Protochlamydia amoebophila is an obligate intracellular bacterium, part of the Chlamydiae, known for its ability to infect amoebae . Within Protochlamydia amoebophila, the Recombination protein RecR (recR) is a component involved in DNA repair and genetic recombination, crucial for maintaining genomic stability and adaptation . Due to the fastidious nature of Protochlamydia amoebophila, research often involves using recombinant forms of its proteins, produced in more tractable hosts like E. coli . Recombinant RecR proteins are utilized in biochemical assays, structural studies, and to generate specific antibodies for research purposes .
Protochlamydia amoebophila exhibits unique characteristics:
It establishes a long-term relationship with its host, where both the bacteria and amoebae multiply in a synchronized manner .
Its developmental cycle within Acanthamoeba takes 96 hours, which is slightly longer than some other chlamydiae .
It undergoes major transcriptional shifts during its developmental cycle, similar to other Chlamydiae .
Protochlamydia amoebophila EBs (elementary bodies) exhibit metabolic activity, supporting appeals for further research into their functions . During replication, amino acids and pyruvate serve as the main carbon sources . Genes involved in amino acid degradation are highly expressed early and mid-cycle, providing substrates for protein synthesis . Pyruvate dehydrogenase genes (pdhABC) are upregulated early and at midcycle, which convert pyruvate to acetyl coenzyme A, a precursor for fatty acid biosynthesis .
To produce recombinant Protochlamydia amoebophila proteins, the gene of interest (e.g., recR) is cloned into an expression vector and introduced into E. coli . Protein expression is then induced using isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) . The recombinant protein is then purified for use in downstream applications, such as antibody production or functional studies . For example, recombinant full-length Protochlamydia amoebophila UPF0365 protein Pc1737, a protein with unknown function, has been produced in E. coli with a His-tag for purification purposes .
During infection, Protochlamydia amoebophila exhibits three main temporal classes of gene expression: early, mid, and late genes . This regulation is similar to that observed in Chlamydiaceae . A significant number of genes are differentially regulated upon entry and during early developmental events, indicating the need for adjustment when transitioning to the intracellular environment .
Functional studies of Protochlamydia amoebophila proteins, including RecR, help to elucidate their roles during the infection process. For example, researchers analyze the specificity of sera and egg yolks using Western blot analysis of E. coli expressing the respective proteins . Immunofluorescence analysis can also yield distinct signals for antibodies against inclusion membrane proteins (Incs) .
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Organism | Protochlamydia amoebophila |
| Protein | Recombination protein RecR (recR) |
| Function | DNA repair and genetic recombination |
| Host | Acanthamoeba castellanii |
| Developmental Cycle | 96 hours |
| Recombinant Production Host | E. coli |
| Inducer | Isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) |
| Carbon Sources During Replication | Amino acids and pyruvate |
| Gene Expression | Early, mid, and late genes |
KEGG: pcu:pc1724
STRING: 264201.pc1724
RecR protein in P. amoebophila functions as a critical component of the RecFOR pathway, which mediates homologous recombination and DNA repair processes. While not directly studied in P. amoebophila, RecR typically forms complexes with other recombination proteins to facilitate the loading of RecA onto single-stranded DNA at gaps or breaks. In chlamydial organisms like P. amoebophila that undergo a complex developmental cycle, DNA repair mechanisms are particularly important during the transition between developmental forms and during genome replication . The protein likely plays a crucial role in maintaining genomic integrity during the bacterium's intracellular replication phase within amoeba hosts.
The expression pattern of RecR in P. amoebophila appears to follow the biphasic transcriptional program observed in chlamydial species. Based on RNA sequencing studies of P. amoebophila during infection of its Acanthamoeba host, DNA recombination and repair genes typically show increased expression during the replicative phase . RecR would likely be categorized as a "mid-cycle" gene, with peak expression occurring around the time of bacterial replication within the inclusion (approximately 16 hours post-infection in related chlamydial systems) . This expression pattern aligns with the protein's presumed role in maintaining genomic integrity during active DNA replication and cell division.
For laboratory production of recombinant P. amoebophila RecR, E. coli-based expression systems have proven effective for similar chlamydial proteins. The established protocol involves:
Cloning the recR gene (excluding any signal sequences) into an expression vector with an inducible promoter
Transforming the construct into an E. coli expression strain
Inducing protein expression with 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at room temperature
Purifying the protein using affinity chromatography (often with a His-tag system)
This approach has been successfully applied to other P. amoebophila proteins and provides good yields of soluble, functional protein suitable for biochemical and structural studies .
When purifying recombinant P. amoebophila RecR, researchers should be aware of several common challenges:
Protein solubility: RecR contains both hydrophilic and hydrophobic regions that can affect solubility. Expression at lower temperatures (16-25°C) rather than the standard 37°C often improves protein solubility.
Protein stability: RecR functions as part of a multi-protein complex in vivo, and the isolated protein may exhibit reduced stability. Addition of stabilizing agents such as glycerol (5-10%) and reducing agents (1-5 mM DTT) to purification buffers helps maintain protein integrity.
Functional verification: Assessing the DNA-binding activity of purified RecR is essential to confirm proper folding. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays using single-stranded DNA substrates serve as a reliable functional test.
Commercial sources of the protein are available for researchers without access to protein expression facilities , though these may be cost-prohibitive for large-scale studies.
P. amoebophila undergoes a developmental cycle similar to but distinct from pathogenic chlamydiae, with some key differences that may influence RecR function:
Single-cell inclusions: Unlike Chlamydiaceae members, P. amoebophila remains in single-cell inclusions and establishes a long-term relationship with its host . This suggests that RecR may play a role in maintaining genomic stability during prolonged host association.
Synchronized replication: P. amoebophila multiplies in synchrony with its amoeba host , which may require specialized regulation of DNA recombination and repair processes coordinated by RecR.
Developmental transitions: The transition between elementary bodies (EBs) and reticulate bodies (RBs) involves significant reorganization of the bacterial cell, including DNA condensation and decondensation. RecR likely participates in resolving DNA structures during these transitions.
Metabolic shifts: P. amoebophila exhibits a biphasic metabolism, switching from energy parasitism during early infection to glucose-based ATP production in later stages . These metabolic shifts may coincide with changes in DNA recombination activity mediated by the RecFOR pathway.
Studying protein-protein interactions involving RecR in P. amoebophila presents unique challenges due to the obligate intracellular lifestyle of the organism. The following methodological approaches are recommended:
| Method | Application | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial two-hybrid | Initial screening of potential interaction partners | Can be performed in E. coli; doesn't require chlamydial cultures | May miss interactions dependent on chlamydial-specific factors |
| Co-immunoprecipitation | Validation of interactions in native context | Captures physiologically relevant interactions | Requires antibodies against RecR and development of genetic tools for P. amoebophila |
| Fluorescence microscopy | Localization during developmental cycle | Can visualize RecR distribution in relation to DNA and other cellular structures | Requires specificity controls and optimal fixation methods |
| Crosslinking mass spectrometry | Identification of interaction interfaces | Provides structural insights into protein complexes | Technically challenging; requires specialized equipment |
For researchers aiming to study RecR interactions, we recommend initially producing antibodies against recombinant RecR protein, as has been successfully done for P. amoebophila inclusion membrane proteins . These antibodies can then be used for immunoprecipitation studies from infected Acanthamoeba cells at different stages of the developmental cycle.
The relationship between genome replication and RecR function in P. amoebophila is multifaceted:
Genome copy number: Studies in related chlamydial species have shown that genome copy number influences developmental transitions and bacterial morphology . Since RecR participates in homologous recombination, its activity may vary with genome copy number during the P. amoebophila developmental cycle.
Replication stress: When DNA replication is impaired in chlamydiae, cells exhibit enlargement and defects in division . RecR likely plays a critical role in managing replication stress through its DNA repair functions.
Developmental checkpoints: Genome replication in chlamydiae serves as a checkpoint for inclusion expansion and RB-to-EB conversion . RecR may participate in signaling pathways that coordinate these processes with DNA recombination and repair status.
DNA damage response: During intracellular growth, chlamydiae face various sources of DNA damage, including host-derived reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. RecR's activity in homologous recombination provides a mechanism to repair such damage without halting replication.
Researchers studying these relationships should consider using synchronized infection systems and molecular tools to monitor RecR activity simultaneously with genome replication status throughout the developmental cycle.
While the specific structure of P. amoebophila RecR has not been determined, comparative sequence analysis with characterized RecR proteins suggests several distinguishing features:
N-terminal domain: This domain typically contains a helix-hairpin-helix motif involved in DNA binding. In P. amoebophila RecR, this domain likely retains the core structural elements but may contain insertions that influence DNA substrate specificity.
C-terminal domain: The C-terminal region contains the dimerization interface and contributes to interactions with other recombination proteins (RecF, RecO). Variations in this region could influence the composition and stability of recombination complexes in P. amoebophila.
Walker A motif: RecR proteins contain a nucleotide-binding motif that influences protein function. Subtle differences in this region could affect how P. amoebophila RecR responds to the unique nucleotide concentrations within the inclusion environment.
To definitively characterize these structural features, researchers should pursue crystal structure determination of purified recombinant P. amoebophila RecR, potentially in complex with DNA substrates or partner proteins.
RNA sequencing studies have revealed that P. amoebophila exhibits distinct metabolic phases during infection of Acanthamoeba hosts . The potential relationships between these metabolic shifts and RecR function include:
Energy demands: DNA recombination and repair processes require ATP. During the initial energy parasitism phase, limited ATP availability may restrict RecR-mediated repair activities to essential functions only.
Nucleotide pools: The switch to glucose-based metabolism later in infection likely influences nucleotide pool sizes and composition, which in turn affects RecR-dependent recombination efficiency.
Redox state: Metabolic changes alter the cellular redox environment, potentially affecting the oxidation state of RecR and its partner proteins, modulating their activities.
Synchronization with host: The coordination between host sugar metabolism and bacterial metabolic shifts suggests that RecR activity may be regulated to align DNA repair capabilities with nutrient availability.
To investigate these connections experimentally, researchers should examine RecR expression and activity in P. amoebophila under conditions that alter metabolic states, such as glucose supplementation or metabolic inhibitor treatment.
The obligate intracellular lifestyle and limited genetic manipulation options for P. amoebophila require alternative approaches to study RecR function:
Heterologous expression systems: Express P. amoebophila RecR in genetically tractable bacteria like E. coli with RecR mutations to assess functional complementation.
Cell-free systems: Reconstitute RecR function in vitro using purified components to study DNA binding, protein interactions, and biochemical activities.
Inhibitor studies: Identify small molecule inhibitors of RecR from model organisms and test their effects on P. amoebophila development within amoeba hosts.
Protein delivery methods: Use protein transduction domains or cell-penetrating peptides to introduce modified RecR proteins into infected amoebae to compete with endogenous protein function.
Immunological approaches: Develop antibodies against RecR that can both visualize the protein and potentially interfere with its function when introduced into permeabilized infected cells.
For comprehensive analysis of RecR dynamics during the P. amoebophila developmental cycle, we recommend the following experimental design:
| Time Point | Analysis Methods | Expected Findings | Controls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-2 hours (initial uptake) | Immunofluorescence microscopy, RT-qPCR | Low RecR expression, primarily in EBs | Uninfected amoebae, antibody specificity controls |
| 8-12 hours (early replication) | Immunofluorescence, RT-qPCR, protein extraction | Increasing RecR expression, localization near bacterial DNA | Other DNA replication proteins as comparators |
| 24-48 hours (active replication) | All previous plus ChIP-seq if feasible | Peak RecR expression, association with specific DNA regions | Metabolic labeling to identify replicating bacteria |
| 72+ hours (RB to EB conversion) | All previous methods | Decreasing RecR expression, changing localization pattern | EB-specific markers |
This approach should be coupled with synchronization of infection to reduce heterogeneity in bacterial developmental stages. For synchronization, we recommend centrifugation-assisted infection of amoebae followed by washing steps to remove non-internalized bacteria.
Several high-priority research directions for P. amoebophila RecR include:
Development of genetic manipulation systems that would allow targeted mutation of recR to directly assess its function in vivo.
Comparative studies between RecR proteins from environmental chlamydiae (like P. amoebophila) and pathogenic chlamydiae to understand evolutionary adaptations in DNA repair systems.
Investigation of RecR's potential role in the exceptionally stable symbiotic relationship between P. amoebophila and Acanthamoeba.
Exploration of RecR as a potential target for compounds that could disrupt the chlamydial developmental cycle, which may have broader implications for understanding pathogenic chlamydiae.
Systems biology approaches integrating transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data to place RecR function within the broader regulatory networks of P. amoebophila.