Recombinant Pseudomonas putida Peptide chain release factor 1 (prfA)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction

Recombinant Pseudomonas putida Peptide Chain Release Factor 1 (prfA) refers to the engineered version of a translation termination factor in Pseudomonas putida, a Gram-negative bacterium widely used in biotechnology for heterologous protein production. While prfA itself is a critical component of bacterial translation machinery, existing research on its recombinant form in P. putida remains limited. This article synthesizes available data on P. putida’s genetic tools and translation factors, providing context for potential applications of prfA engineering.

Role of RF1 in Bacterial Translation

Peptide chain release factor 1 (RF1) recognizes stop codons (UAA and UAG) during translation termination, facilitating the release of nascent polypeptides from ribosomes. In P. putida, RF1 (prfA) is encoded by the pp_3010 gene and shares homology with RF1 proteins in other bacteria (e.g., Escherichia coli). Its function is critical for accurate translation termination, preventing read-through errors and maintaining proteome fidelity .

Genetic Engineering of P. putida for Heterologous Protein Production

P. putida is a preferred chassis for recombinant protein production due to its robust metabolic versatility and solvent tolerance . Key genetic tools include:

  • T7-like expression systems: Achieved via integration of T7 RNA polymerase (e.g., MmP1) for enhanced transcriptional control, enabling 2.5-fold higher expression of difficult-to-produce proteins .

  • Quorum sensing promoters: Auto-inducible systems like RoxS/RoxR improve expression scalability .

  • Genome reduction: Strains like EM42 (devoid of 18 non-essential genes) enhance productivity by reducing metabolic burdens .

Potential Applications of prfA Engineering

Hypothetical scenarios for recombinant prfA include:

  1. Enhancing translation termination efficiency: Modifying RF1 to recognize engineered stop codons or improve termination kinetics.

  2. Expanding codon usage: Engineering RF1 to recognize novel stop codons for expanded genetic code applications.

  3. Error-prone termination mitigation: Reducing read-through errors during heterologous protein synthesis.

Current research on P. putida focuses on secretion systems (e.g., PA1131 transporter ) and biosurfactant production , with no reports on prfA engineering.

Data Gaps and Research Opportunities

AspectStatus
prfA sequence analysisLimited to pp_3010 annotation in P. putida KT2440 genome .
Functional studiesNo experimental data on prfA engineering in P. putida literature.
ApplicationsTheoretical potential unexplored due to lack of targeted research.

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the available format, but you can request a specific format when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery time varies. Consult local distributors for specifics. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs. Request dry ice in advance (extra fees apply).
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage, buffer, temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon arrival. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
prfA; PputW619_4456; Peptide chain release factor 1; RF-1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-360
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Pseudomonas putida (strain W619)
Target Names
prfA
Target Protein Sequence
MKASLLNKLD TLQDRFEELT ALLGDAEVIS DQARFRAYSR EYSEVEPVIG AYKEWRKVQD DLEGAQALLK DADPDMREMA VEEVREAKEQ LVGLESQLQR MLLPKDPNDG RNVFLEIRAG TGGDEAAIFS GDLFRMYSRY AERRGWRLEI LSENEGEHGG YKEIIARVEG DSVYGKLKFE SGAHRVQRVP ETESQGRIHT SACTVAVLPE PDEQVAIEIN PADLRVDTYR ASGAGGQHVN KTDSAIRITH LPTGIVVECQ EERSQHKNRA RAMSWLSAKL NDMQTSAAQN AIASERKLLV GSGDRSERIR TYNYPQGRVT DHRINLTLYS LDDILAGGVD AVIEPLLAEY QADQLAALGD
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Peptide chain release factor 1 terminates translation in response to the stop codons UAG and UAA.
Database Links
Protein Families
Prokaryotic/mitochondrial release factor family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

Why is Pseudomonas putida considered an advantageous host for recombinant protein expression?

P. putida offers several distinct advantages as a host organism for recombinant protein expression, particularly for proteins like prfA. The bacterium possesses a versatile metabolism with diverse enzymatic capacities for production purposes, while maintaining a relatively "clean" metabolic background that simplifies the detection of heterologously synthesized proteins. P. putida demonstrates a high tolerance toward xenobiotics including antibiotics and organic solvents due to effective efflux systems that activate in the presence of foreign compounds. This makes it especially suitable for expression of proteins that may be toxic to other host systems .

Additionally, P. putida is compatible with GC-rich genes from bacterial clades like actinobacteria or myxobacteria, providing an excellent platform for expressing genes that might be challenging in other systems. The bacterium offers a wealth of cofactors particularly for oxidoreductases that may be required for proper protein folding and function .

What are the key genetic characteristics of P. putida that make it suitable for prfA expression?

P. putida possesses several genetic characteristics making it suitable for heterologous protein expression, including prfA. The bacterium has a robust transcriptional machinery capable of processing diverse promoters, allowing researchers flexibility in designing expression systems. For optimal expression, codon optimization must be considered as P. putida has specific codon preferences that differ from other common expression hosts.

The genome of P. putida strains like KT2440 has been fully sequenced and well-characterized, facilitating precise genetic modifications for enhancing protein expression. The bacterium contains natural plasmids and genomic integration sites that can be leveraged for stable expression. Furthermore, P. putida demonstrates excellent genetic stability, maintaining introduced genetic constructs without significant mutation or deletion over multiple generations, which is critical for reliable protein production in laboratory settings .

How does the expression of recombinant prfA in P. putida compare to expression in E. coli systems?

While E. coli remains the most common bacterial expression system, P. putida offers distinct advantages for certain proteins including prfA. P. putida typically grows more slowly than E. coli but demonstrates superior tolerance to environmental stresses and toxic compounds. This stress tolerance is particularly beneficial when expressing proteins that may cause metabolic burden or toxicity.

For prfA expression specifically, P. putida's robust translational machinery and natural ability to handle proteins involved in translation processes may result in better folding and functionality compared to E. coli systems. Temperature modulation during expression phase has been shown to dramatically impact yields in P. putida - for example, a 1000-fold increase in yield was observed for certain recombinant proteins when expression temperature was lowered from 30°C to 16°C after induction .

P. putida also offers excellent post-translational modification capabilities for certain protein types, though this may be less relevant for prokaryotic proteins like prfA. The choice between E. coli and P. putida should be guided by protein characteristics, required yields, and downstream applications.

What are the optimal vectors and promoter systems for expressing recombinant prfA in P. putida?

For optimal expression of recombinant prfA in P. putida, researchers should consider several vector and promoter options:

Vector Selection:

  • Broad-host-range vectors based on RSF1010 or pBBR1 backbones provide stable maintenance in P. putida

  • Chromosomal integration vectors targeting the trpE gene have demonstrated success for stable, long-term expression

  • Shuttle vectors compatible with both E. coli (for cloning) and P. putida (for expression) streamline the workflow

Promoter Systems:

  • The m-toluate-inducible Pm promoter has shown high efficiency for controlled expression, with dramatic yield improvements when combined with temperature modulation

  • The tac promoter provides strong constitutive expression and has been successfully used for recombinant protein production in P. putida

  • Native P. putida promoters such as Ppro may provide more predictable expression patterns due to host compatibility

Research has demonstrated that choice of promoter system is critical, with significant variation in expression levels observed between different systems. Expression levels often require balancing between maximal yield and potential toxicity effects from overexpression.

What fluorescence-based detection methods can be used to monitor recombinant P. putida expressing prfA in environmental samples?

Fluorescence-based detection of recombinant P. putida in environmental samples can be achieved through several sophisticated approaches:

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH):
A dual-probe FISH approach has been successfully developed for detecting recombinant P. putida in complex environmental matrices like the wheat rhizosphere. This method employs:

  • A species-specific probe targeting P. putida 23S rRNA (labeled with Cy3 fluorophore)

  • A gene-specific probe targeting the recombinant gene of interest (labeled with Alexa647 fluorophore)

This dual-labeling strategy allows simultaneous confirmation of both bacterial species identity and presence of the recombinant gene. Optimization of hybridization temperature is crucial for specificity - typically around 46°C with testing against appropriate positive and negative controls .

Confocal Microscopy Analysis:
Following FISH labeling, confocal laser scanning microscopy enables visualization of labeled cells in environmental samples. This approach allows:

  • Detection of individual bacterial cells within complex matrices

  • Confirmation of successful gene expression through fluorescence signal strength

  • Spatial distribution analysis of colonization patterns

For optimal results, samples should be processed to minimize autofluorescence from plant or soil materials, using appropriate washing steps and controls to distinguish specific signals from background .

How can researchers design primers for PCR detection of recombinant prfA genes in P. putida?

Designing effective primers for PCR detection of recombinant prfA genes in P. putida requires careful consideration of several factors:

  • Target Sequence Selection:

    • Design primers spanning the junction between the P. putida genome and the inserted prfA gene to specifically detect recombinant strains

    • Alternatively, target unique portions of the expression cassette (e.g., promoter-gene junction or gene-terminator junction)

    • Analyze the complete prfA sequence for regions of high uniqueness compared to native P. putida genes

  • Primer Design Parameters:

    • Optimal primer length: 18-25 nucleotides

    • GC content: 45-55% for stable binding

    • Melting temperature (Tm): 58-62°C with <2°C difference between primer pairs

    • Avoid secondary structures, self-complementarity, and 3' complementarity

  • Specificity Verification:

    • Perform in silico analysis against P. putida genomes to identify potential cross-reactivity

    • Test primers against pure cultures of both recombinant and wild-type P. putida strains

    • Include closely related Pseudomonas species as negative controls

When analyzing environmental samples, nested PCR approaches may improve detection sensitivity, though care must be taken to minimize contamination risks. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) can be employed for estimating recombinant P. putida population sizes in complex environments .

How can the prfA gene be modified to enhance protein release efficiency in P. putida expression systems?

Enhancing protein release efficiency through prfA modifications requires strategic engineering approaches:

Codon Optimization Strategies:
Codon optimization of the prfA gene specifically for P. putida can significantly improve translation efficiency. Analysis of highly expressed P. putida genes reveals distinct codon preferences compared to other bacterial systems. Customized algorithms accounting for P. putida-specific codon bias should be employed rather than generic bacterial optimization.

Strategic Mutations:
Targeted mutations in prfA can enhance stop codon recognition efficiency:

  • Mutations in domain 1 can improve binding to class I release factors

  • Modifications to the GGQ motif may enhance peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis activity

  • Engineering the specificity domain can fine-tune stop codon recognition patterns

Expression System Design:
Coupling prfA modifications with appropriately engineered expression systems yields optimal results:

  • Temperature-responsive promoters allow modulation of expression conditions

  • Two-phase culture systems leverage P. putida's solvent tolerance for increased yields

  • Co-expression with chaperones may enhance proper folding and activity

Performance evaluation should include comprehensive assays measuring both protein quantity and quality to ensure modifications don't compromise functional integrity.

What approaches can be used to study the spatial distribution of recombinant P. putida expressing prfA in plant rhizosphere?

Studying spatial distribution of recombinant P. putida in the rhizosphere requires sophisticated imaging and sampling techniques:

Multi-probe FISH with Confocal Microscopy:
This approach enables visualization of bacterial cells directly on root surfaces:

  • Species-specific probe (e.g., P. putida 23S rRNA-targeted, Cy3-labeled) identifies the bacterium

  • Gene-specific probe (e.g., Alexa647-labeled) confirms presence of the recombinant gene

  • Co-localization of signals in composite images provides definitive identification

Optimization of hybridization conditions is critical, with temperature adjustment (typically 46°C) to maximize specificity while minimizing background. Post-hybridization washes should be designed to remove partially bound probes .

Sampling Strategies for Spatial Distribution:
Systematic sampling of different root zones provides insights into colonization patterns:

  • Root apex (zone of elongation) versus mature root sections

  • Root hair zones versus non-hair regions

  • Lateral root emergence sites versus primary root surfaces

For comprehensive analysis, combine direct visualization methods with culture-based approaches by extracting root biofilm and growing colonies on selective media to confirm viability and expression stability .

The spatial analysis should be conducted at multiple time points after inoculation to track colonization dynamics and potential changes in expression patterns over time.

What metabolic engineering approaches can optimize prfA expression and function in P. putida?

Optimizing prfA expression and function in P. putida through metabolic engineering requires a systems biology approach addressing multiple cellular aspects:

Precursor Supply Engineering:

  • Enhance amino acid biosynthesis pathways, particularly for residues abundant in prfA

  • Optimize ATP generation to support the energetically demanding process of protein synthesis

  • Engineer cofactor availability for proper prfA function

Competing Pathway Reduction:

  • Delete or downregulate polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) synthesis pathways that compete for metabolic resources

  • Minimize production of secondary metabolites that may divert resources

  • Engineering strain backgrounds with reduced protease activity to enhance protein stability

Stress Response Modulation:

  • Overexpress chaperones to assist protein folding under expression conditions

  • Engineer membrane components to enhance solvent tolerance during high-level expression

  • Modify efflux systems to prevent accumulation of potentially toxic intermediates

Growth Condition Optimization:
Temperature modulation during the expression phase has demonstrated dramatic impacts on heterologous protein yields in P. putida. For instance, lowering temperature from 30°C to 16°C after induction resulted in a 1000-fold increase in production of certain recombinant proteins .

These approaches should be implemented in combination rather than isolation, as metabolic optimization typically requires addressing multiple bottlenecks simultaneously.

What are the most common challenges in detecting recombinant P. putida in environmental samples and how can they be addressed?

Detecting recombinant P. putida in environmental samples presents several challenges that require specific methodological solutions:

Challenge: Background Fluorescence from Environmental Matrices

  • Solution: Implement appropriate sample processing protocols including washing steps to remove soil particles

  • Solution: Use multiple fluorophores with distinct emission spectra to distinguish specific signals

  • Solution: Include appropriate negative controls (uncolonized roots, wild-type bacteria) for establishing background threshold levels

Challenge: Low Target Abundance in Complex Communities

  • Solution: Employ enrichment steps on selective media before molecular detection

  • Solution: Utilize nested PCR approaches to increase detection sensitivity

  • Solution: Optimize probe concentration and hybridization conditions for FISH to improve signal-to-noise ratio

Challenge: Inhibitors in Environmental Samples

  • Solution: Add bovine serum albumin (BSA) or other blocking agents to PCR reactions

  • Solution: Use specialized DNA extraction kits designed for environmental samples

  • Solution: Include internal amplification controls to identify inhibition

Challenge: Distinguishing Live vs. Dead Cells

  • Solution: Combine FISH with viability stains like propidium monoazide (PMA)

  • Solution: Target mRNA rather than DNA for detection of actively expressing cells

  • Solution: Implement culture-based verification methods alongside molecular detection

How can researchers analyze and interpret data from FISH experiments detecting recombinant P. putida in complex environments?

Analysis and interpretation of FISH data for recombinant P. putida detection requires rigorous methodological approaches:

Image Acquisition and Processing:

  • Capture multiple z-stack images (typically 0.5-1 μm increments) to ensure complete visualization of bacterial cells

  • Apply consistent threshold settings across all samples to enable quantitative comparisons

  • Implement deconvolution algorithms to improve signal clarity in thick specimens

Quantitative Analysis Approaches:

  • Cell counting: Enumerate cells displaying both target signals (e.g., Cy3 for species, Alexa647 for recombinant gene)

  • Signal intensity analysis: Measure fluorescence intensity as potential indicator of expression levels

  • Spatial distribution analysis: Map colonization patterns across different root zones

Statistical Validation:

  • Include appropriate negative controls (non-inoculated samples, wild-type strains)

  • Process multiple biological replicates (minimum n=3) to account for natural variation

  • Apply appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution (typically non-parametric tests for environmental samples)

Interpretation Guidelines:

  • Co-localization of species-specific and gene-specific signals confirms presence of recombinant strain

  • Comparison with pure culture controls provides reference for signal intensity interpretation

  • Correlation with culture-based quantification validates detection sensitivity

Consistent application of these analytical approaches ensures reliable data interpretation across different experimental conditions.

What statistical methods are most appropriate for analyzing colonization patterns of recombinant P. putida expressing prfA?

Analyzing colonization patterns of recombinant P. putida requires appropriate statistical approaches to address the complex, non-normally distributed data typically generated from such experiments:

Descriptive Statistics for Colonization Intensity:

  • Report median and interquartile range rather than mean/standard deviation due to non-normal distribution

  • Use box plots or violin plots to visualize distribution patterns across different root zones

  • Consider log transformation of count data to address skewed distributions

Comparative Statistical Tests:

  • Non-parametric tests are generally most appropriate:

    • Mann-Whitney U test for comparing two conditions

    • Kruskal-Wallis test with post-hoc comparisons for multiple conditions

    • Friedman test for repeated measures across time points

  • When comparing colonization across different root zones, paired statistical approaches may be more appropriate to account for plant-to-plant variation

Spatial Statistics:

  • Ripley's K function to analyze clustering patterns of bacterial cells

  • Getis-Ord Gi* analysis to identify hotspots of colonization

  • Spatial autocorrelation indices to quantify distribution patterns

Multivariate Approaches:

  • Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to identify patterns across multiple variables

  • Redundancy Analysis (RDA) to correlate colonization patterns with environmental variables

  • PERMANOVA to test for significant differences in community composition when examining impact on native microbiome

These statistical approaches should be selected based on specific research questions and experimental design, with careful consideration of assumptions underlying each test.

How might synthetic biology approaches be applied to develop novel functions for recombinant P. putida expressing modified prfA variants?

Synthetic biology offers promising avenues for developing novel functions through engineered prfA variants in P. putida:

Expanded Genetic Code Applications:

  • Engineer prfA variants to recognize non-canonical stop codons, enabling site-specific incorporation of non-standard amino acids

  • Develop orthogonal translation systems where modified prfA proteins function independently of the host's native translation machinery

  • Create conditional protein expression systems based on engineered stop codon suppression mechanisms

Biosensor Development:

  • Design prfA fusion proteins containing reporter domains that signal in response to specific environmental conditions

  • Engineer conditional termination systems where prfA activity is modulated by small molecules or environmental signals

  • Develop cell-free detection systems utilizing modified prfA proteins for environmental monitoring

Metabolic Circuit Engineering:

  • Create genetic circuits with prfA variants as regulatory components to control metabolic pathway expression

  • Develop feedback-responsive expression systems where product accumulation triggers termination through prfA-mediated mechanisms

  • Design synthetic operons with programmed translational control through engineered stop codon recognition

These approaches leverage P. putida's robust metabolism and environmental adaptability, potentially enabling applications ranging from bioremediation to fine chemical production with sophisticated control mechanisms.

What emerging technologies could enhance detection and monitoring of recombinant P. putida in environmental applications?

Several emerging technologies show promise for advanced detection and monitoring of recombinant P. putida in environmental settings:

Advanced Imaging Technologies:

  • Raman microspectroscopy enables label-free identification of bacteria based on their chemical composition, potentially distinguishing recombinant strains from native populations

  • Super-resolution microscopy techniques like STORM or PALM could allow visualization of individual protein molecules within bacterial cells, enhancing sensitivity

  • Light sheet microscopy offers rapid 3D imaging of larger environmental samples with reduced photobleaching, enabling long-term monitoring

Molecular Sensing Innovations:

  • CRISPR-based detection systems utilizing Cas12 or Cas13 could provide highly specific detection of recombinant genetic sequences

  • Nanopore sequencing technologies enable real-time DNA analysis in field settings, potentially allowing on-site monitoring

  • Digital PCR offers absolute quantification without standard curves, improving detection of low-abundance targets

Integrated Monitoring Approaches:

These technologies could significantly enhance both the sensitivity and practicality of monitoring recombinant strains in complex environmental matrices, facilitating responsible deployment in applications such as bioremediation.

How can computational modeling help predict the behavior of recombinant P. putida expressing prfA in complex environmental systems?

Computational modeling approaches offer powerful tools for predicting recombinant P. putida behavior in environmental systems:

Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling:

Agent-Based Models for Colonization Dynamics:

  • Individual-based models simulating bacterial movement, attachment, and growth on root surfaces

  • Models incorporating chemotaxis and biofilm formation capture complex colonization patterns

  • Multi-scale models linking cellular processes to population-level behaviors

Machine Learning Approaches:

  • Predictive models trained on experimental data can identify key variables influencing colonization success

  • Neural networks integrating genomic, transcriptomic, and environmental data to predict gene expression patterns

  • Feature importance analysis to identify critical environmental factors affecting recombinant strain performance

Ecological Network Models:

  • Food web models predicting interactions between recombinant P. putida and indigenous microbiota

  • Network analysis identifying potential keystone species affected by introduced recombinant strains

  • Stability analysis assessing potential community shifts following introduction

These computational approaches can guide experimental design, reducing the need for extensive trial-and-error testing and facilitating risk assessment for environmental applications of recombinant strains.

Table 1: Comparison of Expression Systems for Recombinant Proteins in P. putida

Promoter SystemInduction MethodExpression LevelTemperature SensitivityApplications for prfA Expression
Pm (XylS)m-toluateHighSignificant (16°C optimal)Controlled expression with potential 1000-fold yield increase at reduced temperature
PtacIPTGMedium-HighModerateConstitutive expression with predictable yields
T7IPTGVery HighHighMaximum yield but potential toxicity
PsalSalicylateMediumLowGradual induction with minimal stress response
PalkBAlkanesMedium-LowLowSpecialized applications requiring substrate-specific induction

Table 2: Fluorescence Probe Specifications for Detecting Recombinant P. putida

Probe TargetFluorophoreExcitation (nm)Emission (nm)Optimal Hybridization Temperature (°C)Detection Sensitivity
P. putida 23S rRNACy35505704610³ cells/mL
Recombinant geneAlexa6476506684610⁴ copies/mL
Universal bacterial 16SFITC4905254610² cells/mL

Table 3: Common Challenges and Solutions in Recombinant P. putida Research

ChallengePotential CausesSolutionsSuccess Indicators
Low expression yieldCodon bias, metabolic burdenCodon optimization, temperature reduction to 16°C post-induction10-1000 fold increase in target protein
Protein insolubilityImproper folding, inclusion body formationCo-expression with chaperones, fusion tags>80% protein in soluble fraction
Plasmid instabilitySelection pressure, metabolic burdenChromosomal integration, balanced promoter strength<5% plasmid loss after 50 generations
Detection limits in environmental samplesBackground fluorescence, inhibitorsDual-probe FISH, optimized sample processingReliable detection at 10³ cells/g soil
Inconsistent colonizationCompetition with indigenous microbes, plant defense responsesPre-cultivation of plants in controlled conditions, selective mediaConsistent recovery of >10⁵ CFU/g root

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.