Recombinant Pseudoderopeltis cf. bimaculata JT-2004 Pyrokinin-5

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the format we have in stock. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery time varies by purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. Request dry ice in advance for an extra fee.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute protein in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer, temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
Pyrokinin-5; FXPRL-amide; PseBi-Capa-PK
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-17
Protein Length
Cytoplasmic domain
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Pseudoderopeltis cf. bimaculata JT-2004 (Harlequin cockroach)
Target Protein Sequence
GGGGSGETSG MWFGPRL
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Myoactive.
Protein Families
Pyrokinin family
Subcellular Location
Secreted.

Q&A

What is the amino acid sequence of Pseudoderopeltis pyrokinin-5?

Based on the available data, Pseudoderopeltis foveolata pyrokinin-5 has the sequence GGGGSGETSGMWFGPRL. This 17-amino acid peptide belongs to the broader pyrokinin family of neuropeptides characterized by the conserved C-terminal FXPRLamide motif. The N-terminal region shows greater variability between species and may include additional amino acids that influence the peptide's specific biological activity in different tissues and target systems . Understanding this sequence is essential for structure-function studies and developing analogs with modified properties.

How are pyrokinins classified within neuropeptide families?

Pyrokinins belong to the broader PRXamide superfamily of neuropeptides. They typically share a conserved C-terminal FXPRLamide motif that is critical for receptor recognition. In insects, pyrokinins are encoded by two main genes: the CAPA gene that produces both periviscerokinin (PVK) peptides and CAPA-PK peptides, and the pyrokinin gene that produces additional PK peptides. These neuropeptides are further classified based on their structural characteristics and biological functions. For example, in H. halys, the pyrokinin gene encodes three PK2 peptides (PK2-1, PK2-2, and PK2-3), while the CAPA gene encodes two periviscerokinin peptides and a CAPA-DH peptide . This classification is important for understanding evolutionary relationships and functional diversification across species.

What are the primary biological functions of pyrokinin neuropeptides?

Pyrokinins are multifunctional neuropeptides that primarily regulate myotropic activity in insects and other arthropods. Research demonstrates that they stimulate muscle contractions in various tissues, particularly in feeding-related structures. For example, in ticks, pyrokinins induce dose-dependent contractions in the pharynx-esophagus tissue, suggesting a role in regulating blood feeding . Additionally, pyrokinins are involved in diuretic hormone action, pheromone biosynthesis, and various developmental processes in insects. Their functional diversity is reflected in the tissue-specific expression of their receptors, with higher expression typically observed in feeding-related tissues compared to reproductive tissues in unfed ticks . This multifunctionality makes pyrokinins important targets for understanding neuroendocrine regulation in arthropods.

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant pyrokinin-5?

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsBest For
E. coliHigh yield, simple setup, cost-effectiveLimited post-translational modificationsStructural studies, antibody production
Insect cells (Sf9)Native-like processing, proper foldingMore complex, higher costReceptor binding assays, functional studies
Mammalian cellsFull post-translational modificationsHighest complexity and costComplex functional studies, therapeutic applications

The choice should be guided by the specific research objectives and downstream applications of the recombinant peptide .

What are the optimal storage conditions for maintaining recombinant pyrokinin-5 stability?

For optimal stability, recombinant pyrokinin-5 should be stored at -20°C, and for extended storage, -80°C is recommended. To minimize degradation from freeze-thaw cycles, it is advisable to prepare working aliquots stored at 4°C for use within one week. Reconstitution should be performed in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL, with the addition of glycerol (typically 5-50% final concentration) for long-term storage . The shelf life of the liquid form is approximately 6 months at -20°C/-80°C, while the lyophilized form can maintain stability for about 12 months at the same temperatures . These storage conditions help preserve the structural integrity and biological activity of the peptide, which is crucial for experimental reproducibility and reliability in functional assays.

What reconstitution protocols ensure optimal activity of recombinant pyrokinin peptides?

To ensure optimal activity of recombinant pyrokinin peptides, follow this methodological approach:

  • Briefly centrifuge the vial prior to opening to bring contents to the bottom.

  • Reconstitute the lyophilized protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL.

  • Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (50% is commonly used as a standard).

  • Prepare small aliquots to minimize freeze-thaw cycles, which can degrade the peptide.

  • For functional assays, dilute the stock solution in appropriate physiological buffers immediately before use.

This protocol helps maintain the structural integrity and biological activity of the peptide. Researchers should verify activity using appropriate bioassays, such as receptor binding or myotropic activity assays, after reconstitution to confirm that the peptide remains functional . Additionally, avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, as these significantly reduce peptide activity and experimental reproducibility.

How can pyrokinin receptor activity be effectively measured in vitro?

Pyrokinin receptor activity can be effectively measured using cell-based functional assays with transfected cell lines expressing the receptor of interest. A methodological approach involves:

  • Generating expression vectors containing the pyrokinin receptor gene of interest

  • Transfecting insect cell lines (e.g., Sf9) using lipid-based transfection reagents like Cellfectin II

  • Establishing stable cell lines under antibiotic selection (typically using blasticidin at 10-20 μg/mL)

  • Preparing cells for functional assays by plating approximately 50,000 cells per well in black-walled, 96-well plates

  • Loading cells with calcium-sensitive fluorescent dyes (e.g., FLIPR Calcium 6 assay reagent)

  • Measuring calcium mobilization in response to various concentrations of pyrokinin peptides

This methodology allows for quantitative assessment of receptor activation, enabling the determination of EC50 values and comparison of potency between different pyrokinin peptides or analogs . The assay can be modified to study receptor pharmacology, including antagonist screening, structure-activity relationships, and signaling pathway analysis.

What in vitro assays can demonstrate the myotropic activity of pyrokinins?

To demonstrate the myotropic activity of pyrokinins, tissue contraction assays provide direct functional evidence. Based on established methodologies:

  • Dissect appropriate tissues (e.g., pharynx-esophagus in ticks) under physiological saline solution.

  • Allow the tissue to stabilize for 5 minutes in saline solution at room temperature.

  • Replace with fresh saline at controlled temperature (e.g., 26±1°C) to record baseline contractions.

  • Apply a negative control (scrambled peptide, 10 μM) and record tissue response after 3 minutes.

  • Rinse thoroughly with saline (5 times within 1 minute).

  • Apply the test pyrokinin (10 μM) or analog and record tissue response after 3 minutes.

  • For dose-response studies, test multiple concentrations (e.g., 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 μM) with rinsing between applications.

Video recording and quantification of tissue contractions provide quantitative data on pyrokinin activity. A dose-dependent increase in contractions strongly indicates biological activity. This assay has been successfully used to demonstrate that both endogenous pyrokinins and synthetic analogs like PK-PEG8 can significantly increase contractions in tick feeding tissues .

How can tissue-specific expression of pyrokinin receptors be quantified?

To quantify tissue-specific expression of pyrokinin receptors, reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) provides a reliable and sensitive approach. The methodological procedure involves:

  • Carefully dissect tissues of interest under physiological saline conditions

  • Immediately preserve tissues in RNA stabilization reagent (e.g., TRIzol)

  • Extract total RNA using standard protocols

  • Synthesize cDNA using reverse transcriptase

  • Design specific primers for the pyrokinin receptor gene and reference genes

  • Perform RT-qPCR using a fluorescent dye system (e.g., SYBR Green)

  • Normalize receptor expression to appropriate reference genes (e.g., elongation factor 1-alpha)

This approach has successfully demonstrated differential expression of pyrokinin receptors across tissues, with highest expression in feeding-related structures in ticks. For example, in R. sanguineus, pyrokinin receptor expression was 3.3-fold higher in feeding-related tissues associated with the capitulum compared to the rest of the body, while expression was lowest in reproductive tissues . This quantitative approach provides valuable insights into the physiological roles of pyrokinins in different tissues and developmental stages.

How do structural modifications of pyrokinins affect their biological activity?

Structural modifications of pyrokinins can significantly alter their biological activity, receptor selectivity, and metabolic stability. Research with pyrokinin analogs reveals several key structure-activity relationships:

  • C-terminal modifications: The C-terminal FXPRLamide motif is critical for receptor recognition and activation. Substitutions in this region typically reduce activity unless they preserve the key pharmacophore features.

  • PEGylation: The addition of polyethylene glycol (PEG) spacers, as demonstrated with the MS[PEG 8]-YFTPRLa analog, can enhance biological activity in tissue assays. This analog showed significant myotropic activity in tick feeding tissues, comparable to endogenous pyrokinins .

  • N-terminal modifications: Changes to the N-terminal region may alter receptor subtype selectivity or metabolic stability without eliminating biological activity, as the N-terminus is more variable among natural pyrokinins.

Researchers can exploit these structure-activity relationships to develop analogs with enhanced stability, receptor selectivity, or potency for specific experimental or potential therapeutic applications. Systematic modification studies combined with functional assays are essential for understanding how structural changes affect biological properties.

What approaches can be used to study cross-species conservation and divergence of pyrokinin function?

Studying cross-species conservation and divergence of pyrokinin function requires an integrated approach combining sequence analysis, receptor pharmacology, and functional assays. Key methodological approaches include:

  • Comparative genomic analysis to identify pyrokinin genes and their receptors across species

  • Multiple sequence alignment to determine conserved motifs and species-specific variations

  • Phylogenetic analysis to establish evolutionary relationships of pyrokinin systems

  • Heterologous expression of receptors from different species in standardized cell-based assays

  • Cross-species peptide testing to evaluate receptor selectivity and conservation of function

  • Comparative tissue assays to assess biological activities across different arthropod lineages

This approach has been successfully applied to study pyrokinins across tick species representing different lineages (Prostriata and Metastriata). For instance, research has shown that pharynx-esophagus tissues from both Ixodes scapularis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus respond with increased contractions to both endogenous pyrokinins and synthetic analogs . Such comparative studies provide insights into the evolutionary conservation of neuropeptide systems and help identify potential targets for species-specific interventions in pest management strategies.

What are the key considerations for designing pyrokinin receptor antagonists?

Designing effective pyrokinin receptor antagonists requires careful consideration of structural features that allow binding without activating the receptor. Key methodological considerations include:

  • Structure-based design: Utilize the conserved C-terminal FXPRLamide motif as a starting point but introduce modifications that prevent receptor activation while maintaining binding affinity.

  • Alanine scanning: Systematically replace each amino acid with alanine to identify critical residues for binding versus activation.

  • Competitive binding assays: Test candidate antagonists for their ability to displace labeled pyrokinins from their receptors without triggering signaling responses.

  • Functional antagonism testing: Evaluate the ability of candidates to block the effects of pyrokinins in calcium mobilization assays using receptor-expressing cell lines.

  • Stability optimization: Incorporate modifications that enhance metabolic stability without compromising antagonist activity, such as D-amino acid substitutions or PEGylation.

These approaches can lead to the development of tools for investigating pyrokinin receptor function in vivo and potentially therapeutic agents for controlling arthropod pests. The development of antagonists would complement the existing research on pyrokinin analogs like PK-PEG8, which has demonstrated agonist activity in tick tissues .

How are pyrokinin neuropeptides being targeted for arthropod pest management?

Pyrokinin neuropeptides represent promising targets for arthropod pest management due to their critical roles in regulating physiological processes. Research-based approaches include:

  • Receptor-based screening for selective antagonists that can disrupt feeding behavior in pest species

  • Development of peptidomimetics that can cross the cuticle and target internal receptors

  • Design of metabolically stable pyrokinin analogs that cause physiological disruption

  • RNA interference targeting pyrokinin receptor expression in pest species

The potential of this approach is supported by tissue-specific expression data showing high levels of pyrokinin receptor expression in feeding tissues of ticks . For example, research has demonstrated that pyrokinins induce contractions in the pharynx-esophagus of ticks, suggesting that disrupting this signaling pathway could interfere with blood feeding and potentially reduce pathogen transmission. As more information becomes available about species-specific differences in pyrokinin systems, increasingly selective approaches may become possible.

What methodologies are most effective for investigating pyrokinin receptor-ligand interactions at the molecular level?

Investigating pyrokinin receptor-ligand interactions at the molecular level requires sophisticated methodological approaches:

  • Homology modeling and molecular docking: Build structural models of pyrokinin receptors based on crystal structures of related GPCRs, then use docking simulations to predict binding modes of natural ligands and analogs.

  • Site-directed mutagenesis: Systematically modify specific amino acids in the receptor to identify residues critical for ligand binding and receptor activation.

  • Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET): Label receptors and ligands with fluorescent pairs to detect binding events and conformational changes in real-time.

  • Surface plasmon resonance: Measure binding kinetics and affinity constants for receptor-ligand interactions.

  • Molecular dynamics simulations: Model the dynamic interactions between receptors and ligands over time to understand the molecular basis of activation.

These approaches provide complementary information about the structural basis of receptor-ligand interactions, which is critical for rational design of more potent agonists or antagonists. Understanding these molecular details complements the functional data obtained from cell-based assays and tissue contraction studies .

What are the challenges and prospects for developing pyrokinin-based biotechnology applications?

The development of pyrokinin-based biotechnology applications faces several challenges but also offers promising prospects:

Challenges:

  • Limited stability of peptides in vivo due to proteolytic degradation

  • Difficulty in achieving delivery across biological barriers

  • Potential for cross-reactivity with related neuropeptide receptors

  • Species-specific variations in receptor pharmacology

  • Scale-up and cost-effectiveness of peptide production

Prospects:

  • Development of metabolically stable analogs through strategic modifications

  • Use of pyrokinin receptor systems as screening platforms for novel compounds

  • Creation of biosensors using immobilized receptors for environmental monitoring

  • Applications in integrated pest management strategies

  • Potential models for understanding GPCR signaling mechanisms

Addressing these challenges requires interdisciplinary approaches combining peptide chemistry, molecular biology, and physiology. Recent advances in recombinant protein expression systems and the successful development of active analogs like PK-PEG8 demonstrate progress in this field. Additionally, the detailed characterization of pyrokinin receptor expression patterns and tissue-specific responses provides a foundation for targeted applications in both basic research and applied biotechnology.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.