The compound "Recombinant Protochlamydia amoebophila 30S ribosomal protein S7 (rpsG)" refers to a specific protein, ribosomal protein S7 (rpsG), derived from the bacterium Protochlamydia amoebophila, which has been produced using recombinant DNA technology .
Protochlamydia amoebophila is an intracellular bacterium belonging to the Chlamydiae phylum . These bacteria are known for their parasitic lifestyle, often residing within other cells, such as amoebae . Ribosomes are essential cellular components responsible for protein synthesis, and ribosomal proteins like S7 are crucial for ribosome structure and function . Recombinant production involves synthesizing the protein in a host organism (often E. coli) after introducing the gene encoding the protein .
Ribosomal protein S7 (rpsG) is a component of the 30S ribosomal subunit, which is essential for protein synthesis in bacteria . The 30S subunit binds to messenger RNA (mRNA) and transfer RNA (tRNA) to translate the genetic code into proteins . S7 plays a crucial role in the assembly and stabilization of the 30S subunit, as well as in the accuracy of translation .
Protochlamydia amoebophila employs unique strategies to acquire energy from its host cell . It possesses nucleotide transporters (NTTs) that facilitate the import of ATP from the host's cytoplasm . This energy parasitism is crucial for the survival and replication of Protochlamydia within the host cell . Studies have identified and characterized several NTTs in P. amoebophila, including PamNTT1, PamNTT2, PamNTT3, and PamNTT5 . These transporters exhibit different substrate specificities and transport mechanisms, reflecting the complex energy requirements of the bacterium .
Chlamydia trachomatis, a related bacterium, uses partner-switching mechanisms (PSMs) to regulate its development cycle between infectious elementary bodies (EB) and replicative reticulate bodies (RB) . These PSMs involve anti-sigma factors and anti-anti-sigma factors that control the availability of sigma factors, which in turn regulate gene transcription . Disrupting these mechanisms can significantly reduce infectious progeny production, suggesting that they are potential targets for novel therapeutics .
Research indicates that Chlamydiae have contributed genes to plants, particularly those related to plastid function . This suggests an ancient evolutionary relationship between Chlamydiae and plants, where gene transfer has played a role in shaping the genomes of both organisms .
KEGG: pcu:pc0208
STRING: 264201.pc0208
Protochlamydia amoebophila is an obligate intracellular bacterial endosymbiont that thrives within free-living amoebae, particularly Acanthamoeba species . It belongs to the phylum Chlamydiae but differs from pathogenic chlamydial species by establishing long-term relationships with its amoebal host .
The significance of P. amoebophila's rpsG protein stems from several factors:
As a core ribosomal protein, rpsG is essential for translation in all bacteria
It provides insights into evolutionary relationships between environmental chlamydiae and pathogenic species
Studying rpsG can improve our understanding of ribosome assembly and function in obligate intracellular bacteria
P. amoebophila has a distinct developmental cycle similar to other chlamydiae, making its ribosomal proteins important models for understanding translation regulation during different developmental stages
The evolutionary position of P. amoebophila, confirmed through phylogenetic analysis of 44 ribosomal proteins including rpsG, places it within the family Parachlamydiaceae , making its ribosomal components valuable for comparative studies across the chlamydial lineage.
Several expression systems have been documented for recombinant P. amoebophila proteins:
E. coli Expression System:
Most commonly used due to rapid growth and high protein yields
Various E. coli strains are suitable, with BL21(DE3) frequently employed
Expression vectors such as pET16b (adding N-terminal His tags) have been successfully used
IPTG induction (typically 0.8-1.0 mM) is standard for protein expression
Yeast Expression System:
Alternative system for proteins that may be toxic or improperly folded in E. coli
Can provide eukaryotic post-translational modifications if required
Expression protocol example from research (adapted from the search results):
Clone the gene of interest into an appropriate expression vector (e.g., pET16b)
Transform into E. coli BL21(DE3)
Grow in LB medium with appropriate antibiotics
Induce expression with IPTG (1 mM) at room temperature
Purify using affinity chromatography (e.g., HisTrap columns)
This approach has been successfully used for expressing various P. amoebophila proteins including putative inclusion membrane proteins .
Optimizing expression of recombinant P. amoebophila rpsG requires careful consideration of multiple parameters. Based on published protocols for similar proteins and studies of recombinant protein expression:
Key Parameters for Optimization:
Research has shown that simulated microgravity (SMG) conditions can significantly enhance recombinant protein production in E. coli, with increases of 15.3-52.4% in expression efficiency at different induction temperatures . This approach could be considered for difficult-to-express proteins like those from obligate intracellular bacteria.
A systematic experimental design approach is recommended:
Perform small-scale expression tests varying multiple parameters
Analyze protein solubility and yield using SDS-PAGE
Scale up using optimal conditions
Verify protein functionality through activity assays
Verifying both structural integrity and functional activity of recombinant P. amoebophila rpsG requires multiple complementary approaches:
Structural Integrity Assessment:
SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting:
Mass Spectrometry:
Peptide mass fingerprinting confirms protein identity
Intact protein mass analysis verifies full-length expression
Can detect post-translational modifications or truncations
Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopy:
Analyzes secondary structure content
Compares with expected α-helical and β-sheet composition
Thermal denaturation studies assess stability
Functional Verification:
RNA Binding Assays:
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) with 16S rRNA fragments
Filter binding assays to determine binding affinity constants
Fluorescence anisotropy to measure interaction kinetics
Ribosome Assembly Assays:
In vitro reconstitution of 30S subunits with and without rpsG
Sedimentation velocity analysis to monitor assembly intermediates
Cryo-EM visualization of assembly states
Translation Assays:
Cell-free translation systems supplemented with recombinant rpsG
Poly(U)-directed poly(Phe) synthesis to test functionality
Comparison with native ribosomal preparations
When characterizing recombinant proteins from P. amoebophila, researchers have successfully used immunofluorescence analysis with specific antibodies to verify correct folding and epitope presentation , suggesting this approach could be adapted for rpsG characterization as well.
P. amoebophila, like other chlamydiae, has a biphasic developmental cycle consisting of elementary bodies (EBs) and reticulate bodies (RBs) . Studying rpsG throughout this cycle requires specialized techniques:
Isolation and Purification Approaches:
Developmental Stage-Specific Isolation:
Stage-Specific Expression Analysis:
Experimental Protocol for Developmental Stage Separation:
Harvest infected Acanthamoeba cells
Disrupt cells by freeze-thawing (dry ice/ethanol bath followed by 55°C water bath)
Remove cell debris by centrifugation (3,400 × g, 10 min, 4°C)
Concentrate bacteria by high-speed centrifugation (50,000 × g, 40 min, 4°C)
Resuspend in SPG buffer (750 g/L sucrose, 5.2 g/L KH₂PO₄, 23 g/L NaHPO₄·7H₂O, 7.5 g glutamic acid)
Separate EBs from RBs using percoll density gradient ultracentrifugation (10,000 × g, 1h)
Analyzing rpsG Function:
Metabolic Activity Correlation:
Protein Localization Studies:
Immunofluorescence microscopy with anti-rpsG antibodies
Co-localization with known stage-specific markers
Immuno-electron microscopy for precise subcellular localization
Genetic Manipulation Approaches:
Research has demonstrated that P. amoebophila EBs are not metabolically inert as previously thought, but maintain respiratory activity and can metabolize D-glucose . This metabolic activity may involve translation, making ribosomal proteins like rpsG potentially active during the infectious EB stage.
Comparative analysis of rpsG across bacterial species reveals important evolutionary insights:
Sequence and Structural Comparison:
| Species | Protein Length | Key Features | Similarity to P. amoebophila rpsG |
|---|---|---|---|
| P. amoebophila | 156-179 aa* | rRNA binding domain, essential for assembly | Reference |
| E. coli | 179 aa | Well-characterized, binds 16S rRNA, contacts mRNA and tRNA | Moderate similarity (~50-60%)* |
| C. trachomatis | 157 aa | Pathogenic chlamydia, obligate intracellular | Higher similarity (~70-80%)* |
| S. tropica | 156 aa | Marine actinobacterium | Lower similarity (~40-50%)* |
*Estimated based on typical conservation patterns for ribosomal proteins
Functional Differences:
rRNA Binding Specificity:
Each species' rpsG is adapted to bind its own 16S rRNA
Conservation in binding motifs despite sequence divergence
Species-specific interaction with translation factors
Involvement in Host-Pathogen Interactions:
Pathogenic chlamydiae may utilize ribosomal proteins differently
P. amoebophila has evolved for long-term symbiosis with amoebae
E. coli rpsG functions in a free-living context
Expression Patterns:
Differential expression during developmental cycles
Response to stress conditions varies between species
Regulation mechanisms may differ significantly
Methodological Approach for Comparative Analysis:
Multiple sequence alignment using MUSCLE or CLUSTAL
Homology modeling based on known ribosomal structures
Binding site prediction and conservation analysis
Heterologous complementation experiments
Structural studies (X-ray crystallography or Cryo-EM)
In E. coli, transcriptomic analysis revealed that ribosomal protein genes (including rpsG) and RNA polymerase genes are significantly upregulated under certain conditions like simulated microgravity , suggesting complex regulation of translation machinery that may differ in P. amoebophila due to its obligate intracellular lifestyle.
Investigating protein-protein interactions (PPIs) for P. amoebophila rpsG presents several unique challenges due to the organism's biology:
Major Challenges:
Obligate Intracellular Lifestyle:
Complex Developmental Cycle:
Differential protein expression between EBs and RBs
Stage-specific interactions may be missed in bulk analyses
Temporal dynamics of interactions during development
Limited Genetic Tools:
Transformation systems not well established
Difficulty in creating tagged versions in native context
Challenging to verify interactions in vivo
Methodological Solutions:
Heterologous Expression Systems:
Express P. amoebophila rpsG and potential partners in E. coli
Use yeast two-hybrid or bacterial two-hybrid systems
Apply split reporter systems (luciferase, GFP) for visualization
In vitro Reconstitution:
Purify recombinant proteins individually
Perform co-immunoprecipitation with purified components
Use label-free techniques like isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)
Chemical Crosslinking Approaches:
Apply crosslinkers to infected amoeba cells
Identify crosslinked complexes by mass spectrometry
Verify specific interactions with targeted approaches
Advanced Microscopy Techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy for co-localization studies
FRET/FLIM for detecting proximities in fixed samples
Single-molecule tracking in live infected cells (challenging)
Experimental evidence from Chlamydiaceae suggests that ribosomal proteins may have non-canonical functions beyond translation. For example, some ribosomal proteins in pathogenic chlamydiae interact with host cell components, potentially modulating host processes . Similar interactions might exist for P. amoebophila rpsG, making interaction studies particularly valuable.
P. amoebophila shows distinct metabolic adaptations related to its endosymbiotic lifestyle that may influence rpsG function and recombinant expression:
Metabolic Characteristics of P. amoebophila:
Energy Parasitism:
Host-Independent Metabolism:
Nutrient Acquisition:
Implications for rpsG Function:
Translation Regulation:
Energy availability may regulate ribosome activity
Potential non-canonical functions under nutrient limitation
Adaptation to intracellular niche may alter translation dynamics
Protein Synthesis in EBs:
Considerations for Recombinant Expression:
Codon Optimization:
P. amoebophila has different codon usage than E. coli
Codon optimization recommended for expression
Consider using Rosetta strains for rare codons
Post-Translational Modifications:
May require specific conditions to replicate native state
Consider expression in eukaryotic systems if modifications suspected
Verify protein modifications with mass spectrometry
Functional Assessment:
Test activity under different energy conditions
Compare with metabolically active vs. inactive states
Evaluate interaction with nucleotide transporters
Research has shown that unlike other chlamydiae, P. amoebophila can establish long-term relationships with its amoeba host , suggesting potential adaptations in translation machinery to support this lifestyle. The metabolic features of P. amoebophila EBs are critical for maintaining infectivity , indicating important connections between metabolism, translation, and the chlamydial developmental cycle.
Based on successful purification strategies for other P. amoebophila proteins and standard protocols for ribosomal proteins:
Detailed Purification Protocol:
Researchers have successfully used HisTrap purification columns (HiTrap HP; GE Healthcare) for purifying recombinant P. amoebophila proteins , indicating this approach is suitable for rpsG as well.
Several complementary methods can be employed to study RNA-protein interactions involving rpsG:
Quantitative Binding Assays:
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA):
Incubate labeled RNA fragments with increasing concentrations of purified rpsG
Separate bound and unbound RNA by native PAGE
Quantify band shifts to determine binding constants
Use competition assays to assess specificity
Filter Binding Assay:
Incubate labeled RNA with rpsG protein
Pass through nitrocellulose filter (retains protein and protein-bound RNA)
Wash and quantify retained radioactivity
Plot binding curve to determine affinity constants
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR):
Immobilize either RNA or protein on sensor chip
Flow partner molecule over surface
Measure real-time association and dissociation
Determine kinetic parameters (kon, koff, KD)
Structural and Functional Analysis:
RNA Footprinting:
Treat RNA-protein complexes with structure-sensitive reagents
Identify protected regions by primer extension or sequencing
Map interaction sites at nucleotide resolution
UV Crosslinking:
Irradiate RNA-protein complexes with UV light
Digest RNA leaving crosslinked nucleotides
Identify crosslinked residues by mass spectrometry
Map interaction sites at amino acid resolution
In vitro Translation Assays:
Reconstitute translation system with and without rpsG
Measure translation efficiency of reporter mRNAs
Assess effects of mutations in rpsG or target RNAs
Research with E. coli S7 has shown that similar experimental approaches can be used to study RNA binding. For example, it has been demonstrated that S7 uses the same determinants to bind 16S rRNA and its messenger RNA , suggesting comparable studies could be informative for P. amoebophila rpsG.
Genetic and Molecular Approaches:
Heterologous Complementation:
Generate temperature-sensitive E. coli rpsG mutants
Complement with wild-type and mutant P. amoebophila rpsG variants
Assess growth rescue at non-permissive temperatures
Evaluate translation fidelity using reporter systems
Transformation of Related Organisms:
Introduce mutant rpsG constructs into genetically tractable relatives
Evaluate phenotypic effects on growth and translation
Apply findings to interpret P. amoebophila rpsG function
Ribosome Reconstitution:
Purify 30S ribosomal components from E. coli
Reconstitute subunits with wild-type or mutant P. amoebophila rpsG
Assess assembly efficiency and functionality in translation
Analytical Approaches:
Structure-Function Prediction:
Generate homology models of wild-type and mutant rpsG
Simulate RNA binding with molecular dynamics
Predict functional impacts based on structural changes
Guide experimental design for validation
Biochemical Characterization:
Express and purify mutant rpsG variants
Compare RNA binding affinities and specificities
Assess protein stability and folding
Measure interactions with other ribosomal components
The difficulty in genetic manipulation of P. amoebophila necessitates creative approaches. For example, researchers studying C. trachomatis ribosomal proteins have used fusion proteins with reporter tags to assess functionality , suggesting similar approaches could be adapted for P. amoebophila rpsG.
Several cutting-edge technologies hold promise for advancing research on P. amoebophila rpsG:
Next-Generation Sequencing Applications:
Ribosome Profiling:
Maps ribosome positions on mRNAs with nucleotide precision
Can be applied to infected amoebae to study translation landscapes
May reveal roles of rpsG in regulating translation during development
Challenges include separating host and bacterial signals
CLIP-seq (Crosslinking Immunoprecipitation-Sequencing):
Identifies RNA binding sites of specific proteins
Could map rpsG binding sites across the transcriptome
May uncover non-canonical targets beyond rRNA
Requires development of specific antibodies or tagged constructs
Structural Biology Advances:
Cryo-Electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM):
Near-atomic resolution of ribosome structures
Could visualize P. amoebophila ribosomes in different states
May reveal unique structural features of rpsG in context
Technical challenges include purifying intact ribosomes
Integrative Structural Biology:
Combines multiple data types (crosslinking, EM, modeling)
Could predict rpsG interactions within complete ribosome
Allows study of dynamic processes during translation
Requires specialized computational approaches
Emerging Genetic Technologies:
CRISPR Interference in Host Cells:
Target host factors that interact with bacterial translation
Indirectly study rpsG function through host perturbation
May reveal host-pathogen interfaces important for translation
Circumvents need for direct bacterial genetic manipulation
Synthetic Biology Approaches:
The development of improved systems for genetic manipulation of obligate intracellular bacteria would significantly advance this field. Recent work on genome reduction and redesign suggests that systematic approaches to understanding essential gene functions could provide valuable insights into ribosomal protein functions across bacterial species.
Research on P. amoebophila rpsG has potential implications across multiple fields:
Evolutionary Biology:
Insights into ribosome evolution across diverse bacterial lineages
Understanding adaptations for intracellular lifestyles
Mapping the transition from environmental to pathogenic chlamydiae
Revealing conserved vs. lineage-specific features of translation machinery
Molecular Biology of Host-Microbe Interactions:
Potential roles of ribosomal proteins in host-symbiont communication
Mechanisms of translation regulation during developmental cycles
Contribution to metabolic synchronization between host and symbiont
Adaptation of translation machinery to specialized niches
Biotechnology Applications:
Improved recombinant protein expression systems
Enhanced understanding of translational engineering principles
Novel antimicrobial targets focusing on unique features of bacterial translation
Potential for synthetic biology applications based on chlamydial components
P. amoebophila represents an important evolutionary link between environmental and pathogenic chlamydiae . Studying its ribosomal proteins can provide unique perspectives on how translation machinery evolves during the transition from free-living to obligate intracellular lifestyles. Additionally, the metabolism of P. amoebophila EBs challenges the traditional view of the infectious stage as metabolically inert , suggesting broader implications for understanding bacterial dormancy and persistence.
Researchers working with P. amoebophila rpsG can access information from several specialized resources:
Protein and Genome Databases:
UniProt:
Contains curated protein sequences and functional annotations
P. amoebophila rpsG entry with sequence and predicted features
Cross-references to other databases and literature
NCBI Genome:
Complete genome sequence of P. amoebophila UWE25
Gene annotations and genomic context of rpsG
Comparative genomic tools for analysis
Protein Data Bank (PDB):
3D structures of ribosomal proteins including homologous S7 proteins
Structural templates for homology modeling
Visualization tools for structural analysis
Specialized Chlamydial Resources:
ChlamDB:
Dedicated to genomics of Chlamydiae
Comparative analysis tools
Integration of functional data
ChlamBase:
Chlamydial genome database
Metabolic pathway information
Gene expression data when available
Recombinant Protein Resources:
Commercial Suppliers:
Addgene:
Repository for plasmids and genetic tools
May contain useful vectors for chlamydial protein expression
Community-contributed resources
These resources collectively provide comprehensive information to support research on P. amoebophila rpsG, from sequence analysis to structural studies and recombinant production.
Several research networks and collaborative groups focus on Protochlamydia and related organisms:
International Society for Chlamydia Research:
Regular conferences and workshops
Community standards and resources
Networking opportunities with experts
Environmental Chlamydiae Research Network:
Focus on non-pathogenic chlamydial species
Collaborative projects on evolution and ecology
Shared resources and protocols
Intracellular Pathogens Research Consortium:
Broader focus including various obligate intracellular bacteria
Comparative approaches across different bacterial groups
Technology development for challenging organisms
Symbiosis Model Systems Network:
Studies host-microbe interactions in diverse systems
Includes environmental chlamydiae as models
Interdisciplinary approaches to symbiosis
Engaging with these networks can provide access to specialized expertise, unpublished protocols, and collaborative opportunities for researchers studying P. amoebophila rpsG.