Recombinant Pseudomonas fluorescens ATP synthase subunit c (atpE)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Production and Expression Systems

The recombinant protein is produced via heterologous expression in E. coli:

  • Expression Host: E. coli with plasmid vectors encoding the atpE gene fused to a His tag.

  • Purification: Affinity chromatography using nickel columns to isolate the His-tagged protein .

  • Post-Production Handling: Lyophilized powder reconstituted in deionized water with glycerol (5–50%) for stability .

While Pseudomonas fluorescens itself employs ABC transporters (e.g., TliDEF) for secretion , recombinant atpE production relies on E. coli due to efficient scaling and purification .

Functional Significance in ATP Synthesis

As a core subunit of the F₀F₁ ATP synthase, atpE plays a pivotal role in:

  • Proton Translocation: Forms a c-ring (10–14 subunits) that rotates during proton movement, driving ATP synthesis .

  • Structural Integrity: Interacts with other F₀ subunits (a, b) and F₁ subunits (γ, ε) to coordinate proton flow and ATP production .

  • Drug Targeting: Mutations in atpE (e.g., Ser26Leu, Phe47Leu) confer resistance to ATP synthase inhibitors like tomatidine, highlighting its critical role .

Therapeutic Relevance

  • Antibiotic Target: ATP synthase subunit c is a validated target for small-molecule inhibitors (e.g., tomatidine derivatives) in Staphylococcus aureus and other Gram-positive bacteria .

  • Resistance Mechanisms: Mutations in atpE (e.g., Ala17Ser, Gly18Cys) reduce inhibitor binding while maintaining partial ATP synthase activity .

Comparative Analysis of Recombinant Variants

FeatureQ3K436 (RFL24351PF)C3K1F1 (RFL31843PF)
Gene SynonymPfl01_5735PFLU_6123
AA Sequence (Position 47)PheLeu
Expression VectorE. coliE. coli

Note: Variations at position 47 (Phe → Leu) may influence subunit interactions or inhibitor binding .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, we are happy to accommodate specific format requests. Please indicate your preference in the order notes, and we will fulfill your requirements to the best of our ability.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs by default. If you require dry ice shipping, please inform us in advance as additional charges will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend briefly centrifuging the vial before opening to ensure the contents settle at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We suggest adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol final concentration is 50%. Customers can use this as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life is influenced by various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, storage temperature, and the protein's inherent stability.
Generally, liquid forms have a shelf life of 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized forms have a shelf life of 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is necessary for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
The specific tag type will be determined during production. If you have a preferred tag type, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
atpE; PFLU_6123; ATP synthase subunit c; ATP synthase F(0 sector subunit c; F-type ATPase subunit c; F-ATPase subunit c; Lipid-binding protein
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-85
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Pseudomonas fluorescens (strain SBW25)
Target Names
atpE
Target Protein Sequence
METVVGLTAIAVALLIGLGALGTAIGFGLLGGKFLEGAARQPEMVPMLQVKMFIVAGLLD AVTMIGVGIALFFTFANPFVGQLAG
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
F(1)F(0) ATP synthase catalyzes the production of ATP from ADP in the presence of a proton or sodium gradient. F-type ATPases comprise two structural domains: F(1), containing the extramembraneous catalytic core, and F(0), containing the membrane proton channel. These domains are interconnected by a central stalk and a peripheral stalk. During catalysis, ATP synthesis in the F(1) catalytic domain is coupled via a rotary mechanism of the central stalk subunits to proton translocation. As a key component of the F(0) channel, subunit c plays a direct role in proton translocation across the membrane. A homomeric c-ring composed of 10-14 subunits forms the central stalk rotor element, interacting with the F(1) delta and epsilon subunits.
Database Links
Protein Families
ATPase C chain family
Subcellular Location
Cell inner membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the structure and function of ATP synthase subunit c in Pseudomonas fluorescens?

ATP synthase subunit c (atpE) in Pseudomonas fluorescens is a small hydrophobic protein that forms the c-ring in the F₀ domain of ATP synthase. This c-ring functions as a proton channel and participates in the rotary mechanism that drives ATP synthesis. The protein typically has a hairpin structure with two transmembrane α-helices connected by a polar loop. Similar to its counterpart in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the protein likely forms an oligomeric ring structure embedded in the membrane, with each c-subunit containing a proton-binding site (typically an aspartate or glutamate residue) essential for proton translocation . The structure-function relationship is critical for understanding energy transduction mechanisms in bacterial systems and has implications for both basic research and biotechnological applications.

How does recombinant P. fluorescens ATP synthase subunit c differ from native protein?

Recombinant P. fluorescens ATP synthase subunit c typically includes modifications that facilitate purification and experimental manipulation. These modifications commonly include:

FeatureNative atpERecombinant atpE
Affinity tagsAbsentOften contains His-tag or other affinity tags
Expression systemP. fluorescensTypically E. coli expression systems
Post-translational modificationsSpecies-specificMay lack native modifications
SolubilityMembrane-embeddedMay include solubilizing modifications
PurityPart of ATP synthase complex>90% purity through affinity purification

When working with recombinant versions, researchers should verify that the added elements don't significantly alter the protein's structural integrity or functional properties. Expression in heterologous systems like E. coli (similar to P. aeruginosa ATP synthase subunit a) can affect protein folding and assembly characteristics .

What are the recommended storage conditions for recombinant P. fluorescens atpE protein?

For optimal stability and activity maintenance of recombinant P. fluorescens atpE protein, implement the following storage protocol:

  • Store lyophilized protein at -20°C to -80°C for long-term storage

  • After reconstitution, store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week

  • For reconstituted protein storage beyond one week, add glycerol to a final concentration of 50% and store at -20°C or -80°C

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as they significantly decrease protein stability and activity

  • Use Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% trehalose at pH 8.0 for storage buffer composition

These conditions are extrapolated from protocols for similar ATP synthase components and should maintain protein integrity . For membrane proteins like atpE, consider adding appropriate detergents to prevent aggregation during storage.

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant P. fluorescens atpE protein?

The selection of an expression system for recombinant P. fluorescens atpE requires careful consideration of multiple factors that influence protein yield, folding, and functionality:

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsYield Expectations
E. coli BL21(DE3)High expression levels, well-established protocols, cost-effectiveMay form inclusion bodies, lacks post-translational modifications10-15 mg/L culture
E. coli C41/C43Specialized for membrane proteins, reduced toxicityLower yields than BL215-10 mg/L culture
P. fluorescensNative environment, proper foldingComplex cultivation, lower yields2-5 mg/L culture
Cell-free systemsRapid production, direct incorporation of detergentsExpensive, limited scale0.5-1 mg/mL reaction

For most research applications, E. coli expression systems represent the optimal balance between yield and functionality, similar to the approach used for P. aeruginosa ATP synthase components . When expressing in E. coli, fusion to an N-terminal His-tag facilitates purification while minimally impacting protein structure and function. For membrane proteins like atpE, specialized E. coli strains (C41/C43) often provide better results by accommodating the potential toxicity of membrane protein overexpression.

How can I optimize the purification protocol for recombinant P. fluorescens atpE?

Optimizing purification of recombinant P. fluorescens atpE requires a multi-step approach tailored to this highly hydrophobic membrane protein:

  • Membrane Solubilization:

    • Use mild detergents like n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM) at 1-2% for initial solubilization

    • Incubate solubilization mixture at 4°C for 1-2 hours with gentle rotation

    • Centrifuge at 100,000 × g for 1 hour to remove insoluble material

  • Affinity Chromatography:

    • For His-tagged constructs, use Ni-NTA resin with imidazole gradient elution (10-500 mM)

    • Maintain detergent concentration at 0.1% throughout purification

    • Include 10% glycerol in all buffers to enhance protein stability

  • Size Exclusion Chromatography:

    • Apply sample to Superdex 200 column for final purification

    • Use buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% DDM

  • Quality Control:

    • Verify purity by SDS-PAGE (should exceed 90%)

    • Confirm identity by Western blot or mass spectrometry

    • Assess oligomeric state by native PAGE or analytical ultracentrifugation

This protocol can be adapted based on specific research requirements and equipment availability. For functional studies, consider incorporating additional steps to reconstitute the protein into liposomes or nanodiscs.

What analytical methods are most informative for characterizing recombinant P. fluorescens atpE structure?

Comprehensive structural characterization of recombinant P. fluorescens atpE requires a multi-technique approach to address different structural aspects:

TechniqueInformation ProvidedSample RequirementsLimitations
Circular Dichroism (CD)Secondary structure content, thermal stability0.1-0.5 mg/mL protein in detergentLimited resolution, detergent interference
FTIR SpectroscopySecondary structure in membrane environment1-2 mg protein in lipid environmentsComplex data interpretation
NMR SpectroscopyAtomic-level structure, dynamics5-10 mg isotope-labeled proteinSize limitations, requires specialized equipment
X-ray CrystallographyHigh-resolution 3D structureWell-diffracting crystalsCrystallization challenges for membrane proteins
Cryo-EMMedium to high-resolution structure, native-like conditions2-5 mg highly pure, homogeneous sampleResolution limitations for small proteins
Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange MSSolvent accessibility, conformational dynamics50-100 μg proteinData complexity

For initial characterization, combining CD spectroscopy and FTIR provides accessible information about secondary structure content. For higher-resolution analysis, cryo-EM has emerged as particularly valuable for membrane protein complexes like ATP synthase components. When designing these experiments, ensure that the protein is maintained in a native-like environment, typically using detergent micelles, nanodiscs, or liposomes to preserve structural integrity.

How can I assess the functional integrity of recombinant P. fluorescens atpE?

Verifying the functional integrity of recombinant P. fluorescens atpE involves multiple complementary approaches since this protein functions as part of the larger ATP synthase complex:

  • Proton Translocation Assays:

    • Reconstitute purified atpE into liposomes containing pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes (ACMA or pyranine)

    • Establish a pH gradient across the membrane and monitor fluorescence changes

    • Quantify proton transport rates under varying conditions (pH, membrane potential)

  • Oligomeric Assembly Assessment:

    • Use blue native PAGE to verify formation of c-ring oligomers

    • Apply cross-linking approaches with MS analysis to confirm appropriate subunit interactions

    • Employ analytical ultracentrifugation to determine oligomeric state

  • Binding Studies with Partner Subunits:

    • Perform co-immunoprecipitation with other ATP synthase components

    • Use surface plasmon resonance to quantify binding affinities with subunits a and b

    • Apply microscale thermophoresis for interaction analysis in detergent environments

  • Reconstitution into ATP Synthase Complex:

    • Combine with other purified subunits to assess complex formation

    • Measure ATP synthesis/hydrolysis activity of reconstituted complexes

    • Compare kinetic parameters with those of native enzyme complexes

When conducting these analyses, always include appropriate controls such as well-characterized ATP synthase subunits from model organisms and known inhibitors of ATP synthase activity.

What methods can detect protein-protein interactions between atpE and other ATP synthase components?

Detecting and characterizing protein-protein interactions between atpE and other ATP synthase components requires specialized techniques suitable for membrane protein complexes:

TechniquePrincipleAdvantagesLimitationsData Output
Co-immunoprecipitationAntibody-based capture of protein complexesWorks with endogenous proteins, minimal protein modificationLow spatial resolution, potential antibody cross-reactivityQualitative binding data
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)Energy transfer between fluorophores in close proximityReal-time monitoring, works in living cellsRequires protein labeling, potential functional interferenceDistance measurements, binding kinetics
Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET)Energy transfer from luciferase to fluorophoreNo external light source needed, reduced backgroundRequires protein fusion constructsRelative interaction strengths
Bacterial Two-HybridTranscriptional activation upon protein interactionWorks with membrane proteins, in vivo assessmentFalse positives/negatives, artificial expression levelsBinary interaction data
Cross-linking Mass SpectrometryChemical crosslinking of interacting proteins with MS analysisIdentifies specific interaction sites, works with complexesTechnical complexity, challenging data analysisResidue-level interaction maps

For membrane proteins like ATP synthase components, chemical cross-linking followed by mass spectrometry analysis provides particularly valuable insights, as it can identify specific residues involved in subunit interfaces. When combined with computational modeling, these approaches can generate structural models of the assembled complex. Similar approaches have been successfully applied to study RNA-protein interactions in Pseudomonas species .

How do mutations in conserved residues of P. fluorescens atpE affect ATP synthase function?

Mutations in conserved residues of P. fluorescens atpE can profoundly impact ATP synthase function through several mechanisms:

Conserved RegionKey ResiduesEffect of MutationExperimental Observation
Proton-binding siteAsp/Glu in TM2Abolishes proton translocation>95% reduction in ATP synthesis activity
Helix-helix interfaceGly-rich motifsDisrupts c-ring assemblyDecreased oligomerization, increased protein instability
a-subunit interfacePolar residues in TM2Impairs proton transfer pathwayUncoupled ATP hydrolysis/synthesis
Lipid-interacting surfaceAromatic residuesAlters membrane embeddingReduced complex stability in native membranes

When designing mutation studies, consider using site-directed mutagenesis to systematically alter conserved residues and assess the impact on:

  • Protein expression and stability

  • Oligomeric assembly

  • Proton translocation efficiency

  • ATP synthesis/hydrolysis coupling

These mutation studies not only provide insights into structure-function relationships but also help identify potential antimicrobial target sites, as ATP synthase is essential for bacterial energy metabolism.

How do environmental factors influence the stability and function of recombinant P. fluorescens atpE?

Environmental factors significantly impact the stability and function of recombinant P. fluorescens atpE, with important implications for experimental design and data interpretation:

Environmental FactorImpact on StabilityImpact on FunctionOptimal Conditions
pHExtreme pH accelerates denaturationAffects proton binding/release kineticspH 6.5-8.0 for storage; pH gradient required for function
TemperatureThermal denaturation above 45°CTemperature-dependent activity profileStorage at 4°C short-term; -80°C long-term with cryoprotectants
Ionic strengthHigh salt disrupts electrostatic interactionsModulates proton translocation efficiency100-200 mM NaCl for storage; physiological ionic strength for function
Detergent typeHarsh detergents destabilize proteinDifferent micelle properties affect activityDDM or LMNG for stability; native lipids for function
Lipid compositionInfluences protein-lipid interactionsAffects c-ring rotation dynamicsMatch lipid composition to native bacterial membrane

Research indicates that P. fluorescens ATP synthase displays adaptations to environmental conditions that differ from those of other bacterial species. When designing experiments, carefully control and report these environmental parameters to ensure reproducibility. For long-term storage, lyophilization with appropriate protectants (e.g., trehalose) offers superior stability compared to liquid formulations .

What are the critical differences between ATP synthase subunit c from P. fluorescens and other bacterial species?

Comparative analysis reveals significant differences between ATP synthase subunit c from P. fluorescens and other bacterial species that influence both structure and function:

FeatureP. fluorescensE. coliMycobacterium spp.Functional Implication
Subunit size~80 amino acids~80 amino acids~120 amino acidsDifferent c-ring stoichiometries
c-ring stoichiometry11-13 subunits (predicted)10 subunits9 subunitsAffects bioenergetic efficiency
Proton-binding residuePredominantly AspAspGluDifferent pKa values affect proton affinity
TM helix lengthMedium lengthMedium lengthExtendedMembrane thickness adaptation
Loop regionVariableConservedExtendedSpecies-specific regulation
Inhibitor sensitivityModerate DCCD sensitivityHigh DCCD sensitivitySpecialized inhibitor targetsPharmacological targeting potential

These differences reflect evolutionary adaptations to different ecological niches and energy requirements. When designing experiments with P. fluorescens atpE, researchers should consider these species-specific characteristics rather than directly applying protocols optimized for E. coli or other model organisms. The structural and functional differences may also explain variations in antimicrobial susceptibility between these bacterial species.

How can molecular dynamics simulations enhance our understanding of P. fluorescens atpE function?

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations provide powerful insights into the dynamic behavior of P. fluorescens atpE at atomic resolution, complementing experimental approaches:

  • Proton Translocation Mechanism:

    • Simulations can reveal the detailed pathway of proton movement through the c-ring

    • Identify water molecules and amino acid side chains involved in proton transfer

    • Calculate energy barriers for proton translocation steps

  • Lipid-Protein Interactions:

    • Model interactions between atpE and specific membrane lipids

    • Identify lipid binding sites that may stabilize the c-ring structure

    • Assess the impact of membrane composition on protein dynamics

  • Conformational Dynamics:

    • Track structural changes during rotation and proton binding/release

    • Identify flexible regions and conformational states not captured in static structures

    • Calculate free energy profiles for different functional states

  • Subunit Interface Analysis:

    • Model interactions between c-subunits in the c-ring assembly

    • Characterize the interface between c-ring and a-subunit

    • Identify key residues that determine specificity of subunit interactions

Simulation TypeTime ScaleSystem SizeInformation Obtained
All-atom MD100 ns - 1 μs~100,000 atomsDetailed atomic motions
Coarse-grained MD1-10 μs~500,000 atomsLarge-scale conformational changes
QM/MM10-100 ps~1,000 QM atomsProton transfer energetics
Enhanced samplingVariableVariableEnergy landscapes, rare events

When conducting MD simulations, ensure that the starting structure accurately represents the P. fluorescens atpE protein, as structural details can significantly impact simulation results. Similar computational approaches have been successfully applied to study protein-RNA interactions in Pseudomonas species .

What are common challenges in expressing and purifying functional P. fluorescens atpE?

Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when working with recombinant P. fluorescens atpE, each requiring specific troubleshooting approaches:

ChallengeCauseSolutionPrevention
Low expression yieldToxicity to host cells, protein instabilityReduce induction temperature (16-20°C), use specialized strains (C41/C43)Optimize codon usage, use tunable promoters
Inclusion body formationHydrophobic aggregation, improper foldingInclude 0.5-1% detergent during lysis, use fusion partners (MBP, SUMO)Lower expression temperature, co-express with chaperones
Poor membrane integrationInefficient membrane targetingInclude signal sequences, optimize membrane targeting elementsUse membrane fraction for purification
Inactive proteinDenaturation during purificationInclude stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific lipids)Gentle purification conditions, avoid harsh detergents
Oligomerization issuesDisrupted c-ring assemblyCrosslinking strategies, native purification conditionsMaintain native-like environment throughout purification
Contaminant proteinsNon-specific binding during purificationIncrease imidazole in wash buffers, add secondary purification stepsOptimize binding and washing conditions

For membrane proteins like atpE, maintaining a native-like environment throughout expression and purification is crucial. Consider incorporating a reconstitution step into liposomes or nanodiscs immediately after purification to stabilize the protein. Similar approaches have been effective for other membrane proteins from Pseudomonas species, where maintaining proper folding during purification is critical for experimental success .

How can I distinguish between functional and non-functional forms of recombinant P. fluorescens atpE?

Distinguishing between functional and non-functional forms of recombinant P. fluorescens atpE requires a multi-parameter assessment approach:

  • Structural Integrity Assessment:

    • CD spectroscopy to verify secondary structure content (should show predominant α-helical signature)

    • Tryptophan fluorescence spectroscopy to assess tertiary structure (blue shift indicates proper folding)

    • SEC-MALS to confirm appropriate oligomeric state

  • Functional Assays:

    • Proton translocation assays in reconstituted systems (liposomes with pH-sensitive dyes)

    • ATP synthesis coupling when combined with other subunits

    • Inhibitor binding studies (e.g., DCCD binding to functional Asp/Glu residue)

  • Biophysical Properties:

    • Thermal stability profiling (functional protein shows cooperative unfolding)

    • Detergent/lipid binding characteristics (properly folded protein incorporates defined detergent/lipid molecules)

    • Protease resistance patterns (functional protein shows limited accessibility to specific sites)

ParameterFunctional atpENon-functional atpE
α-helical content>60%<40% or irregular
Oligomeric stateDefined c-ring (8-15 subunits)Random aggregates or monomers
Tm value50-70°C in detergent<40°C or non-cooperative melting
DCCD bindingStoichiometric bindingReduced or non-specific binding
Proton translocationGradient-dependent activityNo activity or uncoupled activity

When evaluating recombinant P. fluorescens atpE, apply these methods systematically and compare results with well-characterized reference samples whenever possible. This multi-parameter approach provides a comprehensive assessment of protein quality and functionality.

What are the best approaches for resolving data inconsistencies in P. fluorescens atpE research?

Resolving data inconsistencies in P. fluorescens atpE research requires systematic methodological approaches and careful experimental design:

  • Source of Inconsistency: Protein Preparation Variability

    • Standardize expression conditions with detailed protocols

    • Implement batch validation using SDS-PAGE, Western blot, and activity assays

    • Prepare large, homogeneous protein batches for extended study series

    • Consider chemical biotinylation or other tagging methods for tracking specific preparations

  • Source of Inconsistency: Assay Methodology Differences

    • Develop standardized assay protocols with detailed buffer compositions

    • Include internal controls and standards in each experiment

    • Perform calibration curves for quantitative measurements

    • Document equipment settings and environmental conditions

  • Source of Inconsistency: Data Analysis Approaches

    • Establish consistent analysis parameters and software versions

    • Use blind analysis when applicable to reduce bias

    • Implement statistical approaches appropriate for the data type

    • Consider developing shared analysis pipelines within research communities

  • Reconciliation Strategies:

    • Conduct head-to-head comparisons of different methods

    • Systematically vary one parameter at a time to identify critical variables

    • Employ orthogonal techniques to verify key findings

    • Collaborate with other laboratories to validate findings through inter-lab studies

When inconsistencies persist despite these approaches, consider alternative hypotheses such as different functional states of the protein, post-translational modifications, or interactions with specific lipids or other molecules that may be present in variable amounts across experiments. Documentation of all experimental conditions is crucial for resolving these types of inconsistencies, as seemingly minor variations in protocol may have significant impacts on membrane protein behavior.

How might structural studies of P. fluorescens atpE inform the development of novel antimicrobials?

Structural studies of P. fluorescens atpE offer promising avenues for antimicrobial development through several key research directions:

  • Identification of Species-Specific Binding Sites:

    • High-resolution structural analysis can reveal unique pockets or interfaces in P. fluorescens atpE

    • Comparative analysis with human ATP synthase can identify bacterial-specific regions

    • Molecular docking studies can predict selective binding compounds

  • Targeting c-ring Assembly and Stability:

    • Structural characterization of subunit interfaces may reveal targets to disrupt c-ring formation

    • Compounds that interfere with c-ring/a-subunit interaction could selectively inhibit bacterial ATP synthase

    • Small molecules that alter c-ring stability present novel antimicrobial mechanisms

  • Proton Pathway Disruption:

    • Detailed mapping of the proton translocation pathway can identify critical residues

    • Structure-based design of molecules that block proton movement without affecting human ATP synthase

    • Allosteric modulators that alter proton binding/release kinetics

  • Rational Design Based on Natural Inhibitors:

    • Structural studies of atpE bound to known inhibitors (oligomycin, DCCD) provide templates

    • Structure-activity relationship studies can guide optimization of lead compounds

    • Fragment-based approaches using structural data can identify novel chemotypes

Structural FeatureAntimicrobial StrategyAdvantageChallenge
Proton-binding siteCompetitive inhibitorsDirect blockade of functionHigh conservation with human ATP synthase
c-ring/a-subunit interfaceInterface disruptorsSpecies-specific targetingComplex structural environment
c-ring assemblyOligomerization inhibitorsNovel mechanismRequires understanding of assembly process
Allosteric sitesConformational modulatorsPotentially highly specificDifficult to identify binding sites

Future structural studies should employ integrated approaches combining X-ray crystallography, cryo-EM, and NMR with computational methods to fully characterize P. fluorescens atpE in different functional states and in complex with potential inhibitors.

What novel applications of recombinant P. fluorescens atpE are emerging in biotechnology?

Recombinant P. fluorescens atpE is finding novel applications in biotechnology that leverage its unique structural and functional properties:

  • Biosensor Development:

    • Integration of atpE into electrode systems for proton gradient detection

    • Fluorescently labeled atpE variants for monitoring membrane potential in real-time

    • Engineered atpE-based systems for detecting membrane-active compounds

  • Bionanotechnology Platforms:

    • Self-assembling c-rings as templates for nanoparticle organization

    • atpE-based rotary nanomotors powered by proton gradients

    • Engineered protein pores based on c-ring architecture for controlled ion transport

  • Drug Delivery Systems:

    • Reconstituted atpE in liposomes as pH-responsive drug release vehicles

    • Targeted delivery systems utilizing the proton-pumping capability

    • Fusion of therapeutic peptides to atpE for membrane targeting

  • Bioenergetic Engineering:

    • Optimized atpE variants with enhanced ATP synthesis efficiency

    • Integration into artificial photosynthetic systems

    • Creation of hybrid energy-generating systems combining properties from different species

Application AreaTechnologyCurrent Development StagePotential Impact
BiosensorsProton flux detectorsProof-of-conceptEnvironmental monitoring
BionanotechnologySelf-assembling protein scaffoldsEarly researchNovel materials
Drug deliverypH-responsive nanocontainersPre-clinical researchTargeted therapeutics
BioenergeticsEnhanced ATP synthesis systemsLaboratory prototypesSustainable energy

These emerging applications require interdisciplinary approaches combining protein engineering, nanotechnology, and synthetic biology. The development of optimized expression and purification protocols for functional atpE variants, as described in previous sections, provides the foundation for these biotechnological applications.

How does ATP synthase research in Pseudomonas species contribute to our understanding of bacterial evolution and adaptation?

Research on ATP synthase in Pseudomonas species provides valuable insights into bacterial evolution and adaptation through several key observations:

  • Energetic Efficiency Adaptations:

    • Variations in c-ring stoichiometry across Pseudomonas species reflect adaptations to different energy environments

    • Changes in proton-binding site residues suggest adaptations to different pH habitats

    • Membrane composition interactions point to environmental specialization

  • Regulatory Network Evolution:

    • Differences in ATP synthase gene organization between Pseudomonas species and other bacteria

    • Species-specific regulatory elements controlling ATP synthase expression

    • Co-evolution with other metabolic systems (similar to RNA degradosome evolution)

  • Horizontal Gene Transfer and Recombination:

    • Evidence of horizontal gene transfer events in ATP synthase genes

    • Mosaic structures suggesting recombination between species

    • Conservation patterns revealing evolutionary constraints on specific domains

  • Environmental Adaptation Signatures:

    • Cold-adapted Pseudomonas species show specific ATP synthase modifications

    • Clinical isolates versus environmental strains display different evolutionary patterns

    • Adaptations to oxygen limitation in biofilm-forming species

Evolutionary FeatureExample in PseudomonasComparative EvidenceAdaptive Significance
c-ring size variationSpecies-specific stoichiometryDifferent from E. coli and other modelsBalance between ATP yield and proton cost
Proton binding residuesConserved Asp in TM2Variable in extremophilespH range adaptation
Regulatory elementsatpE promoter variationsDifferent organization than in EnterobacteriaceaeNiche-specific energy regulation
Membrane interactionsSpecific lipid binding sitesVaries with membrane compositionEnvironmental membrane adaptation

This evolutionary perspective provides context for interpreting structural and functional studies of P. fluorescens atpE. Understanding these adaptations can inform both fundamental microbiology and applications in synthetic biology where ATP synthase components might be engineered for specific functions or environments.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.