:

FV/FM=(FMF0)/FMF_V/F_M = (F_M - F_0)/F_M

Where:

  • F₀ is the basal fluorescence level

  • Fₘ is the maximal fluorescence measured in the presence of DCMU (50 μM)

  • Fᵥ is the variable fluorescence

This methodology reveals that Prochlorococcus has evolved specific adaptations in its photosynthetic apparatus maintenance that differ from those in Synechococcus, with lipA2-dependent processes playing a key role in these adaptations.

How can I investigate the interaction between lipA2 and iron-sulfur cluster assembly proteins?

Investigating interactions between lipA2 and iron-sulfur cluster assembly proteins requires a multi-faceted approach:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) studies:

    • Express tagged versions of lipA2 (His-tag, FLAG-tag, etc.)

    • Prepare cell lysates under anaerobic conditions

    • Use antibodies against the tag to pull down lipA2

    • Analyze co-precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry to identify interacting iron-sulfur assembly proteins

    • Confirm interactions with reciprocal Co-IP using antibodies against potential interacting partners

  • Functional reconstitution assays:
    Based on research with human lipoyl synthase, test the following proteins for interaction with lipA2:

    • Iron-sulfur cluster scaffold proteins (ISCU homologs)

    • A-type iron-sulfur cluster carrier proteins (ISCA homologs)

    • Glutaredoxins (GLRX homologs)

    • Specialized iron-sulfur cluster transfer proteins (NFU homologs)

    Experimental setup:

    • Prepare reaction mixtures containing lipA2 and individual iron-sulfur assembly proteins (200 μM each)

    • Include substrate and SAM

    • For GLRX-containing reactions, add reduced glutathione (1 mM)

    • For direct cluster transfer tests, include sodium citrate (5 mM)

    • Monitor activity using the LC-MS assay described earlier

  • Structural analysis:

    • Perform crystallography on lipA2 alone and in complex with iron-sulfur assembly proteins

    • Focus on the positioning of the two [4Fe-4S] clusters within the TIM barrel structure

    • Compare structures to the known arrangements in classical lipoyl synthases

    • Look for unique structural features at the interface between lipA2 and assembly proteins

  • Mutagenesis studies:

    • Target the conserved cysteine residues in lipA2, especially the GC(M/A)R and CC motifs

    • Create alanine substitutions of these residues

    • Assess the impact of mutations on:

      • Protein-protein interactions

      • Iron-sulfur cluster incorporation

      • Enzymatic activity

    • Compare these results with similar studies on classical LipA to identify differences in assembly mechanisms

This comprehensive approach will provide insights into the unique aspects of iron-sulfur cluster assembly and utilization in Prochlorococcus lipA2 compared to classical lipoyl synthases.

What are the key differences in reaction mechanism between lipA2 and classical lipoyl synthases?

The reaction mechanism of Prochlorococcus marinus lipA2 differs from classical lipoyl synthases in several important aspects:

  • Iron-sulfur cluster utilization:
    Classical lipoyl synthases like E. coli LipA use two [4Fe-4S] clusters:

    • A "radical SAM" cluster for generating 5'-deoxyadenosyl radical

    • An "auxiliary" cluster that serves as the sulfur donor

    In contrast, Prochlorococcus lipA2 may utilize its iron-sulfur clusters differently, potentially involving unique cysteine-rich motifs not found in classical LipA proteins .

  • Intermediate formation:
    Studies with similar systems suggest that lipA2 may form a detectable thiol-octanoyl intermediate. This is similar to the mechanism observed in T. kodakarensis where the LipS2 protein (one component of the novel lipoyl synthase) generates the first sulfur insertion intermediate .

  • Conserved motifs involved in catalysis:
    Classical LipA proteins contain conserved CX₃CX₂C motifs, while lipA2 contains additional motifs:

    • GC(M/A)R motif

    • CC motif

    • Other conserved cysteine-containing sequences

    These additional motifs likely play specific roles in the sulfur insertion reaction or in forming protein complexes necessary for activity .

  • Proposed reaction mechanism comparison:

Table 2: Comparison of Reaction Mechanisms

StepClassical LipA (E. coli)Prochlorococcus lipA2 (Proposed)
SAM utilizationUses two SAM molecules sequentiallyLikely uses two SAM molecules but possibly with different positioning
First sulfur insertionSulfur from auxiliary cluster creates C6 thioetherMay involve specific cysteine residues from GC(M/A)R motif
IntermediateMono-thiolated octanoyl intermediateThiol-octanoyl intermediate detectable by LC-MS
Second sulfur insertionSecond sulfur insertion at C8May involve CC motif for the second sulfur insertion
Iron-sulfur cluster regenerationRequires complete cluster regeneration systemMay use unique regeneration pathway involving specialized proteins
  • Experimental evidence for mechanism differences:

    • LC-MS analysis of lipA2 reaction products can detect thiol-octanoyl intermediate with m/z value of 1,006.51

    • Detection of additional unidentified reaction products (peaks U1-U4 in HPLC analysis) suggests potential novel reaction intermediates or side products

    • Low activity of non-reconstituted lipA2 compared to reconstituted enzyme indicates critical dependence on properly formed iron-sulfur clusters

To fully elucidate the distinctive mechanism of lipA2, future research should focus on:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of the unique cysteine-containing motifs

  • Time-resolved spectroscopy to capture transient reaction intermediates

  • Detailed structural analysis of lipA2 with bound substrates and intermediates

  • Computational modeling of the reaction trajectory compared to classical LipA

How has lipA2 evolved to support Prochlorococcus adaptation to marine environments?

Prochlorococcus marinus has evolved unique adaptations of its lipoyl synthase system to thrive in challenging marine environments:

  • Niche-specific adaptations:
    Prochlorococcus dominates nutrient-poor, high-light tropical and subtropical ocean regions. The lipA2 enzyme has likely evolved to function optimally under these conditions, with specific adaptations to handle:

    • High light intensities

    • UV radiation exposure

    • Fluctuating nutrient availability

    • Oxidative stress conditions characteristic of surface ocean waters

  • Differential stress responses compared to Synechococcus:
    Comparative studies between Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus reveal distinct patterns in oxidative stress management that reflect their different ecological niches:

    • Prochlorococcus shows higher sensitivity to H₂O₂ than Synechococcus

    • PSII in Prochlorococcus is affected by lower H₂O₂ concentrations (starting at ~100 μM)

    • The pattern of daily variations in oxidative stress resistance differs between the two genera

    • UV-acclimated Prochlorococcus cells show dramatically enhanced sensitivity to oxidative stress at mid-morning (9:00)

  • Evolutionary differences in metabolic cycling:
    Lipoic acid-dependent enzymes are crucial for central metabolism and redox balance. The lipA2 evolution in Prochlorococcus has supported the development of unique metabolic cycling patterns:

    • Distinct diel rhythms in photosynthetic capacity

    • Specialized PSII repair mechanisms

    • Optimized energy allocation strategies under nutrient limitation

  • Sequence-level adaptations:
    The protein sequence of Prochlorococcus lipA2 shows specific adaptations compared to classical lipoyl synthases and even to those in related cyanobacteria:

    • Unique conserved motifs containing cysteine residues

    • Adaptations in the TIM barrel structure

    • Modified substrate binding sites potentially optimized for Prochlorococcus-specific lipoyl domains

These evolutionary adaptations highlight how Prochlorococcus has fine-tuned its lipoic acid metabolism to support its ecological success as the most abundant photosynthetic organism in many oceanic regions.

What genomic context surrounds the lipA2 gene in Prochlorococcus and how does it compare to other cyanobacteria?

The genomic context of the lipA2 gene in Prochlorococcus provides important insights into its evolution and functional relationships:

Understanding these genomic context differences provides valuable insights into how lipoic acid metabolism has been adapted to support the specialized lifestyle of Prochlorococcus in marine environments.

What are the common challenges in expressing active recombinant lipA2 and how can they be overcome?

Researchers working with recombinant Prochlorococcus marinus lipA2 often encounter several challenges in obtaining active enzyme. Here are the main issues and recommended solutions:

  • Low solubility and inclusion body formation:

    Challenge: Overexpression of lipA2 in E. coli often leads to inclusion body formation.

    Solutions:

    • Reduce expression temperature to 16-18°C after induction

    • Use lower IPTG concentrations (0.1-0.2 mM)

    • Employ solubility-enhancing fusion tags (SUMO, MBP, TrxA)

    • Optimize codon usage for E. coli expression

    • Use specialized E. coli strains designed for difficult proteins (e.g., Rosetta, Arctic Express)

  • Iron-sulfur cluster incorporation:

    Challenge: Proper assembly of iron-sulfur clusters is critical for activity but often incomplete in recombinant systems.

    Solutions:

    • Co-express with iron-sulfur cluster assembly proteins (ISC or SUF system components)

    • Supplement growth media with iron (ferric ammonium citrate, 50-100 μM)

    • Add L-cysteine (100-200 μM) to media as sulfur source

    • Grow cells under microaerobic conditions (reduced aeration)

    • Perform all purification steps under anaerobic or low-oxygen conditions

  • Cluster degradation during purification:

    Challenge: Iron-sulfur clusters are oxygen-sensitive and can degrade during purification.

    Solutions:

    • Use anaerobic chambers for all purification steps

    • Include reducing agents (5 mM DTT or 2 mM TCEP) in all buffers

    • Add glycerol (10%) to stabilize protein structure

    • Work quickly and maintain low temperatures (4°C)

    • Consider chemical reconstitution of iron-sulfur clusters after purification

  • Reconstitution of iron-sulfur clusters:

    Challenge: In vitro reconstitution often yields incomplete or improperly assembled clusters.

    Solutions:

    • Use strict anaerobic conditions for reconstitution

    • Optimize iron:sulfide:protein ratios (typically 5-10:5-10:1)

    • Include a suitable reducing agent (5 mM DTT)

    • Allow sufficient incubation time (2-4 hours at room temperature)

    • Remove excess iron and sulfide immediately after reconstitution

    • Monitor reconstitution by UV-visible spectroscopy

  • Activity assessment complications:

    Challenge: Low or inconsistent enzymatic activity in biochemical assays.

    Solutions:

    • Ensure complete reconstitution before activity assays

    • Use freshly prepared SAM and reducing agents

    • Optimize substrate concentrations (200-500 μM octanoylated peptide)

    • Ensure anaerobic conditions during assays

    • Consider potential inhibitory effects of buffer components

    • Use sensitive LC-MS methods for product detection

Table 4: Troubleshooting Guide for Common Issues with Recombinant lipA2

IssuePossible CausesDiagnostic SignsSolutions
No protein expressionPoor plasmid transformation, toxic proteinNo band on SDS-PAGECheck plasmid integrity, reduce expression levels, use tight promoter control
Insoluble proteinOverexpression, improper foldingProtein in pellet after lysisLower temperature, use solubility tags, optimize lysis conditions
Inactive enzymeMissing iron-sulfur clustersBrown color absent, low A410/A280 ratioPerform chemical reconstitution, handle under anaerobic conditions
Rapid activity lossOxygen sensitivity, protein instabilityDecreasing activity over timeAdd glycerol and reducing agents, aliquot and flash-freeze
Poor substrate conversionSuboptimal reaction conditionsLow product formation by LC-MSOptimize pH, temperature, and substrate concentrations

By addressing these common challenges using the recommended approaches, researchers can significantly improve the expression, purification, and activity of recombinant Prochlorococcus marinus lipA2.

How can I analyze the interaction between lipA2 and its substrates to optimize reaction conditions?

Analyzing the interaction between lipA2 and its substrates requires a systematic approach to understand binding mechanisms and optimize reaction conditions:

By systematically analyzing these aspects of lipA2-substrate interactions, researchers can develop optimized reaction conditions that maximize activity and provide insights into the unique catalytic properties of Prochlorococcus marinus lipA2.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.