KEGG: rhi:NGR_a00600
Recombinant Rhizobium sp. Probable Translocation Protein Y4yM (NGR_a00600) is a full-length protein (91 amino acids) from Sinorhizobium fredii, also known as Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234. As a probable translocation protein, NGR_a00600 likely plays a role in protein secretion or transport across bacterial membranes. This protein is particularly significant because it originates from NGR234, a unique alphaproteobacterium that forms nitrogen-fixing nodules with more legume species than any other known microsymbiont . The strain's exceptional symbiotic versatility makes its translocation proteins of special interest for understanding plant-microbe interactions. NGR234 possesses an extraordinary number of secretion systems compared to most known bacteria, with 132 genes and proteins linked to secretory processes , suggesting a complex and sophisticated protein translocation machinery.
Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 possesses an unusually diverse array of secretion systems. The strain contains general and export pathways, a twin arginine translocase secretion system, six type I transporter genes, one functional and one putative type III system, three type IV attachment systems, and two putative type IV conjugation pili . Notably, Type V and VI transporters were not identified in NGR234. As a probable translocation protein, NGR_a00600 could potentially function within any of these systems, though based on its classification, it may be associated with the Type III Secretion System (TTSS). The TTSS in NGR234 is known to be functional and delivers proteins called Nodulation Outer Proteins (Nops) to the exterior of the cell . Understanding the specific secretion system association of NGR_a00600 would require experimental investigation, potentially through mutational analyses and protein interaction studies.
The recombinant NGR_a00600 protein can be expressed in E. coli expression systems, as demonstrated by commercial production of His-tagged versions of the full-length protein (1-91 amino acids) . For laboratory expression, researchers typically use vectors containing strong promoters suitable for bacterial expression (such as T7 or tac promoters) with affinity tags to facilitate purification. The expression protocol would involve transformation of the construct into an appropriate E. coli strain (commonly BL21(DE3) or derivatives), followed by culture growth, induction of protein expression, and cell harvesting.
For purification, a step-wise approach is recommended:
Cell lysis using mechanical disruption or chemical methods
Initial capture using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged versions
Intermediate purification via ion exchange chromatography
Polishing via size exclusion chromatography
Quality assessment through SDS-PAGE, Western blotting, and mass spectrometry
Buffer composition is critical, typically including pH stabilization (7.0-8.0), moderate salt concentration (150-300 mM NaCl), and potentially stabilizing agents like glycerol (5-10%). As a probable membrane-associated protein, detergents may be necessary to maintain solubility throughout the purification process.
The exceptional host range of Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234, which can nodulate more than 120 genera of legumes and even the non-legume Parasponia, depends on complex signal exchange mechanisms . As a probable translocation protein, NGR_a00600 may contribute to this process by facilitating the secretion of symbiotic factors that influence host specificity. The genome of NGR234 contains numerous genes encoding secretory proteins that likely participate in the molecular dialogue between the bacterium and its host plants .
Many bacterial proteins secreted through the Type III secretion system function as effectors that can either promote or inhibit nodulation, depending on the host plant. If NGR_a00600 is involved in this system, it could influence host range determination. Comparative studies of symbiotic-related genes between different Rhizobium strains have shown considerable variation, with homology as low as 69-82% for some genes involved in Nod factor synthesis and nitrogen fixation . This variability underscores the importance of strain-specific translocation mechanisms in establishing successful symbiosis.
Investigating the translocation function of NGR_a00600 requires a multi-faceted experimental approach:
Genetic manipulation studies:
Generate knockout mutants of NGR_a00600 in Rhizobium sp. NGR234
Assess phenotypic changes in secretion profiles and symbiotic capabilities
Create complementation strains to verify observed phenotypes
Develop reporter gene fusions to monitor expression under different conditions
Protein localization experiments:
Immunogold electron microscopy to visualize protein location within bacterial cells
Subcellular fractionation followed by Western blot analysis
Fluorescent protein fusions to track localization in living cells
Protease accessibility assays to determine membrane topology
Protein-protein interaction analyses:
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify interaction partners
Bacterial two-hybrid screening against genomic libraries
Pull-down assays using purified recombinant NGR_a00600
Cross-linking experiments to capture transient interactions
Functional reconstitution:
In vitro translocation assays using purified components
Liposome-based systems to study membrane interactions
Complementation assays in different secretion system mutants
A proteomics approach comparing secreted proteins between wild-type NGR234 and secretion system mutants can be particularly informative, as demonstrated by previous studies on Nops proteins . This method can help overcome the challenge of detecting low-abundance secreted proteins by employing two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and comparative analysis.
Optimizing expression conditions for NGR_a00600 to maintain its native structure requires systematic evaluation of multiple parameters:
| Parameter | Options to Test | Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Expression host | E. coli BL21(DE3), Rosetta, Arctic Express, Rhizobium strains | Select based on codon usage, folding requirements |
| Growth temperature | 37°C, 30°C, 25°C, 18°C, 16°C | Lower temperatures often improve folding |
| Induction method | IPTG concentration (0.01-1.0 mM), auto-induction | Slower induction may improve folding |
| Media composition | LB, TB, 2xYT, minimal media, supplementation | Rich media for high yield, minimal for labeled protein |
| Co-expression factors | Chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK/J/GrpE), rare tRNAs | May improve folding of difficult proteins |
| Fusion partners | His-tag, MBP, GST, SUMO, Thioredoxin | Solubility enhancement and purification strategy |
When working with translocation proteins like NGR_a00600, which may contain membrane-interactive domains, special considerations include:
The addition of membrane-mimicking components during purification (detergents or amphipols)
Stabilizing agents in buffers (glycerol, arginine, specific ions)
Protection from oxidation by including reducing agents (DTT, TCEP)
Minimizing time between cell disruption and purification steps
For quality assessment, combine multiple techniques: circular dichroism to evaluate secondary structure, thermal shift assays for stability assessment, and activity assays if available. The structure and function of translocation proteins are intimately connected, so maintaining native conformation is essential for meaningful functional studies.
Resolving contradictory data in NGR_a00600 research requires systematic troubleshooting and experimental design considerations:
Evaluate experimental conditions:
Standardize growth conditions across experiments (media, temperature, growth phase)
Document all buffer compositions and experimental parameters meticulously
Develop positive and negative controls specific to each assay
Consider whether differences in protein preparation affect function
Validate reagents and strains:
Sequence-verify all constructs before use
Check for mutations in bacterial strains
Validate antibody specificity through appropriate controls
Ensure protein quality by multiple analytical methods
Consider context-dependent functions:
Test function under different physiological conditions
Evaluate activity in the presence of potential interaction partners
Assess function at different stages of the symbiotic process
Examine effects in multiple host plant species
Apply complementary techniques:
Use multiple independent methods to address the same question
Combine in vitro and in vivo approaches
Implement both genetic and biochemical strategies
Utilize structural insights to guide functional studies
Statistical analysis:
Determine appropriate sample sizes through power analysis
Apply rigorous statistical tests suitable for the data type
Consider biological versus technical replication
Implement blinding procedures when possible
In bacterial secretion systems, contradictory results often stem from the complex, context-dependent nature of protein translocation. By systematically varying conditions and combining multiple experimental approaches, researchers can develop more comprehensive models that reconcile apparently conflicting observations.
Protein translocation across membranes occurs through several distinct mechanisms, and understanding where NGR_a00600 fits within this landscape requires comparative analysis:
Channel-dependent translocation:
The Sec61/SecY system represents the canonical pathway, forming a hydrophilic, hourglass-shaped channel with a lateral gate toward surrounding lipids . This well-studied mechanism primarily handles unfolded proteins.
Membrane distortion mechanisms:
Recent studies reveal that some proteins cross membranes without requiring a continuous aqueous channel. The Hrd1 complex, which mediates retro-translocation of misfolded proteins from the ER lumen to the cytosol, contains multi-spanning proteins with aqueous cavities and lateral gates positioned in thinned membrane regions . This locally distorted lipid bilayer facilitates protein movement across the membrane barrier.
YidC-mediated insertion:
YidC in bacteria (and homologs Oxa1 in mitochondria, Alb3 in chloroplasts) mediate membrane protein insertion through a mechanism involving local membrane thinning. These proteins form structures with deep cytosolic cavities and openings toward the lipid environment . MD simulations show that the short length of transmembrane segments causes local membrane thinning and allows water molecules to penetrate deep into the membrane.
Tim22 complex mechanism:
The Tim22 complex inserts mitochondrial solute transporters without forming continuous hydrophilic channels. Instead, it creates a curved surface inside the membrane with charged residues positioned within normal membrane boundaries . Mutation of these amino acids abolishes Tim22 function.
NGR_a00600, as a probable translocation protein in Rhizobium sp. NGR234, could potentially function through any of these mechanisms. Detailed structural and functional studies would be needed to determine its specific mode of action. Given the diverse secretion systems present in NGR234 , it may employ mechanisms that combine elements from multiple known systems or represent a novel translocation strategy altogether.
Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 possesses a functional Type III secretion system (T3SS) that delivers proteins called Nodulation Outer Proteins (Nops) to the exterior of the cell . The relationship between NGR_a00600 and this system requires investigation through several approaches:
Genetic interaction studies:
Protein-protein interaction analyses:
Investigate direct interactions between NGR_a00600 and T3SS components
Determine if NGR_a00600 associates with secreted effectors
Identify the position of NGR_a00600 within the T3SS machinery, if relevant
Functional characterization:
Assess whether NGR_a00600 is required for secretion of specific Nops
Determine if NGR_a00600 itself is secreted through the T3SS
Evaluate the role of NGR_a00600 in T3SS assembly or regulation
Host response studies:
Compare plant responses to wild-type and NGR_a00600 mutant strains
Analyze whether NGR_a00600 affects T3SS-dependent host range restriction
Investigate if NGR_a00600 influences T3SS-mediated suppression of plant defense responses
Low abundance of secreted proteins in NGR234 culture supernatants presents a significant challenge , necessitating sensitive proteomics approaches similar to those used for identifying other Nops. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis comparing wild-type and secretion system mutants has proven effective for this purpose .
Comparative analysis of NGR_a00600 with homologs in other Rhizobium strains provides insights into evolutionary adaptation and host specificity:
Sequence homology patterns:
While specific homology values for NGR_a00600 would require direct sequence comparison, other symbiotic-related genes in Rhizobium sp. NGR234 and R. leguminosarum Norway show varying degrees of conservation. Genes involved in Nod factor synthesis (nodABC, nodEFIJLMN) and nitrogen fixation (nifABDEHKN) typically show lower homology (69-82%), while housekeeping genes exhibit stronger conservation (93-99%) . This pattern suggests different evolutionary pressures on symbiotic versus core cellular functions.
Structural conservation:
Even with sequence divergence, functional domains in translocation proteins may maintain structural conservation. Key residues involved in membrane interaction, substrate binding, or energy coupling would be expected to show higher conservation than variable regions that might influence host specificity.
Host range correlation:
The exceptional host range of NGR234 (>120 legume genera) contrasts with more restricted host ranges of other Rhizobium strains . For example, Rhizobium sp. Chiba-1 forms nodules with Lotus burttii but not with Lotus japonicus Gifu . Analyzing differences in translocation proteins between these strains could reveal determinants of host specificity.
Horizontal gene transfer:
The introduction of symbiotic genes from one Rhizobium species to another can alter host specificity. For instance, transferring nodH, nodEF, and nodQ genes from R. meliloti to R. leguminosarum changed its host preference . Similar horizontal transfer events may have shaped the evolution of NGR_a00600 and related translocation proteins.
Experimental approaches:
Phylogenetic analysis of NGR_a00600 homologs across rhizobial species
Functional complementation studies with homologs from different strains
Domain swapping experiments to identify host-specificity determinants
Correlation of sequence variations with documented host ranges
Understanding the evolutionary history of NGR_a00600 could provide insights into how rhizobial strains adapt to different host plants and potentially guide efforts to engineer strains with enhanced symbiotic capabilities.
Detecting protein-protein interactions involving NGR_a00600 requires selecting appropriate methods based on the research question and technical constraints:
| Technique | Advantages | Limitations | Considerations for NGR_a00600 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-immunoprecipitation | Detects interactions in near-native conditions | Requires specific antibodies | May need crosslinking if interactions are transient |
| Bacterial two-hybrid | Systematic screening for interactors | May give false positives/negatives | Can test against genomic libraries from NGR234 |
| Pull-down assays | Controls for specificity with recombinant proteins | In vitro conditions may not reflect in vivo reality | Useful for confirming direct interactions |
| FRET/BRET | Monitors interactions in living cells | Requires fluorescent/luminescent tags | Can reveal spatial and temporal dynamics |
| Surface plasmon resonance | Provides kinetic and affinity data | Requires purified proteins | Valuable for quantitative binding parameters |
| Crosslinking mass spectrometry | Captures transient interactions | Complex data analysis | Can map interaction interfaces at amino acid resolution |
For NGR_a00600, a probable translocation protein, consider these methodological approaches:
In vivo proximity labeling:
BioID or APEX2 fusions to NGR_a00600 to label proximal proteins
Allows identification of the broader interaction network
Can capture transient interactions in the native environment
Split reporter systems:
Split-GFP or split-luciferase fusions to candidate interactors
Enables visualization or quantification of interactions in living cells
Can monitor interaction dynamics during symbiotic processes
Co-expression analysis:
Identify genes co-regulated with NGR_a00600 under symbiotic conditions
May reveal functional associations beyond direct physical interactions
Complementary to physical interaction methods
Structural approaches:
Cryo-EM analysis of NGR_a00600-containing complexes
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to map interaction surfaces
NMR studies for smaller interaction domains
When investigating membrane-associated proteins like NGR_a00600, standard interaction methods may require modification to accommodate membrane components or detergents, making techniques like membrane yeast two-hybrid or nanodiscs particularly valuable.
Bioinformatic approaches provide valuable insights into protein structure and function, particularly when experimental data is limited:
Sequence-based predictions:
Homology detection using PSI-BLAST, HHpred, or HMMER
Multiple sequence alignment with MUSCLE, CLUSTAL Omega, or T-Coffee
Secondary structure prediction via PSIPRED or JPred
Transmembrane topology prediction using TMHMM, TOPCONS, or Phobius
Functional domain identification through InterPro, Pfam, or SMART
Structure prediction:
Template-based modeling with SWISS-MODEL or I-TASSER
Deep learning approaches like AlphaFold2 or RoseTTAFold
Ab initio modeling for novel fold regions
Quality assessment using MolProbity or QMEAN
Molecular dynamics simulations to explore conformational flexibility
Functional inference:
Gene neighborhood analysis to identify functional associations
Co-evolution analysis to predict interaction partners or functional residues
Binding site prediction through SiteMap, CASTp, or FTMap
Evolutionary conservation mapping using ConSurf
Integrative functional prediction with STRING or InterologFinder
Comparative genomics:
Identification of orthologs across rhizobial species
Synteny analysis to examine genomic context conservation
Phylogenetic profiling to associate with specific symbiotic traits
Analysis of selection pressure (dN/dS ratios) to identify functionally important regions
For NGR_a00600 specifically, which is a probable translocation protein from Rhizobium sp. NGR234, these approaches could help predict its position within secretion systems, potential substrates, and mechanistic details of its translocation function. Integrating multiple bioinformatic methods provides more robust predictions than any single approach.
Investigating the role of NGR_a00600 in plant-microbe interactions requires a comprehensive approach combining molecular, cellular, and physiological techniques:
Genetic manipulation strategies:
Generate precise NGR_a00600 knockout mutants using CRISPR-Cas or homologous recombination
Create complementation strains with wild-type or modified versions
Develop conditional expression systems to study temporal requirements
Engineer reporter fusions to monitor expression during symbiosis
Plant inoculation experiments:
Compare nodulation efficiency between wild-type and mutant strains
Test multiple host plant species to assess host range effects
Measure nitrogen fixation capacity using acetylene reduction assays
Analyze nodule development through microscopy and molecular markers
Cellular and molecular analyses:
Track bacterial invasion using fluorescently labeled strains
Examine nodule ultrastructure via electron microscopy
Analyze gene expression changes in both symbiotic partners
Isolate bacteroids to assess differentiation status
Comparative approaches:
Test NGR_a00600 function in different rhizobial backgrounds
Compare effects across diverse host plants
Analyze function in the context of different secretion system mutants
Evaluate homolog function from strains with different host specificities
A particularly informative approach is the nodule complementation assay, where co-inoculation experiments assess potential complementation of deficient phenotypes. For example, similar methodologies have been used to study nodulation factor-deficient phenotypes in M. loti ΔnodAC mutants . By mixing cultures of the mutant strain carrying fluorescent markers (e.g., GFP) with test strains carrying different markers (e.g., DsRed), researchers can visualize and quantify the contribution of each strain to nodule formation.
Understanding NGR_a00600 and its role in Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 could contribute to agricultural applications in several meaningful ways:
Host range engineering:
If NGR_a00600 influences the exceptionally broad host range of NGR234 (>120 legume genera) , manipulating this protein could potentially:
Extend nitrogen fixation benefits to additional crop species
Improve nodulation efficiency in suboptimal soil conditions
Develop more broadly applicable biofertilizers
Reduce reliance on chemical nitrogen fertilizers
Enhancing symbiotic efficiency:
Optimizing protein translocation mechanisms could lead to:
Faster establishment of symbiosis
Improved nitrogen fixation rates
Better tolerance to environmental stresses
More efficient nutrient exchange between partners
Methodological approaches:
Directed evolution of NGR_a00600 to select for enhanced function
Precise genetic engineering using CRISPR-Cas systems
Field testing of modified strains under diverse agricultural conditions
Integration with other agricultural practices like crop rotation
Application strategies:
Development of specialized inoculants for different crop systems
Formulation improvements to enhance bacterial survival in field conditions
Seed coating technologies for efficient delivery
Co-inoculation with complementary microbial strains
The unique attributes of NGR234, including its diverse secretion systems , make it an excellent model for understanding and improving symbiotic nitrogen fixation. By elucidating the role of translocation proteins like NGR_a00600 in this process, researchers can develop more effective strategies for reducing fertilizer inputs while maintaining or improving crop yields, contributing to more sustainable agricultural systems.
Several cutting-edge technologies hold promise for elucidating the function of proteins like NGR_a00600:
Advanced structural biology approaches:
Cryo-electron microscopy for high-resolution structures without crystallization
Integrative structural biology combining multiple data types
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to map conformational dynamics
Solid-state NMR for membrane-associated proteins
Time-resolved structural studies to capture dynamic processes
Single-molecule techniques:
Single-molecule FRET to observe conformational changes
Optical tweezers to measure forces in translocation events
High-speed AFM to visualize protein dynamics in real-time
Nanopore recordings to study translocation events electrically
Super-resolution microscopy to track proteins in living cells
Multi-omics integration:
Proteogenomics to correlate genetic variations with protein abundance
Metabolomics to link translocation function with cellular physiology
Transcriptomics to identify co-regulated gene networks
Interactomics to map comprehensive protein interaction networks
Systems biology modeling to integrate diverse data types
AI and computational approaches:
AlphaFold2 and similar tools for accurate protein structure prediction
Molecular dynamics simulations with enhanced sampling techniques
Machine learning for pattern recognition in complex datasets
Network analysis to place NGR_a00600 in functional context
Automated hypothesis generation and experimental design
Advanced genetic tools:
Genome-wide CRISPR screens to identify genetic interactions
Base editing for precise genetic modifications without double-strand breaks
Optogenetic control of protein function with spatial and temporal precision
Synthetic biology approaches to reconstruct minimal translocation systems
In vivo biosensors to monitor protein activity in real-time
These technologies, particularly when used in combination, can provide unprecedented insights into the molecular mechanisms of protein translocation, helping to elucidate the specific role of NGR_a00600 in Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234.
Integrating structural information with functional studies creates a powerful approach to understanding proteins like NGR_a00600:
Structure-guided mutagenesis:
Identify conserved residues through structural analysis
Design targeted mutations of functional regions
Create systematic alanine scanning libraries
Develop truncation constructs based on domain boundaries
Test effects on translocation function in vivo and in vitro
Structure-function correlation:
Map interaction sites identified in functional studies onto structural models
Correlate evolutionary conservation with structural features
Identify potential conformational changes linked to function
Compare with structural homologs of known function
Develop structure-based hypotheses for testing
Methodological approaches:
Combine computational modeling with experimental validation
Use structural information to design better protein purification strategies
Develop structure-based biosensors to monitor conformational changes
Engineer protein variants with altered specificity based on structural insights
Design domain-swapping experiments guided by structural domains
Integration strategies:
Establish interdisciplinary collaborations between structural biologists and functional biologists
Implement iterative cycles of prediction and experimental validation
Develop integrated databases of structural and functional information
Use machine learning to identify patterns linking structure to function
Combine diverse structural methods to obtain complementary information
For membrane-associated proteins like NGR_a00600, understanding how structural features facilitate interaction with lipid bilayers is particularly important. Molecular dynamics simulations can provide insights into membrane interactions that are difficult to capture experimentally. Similarly, identifying regions that undergo conformational changes during the translocation cycle can guide the design of experiments to trap the protein in different functional states.
Despite advances in understanding Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 and its secretion systems, several critical questions about NGR_a00600 remain unresolved:
Molecular mechanism:
What is the precise molecular function of NGR_a00600 in protein translocation?
Does it form part of a translocation channel, act as a chaperone, or serve another role?
What energetic requirements drive NGR_a00600-mediated translocation?
How does its mechanism compare to other known translocation systems?
Structural organization:
What is the three-dimensional structure of NGR_a00600?
How does it interact with membranes and other components of secretion machinery?
What conformational changes occur during the translocation cycle?
Are there oligomeric states critical for function?
Biological role:
Which proteins are translocated through NGR_a00600-dependent pathways?
How does it contribute to the exceptional host range of NGR234?
What regulatory mechanisms control NGR_a00600 expression and activity?
How does it coordinate with other secretion systems in NGR234?
Evolutionary aspects:
How conserved is NGR_a00600 across rhizobial species?
Did horizontal gene transfer contribute to its acquisition?
How does sequence variation correlate with host specificity?
What selective pressures have shaped its evolution?
Addressing these questions will require integrative approaches combining structural biology, biochemistry, genetics, and systems biology. The answers will not only advance our understanding of this specific protein but also contribute to broader knowledge of protein translocation mechanisms and plant-microbe interactions.
Building on current knowledge of NGR_a00600 and related translocation systems in Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 opens several avenues for practical applications:
Agricultural biotechnology:
Development of engineered rhizobial strains with optimized translocation systems
Creation of synthetic nitrogen-fixing associations with non-legume crops
Design of biofertilizers with enhanced performance under stress conditions
Improvement of nutrient use efficiency in agricultural systems
Protein production technology:
Engineering of novel secretion systems for recombinant protein production
Development of bacterial protein delivery systems for agricultural applications
Creation of cell-free protein synthesis systems incorporating translocation machineries
Design of controlled release mechanisms for bioactive compounds
Research tools:
Development of biosensors based on translocation events
Creation of model systems for studying membrane protein insertion
Design of experimental platforms for high-throughput screening of plant-microbe interactions
Establishment of synthetic biology toolkits for bacterial secretion
Methodological frameworks:
Interdisciplinary research teams combining expertise in structural biology, biochemistry, genetics, and systems biology
Integration of computational modeling with experimental validation
Development of standardized assays for translocation function
Establishment of databases integrating structural and functional information
Progress in these areas will depend on continued basic research into the fundamental mechanisms of protein translocation, combined with applied approaches aimed at harnessing these mechanisms for specific purposes. The exceptional properties of Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234, particularly its broad host range , make it an especially valuable model system for developing applications with wide agricultural relevance.