Recombinant Rat Transmembrane Protein 183, also known as Tmem183, is a protein that has been expressed in a recombinant form, typically in bacteria like Escherichia coli (E. coli). This protein is of interest due to its potential roles in cellular processes, although specific functions may vary depending on the context of its expression and study. The recombinant form allows researchers to study its structure, function, and interactions in a controlled environment.
The recombinant full-length mouse Tmem183 protein, which is closely related to rat Tmem183, is expressed with an N-terminal His tag for easy purification and detection. It consists of 375 amino acids and is available in a lyophilized powder form. The protein's purity is greater than 90% as determined by SDS-PAGE, indicating a high level of purification suitable for various biochemical assays .
Recombinant proteins like Tmem183 are typically expressed in bacterial systems due to their efficiency and cost-effectiveness. The use of His tags allows for affinity purification using nickel or cobalt columns, which can achieve high purity levels necessary for structural and functional studies.
Transmembrane protein 183 (Tmem183), also known as Tmem183a or MNCb-2755, is a 375 amino acid membrane protein that belongs to the TMEM183 family . The protein contains multiple transmembrane domains that anchor it within cellular membranes. While detailed structural analyses are still emerging, the protein likely adopts a conformation similar to other transmembrane proteins, with both extracellular and intracellular domains that facilitate its biological functions. The gene encoding TMEM183 is located on chromosome 1 in mice, which houses over 1,500 genes including those encoding nuclear receptor coactivators, coatomer complex subunits, synaptotagmins, and olfactory receptors .
Sequence analysis of Tmem183 reveals conserved domains that suggest potential functional roles in cellular signaling or transport processes. Unlike other well-characterized transmembrane proteins such as Tmem43, which has been extensively studied (with a known sequence of 400 amino acids for the rat variant) , Tmem183 represents an emerging area of investigation requiring further characterization.
TMEM183 expression patterns demonstrate tissue specificity, though comprehensive expression profiling across rat tissues remains incomplete. By analogy to other transmembrane proteins in the same family, Tmem183 likely exhibits differential expression across various tissue types. For example, TMEM182, another member of the transmembrane protein family, shows notable abundance in muscle and adipose tissue .
When designing experiments to analyze Tmem183 expression, researchers should consider:
Using quantitative RT-PCR to measure transcript levels across different tissues
Implementing Western blot analysis with validated antibodies for protein expression assessment
Employing immunohistochemistry for spatial localization within tissue sections
Comparing expression levels during different developmental stages
A systematic analysis of expression patterns would provide valuable insights into potential tissue-specific functions of Tmem183 in rats.
Multiple orthogonal approaches should be employed to validate recombinant Tmem183 protein identity:
| Validation Method | Technical Approach | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| SDS-PAGE | Protein separation under denaturing conditions | Single band at expected molecular weight (~41 kDa for rat Tmem183) |
| Western Blot | Immunodetection with anti-Tmem183 antibodies | Specific binding at expected molecular weight |
| Mass Spectrometry | Peptide mass fingerprinting | Identification of signature peptides matching Tmem183 sequence |
| N-terminal Sequencing | Edman degradation | Confirmation of predicted N-terminal sequence |
| Functional Assays | Activity tests based on predicted function | Function consistent with native protein |
Mass spectrometric characterization is particularly valuable for definitive identification, as demonstrated with other recombinant rat transmembrane proteins . This approach can provide detailed information about post-translational modifications and confirm the amino acid sequence, enabling researchers to verify the integrity of the recombinant protein before proceeding with functional studies.
The selection of an appropriate expression system is critical for obtaining functional recombinant Tmem183. Based on experimental approaches used for similar transmembrane proteins:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Optimization Strategies |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, cost-effective, rapid expression | Limited post-translational modifications, potential inclusion body formation | Use of specialized strains (e.g., Rosetta, Origami), fusion tags (SUMO, MBP), lower induction temperature |
| Mammalian cells (CHO, HEK293) | Native-like post-translational modifications, proper folding | Lower yield, higher cost, longer production time | Stable cell line development, optimized media formulations, inducible expression systems |
| Insect cells (Sf9, High Five) | Intermediate yield, eukaryotic processing | Glycosylation patterns differ from mammals | Optimize MOI, harvest time, and culture conditions |
| Cell-free systems | Avoids toxicity issues, rapid | Lower yield, higher cost | Supplement with lipids/detergents for membrane proteins |
While specific information about Tmem183 signaling is limited, insights can be gained from other transmembrane proteins in the same family. By analyzing structural homology and conserved domains, several potential signaling pathways may be implicated:
Wnt/β-catenin Signaling: Similar transmembrane proteins like TMEM182 interact with integrin-linked kinase (ILK), which increases Ser473 phosphorylation of AKT, promoting GSK-3β phosphorylation at Ser9 . This inhibits β-catenin degradation, enhancing its nuclear accumulation and transcriptional activity.
Cell Adhesion and Cytoskeletal Organization: Based on the involvement of chromosome 1-localized genes in processes related to cell structure and interaction .
Membrane Transport: As a transmembrane protein, Tmem183 may participate in ion or small molecule transport across cellular membranes.
Experimental approaches to investigate these pathways include:
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify protein interaction partners
Phosphorylation analysis of downstream signaling molecules (western blotting)
Reporter assays for transcriptional activation
Cellular localization studies using fluorescently tagged Tmem183
Understanding these pathways is crucial for elucidating Tmem183's biological function and potential role in disease processes.
Investigating protein-protein interactions for transmembrane proteins requires specialized techniques:
| Technique | Principle | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-immunoprecipitation | Pull-down of protein complexes using antibodies | Identifies native interactions | Requires specific antibodies, may disrupt weak interactions |
| Proximity Ligation Assay | Detection of proteins in close proximity (<40 nm) | In situ visualization, high sensitivity | Limited to fixed samples |
| FRET/BRET | Energy transfer between fluorophores/bioluminescent proteins | Real-time detection in living cells | Requires protein tagging, potential interference |
| Split protein complementation | Reconstitution of reporter protein activity when interaction occurs | Good for membrane proteins | Potential false positives/negatives |
| Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry | Chemical cross-linking followed by MS identification | Captures transient interactions | Complex data analysis, optimization required |
| Yeast Two-Hybrid (membrane-based) | Transcriptional activation upon interaction | High-throughput screening | High false positive rate |
For transmembrane proteins like Tmem183, membrane-based assays such as membrane yeast two-hybrid or split-ubiquitin systems are particularly valuable as they are designed specifically for membrane proteins that may not properly localize to the nucleus in conventional yeast two-hybrid systems.
When designing these experiments, researchers should:
Consider the topology of Tmem183 to ensure interaction domains are accessible
Use appropriate controls to validate interactions
Confirm interactions using multiple independent techniques
Validate biological relevance through functional assays
Understanding phenotypic changes associated with Tmem183 dysregulation provides insights into its functional significance. While specific data on Tmem183 phenotypes is limited, potential areas of investigation based on transmembrane protein biology include:
Cellular Morphology: Changes in cell shape, size, or membrane architecture
Cell Viability and Proliferation: Effects on growth rate, cell cycle progression, or apoptosis
Differentiation Capacity: Impact on lineage commitment or differentiation potential
Cellular Localization: Altered distribution of cellular components or organelles
Tissue Integrity: Changes in tissue architecture or function in animal models
For example, studies of similar proteins like TMEM182 have shown that its overexpression inhibits myocardial differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by maintaining Wnt/β-catenin signaling in an activated state . This suggests that transmembrane proteins can significantly impact cellular differentiation processes.
Experimental approaches should include:
Loss-of-function (knockdown/knockout) studies
Gain-of-function (overexpression) studies
Rescue experiments to confirm specificity of observed phenotypes
Tissue-specific manipulations in animal models
Detailed phenotypic characterization using multiple parameters will provide a comprehensive understanding of Tmem183's biological roles.
Developing specific antibodies against transmembrane proteins presents unique challenges:
Epitope Selection:
Analyze the Tmem183 sequence to identify hydrophilic, surface-exposed regions
Focus on N- or C-terminal regions that typically extend into aqueous environments
Avoid transmembrane domains that are poorly immunogenic
Consider species conservation if cross-reactivity is desired
Antigen Preparation Options:
Synthetic peptides corresponding to selected epitopes
Recombinant protein fragments expressed in E. coli
Full-length protein in detergent micelles or nanodiscs
DNA immunization encoding Tmem183 fragments
Validation Strategy:
Western blot analysis with positive and negative controls
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Immunofluorescence with subcellular localization analysis
Testing on tissues from Tmem183 knockout models
Peptide competition assays
Potential Pitfalls:
Conformational epitopes may be lost in denatured proteins
Cross-reactivity with homologous proteins
Low expression levels limiting detection
Detergent sensitivity affecting epitope recognition
An effective validation process is critical before using antibodies in research applications, as demonstrated in studies of other transmembrane proteins where antibody specificity enables detailed characterization of protein expression and localization .
Computational methods offer valuable insights into transmembrane protein structure and function:
Structural Prediction:
Transmembrane helix prediction using algorithms like TMHMM, PHDhtm, or MEMSAT
Ab initio modeling with specialized tools for membrane proteins (e.g., Rosetta Membrane)
Homology modeling based on structurally characterized transmembrane proteins
Molecular dynamics simulations to predict stability and conformational changes
Functional Prediction:
Motif identification using tools like PROSITE or ELM
Gene ontology annotation based on sequence similarity
Protein-protein interaction prediction using tools like STRING
Virtual screening for potential ligands or binding partners
Evolutionary Analysis:
Multiple sequence alignment to identify conserved residues
Phylogenetic analysis to understand evolutionary relationships
Positive selection analysis to identify functionally important residues
Integrative Approaches:
Combined structure-function prediction using machine learning
Network analysis to place Tmem183 in biological pathways
Systems biology modeling of potential regulatory networks
These computational approaches provide testable hypotheses that can guide experimental design and interpretation of results.
While specific information about Tmem183 in disease models is limited, transmembrane proteins on chromosome 1 have been implicated in various conditions:
Neurological Disorders: Chromosome 1-localized genes have been associated with conditions such as infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy in mouse models . Investigating Tmem183's expression in neuronal tissues and its potential role in neurological function could reveal involvement in related disorders.
Autoimmune Conditions: Given that chromosome 1 genes have been linked to autoimmune myocarditis , Tmem183 may play a role in immune regulation or inflammation.
Cancer: Chromosome 1 genes have been implicated in lung carcinomas . Research examining Tmem183 expression changes in tumor versus normal tissues could identify potential oncogenic or tumor-suppressive roles.
Cardiovascular System: By analogy to TMEM182, which affects myocardial differentiation through Wnt/β-catenin signaling , Tmem183 may have roles in cardiovascular development or function.
Research approaches to investigate disease relevance include:
Expression analysis in tissues from disease models
Genetic association studies in rat models of human disease
Functional studies in relevant cell types
Therapeutic modulation of Tmem183 expression or function
Recombinant Tmem183 provides a valuable tool for developing screening assays:
Binding Assays:
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to detect direct interactions
Fluorescence-based thermal shift assays to identify stabilizing compounds
AlphaScreen or FRET-based assays for high-throughput screening
Functional Assays:
Activity-based assays if enzymatic function is identified
Cell-based reporter systems measuring downstream pathway activation
Phenotypic screens in Tmem183-expressing cell lines
Structural Studies for Rational Design:
X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM of purified Tmem183
Fragment-based screening approaches
Computer-aided drug design based on structural models
Assay Development Considerations:
Protein stability in screening conditions
Signal-to-background optimization
Assay miniaturization for high-throughput formats
Inclusion of appropriate positive and negative controls
When establishing these assays, researchers should ensure that recombinant Tmem183 maintains native conformation and activity, possibly by incorporating it into appropriate membrane mimetics such as nanodiscs or liposomes.
Maintaining transmembrane protein solubility and stability requires specialized approaches:
Detergent Screening:
Test multiple detergent classes (maltoside, glucoside, fos-choline)
Evaluate detergent concentration effects
Consider detergent mixtures for improved stability
Buffer Optimization:
Adjust pH to optimize protein stability
Test different salt concentrations (typically 150-300 mM)
Include stabilizing agents (glycerol, trehalose, specific lipids)
Additives for Enhanced Stability:
Cholesterol or other sterols for membrane protein stability
Specific lipids that may be required for function
Small molecule stabilizers identified through thermal shift assays
Alternative Solubilization Approaches:
Amphipols for improved stability after initial detergent solubilization
Nanodiscs for a more native-like membrane environment
Styrene maleic acid lipid particles (SMALPs) for detergent-free extraction
Purification Modifications:
Reduce temperature during all purification steps
Minimize exposure time during chromatography
Include fresh protease inhibitors throughout the process
Systematic optimization of these parameters will significantly improve purification outcomes for challenging transmembrane proteins like Tmem183.