The Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 is a phytopathogenic bacterium that infects tomato plants . Within Pseudomonas syringae exists a protein, PSPTO_3837, which is a multidrug resistance (MDR) transporter that has orthologs in other plant-associated species within the Pseudomonas genus . PSPTO_3837 contributes to the bacterium's resistance to plant antimicrobials and is relevant in the survival of PsPto in tomato plants .
PSPTO_3837 is homologous to Maf1, a protein originally identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) . In yeast, Maf1 is a negative regulator of RNA polymerase III (Pol III), which is responsible for the transcription of small, untranslated RNAs, such as transfer RNA (tRNA) . Maf1 responds to changes in the cellular environment and represses Pol III transcription .
In humans, the MAF1 gene encodes a protein homologous to the S. cerevisiae Maf1 protein . Human Maf1 functions as a transcriptional repressor of RNA polymerase III . Maf1-dependent repression occurs in response to a wide range of conditions, suggesting that the protein itself is targeted by the major nutritional and stress-signaling pathways .
Biochemical studies have identified the initiation factor TFIIIB as a target for Maf1-dependent repression . Furthermore, Maf1 is a substrate for cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) in vitro and is differentially phosphorylated on PKA sites in vivo under normal versus repressing conditions . PKA activity negatively regulates Maf1 function because strains with unregulated high PKA activity block repression of pol III transcription in vivo, and strains lacking all PKA activity are hyperrepressible .
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 utilizes multidrug resistance efflux pumps to protect against antimicrobial compounds . PSPTO_0820 is a predicted multidrug transporter from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, and orthologs of this protein are conserved within many Pseudomonas species that interact with plants . A mutant in PSPTO_0820 and a mutant in PSPTO_4977 were more susceptible to trans-cinnamic and chlorogenic acids and to the flavonoid (+)-catechin, when added to the culture medium . The expression level of both genes increased in the presence of (+)-catechin and, in the case of PSPTO_0820, also in response to trans-cinnamic acid . PSPTO_0820 and PSPTO_4977 mutants were unable to colonize tomato at high population levels . This demonstrates the involvement of these two proteins in the resistance to plant antimicrobials, supporting also the importance of chlorogenic acid, trans-cinnamic acid, and (+)-catechin in the tomato plant defense response against P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 infection .
Nuclear accumulation of Maf1 is required for transcriptional repression and is regulated by two nuclear localization sequences in the protein . An analysis of PKA phosphosite mutants shows that the localization of Maf1 is affected via the N-terminal nuclear localization sequence . Mutations that prevent phosphorylation at PKA consensus sites promote nuclear accumulation of Maf1 without inducing repression . Negative regulation of Maf1 by PKA is achieved by inhibiting its nuclear import, suggesting that a PKA-independent activation step is required for nuclear Maf1 to function in the repression of pol III transcription .
MAF1 activity is also influenced by nutrient levels via the MTORC1 pathway . MTORC1 inhibits MAF1, which in turn inhibits tRNA production; therefore, high nutrient levels promote MTORC1 activity, leading to decreased MAF1 activity and increased tRNA production . Conversely, low nutrient levels result in reduced MTORC1 activity, increased MAF1 activity, and decreased tRNA production .
KEGG: pst:PSPTO_3837
STRING: 223283.PSPTO_3837
Maf-like proteins in P. syringae pv. tomato belong to the broader Maf (multicopy associated filamentation) protein family found across prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The fundamental biochemical activity of Maf proteins has been identified as nucleotide pyrophosphatase activity against both canonical nucleotides (dTTP, UTP, and CTP) and modified nucleotides (5-methyl-UTP, pseudo-UTP, 5-methyl-CTP, and 7-methyl-GTP) .
These proteins contain a conserved signature motif (S-R-E-K-D-K): Ser10, Arg13, Glu33, Lys52, Asp70, and Lys82, which is essential for their enzymatic function . In bacterial systems, Maf proteins are implicated in cell division processes and potentially in the prevention of incorporation of modified nucleotides into cellular nucleic acids, serving a "house-cleaning" function .
In the context of P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000, Maf-like proteins may participate in regulatory networks involving virulence and pathogenicity, potentially interacting with other regulatory systems such as the PsrA (Pseudomonas sigma regulator) that controls virulence factors .
For optimal recombinant expression of PSPTO_3837, the pET expression system, particularly pET-28a(+), has proven effective for similar bacterial proteins . This approach offers the following advantages:
Expression Protocol:
Clone the PSPTO_3837 gene using primers designed based on the DC3000 genome sequence
Insert the gene into pET-28a(+) vector between appropriate restriction sites (typically EcoRI and HindIII)
Transform the recombinant plasmid into E. coli BL21(DE3) competent cells
Induce expression using IPTG (typically 0.5-1.0 mM)
Harvest cells and lyse using appropriate buffer systems
The pET-28a(+) vector provides a His-tag sequence that facilitates subsequent purification using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography . Analysis of the recombinant protein expression should include SDS-PAGE to confirm the expected molecular weight and Western blotting using anti-His antibodies to verify the presence of the fusion protein .
Verification of recombinant PSPTO_3837's structural integrity and enzymatic activity requires a multi-faceted approach:
Structural Integrity Assessment:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to analyze secondary structure elements
Thermal shift assays to determine protein stability
Dynamic light scattering to assess homogeneity
Limited proteolysis to identify stable domains
Enzymatic Activity Assays:
The nucleotide pyrophosphatase activity can be assessed using a methodology similar to that employed for other Maf proteins :
| Substrate | Expected Activity | Detection Method |
|---|---|---|
| dTTP | Hydrolysis to dTMP | HPLC or coupled enzyme assay |
| UTP | Hydrolysis to UMP | HPLC or coupled enzyme assay |
| CTP | Hydrolysis to CMP | HPLC or coupled enzyme assay |
| 5-methyl-UTP | Hydrolysis to 5-methyl-UMP | HPLC or coupled enzyme assay |
| 7-methyl-GTP | Hydrolysis to 7-methyl-GMP | HPLC or coupled enzyme assay |
The enzymatic reaction can be monitored by measuring the release of pyrophosphate (PPi) using commercially available pyrophosphatase-coupled colorimetric assays or by direct detection of the nucleotide monophosphate products .
Optimal purification of recombinant PSPTO_3837 with His-tag can be achieved through a sequential purification strategy:
Multi-step Purification Protocol:
Initial Capture: Ni-NTA affinity chromatography using imidazole gradient elution (typically 20-300 mM)
Intermediate Purification: Ion exchange chromatography (either anion or cation exchange depending on the protein's pI)
Polishing Step: Size exclusion chromatography using appropriate buffer conditions (typically 20-50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5-8.0, 100-200 mM NaCl, 1-5 mM DTT)
Critical Parameters for Maintaining Activity:
Include 5-10% glycerol in all buffers to enhance stability
Add 0.5-1 mM EDTA to chelate metal ions that could inhibit activity
Maintain pH between 7.0-8.0 throughout purification
Keep temperature at 4°C during all purification steps
Consider adding protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
This protocol typically yields protein with >95% purity suitable for enzymatic and structural studies .
The substrate specificity of PSPTO_3837 can be analyzed through comparative structural and functional studies with other Maf proteins. Based on studies of related Maf proteins, specificity is likely determined by key residues in the active site .
Comparative Substrate Specificity Analysis:
| Maf Protein | Preferred Substrates | Key Specificity Residues |
|---|---|---|
| E. coli YhdE | dTTP, UTP, 5-methyl-UTP | Arg12, Thr71, Gln153 |
| E. coli YceF | CTP, 5-methyl-CTP, pseudo-UTP | Aromatic residue at position 12, Gln70, Glu154 |
| PSPTO_3837 (predicted) | Unknown (requires experimental determination) | To be determined |
Structural elements that likely determine specificity include:
The conserved S-R-E-K-D-K motif forms the active site core
Variable residues surrounding this core create distinct binding pockets
Loop regions that can adopt different conformations upon substrate binding
To experimentally determine specificity, researchers should:
Perform site-directed mutagenesis of predicted specificity-determining residues
Conduct comparative kinetic analyses (kcat/Km) with various substrates
Obtain crystal structures with different bound substrates or substrate analogs
Use molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations to predict binding modes
PSPTO_3837 may play a significant role in quorum sensing and virulence regulation in P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000, potentially interacting with established regulatory systems.
Potential Regulatory Interactions:
Quorum Sensing Connection: P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 produces N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs) as quorum sensing signals, regulated by PsyR (a LuxR-type regulator) and PsyI (AHL synthase) . PSPTO_3837 might modulate this signaling pathway through nucleotide metabolism or direct interaction.
Virulence Regulation: The PsrA regulator in DC3000 controls expression of virulence factors and the hypersensitive response . If PSPTO_3837 interacts with this pathway, it could affect pathogenicity.
Experimental Approaches to Investigate This Role:
Create PSPTO_3837 knockout mutants and assess:
AHL production levels
Expression of virulence genes (using qRT-PCR)
Ability to elicit the hypersensitive response in plants
Virulence in tomato and Arabidopsis models
Perform transcriptome analysis comparing wild-type and ΔPSPTO_3837 strains under:
Investigate protein-protein interactions between PSPTO_3837 and known virulence regulators using:
Bacterial two-hybrid assays
Co-immunoprecipitation
Surface plasmon resonance
The regulatory framework of P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 includes complex interactions between PsrA, AefR, and RpoS, which collectively regulate quorum sensing and virulence . Understanding how PSPTO_3837 fits into this network would provide valuable insights into bacterial pathogenicity mechanisms.
Advanced structural biology techniques can reveal the catalytic mechanism of PSPTO_3837 with atomic-level precision:
Comprehensive Structural Biology Workflow:
X-ray Crystallography:
Crystallize PSPTO_3837 in apo form and with substrate analogs/inhibitors
Resolve structures at high resolution (<2.0 Å)
Identify catalytic residues and binding pocket architecture
Crystallize site-directed mutants to confirm the role of specific residues
Cryo-Electron Microscopy:
Useful if the protein forms larger complexes or is difficult to crystallize
Can capture different conformational states during catalysis
NMR Spectroscopy:
Analyze protein dynamics in solution
Perform chemical shift perturbation experiments to map substrate binding
Study conformational changes upon substrate binding
Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry:
Identify regions with altered solvent accessibility during catalysis
Map conformational changes upon substrate binding
Molecular Dynamics Simulations:
Model substrate binding and reaction trajectory
Predict transition states and energy barriers
Simulate effects of mutations on catalytic efficiency
Based on studies of related Maf proteins, the catalytic mechanism likely involves:
A nucleophilic attack on the α-phosphate of the nucleotide substrate
Coordination of divalent metal ions (Mg²⁺ or Mn²⁺) to stabilize the reaction intermediate
Specific interactions between the conserved S-R-E-K-D-K motif and the substrate
Investigating PSPTO_3837's role in plant-pathogen interactions requires a multi-faceted approach combining molecular genetics, cell biology, and plant pathology techniques:
Comprehensive Investigation Strategy:
Generation of Bacterial Mutants:
Create clean deletion mutants (ΔPSPTO_3837)
Develop complementation strains (ΔPSPTO_3837 + PSPTO_3837)
Engineer point mutations in critical residues
Create reporter fusion strains (PSPTO_3837-GFP, PSPTO_3837 promoter-luciferase)
Plant Infection Studies:
Microscopy and Cellular Localization:
Use confocal microscopy with fluorescent reporter strains to track:
Bacterial localization during infection
Protein localization within bacterial cells
Temporal expression patterns during infection
Host Response Analysis:
Compare plant defense responses to wild-type and mutant strains:
ROS production
Callose deposition
Defense gene expression
Hypersensitive response
Interactome Studies:
Identify plant proteins that interact with PSPTO_3837 using:
Yeast two-hybrid screening
Co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation in planta
The specific type III secretion system of P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 delivers effector proteins into plant cells to suppress host immunity . Determining whether PSPTO_3837 influences this system or directly interacts with host factors would provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms of bacterial pathogenesis.
Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) can significantly impact both the activity and stability of recombinant Maf-like proteins such as PSPTO_3837. Though bacterial proteins typically have fewer PTMs than eukaryotic proteins, several modifications may be relevant:
Investigation of Potential PTMs:
Phosphorylation:
Maf proteins in eukaryotes are regulated by phosphorylation on serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues
In bacteria, phosphorylation may occur through two-component signaling systems
Methods for detection:
Mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) with phosphopeptide enrichment
Phospho-specific antibodies (if available)
Phos-tag SDS-PAGE
Oxidation of Cysteine Residues:
May form disulfide bonds or undergo reversible oxidation
Can regulate protein activity in response to oxidative stress
Detection methods:
Mass spectrometry with differential alkylation
Ellman's reagent for free thiol quantification
Diagonal electrophoresis
Proteolytic Processing:
N-terminal or C-terminal processing may occur
Detection methods:
N-terminal sequencing (Edman degradation)
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
Western blotting with domain-specific antibodies
Experimental Approach to Study PTM Effects:
| Experimental Approach | Purpose | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Site-directed mutagenesis of PTM sites | Determine functional significance | Change in activity or stability |
| In vitro modification (e.g., with kinases) | Directly test effect of PTM | Altered enzymatic parameters |
| Expression under different stress conditions | Identify condition-dependent modifications | Correlation between stress, PTMs, and activity |
| Comparative analysis of wild-type vs. modified protein | Quantify impact on stability and activity | Thermostability changes, altered kinetic parameters |
To assess stability changes resulting from PTMs, researchers should employ thermal shift assays, limited proteolysis, and long-term storage studies under various conditions. For activity assessment, standard nucleotide pyrophosphatase assays comparing modified and unmodified versions of the protein would provide quantitative data on the functional impact of specific PTMs.
Advanced bioinformatic approaches can provide valuable insights into the functional partners and evolutionary context of PSPTO_3837:
Comprehensive Bioinformatic Analysis Strategy:
Phylogenetic Analysis:
Construct maximum likelihood or Bayesian phylogenetic trees of Maf-like proteins across:
Different Pseudomonas species
Plant pathogenic bacteria
Model organisms with characterized Maf proteins
Analyze patterns of sequence conservation using tools like CONSURF
Identify evolutionary rates and selective pressures using dN/dS analysis
Protein Domain Analysis:
Genomic Context Analysis:
Examine gene neighborhoods across Pseudomonas genomes
Identify consistently co-located genes (potential functional partners)
Analyze operon structures and regulatory elements
Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction:
Use tools like STRING, PSICQUIC, and PrePPI
Identify conserved interaction partners across species
Predict interaction interfaces using tools like PRISM or HADDOCK
Co-expression Analysis:
Mine transcriptomic datasets to identify genes with similar expression patterns
Focus on plant infection conditions and stress responses
Construct co-expression networks to identify functional modules
Example of Phylogenetic Classification:
| Pseudomonas Group | Representative Species | Maf-like Protein Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| P. syringae complex | P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 | PSPTO_3837 and orthologs |
| P. fluorescens group | P. fluorescens Pf-5 | Predicted nucleotide pyrophosphatase activity |
| P. aeruginosa group | P. aeruginosa PAO1 | YhdE-like and YceF-like proteins |
| P. putida group | P. putida KT2440 | Diverse substrate specificities |
The functional prediction would be enhanced by integrating these computational approaches with experimental data from genetic screens, such as the competitive selection methodology used to identify novel flagellar motility genes in P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 .