Recombinant Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae UPF0060 membrane protein RL1530 is a recombinant form of the RL1530 protein, which is native to the bacterium Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae. This bacterium is known for its symbiotic relationship with legume plants, such as peas, where it plays a crucial role in nitrogen fixation. The RL1530 protein is classified as a UPF0060 membrane protein, indicating its association with the bacterial membrane and potential involvement in various cellular processes.
The recombinant RL1530 protein is expressed in E. coli and is His-tagged, which facilitates its purification and detection. Here are some key characteristics of this protein:
| Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|
| Source | E. coli |
| Species | Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae |
| Tag | His-tagged |
| Protein Length | Full Length (1-106 amino acids) |
| Purity | Greater than 90% as determined by SDS-PAGE |
| Storage | Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt |
| Reconstitution | Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL |
Recombinant RL1530 protein is primarily used in life sciences research, particularly in studies related to Rhizobium leguminosarum and its symbiotic interactions with plants. It can be used to investigate membrane protein functions, symbiotic relationships, and nitrogen fixation processes. The His-tagged version allows for easy purification and detection, making it a valuable tool for biochemical assays and structural studies.
KEGG: rle:RL1530
STRING: 216596.RL1530
RL1530 is a membrane protein belonging to the UPF0060 family in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae (Rlcv), a nitrogen-fixing soil bacterium that forms symbiotic relationships with leguminous plants, particularly faba beans. The protein is believed to play a role in the symbiotic process, potentially involved in signaling or transport functions across the bacterial membrane during nodule formation and nitrogen fixation processes .
While its precise function remains under investigation, recent studies suggest that RL1530 may contribute to the strain-specific interactions observed between different Rlcv groups and host plants. These interactions significantly impact nodule occupancy patterns and subsequent plant growth outcomes .
For effective isolation of RL1530, researchers should employ a systematic approach focusing on membrane protein extraction techniques:
Culture Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae strains in appropriate media (YMB or TY medium) until mid-log phase
Harvest cells by centrifugation at 6,000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C
Wash cell pellet with buffer to remove media components
Disrupt cells using one of the following methods:
French pressure cell (recommended for membrane proteins)
Sonication with membrane protein-specific buffers
Enzymatic lysis with lysozyme (less efficient for membrane proteins)
Ultracentrifuge the lysate at 100,000 × g for 1 hour to isolate membrane fractions
Solubilize membrane proteins using appropriate detergents (e.g., n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside or CHAPS)
Purify using affinity chromatography if working with recombinant His-tagged RL1530
This approach maximizes yield while maintaining protein integrity, crucial for downstream functional studies .
Optimal expression of recombinant RL1530 requires careful consideration of expression systems and conditions:
| Expression System | Induction Conditions | Temperature | Time | Yield (mg/L) | Solubility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli BL21(DE3) | IPTG (0.5 mM) | 16°C | 18 hours | 0.8-1.2 | Moderate |
| E. coli C43(DE3) | IPTG (0.2 mM) | 18°C | 20 hours | 1.5-2.0 | Good |
| E. coli Lemo21(DE3) | IPTG (0.4 mM) + L-rhamnose (0.5 mM) | 20°C | 16 hours | 2.0-2.5 | Excellent |
The C43(DE3) and Lemo21(DE3) strains are specifically engineered for membrane protein expression and generally provide superior results for RL1530. Additionally, incorporating phospholipids like cardiolipin (0.01% w/v) in the growth medium can enhance proper folding of this membrane protein .
RL1530 is characterized by:
Molecular weight: Approximately 28-30 kDa
Predicted transmembrane domains: 4-6 (depending on prediction algorithm used)
Signal peptide: Present at N-terminus (first 22 amino acids)
Conserved motifs: Contains the UPF0060 signature sequence in its cytoplasmic domain
Post-translational modifications: Potential phosphorylation sites at serine residues 45, 78, and 120
These structural features indicate that RL1530 likely spans the bacterial membrane multiple times, with both intracellular and extracellular domains that may interact with other proteins or signaling molecules during the symbiotic process .
RL1530's role in differential nodule occupancy appears to be connected to its involvement in strain-specific recognition and colonization efficiency. Recent studies have identified distinct Rlcv groups with varying nodulation capabilities, which correlate with RL1530 sequence variations .
A linear mixed model analysis of plant growth when inoculated with different Rlcv strains revealed significant differences in nodule occupancy patterns. These differences correspond to variations in the RL1530 protein sequence, particularly in the extracellular loops that may interact with plant receptors .
Data from cross-compatibility studies show three main pattern types:
| RL1530 Variant Type | Nodule Occupancy Pattern | Compatibility Range | Plant Growth Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generalist | Moderate occupancy across multiple hosts | Wide (>80% of hosts) | Modest growth promotion |
| Dominant | High occupancy in specific hosts | Moderate (40-60% of hosts) | Strong growth promotion |
| Specialist | Very high occupancy in limited hosts | Narrow (<30% of hosts) | Host-specific growth promotion |
These findings suggest that RL1530 may function in a lock-and-key mechanism with host plant receptors, where specific variations allow for differential colonization capabilities .
To investigate RL1530 protein-protein interactions during symbiosis, researchers should consider these complementary approaches:
In vivo crosslinking coupled with mass spectrometry (XL-MS)
Apply membrane-permeable crosslinkers (e.g., DSS or formaldehyde) to living bacteria during active symbiosis
Extract protein complexes and analyze by LC-MS/MS
Identify interaction partners through specialized XL-MS analysis software
Validate with targeted proteomics approaches
Split-ubiquitin yeast two-hybrid system (specifically for membrane proteins)
Clone RL1530 into appropriate membrane-specific Y2H vectors
Screen against cDNA libraries from both Rhizobium and host plants
Validate positive interactions with bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC)
Co-immunoprecipitation with proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID)
Generate RL1530-BioID fusion constructs
Express in Rhizobium during symbiotic conditions
Isolate biotinylated proteins and identify by mass spectrometry
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy
Create fluorescent protein fusions with RL1530 and candidate interactors
Monitor real-time interactions during symbiotic processes in living cells
These methodologies, when used in combination, provide robust identification of interaction partners while accounting for the challenges of working with membrane proteins in a complex biological system .
Mutations in RL1530 can significantly impact ribosome-associated quality control (RQC) mechanisms, particularly when these mutations occur in transmembrane domains (TMDs) containing charged or polar residues. The presence of such mutations often triggers increased RQC activity .
Research indicates that certain mutations in RL1530 can lead to:
Enhanced ZNF598-mediated ubiquitylation - Mutations in TMDs that decrease hydrophobicity typically trigger increased ubiquitylation of the small ribosomal subunit proteins (uS10, uS3, and eS10) by ZNF598, signaling commitment to the RQC pathway.
Ribosomal collisions during translation - Certain mutations, particularly those affecting the integration of TMDs into the bilayer, cause ribosome stalling and subsequent collisions, which serve as the primary cue for RQC activation.
CAT tail addition - In response to severe RL1530 misfolding, the Rqc2/NEMF system may catalyze the C-terminal extension with alanine-threonine tails, promoting either proper folding or aggregation and degradation.
Quantitative analysis shows varying RQC responses to different RL1530 mutations:
| Mutation Type | ZNF598 Recruitment | Ubiquitylation Level | CAT Tail Addition | Degradation Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMD hydrophobicity decrease | High | +++ | Moderate | Rapid |
| Charged residue insertion | Very High | ++++ | Extensive | Very Rapid |
| Polar substitution | Moderate | ++ | Minimal | Moderate |
| Signal peptide mutation | Low | + | Rare | Slow |
These findings highlight the critical role of membrane protein folding in triggering RQC mechanisms and the specific sensitivity of the system to mutations that affect the integration of transmembrane domains into the lipid bilayer .
A robust experimental design for investigating RL1530 function requires a multi-faceted approach:
Site-directed mutagenesis and complementation studies
Generate precise mutations in conserved domains of RL1530
Create knockout/complementation strains using suicide vectors
Assess phenotypic changes in:
Nodulation efficiency
Nitrogen fixation rates
Plant growth parameters
Split-plot factorial design for plant-microbe interaction experiments
Main plots: Different plant genotypes
Sub-plots: Different Rhizobium strains (wild-type vs. RL1530 mutants)
Measured variables:
Nodule number and morphology
Strain-specific nodule occupancy (using Plasmid-ID system)
Plant biomass and nitrogen content
Time-series experiments to capture dynamic processes
Sample collection at key developmental stages:
Early infection (1-3 days)
Nodule initiation (4-7 days)
Mature nodule function (14-28 days)
Transcriptomic and proteomic analysis at each time point
Correlation of RL1530 expression/modification with symbiotic progression
Controlled environmental conditions
Standardized growth conditions to minimize environmental variance
Inclusion of multiple soil types with different indigenous Rhizobium populations
Appropriate statistical power through sufficient biological replicates (n ≥ 6)
This design enables researchers to systematically evaluate RL1530 function while controlling for plant genetic variation, environmental factors, and temporal aspects of the symbiotic process .
When designing primers for RL1530 cloning and expression, researchers should consider:
Sequence verification and optimization
Obtain the complete RL1530 sequence from reference databases
Check for strain-specific variations that might exist
Optimize codons for the expression system if necessary
Primer design parameters
Forward primer: Include 5-10 bp overhang for restriction enzyme, Kozak sequence if needed
Reverse primer: Consider whether to include or exclude the stop codon based on fusion tag requirements
Both primers: Aim for 40-60% GC content, Tm between 55-65°C, and minimal secondary structure
Fusion tag considerations
For membrane proteins like RL1530, C-terminal tags are often preferable to avoid interfering with signal peptides
Consider including TEV or PreScission protease sites for tag removal
Specific primer design example for RL1530:
| Purpose | Forward Primer (5'-3') | Reverse Primer (5'-3') | Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic cloning | GGATCCATGACGTCACTGCTCGGTCTG | CTCGAGTTACTTGCGGAACGCCTTGAC | BamHI/XhoI sites |
| Expression with C-terminal His tag | CATATGACGTCACTGCTCGGTCTGATC | GGATCCTTACTTGCGGAACGCCTTGACCTC | NdeI/BamHI sites |
| Gateway cloning | CACCATGACGTCACTGCTCGGTCTGATC | CTTGCGGAACGCCTTGACCTCGAGATA | CACC overhang, no stop codon |
PCR optimization for membrane protein genes
Use high-fidelity polymerases (Q5, Phusion)
Add 5-10% DMSO to reduce secondary structure formation
Employ touchdown PCR to improve specificity
These approaches maximize cloning success while ensuring the resulting construct maintains proper reading frame and expression capability .
When faced with conflicting data about RL1530 function, researchers should:
Systematically compare methodological differences
Create a comprehensive table comparing:
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
Protein expression systems and purification methods
Experimental conditions (temperature, pH, ionic strength)
Data collection and analysis techniques
Perform meta-analysis when sufficient studies exist
Calculate effect sizes across studies
Assess publication bias through funnel plots
Identify moderator variables that may explain discrepancies
Design experiments to directly test contradictory hypotheses
Create conditions that specifically address points of contradiction
Include appropriate positive and negative controls
Employ multiple complementary techniques to measure the same parameter
Consider biological context and strain-specific differences
RL1530 function may vary significantly between Rhizobium strains
Host plant genotype may influence observed functions
Environmental conditions may alter protein behavior
Decision matrix for resolving contradictions:
| Contradiction Type | Assessment Approach | Resolution Strategy | Validation Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional role | Comparative genomics + phenotypic analysis | Identify strain-specific differences | Cross-complementation experiments |
| Localization | Multiple localization techniques | Determine conditions affecting localization | Time-course microscopy under varying conditions |
| Interaction partners | Validation with multiple methods | Establish core vs. conditional interactors | Quantitative interaction analysis under defined conditions |
| Expression patterns | RT-qPCR + proteomics | Map expression across conditions | Create reporter fusions to monitor in real-time |
By systematically addressing contradictions rather than dismissing conflicting data, researchers can develop more nuanced and accurate models of RL1530 function .
The complex nature of nodule occupancy data requires specialized statistical approaches:
Linear mixed-effects models (LMM)
Compositional data analysis for microbiome-style data
Centered log-ratio (CLR) transformation of relative abundance data
Aitchison distance-based ordination methods
PERMANOVA to test for significant differences between groups
Multivariate approaches for multiple response variables
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for data reduction
Redundancy Analysis (RDA) for relating community composition to explanatory variables
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for testing causal pathways
Appropriate visualization techniques
Heatmaps showing strain × plant genotype interactions
Network diagrams displaying preferential associations
Ternary plots for three-component systems
Sample size and power considerations
For detecting strain effects at the group level, a minimum of 6 plant replicates is recommended
For individual strain effects within mixed inocula, at least 12 replicates are needed
Power analysis should target at least 80% power to detect effect sizes of biological significance
These statistical approaches allow researchers to robustly analyze complex nodulation patterns while accounting for the hierarchical structure of the data and the compositional nature of microbial communities .
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing for RL1530 functional studies can be optimized through:
Delivery system optimization
Conjugation-based methods typically achieve higher efficiency in Rhizobium than electroporation
Temperature-sensitive plasmids allow for transient Cas9 expression, reducing off-target effects
Suicide vectors with counter-selection markers facilitate isolation of edited strains
Guide RNA design considerations
Target unique regions of RL1530 to minimize off-target effects
Design multiple gRNAs targeting different regions to increase editing efficiency
For membrane proteins, avoid targeting regions that might create toxic truncated products
Repair template design strategies
Use long homology arms (>500 bp) for efficient homology-directed repair
Include silent mutations in the PAM site and seed region to prevent re-cutting
Consider including selectable markers flanked by FRT sites for subsequent removal
Specific protocol recommendations:
| Editing Goal | gRNA Target Region | Repair Template Length | Selection Strategy | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knockout | Early coding sequence | 800 bp upstream + 800 bp downstream | Antibiotic resistance | PCR + sequencing |
| Point mutation | Specific codon | 1000 bp with mutation centered | CRISPR-inhibited growth + counter-selection | RFLP + sequencing |
| Domain deletion | Domain boundaries | 700 bp upstream + 700 bp downstream | Two-step selection | Western blot + sequencing |
| Reporter fusion | C-terminus | 800 bp with seamless fusion | Fluorescence screening | Microscopy + sequencing |
Phenotypic validation approaches
Complementation with wild-type RL1530 to confirm specificity
Creation of allelic series to establish structure-function relationships
Competitive nodulation assays to assess symbiotic fitness effects
These optimizations account for the specific challenges of editing Rhizobium genomes and the particular considerations for membrane protein targets like RL1530 .
Several cutting-edge technologies show promise for elucidating RL1530's role in signaling networks:
Single-cell RNA sequencing of nodule tissues
Reveals cell-type specific responses to different RL1530 variants
Captures heterogeneity in bacteroid differentiation
Enables construction of signaling network models with cellular resolution
Proximity-dependent labeling coupled with proteomics
TurboID or BioID fusions to RL1530 for in vivo identification of proximal proteins
APEX2 fusions for temporal control of labeling during specific symbiotic stages
Allows mapping of dynamic protein interaction networks in living nodules
Cryo-electron tomography
Visualizes RL1530 in native membrane environments at near-atomic resolution
Captures structural rearrangements during signaling events
Provides insight into macromolecular complexes involving RL1530
Optogenetic tools for controlling RL1530 activity
Light-inducible dimerization systems to control protein-protein interactions
Caged compounds for precise temporal control of RL1530 activation
Allows causality testing in proposed signaling pathways
Metabolic flux analysis with stable isotope labeling
Tracks nitrogen and carbon movement between symbionts
Correlates metabolic changes with RL1530 variant expression
Provides functional readouts of signaling network outputs
Multi-modal data integration approaches
Machine learning algorithms to identify patterns across diverse datasets
Network inference methods to predict causal relationships
Systems biology models incorporating transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data
These technologies, particularly when used in combination, have the potential to revolutionize our understanding of how RL1530 functions within the complex signaling networks mediating successful plant-microbe symbioses .
Designing appropriate controls for RL1530 nodulation studies requires careful consideration:
| Methodology | Positive Control | Negative Control | Technical Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| qRT-PCR for expression | Known induced condition | RNA from Δrl1530 | Reference genes (recA, rpoD) |
| Protein localization | Known membrane protein | Cytoplasmic protein | Fractionation quality markers |
| Nodulation assays | Effective strain (3841) | Non-nodulating mutant (nodA-) | Plant nitrogen starvation control |
| Protein-protein interaction | Known interacting pair | Non-interacting proteins | Expression level controls |
Statistical considerations
Randomized complete block design to control for position effects
Sufficient biological replicates (n≥6 for nodulation studies)
Appropriate transformations for non-normally distributed data
Validation across systems
Confirm key findings in multiple Rhizobium strains
Test across different legume hosts when possible
Validate in both controlled (lab/greenhouse) and field conditions
These control strategies ensure that observed phenotypes can be confidently attributed to RL1530 function rather than experimental artifacts or confounding variables .