Recombinant Rhizobium sp. Probable translocation protein y4yM (NGR_a00600)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: We will prioritize shipping the format we currently have in stock. However, if you have a specific format requirement, please indicate it when placing your order. We will prepare the product according to your request.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchasing method or location. Please consult your local distributors for specific delivery information.
Note: All our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. If you require dry ice shipping, please notify us in advance, as additional fees will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. For optimal results, store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend centrifuging the vial briefly before opening to ensure the contents are at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%. Customers may use this as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life is influenced by multiple factors, including storage conditions, buffer components, temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein.
Generally, liquid form has a shelf life of 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form has a shelf life of 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is recommended for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type will be determined during the production process. If you have a specific tag type requirement, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing the specified tag.
Synonyms
NGR_a00600; y4yM; Probable translocation protein y4yM
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-91
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Sinorhizobium fredii (strain NBRC 101917 / NGR234)
Target Names
NGR_a00600
Target Protein Sequence
MTGSSIVSLMSQSLVVFMIWILPPLIASVIVGLTIGIIQAATQIQDESLPLTVKLLVVVA VIGLFAPVLSAPLIELADQIFTEFPAMTLGY
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein is potentially involved in the secretion of an unidentified factor.
Database Links
Protein Families
FliQ/MopD/SpaQ family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the Recombinant Rhizobium sp. Probable Translocation Protein Y4yM (NGR_a00600)?

Recombinant Rhizobium sp. Probable Translocation Protein Y4yM (NGR_a00600) is a full-length protein (91 amino acids) from Sinorhizobium fredii, also known as Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234. As a probable translocation protein, NGR_a00600 likely plays a role in protein secretion or transport across bacterial membranes. This protein is particularly significant because it originates from NGR234, a unique alphaproteobacterium that forms nitrogen-fixing nodules with more legume species than any other known microsymbiont . The strain's exceptional symbiotic versatility makes its translocation proteins of special interest for understanding plant-microbe interactions. NGR234 possesses an extraordinary number of secretion systems compared to most known bacteria, with 132 genes and proteins linked to secretory processes , suggesting a complex and sophisticated protein translocation machinery.

What secretion systems exist in Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234, and how might NGR_a00600 fit within them?

Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 possesses an unusually diverse array of secretion systems. The strain contains general and export pathways, a twin arginine translocase secretion system, six type I transporter genes, one functional and one putative type III system, three type IV attachment systems, and two putative type IV conjugation pili . Notably, Type V and VI transporters were not identified in NGR234. As a probable translocation protein, NGR_a00600 could potentially function within any of these systems, though based on its classification, it may be associated with the Type III Secretion System (TTSS). The TTSS in NGR234 is known to be functional and delivers proteins called Nodulation Outer Proteins (Nops) to the exterior of the cell . Understanding the specific secretion system association of NGR_a00600 would require experimental investigation, potentially through mutational analyses and protein interaction studies.

How is NGR_a00600 protein typically expressed and purified for research purposes?

The recombinant NGR_a00600 protein can be expressed in E. coli expression systems, as demonstrated by commercial production of His-tagged versions of the full-length protein (1-91 amino acids) . For laboratory expression, researchers typically use vectors containing strong promoters suitable for bacterial expression (such as T7 or tac promoters) with affinity tags to facilitate purification. The expression protocol would involve transformation of the construct into an appropriate E. coli strain (commonly BL21(DE3) or derivatives), followed by culture growth, induction of protein expression, and cell harvesting.

For purification, a step-wise approach is recommended:

  • Cell lysis using mechanical disruption or chemical methods

  • Initial capture using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged versions

  • Intermediate purification via ion exchange chromatography

  • Polishing via size exclusion chromatography

  • Quality assessment through SDS-PAGE, Western blotting, and mass spectrometry

Buffer composition is critical, typically including pH stabilization (7.0-8.0), moderate salt concentration (150-300 mM NaCl), and potentially stabilizing agents like glycerol (5-10%). As a probable membrane-associated protein, detergents may be necessary to maintain solubility throughout the purification process.

How does NGR_a00600 relate to the symbiotic capabilities of Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234?

The exceptional host range of Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234, which can nodulate more than 120 genera of legumes and even the non-legume Parasponia, depends on complex signal exchange mechanisms . As a probable translocation protein, NGR_a00600 may contribute to this process by facilitating the secretion of symbiotic factors that influence host specificity. The genome of NGR234 contains numerous genes encoding secretory proteins that likely participate in the molecular dialogue between the bacterium and its host plants .

Many bacterial proteins secreted through the Type III secretion system function as effectors that can either promote or inhibit nodulation, depending on the host plant. If NGR_a00600 is involved in this system, it could influence host range determination. Comparative studies of symbiotic-related genes between different Rhizobium strains have shown considerable variation, with homology as low as 69-82% for some genes involved in Nod factor synthesis and nitrogen fixation . This variability underscores the importance of strain-specific translocation mechanisms in establishing successful symbiosis.

What approaches can be used to study the translocation function of NGR_a00600?

Investigating the translocation function of NGR_a00600 requires a multi-faceted experimental approach:

  • Genetic manipulation studies:

    • Generate knockout mutants of NGR_a00600 in Rhizobium sp. NGR234

    • Assess phenotypic changes in secretion profiles and symbiotic capabilities

    • Create complementation strains to verify observed phenotypes

    • Develop reporter gene fusions to monitor expression under different conditions

  • Protein localization experiments:

    • Immunogold electron microscopy to visualize protein location within bacterial cells

    • Subcellular fractionation followed by Western blot analysis

    • Fluorescent protein fusions to track localization in living cells

    • Protease accessibility assays to determine membrane topology

  • Protein-protein interaction analyses:

    • Co-immunoprecipitation to identify interaction partners

    • Bacterial two-hybrid screening against genomic libraries

    • Pull-down assays using purified recombinant NGR_a00600

    • Cross-linking experiments to capture transient interactions

  • Functional reconstitution:

    • In vitro translocation assays using purified components

    • Liposome-based systems to study membrane interactions

    • Complementation assays in different secretion system mutants

A proteomics approach comparing secreted proteins between wild-type NGR234 and secretion system mutants can be particularly informative, as demonstrated by previous studies on Nops proteins . This method can help overcome the challenge of detecting low-abundance secreted proteins by employing two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and comparative analysis.

How can researchers optimize expression conditions to maintain the native structure of NGR_a00600?

Optimizing expression conditions for NGR_a00600 to maintain its native structure requires systematic evaluation of multiple parameters:

ParameterOptions to TestConsiderations
Expression hostE. coli BL21(DE3), Rosetta, Arctic Express, Rhizobium strainsSelect based on codon usage, folding requirements
Growth temperature37°C, 30°C, 25°C, 18°C, 16°CLower temperatures often improve folding
Induction methodIPTG concentration (0.01-1.0 mM), auto-inductionSlower induction may improve folding
Media compositionLB, TB, 2xYT, minimal media, supplementationRich media for high yield, minimal for labeled protein
Co-expression factorsChaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK/J/GrpE), rare tRNAsMay improve folding of difficult proteins
Fusion partnersHis-tag, MBP, GST, SUMO, ThioredoxinSolubility enhancement and purification strategy

When working with translocation proteins like NGR_a00600, which may contain membrane-interactive domains, special considerations include:

  • The addition of membrane-mimicking components during purification (detergents or amphipols)

  • Stabilizing agents in buffers (glycerol, arginine, specific ions)

  • Protection from oxidation by including reducing agents (DTT, TCEP)

  • Minimizing time between cell disruption and purification steps

For quality assessment, combine multiple techniques: circular dichroism to evaluate secondary structure, thermal shift assays for stability assessment, and activity assays if available. The structure and function of translocation proteins are intimately connected, so maintaining native conformation is essential for meaningful functional studies.

What strategies can help resolve contradictory data when studying NGR_a00600 function?

Resolving contradictory data in NGR_a00600 research requires systematic troubleshooting and experimental design considerations:

  • Evaluate experimental conditions:

    • Standardize growth conditions across experiments (media, temperature, growth phase)

    • Document all buffer compositions and experimental parameters meticulously

    • Develop positive and negative controls specific to each assay

    • Consider whether differences in protein preparation affect function

  • Validate reagents and strains:

    • Sequence-verify all constructs before use

    • Check for mutations in bacterial strains

    • Validate antibody specificity through appropriate controls

    • Ensure protein quality by multiple analytical methods

  • Consider context-dependent functions:

    • Test function under different physiological conditions

    • Evaluate activity in the presence of potential interaction partners

    • Assess function at different stages of the symbiotic process

    • Examine effects in multiple host plant species

  • Apply complementary techniques:

    • Use multiple independent methods to address the same question

    • Combine in vitro and in vivo approaches

    • Implement both genetic and biochemical strategies

    • Utilize structural insights to guide functional studies

  • Statistical analysis:

    • Determine appropriate sample sizes through power analysis

    • Apply rigorous statistical tests suitable for the data type

    • Consider biological versus technical replication

    • Implement blinding procedures when possible

In bacterial secretion systems, contradictory results often stem from the complex, context-dependent nature of protein translocation. By systematically varying conditions and combining multiple experimental approaches, researchers can develop more comprehensive models that reconcile apparently conflicting observations.

How does the mechanism of NGR_a00600-mediated translocation compare to other known protein translocation systems?

Protein translocation across membranes occurs through several distinct mechanisms, and understanding where NGR_a00600 fits within this landscape requires comparative analysis:

  • Channel-dependent translocation:
    The Sec61/SecY system represents the canonical pathway, forming a hydrophilic, hourglass-shaped channel with a lateral gate toward surrounding lipids . This well-studied mechanism primarily handles unfolded proteins.

  • Membrane distortion mechanisms:
    Recent studies reveal that some proteins cross membranes without requiring a continuous aqueous channel. The Hrd1 complex, which mediates retro-translocation of misfolded proteins from the ER lumen to the cytosol, contains multi-spanning proteins with aqueous cavities and lateral gates positioned in thinned membrane regions . This locally distorted lipid bilayer facilitates protein movement across the membrane barrier.

  • YidC-mediated insertion:
    YidC in bacteria (and homologs Oxa1 in mitochondria, Alb3 in chloroplasts) mediate membrane protein insertion through a mechanism involving local membrane thinning. These proteins form structures with deep cytosolic cavities and openings toward the lipid environment . MD simulations show that the short length of transmembrane segments causes local membrane thinning and allows water molecules to penetrate deep into the membrane.

  • Tim22 complex mechanism:
    The Tim22 complex inserts mitochondrial solute transporters without forming continuous hydrophilic channels. Instead, it creates a curved surface inside the membrane with charged residues positioned within normal membrane boundaries . Mutation of these amino acids abolishes Tim22 function.

NGR_a00600, as a probable translocation protein in Rhizobium sp. NGR234, could potentially function through any of these mechanisms. Detailed structural and functional studies would be needed to determine its specific mode of action. Given the diverse secretion systems present in NGR234 , it may employ mechanisms that combine elements from multiple known systems or represent a novel translocation strategy altogether.

What is the relationship between NGR_a00600 and the Type III secretion system in Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234?

Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 possesses a functional Type III secretion system (T3SS) that delivers proteins called Nodulation Outer Proteins (Nops) to the exterior of the cell . The relationship between NGR_a00600 and this system requires investigation through several approaches:

  • Genetic interaction studies:

    • Generate double mutants of NGR_a00600 and key T3SS components

    • Compare secretion profiles of NGR_a00600 mutants with T3SS mutants (e.g., rhcN mutant)

    • Test whether NGR_a00600 overexpression affects T3SS function

    • Analyze expression patterns of NGR_a00600 and T3SS genes under various conditions

  • Protein-protein interaction analyses:

    • Investigate direct interactions between NGR_a00600 and T3SS components

    • Determine if NGR_a00600 associates with secreted effectors

    • Identify the position of NGR_a00600 within the T3SS machinery, if relevant

  • Functional characterization:

    • Assess whether NGR_a00600 is required for secretion of specific Nops

    • Determine if NGR_a00600 itself is secreted through the T3SS

    • Evaluate the role of NGR_a00600 in T3SS assembly or regulation

  • Host response studies:

    • Compare plant responses to wild-type and NGR_a00600 mutant strains

    • Analyze whether NGR_a00600 affects T3SS-dependent host range restriction

    • Investigate if NGR_a00600 influences T3SS-mediated suppression of plant defense responses

Low abundance of secreted proteins in NGR234 culture supernatants presents a significant challenge , necessitating sensitive proteomics approaches similar to those used for identifying other Nops. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis comparing wild-type and secretion system mutants has proven effective for this purpose .

How does NGR_a00600 compare to homologous proteins in other Rhizobium strains, and what does this reveal about evolutionary adaptation?

Comparative analysis of NGR_a00600 with homologs in other Rhizobium strains provides insights into evolutionary adaptation and host specificity:

  • Sequence homology patterns:
    While specific homology values for NGR_a00600 would require direct sequence comparison, other symbiotic-related genes in Rhizobium sp. NGR234 and R. leguminosarum Norway show varying degrees of conservation. Genes involved in Nod factor synthesis (nodABC, nodEFIJLMN) and nitrogen fixation (nifABDEHKN) typically show lower homology (69-82%), while housekeeping genes exhibit stronger conservation (93-99%) . This pattern suggests different evolutionary pressures on symbiotic versus core cellular functions.

  • Structural conservation:
    Even with sequence divergence, functional domains in translocation proteins may maintain structural conservation. Key residues involved in membrane interaction, substrate binding, or energy coupling would be expected to show higher conservation than variable regions that might influence host specificity.

  • Host range correlation:
    The exceptional host range of NGR234 (>120 legume genera) contrasts with more restricted host ranges of other Rhizobium strains . For example, Rhizobium sp. Chiba-1 forms nodules with Lotus burttii but not with Lotus japonicus Gifu . Analyzing differences in translocation proteins between these strains could reveal determinants of host specificity.

  • Horizontal gene transfer:
    The introduction of symbiotic genes from one Rhizobium species to another can alter host specificity. For instance, transferring nodH, nodEF, and nodQ genes from R. meliloti to R. leguminosarum changed its host preference . Similar horizontal transfer events may have shaped the evolution of NGR_a00600 and related translocation proteins.

  • Experimental approaches:

    • Phylogenetic analysis of NGR_a00600 homologs across rhizobial species

    • Functional complementation studies with homologs from different strains

    • Domain swapping experiments to identify host-specificity determinants

    • Correlation of sequence variations with documented host ranges

Understanding the evolutionary history of NGR_a00600 could provide insights into how rhizobial strains adapt to different host plants and potentially guide efforts to engineer strains with enhanced symbiotic capabilities.

What are the most effective techniques for detecting protein-protein interactions involving NGR_a00600?

Detecting protein-protein interactions involving NGR_a00600 requires selecting appropriate methods based on the research question and technical constraints:

TechniqueAdvantagesLimitationsConsiderations for NGR_a00600
Co-immunoprecipitationDetects interactions in near-native conditionsRequires specific antibodiesMay need crosslinking if interactions are transient
Bacterial two-hybridSystematic screening for interactorsMay give false positives/negativesCan test against genomic libraries from NGR234
Pull-down assaysControls for specificity with recombinant proteinsIn vitro conditions may not reflect in vivo realityUseful for confirming direct interactions
FRET/BRETMonitors interactions in living cellsRequires fluorescent/luminescent tagsCan reveal spatial and temporal dynamics
Surface plasmon resonanceProvides kinetic and affinity dataRequires purified proteinsValuable for quantitative binding parameters
Crosslinking mass spectrometryCaptures transient interactionsComplex data analysisCan map interaction interfaces at amino acid resolution

For NGR_a00600, a probable translocation protein, consider these methodological approaches:

  • In vivo proximity labeling:

    • BioID or APEX2 fusions to NGR_a00600 to label proximal proteins

    • Allows identification of the broader interaction network

    • Can capture transient interactions in the native environment

  • Split reporter systems:

    • Split-GFP or split-luciferase fusions to candidate interactors

    • Enables visualization or quantification of interactions in living cells

    • Can monitor interaction dynamics during symbiotic processes

  • Co-expression analysis:

    • Identify genes co-regulated with NGR_a00600 under symbiotic conditions

    • May reveal functional associations beyond direct physical interactions

    • Complementary to physical interaction methods

  • Structural approaches:

    • Cryo-EM analysis of NGR_a00600-containing complexes

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to map interaction surfaces

    • NMR studies for smaller interaction domains

When investigating membrane-associated proteins like NGR_a00600, standard interaction methods may require modification to accommodate membrane components or detergents, making techniques like membrane yeast two-hybrid or nanodiscs particularly valuable.

What bioinformatic approaches can predict the structure and function of NGR_a00600?

Bioinformatic approaches provide valuable insights into protein structure and function, particularly when experimental data is limited:

  • Sequence-based predictions:

    • Homology detection using PSI-BLAST, HHpred, or HMMER

    • Multiple sequence alignment with MUSCLE, CLUSTAL Omega, or T-Coffee

    • Secondary structure prediction via PSIPRED or JPred

    • Transmembrane topology prediction using TMHMM, TOPCONS, or Phobius

    • Functional domain identification through InterPro, Pfam, or SMART

  • Structure prediction:

    • Template-based modeling with SWISS-MODEL or I-TASSER

    • Deep learning approaches like AlphaFold2 or RoseTTAFold

    • Ab initio modeling for novel fold regions

    • Quality assessment using MolProbity or QMEAN

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to explore conformational flexibility

  • Functional inference:

    • Gene neighborhood analysis to identify functional associations

    • Co-evolution analysis to predict interaction partners or functional residues

    • Binding site prediction through SiteMap, CASTp, or FTMap

    • Evolutionary conservation mapping using ConSurf

    • Integrative functional prediction with STRING or InterologFinder

  • Comparative genomics:

    • Identification of orthologs across rhizobial species

    • Synteny analysis to examine genomic context conservation

    • Phylogenetic profiling to associate with specific symbiotic traits

    • Analysis of selection pressure (dN/dS ratios) to identify functionally important regions

For NGR_a00600 specifically, which is a probable translocation protein from Rhizobium sp. NGR234, these approaches could help predict its position within secretion systems, potential substrates, and mechanistic details of its translocation function. Integrating multiple bioinformatic methods provides more robust predictions than any single approach.

How can researchers effectively study the role of NGR_a00600 in plant-microbe interactions?

Investigating the role of NGR_a00600 in plant-microbe interactions requires a comprehensive approach combining molecular, cellular, and physiological techniques:

  • Genetic manipulation strategies:

    • Generate precise NGR_a00600 knockout mutants using CRISPR-Cas or homologous recombination

    • Create complementation strains with wild-type or modified versions

    • Develop conditional expression systems to study temporal requirements

    • Engineer reporter fusions to monitor expression during symbiosis

  • Plant inoculation experiments:

    • Compare nodulation efficiency between wild-type and mutant strains

    • Test multiple host plant species to assess host range effects

    • Measure nitrogen fixation capacity using acetylene reduction assays

    • Analyze nodule development through microscopy and molecular markers

  • Cellular and molecular analyses:

    • Track bacterial invasion using fluorescently labeled strains

    • Examine nodule ultrastructure via electron microscopy

    • Analyze gene expression changes in both symbiotic partners

    • Isolate bacteroids to assess differentiation status

  • Comparative approaches:

    • Test NGR_a00600 function in different rhizobial backgrounds

    • Compare effects across diverse host plants

    • Analyze function in the context of different secretion system mutants

    • Evaluate homolog function from strains with different host specificities

A particularly informative approach is the nodule complementation assay, where co-inoculation experiments assess potential complementation of deficient phenotypes. For example, similar methodologies have been used to study nodulation factor-deficient phenotypes in M. loti ΔnodAC mutants . By mixing cultures of the mutant strain carrying fluorescent markers (e.g., GFP) with test strains carrying different markers (e.g., DsRed), researchers can visualize and quantify the contribution of each strain to nodule formation.

How can studying NGR_a00600 contribute to improving nitrogen fixation in agriculture?

Understanding NGR_a00600 and its role in Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 could contribute to agricultural applications in several meaningful ways:

  • Host range engineering:
    If NGR_a00600 influences the exceptionally broad host range of NGR234 (>120 legume genera) , manipulating this protein could potentially:

    • Extend nitrogen fixation benefits to additional crop species

    • Improve nodulation efficiency in suboptimal soil conditions

    • Develop more broadly applicable biofertilizers

    • Reduce reliance on chemical nitrogen fertilizers

  • Enhancing symbiotic efficiency:
    Optimizing protein translocation mechanisms could lead to:

    • Faster establishment of symbiosis

    • Improved nitrogen fixation rates

    • Better tolerance to environmental stresses

    • More efficient nutrient exchange between partners

  • Methodological approaches:

    • Directed evolution of NGR_a00600 to select for enhanced function

    • Precise genetic engineering using CRISPR-Cas systems

    • Field testing of modified strains under diverse agricultural conditions

    • Integration with other agricultural practices like crop rotation

  • Application strategies:

    • Development of specialized inoculants for different crop systems

    • Formulation improvements to enhance bacterial survival in field conditions

    • Seed coating technologies for efficient delivery

    • Co-inoculation with complementary microbial strains

The unique attributes of NGR234, including its diverse secretion systems , make it an excellent model for understanding and improving symbiotic nitrogen fixation. By elucidating the role of translocation proteins like NGR_a00600 in this process, researchers can develop more effective strategies for reducing fertilizer inputs while maintaining or improving crop yields, contributing to more sustainable agricultural systems.

What emerging technologies could advance our understanding of NGR_a00600 function?

Several cutting-edge technologies hold promise for elucidating the function of proteins like NGR_a00600:

  • Advanced structural biology approaches:

    • Cryo-electron microscopy for high-resolution structures without crystallization

    • Integrative structural biology combining multiple data types

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to map conformational dynamics

    • Solid-state NMR for membrane-associated proteins

    • Time-resolved structural studies to capture dynamic processes

  • Single-molecule techniques:

    • Single-molecule FRET to observe conformational changes

    • Optical tweezers to measure forces in translocation events

    • High-speed AFM to visualize protein dynamics in real-time

    • Nanopore recordings to study translocation events electrically

    • Super-resolution microscopy to track proteins in living cells

  • Multi-omics integration:

    • Proteogenomics to correlate genetic variations with protein abundance

    • Metabolomics to link translocation function with cellular physiology

    • Transcriptomics to identify co-regulated gene networks

    • Interactomics to map comprehensive protein interaction networks

    • Systems biology modeling to integrate diverse data types

  • AI and computational approaches:

    • AlphaFold2 and similar tools for accurate protein structure prediction

    • Molecular dynamics simulations with enhanced sampling techniques

    • Machine learning for pattern recognition in complex datasets

    • Network analysis to place NGR_a00600 in functional context

    • Automated hypothesis generation and experimental design

  • Advanced genetic tools:

    • Genome-wide CRISPR screens to identify genetic interactions

    • Base editing for precise genetic modifications without double-strand breaks

    • Optogenetic control of protein function with spatial and temporal precision

    • Synthetic biology approaches to reconstruct minimal translocation systems

    • In vivo biosensors to monitor protein activity in real-time

These technologies, particularly when used in combination, can provide unprecedented insights into the molecular mechanisms of protein translocation, helping to elucidate the specific role of NGR_a00600 in Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234.

How can researchers integrate structural information with functional studies of NGR_a00600?

Integrating structural information with functional studies creates a powerful approach to understanding proteins like NGR_a00600:

  • Structure-guided mutagenesis:

    • Identify conserved residues through structural analysis

    • Design targeted mutations of functional regions

    • Create systematic alanine scanning libraries

    • Develop truncation constructs based on domain boundaries

    • Test effects on translocation function in vivo and in vitro

  • Structure-function correlation:

    • Map interaction sites identified in functional studies onto structural models

    • Correlate evolutionary conservation with structural features

    • Identify potential conformational changes linked to function

    • Compare with structural homologs of known function

    • Develop structure-based hypotheses for testing

  • Methodological approaches:

    • Combine computational modeling with experimental validation

    • Use structural information to design better protein purification strategies

    • Develop structure-based biosensors to monitor conformational changes

    • Engineer protein variants with altered specificity based on structural insights

    • Design domain-swapping experiments guided by structural domains

  • Integration strategies:

    • Establish interdisciplinary collaborations between structural biologists and functional biologists

    • Implement iterative cycles of prediction and experimental validation

    • Develop integrated databases of structural and functional information

    • Use machine learning to identify patterns linking structure to function

    • Combine diverse structural methods to obtain complementary information

For membrane-associated proteins like NGR_a00600, understanding how structural features facilitate interaction with lipid bilayers is particularly important. Molecular dynamics simulations can provide insights into membrane interactions that are difficult to capture experimentally. Similarly, identifying regions that undergo conformational changes during the translocation cycle can guide the design of experiments to trap the protein in different functional states.

What are the key unresolved questions about NGR_a00600 that warrant further investigation?

Despite advances in understanding Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 and its secretion systems, several critical questions about NGR_a00600 remain unresolved:

  • Molecular mechanism:

    • What is the precise molecular function of NGR_a00600 in protein translocation?

    • Does it form part of a translocation channel, act as a chaperone, or serve another role?

    • What energetic requirements drive NGR_a00600-mediated translocation?

    • How does its mechanism compare to other known translocation systems?

  • Structural organization:

    • What is the three-dimensional structure of NGR_a00600?

    • How does it interact with membranes and other components of secretion machinery?

    • What conformational changes occur during the translocation cycle?

    • Are there oligomeric states critical for function?

  • Biological role:

    • Which proteins are translocated through NGR_a00600-dependent pathways?

    • How does it contribute to the exceptional host range of NGR234?

    • What regulatory mechanisms control NGR_a00600 expression and activity?

    • How does it coordinate with other secretion systems in NGR234?

  • Evolutionary aspects:

    • How conserved is NGR_a00600 across rhizobial species?

    • Did horizontal gene transfer contribute to its acquisition?

    • How does sequence variation correlate with host specificity?

    • What selective pressures have shaped its evolution?

Addressing these questions will require integrative approaches combining structural biology, biochemistry, genetics, and systems biology. The answers will not only advance our understanding of this specific protein but also contribute to broader knowledge of protein translocation mechanisms and plant-microbe interactions.

How can researchers build upon current knowledge to develop applications based on NGR_a00600?

Building on current knowledge of NGR_a00600 and related translocation systems in Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 opens several avenues for practical applications:

  • Agricultural biotechnology:

    • Development of engineered rhizobial strains with optimized translocation systems

    • Creation of synthetic nitrogen-fixing associations with non-legume crops

    • Design of biofertilizers with enhanced performance under stress conditions

    • Improvement of nutrient use efficiency in agricultural systems

  • Protein production technology:

    • Engineering of novel secretion systems for recombinant protein production

    • Development of bacterial protein delivery systems for agricultural applications

    • Creation of cell-free protein synthesis systems incorporating translocation machineries

    • Design of controlled release mechanisms for bioactive compounds

  • Research tools:

    • Development of biosensors based on translocation events

    • Creation of model systems for studying membrane protein insertion

    • Design of experimental platforms for high-throughput screening of plant-microbe interactions

    • Establishment of synthetic biology toolkits for bacterial secretion

  • Methodological frameworks:

    • Interdisciplinary research teams combining expertise in structural biology, biochemistry, genetics, and systems biology

    • Integration of computational modeling with experimental validation

    • Development of standardized assays for translocation function

    • Establishment of databases integrating structural and functional information

Progress in these areas will depend on continued basic research into the fundamental mechanisms of protein translocation, combined with applied approaches aimed at harnessing these mechanisms for specific purposes. The exceptional properties of Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234, particularly its broad host range , make it an especially valuable model system for developing applications with wide agricultural relevance.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.