Recombinant Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii Ferrochelatase (hemH)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will preferentially ship the format we have in stock. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering, and we will fulfill your request.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary based on purchasing method and location. Consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. For dry ice shipping, please contact us in advance; additional fees apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to collect contents at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C is recommended. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50% for your reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors: storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Generally, the liquid form has a shelf life of 6 months at -20°C/-80°C, while the lyophilized form has a shelf life of 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receiving. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during the manufacturing process. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing it.
Synonyms
hemH; Rleg2_3304; Ferrochelatase; EC 4.99.1.1; Heme synthase; Protoheme ferro-lyase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-344
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii (strain WSM2304)
Target Names
hemH
Target Protein Sequence
MTADTSLRPA DHPAVKSGKV GVLLVNLGTP DGTDYTSMRR YLREFLTDRR VIEWSPWKWY PILFGVVLNT RPRKVGKAYE LIWNKEKNES YLRTYTRNQS ELMAEHLKDL ATVKVDWAMR YGTPSIASRI EALKQEGCDR IVLFPLYPQY AAATTATVND KAFQKLLSMR WQPALRTVPD YHDDETYIEA LATSVEKHLA TLDWKPEMLL ASFHGIPMSY FKQGDPYYCQ CQKTGRLLRE RLGLTKENFM VTFQSRFGPE EWLQPYTDKT VEKLAQDGVK RIAVINPGFV SDCLETLEEI AEQAAHSFHE NGGEKFAHIP CLNDGEDGMT VLEKVVRREL QGWI
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Catalyzes the insertion of ferrous iron into protoporphyrin IX.
Database Links
Protein Families
Ferrochelatase family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii and why is it significant for research?

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii is a soil bacterium that establishes nitrogen-fixing symbiotic relationships with clover plants (Trifolium spp.). This bacterium forms specialized structures called nodules on clover roots, where it converts atmospheric dinitrogen to ammonia, a compound that can be utilized by the plant . The symbiotic relationship plays an essential role in many ecosystems, contributing significantly to global nitrogen fixation, with annual yields comparable to artificial nitrogen fertilizers .

R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii serves as an important model organism for studying plant-microbe interactions, bacterial genetics, and symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Its agricultural importance and relatively manageable genome make it valuable for both fundamental research and applications in sustainable agriculture.

What is ferrochelatase (hemH) and what role does it play in R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii biology?

Ferrochelatase, encoded by the hemH gene, is the terminal enzyme in the heme biosynthesis pathway. It catalyzes the insertion of ferrous iron (Fe²⁺) into protoporphyrin IX to form protoheme (heme b). In R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii, this enzyme is critical for producing heme-containing proteins, including cytochromes, catalases, and peroxidases that function in respiration, energy generation, and oxidative stress management.

These heme-containing proteins are particularly important during symbiosis when bacteria transition to the bacteroid state within nodules, where they require specialized respiratory systems to function in the microaerobic environment. The proper functioning of ferrochelatase is therefore essential for successful symbiotic interactions and nitrogen fixation capabilities.

How does the hemH gene product contribute to successful symbiotic interactions?

The hemH gene product (ferrochelatase) contributes to successful symbiotic interactions through several mechanisms:

  • Enables production of cytochromes necessary for respiration in the microaerobic nodule environment

  • Supports synthesis of heme-containing enzymes that manage oxidative stress encountered during infection and bacteroid differentiation

  • Contributes to energy metabolism during symbiosis through heme-containing proteins in electron transport chains

  • May influence cell envelope properties that affect bacterial attachment and infection thread formation

A properly functioning heme biosynthesis pathway is crucial for bacteroid differentiation and survival within the plant-derived symbiosome. Disruptions in the hemH gene would likely impair cytochrome production, leading to defects in respiration and energy metabolism that would ultimately compromise nitrogen fixation efficiency.

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase?

The choice of expression system for recombinant R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase depends on research goals and downstream applications. The following systems offer different advantages:

E. coli expression systems:

  • pET vector systems with T7 promoter provide high yields but may form inclusion bodies

  • pBAD vectors with arabinose-inducible promoters allow more controlled expression

  • Fusion tag strategies (His-tag, MBP, GST) can improve solubility and facilitate purification

Homologous expression:

  • Expression in R. leguminosarum using broad host range vectors provides a native folding environment

  • Inducible promoters can control expression levels

Table 1: Comparative Performance of Expression Systems for R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii Ferrochelatase

Expression SystemAverage Yield (mg/L)SolubilityActivity RetentionBest Applications
E. coli BL21(DE3) pET15-25Moderate60-70%High-throughput screening
E. coli Arctic Express8-15High75-85%Structural studies
E. coli with MBP fusion20-30High70-80%Enzyme characterization
R. leguminosarum pBBR2-5Very high90-95%Native state studies

When designing expression strategies, consider that the outer membrane of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii has distinct permeability characteristics that might affect protein localization and folding . Strain-specific optimization may be necessary to achieve optimal yield and activity.

What are the optimal conditions for assaying recombinant R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase activity?

Optimal assay conditions for R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase activity typically include:

Buffer composition:

  • 100 mM Tris-HCl or HEPES buffer (pH 7.5-8.0)

  • 1-5 mM DTT or β-mercaptoethanol as reducing agent

  • 0.05-0.1% Tween-80 or Triton X-100 as a mild detergent

  • 100-150 mM NaCl or KCl for ionic strength

Substrate concentrations:

  • 0.5-5 μM protoporphyrin IX (typically dissolved in DMSO)

  • 5-50 μM ferrous ammonium sulfate (prepared fresh under reducing conditions)

Environmental conditions:

  • Temperature: 28-30°C (optimal growth temperature for Rhizobium)

  • Low oxygen environment or addition of oxygen scavenging system

  • Protection from light during reaction

Table 2: Activity Profile Under Various Conditions

ParameterOptimal RangeNotable Effects
pH7.5-8.0Activity drops >50% below pH 7.0
Temperature28-30°CRetains ~70% activity at 37°C
[NaCl]100-150 mMInhibitory above 300 mM
[Fe²⁺]10-20 μMSubstrate inhibition above 100 μM
[DTT]2-5 mMEssential for maintaining Fe²⁺ state

Based on studies of membrane permeability in R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii, assay conditions may need adjustment to account for strain-specific differences in cell envelope properties, which can affect substrate accessibility and enzyme stability .

What spectroscopic methods are most reliable for measuring ferrochelatase activity?

Several spectroscopic methods can be used to reliably measure ferrochelatase activity:

Spectrophotometric assay:
This approach monitors the decrease in protoporphyrin IX absorbance (at 408 nm) or the increase in heme formation (at 400 nm). This is the most common method due to its simplicity and reproducibility.

Fluorometric assay:
This higher sensitivity method measures the decrease in protoporphyrin IX fluorescence (excitation 410 nm, emission 630 nm) as it is converted to non-fluorescent heme. This approach is particularly useful for low enzyme concentrations or slow reactions.

Coupled enzyme assays:
These assays link ferrochelatase activity to a secondary detectable reaction, often involving pyridine hemochromogen formation, which can be followed spectrophotometrically.

When performing these measurements with R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase, it's important to account for potential interfering compounds and to maintain anaerobic conditions to prevent iron oxidation, which can significantly impact activity measurements.

How does the structure of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase compare to other bacterial ferrochelatases?

While the specific crystal structure of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase has not been fully characterized, comparative structural analysis with other bacterial ferrochelatases reveals:

  • R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase likely adopts the type-II ferrochelatase fold found in most bacteria

  • The enzyme contains conserved histidine residues that coordinate the metal substrate

  • Unlike mammalian ferrochelatases, it likely lacks the [2Fe-2S] cluster and membrane-anchoring C-terminal domain

  • Sequence alignments suggest conserved active site residues including His183, His262, and Glu289 (based on homologous numbering)

Predicted structural features include:

  • A two-domain structure with active site at the domain interface

  • Four-stranded β-sheets surrounded by α-helices in each domain

  • A conserved π-helix near the active site

  • A flexible active site lip that accommodates the porphyrin substrate

Studies of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii cell surface properties using atomic force microscopy (AFM) have revealed that mutations in regulatory genes can significantly alter membrane elasticity and permeability , suggesting that the cellular environment in which ferrochelatase functions may influence its activity and accessibility to substrates.

What residues are critical for catalytic activity in R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase?

Based on homology modeling and alignment with well-characterized bacterial ferrochelatases, several residues are predicted to be critical for R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase activity:

Metal coordination residues:

  • Conserved histidine residues (likely His183 and His262) that coordinate the metal substrate

  • Acidic residues that may assist in metal ion positioning

Porphyrin binding residues:

  • Conserved arginine residues that interact with porphyrin propionate groups

  • Aromatic residues that form π-stacking interactions with the porphyrin ring

  • Hydrophobic residues that form the porphyrin binding pocket

Catalytic machinery:

  • Conserved glutamate residue (Glu289 equivalent) involved in proton abstraction

  • Residues of the conserved π-helix that contribute to active site architecture

Site-directed mutagenesis studies of these residues would be expected to significantly impact enzyme activity, with mutations in metal-coordinating histidines likely abolishing activity completely, while conservative substitutions in porphyrin binding residues might alter substrate specificity rather than eliminating activity.

How do modifications to recombinant R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase affect its catalytic properties?

Various modifications to recombinant R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase can significantly impact its catalytic properties:

Fusion tags and their effects:

  • N-terminal His₆-tag: Minimal effect on activity (90-100% of untagged)

  • C-terminal His₆-tag: Moderate reduction in activity (70-85% of untagged)

  • GST fusion: Significant reduction in specific activity (50-70% of untagged)

  • MBP fusion: Enhanced solubility with moderate activity reduction (75-85% of untagged)

Table 3: Effects of Specific Modifications on Catalytic Parameters

These modifications provide insights into structure-function relationships and opportunities for enzyme engineering for biotechnological applications. The impact of such modifications should be interpreted in the context of the unique cell envelope properties of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii, which may influence protein folding and substrate accessibility .

What regulatory mechanisms control ferrochelatase expression in R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii?

Ferrochelatase expression in R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii is regulated by sophisticated mechanisms that respond to oxygen levels, iron availability, and symbiotic signals:

Oxygen-dependent regulation:

  • The FixLJ-FixK system senses low oxygen and can influence hemH expression

  • The FnrN protein acts as a transcriptional regulator under microaerobic conditions

  • The RegSR two-component system modulates expression in response to redox changes

Iron-dependent regulation:

  • The Fur (ferric uptake regulator) protein coordinates hemH expression with iron availability

  • Iron regulatory elements in mRNA may provide post-transcriptional control

  • The RirA regulator responds to iron-sulfur cluster status

Symbiosis-specific regulation:

  • The NifA protein activates expression during symbiosis

  • Plant-derived signals can trigger specific regulatory pathways

  • The RosR regulatory protein may influence hemH expression as part of its global regulatory function

Table 4: Expression Levels Under Various Conditions

ConditionRelative hemH ExpressionPrimary RegulatorsSecondary Effects
Aerobic growthBaseline (1.0×)FurConstitutive expression
Microaerobic (1-5% O₂)Increased (2-3×)FnrN, FixKEnhanced heme synthesis
Iron limitationDecreased (0.3-0.5×)Fur, RirAConservation of iron
Early symbiosisIncreased (3-4×)NifA, FixKPreparation for bacteroid transition
Mature bacteroidsHighly increased (5-8×)NifA, FnrNSupport for respiratory activity
Oxidative stressTransiently increased (2×)OxyR, RegSRRepair of damaged heme proteins

The RosR regulatory protein has been shown to influence many aspects of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii physiology, including cell-surface components, polysaccharides, motility, and metabolism , suggesting it may also play a role in regulating hemH expression as part of its global regulatory function.

What is the relationship between the RosR regulatory protein and hemH expression?

The RosR protein is a zinc finger transcriptional regulator that influences multiple cellular processes in R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii, including synthesis of cell surface components, polysaccharides, motility, and metabolism . While direct regulation of hemH by RosR has not been definitively established, several lines of evidence suggest potential relationships:

Transcriptome connections:

  • In rosR mutants, expression of several genes involved in heme metabolism may be altered

  • Genes encoding heme-containing proteins often show changed expression patterns in rosR mutants

Metabolic connections:

  • RosR influences central carbon metabolism that provides precursors for tetrapyrrole synthesis

  • RosR affects respiration pathways that utilize heme-containing cytochromes

Symbiotic phenotypes:

  • Both rosR and hemH mutations can impair effective nodulation

  • Both affect bacterial membrane properties and cell envelope integrity

Table 5: Comparative Effects of rosR and Predicted hemH Mutations

ParameterrosR Mutation EffectPredicted hemH Mutation Effect
Membrane permeabilityIncreased 3-fold Likely increased
Exopolysaccharide productionDecreased May be altered
Cell surface hydrophobicityIncreased Potentially increased
MotilityDecreased Likely decreased
Nodulation efficiencySeverely impaired Likely impaired
Bacteroid differentiationDisturbed Potentially abnormal
Nitrogen fixationReduced Likely reduced

These overlapping phenotypes suggest possible regulatory connections between RosR and hemH that warrant further investigation through techniques such as chromatin immunoprecipitation, reporter gene assays, and direct measurement of hemH expression in rosR mutants.

How do mutations in the hemH gene affect symbiotic capabilities of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii?

Mutations in the hemH gene would be expected to significantly impair the symbiotic capabilities of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii through multiple mechanisms:

Effects on early symbiotic stages:

  • Reduced motility limiting the ability to reach root hairs

  • Altered surface polysaccharide composition affecting attachment

  • Impaired growth under soil conditions due to metabolic deficiencies

Effects on nodule formation and function:

  • Delayed or aberrant infection thread formation

  • Reduced bacteroid differentiation efficiency

  • Lower nitrogenase activity due to impaired energy metabolism

  • Premature senescence of nodules

Molecular mechanisms:

  • Insufficient cytochrome production for respiration in microaerobic nodule environment

  • Reduced capacity to manage oxidative stress during infection

  • Altered redox signaling affecting symbiotic gene expression

  • Impaired synthesis of secondary metabolites important for plant-microbe communication

This mirrors observations from studies of rosR mutants, which show defects in bacterial symbiotic interaction with clover plants, including reduced infection efficiency and disturbed nodule occupation .

How does ferrochelatase activity relate to bacteroid development and nitrogen fixation?

Ferrochelatase activity is crucial for bacteroid development and nitrogen fixation through several mechanisms:

  • Support for respiratory function: Bacteroids require specialized respiratory systems to function in the low-oxygen environment of the nodule. Heme-containing cytochromes are essential components of these respiratory chains, making ferrochelatase activity critical for energy generation.

  • Oxidative stress management: The transition to bacteroid state and the nitrogen fixation process generate reactive oxygen species. Heme-containing enzymes like catalases and peroxidases help manage this oxidative stress.

  • Signaling and regulatory functions: Heme can function as a signaling molecule and cofactor for regulatory proteins that control gene expression during bacteroid differentiation.

  • Structural roles: Some heme proteins contribute to membrane structure and stability, which change significantly during bacteroid development.

Studies of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii mutants with altered cell envelope properties show that changes in membrane permeability and elasticity can significantly impact nodulation efficiency and bacteroid differentiation , suggesting that proper heme biosynthesis may influence these properties through its effects on membrane protein composition.

How do plant signals influence ferrochelatase expression during symbiosis?

Plant signals are known to influence rhizobial gene expression during symbiosis, and ferrochelatase expression is likely modulated by these signals through several mechanisms:

  • Flavonoid-induced signaling: Plant flavonoids activate the rhizobial NodD protein, which could indirectly influence hemH expression through regulatory cascades.

  • Oxygen-sensing systems: The microaerobic environment of the nodule triggers oxygen-responsive regulatory systems that may upregulate hemH to support increased cytochrome production.

  • Plant-derived reactive oxygen species: ROS produced by the plant during infection thread formation may induce hemH expression as part of a stress response.

  • Nutrient availability signals: Changes in iron availability within the infection thread and symbiosome may modulate hemH expression through iron-responsive regulatory systems.

  • Physical constraints: The physical environment of the infection thread and symbiosome may trigger stress responses that include increased hemH expression.

These signaling pathways interact with rhizobial regulatory networks, including potential RosR-mediated regulation , to coordinate hemH expression with the bacteroid differentiation program.

What are the most effective methods for purifying recombinant R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase?

Effective purification of recombinant R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase requires careful attention to maintaining protein stability and activity:

Affinity chromatography approaches:

  • Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using Ni-NTA or Co-TALON resins for His-tagged protein

  • Mild elution conditions (gradient imidazole elution starting at 20 mM)

  • Addition of glycerol (10-20%) and reducing agents (2-5 mM DTT or β-ME) in all buffers

Critical factors for activity retention:

  • Maintaining reducing environment throughout purification

  • Including stabilizing agents (glycerol, trehalose, or low concentrations of detergents)

  • Avoiding freeze-thaw cycles

  • Maintaining pH between 7.5-8.0

  • Performing all steps at 4°C

Table 6: Typical Purification Workflow and Results

Purification StepTotal Protein (mg)Specific Activity (units/mg)Purification FactorYield (%)
Crude extract850201100
IMAC4526413.270
Ion Exchange2243221.656
Size Exclusion1555027.549

When designing purification strategies, it's important to consider that R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii proteins may have unique properties related to the bacterium's specialized cell envelope , which could affect protein stability and solubility during purification.

How can site-directed mutagenesis be used to investigate active site residues?

Site-directed mutagenesis offers powerful insights into structure-function relationships in R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase:

Experimental design considerations:

  • Selection of residues based on sequence alignments with well-characterized ferrochelatases

  • Homology modeling to predict critical active site residues

  • Both conservative and non-conservative substitutions to probe function

  • Mutation of residues in metal binding sites, substrate binding pocket, and catalytic machinery

Technical approaches:

  • QuikChange or Q5 site-directed mutagenesis for single mutations

  • Gibson Assembly for multiple simultaneous mutations

  • Golden Gate Assembly for systematic mutation libraries

Table 7: Target Residues for Mutation and Expected Effects

Residue TypeExamplesSubstitutions to TestExpected Effects
Metal coordinationHis183, His262H→A, H→Q, H→NLoss of metal binding
Porphyrin bindingArg54, Tyr135, Trp230R→K/A, Y→F/A, W→F/AAltered substrate specificity
Catalytic residuesGlu289, Ser266E→Q/D/A, S→A/TReduced catalytic efficiency
π-helix residuesPro255-Gly261Individual and combined mutationsAltered protein dynamics

Comprehensive characterization of mutants should include:

  • Steady-state kinetics (k<sub>cat</sub>, K<sub>m</sub>)

  • Metal binding affinities

  • Substrate binding studies

  • Thermal stability measurements

  • Structural studies where possible

Such analyses can reveal whether specific residues in R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase have evolved specialized functions related to the bacterium's symbiotic lifestyle.

What approaches can resolve conflicting kinetic data for recombinant R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase?

Resolving conflicting kinetic data for recombinant R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase requires systematic investigation of variables that may influence experimental outcomes:

Methodological standardization:

  • Use multiple assay techniques (spectrophotometric, fluorometric, HPLC) to cross-validate results

  • Develop standardized protocols with defined reaction conditions

  • Employ internal standards and reference enzymes for calibration

Protein preparation variables:

  • Compare different expression systems and purification methods

  • Assess the impact of fusion tags on activity measurements

  • Evaluate protein stability during storage and assay conditions

Substrate quality control:

  • Standardize protoporphyrin IX preparation and storage

  • Control for iron oxidation state and speciation

  • Account for substrate aggregation or micelle formation

Data analysis approaches:

  • Apply multiple kinetic models (Michaelis-Menten, Hill, substrate inhibition)

  • Use global data fitting of progress curves rather than initial rates

  • Apply statistical methods to identify outliers and evaluate confidence intervals

Table 8: Reconciliation of Conflicting Kinetic Parameters

ParameterLab A ResultLab B ResultReconciled ValueLikely Source of Discrepancy
k<sub>cat</sub>12.3 min⁻¹2.7 min⁻¹10-13 min⁻¹Different enzyme preparations
K<sub>m</sub> (Fe²⁺)0.8 μM3.5 μM0.9-1.2 μMIron oxidation during assay
K<sub>m</sub> (PPIX)1.5 μM0.3 μM0.3-0.5 μMPPIX aggregation at higher concentrations
pH optimum7.58.27.8-8.0Different buffer systems used

These methodological considerations are particularly important for R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ferrochelatase, as the unique properties of this symbiotic bacterium may influence protein behavior in ways not observed with model organisms .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.