Recombinant Rat Taste Receptor Type 2 Member 135, or Tas2r135, is a member of the bitter taste receptor family, which plays a crucial role in detecting bitter compounds. These receptors are part of the Tas2r family, which is responsible for recognizing a wide range of bitter substances. Tas2r135, along with Tas2r143 and Tas2r126, forms a cluster on chromosome 6 in mice and is expressed under common regulatory elements . While specific information on recombinant rat Tas2r135 is limited, research on its mouse counterparts provides valuable insights into its potential functions and characteristics.
Tas2r135 is expressed in various tissues beyond the traditional gustatory system. In mice, it has been found in the heart, vascular smooth muscle cells, thymic epithelial cells, and the epithelium of organs exposed to pathogens, such as the lower airways and gastrointestinal tract . The expression of Tas2r135 in these tissues suggests roles in innate immunity and possibly other physiological processes.
| Tissue/Organ | Expression of Tas2r135 |
|---|---|
| Heart | Yes |
| Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells | Yes |
| Thymic Epithelial Cells | Yes |
| Lower Airways | Yes |
| Gastrointestinal Tract | Yes |
RNA-seq analysis of EGFP-positive cells from the trachea and stomach has shown expression of genes related to innate immunity, suggesting that Tas2r135 may play a role in immune responses .
Understanding the functions of Tas2r135 and other bitter taste receptors can lead to new therapeutic strategies, particularly in areas related to innate immunity and respiratory health. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the roles of Tas2r135 in both gustatory and non-gustatory tissues.
Tas2r135 (also known as Tas2r28, T2R135, or T2R28) is a G-protein coupled receptor that belongs to the bitter taste receptor family. In rodents, the Tas2r135 gene clusters with Tas2r143 and Tas2r126 on chromosome 6, suggesting they share common regulatory elements and possibly evolved through gene duplication events . These receptors exhibit overlapping histone marks and DNase I hypersensitive sites upstream of Tas2r143, indicating they share common cis-regulatory regions that coordinate their expression patterns . The full-length rat Tas2r135 protein consists of 321 amino acids and functions as a transmembrane receptor involved in bitter taste perception and potentially other physiological processes .
Tas2r135 demonstrates a complex expression profile across multiple non-gustatory tissues. Real-time qPCR analysis has detected Tas2r135 expression in murine vascular smooth cells and high-fat-diet induced mouse fat pads . The Tas2r143/Tas2r135/Tas2r126 cluster is notably expressed in rodent hearts and upregulated under starvation conditions . Through transgenic mouse models using BAC-based CreERT2 systems under the control of the Tas2r143 promoter, researchers have been able to monitor expression patterns of this receptor cluster across various tissues . The presence of Tas2r genes along the gastrointestinal tract varies significantly, with different regions expressing distinct subsets of receptors, suggesting specialized functions throughout the digestive system .
The choice of expression system significantly impacts the functional properties of recombinant Tas2r135 protein. E. coli expression systems offer high yield and cost-effectiveness but may lack proper post-translational modifications essential for receptor functionality . For functional studies, mammalian expression systems such as HEK-293 cells are generally preferred as they provide an environment that better supports proper protein folding and modifications necessary for signal transduction .
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Recommended Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, Cost-effective, Simplified purification | Limited post-translational modifications, Potential improper folding, Inclusion body formation | Antibody production, Structural studies, Protein-protein interaction assays |
| HEK-293 Cells | Proper protein folding, Appropriate post-translational modifications, Membrane integration | Lower yield, Higher cost, More complex purification | Functional studies, Ligand binding assays, Signal transduction analysis |
When designing experiments, researchers should consider that functional studies involving bitter taste reception and signal transduction generally require proteins with native-like conformation and appropriate membrane insertion, making mammalian expression systems more suitable despite their higher cost and complexity .
Several methodological approaches can be employed to study Tas2r135 ligand interactions:
Calcium Imaging: This technique leverages the fact that bitter taste receptor activation typically triggers calcium release. By co-expressing Tas2r135 with appropriate G-proteins and calcium-sensitive fluorescent reporters in heterologous systems, researchers can monitor receptor activation in real-time .
BRET/FRET Assays: Bioluminescence/Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer assays allow for the detection of conformational changes in the receptor upon ligand binding, providing insights into receptor activation kinetics.
Electrophysiological Methods: Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings can be used to measure changes in membrane potential or ionic currents following Tas2r135 activation, particularly useful when studying Tas2r135 in native cellular contexts.
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR): This technique enables direct measurement of binding kinetics between purified recombinant Tas2r135 and potential ligands, offering quantitative binding parameters.
For optimal results, a combination of these methods is recommended, as each provides complementary information about receptor-ligand interactions and downstream signaling events .
Several genetic approaches have proven valuable for studying Tas2r135 function in vivo:
CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing: This technique has been successfully employed to delete the entire Tas2r143/Tas2r135/Tas2r126 cluster in mice, creating knockout models that allow researchers to assess the physiological roles of these receptors . Such models have revealed surprising findings, such as the observation that these receptors may not be required for bitter tastant-induced bronchodilation, contrary to previous hypotheses .
BAC-Based Transgenic Models: Bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) transgenic approaches allow for the expression of reporter genes (such as CreERT2) under the control of the Tas2r143 promoter. When crossed with appropriate reporter lines (e.g., Rosa26-EGFP), these models enable visualization of Tas2r expression patterns across multiple tissues .
Conditional Knockout Strategies: Tissue-specific deletion of Tas2r135 using Cre-loxP systems provides more refined insights into receptor function in specific cell types or organs, minimizing developmental compensations that might occur in global knockout models.
Knock-in Reporter Systems: Direct insertion of fluorescent reporters into the Tas2r135 locus enables visualization of endogenous expression patterns while maintaining regulatory elements, offering advantages over transgenic approaches that might not capture all regulatory nuances .
The choice of genetic approach should be guided by specific research questions, with considerations for temporal and spatial control of gene expression or deletion .
When investigating Tas2r135 function in extraoral tissues, researchers should consider the following experimental design principles:
Validation of Expression: Before functional studies, confirm Tas2r135 expression in the tissue of interest using multiple complementary methods such as qRT-PCR, immunohistochemistry, and reporter mouse models . The use of multiple detection methods helps overcome potential antibody specificity issues common with GPCR research.
Cell-Type Specificity: Determine which specific cell types within the tissue express Tas2r135. Single-cell RNA sequencing or fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of reporter-expressing cells can provide this resolution .
Physiological Readouts: Select appropriate physiological endpoints relevant to the tissue being studied. For example:
Pharmacological Approaches: Include both gain-of-function (agonist) and loss-of-function (antagonist) studies, alongside genetic approaches (knockout models) to comprehensively assess receptor function .
Controls for Receptor Specificity: Given the sequence similarity among Tas2r family members, include specificity controls to ensure observed effects are attributable to Tas2r135 rather than related receptors. This might involve comparing responses in wild-type versus Tas2r135-specific knockout models .
A well-designed study would incorporate tissue-specific, cell-type-specific, and receptor-specific controls to rigorously establish Tas2r135 function in the extraoral tissue of interest .
Successful reconstitution of recombinant Tas2r135 protein requires careful attention to several critical factors:
Buffer Composition: Optimal reconstitution typically requires Tris/PBS-based buffers (pH 8.0) with stabilizing agents such as trehalose (approximately 6%) . These components help maintain protein stability during the reconstitution process.
Reconstitution Procedure:
Storage Conditions:
Verification of Integrity: Following reconstitution, verify protein integrity through SDS-PAGE and functional assays before proceeding with experiments. Purity of >90% is generally recommended for functional studies .
Membrane Incorporation (for functional studies): For studies requiring functional receptor, consider incorporating the recombinant protein into appropriate lipid environments (liposomes or nanodiscs) that mimic the native membrane environment of GPCRs .
Adherence to these guidelines maximizes the likelihood of maintaining receptor functionality for subsequent experimental applications.
Researchers frequently encounter technical challenges when analyzing Tas2r135 expression. Here are strategies to address common issues:
Low Expression Levels: Tas2r135 often exhibits low expression levels in non-gustatory tissues, making detection challenging. To overcome this:
Antibody Specificity Issues: Commercial antibodies against Tas2r family members often show cross-reactivity. Mitigating strategies include:
Heterogeneous Tissue Expression: As shown with Tas2r131, expression of bitter taste receptors may be restricted to specific cell types within a tissue (e.g., mucin-producing goblet cells, Paneth cells) . This heterogeneity may mask detection in whole-tissue analyses. Solutions include:
Dynamic Regulation: Expression levels may fluctuate with physiological state (e.g., upregulation under starvation) . Design time-course experiments and control for physiological variables that might affect expression.
By anticipating these challenges and implementing appropriate methodological approaches, researchers can more effectively characterize Tas2r135 expression patterns across tissues .
When interpreting data from Tas2r knockout models versus pharmacological studies, researchers should consider several important factors that may lead to apparent discrepancies:
A comprehensive approach that integrates both genetic and pharmacological methodologies, alongside careful controls for specificity, provides the most robust framework for data interpretation .
Several contradictions exist in the current literature regarding Tas2r135 function, particularly in extraoral tissues:
Bronchodilation Mechanism Controversy: While bitter tastants consistently induce bronchodilation, the triple knockout of Tas2r143/Tas2r135/Tas2r126 did not affect this response, suggesting these receptors may not mediate this effect as previously hypothesized . This contradiction might be resolved through:
Comprehensive expression profiling of all Tas2r family members in airway tissues
Investigation of alternative receptors or direct ion channel effects of bitter compounds
Development of more specific pharmacological tools with confirmed receptor selectivity
Metabolic Function Discrepancies: Some studies suggest bitter taste receptors like Tas2r135 regulate glucose metabolism through GLP-1 release, while other data indicate minimal effects on metabolic parameters . Potential resolution approaches include:
Cell-type specific knockout studies focusing on enteroendocrine cells
Direct measurement of hormone release in primary cultures from wild-type versus knockout animals
Translational studies comparing findings across species (rodent to human)
Expression Pattern Inconsistencies: Different studies report varying expression patterns of Tas2r135 across tissues . To resolve these discrepancies:
Standardize detection methodologies and threshold criteria
Account for dynamic regulation under different physiological states
Use multiple complementary detection methods (qPCR, in situ hybridization, reporter models)
Addressing these contradictions requires methodological refinement, increased specificity in both genetic and pharmacological approaches, and careful consideration of the complex regulatory mechanisms governing Tas2r135 expression and function across diverse tissues .
Differentiating direct Tas2r135-mediated effects from indirect physiological responses is crucial for accurately characterizing receptor function. Researchers should implement the following strategies:
Temporal Analysis: Direct receptor-mediated effects typically occur rapidly (seconds to minutes) following ligand exposure, while indirect effects may take longer to manifest. Time-course experiments with high temporal resolution can help distinguish these responses .
Cell-Autonomous Validation: Isolated cell systems expressing Tas2r135 can determine whether observed effects require the cellular context or occur in isolated cells. Approaches include:
Signaling Pathway Dissection: Tas2r135, as a GPCR, couples to specific G-proteins and downstream signaling pathways. Pharmacological or genetic inhibition of these pathways can determine whether effects are mediated through canonical receptor signaling:
Ex Vivo and In Vitro Correlation: Compare responses in intact tissues (ex vivo) with those in isolated cell systems (in vitro) expressing Tas2r135. Concordance between these systems suggests direct receptor-mediated effects .
Receptor Specificity Controls: Use cells or tissues from Tas2r135 knockout models as negative controls when applying putative receptor ligands. Persistence of effects in knockout tissues strongly suggests indirect or receptor-independent mechanisms .
By systematically applying these approaches, researchers can more confidently attribute observed physiological responses to direct Tas2r135 activation versus indirect or non-specific effects .
Several emerging research areas are expanding our understanding of Tas2r135 function beyond traditional taste perception:
Immunomodulatory Roles: Based on expression patterns in tissues with immune functions, Tas2r135 may participate in immune response regulation. Future research should examine:
Metabolic Regulation: Given the expression of Tas2r family members in enteroendocrine cells and evidence linking bitter taste receptors to glucose homeostasis, future work should address:
Tissue-Specific Signaling: The same receptor may couple to different downstream pathways depending on the cellular context. Research should investigate:
Therapeutic Targeting: The expression of Tas2r135 in multiple extraoral tissues suggests potential for therapeutic targeting. Future directions include:
These emerging areas represent fertile ground for expanding our understanding of this receptor's physiological significance beyond its canonical role in bitter taste perception .
Several innovative methodological approaches hold promise for advancing Tas2r135 research:
CRISPR-Based Techniques Beyond Gene Deletion:
Advanced Imaging Approaches:
Proteomics and Interactomics:
Computational and Structural Biology:
Organoid and Microphysiological Systems:
These advanced approaches, particularly when used in combination, can provide unprecedented insights into Tas2r135 biology across multiple physiological contexts .