Adapted from PMC and STRING interaction data .
This recombinant protein serves as a critical tool for studying microprotein biology and calcium homeostasis. Key applications include:
Applications derived from Genemedi and STRING .
Bioinformatics and interaction mapping reveal associations with calcium-regulatory proteins:
Interaction data from STRING .
While the recombinant protein enables structural and interaction studies, challenges persist:
Functional Elucidation: Direct experimental validation of calcium-modulatory roles is needed.
Species-Specific Variations: Human ALN’s transmembrane domain (aa 177–199) is truncated in the rat homolog (aa 1–65) , necessitating comparative studies.
Thermal Stability: Repeated freeze-thaw cycles compromise activity, requiring optimized storage protocols .
KEGG: rno:691807
UniGene: Rn.42365
Rat Uncharacterized protein C4orf3 homolog is a small protein (65 amino acids) with UniProt ID Q498U0. It is the rat ortholog of the human C4orf3 protein (chromosome 4 open reading frame 3), whose function remains largely unknown. The protein is typically expressed in E. coli systems for research purposes, often with an N-terminal His tag to facilitate purification and detection. The designation "uncharacterized" indicates that its biological function has not yet been fully elucidated, making it a potential target for functional genomics studies .
For optimal stability, Recombinant Rat Uncharacterized protein C4orf3 homolog should be stored at -20°C or -80°C upon receipt. The protein is typically provided as a lyophilized powder and requires proper handling to maintain its integrity. Key storage recommendations include:
Store the lyophilized protein at -20°C/-80°C
After reconstitution, prepare working aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week
For long-term storage, add glycerol (5-50% final concentration, with 50% being the standard recommendation)
The storage buffer typically consists of Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% Trehalose at pH 8.0, or Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol
Repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided as they can compromise protein stability and biological activity. Proper aliquoting upon initial reconstitution is therefore essential for maintaining protein quality throughout a research project.
The reconstitution process is critical for maintaining protein activity. Follow these methodological steps:
Briefly centrifuge the vial prior to opening to bring contents to the bottom
Reconstitute the lyophilized protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
For long-term storage, add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (50% is standard)
Gently mix until completely dissolved
Prepare small working aliquots to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Store reconstituted protein according to the temperature requirements (-20°C/-80°C for long-term storage, 4°C for short-term use)
This methodical approach ensures maximum retention of protein stability and activity for downstream applications such as binding studies, functional assays, or structural analyses.
Validation of protein identity and purity is essential before proceeding with experiments. Recommended validation methods include:
SDS-PAGE analysis to confirm molecular weight (approximately 7.1 kDa for the core protein, with additional weight from the His-tag)
Western blotting using anti-His antibodies or specific antibodies against the protein
Mass spectrometry for precise molecular weight determination and sequence verification
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to assess secondary structure elements
Size exclusion chromatography to evaluate protein homogeneity
According to manufacturer specifications, the protein purity should be greater than 90% as determined by SDS-PAGE . When designing validation experiments, researchers should consider both tag-based detection methods and techniques that verify the protein's primary sequence.
Since C4orf3 homolog is uncharacterized, bioinformatic analyses represent crucial first steps in functional prediction. A comprehensive approach would include:
Sequence homology analysis using BLAST against characterized proteins
Domain prediction using tools such as PFAM, SMART, or InterPro
Secondary structure prediction using PSIPRED or JPred
Tertiary structure modeling using AlphaFold2 or I-TASSER
Subcellular localization prediction with tools like TargetP, PSORT, or DeepLoc
Analysis of conserved motifs across species to identify potential functional regions
Gene ontology (GO) term inference based on structural features
Protein-protein interaction prediction using tools like STRING
The amino acid sequence (MEVGQAASGTDGVRERRGSSAARRRSQDEPVQSGMNGIPKHSYWLDLWLFILFDLALFIFVYLLP) suggests the presence of a hydrophobic C-terminal region that might indicate membrane association, which could guide experimental designs to investigate its cellular localization and function .
To identify potential interaction partners of Rat Uncharacterized protein C4orf3 homolog, consider these methodological approaches:
Affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (AP-MS):
Utilize the His-tag for pulldown experiments from rat tissue or cell lysates
Analyze co-precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry
Validate interactions with reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation
Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening:
Generate bait constructs using the full-length protein or domains
Screen against rat cDNA libraries
Validate positive interactions using alternative methods
Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID) or APEX2:
Express the protein fused to BioID2 or APEX2 in relevant cell types
Identify neighboring proteins through biotinylation and streptavidin pulldown
Cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS):
Use chemical cross-linkers to capture transient interactions
Identify crosslinked peptides through specialized MS protocols
The His-tag present in the recombinant protein provides a convenient handle for many of these interaction studies, particularly for affinity purification approaches . When designing these experiments, researchers should consider both cytosolic and membrane-associated protein extraction protocols, given the potential membrane association indicated by the protein sequence.
Based on the amino acid sequence, several structural characteristics can be predicted:
Feature | Prediction | Basis | Experimental Implication |
---|---|---|---|
Transmembrane domains | Likely 1 C-terminal TM domain | Hydrophobic C-terminal region (WLFILFDLALFIFVYLLP) | May affect solubility and require detergents for extraction |
Secondary structure | Mixed α-helix and β-strand elements | Amino acid composition and distribution | Consider buffer conditions that stabilize these elements |
Isoelectric point (pI) | Approximately 10.1 | High proportion of basic residues (R, K) | Consider pH effects on protein behavior in assays |
Post-translational modifications | Potential phosphorylation sites at serine residues | Multiple S residues in N-terminal region | Phospho-specific antibodies may be valuable for function studies |
Protein stability | Moderate stability predicted | Amino acid composition analysis | Optimize buffer conditions accordingly |
These structural predictions can guide experimental design, particularly for structural biology approaches such as X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, or cryo-electron microscopy . The potential membrane association suggested by the hydrophobic C-terminus would necessitate special considerations for structural studies, including the potential use of detergents or lipid nanodiscs.
The sequence characteristics of Rat Uncharacterized protein C4orf3 homolog suggest potential challenges in handling:
Solubility issues: The hydrophobic C-terminal region (WLFILFDLALFIFVYLLP) indicates potential membrane association, which might lead to solubility problems in aqueous buffers. To address this:
Consider including mild detergents (0.1% Triton X-100, 0.5% CHAPS) in working buffers
Test different buffer compositions with varying salt concentrations (150-500 mM NaCl)
Evaluate protein behavior at different pH values (pH 6.5-8.5)
Stability concerns: Small proteins can be prone to degradation. Strategies to enhance stability include:
Methodologically, researchers should perform pilot experiments to determine optimal conditions for their specific application, monitoring protein stability through SDS-PAGE analysis at different time points under various storage conditions.
When working with recombinant C4orf3 homolog, researchers might encounter several expression and purification challenges:
Expression optimization:
Test multiple expression systems (bacterial, insect, mammalian) if native folding is a concern
Evaluate different induction conditions (temperature, inducer concentration, duration)
Consider codon optimization for the expression host
Test fusion partners that might enhance solubility (MBP, SUMO, GST)
Purification strategies:
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using the His-tag
Size exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates
Ion exchange chromatography as a polishing step
Consider on-column refolding if the protein forms inclusion bodies
Quality control:
For researchers ordering commercial recombinant protein, quality assessment upon receipt is still recommended to confirm that specifications match the manufacturer's claims.
Determining the cellular localization of Rat Uncharacterized protein C4orf3 homolog is a crucial step in functional characterization. Recommended methodological approaches include:
Immunofluorescence microscopy:
Generate specific antibodies against the protein or use anti-His antibodies
Perform co-localization studies with organelle-specific markers
Analyze fixed cells from relevant rat tissues or cell lines
Subcellular fractionation:
Isolate different cellular compartments (cytosol, membrane, nucleus, etc.)
Detect protein distribution by western blotting
Compare observed distribution with bioinformatic predictions
Fluorescent protein fusion approaches:
Generate C- and N-terminal GFP (or variants) fusion constructs
Express in relevant cell types and observe live cell localization
Compare with predicted localization based on sequence analysis
Proximity labeling methods:
Create fusion proteins with BioID or APEX2
Identify neighboring proteins through biotinylation
Infer localization based on known localization of interaction partners
The hydrophobic C-terminal region in the protein sequence suggests possible membrane association, which should be specifically investigated using membrane protein extraction protocols and membrane-specific markers .
To determine the physiological function of Rat Uncharacterized protein C4orf3 homolog, a systematic approach is recommended:
Loss-of-function studies:
Design siRNA or CRISPR-Cas9 strategies targeting the gene
Evaluate phenotypic changes in relevant cell types or animal models
Perform transcriptomic and proteomic analyses to identify affected pathways
Gain-of-function studies:
Overexpress the protein in relevant cell types
Assess changes in cellular phenotypes (morphology, growth, differentiation)
Investigate effects on specific signaling pathways based on bioinformatic predictions
Expression pattern analysis:
Examine tissue-specific expression patterns by qRT-PCR or western blotting
Correlate expression with specific physiological states or developmental stages
Compare with expression patterns of known functional homologs in other species
Evolutionary conservation analysis:
Compare sequence conservation across species
Identify highly conserved residues that might be functionally important
Design point mutations to test the functional significance of conserved residues
Starting with comprehensive bioinformatic analyses to generate hypotheses about potential functions based on sequence features, domain predictions, and evolutionary conservation would provide direction for targeted experimental approaches.
Determining the three-dimensional structure of Rat Uncharacterized protein C4orf3 homolog could provide valuable insights into its function. Recommended structural biology approaches include:
X-ray crystallography:
Optimize protein expression and purification for high purity and homogeneity
Screen crystallization conditions systematically
Consider tag removal for crystallization attempts
If membrane-associated, use lipidic cubic phase crystallization
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy:
Particularly suitable for small proteins (<20 kDa)
Requires 15N/13C-labeled protein production
Can provide dynamics information in addition to structure
May provide insights into potential ligand binding sites
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM):
More suitable if the protein forms larger complexes
May require fusion to a larger protein scaffold for single-particle analysis
Consider using Fab fragments to increase particle size
Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS):
Provides low-resolution structural information in solution
Can confirm folding and oligomeric state
Useful for studying conformational changes
Each approach has advantages and limitations, and the choice depends on specific research questions and available resources. Given the small size of this protein (65 amino acids), NMR spectroscopy might be particularly well-suited for structural characterization .
A comprehensive multi-omics strategy can accelerate functional characterization of Rat Uncharacterized protein C4orf3 homolog:
Transcriptomics integration:
Analyze co-expression networks to identify genes with similar expression patterns
Perform differential expression analysis following protein knockdown/overexpression
Identify transcription factors that might regulate the gene
Proteomics approaches:
Conduct interaction proteomics using affinity purification-mass spectrometry
Analyze post-translational modifications
Perform global proteome analysis after gene modulation
Metabolomics integration:
Investigate metabolic changes associated with protein modulation
Identify potential metabolic pathways affected
Integrated data analysis framework:
Apply machine learning approaches to integrate multi-omics data
Use pathway enrichment analysis across datasets
Develop predictive models for protein function based on integrated data
Omics Level | Method | Expected Outcome | Integration Approach |
---|---|---|---|
Genomics | Variant analysis | Association with phenotypes | Correlation with expression |
Transcriptomics | RNA-seq after knockdown | Co-regulated genes | Network analysis |
Proteomics | AP-MS | Interaction partners | Functional clustering |
Metabolomics | Untargeted LC-MS | Affected metabolites | Pathway mapping |
Phenomics | Cellular phenotyping | Functional effects | Multi-parameter correlation |
This integrated approach can provide a systems-level understanding of protein function and place it within the broader context of cellular physiology.