Recombinant Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase (argC) is an enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of arginine, an essential amino acid for bacterial growth and survival. This enzyme catalyzes the reduction of N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate to N-acetyl-glutamate semialdehyde, a crucial step in the arginine biosynthesis pathway. Despite the lack of specific literature directly referencing "Recombinant Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase (argC)," understanding its role requires insight into arginine biosynthesis and genetic manipulation in Pseudomonas species.
The arginine biosynthesis pathway in bacteria involves several key enzymes, starting with N-acetylglutamate synthetase (encoded by the argA gene), which converts glutamate to N-acetylglutamate. This is followed by the conversion of N-acetylglutamate to N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate by N-acetylglutamate kinase (argB), and then to N-acetyl-glutamate semialdehyde by N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase (argC). The pathway continues with the conversion of N-acetyl-glutamate semialdehyde to N-acetylornithine, and eventually to arginine through several more steps.
Pseudomonas syringae is a versatile bacterium used in various genetic studies. Recent advancements in recombineering techniques, such as those using RecTE from Pseudomonas syringae, have simplified the process of introducing specific mutations into the bacterial genome . This technology allows for efficient manipulation of genes involved in metabolic pathways, including arginine biosynthesis.
While specific data on recombinant Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase (argC) is limited, studies on related enzymes and pathways provide valuable insights:
Arginine Biosynthesis and Pathogenicity: In Pseudomonas syringae, arginine biosynthesis is linked to pathogenicity, as mutations affecting arginine production can impact toxin production and plant pathogenicity .
Recombineering in Pseudomonas syringae: The RecTE system enables targeted gene disruptions, which could be applied to study the argC gene in detail .
Enzyme | Gene | Function |
---|---|---|
N-acetylglutamate synthetase | argA | Converts glutamate to N-acetylglutamate |
N-acetylglutamate kinase | argB | Converts N-acetylglutamate to N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate |
N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase | argC | Converts N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate to N-acetyl-glutamate semialdehyde |
Characterization of the argA Gene Required for Arginine Biosynthesis in Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae .
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Nonphosphorylated AlgR Induces Ribonucleotide Reductase Expression under Oxidative Stress Infectious Conditions .
Inference of Convergent Gene Acquisition Among Pseudomonas syringae Strains .
l-Amino Acid Ligase from Pseudomonas syringae Producing Tabtoxin .
RecTE(Psy)-mediated recombineering in Pseudomonas syringae .
This recombinant Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae N-acetyl-γ-glutamyl-phosphate reductase (ArgC) catalyzes the NADPH-dependent reduction of N-acetyl-5-glutamyl phosphate to N-acetyl-L-glutamate 5-semialdehyde.
KEGG: psb:Psyr_4569
STRING: 205918.Psyr_4569
N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase (AGPR) catalyzes the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-dependent reductive dephosphorylation of N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate to N-acetylglutamate-gamma-semialdehyde. This enzymatic reaction is a critical step in the arginine biosynthetic pathway that is essential for numerous microorganisms and plants, including Pseudomonas syringae . The pathway provides arginine, an amino acid crucial for protein synthesis and cellular functions. In P. syringae, this pathway is particularly important as it contributes to bacterial survival, growth, and potentially to pathogenicity in plant hosts.
The structure of N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase consists of two primary domains: an α/β domain and an α+β domain. The catalytic site is located in the cleft between these domains, where NADP+ binds . Upon cofactor binding, the enzyme undergoes a conformational change, particularly in a loop (Leu88 to His92) that moves more than 5 Å to confine the cofactor's adenine moiety in a hydrophobic pocket . This structural arrangement is essential for proper substrate positioning and catalytic function.
Based on structural analyses, several key residues play crucial roles in the catalytic mechanism of N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase. His217 and His219 form hydrogen bonds with the substrate, while Arg114 forms an ion pair with the substrate phosphate group . These interactions optimally position the substrate for nucleophilic attack by Cys158 on the substrate γ-carboxyl group. His219 likely functions as a general base to accept a proton from Cys158, with the adjacent ion pair interaction with Glu222's side-chain carboxyl group stabilizing the resulting positive charge on His219 .
For researchers designing site-directed mutagenesis experiments, these residues represent primary targets. Modifications to His217 or His219 would likely disrupt substrate binding, while alterations to Cys158 would directly impact the nucleophilic attack. Changes to Arg114 could affect phosphate group interactions, and modifications to Glu222 might destabilize the catalytic triad. Experimental validation through activity assays comparing wild-type and mutated enzymes would be essential for confirming these predictions.
Recombineering in P. syringae can be optimized using the RecTE homologous recombination system. For efficient manipulation of argC, consider the following methodology:
Vector selection: The pUCP24/47 vector system has been successfully used for expressing recombineering proteins in P. syringae .
Recombination protein expression: For single-stranded DNA oligonucleotide recombination, expressing the P. syringae RecT homolog is sufficient, while efficient double-stranded DNA recombination requires expression of both RecT and RecE homologs .
DNA substrate design: For argC targeting, design linear DNA fragments with 50-100 bp homology arms flanking the intended modification site. This approach has shown success in making targeted gene disruptions in the P. syringae chromosome .
Transformation optimization: Electroporation conditions should be optimized specifically for P. syringae pv. syringae (typically 2.5 kV, 25 μF, 200 Ω), and the recombination frequency can be calculated by standardizing the number of resistant transformants to 10^8 viable cells .
Selection strategy: For argC modifications, consider using antibiotic resistance markers or counterselectable markers like sacB to facilitate the isolation of recombinants .
When expressing recombinant P. syringae argC in heterologous systems, researchers often encounter solubility issues. These challenges can be addressed through several strategies:
Optimization of expression conditions: Lowering the induction temperature (16-20°C), reducing IPTG concentration, and extending expression time can improve solubility.
Solubility tags: Fusion with solubility-enhancing tags such as MBP (maltose-binding protein), SUMO, or TrxA (thioredoxin) can significantly increase soluble expression.
Co-expression with chaperones: Co-expressing argC with molecular chaperones (GroEL/GroES, DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE) can assist with proper protein folding.
Domain-based approach: Based on the structural information that argC consists of α/β and α+β domains with NADP+ binding in the cleft between them , expressing individual domains or optimizing constructs to prevent interdomain misfolding may improve solubility.
Buffer optimization: Screening various buffer conditions during purification, including different pH ranges, salt concentrations, and stabilizing additives such as glycerol or arginine, can enhance protein stability and solubility.
For optimal in vitro assay of N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase activity, consider these methodological parameters:
Buffer composition: A typical assay buffer would contain 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5-8.0), 100 mM NaCl, and 5 mM MgCl₂.
Cofactor requirements: Include 0.2-0.5 mM NADPH as the reducing cofactor, as the enzyme catalyzes an NADPH-dependent reaction .
Substrate concentration: Optimize N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate concentration between 0.1-1.0 mM for kinetic studies.
Reaction monitoring: The enzymatic activity can be monitored by:
Spectrophotometric measurement of NADPH oxidation at 340 nm
HPLC detection of the reaction product N-acetylglutamate-gamma-semialdehyde
Coupled enzyme assays that link product formation to a detectable signal
Controls: Include enzyme-free and substrate-free controls to account for background NADPH oxidation or other non-specific reactions.
Temperature and pH optimization: Based on the physiological conditions of P. syringae, starting points would be 25-30°C and pH 7.5, but optimization experiments should be conducted to determine the enzyme's pH and temperature optima.
To effectively analyze how argC mutations impact P. syringae pathogenicity, implement this comprehensive methodological approach:
Generation of defined mutants: Create precise argC mutations using recombineering with the P. syringae RecTE system . This allows for site-directed mutagenesis targeting specific catalytic residues (His217, His219, Cys158, Arg114) or complete gene knockouts.
In vitro growth characterization: Compare growth rates of wild-type and mutant strains in minimal media with and without arginine supplementation to assess auxotrophy.
Plant infection assays: Conduct standardized infection assays using:
Leaf infiltration with bacterial suspensions
Measurement of bacterial growth in planta over 0-7 days
Scoring of disease symptoms using established rating scales
Comparative analysis across multiple host plants to assess host range effects
Complementation studies: Perform genetic complementation with:
Wild-type argC
Site-directed argC mutants
Heterologous argC genes from related species
Transcriptomic analysis: Compare gene expression profiles between wild-type and argC mutants during infection to identify downstream effects on virulence gene expression.
Metabolomic analysis: Quantify arginine and related metabolites in wild-type and mutant strains to correlate metabolic changes with virulence phenotypes.
When investigating evolutionary conservation of argC across P. syringae pathovars, consider these methodological aspects:
Sample selection: Include representative strains from multiple P. syringae pathovars, ensuring coverage of the four major clades identified in phylogenetic analyses . The remarkable degree of congruence observed among housekeeping genes in P. syringae suggests argC likely follows similar evolutionary patterns .
Sequence analysis approach:
PCR amplification and sequencing of argC from diverse strains
Alignment and phylogenetic analysis using maximum-likelihood methods
Analysis of synonymous vs. non-synonymous substitution rates (dN/dS) to assess selective pressure
Host association analysis: Apply analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) to determine whether host association explains genetic variation in argC, similar to analyses showing host association explains only a small proportion of genetic variation in core genome genes .
Recombination assessment: Apply multiple methods to assess recombination rates:
Structural mapping of variations: Map sequence variations onto the protein structure to identify whether changes occur in functional regions (catalytic site, cofactor binding) or in less constrained regions.
Functional conservation testing: Express argC from different pathovars in a common genetic background to test functional complementation and enzyme kinetics.
When analyzing variations in catalytic efficiency among argC enzymes from different P. syringae strains, consider these interpretative frameworks:
Structure-function relationship analysis: Map amino acid variations to the 3D structure of the enzyme, particularly noting changes near:
Catalytic parameter comparison: Analyze differences in:
Km values for N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate and NADPH
kcat values representing catalytic turnover rates
kcat/Km ratios as measures of catalytic efficiency
Inhibition profiles and substrate specificity
Ecological context interpretation: Consider how variations correlate with:
Host plant preferences of different pathovars
Geographical origin of strains
Environmental adaptation factors
Evolutionary interpretation: Given that P. syringae has a low recombination rate (mutation is approximately four times more likely than recombination to change any nucleotide) , significant variations in argC may reflect long-term adaptive pressures rather than recent horizontal gene transfer.
Parameter | Interpretation of High Values | Interpretation of Low Values |
---|---|---|
Km for substrate | Lower substrate affinity; may indicate adaptation to environments with higher substrate availability | Higher substrate affinity; may indicate adaptation to substrate-limited environments |
kcat | Higher catalytic rate; suggests selection for rapid arginine biosynthesis | Lower catalytic rate; may indicate reduced metabolic demand for arginine |
kcat/Km | Higher catalytic efficiency; suggests optimization of the pathway | Lower efficiency; may indicate relaxed selection or alternative pathway utilization |
When analyzing relationships between argC variation and strain virulence, implement these statistical approaches:
Correlation analyses:
Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients to assess relationships between:
Enzyme kinetic parameters and quantitative virulence measures
Specific amino acid variations and virulence metrics
Multiple regression models to account for confounding variables
Comparative phylogenetic methods:
Phylogenetically independent contrasts to control for evolutionary relationships
Ancestral state reconstruction to infer the evolutionary history of argC variants
Tests for correlated evolution between argC features and virulence traits
Multivariate approaches:
Principal component analysis (PCA) to identify patterns of variation across multiple parameters
Cluster analysis to identify groups of strains with similar argC and virulence profiles
Partial least squares regression to identify which argC variations best predict virulence
Machine learning approaches:
Random forest algorithms to identify the most important argC features predicting virulence
Support vector machines for classification of strains based on argC features
Statistical power considerations:
When comparing argC function between different recombinant expression systems, implement this methodological framework:
Standardization of expression constructs:
Use identical coding sequences across expression systems
Standardize fusion tags or remove tags enzymatically before comparison
Verify complete sequence identity of the expressed protein
Protein quality assessment:
Circular dichroism spectroscopy to compare secondary structure
Thermal shift assays to assess protein stability
Size exclusion chromatography to confirm monomeric/oligomeric state
Activity measurements with defined substrate concentrations
Comparative enzymatic analysis:
Determine kinetic parameters (Km, kcat, kcat/Km) under identical conditions
Analyze pH and temperature optima and stability profiles
Assess cofactor specificity (NADPH vs. NADH)
Measure inhibition constants for potential inhibitors
Normalization approaches:
Express activity relative to protein concentration determined by multiple methods
Consider specific activity (units/mg) for direct comparison
Use internal standards across experiments
Statistical analysis:
ANOVA with post-hoc tests to identify significant differences
Equivalence testing to determine if different expression systems produce functionally similar enzymes
Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Best For |
---|---|---|---|
E. coli | High yield, simple cultivation, numerous vector options | Lack of post-translational modifications, inclusion body formation | Initial characterization, structural studies, high-throughput screening |
P. syringae | Native environment, correct post-translational modifications | Lower yield, more challenging cultivation | Physiological studies, in vivo function analysis |
Yeast systems | Eukaryotic processing, good for solubility | Glycosylation may differ, slower growth | When prokaryotic expression fails, protein requiring eukaryotic machinery |
Cell-free systems | Rapid expression, toxic protein tolerance | Higher cost, lower yield | Quick screening, proteins toxic to cells |
The development of argC-targeted antimicrobials against P. syringae infections could follow these methodological approaches:
Structure-based inhibitor design:
Allosteric inhibitor development:
Validation methodology:
In vitro enzyme inhibition assays with purified recombinant argC
Cell-based assays measuring growth inhibition of P. syringae in minimal media
Plant infection models assessing protection efficacy
Resistance development monitoring in sequential passage experiments
Delivery system considerations:
Formulation optimization for foliar application
Systemic delivery through plant vascular systems
Nanoparticle-based targeted delivery
Selectivity assessment:
Comparative inhibition of argC from beneficial microorganisms
Effects on plant AGPR homologs
Environmental impact studies
For successful expression and purification of active recombinant argC for structural studies, implement this methodological strategy:
Expression system optimization:
Test multiple expression hosts (E. coli BL21(DE3), Rosetta, Arctic Express)
Evaluate codon-optimized synthetic genes
Screen expression temperature (16-30°C), inducer concentration, and duration
Co-express with molecular chaperones (GroEL/GroES, DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE)
Construct design considerations:
Purification protocol development:
Implement multi-step purification (affinity, ion exchange, size exclusion)
Screen buffer conditions (pH 6.0-8.5, NaCl 50-500 mM)
Include stabilizing additives (5-10% glycerol, 1-5 mM DTT, 0.1-1 mM EDTA)
Add NADP+ (0.1-1 mM) to stabilize enzyme conformation
Activity preservation strategies:
Monitor activity throughout purification
Identify and minimize proteolytic degradation
Optimize storage conditions (-80°C vs. liquid nitrogen)
Test cryoprotectants (glycerol, sucrose, trehalose)
Structural biology preparation:
Assess homogeneity by dynamic light scattering
Verify secondary structure by circular dichroism
Perform thermal shift assays to identify stabilizing conditions
Conduct crystallization pre-screens to identify promising conditions
Purification Step | Purpose | Critical Parameters |
---|---|---|
IMAC | Initial capture | Imidazole concentration, flow rate, pH |
Ion exchange | Remove contaminants | Salt gradient rate, pH relative to pI |
Size exclusion | Final polishing, buffer exchange | Flow rate, column resolution, sample concentration |
Tag cleavage | Remove fusion partner | Protease:protein ratio, temperature, time |
To investigate regulatory mechanisms controlling argC expression in P. syringae under various environmental conditions, implement these methodological approaches:
Promoter analysis:
5' RACE to map transcription start sites
Reporter fusion constructs (GFP, luciferase) to monitor promoter activity
Deletion analysis to identify regulatory elements
DNA-protein interaction studies (EMSA, DNase footprinting) to identify transcription factor binding sites
Transcriptional regulation studies:
RNA-seq analysis under various conditions (nutrient limitation, plant extract exposure, temperature shifts)
qRT-PCR validation of expression changes
ChIP-seq to identify transcription factors binding to the argC promoter
Construction of transcription factor mutants using recombineering with the P. syringae RecTE system
Post-transcriptional regulation:
Analysis of mRNA stability under different conditions
Investigation of potential small RNA regulators
Ribosome profiling to assess translation efficiency
Metabolic regulation:
Metabolomic analysis to correlate arginine pathway metabolites with argC expression
Enzyme activity assays under different growth conditions
Feedback inhibition studies with pathway end products
In planta expression analysis:
Laser capture microdissection coupled with qRT-PCR
In planta imaging of reporter strains
Comparison of expression in resistant versus susceptible host plants
Environmental Condition | Expected Regulatory Mechanism | Experimental Approach |
---|---|---|
Nitrogen limitation | Upregulation via nitrogen response regulators | Compare expression in rich vs. minimal media with transcriptomics |
Host plant environment | Induction by plant-specific signals | In planta expression vs. laboratory media using reporter fusions |
Temperature stress | Regulation via heat or cold shock response | Temperature shift experiments with time-course sampling |
Oxidative stress | Potential coordination with stress response | H₂O₂ exposure experiments and mutant analysis |