Recombinant Protein AaeX (aaeX)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to Recombinant Protein AaeX (aaeX)

Recombinant Protein AaeX (aaeX) is a 67-amino-acid protein derived from Escherichia coli (UniProt ID: B1XHL4) with applications in vaccine development and microbiological research. It is produced via heterologous expression in E. coli and typically includes an N-terminal His tag for purification. The protein is lyophilized and stored in a Tris/PBS-based buffer with trehalose to maintain stability .

Production and Purification Methodologies

AaeX is expressed in E. coli using standard recombinant protein production workflows:

  1. Cloning: The aaeX gene is inserted into a plasmid (e.g., pET21_NESG) under a T7lac inducible promoter .

  2. Induction: IPTG concentrations (0.1–1.2 mM) and temperatures (20–37°C) are optimized to balance solubility and yield .

  3. Purification:

    • IMAC (Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography): The His tag binds Ni²⁺ or Co²⁺ resin .

    • Buffer: Tris/PBS with 6% trehalose (pH 8.0) .

ParameterOptimal ConditionImpact
IPTG0.3–0.6 mMMaximizes soluble protein yield
Temperature27–32°CReduces inclusion body formation
Host StrainBL21(DE3)Common for His-tagged proteins

Applications in Vaccine Development

  • Surface antigen: Target for neutralizing antibodies .

  • Immune modulator: Stimulation of T-cell responses or antibody production .

A study by Creative Biolabs highlights AaeX’s use in a recombinant Salmonella vaccine, though specific efficacy data remain unpublished .

Research Challenges and Limitations

  1. Low Expression Efficiency:

    • E. coli strains like BL21(DE3) often struggle with heterologous protein expression due to codon bias or translation initiation inefficiencies .

    • Codon optimization (e.g., replacing rare codons like AGG/AGA for arginine) may improve yield .

  2. Stability and Storage:

    • Lyophilized AaeX requires reconstitution with deionized water and storage at -20°C/-80°C to prevent degradation .

    • Repeated freeze-thaw cycles are discouraged .

  3. Functional Characterization:

    • No peer-reviewed studies directly link AaeX to enzymatic activity or virulence mechanisms.

    • Structural data (e.g., X-ray crystallography) are absent, limiting mechanistic insights.

Future Directions

  1. Structural Analysis:

    • Use cryo-EM or NMR to elucidate AaeX’s 3D structure and interaction sites.

  2. Vaccine Optimization:

    • Combine AaeX with adjuvants (e.g., QS-21) to enhance immunogenicity, as seen in MPXV vaccine trials .

  3. Host Strain Engineering:

    • Leaky E. coli strains (e.g., X-press) may improve extracellular protein recovery, reducing purification costs .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, we are happy to accommodate any specific format requirements. Please indicate your preferred format in the order notes, and we will fulfill your request.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchase method and location. For specific delivery timeframes, please consult your local distributors.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. If dry ice shipment is required, please contact us in advance as additional charges will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend briefly centrifuging the vial prior to opening to ensure the contents settle at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We suggest adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
The shelf life is influenced by various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein.
Generally, the shelf life of liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. For lyophilized form, the shelf life is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is necessary for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
If you have a specific tag type preference, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing the specified tag.
Synonyms
aaeX; Ecok1_32310; APECO1_3202; Protein AaeX
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-67
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Escherichia coli O1:K1 / APEC
Target Names
aaeX
Target Protein Sequence
MSLFPVIVVFGLSFPPIFFELLLSLAIFWLVRRVLLPTGIYDFVWHPALFNTALYCCLFY LISRLFV
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Protein Families
AaeX family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is Recombinant Protein AaeX (aaeX) and what is its structure?

Recombinant Protein AaeX (aaeX) is a full-length protein (67 amino acids) derived from Escherichia coli. The protein has a UniProt ID of B1XHL4 and is characterized by its hydrophobic amino acid sequence: MSLFPVIVVFGLSFPPIFFELLLSLAIFWLVRRVLVPTGIYDFVWHPALFNTALYCCLFYLISRLFV . This sequence suggests AaeX contains transmembrane domains, which aligns with challenges typically associated with membrane protein expression and purification as noted in recent literature .

Research methodologies for structural analysis typically include X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy following successful purification using affinity chromatography, particularly with His-tagged versions of the protein. When working with AaeX, researchers should consider its hydrophobic nature when designing extraction and purification protocols.

What expression systems are most suitable for producing Recombinant Protein AaeX?

Escherichia coli remains the predominant expression system for Recombinant Protein AaeX due to its cost-effectiveness, rapid growth, and established genetic tools . When working with AaeX, consider these methodological approaches:

  • Temperature optimization: Lowering culture temperature after induction can increase soluble protein expression by slowing protein synthesis and allowing proper folding .

  • Fusion tag selection: His-tagging is commonly used for AaeX , but other solubility-enhancing tags such as SUMO, TRX, or MBP might improve expression yields of functional protein .

  • Codon optimization: Since AaeX is a bacterial protein expressed in E. coli, codon bias is less problematic than with heterologous proteins, but optimization can still improve expression by 3-5 fold in some cases .

  • Expression strain selection: Consider specialized strains designed to handle membrane proteins, particularly those with enhanced membrane protein folding capacity or modified secretion pathways like the ESETEC secretion technology or TatExpress strain .

What are the optimal storage conditions for Recombinant Protein AaeX?

For long-term stability of Recombinant Protein AaeX, implement the following evidence-based storage protocol:

  • Store lyophilized powder at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt .

  • After reconstitution, add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) with 50% being the recommended default concentration .

  • Aliquot the protein solution to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, as these significantly reduce protein activity .

  • For short-term use, working aliquots may be stored at 4°C for up to one week .

This storage methodology maintains protein integrity by preventing aggregation and denaturation that commonly affect recombinant proteins during freeze-thaw cycles.

How should Recombinant Protein AaeX be reconstituted for experimental use?

Follow this methodological approach for optimal reconstitution of AaeX:

  • Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to bring contents to the bottom .

  • Reconstitute the lyophilized protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL .

  • Allow complete dissolution by gentle mixing rather than vortexing to prevent protein denaturation.

  • For long-term storage, add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% before aliquoting and freezing .

The reconstitution buffer (Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose, pH 8.0) is designed to maintain protein stability. If changing buffer conditions for specific experimental requirements, use dialysis or buffer exchange columns to gradually transition to the new buffer while monitoring protein stability.

What purification methods are most effective for Recombinant Protein AaeX?

For His-tagged Recombinant Protein AaeX, implement this methodological purification workflow:

  • Primary capture: Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using Ni-NTA or Co2+ resins to capture the His-tagged protein .

  • Intermediate purification: Ion-exchange chromatography, selecting the appropriate resin based on the protein's calculated isoelectric point. For AaeX, which likely has a calculated pI near neutral pH, both cation and anion exchange options should be tested at pilot scale to determine optimal binding .

  • Polishing step: Size exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates and achieve >90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE .

To minimize endotoxin contamination, consider incorporating an anion-exchange step specifically designed to remove DNA and lipopolysaccharide impurities from the feed .

How does the His-tagging of Recombinant Protein AaeX affect its structure and function?

The N-terminal His-tag used in commercially available Recombinant Protein AaeX can impact structural and functional properties through several mechanisms:

  • Solubility effects: His-tags can increase solubility of membrane proteins like AaeX by masking hydrophobic regions, but may interfere with native membrane insertion.

  • Metal ion interference: The His-tag's affinity for divalent metal ions (such as Zn2+, Co2+, Ni2+) may interfere with functional assays, particularly if AaeX interacts with metal ions as part of its native function.

  • Structural perturbation: For small proteins like AaeX (67 amino acids), the His-tag (typically 6-10 amino acids) represents a significant proportion of the total sequence and may affect tertiary structure.

Methodological approach to address these concerns:

  • Compare tagged and tag-cleaved versions using functional assays relevant to AaeX

  • Employ circular dichroism spectroscopy to assess secondary structure differences

  • Use tag cleavage systems (TEV protease, Factor Xa) if the tag interferes with function

  • Consider C-terminal tagging as an alternative if N-terminal tagging disrupts function

What are the challenges in optimizing expression yields of Recombinant Protein AaeX in E. coli?

Optimizing AaeX expression in E. coli requires addressing several challenges typical of membrane proteins:

  • Toxicity and growth inhibition: Overexpression of membrane proteins like AaeX can lead to cell toxicity and reduced yields .

    Methodological solution: Implement controlled expression systems with tunable promoters rather than strong constitutive promoters. The use of strains with enhanced membrane protein folding capacity can mitigate toxicity.

  • Inclusion body formation: Hydrophobic regions in AaeX may promote aggregation.

    Methodological solution: Lower induction temperature (16-25°C), co-express with molecular chaperones, or use fusion tags that enhance solubility (SUMO, MBP, TRX) .

  • Carbon metabolism optimization:

    Methodological solution: Implement diverse carbon and nitrogen sources and consider acetate metabolism knockout strains that redirect E. coli carbon fluxes, which has shown up to 5-fold increase in protein production in recent studies .

  • Secretion pathway optimization:

    Methodological solution: Leverage specialized secretion systems like ESETEC technology or the TatExpress strain, which has demonstrated delivery of up to 5.4 g/L of recombinant proteins to the periplasm .

How can design of experiments (DOE) be applied to optimize purification of Recombinant Protein AaeX?

Design of experiments (DOE) provides a systematic framework for optimizing multiple parameters simultaneously in protein purification. For AaeX purification, implement this methodological approach:

DOE has been shown to effectively define all aspects of chromatographic separation with greater confidence, including optimal purification conditions for high throughput and yield, best resin combinations, and cost-effective process parameters .

What downstream processing strategies minimize endotoxin contamination in Recombinant Protein AaeX preparations?

Endotoxin contamination is a critical concern when producing recombinant proteins in E. coli for research applications. For AaeX, implement this comprehensive downstream processing strategy:

  • Primary recovery optimization: The E. coli X-press strain has demonstrated significant advantages over traditional BL21(DE3), including 3.5-fold lower endotoxin load after primary recovery .

  • Anion exchange chromatography: Implement anion exchange chromatography specifically to remove endotoxins, which are negatively charged. Studies have shown this can reduce endotoxin levels significantly while maintaining protein yield .

  • Two-phase extraction: Consider aqueous two-phase partitioning as an alternative or complementary technique to chromatography for endotoxin removal .

  • Membrane adsorbers: High-performance tangential flow filtration combined with membrane chromatography offers an efficient approach for endotoxin removal, particularly for larger scale preparations .

Comparative analysis of downstream processing strategies has shown that implementing these approaches can result in endotoxin reduction to levels below 0.5 EU/mg while maintaining protein activity and yield .

How do post-translational modifications affect the functionality of Recombinant Protein AaeX?

E. coli-expressed Recombinant Protein AaeX lacks eukaryotic post-translational modifications (PTMs), which may impact its functionality in certain research applications. Consider these methodological approaches:

  • Assessment of required PTMs: Determine if AaeX requires specific PTMs for your research application by comparing E. coli-expressed protein with versions expressed in eukaryotic systems.

  • Engineering E. coli for PTMs: Recent advances have enabled E. coli to perform simple glycosylation and other PTMs:

    • Engineered strains with transferred N-glycosylation systems from Campylobacter jejuni

    • Modified strains with enhanced disulfide bond formation capability

  • Alternative expression systems if PTMs are critical:

    • Yeast systems for simple glycosylation patterns

    • Mammalian or insect cell systems for complex PTMs

  • PTM simulation strategies:

    • Chemical modification methods for adding phosphate groups or glycans

    • In vitro enzymatic modification using purified PTM enzymes

Recent studies have shown that PTM machinery in E. coli can be modified through genetic engineering to produce proteins with specific modifications, though further research is needed to establish these systems for industrial production of therapeutic proteins .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.