Recombinant Putative inactive phenolphthiocerol synthesis polyketide synthase type I Pks1 (pks1), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of Pks1 in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex (MTBC)

Recombinant putative inactive phenolphthiocerol synthesis polyketide synthase type I Pks1 (pks1), partial refers to a genetically engineered, truncated form of the Pks1 enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of phenolphthiocerol, a lipid moiety critical for phenolic glycolipid (PGL) production in Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( Mtb ). Pks1 is part of the PDIM + PGL locus, which includes ppsA-E and pks15/1 genes encoding type I polyketide synthases (PKS) . In some MTBC strains, frameshift mutations in pks15/1 split it into pks15 and pks1, rendering the enzyme inactive and halting PGL synthesis .

Key Domains and Mutations

  • Domains: Pks1 encodes ketoreductase (KR), dehydratase (DH), enoyl reductase (ER), acyltransferase (AT), and acyl carrier protein (ACP) domains .

  • Frameshift Mutations: Strains like Mtb H37Rv and M. bovis exhibit a 7 bp or 1 bp deletion in pks15/1, splitting it into pks15 and pks1. This disrupts the enzyme’s functionality, leading to PGL deficiency .

Transcriptional Regulation

  • Co-Expression: pks1 is co-expressed with fadD22, Rv2949c, and lppX under stress conditions (e.g., acidic pH, antibiotic exposure) but downregulated during hypoxia or iron limitation .

  • Sigma Factors: σ<sup>D</sup> positively regulates pks1, while σ<sup>B</sup> and σ<sup>E</sup> suppress its expression .

Phenolphthiocerol Synthesis Pathway

Pks1 collaborates with Pks15 to elongate p-hydroxybenzoic acid (p-HBA) into p-hydroxyphenylalkanoates, precursors for phenolphthiocerol. Key steps include:

  1. Activation of p-HBA by FadD22 (p-hydroxybenzoyl-AMP ligase).

  2. Chain elongation by Pks15/1 using malonyl-CoA .

Gene Disruption Studies

Strain/ModelGenetic ModificationOutcomeSource
Mtb H37Rvpks1 disruptionAbolished synthesis of dimycocerosyl phthiocerol (DIM) and attenuated virulence in mice
M. bovis BCGpks15/1 complementationRestored phenolphthiocerol glycolipid production
Mtb lineage 3, 4, 5, 7Proteomic analysisDetected inactive Pks1 in lineage-specific lipid biosynthesis pathways

Regulatory Interactions

RegulatorEffect on pks1Associated Pathways
σ<sup>D</sup>PositiveStress response (pH, antibiotics)
σ<sup>B</sup>NegativeHypoxia, dormancy
Rv2949cCo-expressionp-HBA activation

Implications for Drug Development

  • Target Validation: Inactive Pks1 in recombinant studies highlights its role in lipid virulence factors, making it a candidate for antimycobacterial therapies .

  • Lineage-Specific Variation: Differential Pks1 activity across MTBC lineages suggests adaptive evolution under host pressures .

Research Gaps and Future Directions

  • Structural Studies: Detailed crystallography of recombinant Pks1 domains is needed to map catalytic residues.

  • Host-Pathogen Dynamics: How Pks1 inactivation impacts immune evasion remains unclear.

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will typically ship the format we have in stock. If you have specific format requirements, please note them when ordering, and we will fulfill your request.
Lead Time
Delivery time varies depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for a precise delivery time. All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. If dry ice shipment is required, please contact us in advance, as additional charges will apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to collect contents at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C is recommended. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50% for reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Generally, the liquid form has a shelf life of 6 months at -20°C/-80°C, while the lyophilized form has a shelf life of 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receiving. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process. If you require a specific tag type, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
pks1; Rv2946c; Putative inactive phenolphthiocerol synthesis polyketide synthase type I Pks1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (strain ATCC 25618 / H37Rv)
Target Names
pks1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
May be involved in phthiocerol biosynthesis.
Database Links

KEGG: mtu:Rv2946c

STRING: 83332.Rv2946c

Q&A

What is Pks1 and what functional roles does it play across different organisms?

Pks1 (Polyketide Synthase 1) is a versatile type I polyketide synthase enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of complex polyketide compounds through sequential condensation reactions. Its function varies significantly across species:

In fungi like Colletotrichum lagenarium, PKS1 is essential for melanin biosynthesis. The PKS1 gene product participates in pentaketide biosynthesis and cyclization during the melanin production pathway. Notably, albino mutants lacking functional Pks1 (Pks-) form nonmelanized appressoria with reduced penetrating ability on host plants .

In mycobacteria such as M. tuberculosis, Pks1 functions in the biosynthetic pathway for phenolphthiocerol production. When intact with Pks15 as a single gene (pks15/1), it participates in producing phenolglycolipids (PGLs), important virulence factors. The enzyme specifically elongates p-hydroxybenzoyl-AMP with malonyl-CoA in a reaction comprising eight to nine elongation cycles .

In green algae such as Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, PKS1 (Cre10.g449750) encodes a giant enzyme (2.3 MDa) that plays a crucial role in zygospore maturation. The enzyme is specifically induced in 2-day-old zygotes and is required for the development of knob-like structures (~50 nm diameter) at the cell surface and the central cell wall layer formation. Mutant analyses have shown that PKS1 is essential for desiccation tolerance in zygotes .

What are the structural characteristics and functional domains of type I Pks1?

Type I Pks1 enzymes are large multifunctional proteins containing several catalytic domains organized in modules. Based on structural analyses, Pks1 contains these key domains:

  • β-ketoacyl synthase (KS): Catalyzes the condensation reaction between acyl and malonyl units

  • Acetyl/malonyl transferase (AT): Loads extender units onto the enzyme

  • Acyl carrier protein (ACP): Contains phosphopantetheine arm that holds growing polyketide chain

  • Keto reductase (KR): Reduces keto groups to hydroxyl groups

  • Dehydratase (DH): Dehydrates hydroxyl groups to form double bonds

  • Enoyl reductase (ER): Reduces double bonds to single bonds

In C. lagenarium, the PKS1 polypeptide consists of 2187 amino acids and shows significant similarities with other polyketide synthases, particularly that encoded by wA in Aspergillus nidulans, which is involved in conidial pigmentation .

In mycobacteria, the domain organization is split between pks15 and pks1: pks15 encodes the KS domain, while pks1 encodes KR, DH, ER, AT, and ACP domains. In PGL-producing strains, these exist as a single gene, while in PGL-deficient strains like H37Rv, they exist as separate open reading frames due to frameshift mutations .

How should researchers approach expression and purification of recombinant Pks1?

The expression and purification of recombinant Pks1 requires careful consideration of several factors due to its large size and complex structure:

Expression System Selection:

  • For partial Pks1 constructs, E. coli-based expression systems may be sufficient

  • For full-length Pks1 (especially the 2.3 MDa variant found in C. reinhardtii), consider eukaryotic expression systems such as yeast or insect cells

  • Codon optimization is essential when expressing across kingdoms

Purification Strategy:

  • Implement a multi-step purification approach:

    • Initial capture using affinity chromatography (His-tag or GST-tag)

    • Intermediate purification using ion exchange chromatography

    • Polishing step using size exclusion chromatography

Method Validation Parameters:
When developing purification protocols, researchers must validate their methods using the following criteria:

Validation ParameterDescriptionAcceptance Criteria
SpecificityAbility to measure Pks1 in presence of impuritiesNo significant interference from impurities
LinearityLinear relationship between concentration and responseR² > 0.98 across concentration range
RangeInterval between upper and lower levels with accuracy and precisionDetermined based on intended application
PrecisionCloseness of agreement between measurementsRSD < 15%
ReproducibilityResults across different labs/operatorsRSD < 20%
RobustnessReliability with small variations in method parametersMethod remains unaffected by small changes

For validation of analytical methods, researchers should follow standardized criteria including specificity, linearity, range, accuracy, precision, detection limit, quantitation limit, and robustness .

How do mutations in the pks1 gene affect phenotype across different model organisms?

Mutations in pks1 produce organism-specific phenotypic effects that provide valuable insights into its function:

In Colletotrichum lagenarium:

  • Albino mutants (Pks-) form nonmelanized appressoria

  • Display significantly reduced penetrating ability on host plants

  • Show defects in pentaketide biosynthesis and/or cyclization during melanin biosynthesis

  • Transformation with functional PKS1 gene restores wild-type melanin phenotype

In Chlamydomonas reinhardtii:

In Mycobacterium tuberculosis:

  • In PGL-deficient strains (e.g., H37Rv, Erdman), a 7 bp deletion in some Mtb strains or a 1 bp deletion in some Mb strains causes a frameshift that splits pks15 and pks1 into separate ORFs

  • This splitting results in loss of phenolglycolipid (PGL) production, which affects virulence characteristics

  • Strains with intact pks15/1 (single gene) maintain PGL production capability

These phenotypic effects demonstrate the essential role of Pks1 in specialized metabolite production across diverse taxonomic groups, highlighting its evolutionary importance in stress response, virulence, and reproductive processes.

What transcriptional regulatory mechanisms control pks1 expression?

The transcriptional regulation of pks1 involves complex interactions with multiple regulatory factors, as evidenced by transcriptome analyses:

In Mycobacterium tuberculosis:
Sigma factors play crucial roles in regulating pks1 expression:

  • σD positively regulates pks1, pks15, and fadD22

  • σB and σE exert negative regulation at an upper level

  • Additional positive regulation comes from Rv0042c, sigK, Rv2258c, and Rv3557c

  • Negative regulation is also provided by Rv2745c and Rv3583c

  • The transcription factor Rv3830c binds to pks1 without causing differential expression

Operon Structure and Co-regulated Genes:
RNA-seq data analysis reveals that pks1 is highly correlated with several genes including:

  • fadD22: encodes p-hydroxybenzoyl-AMP ligase

  • Rv2949c: catalyzes formation of p-hydroxybenzoic acid

  • lppX: involved in translocation of PDIM to outer membrane

  • fadD29: fatty acyl-AMP ligase

  • pks6 and pks12: other polyketide synthases

Environmental Response Patterns:
Genes involved in phenolphthiocerol and phenolglycolipid production show dynamic expression patterns:

  • Up-regulation upon acidic pH exposure

  • Up-regulation during antibiotic exposure

  • Down-regulation under hypoxic conditions

  • Down-regulation during dormancy

  • Down-regulation under low/high iron concentration

The table below summarizes the regulatory factors affecting pks1 expression in M. tuberculosis:

Regulatory FactorEffect on pks1Mechanism
σDPositive regulationDirect transcriptional activation
σBNegative regulationUpper-level suppression
σENegative regulationUpper-level suppression
Rv0042cPositive regulationTranscriptional activation
sigKPositive regulationTranscriptional activation
Rv2258cPositive regulationTranscriptional activation
Rv3557cPositive regulationTranscriptional activation
Rv2745cNegative regulationTranscriptional repression
Rv3583cNegative regulationTranscriptional repression
Rv3830cBinding without DEUnknown - possible conditional regulator

What experimental approaches can elucidate the biochemical function of putative inactive Pks1 variants?

Investigating putative inactive Pks1 variants requires multifaceted experimental approaches:

Structural Analysis Techniques:

  • X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy to determine three-dimensional structure

  • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to assess protein dynamics

  • Circular dichroism to evaluate secondary structure content

  • Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) for low-resolution structural information

Functional Domain Assessment:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of key catalytic residues in each domain

  • Domain-swapping experiments with active Pks1 variants

  • In vitro reconstitution of enzymatic activity using purified domains

  • Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to measure substrate binding

Comparative Expression Studies:

  • Transcriptome analysis under different conditions

  • Quantitative proteomics to measure protein abundance

  • Metabolomic profiling to identify changes in metabolite patterns

In vivo Phenotypic Characterization:

  • Complementation studies with wild-type and mutant Pks1 variants

  • Creation of chimeric proteins and assessment of their function

  • Subcellular localization studies using fluorescent protein fusions

  • Protein-protein interaction studies using co-immunoprecipitation or yeast two-hybrid assays

The experimental design should follow systematic validation criteria, ensuring that results are reliable and reproducible. Researchers must evaluate precision (repeatability and intermediate precision), specificity, linearity, range, accuracy, detection/quantitation limits, and robustness .

How can researchers design experiments to elucidate the role of Pks1 in stress response mechanisms?

Based on findings in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii where Pks1 is crucial for zygospore desiccation tolerance , researchers can employ the following experimental design approaches:

Genetic Manipulation Studies:

  • Generate precise pks1 mutants using CRISPR-Cas9 or similar gene editing technologies

  • Create conditional knockouts using inducible promoters to control Pks1 expression

  • Develop reporter systems (e.g., fluorescent proteins) under the control of the pks1 promoter

Stress Exposure Experiments:

  • Subject wild-type and pks1 mutant organisms to controlled stress conditions:

    • Desiccation gradients

    • Temperature extremes

    • Oxidative stress challenges

    • pH fluctuations

    • Nutrient limitation

Molecular Response Analysis:

  • Conduct time-course RNA-seq to track transcriptional changes

  • Perform metabolomic profiling to identify stress-induced metabolites

  • Use proteomics to detect post-translational modifications

  • Implement ChIP-seq to identify transcription factors regulating pks1

Morphological and Ultrastructural Assessment:

  • Employ electron microscopy to visualize cell wall changes

  • Use atomic force microscopy to measure physical properties of cell surfaces

  • Implement Raman spectroscopy to characterize chemical composition of protective structures

Experimental Design Matrix:

Stress ConditionGenotypeTime PointsPrimary MeasurementsSecondary Analyses
DesiccationWT, pks10h, 6h, 24h, 72hSurvival rate, Water contentTranscriptomics, Cell wall composition
Temperature stressWT, pks10h, 2h, 8h, 24hHeat shock protein expressionMetabolomics, Membrane integrity
Oxidative stressWT, pks10h, 1h, 4h, 12hROS levels, Antioxidant activityLipidomics, Protein carbonylation
pH stressWT, pks10h, 3h, 12h, 36hIntracellular pH, Membrane potentialIon flux measurement, Proteomics

For statistical validation, employ method validation criteria including specificity (ability to distinguish between different stress responses), precision (repeatability of measurements), and robustness (consistency across different experimental conditions) .

What statistical approaches are recommended for validating Pks1 activity and expression data?

Proper statistical validation is crucial for generating reliable data on Pks1 activity and expression. Researchers should implement these approaches:

For Activity Assays:

  • Method Validation Parameters:

    • Specificity: Ensure the assay measures only Pks1 activity without interference

    • Linearity: Establish a linear relationship between enzyme concentration and activity

    • Range: Define the interval where measurements are accurate and precise

    • Precision: Assess repeatability (single-lab, one-day) and intermediate precision (multiple days, analysts)

    • Accuracy: Determine how close measured values are to true values

    • Detection/Quantitation Limits: Establish minimum detectable/quantifiable activity levels

    • Robustness: Evaluate method reliability when parameters vary slightly

  • Statistical Tests for Activity Data:

    • Use descriptive statistics (mean, median, standard deviation) to characterize central tendency and dispersion

    • Apply parametric tests (t-test, ANOVA) for normally distributed data

    • Implement non-parametric alternatives (Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis) for non-normal distributions

    • Calculate confidence intervals to estimate parameter precision

For Expression Data:

  • Transcriptome Analysis:

    • Normalize RNA-seq data using appropriate methods (RPKM, TPM, DESeq2)

    • Apply multiple testing correction (Benjamini-Hochberg) when identifying differentially expressed genes

    • Use clustering methods to identify co-regulated genes

    • Implement pathway enrichment analysis to identify affected biological processes

  • Validity and Reliability Considerations:

    • Ensure measurements are reliable (consistent) before validating them

    • Remember that measurements can be reliable but not valid

    • Validity requires measurements to accurately test what they claim to test

Decision Matrix for Statistical Test Selection:

Data CharacteristicSample SizeTest Type for Comparing GroupsTest for Correlation
Normal distribution, equal variancen ≥ 30t-test (2 groups), ANOVA (>2 groups)Pearson correlation
Normal distribution, unequal variancen ≥ 30Welch's t-testPearson correlation
Non-normal distributionAnyMann-Whitney (2 groups), Kruskal-Wallis (>2 groups)Spearman correlation
Paired measurementsAnyPaired t-test (normal), Wilcoxon signed-rank (non-normal)Depends on distribution

What are the critical considerations for analyzing structure-function relationships in large PKSs like Pks1?

Analyzing structure-function relationships in large polyketide synthases like Pks1 presents unique challenges due to their size, complexity, and multi-domain architecture:

Structural Analysis Challenges:

  • The exceptional size of Pks1 (2.3 MDa in C. reinhardtii) makes traditional structural determination methods difficult

  • Multiple functional domains must be analyzed both individually and as an integrated system

  • Conformational dynamics may play crucial roles in catalytic activity

Methodological Approaches:

Experimental Design Recommendations:

Analytical GoalPrimary MethodsComplementary ApproachesData Integration Strategy
Domain ArchitectureCryo-EM, Limited proteolysisComputational modeling, SAXSMolecular docking, Integrative modeling
Catalytic MechanismSite-directed mutagenesis, Activity assaysStructural analysis of reaction intermediatesQuantum mechanics/molecular mechanics simulations
Domain InteractionsCrosslinking-MS, FRETHydrogen-deuterium exchange MSNetwork analysis, Molecular dynamics
Substrate SpecificitySubstrate analog studies, Binding assaysComputational dockingStructure-activity relationship analysis

When designing validation experiments, researchers should ensure specificity, linearity, and precision while maintaining robust statistical analysis to generate reliable structure-function relationships .

How might understanding Pks1 function advance therapeutic strategies against pathogenic organisms?

Understanding Pks1 function has significant implications for developing novel therapeutic strategies against pathogens, particularly Mycobacterium tuberculosis:

Targeting Virulence Factors:

  • Pks1 participates in phenolphthiocerol and phenolglycolipid (PGL) production in M. tuberculosis

  • These compounds contribute to bacterial virulence and persistence

  • Inhibiting Pks1 could potentially attenuate pathogen virulence without directly killing bacteria, potentially reducing selective pressure for resistance

Drug Development Opportunities:

  • Structure-Based Drug Design:

    • High-resolution structural data of Pks1 could enable rational design of specific inhibitors

    • Targeting unique catalytic domains or interdomain interactions could provide selectivity

    • Virtual screening campaigns could identify lead compounds for further optimization

  • Combination Therapy Approaches:

    • Pks1 inhibitors could sensitize pathogens to existing antibiotics

    • Synergistic effects might be achieved by simultaneously targeting cell wall biosynthesis and Pks1-dependent pathways

  • Biomarker Development:

    • Pks1-dependent metabolites could serve as diagnostic biomarkers

    • Changes in these compounds might indicate treatment efficacy or disease progression

Experimental Research Framework:

Research PhaseKey QuestionsMethodological ApproachesExpected Outcomes
Target ValidationIs Pks1 essential for pathogenesis?In vivo infection models with pks1 mutantsConfirmation of Pks1 role in virulence
Inhibitor DiscoveryWhat compounds can inhibit Pks1?High-throughput screening, fragment-based approachesIdentification of lead compounds
Mechanism StudiesHow do inhibitors affect Pks1 function?Enzyme kinetics, structural biologyUnderstanding of inhibition mechanisms
In Vivo ValidationAre Pks1 inhibitors effective in animal models?Pharmacokinetics, efficacy studiesProof-of-concept for therapeutic potential

Researchers must validate their methods according to established criteria to ensure reproducibility and reliability of results across different laboratories and experimental conditions .

What comparative approaches can reveal evolutionary insights about Pks1 across different taxonomic groups?

Comparative analysis of Pks1 across diverse taxonomic groups can provide profound evolutionary insights:

Cross-Kingdom Comparative Analysis:

  • Pks1 functions in melanin biosynthesis in fungi like C. lagenarium

  • In mycobacteria, it participates in phenolphthiocerol production

  • In green algae like C. reinhardtii, it contributes to zygospore maturation

  • These diverse roles suggest either convergent evolution or ancient functional divergence

Methodological Approaches:

  • Phylogenetic Analysis:

    • Construct comprehensive phylogenetic trees using Pks1 sequences from diverse organisms

    • Map functional domains and their conservation across evolutionary distance

    • Identify lineage-specific adaptations and conserved core functions

    • Employ maximum likelihood or Bayesian methods with appropriate evolutionary models

  • Comparative Genomics:

    • Analyze genomic context of pks1 genes across species

    • Identify co-evolved gene clusters and operonic structures

    • Examine regulatory elements that control pks1 expression

    • Investigate horizontal gene transfer events that might have spread pks1

  • Structural Comparisons:

    • Compare three-dimensional structures of Pks1 domains across species

    • Identify structurally conserved regions despite sequence divergence

    • Map substrate-binding sites and catalytic residues

    • Correlate structural variations with functional differences

  • Experimental Validation:

    • Conduct domain-swapping experiments between Pks1 from different species

    • Test heterologous expression and complementation across species

    • Evaluate substrate specificity differences through biochemical assays

Comparative Analysis Framework:

Analysis LevelKey QuestionsMethodsExpected Insights
SequenceHow conserved is Pks1 across taxa?Multiple sequence alignment, Conservation scoringIdentification of universal vs. taxon-specific features
Domain ArchitectureDo domain organizations vary?Domain prediction, Architectural comparisonUnderstanding of functional modularity and evolution
Genomic ContextIs pks1 part of conserved gene clusters?Synteny analysis, Operon predictionInsights into co-evolution of metabolic pathways
FunctionAre functions conserved across taxa?Complementation studies, Activity assaysDetermination of functional conservation or divergence

This comparative approach requires rigorous validation to ensure reliability and reproducibility of results, applying the methodological validation criteria outlined in the statistical approaches section .

What are common challenges in expressing active recombinant Pks1 and how can they be addressed?

Expressing active recombinant Pks1 presents several challenges due to its large size and complex multi-domain structure. Here are common issues and their solutions:

Challenge 1: Low Expression Levels

  • Problem: Large proteins like Pks1 (2.3 MDa in C. reinhardtii) often express poorly

  • Solutions:

    • Optimize codon usage for the expression host

    • Use strong inducible promoters with tight regulation

    • Consider specialized expression strains with enhanced folding capacity

    • Express as separate domains and reconstitute activity in vitro

    • Reduce culture temperature during induction (20-25°C)

    • Add molecular chaperones as co-expression partners

Challenge 2: Protein Insolubility

  • Problem: Recombinant Pks1 often forms inclusion bodies

  • Solutions:

    • Express as fusion proteins with solubility-enhancing tags (MBP, SUMO)

    • Implement auto-induction media to slow protein production

    • Optimize buffer conditions with stabilizing additives

    • Use mild detergents to maintain solubility

    • Consider cell-free expression systems

Challenge 3: Lack of Post-translational Modifications

  • Problem: Bacterial expression systems lack necessary PTMs

  • Solutions:

    • Express in eukaryotic systems (yeast, insect cells, mammalian cells)

    • Co-express with phosphopantetheinyl transferases for ACP domain activation

    • Implement in vitro modification after purification

Challenge 4: Poor Activity/Stability

  • Problem: Purified protein shows limited activity or stability

  • Solutions:

    • Optimize buffer conditions (pH, salt, additives)

    • Add stabilizing ligands or substrates

    • Consider protein engineering to enhance stability

    • Screen different purification methods to minimize activity loss

    • Add protease inhibitors and reducing agents to prevent degradation

Optimization Matrix:

Expression ParameterVariable RangeMeasurement MethodSuccess Indicator
Induction temperature16-37°CSDS-PAGE, Western blotSoluble protein band at expected MW
Induction time2-24 hoursActivity assayFunctional enzyme production
Inducer concentration0.1-1.0 mM IPTGYield quantificationMaximum active protein per culture volume
Media compositionLB, TB, auto-inductionComparative expressionOptimal growth and expression conditions
Co-expression partnersChaperones, PPTasesActivity assayEnhanced solubility and activity

When developing expression protocols, researchers must validate their methods according to established criteria, ensuring specificity, precision, and robustness .

How can researchers resolve data inconsistencies when characterizing Pks1 function?

When characterizing Pks1 function, researchers may encounter conflicting or inconsistent data. Resolving these issues requires systematic troubleshooting:

Common Sources of Data Inconsistency:

  • Variation in enzyme activity due to post-translational modifications

  • Differences in experimental conditions across studies

  • Species-specific functions of Pks1 homologs

  • Presence of contaminating activities in enzyme preparations

  • Substrate availability and specificity issues

Systematic Resolution Approach:

  • Method Validation Assessment:

    • Evaluate whether methods meet validation criteria (specificity, linearity, precision)

    • Ensure proper controls are included in all experiments

    • Verify that statistical analyses are appropriate for the data distribution

    • Consider whether sample sizes provide sufficient statistical power

  • Cross-Verification Strategies:

    • Use multiple, orthogonal methods to measure the same parameter

    • Implement both in vitro and in vivo approaches to validate findings

    • Compare results across different model systems

    • Conduct inter-laboratory validation studies

  • Technical Troubleshooting:

    • Check for enzyme stability under assay conditions

    • Verify substrate purity and identity using analytical methods

    • Evaluate potential inhibitors or activators in reaction mixtures

    • Assess enzyme homogeneity using size exclusion chromatography

  • Experimental Design Refinement:

    • Implement factorial design to systematically test multiple variables

    • Use response surface methodology to optimize reaction conditions

    • Conduct time-course experiments to capture dynamic processes

    • Apply dose-response approaches to identify threshold effects

Decision Framework for Resolving Inconsistencies:

Type of InconsistencyDiagnostic ApproachResolution StrategyValidation Method
Activity variation between preparationsProtein quality assessmentStandardize purification protocolActivity per protein unit across batches
Contradictory phenotypes in different studiesGenetic background analysisUse isogenic strains, controlled conditionsPhenotype rescue experiments
Conflicting localization dataMultiple localization methodsCombine fluorescent tagging, fractionation, and immunolocalizationColocalization with known markers
Substrate specificity differencesComprehensive substrate panel testingDetermine kinetic parameters for each substrateStructure-activity relationship analysis
Species-specific functionsComparative functional analysisHeterologous expression and complementationCross-species activity assays

By implementing these approaches and maintaining rigorous validation standards, researchers can resolve data inconsistencies and develop a coherent understanding of Pks1 function across different experimental contexts and biological systems .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.