Substance-K receptor, scientifically designated as TACR2, is a protein encoded by the TACR2 gene in mammals. This receptor specifically binds to the tachykinin neuropeptide substance K, also known as neurokinin A. The receptor functions as part of the tachykinin receptor family and plays crucial roles in various physiological processes. TACR2 is associated with G proteins that activate a phosphatidylinositol-calcium second messenger system, facilitating signal transduction across cell membranes . The receptor has several alternative nomenclatures in scientific literature, including NK2-R, NK2R, NKNAR, SKR, and TAC2R, all referring to the same molecular entity that functions as the neurokinin A receptor .
The general structure of TACR2 reflects its function as a transmembrane receptor, with multiple domains responsible for ligand binding, signal transduction, and cellular localization. Understanding the molecular characteristics of this receptor provides insights into its physiological roles and potential therapeutic applications in various neurological and inflammatory conditions.
Recombinant Rabbit Substance-K receptor is produced using various expression systems, each offering distinct advantages for different research applications. The most common production method utilizes in vitro Escherichia coli expression systems, which provide high yields of recombinant protein suitable for multiple research applications . Alternative expression platforms include yeast-based systems, baculovirus-infected insect cells, mammalian cell culture systems, and in vivo biotinylation approaches in E. coli .
Each expression system imparts specific post-translational modifications and folding characteristics to the recombinant protein, potentially affecting its structural integrity and functional properties. The selection of an appropriate expression system depends on the intended research application, with mammalian cell-based production often preferred for studies requiring native-like receptor functionality and post-translational modifications.
Commercial suppliers offer various recombinant rabbit TACR2 products to meet diverse research needs. These products include both full-length and partial receptor proteins, each designed for specific experimental applications. Table 1 summarizes the available recombinant rabbit TACR2 products from one supplier:
Table 1: Commercially Available Recombinant Rabbit TACR2 Products
| Product Code | Product Name | Expression System |
|---|---|---|
| CSB-CF023069RB | Recombinant Rabbit Substance-K receptor (TACR2) | in vitro E.coli expression system |
| CSB-YP023069RB1 | Recombinant Rabbit Substance-K receptor (TACR2), partial | Yeast |
| CSB-EP023069RB1 | Recombinant Rabbit Substance-K receptor (TACR2), partial | E.coli |
| CSB-BP023069RB1 | Recombinant Rabbit Substance-K receptor (TACR2), partial | Baculovirus |
| CSB-MP023069RB1 | Recombinant Rabbit Substance-K receptor (TACR2), partial | Mammalian cell |
| CSB-EP023069RB1-B | Recombinant Rabbit Substance-K receptor (TACR2), partial | In Vivo Biotinylation in E.coli |
These products provide researchers with options for selecting the most appropriate form of recombinant rabbit TACR2 based on their specific experimental requirements and downstream applications .
Recombinant Rabbit Substance-K receptor serves as a crucial immunogen for developing antibodies against TACR2. These antibodies find applications in various immunological techniques, including Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunocytochemistry, and immunoprecipitation studies . The availability of recombinant rabbit TACR2 enables the production of species-specific antibodies that can be used to study receptor expression, localization, and regulation in rabbit tissues and cells.
The development of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies against rabbit TACR2 relies on purified recombinant proteins as immunogens. These antibodies subsequently serve as essential tools for detecting endogenous TACR2 expression in experimental rabbit models, facilitating research on neurological and inflammatory processes mediated by tachykinin signaling.
Recombinant TACR2 proteins provide valuable tools for studying receptor-ligand interactions, signal transduction mechanisms, and pharmacological modulation of receptor activity. The availability of purified recombinant rabbit TACR2 enables researchers to:
Perform binding assays to characterize the interaction between the receptor and its natural ligands or synthetic modulators
Investigate structure-function relationships through site-directed mutagenesis and functional assays
Screen potential therapeutic compounds that target TACR2 for treating neurological or inflammatory conditions
Study species-specific differences in receptor pharmacology and signaling
These functional studies contribute to our understanding of tachykinin signaling pathways and facilitate the development of novel therapeutic approaches targeting TACR2.
Rabbit models serve important roles in various research areas, including cardiovascular disease, inflammation, and neurological disorders. The availability of recombinant rabbit TACR2 supports these research efforts by providing tools for studying tachykinin signaling in rabbit-based experimental systems.
The use of species-matched recombinant proteins enhances the relevance and reproducibility of research findings in animal models. Recombinant rabbit TACR2, in particular, enables more accurate characterization of tachykinin signaling in rabbit models, reducing potential artifacts associated with cross-species reactivity.
Commercial recombinant rabbit TACR2 products undergo rigorous quality control measures to ensure purity, activity, and batch-to-batch consistency. These measures typically include:
Verification of protein identity through mass spectrometry or sequence analysis
Assessment of purity using SDS-PAGE or HPLC techniques
Functional validation through binding assays or activity measurements
Testing for endotoxin contamination and other impurities
When selecting recombinant rabbit TACR2 for research applications, considering these quality parameters ensures the reliability and reproducibility of experimental results.
The continued development and refinement of recombinant rabbit TACR2 production methods are expected to enhance the availability and quality of these research tools. Emerging applications for recombinant rabbit TACR2 include:
Development of high-throughput screening platforms for identifying novel TACR2 modulators
Integration into microfluidic or organ-on-chip systems for studying tachykinin signaling in complex tissue environments
Utilization in structural biology studies to determine the three-dimensional structure of rabbit TACR2
Application in comparative pharmacology studies to guide the development of species-specific therapeutic approaches
These emerging applications highlight the ongoing importance of recombinant rabbit TACR2 as a valuable research tool in neurobiology, pharmacology, and drug discovery.
The Substance-K receptor, also known as TACR2 or NK2R, is a receptor for the tachykinin neuropeptide substance K (neurokinin A). It belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, specifically within the tachykinin receptor subfamily. TACR2 is associated with G proteins that activate a phosphatidylinositol-calcium second messenger system . The receptor's primary function involves mediating the biological effects of neurokinin A, including smooth muscle contraction, neuronal excitation, and inflammatory responses.
The receptor demonstrates a specific rank order of affinity for tachykinin peptides: substance K (neurokinin A) > neuromedin-K > substance P . This binding specificity determines its physiological role and pharmacological profile.
Rabbit TACR2 exhibits the typical GPCR architecture with seven transmembrane domains (TM1-TM7) connected by alternating intracellular loops (ICL1-3) and extracellular loops (ECL1-3) . The protein begins with an N-terminal extracellular domain and concludes with a C-terminal intracellular domain. The amino acid sequence reveals conserved motifs characteristic of Class A GPCRs, particularly those in the tachykinin receptor family.
Key structural features include:
N-terminal domain consisting of approximately 30 amino acids
Seven hydrophobic transmembrane domains that anchor the receptor in the cell membrane
Three extracellular loops that contribute to ligand binding specificity
Three intracellular loops involved in G protein coupling and signal transduction
C-terminal domain involved in receptor regulation and trafficking
| Domain | Approximate Position | Function |
|---|---|---|
| N-terminus | 1-31 | Extracellular domain involved in initial ligand recognition |
| TM1 | 32-61 | First transmembrane helix |
| ICL1 | 62-67 | First intracellular loop involved in G protein coupling |
| TM2 | 68-91 | Second transmembrane helix |
| ECL1 | 92-107 | First extracellular loop contributing to ligand specificity |
| TM3 | 108-140 | Third transmembrane helix containing critical binding residues |
| ICL2 | 141-150 | Second intracellular loop with G protein interface |
| TM4 | 151-173 | Fourth transmembrane helix |
| ECL2 | 174-191 | Second extracellular loop with disulfide bond |
| TM5 | 192-221 | Fifth transmembrane helix involved in activation |
| ICL3 | 222-244 | Third intracellular loop critical for signaling specificity |
| TM6 | 245-271 | Sixth transmembrane helix with conformational changes upon activation |
| ECL3 | 272-280 | Third extracellular loop |
| TM7 | 281-305 | Seventh transmembrane helix containing NPxxY motif |
When searching literature and databases, researchers should be aware of the various nomenclature used for rabbit TACR2. The following synonyms and identifiers are commonly used :
TACR2 (gene name)
TAC2R (alternative gene name)
NK2R (common abbreviation)
Neurokinin 2 receptor
NK-2 receptor
NK-2R
Neurokinin A receptor
Substance-K receptor
SK receptor
SKR
Substance K receptor
NKNAR
Tachykinin receptor 2
The choice of expression system for rabbit TACR2 significantly impacts protein yield, functionality, and post-translational modifications. Based on research practices with similar GPCRs, the following expression systems offer distinct advantages:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Best Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mammalian cells (HEK293, CHO) | - Native-like post-translational modifications - Proper folding and trafficking - Suitable for functional studies | - Lower yields - Higher cost - Longer production time | Functional assays, binding studies, structural biology with stabilized constructs |
| Insect cells (Sf9, High Five) | - Higher expression levels than mammalian cells - Some post-translational modifications - Cost-effective for scaling | - Differences in glycosylation - May affect certain functional properties | Structural studies, purification for antibody generation, large-scale protein production |
| Yeast (Pichia pastoris) | - High density cultures - Cost-effective - Some post-translational modifications | - Potential hypermannosylation - Different membrane composition | Mutational analysis, purification for structural studies |
| Cell-free systems | - Rapid production - Avoids cellular toxicity - Direct incorporation of modified amino acids | - Lower yields for membrane proteins - Higher cost - May require optimization | Rapid screening, incorporation of unnatural amino acids, mechanistic studies |
For functional studies and accurate pharmacological characterization, mammalian expression systems are generally preferred as they provide the most physiologically relevant environment for TACR2.
When designing constructs for recombinant rabbit TACR2 expression, researchers should address several factors to optimize expression and functionality:
Codon optimization: Adapt the nucleotide sequence to the preferred codon usage of the expression host while avoiding rare codons that might reduce translation efficiency.
Signal peptide selection: The native signal peptide may be replaced with well-characterized alternatives (e.g., hemagglutinin signal peptide) to enhance membrane targeting in heterologous systems.
Affinity tags and fusion partners:
N-terminal tags may interfere with signal peptide cleavage
C-terminal tags are generally preferred for GPCRs but may affect G protein coupling
Common tags include His6, FLAG, and HA
Fusion partners like BRIL, T4 lysozyme, or GFP can enhance expression or stability
Potential modifications to enhance expression:
Removal of predicted proteolytic sites
Introduction of thermostabilizing mutations based on alanine scanning
Deletion or modification of flexible regions that may cause aggregation
Codon optimization for the expression host
Expression vector selection: Consider promoter strength, selection markers, and regulatory elements appropriate for the chosen expression system.
Recombinant rabbit TACR2 provides a controlled system for characterizing the binding properties of novel ligands through various experimental approaches:
| Assay Type | Principle | Advantages | Technical Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radioligand binding | Competition between labeled reference ligand and test compound | - Gold standard for affinity determination - High sensitivity and reproducibility | - Requires radioactive materials - Higher-affinity radioligands preferred - Non-specific binding must be determined - Separation of bound/free ligand needed |
| Fluorescence-based binding | Displacement of fluorescent ligand or direct binding of fluorescent compound | - No radioactivity - Amenable to high-throughput screening - Real-time measurements possible | - Potential interference from intrinsic fluorescence - Background fluorescence - Fluorophore may alter binding properties |
| Surface Plasmon Resonance | Detection of mass changes at sensor surface when ligand binds immobilized receptor | - Label-free detection - Real-time kinetics (kon and koff) - Small sample requirements | - Requires purified receptor protein - Surface immobilization may affect conformation - Regeneration conditions needed for reuse |
| Time-Resolved FRET | Energy transfer between donor on receptor and acceptor on ligand | - High signal-to-noise ratio - Miniaturizable - Homogeneous format (no separation) | - Requires fluorescent labeling - Potential steric hindrance - Distance dependency affects signal |
| Microscale Thermophoresis | Changes in molecular movement in temperature gradients upon binding | - Low sample consumption - Works in complex matrices - Minimal modification of receptor | - Temperature sensitivity - Some compounds may autofluoresce - Requires specialized equipment |
When designing binding experiments with rabbit TACR2, researchers should consider:
Receptor expression level and homogeneity
Membrane preparation quality or cell viability
Buffer composition (pH, ionic strength, reducing agents)
Incubation temperature and equilibration time
Controls for non-specific binding
Data analysis using appropriate mathematical models
Since TACR2 primarily couples to G proteins that activate phosphatidylinositol-calcium signaling pathways , several functional assays can be employed to measure receptor activation:
| Functional Assay | Signaling Pathway Measured | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intracellular calcium mobilization | Gq/11 → PLC → IP3 → Ca2+ release | - Rapid response (seconds) - Real-time kinetics - Automation-friendly - High-throughput capability | - Transient signal - Potential calcium toxicity - Signal amplitude dependent on receptor expression - Can be affected by calcium channel modulators |
| Inositol phosphate accumulation | Gq/11 → PLC → IP3/DAG production | - Cumulative signal measurement - Directly measures second messenger - Not affected by calcium modulators | - Requires radioactive labeling (3H-inositol) - Endpoint assay - More labor-intensive - Longer assay time |
| MAPK phosphorylation | Multiple pathways including G protein and β-arrestin-mediated signaling | - Measures downstream functional effects - Can detect biased signaling - Works with endogenous expression levels | - Pathway affected by multiple inputs - Temporal dynamics critical - Western blot quantification challenging - High variability between cell types |
| GTPγS binding | Direct G protein activation | - Proximal measure of receptor function - Cell-free assay possible with membranes - Directly measures G protein coupling | - Requires radioactive materials - Lower throughput - Technical expertise required - Less sensitive than downstream assays |
| β-arrestin recruitment | Receptor desensitization pathway | - Reveals biased signaling - BRET/FRET-based assays are quantitative - Good dynamic range | - May require fusion constructs - Temporal aspects critical - May not reflect physiological recruitment |
| Receptor internalization | Downregulation response | - Physiologically relevant - Can be monitored by imaging or ELISA | - Slower response (minutes to hours) - Multiple pathways involved - Technical variability |
For comprehensive characterization, combining multiple assays targeting different aspects of signal transduction provides the most complete understanding of receptor pharmacology.
Structure-function studies of rabbit TACR2 require systematic modification of the receptor and evaluation of the functional consequences. Effective approaches include:
Sequence-based targeting:
Align rabbit TACR2 with other species and tachykinin receptor subtypes
Identify conserved motifs and divergent regions
Target highly conserved residues for mutagenesis to identify critical functional elements
Focus on divergent residues to understand subtype or species specificity
Structure-guided approaches:
Generate homology models based on related GPCR crystal structures
Identify residues in predicted binding pockets
Target residues in G protein interaction interfaces
Focus on regions involved in conformational changes during activation
Systematic mutagenesis strategies:
Alanine scanning of transmembrane domains
Conservative substitutions to probe specific chemical interactions
Chimeric receptors swapping domains between related receptors
Domain deletion or insertion to test structural elements
Experimental validation combining:
Ligand binding assays to assess affinity changes
Functional assays to assess signaling alterations
Surface expression measurements to confirm proper folding and trafficking
Conformational studies using intramolecular sensors or accessibility measurements
Species differences in TACR2 pharmacology provide valuable insights for translational research. Rabbit TACR2 serves as an important comparative model due to its distinct pharmacological profile:
Comparative sequence analysis:
Alignment of rabbit TACR2 with human, mouse, and other species reveals key differences
Identification of species-specific amino acids in binding domains
Evolutionary conservation analysis highlights functionally important residues
| Species | Sequence Identity with Rabbit TACR2 | Key Divergent Regions | Pharmacological Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | ~85% | ECL2, TM5 | Differences in antagonist binding |
| Mouse | ~82% | N-terminus, ECL3 | Altered selectivity for certain peptides |
| Rat | ~83% | ICL3, C-terminus | Differences in signaling efficiency |
| Guinea Pig | ~87% | ECL2, TM7 | Closest pharmacological profile to rabbit |
Comparative pharmacology approaches:
Parallel testing of ligand panels across species orthologs
Identification of species-selective compounds
Characterization of differences in signaling bias between species
Chimeric receptor studies:
Swapping domains between rabbit and human TACR2
Identifying regions responsible for species-specific pharmacology
Creating humanized rabbit receptors for translational research
Application to drug discovery:
Prediction of human responses based on multi-species profiling
Understanding evolutionary conservation of binding sites
Identification of species-conserved effects more likely to translate to humans
GPCR dimerization can significantly impact receptor pharmacology and function. For rabbit TACR2, several complementary approaches can assess potential oligomerization:
Biophysical techniques:
Resonance energy transfer methods (BRET/FRET)
Single-molecule imaging and tracking
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP)
Time-resolved FRET with labeled antibodies against epitope tags
Biochemical approaches:
Chemical cross-linking followed by immunoprecipitation
Blue native PAGE to preserve protein complexes
Proximity ligation assays in native tissues
Co-immunoprecipitation with differentially tagged receptors
Functional validation:
Dominant-negative constructs to disrupt function
Trans-complementation between binding-deficient and signaling-deficient mutants
Bivalent ligands targeting dimeric receptors
Allosteric modulation through dimer interfaces
Computational prediction:
Molecular dynamics simulations of receptor interactions
Analysis of potential dimerization interfaces
Energy calculations for stability of dimer formations
When designing these experiments, researchers should consider several critical factors:
Expression levels that avoid artificial aggregation
Controls for non-specific interactions
Methods to distinguish between dimerization and clustering
Validation in multiple systems including native tissues
Contradictory findings in TACR2 signaling research can arise from multiple factors. Recombinant systems offer controlled environments to systematically investigate discrepancies:
Expression level standardization:
Titrated expression using inducible promoters
Quantification of receptor density by radioligand binding
Single-cell analysis to account for heterogeneous expression
Comparison with physiological expression levels
Defined cellular backgrounds:
Use of cells lacking endogenous tachykinin receptors
Knockout of specific signaling components to determine requirements
Reconstitution of signaling pathways in simplified systems
Comparison across multiple cell backgrounds
Temporal resolution of signaling:
Real-time measurements of multiple signaling outputs
Comparison of acute vs. sustained responses
Investigation of desensitization and internalization kinetics
Analysis of signaling adaptation over different time scales
Systematic protocol comparison:
Standardization of buffer conditions, temperature, and other variables
Side-by-side comparison of different assay methodologies
Round-robin testing across different laboratories
Development of standard operating procedures
When addressing contradictions, researchers should develop experimental designs that specifically test competing hypotheses while controlling for variables that might explain discrepancies in previous studies.
Rigorous quality control is critical for ensuring reliable results with recombinant TACR2:
Molecular validation:
Sequence verification of expression constructs
Restriction enzyme digestion patterns
Stability of the construct during cell propagation
Absence of unwanted mutations or recombination events
Expression validation:
Western blotting to confirm expression at expected molecular weight
Flow cytometry to assess surface expression levels
Immunofluorescence microscopy to verify cellular localization
Quantitative PCR to measure transcript levels
Functional validation:
Binding of reference ligands with expected affinity
Dose-response curves with appropriate EC50/IC50 values
Expected signaling in response to known agonists
Appropriate antagonist blockade
Comparison with published parameters for rabbit TACR2
Stability assessment:
Consistent expression over passage number
Reproducible functional responses over time
Storage stability of membrane preparations
Freeze-thaw stability for preserved samples
System-specific validations:
For purified receptor: homogeneity by size exclusion chromatography
For stable cell lines: clonality and expression uniformity
For transient transfections: transfection efficiency and expression window
Several artifacts can confound studies with recombinant TACR2. Researchers should implement specific controls and considerations:
Expression-related artifacts:
Compare multiple expression levels to identify overexpression effects
Use inducible systems to compare different expression conditions
Include wild-type (untransfected) cells as negative controls
Compare with native tissues expressing TACR2 when possible
Tag and fusion protein concerns:
Compare tagged and untagged versions to assess tag interference
Place tags at different positions to determine optimal placement
Use multiple tag types to confirm findings aren't tag-specific
Control for potential dimerization induced by fluorescent protein tags
Cell background influences:
Test multiple cell backgrounds to identify cell-specific effects
Characterize endogenous signaling components in chosen cell lines
Consider knockout or knockdown of potential interfering proteins
Document the complete cellular context of experiments
Technical artifacts:
Include appropriate vehicle controls for all reagents
Control for ligand stability under experimental conditions
Verify compound solubility and avoid precipitation
Test for direct effects of compounds on assay readouts
Include positive controls for assay functionality
Validation approaches:
Confirm key findings with orthogonal assay methodologies
Perform concentration-response curves rather than single concentrations
Include time-course analyses for signaling responses
Use multiple reference compounds to calibrate the system
When faced with conflicting pharmacological data regarding rabbit TACR2, researchers should:
Implement systematic pharmacological analysis:
Full concentration-response curves rather than single-point measurements
Determination of both potency (EC50/IC50) and efficacy parameters
Use of multiple reference compounds for system calibration
Application of the operational model of agonism to determine coupling efficiency
Analysis of competitive vs. non-competitive antagonism
Consider signaling bias:
Parallel measurement of multiple signaling pathways
Calculation of bias factors using appropriate reference ligands
Time-course analysis to capture temporal aspects of signaling
Integration of immediate and downstream responses
Account for experimental variables:
Buffer composition effects (particularly calcium and magnesium concentrations)
Temperature sensitivity of binding and signaling
Receptor reserve effects in different expression systems
Ligand solubility and stability in assay conditions
Statistical rigor:
Appropriate sample size based on power calculations
Blinded experimental design where possible
Technical and biological replicates
Robust statistical methods appropriate for the data structure
Transparent reporting:
Complete methodology description for reproducibility
Sharing of raw data when possible
Acknowledgment of limitations and potential confounds
Consideration of alternative interpretations of the data