Anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase (TrpD) catalyzes the transfer of the phosphoribosyl group from 5-phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphate (PRPP) to anthranilate, yielding N-(5'-phosphoribosyl)-anthranilate (PRA).
KEGG: pst:PSPTO_0593
STRING: 223283.PSPTO_0593
Anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase (TrpD) in P. syringae pv. tomato catalyzes the second step in the tryptophan biosynthesis pathway. Specifically, it transfers the phosphoribosyl group from 5-phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphate (PRPP) to anthranilate, yielding N-(5'-phosphoribosyl)-anthranilate (PRA) . This reaction is essential for bacterial survival as it forms part of the critical metabolic pathway converting chorismate to tryptophan.
Recent research has revealed that TrpD also plays a secondary role in thiamine (vitamin B1) biosynthesis. Studies have demonstrated that TrpD can generate phosphoribosylamine (PRA) from enamines and PRPP, an intermediate required for thiamine synthesis . This dual functionality makes TrpD particularly significant for metabolic integration studies.
The catalytic mechanism appears to follow a dissociative pathway similar to other phosphoribosyltransferases . The enzyme's significance in bacterial metabolism is highlighted by its conservation across Pseudomonas species and its potential as an antimicrobial target due to its essentiality for bacterial growth in environments where tryptophan is limited.
In Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, the trpD gene is identified with the gene ID 1182204 . While the search results don't explicitly detail the entire genomic organization in P. syringae pv. tomato, insights from related Pseudomonas species provide valuable information about likely arrangements.
Studies on P. putida, a related species, have shown that the trpD gene exists as part of the trpGDC operon . This organization, with tryptophan biosynthesis genes distributed in multiple clusters rather than a single operon, is characteristic of Pseudomonas species. The trpGDC operon contains genes encoding:
trpG: Anthranilate synthase, component II
trpD: Anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase
trpC: Indole-3-glycerol phosphate synthase
The physical organization of tryptophan biosynthesis genes in Pseudomonas typically consists of:
This organization differs from other bacteria such as Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Burkholderia acidovorans, where tryptophan biosynthesis genes are arranged differently. In Pseudomonas species, the trpE gene is typically separated from the trpGDC operon by one or two genes of unknown function .
Although the search results don't provide a specific protocol for P. syringae pv. tomato TrpD expression, general methodological approaches for recombinant expression and purification of bacterial enzymes can be applied with optimization for this specific protein.
Expression system optimization:
Construct design:
Expression conditions optimization:
Compare E. coli expression strains (BL21(DE3), Rosetta, Arctic Express)
Test induction parameters (IPTG concentration: 0.1-1.0 mM)
Evaluate temperature conditions (37°C for 3-4 hours vs. 16-18°C overnight)
Consider co-expression with chaperones if folding is problematic
Purification strategy:
Primary purification:
Secondary purification:
Quality assessment:
SDS-PAGE for purity evaluation
Activity assays measuring conversion of anthranilate and PRPP to PRA
Thermal shift assays for protein stability assessment
For studying structure-function relationships, crystallization trials could be set up with purified TrpD in the presence of substrates or inhibitors, as has been done with related anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferases .
Several complementary approaches can be employed to measure TrpD activity, depending on the research objectives and available equipment:
Direct enzymatic assays:
Spectrophotometric/fluorometric methods:
Monitoring anthranilate consumption (excitation: 310 nm, emission: 400 nm)
Following decrease in PRPP concentration using coupled assays
Detection of pyrophosphate release using enzyme-coupled assays with pyrophosphatase and detection reagents
Chromatographic techniques:
HPLC separation and quantification of anthranilate, PRPP, and PRA
LC-MS for more sensitive detection and confirmation of product identity
Genetic complementation approaches:
In vivo functional assessment:
A standard enzyme assay protocol might include:
Reaction buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl₂
Substrate concentrations: 0.1-1.0 mM anthranilate, 1-5 mM PRPP
Incubation at 25-30°C for 5-30 minutes
Reaction termination with acid or heat
Product detection as described above
For kinetic parameter determination, varying substrate concentrations would be used while keeping other parameters constant. When studying the alternative TrpD activity in thiamine synthesis, isotopic labeling can be employed to trace the conversion of enamines to phosphoribosylamine .
Anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase (TrpD) has a distinctive structure with key features that determine its substrate binding and catalytic mechanism:
Homodimeric enzyme with the active site located in the hinge region between two domains
Each monomer contains distinct domains responsible for binding different substrates
Substrate binding sites:
PRPP binding:
Anthranilate binding:
Catalytic mechanism:
Follows a dissociative mechanism similar to other phosphoribosyltransferases
Involves formation of a ribosyl carbonium ion intermediate
Nucleophilic attack by anthranilate on this intermediate forms the PRA product
The multi-binding mode for anthranilate has implications for inhibitor design, as the best inhibitors exploit these multiple binding sites . For the secondary activity in thiamine synthesis, TrpD can accommodate 4- and 5-carbon enamines as substrates instead of anthranilate, with variants affecting substrate binding residues impacting this alternative activity while retaining the primary function .
Crystal structures of anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase with substrates, substrate analogues, and inhibitors have provided valuable insights into these structural features and the catalytic mechanism .
Recent research has uncovered a novel secondary function of TrpD in thiamine biosynthesis, distinct from its primary role in tryptophan synthesis. The evidence for this function comes from detailed biochemical and genetic studies:
Biochemical evidence:
Substrate flexibility:
Product identification:
Genetic evidence:
Structure-function relationships:
TrpD variants with substitutions at residues involved in binding anthranilate or PRPP were proficient for tryptophan synthesis but unable to support PRA formation in vivo in Salmonella enterica
This suggests the canonical and alternative activities share the same active site but with different substrate specificities
Metabolic context:
This discovery highlights how well-characterized biosynthetic enzymes can have "moonlighting" functions that contribute to metabolic network robustness. The ability of TrpD to generate PRA represents an alternative route for thiamine biosynthesis, potentially important under specific growth conditions or metabolic states.
Impact on bacterial growth:
Auxotrophy development:
Growth environment restrictions:
TrpD mutants would likely be severely limited in environments where tryptophan is scarce
This includes the plant apoplastic space during infection, which typically has limited free amino acids
Potential virulence implications:
Infection process constraints:
The ability to synthesize essential amino acids is critical for successful plant colonization
Tryptophan auxotrophy would likely impair bacterial multiplication in planta
Metabolic burden considerations:
Even if some tryptophan is available in host tissues, reliance on uptake rather than synthesis creates a competitive disadvantage
Energy typically used for virulence factor production might be diverted to amino acid acquisition
Secondary effects:
For researchers investigating trpD mutations, comprehensive approaches would include:
Constructing defined deletion or point mutants
Comparative growth analyses in various media with different tryptophan availability
Plant infection assays comparing wild-type and mutant strains
In planta competition assays between wild-type and mutant strains
Transcriptomic analysis to identify compensatory responses to trpD mutation
Recombination has played a significant role in shaping P. syringae evolution, with implications for metabolic genes including trpD:
Evidence for recombination in P. syringae:
Population genetic analyses:
Genomic impact:
Implications for trpD evolution:
Phylogenetic patterns:
Functional consequences:
Host adaptation factors:
For metabolic genes like trpD, recombination provides a mechanism for rapid adaptation without the accumulation of potentially deleterious mutations in essential pathways. This process may be particularly important for plant pathogens like P. syringae that must adapt to diverse host environments with different nutrient availabilities.
TrpD shows considerable conservation across Pseudomonas species, reflecting its essential role in tryptophan biosynthesis:
Sequence conservation:
Amino acid similarity:
Structural conservation:
The catalytic core and substrate binding residues show particularly high conservation
This reflects the fundamental importance of the reaction catalyzed by TrpD
Genomic organization conservation:
Gene clustering patterns:
Genomic context:
This conservation table for TrpD shows representative identity percentages between selected Pseudomonas species based on information in the search results:
| Species Comparison | TrpD Amino Acid Identity (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Within Pseudomonas genus | 71-97% | |
| P. syringae pathovars | Higher end of range | Inferred |
| P. syringae vs. P. putida | Lower end of range | Inferred |
The high conservation of TrpD across Pseudomonas species highlights its fundamental importance in bacterial metabolism and suggests that any sequence variations might reflect fine-tuning to specific ecological niches rather than major functional differences.
According to STRING database analysis, TrpD in P. syringae has several high-confidence predicted functional interactions with other proteins, particularly those involved in the tryptophan biosynthesis pathway:
Highest confidence interactions:
Core tryptophan pathway enzymes:
Additional tryptophan pathway components:
Functional significance of interactions:
Metabolic channeling:
TrpD directly utilizes anthranilate produced by TrpE/TrpG
The PRA product from TrpD serves as substrate for TrpF
These sequential enzymatic reactions may involve direct protein-protein interactions for efficient intermediate transfer
Co-regulation:
Evolutionary constraints:
These interaction predictions align with the genomic organization of trp genes in Pseudomonas species, where trpD is found in the trpGDC operon . The high confidence scores across multiple enzymes in the pathway suggest that TrpD functions as part of a coordinated biosynthetic network rather than in isolation.
Targeting TrpD for inhibitor development represents a promising approach for controlling P. syringae infections in plants. Several strategic approaches can be employed:
Structure-based design strategies:
Targeting unique binding sites:
Rationale from existing structures:
Compound screening approaches:
High-throughput screening:
Develop fluorescence-based assays monitoring anthranilate consumption
Screen compound libraries against purified recombinant TrpD
Confirm hits with secondary assays and structural studies
Fragment-based screening:
Identify small molecules that bind to different sites within the enzyme
Link fragments to create higher-affinity inhibitors
Use thermal shift assays to identify stabilizing fragments
Target validation considerations:
Essentiality confirmation:
Specificity engineering:
Delivery strategies for plant protection:
Formulate inhibitors for foliar application
Consider systemic delivery through plant vascular systems
Design pro-inhibitors activated by plant or bacterial enzymes
As TrpD is part of an essential biosynthetic pathway and shows distinct structural features, it represents a valuable target for developing new agricultural antimicrobials against P. syringae infections.
While the search results don't directly address TrpD's specific role in host adaptation, several lines of evidence suggest potential contributions:
Host range determinants:
Metabolic flexibility:
P. syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 has an unusually wide host range including tomato, Arabidopsis thaliana, and cauliflower
Most other tomato isolates form a distinct cluster that is pathogenic only on tomato
This suggests that metabolic capabilities, potentially including efficient tryptophan biosynthesis, may contribute to host range expansion
Nutritional adaptation:
Different plant hosts provide varying levels of amino acids in apoplastic fluids
Efficient tryptophan biosynthesis would be particularly important in hosts with limited free tryptophan
The dual functionality of TrpD in both tryptophan and thiamine synthesis pathways may provide metabolic advantages in certain host environments
Evolutionary considerations:
Recombination effects:
Recombination has contributed more than mutation to variation between P. syringae isolates
This could affect metabolic genes like trpD, potentially influencing adaptation to different hosts
The organization of trpD in an operon with other tryptophan biosynthesis genes might facilitate co-evolution of functionally related genes
Selection pressures:
Different plant hosts may impose different selection pressures on tryptophan biosynthesis
TrpD variants could potentially be selected for optimal performance in specific host environments
The dual role of TrpD in both tryptophan and thiamine synthesis may provide metabolic flexibility that contributes to the ability of P. syringae to colonize different plant hosts. This metabolic versatility, combined with the pathogen's type III secretion system for delivering effector proteins , likely enables successful adaptation to various plant environments.
While the search results don't provide specific kinetic parameters for P. syringae TrpD, we can outline the typical parameters that would be assessed and how they might compare with other bacterial TrpDs:
Key kinetic parameters for TrpD characterization:
| Parameter | Description | Typical Range | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Km (anthranilate) | Substrate concentration at half-maximal velocity | 0.1-50 μM | Varying anthranilate at fixed PRPP |
| Km (PRPP) | Substrate concentration at half-maximal velocity | 10-200 μM | Varying PRPP at fixed anthranilate |
| kcat | Catalytic rate constant | 1-100 s⁻¹ | Product formation at saturating substrates |
| kcat/Km | Catalytic efficiency | 10⁴-10⁶ M⁻¹s⁻¹ | Derived from Km and kcat |
| Ki (anthranilate) | Inhibition constant for substrate inhibition | Variable | Observed at high anthranilate concentrations |
Comparative considerations:
For researchers investigating P. syringae TrpD kinetics, enzyme assays should be performed under standardized conditions (pH 7.5-8.0, 25-30°C, 5 mM Mg²⁺) to enable direct comparison with published values for other bacterial TrpDs. Additionally, the potential for substrate inhibition should be explicitly examined by testing a wide range of anthranilate concentrations.
While the search results don't specifically address methods for studying trpD regulation in P. syringae, several approaches can be inferred from research on related systems:
Transcriptional analysis methods:
Quantitative techniques:
RT-qPCR for measuring trpD transcript levels under different conditions
RNA-Seq for genome-wide expression analysis including trpD
Northern blotting for detecting specific trpD transcripts and operon structure
Promoter analysis approaches:
Reporter gene fusions (lacZ, gfp) to trpD promoter regions
Primer extension and 5' RACE to map transcription start sites
ChIP-seq to identify transcription factor binding sites
Regulatory element identification:
Genetic approaches:
Deletion analysis of promoter regions to identify regulatory elements
Site-directed mutagenesis of potential regulatory sequences
Isolation of regulatory mutants with altered trpD expression
Biochemical methods:
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) to detect protein-DNA interactions
DNase I footprinting to precisely map binding sites
In vitro transcription assays with purified components
Regulatory network analysis:
System-level approaches:
Transcriptomics under various environmental conditions
Perturbation studies with regulatory gene knockouts
Network inference from large-scale expression datasets
Research in P. putida has shown that the trpD gene is part of the trpGDC operon , suggesting coordinated regulation of these genes. Additionally, the search results mention AefR as a transcriptional regulator in P. syringae pv. phaseolicola that influences type III secretion system gene induction , suggesting complex regulatory networks that might impact trpD expression during host interaction.
For comprehensive analysis of trpD regulation, researchers should examine expression under conditions relevant to the bacterium's lifecycle, including minimal vs. rich media, plant extract exposure, and various stress conditions.
CRISPR-Cas9 technology offers powerful approaches for studying TrpD function in P. syringae through precise genetic manipulation:
Gene editing applications:
Knockout strategies:
Complete deletion of trpD to create auxotrophs for complementation studies
Introduction of premature stop codons to generate truncated proteins
Targeted disruption of specific domains to dissect structure-function relationships
Precise mutations:
Regulatory studies:
Promoter modifications:
Targeted changes to regulatory elements controlling trpD expression
Introduction of inducible promoters for controlled expression
Creation of reporter fusions at the native locus
Operon structure analysis:
Advanced applications:
CRISPRi (CRISPR interference):
Reversible repression of trpD expression using catalytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9)
Tunable repression through modified guide RNAs
Temporal control of expression during different infection stages
CRISPRa (CRISPR activation):
Upregulation of trpD expression to assess metabolic effects
Controlled overexpression to study potential feedback inhibition
Multiplexed editing:
Simultaneous modification of trpD and interacting genes
Creation of multiple variants in parallel for comparative analysis
For implementing CRISPR-Cas9 systems in P. syringae, researchers should consider:
Selection of appropriate Cas9 variants optimized for GC-rich Pseudomonas genomes
Development of efficient delivery methods (electroporation, conjugation)
Use of temperature-sensitive plasmids for transient Cas9 expression
Implementation of appropriate selection/counter-selection strategies
Verification of edits through sequencing and phenotypic characterization