Recombinant Putative cellulose synthesis regulatory protein (yedQ)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to Recombinant Putative Cellulose Synthesis Regulatory Protein (yedQ)

The recombinant putative cellulose synthesis regulatory protein, YedQ, is a key GGDEF domain protein involved in the regulation of cellulose synthesis in certain strains of Escherichia coli, notably E. coli 1094. This protein plays a crucial role in an alternative pathway for cellulose production that is independent of the traditional CsgD/AdrA regulatory cascade commonly found in other E. coli strains and Salmonella species .

Function and Mechanism of YedQ

YedQ functions as a diguanylate cyclase, catalyzing the synthesis of cyclic-di-GMP (c-di-GMP), a second messenger molecule that regulates various cellular processes, including cellulose production and biofilm formation . The GGEEF motif in YedQ is essential for its function, as mutations in this motif abolish its ability to restore cellulose synthesis and biofilm formation in E. coli 1094 mutants .

Role in Cellulose Synthesis and Biofilm Formation

YedQ is indispensable for cellulose production and biofilm formation in E. coli 1094. Deletion of the yedQ gene results in a significant reduction in cellulose synthesis and impaired biofilm formation, which can be restored by introducing a plasmid-borne yedQ gene under an inducible promoter . This highlights the critical role of YedQ in maintaining the structural integrity of biofilms through cellulose production.

Comparison with Other Regulatory Pathways

Unlike the CsgD/AdrA pathway, which is prevalent in many E. coli strains and Salmonella, YedQ operates independently of CsgD and AdrA in E. coli 1094. This alternative pathway underscores the diversity of regulatory mechanisms for cellulose synthesis among different bacterial strains .

Table 1: Key Features of YedQ and Its Role in Cellulose Synthesis

FeatureDescription
Protein DomainGGDEF domain
FunctionDiguanylate cyclase; synthesizes c-di-GMP
Role in Cellulose SynthesisEssential for cellulose production in E. coli 1094
Biofilm FormationCritical for maintaining biofilm structure
Regulatory PathwayIndependent of CsgD/AdrA pathway

Table 2: Effects of YedQ Deletion and Complementation in E. coli 1094

ConditionPhenotype
Wild TypeNormal cellulose synthesis and biofilm formation
yedQ DeletionImpaired cellulose synthesis and biofilm formation
yedQ ComplementationRestores cellulose synthesis and biofilm formation

References

  1. A CsgD-Independent Pathway for Cellulose Production and Biofilm Formation in E. coli 1094. Journal of Bacteriology, 2006.

  2. A CsgD-Independent Pathway for Cellulose Production and Biofilm Formation. Journal of Bacteriology, 2006.

  3. Biology of Biofilms. National Academic Digital Library of Ethiopia.

  4. Bacterial Cellulose Biosynthesis: Diversity of Operons, Subunits, and Functions. PLOS ONE, 2015.

  5. A CsgD-Independent Pathway for Cellulose Production and Biofilm Formation. Journal of Bacteriology.

  6. YedQ - Diguanylate Cyclase. UniProtKB.

  7. Multicellular String-Like Structure Formation by Salmonella. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2020.

  8. Characterization of Cellulose Production in Escherichia coli Nissle 1917. PubMed.

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and may serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us; we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
dgcQ; yedQ; SF2000; S2095; Putative diguanylate cyclase DgcQ; DGC; Cellulose synthesis regulatory protein
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-569
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Shigella flexneri
Target Names
dgcQ
Target Protein Sequence
MGVVRVQHETKMENQSWLKKLARRLGPGHVVNLCFIVVLLFSTLLTWREVVVLEDAYISS QRNHLENVANALDKHLQYNVDKLIFLRNGMREALVAPLDFTSLRNAVTEFEQHRDEHAWQ IELNRRRTLPVNGVSDALVSEGNFLSRENESLDNEITAALEVGYLLRLAHNSSSMVEQAM YVSRAGFYVSTQPTLFTRNVPTRYYGYVTQPWFIGHSQRENRHRAVRWFTSQPEHASNTE PQVTVSVPVDSNNYWYGVLGMSIPVRTMQQFLRNAIDKNLDGEYQLYDSKLRFLTSSNPD HPTGNIFDPRELALLAQAMEHDTRGGIRMDSRYVSWERLDHFDGVLARVHTLSEGVRGDF GSISIALTLLWALFTTMLLLSWYVIRRMVSNMYVLQSSLQWQAWHDTLTRLYNRGALFEK ARPLAKLCQTHQHPFSVIQVDLDHFKAINDRFGHQAGDRVLSHAAGLISSSLRAQDVAGR VGGEEFCVILPGANLTQAAEVAERIRLKLNEKEMLIAKSTTIRISASLGVSSSEETGDYD FEQLQSLADRRLYLAKQAGRNRVFASDNA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

This recombinant putative cellulose synthesis regulatory protein (YedQ) catalyzes the synthesis of cyclic-di-GMP (c-di-GMP) from two GTP molecules. c-di-GMP acts as a second messenger regulating cell surface characteristics in bacteria, including cellulose production.

Database Links

KEGG: sfl:SF2000

Subcellular Location
Cell inner membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the molecular function of YedQ protein?

YedQ functions as a diguanylate cyclase (DGC) that synthesizes cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP), a ubiquitous bacterial second messenger. YedQ contains the characteristic GGDEF domain required for DGC activity. Studies have confirmed that YedQ serves as a primary c-di-GMP producer, particularly in minimal media conditions . The protein's activity directly influences several bacterial behaviors including motility, biofilm formation, and cellulose production. YedQ contributes to c-di-GMP production through a pathway that is independent of the CsgD-regulated AdrA pathway, which was previously identified as another route for cellulose production .

What phenotypic changes are observed in yedQ deletion mutants?

Deletion of the yedQ gene results in several observable phenotypic changes in bacterial behavior:

  • Increased biofilm formation - Studies have shown that yedQ deletion mutants exhibit significantly increased biofilm formation compared to wild-type strains in both rich and minimal media. In one study with E. coli, the yedQ mutant demonstrated a 12-fold increase in biofilm formation in rich media and a 6-fold increase in minimal media after 7 hours of incubation .

  • Altered multicellular structure formation - In Salmonella, deletion of yedQ abrogated string formation in M9 media supplemented with Bipd and greatly reduced string formation in M9 media supplemented with DTT, indicating that YedQ plays a critical role in multicellular aggregation behaviors .

  • Changes in extracellular DNA (eDNA) production - Mutations in yedQ lead to increased eDNA in the extracellular matrix, with approximately 1.8-fold higher eDNA levels observed in yedQ mutants compared to wild-type strains .

How is yedQ gene expression typically verified in experimental settings?

Verification of yedQ gene expression is commonly performed using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The procedure typically involves:

  • RNA extraction from bacterial cultures

  • cDNA synthesis through reverse transcription

  • Quantitative PCR using specific primers targeting the yedQ gene

  • Normalization to reference control genes (such as rrlC)

  • Analysis using the 2^(-ΔΔCT) method to determine fold changes in expression

For verification of gene deletions, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is commonly employed using specific primers. For example, primers "yedQ front" (5′-GAGTGTCGTTGGTATGACGGTTAC-3′) and "yedQ rev" (5′-GTTCCCAGCTAACATAGCGACT-3′) have been used to verify yedQ deletion in E. coli strains .

What are the optimal growth conditions for studying YedQ function?

The optimal conditions for studying YedQ function depend on the specific aspect of its activity being investigated. Based on published literature:

  • Media selection:

    • For studying basic YedQ function, both Luria-Bertani (LB) and minimal media (such as M9) supplemented with 0.4% casamino acids (M9C) have been used successfully .

    • M9 minimal media with specific supplements (DTT or Bipd) has been shown to be particularly effective for examining YedQ's role in multicellular structure formation .

  • Temperature and incubation conditions:

    • Most experiments are conducted at 37°C, which is standard for E. coli and Salmonella studies.

    • For biofilm assays, quiescent (non-shaking) incubation is preferred to allow proper attachment and matrix development .

  • Timeframes:

    • Early biofilm formation assays are typically conducted over 7-24 hours .

    • For gene expression studies, sampling at different growth phases provides comprehensive insights into temporal regulation patterns.

What methods are used to quantify c-di-GMP levels in relation to YedQ activity?

Several methodologies have been employed to quantify c-di-GMP levels in bacterial cells to understand YedQ activity:

  • Direct measurement from cell extracts:

    • Extraction of c-di-GMP from planktonic cultures or biofilms

    • Quantification using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

  • Reporter-based systems:

    • Using c-di-GMP-responsive promoters fused to reporter genes (like lacZ or gfp)

    • Monitoring changes in reporter activity as a proxy for c-di-GMP levels

  • In vitro enzymatic assays:

    • Purification of recombinant YedQ protein

    • Measurement of diguanylate cyclase activity through production of c-di-GMP from GTP substrates

    • Analysis using thin-layer chromatography or HPLC

It's important to note that while single mutant studies have shown phenotypic changes, some research has not detected significant differences in total c-di-GMP concentrations in yeaI, yedQ, and yfiN single mutants compared to wild-type strains, suggesting potential localized effects of these DGCs rather than global changes in c-di-GMP pools .

How are biofilm assays typically conducted to assess YedQ function?

Biofilm assays to assess YedQ function typically follow standardized protocols with specific considerations:

  • Crystal violet biofilm assay:

    • Cultures are inoculated in 96-well polystyrene plates at an initial turbidity (OD600) of approximately 0.05

    • Plates are incubated quiescently (without shaking) for 7-24 hours

    • Wells are washed to remove planktonic cells

    • Biofilms are stained with crystal violet (0.1%)

    • Crystal violet is solubilized with ethanol or acetic acid

    • Absorbance is measured to quantify biofilm biomass

  • Experimental design considerations:

    • Multiple biological replicates (at least two independent cultures)

    • Multiple technical replicates (12 or more replicate wells per strain)

    • Inclusion of appropriate controls (wild-type strain and other relevant mutants)

    • Testing in different media conditions (LB and M9C) to assess nutritional influences

    • Assessment at different time points (e.g., 7 hours for early biofilm formation and 24 hours for mature biofilms)

  • Common complementation approaches:

    • Expression of yedQ from plasmids (such as pCA24N-yedQ) in deletion mutants

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of key residues to confirm the importance of specific domains for function

How does YedQ interact with other diguanylate cyclases in regulating bacterial behaviors?

The interaction between YedQ and other diguanylate cyclases (DGCs) represents a complex regulatory network:

  • Overlapping and distinct functions:

    • Studies have shown that YedQ and YfiN have partially overlapping functions in multicellular string formation. While single deletion of yedQ greatly reduces string formation, complete abrogation occurs in yedQ/yfiN double mutants, suggesting that YfiN partially contributes to this process .

    • YedQ operates in a pathway independent of AdrA (another DGC), as suggested by studies of cellulose production pathways. This indicates distinct regulatory mechanisms for different DGCs .

  • Hierarchical importance:

    • YedQ has been identified as the primary c-di-GMP producer in minimal media conditions, with YfiN playing a secondary role. This aligns with previous reports indicating that these two DGCs are particularly important in minimal media environments .

  • Environmental condition-specific activities:

    • YedQ's relative importance compared to other DGCs varies depending on environmental conditions. For instance, YfiN has been shown to be particularly active under reductive stress conditions in E. coli, while YedQ appears to have broader functionality .

For comprehensive analysis of these interactions, double and triple mutant strains can be constructed via P1 transduction, with verification of the deletions using PCR with specific primers for each gene .

What are the challenges in interpreting c-di-GMP measurements in relation to YedQ function?

Several challenges exist in interpreting c-di-GMP measurements and relating them to YedQ function:

  • Subcellular localization and compartmentalization:

    • Research has shown discrepancies between phenotypic changes and global c-di-GMP levels. For example, while yedQ deletion significantly impacts biofilm formation, some studies have not detected significant differences in total c-di-GMP concentrations in cell extracts of mutants versus wild-type strains .

    • This suggests that YedQ may produce localized pools of c-di-GMP that affect specific cellular processes without dramatically altering the total cellular concentration.

  • Temporal regulation:

    • c-di-GMP levels fluctuate throughout growth phases and in response to environmental stimuli.

    • Single time-point measurements may not capture the dynamic nature of c-di-GMP regulation by YedQ.

  • Methodology limitations:

    • Direct measurement techniques like LC-MS require cell disruption, potentially disturbing the natural state of c-di-GMP pools.

    • Reporter-based systems may not have sufficient sensitivity to detect subtle changes in localized c-di-GMP concentrations.

  • Redundancy among DGCs:

    • With 29 GGDEF domain-containing proteins in E. coli alone, redundancy and compensatory mechanisms may mask the effects of single gene deletions.

    • Researchers often need to create multiple deletion strains to observe clear phenotypes.

How can contradictory data on YedQ function between different bacterial species be reconciled?

Reconciling contradictory data on YedQ function between different bacterial species requires careful consideration of several factors:

  • Species-specific regulatory networks:

    • While YedQ is conserved across many bacteria, its role within regulatory networks may differ. For example, in Salmonella, YedQ has been shown to be critical for multicellular string formation , while in E. coli, its deletion actually increases early biofilm formation .

    • These differences likely reflect variations in the larger regulatory networks controlling c-di-GMP signaling and biofilm formation in these organisms.

  • Experimental condition variations:

    • Differences in media composition, temperature, and other growth conditions can significantly impact YedQ activity and the resulting phenotypes.

    • Standardizing experimental conditions when comparing across species is essential.

  • Methodological approaches to reconcile contradictions:

    • Cross-species complementation studies: Expressing yedQ from one species in the deletion mutant of another species to assess functional conservation.

    • Domain swapping experiments to identify regions responsible for species-specific functions.

    • Comparative genomics to identify differences in potential interaction partners or regulatory elements.

  • Timing considerations:

    • The observed effects of YedQ may differ depending on the stage of biofilm development being examined. For instance, some studies focus on early biofilm formation (7 hours), while others examine mature biofilms (24 hours or longer) .

What statistical approaches are recommended for analyzing yedQ mutant phenotypes?

When analyzing phenotypic data from yedQ mutant studies, the following statistical approaches are recommended:

  • For biofilm assays:

    • Use multiple biological replicates (minimum of 2-3 independent cultures)

    • Include 8-12 technical replicates per biological replicate

    • Apply appropriate statistical tests such as Student's t-test for comparing two strains or ANOVA followed by post-hoc tests (such as Tukey's HSD) when comparing multiple strains

    • Report data as mean ± standard deviation or standard error of the mean

    • Consider data normalization to wild-type values for easier interpretation of fold changes

  • For gene expression studies:

    • Analyze qRT-PCR data using the 2^(-ΔΔCT) method

    • Include at least three technical replicates per sample

    • Use appropriate reference genes for normalization (such as rrlC or other housekeeping genes with stable expression)

    • Apply statistical tests to determine significant differences in expression levels

  • For growth rate analysis:

    • Measure optical density (OD600) at multiple time points during growth

    • Calculate specific growth rates using linear regression of log-transformed data

    • Compare growth rates using appropriate statistical tests to ensure that observed phenotypes are not due to growth defects

How should researchers address potential pleiotropic effects when studying yedQ mutants?

Addressing pleiotropic effects is crucial when studying yedQ mutants, as c-di-GMP signaling affects multiple cellular processes:

  • Comprehensive phenotypic characterization:

    • Beyond the primary phenotype of interest (e.g., biofilm formation), researchers should assess multiple phenotypes including motility, cellular morphology, extracellular matrix production, and stress responses.

    • This comprehensive approach helps distinguish direct effects of YedQ from indirect consequences.

  • Complementation studies:

    • Express yedQ from an inducible promoter in the deletion mutant

    • Titrate expression levels to determine dose-dependent effects

    • Include appropriate controls such as empty vector controls

    • Use site-directed mutagenesis to create catalytically inactive variants (e.g., mutations in the GGDEF motif) as negative controls

  • Gene expression profiling:

    • Use RNA-seq or microarray analysis to identify genes differentially expressed in yedQ mutants

    • Pathway enrichment analysis can help identify biological processes affected by yedQ deletion

    • Validate key findings using qRT-PCR and additional phenotypic assays

  • Separate analysis of individual phenotypes:

    • For example, separately quantify extracellular DNA (eDNA) and polysaccharides in the biofilm matrix to determine which components are specifically affected by yedQ deletion

What are the most effective experimental controls for yedQ functional studies?

Designing appropriate controls is essential for robust yedQ functional studies:

Control TypeExamplePurpose
Genetic controlsWild-type parent strain (e.g., BW25113 for Keio collection mutants)Baseline comparison for all phenotypes
Single gene deletions of other DGCs (e.g., yeaI, yfiN)Distinguish YedQ-specific effects from general DGC effects
Double mutants (e.g., yeaI yedQ, yedQ yfiN)Assess functional redundancy or interaction
Site-directed mutants (e.g., mutations in GGDEF motif)Confirm importance of catalytic activity
Expression controlsEmpty vector (e.g., pCA24N)Control for plasmid maintenance effects
Vector expressing inactive YedQControl for protein overexpression effects
Complemented mutant (yedQ mutant with plasmid-expressed YedQ)Confirm phenotype is due to yedQ deletion
Experimental controlsMedia-only wells in biofilm assaysBackground subtraction
Wells with non-biofilm forming strainNegative control for biofilm assays
Growth curves in parallel with biofilm assaysEnsure phenotypes aren't due to growth defects
Multiple time points (7h, 24h)Distinguish early vs. mature biofilm effects
Multiple media conditions (LB, M9C)Assess nutritional influences on phenotypes

Implementing these controls helps ensure that observed phenotypes are specifically attributed to YedQ function rather than experimental artifacts or secondary effects .

How is structural analysis being used to understand YedQ function?

Structural analysis provides valuable insights into YedQ function and regulation:

  • Domain architecture analysis:

    • YedQ contains a GGDEF domain responsible for diguanylate cyclase activity

    • The GGDEF domain features the characteristic GGDEF/GGEEF motif required for GTP binding and catalysis

    • Structural predictions suggest potential regulatory domains in the N-terminal region

  • Site-directed mutagenesis approaches:

    • Mutation of key residues in the GGDEF motif (particularly the second glutamic acid) abolishes cyclase activity

    • For example, similar approaches with the related DGC YeaI demonstrated that changing the glutamic acid in the EGEVF motif (E407A mutation) significantly affected its function

    • Such mutations can be created using primers with site-specific modifications followed by PCR amplification and verification through sequencing

  • Structural basis for specificity:

    • Comparative structural analysis between YedQ and other DGCs helps explain their differential activities under various conditions

    • Understanding structural differences that contribute to YedQ's primary role in minimal media compared to other DGCs

  • Protein-protein interaction studies:

    • Co-immunoprecipitation and bacterial two-hybrid systems are being used to identify proteins that interact with YedQ

    • These interactions may explain the localized effects of YedQ-produced c-di-GMP pools

What are the emerging techniques for studying YedQ's role in c-di-GMP signaling networks?

Several cutting-edge approaches are being applied to better understand YedQ's role in c-di-GMP signaling:

  • CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing:

    • More precise creation of mutants with minimal polar effects

    • Ability to make subtle mutations in the native gene context

    • Creation of tagged versions of YedQ for localization and interaction studies

  • Fluorescent biosensors for c-di-GMP:

    • Development of genetically encoded biosensors that can report on c-di-GMP levels in living cells

    • These biosensors enable real-time monitoring of c-di-GMP dynamics in response to environmental changes

    • Can potentially detect localized pools of c-di-GMP produced by specific DGCs like YedQ

  • Single-cell analysis techniques:

    • Flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy to examine population heterogeneity in YedQ expression and activity

    • Single-cell RNA-seq to identify cell-to-cell variations in transcriptional responses to YedQ-mediated signaling

  • Integrative multi-omics approaches:

    • Combining transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data to build comprehensive models of YedQ's regulatory networks

    • Network analysis to identify key nodes and potential feedback mechanisms in c-di-GMP signaling pathways

  • In situ visualization techniques:

    • Immunofluorescence microscopy to visualize YedQ localization within bacterial cells

    • Super-resolution microscopy to examine the spatial organization of YedQ in relation to other components of the c-di-GMP signaling network

How do environmental signals regulate YedQ activity in different bacterial species?

Understanding environmental regulation of YedQ activity remains an active area of research:

  • Redox state regulation:

    • YedQ activity appears to be influenced by reductive stress conditions, as evidenced by its role in string formation in media supplemented with reducing agents like DTT

    • The related DGC YfiN has been specifically shown to respond to reductive stress in E. coli, and YedQ may have similar sensory mechanisms

  • Nutritional regulation:

    • YedQ shows differential importance in minimal versus rich media, suggesting nutritional cues affect its activity

    • YedQ and YfiN have been identified as the only two DGCs particularly important in minimal media conditions

  • Stress response integration:

    • Studies suggest YedQ activity may be modulated during various stress responses, including oxidative stress and antimicrobial challenges

    • The exact mechanisms linking specific stressors to YedQ activity changes remain to be fully elucidated

  • Species-specific regulatory mechanisms:

    • While YedQ function is somewhat conserved across different bacteria, the upstream signals and regulatory mechanisms may differ significantly between species

    • For example, the environmental cues triggering YedQ activity in Salmonella may differ from those in E. coli, explaining some of the species-specific phenotypes observed

  • Potential signal sensing domains:

    • Analysis of YedQ's N-terminal region may reveal domains involved in sensing specific environmental signals

    • Chimeric protein studies, where the catalytic GGDEF domain is fused to different sensing domains, can help elucidate the signaling specificity

What are the most significant unresolved questions regarding YedQ function?

Despite significant progress in understanding YedQ, several important questions remain unresolved:

  • Signal specificity:

    • What environmental signals specifically activate or inhibit YedQ activity?

    • How does YedQ distinguish its regulatory inputs from those affecting other DGCs?

  • Subcellular localization:

    • Is YedQ activity spatially restricted within the cell?

    • How does the localization of YedQ contribute to the formation of localized c-di-GMP pools?

  • Regulatory mechanisms:

    • What post-translational modifications regulate YedQ activity?

    • Are there specific proteins that directly interact with YedQ to modulate its function?

  • Evolutionary significance:

    • Why have bacteria maintained multiple DGCs like YedQ with seemingly redundant biochemical functions?

    • How has YedQ function diverged across different bacterial species?

  • Therapeutic potential:

    • Can YedQ be targeted to modulate biofilm formation in pathogenic bacteria?

    • What structural features might make YedQ a suitable target for antimicrobial development?

What methodological approaches show the most promise for advancing our understanding of YedQ?

Several methodological approaches show particular promise for advancing YedQ research:

  • High-throughput screening approaches:

    • Screening of compound libraries to identify small molecule modulators of YedQ activity

    • Genetic screens to identify novel interaction partners or regulatory elements

  • Advanced microscopy techniques:

    • Super-resolution microscopy to visualize YedQ localization at the nanoscale

    • Time-lapse microscopy to monitor dynamic changes in YedQ activity

  • Systems biology approaches:

    • Mathematical modeling of c-di-GMP signaling networks incorporating YedQ activity

    • Multi-omics data integration to build comprehensive models of YedQ regulation

  • Structural biology:

    • Cryo-electron microscopy to determine high-resolution structures of YedQ in different activity states

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to understand conformational changes associated with YedQ activation

  • In vivo studies:

    • Animal models of infection to assess the importance of YedQ in pathogenesis

    • Competition assays between wild-type and yedQ mutant strains to evaluate fitness effects in complex environments

How might YedQ research contribute to broader understanding of bacterial regulation?

YedQ research has potential to contribute significantly to our understanding of bacterial regulation in several ways:

  • Signal integration mechanisms:

    • YedQ provides a model for understanding how bacteria integrate multiple environmental signals through second messenger networks

    • Insights from YedQ may reveal general principles about how bacteria coordinate complex behaviors

  • Biofilm biology:

    • Understanding YedQ's role in biofilm regulation contributes to our fundamental knowledge of this ubiquitous bacterial lifestyle

    • This knowledge may inform strategies for controlling biofilms in medical and industrial settings

  • Evolution of regulatory networks:

    • Comparative studies of YedQ across bacterial species can illuminate how regulatory networks evolve and diversify

    • The apparent functional redundancy among DGCs raises interesting questions about selection pressures maintaining multiple enzymes with similar biochemical activities

  • Principles of localized signaling:

    • YedQ research suggests that bacteria, despite lacking membrane-bound organelles, can achieve spatially restricted signaling

    • This challenges traditional views of bacterial cells as homogeneous reaction vessels

  • Novel therapeutic strategies:

    • Insights into YedQ function may lead to innovative approaches for modulating bacterial behaviors without selecting for resistance

    • Targeting c-di-GMP signaling through YedQ could provide alternatives to conventional antibiotics

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.