Recombinant Prochlorococcus marinus subsp. pastoris Ribosome-recycling factor (frr)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder Note: We will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. However, if you require a specific format, please specify this during order placement. We will accommodate your request to the best of our ability.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates. Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping is available upon request with an additional charge. Please contact us in advance to arrange this.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to ensure contents settle. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer components, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is recommended for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process. The specific tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
frr; PMM0521; Ribosome-recycling factor; RRF; Ribosome-releasing factor
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-182
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Prochlorococcus marinus subsp. pastoris (strain CCMP1986 / NIES-2087 / MED4)
Target Names
frr
Target Protein Sequence
MKEQEIQSSM NKSVEATQRN FNTIRTGRAN ASLLDRISVE YYGAETPIKS LASISTIDSQ TISIQPFDIS SLQTIEKAIS VSDLGITPNN DGKVIRINVP PLTEERRKEF CKLASKYAEE GKVALRNIRR DAVDKEKKDE KEGLISKDVS RDNQLEIQKF TDKYISLIET KLSEKEKEIL KV
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

This protein is responsible for releasing ribosomes from messenger RNA (mRNA) at the termination of protein biosynthesis. It may also enhance translational efficiency by recycling ribosomes between successive rounds of translation.

Database Links

KEGG: pmm:PMM0521

STRING: 59919.PMM0521

Protein Families
RRF family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Prochlorococcus marinus and why is it significant for ribosome-recycling factor research?

Prochlorococcus marinus is a globally abundant and ecologically important marine cyanobacterium that plays a crucial role in oceanic carbon and nutrient cycling . Its significance for ribosome-recycling factor research stems from its unique adaptations to nutrient-poor environments and its streamlined genome. Prochlorococcus has evolved specific molecular mechanisms for translation efficiency in oligotrophic conditions, making its ribosome-recycling systems particularly interesting for comparative studies.

Unlike many other microorganisms, Prochlorococcus exhibits a strong dependency on microbial interactions for survival during extended nutrient starvation periods rather than having robust independent survival mechanisms . This ecological context suggests that its translation termination and ribosome-recycling systems may have distinctive features optimized for rapid response to changing nutrient availability.

How does ribosome-recycling factor function differ between E. coli and Prochlorococcus marinus?

ParameterE. coli RRFProchlorococcus RRFSignificance
Recycling time with RRF alone~15 secondsLikely longer due to adaptation to slower growthReflects ecological niche differences
Dependency on EF-GHighPotentially modified interactionAdaptation to nutrient-limited conditions
Temperature optimum37°CLower (20-25°C)Reflects oceanic temperature adaptation
Salt dependencyModerateHighAdaptation to marine environment

In E. coli, the presence of RRF reduces ribosome recycling time from approximately 40 seconds to 15 seconds . This time is further reduced to less than 6 seconds when both RRF and RF3 are present . This synergistic effect suggests that RRF and RF3 catalyze separate rate-limiting steps in the recycling process.

For Prochlorococcus, which grows more slowly and in more constant environments than E. coli, we would expect potentially different kinetics, possibly with modifications that prioritize energy efficiency over speed.

What is the molecular mechanism of ribosome recycling in prokaryotes?

Ribosome recycling in prokaryotes is a multi-step process that requires several factors working in sequence:

  • Termination phase: When the ribosome reaches a stop codon, release factors (RF1 or RF2, and RF3) recognize the stop signal and promote the hydrolysis of the peptidyl-tRNA bond, releasing the completed polypeptide.

  • Post-termination complex formation: After peptide release, the ribosome remains bound to the mRNA with a deacylated tRNA in the P-site.

  • RRF and EF-G action: Ribosome-recycling factor (RRF) binds to the A-site of the post-termination complex. Elongation factor G (EF-G) then catalyzes the dissociation of the 70S ribosome into 30S and 50S subunits through GTP hydrolysis.

  • Subunit dissociation and mRNA release: The action of RRF and EF-G leads to the release of mRNA and tRNA from the 30S subunit, enabling the ribosomal subunits to engage in new rounds of translation.

Experimental evidence indicates that RRF does not actively eject mRNA from terminating ribosomes. Instead, terminating ribosomes become mobile on mRNA and ready to enter the next translation round after two distinct steps catalyzed consecutively by RF3 and RRF .

How can we express and purify recombinant Prochlorococcus marinus frr protein for functional studies?

Expression and purification of recombinant Prochlorococcus marinus frr requires careful consideration of host systems and purification strategies:

Expression System Selection:
The heterologous expression of Prochlorococcus proteins presents challenges due to their AT-rich genome and potential codon bias. Based on successful expression of other Prochlorococcus genes, the following approach is recommended:

  • Vector construction: Clone the frr gene using similar methods to those employed for the Pro1404 gene . PCR-amplify the frr gene from Prochlorococcus marinus genomic DNA using primers with appropriate restriction sites, and clone into an expression vector such as pTrc99A.

  • Expression host optimization: While E. coli is a common expression host, cyanobacterial hosts like Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 may provide a more compatible cellular environment for proper folding of Prochlorococcus proteins .

  • Expression cassette design: For optimal expression, place the frr gene downstream of a kanamycin resistance cassette (C.K1 or C.K3) with different promoter strengths to test expression levels .

Purification Protocol:

  • Grow transformed cells to mid-log phase

  • Induce protein expression (if using an inducible promoter)

  • Harvest cells and lyse using sonication or French press

  • Clarify lysate by centrifugation

  • Purify using affinity chromatography (if a tag was added) or ion exchange chromatography

  • Confirm purity by SDS-PAGE and functional activity by in vitro translation assays

What methods can be used to measure ribosome-recycling activity of Prochlorococcus frr?

Several methods can be employed to measure the activity of Prochlorococcus frr, adapting approaches used for E. coli RRF:

In vitro Translation System:
Assemble a complete translation system from purified components including:

  • Ribosomes (from Prochlorococcus or a suitable surrogate)

  • Initiation factors (IF1, IF2, IF3)

  • Elongation factors (EF-Tu, EF-Ts, EF-G)

  • Termination factors (RF1, RF2, RF3)

  • Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

  • tRNAs

  • mRNAs (short synthetic mRNAs encoding small peptides)

  • The purified recombinant Prochlorococcus frr protein

Kinetic Measurement Approaches:

  • Direct peptide quantification: Measure the accumulation of released peptides over time using HPLC, as demonstrated for E. coli . This approach allows calculation of the recycling time by determining the reciprocal of the slopes of the linear part of the experimental peptide accumulation curves, multiplied by the amount of active ribosomes.

  • fMet-tRNA consumption assay: Alternatively, measure the decrease in the amount of fMet-tRNA in the reaction mixture, either by HPLC analysis of the acid-insoluble fraction or by cold TCA precipitation .

  • Fluorescence-based assays: Employ fluorescently labeled mRNAs or tRNAs to track the dissociation of post-termination complexes in real-time.

How do environmental factors affect frr expression and function in Prochlorococcus marinus?

Prochlorococcus marinus inhabits a range of depths in the ocean and is subject to varying light intensities, temperatures, and nutrient availabilities. These environmental factors likely influence frr expression and function:

Nutrient Limitation Effects:
Prochlorococcus relies on interactions with heterotrophic bacteria to survive extended periods of nutrient starvation . This suggests that translation processes, including ribosome recycling, may be regulated in response to nutrient availability. Under nutrient-limited conditions, frr expression might be upregulated to maximize translational efficiency and resource utilization.

Light-Dependent Regulation:
As a photosynthetic organism, Prochlorococcus experiences diurnal cycles that affect its metabolism. Preliminary research indicates that:

  • During high light conditions, when photosynthesis is active, translation rates increase, potentially requiring enhanced ribosome recycling activity.

  • During low light or dark periods, translation may slow down, possibly reducing the demand for frr activity.

Temperature Effects:
Temperature influences enzyme kinetics and ribosome structural dynamics. For Prochlorococcus frr, which has evolved in relatively constant temperature environments, temperature sensitivity may differ from that of E. coli frr.

The optimal temperature for Prochlorococcus growth and protein function is typically lower than for E. coli. This suggests that Prochlorococcus frr may have maximal activity at temperatures around 20-25°C rather than the 37°C optimum for E. coli proteins.

How can site-directed mutagenesis be used to identify critical residues in Prochlorococcus frr?

Site-directed mutagenesis represents a powerful approach for identifying functionally important residues in Prochlorococcus frr:

Experimental Strategy:

  • Target selection: Based on sequence alignment with other bacterial RRFs and available structural information, identify conserved residues likely to be involved in:

    • Ribosome binding

    • Interaction with EF-G

    • Structural stability

  • Mutagenesis approach: Use PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis to create a library of frr variants with single amino acid substitutions.

  • Expression and purification: Express and purify each variant using the same protocol as for the wild-type protein.

  • Functional assays: Test each variant in the in vitro translation system to measure:

    • Ribosome recycling rate

    • Binding affinity to ribosomes

    • Interaction with EF-G

Data Analysis Approach:
Compare the activity of each mutant to wild-type frr to identify residues essential for function. Classify mutations into categories based on their effects:

Effect CategoryRecycling ActivityRibosome BindingEF-G InteractionStructural Integrity
Type ISeverely decreasedMaintainedMaintainedMaintained
Type IIModerately decreasedDecreasedMaintainedMaintained
Type IIIMaintainedMaintainedDecreasedMaintained
Type IVDecreasedMaintainedMaintainedCompromised

This classification can help distinguish between residues involved in different aspects of frr function.

What control experiments should be included when studying frr function in Prochlorococcus?

Robust control experiments are essential for reliable interpretation of frr functional studies:

Essential Control Experiments:

  • System validation controls:

    • Complete translation system without frr (negative control)

    • Complete translation system with E. coli RRF (positive control)

    • Verification that peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis doesn't occur in the absence of release factors

  • Factor-dependency controls:

    • Titration of EF-G concentrations to determine the dependency of frr function on EF-G

    • Assays with and without RF3 to assess synergistic effects

    • GDP vs. GTP comparison to confirm GTP requirement

  • Specificity controls:

    • Non-specific proteins at equivalent concentrations

    • Heat-denatured frr to confirm that activity requires the native protein structure

    • Testing activity with ribosomes from different species to assess specificity

  • Rate measurement controls:

    • Measurements at different time points to ensure linearity

    • Multiple independent preparations of components to ensure reproducibility

    • Different methods of measuring recycling (direct peptide quantification vs. fMet-tRNA consumption)

How can isotope labeling be used to study ribosome recycling in Prochlorococcus?

Isotope labeling techniques provide powerful tools for studying ribosome recycling in Prochlorococcus at both the cellular and molecular levels:

Single-Cell Level Analysis:
Using methods similar to those employed in other Prochlorococcus studies , combine fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) with nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (NanoSIMS) to study translation at the single-cell level:

Molecular Level Analysis:
For detailed mechanistic studies of frr function:

  • Labeled component preparation: Prepare ribosomes, frr, or EF-G with specific isotope labels (e.g., ¹⁵N, ¹³C) for NMR studies or mass spectrometry.

  • Interaction mapping: Use cross-linking with isotopically labeled components followed by mass spectrometry to identify interaction sites between frr and the ribosome.

  • Real-time assays: Develop assays using labeled components to track the dynamics of recycling in real-time, potentially revealing intermediates in the process.

How should kinetic data from ribosome recycling assays be analyzed?

Primary Data Analysis:
For experiments measuring peptide accumulation or fMet-tRNA consumption over time:

  • Recycling time calculation: Calculate the recycling time as the reciprocal of the slope of the linear part of the experimental curves multiplied by the amount of active ribosomes . For example, in the E. coli system:

    • Recycling time without RF3 and RRF: ~40 seconds

    • With RRF alone: ~15 seconds

    • With RF3 alone: ~28 seconds

    • With both RF3 and RRF: <6 seconds

  • Factor contribution assessment: Calculate the contribution of each factor by comparing recycling times under different conditions. For E. coli, subtracting the recycling time with both factors (6s) from the time with only RRF (15s) gives an estimate of 9s for the uncatalyzed reaction time for the RF3 step .

Advanced Kinetic Analysis:
For more detailed mechanistic insights:

  • Multi-step kinetic modeling: Develop models that incorporate multiple steps in the recycling process, including:

    • RF3-catalyzed step

    • RRF- and EF-G-catalyzed step

    • Subunit dissociation

    • Component release

  • Parameter estimation: Use non-linear regression to estimate rate constants for individual steps in the recycling process.

  • Sensitivity analysis: Determine which steps are most sensitive to changes in experimental conditions or mutations in frr.

What computational approaches can predict functional differences between frr proteins from different cyanobacterial species?

Computational methods offer valuable insights into frr function across different species:

Structural Bioinformatics Approaches:

  • Homology modeling: Generate structural models of Prochlorococcus frr based on crystallized RRF structures from other species.

  • Molecular dynamics simulations: Simulate the dynamics of frr-ribosome interactions under different conditions to identify key interaction sites and conformational changes.

  • Binding energy calculations: Compare predicted binding energies of frr proteins from different species to ribosomes to identify potential functional differences.

Comparative Genomics and Evolution:

  • Phylogenetic analysis: Construct phylogenetic trees of frr proteins across cyanobacteria and correlate sequence changes with ecological niches.

  • Co-evolution analysis: Identify residues in frr that co-evolve with interacting partners (e.g., EF-G, ribosomal proteins) to predict interaction sites.

  • Selection pressure analysis: Calculate dN/dS ratios across the frr sequence to identify residues under purifying or positive selection.

Data Integration and Prediction:

  • Environmental adaptations: How differences relate to the ecological niche of each species

  • Growth rate correlations: How frr sequence features correlate with optimal growth rates

  • Efficiency vs. accuracy tradeoffs: Whether sequences suggest optimization for speed or accuracy in translation

How can understanding Prochlorococcus frr advance our knowledge of marine microbial ecology?

Research on Prochlorococcus frr has broader implications for understanding marine microbial ecology:

Ecological Energy Efficiency:
Prochlorococcus has evolved in extremely nutrient-limited environments and relies on interactions with heterotrophic bacteria for survival during nutrient starvation . Understanding how its translation machinery, including frr, is optimized for energy efficiency can provide insights into the ecological strategies of the most abundant photosynthetic organism on Earth.

Adaptations to Oligotrophic Environments:
Prochlorococcus has evolved high-affinity nutrient transporters, such as the Pro1404 glucose transporter with a Ks value in the nanomolar range (123.4 nM) , reflecting adaptation to low nutrient availability. Similarly, its translation machinery, including frr, likely shows adaptations for function in nutrient-poor conditions.

Community Interactions:
The dependency of Prochlorococcus on heterotrophic bacteria suggests that translation processes may be regulated in response to community signals. Understanding how ribosome recycling responds to these interactions could reveal mechanisms of community regulation.

What modifications to standard protocols are necessary when working with recombinant proteins from Prochlorococcus?

Working with Prochlorococcus proteins requires specific protocol adaptations:

Expression System Considerations:

  • Codon optimization: Prochlorococcus has an AT-rich genome, requiring codon optimization for expression in standard hosts like E. coli.

  • Alternative expression hosts: Consider cyanobacterial hosts like Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 for expression of Prochlorococcus proteins, as demonstrated for the Pro1404 gene .

  • Promoter selection: Test different promoter strengths (e.g., C.K1 with moderate activity and C.K3 with strong activity) to optimize expression levels.

Purification Adaptations:

  • Buffer composition: Incorporate higher salt concentrations in buffers to reflect the marine environment of Prochlorococcus.

  • Temperature considerations: Perform purification steps at lower temperatures (4-15°C) to maintain stability of proteins adapted to oceanic temperatures.

  • Storage conditions: Test stability under different storage conditions, as proteins from Prochlorococcus may have different stability profiles compared to mesophilic proteins.

Activity Assay Modifications:

For functional assays, conditions should be adjusted to reflect the native environment of Prochlorococcus:

  • Salt concentration: Test activity across a range of salt concentrations, typically higher than for freshwater or terrestrial bacteria.

  • Temperature range: Assay activity at temperatures mimicking the oceanic environment (15-25°C).

  • pH optimization: Determine the optimal pH for activity, which may differ from that of E. coli proteins.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.