NGR_a00220 is located on the 536,165 bp symbiotic plasmid pNGR234a of Rhizobium sp. NGR234 . Key genomic features include:
The pNGR234a plasmid encodes genes critical for symbiosis but lacks essential functions, distinguishing it from the chromosome and megaplasmid pNGR234b, which host core metabolic and secretion genes .
Recombinant y4bH is marketed for functional studies, though its uncharacterized status limits current applications. Key research avenues include:
Functional Elucidation: Investigating its role in symbiosis, secretion, or environmental adaptation.
Structural Analysis: Mapping transmembrane domains or interactions via X-ray crystallography/NMR.
Comparative Genomics: Cross-species analysis with related Rhizobium proteins.
Commercial sources provide lyophilized or liquid formats, with pricing varying by quantity .
The NGR234 genome comprises three replicons, each with distinct roles:
The symbiotic plasmid’s streamlined gene set contrasts with the megaplasmid’s metabolic diversity, highlighting its specialized role in host adaptation .
KEGG: rhi:NGR_a00220
NGR_a00220 is an uncharacterized protein from Sinorhizobium fredii with a full protein length of 91 amino acids. Available recombinant versions include His-tagged variants expressed in E. coli expression systems . While complete structural characterization remains limited, the protein likely shares structural features with other symbiotic proteins from Rhizobium species. Researchers should approach this protein using structural prediction tools similar to those applied to other uncharacterized proteins, such as comparing predicted binding sites to libraries of candidate structures .
While specific data on NGR_a00220's relationship to other proteins is limited, it likely belongs to a family of proteins involved in the molecular dialogue between rhizobia and legumes. Related proteins such as Y4lO from Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 function as Type 3 (T3) effector proteins, potentially sharing similar regulatory mechanisms . Preliminary analysis suggests NGR_a00220 may participate in symbiotic interactions, possibly regulated by transcriptional activators like TtsI that control expression of other effector proteins in the Rhizobium genus .
E. coli expression systems have been successfully employed for recombinant production of NGR_a00220 with His-tags . When designing expression protocols, researchers should consider:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Recommended Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, cost-effective, rapid expression | Potential issues with protein folding, lack of post-translational modifications | IPTG induction at OD600 0.6-0.8, 16-18°C overnight expression |
| Insect cells | Better folding, some post-translational modifications | Higher cost, longer production time | Baculovirus expression, harvest 72h post-infection |
| Mammalian cells | Most authentic post-translational modifications | Highest cost, lowest yield | Transient transfection, harvest 48-72h post-transfection |
When purifying NGR_a00220, researchers should implement protocols similar to those used for other Rhizobium proteins, including immobilized metal affinity chromatography for His-tagged variants, followed by size exclusion chromatography to ensure monomeric preparation.
For uncharacterized proteins like NGR_a00220, a multi-faceted approach is recommended:
Structure-based function prediction: Compare the protein's predicted binding site to libraries containing thousands of candidate structures to identify potential functional similarities . This approach has successfully elucidated functions of other uncharacterized proteins like Tm1631 from Thermotoga maritima.
Molecular dynamics simulations: Construct models of NGR_a00220 with potential ligands and validate through molecular dynamics, calculating binding free energies to confirm model accuracy .
Genetic approaches: Generate knockout mutants (similar to the NGRΩ y4lO strain developed for Y4lO studies) to observe phenotypic changes in symbiotic interactions with various legume hosts .
Transcriptional analysis: Investigate promoter activity dependencies on transcriptional regulators like TtsI, which has been shown to regulate other symbiotic determinants in Rhizobium sp. .
Interactome mapping: Identify protein-protein interactions using yeast two-hybrid, co-immunoprecipitation, and pull-down assays to place NGR_a00220 within the cellular protein network .
Differentiation between NGR_a00220 and other uncharacterized proteins requires strategic comparative analysis:
Generate single and double mutants of NGR_a00220 and related genes (similar to the NGRΩ y4lO and NGRΩ nopLΩ y4lO mutants) .
Assess symbiotic phenotypes across multiple host legumes, documenting differences in nodulation efficiency, nitrogen fixation capacity, and ultrastructural characteristics of infected nodule cells .
Conduct complementation studies where mutant phenotypes are rescued by expressing NGR_a00220 or related proteins under control of their native promoters.
Perform detailed transcriptomic and proteomic analyses to identify differential gene/protein expression patterns in response to NGR_a00220 versus other proteins.
Use ultrastructural analysis to examine potential roles in symbiosome differentiation, as observed with Y4lO protein, where mutation led to abnormal formation of enlarged infection droplets in ineffective nodules .
Based on studies of similar proteins, NGR_a00220 likely participates in the complex molecular dialogue between rhizobia and legumes. This interaction involves multiple signaling molecules:
Plant signals: Flavonoids and non-flavonoid compounds in root exudates serve as chemoattractants and induce nod gene expression in rhizobia .
Bacterial responses: Rhizobia produce lipochito-oligosaccharide Nod factors, surface polysaccharides, and deploy secretion systems (Types I, III, and IV) to deliver effector proteins like NGR_a00220 .
Potential signaling role: NGR_a00220 may function similar to Y4lO, which mitigates senescence-inducing effects in nodules, suggesting it could be involved in maintaining symbiont viability within host cells .
Host specificity determination: Like other effector proteins, NGR_a00220 may influence host range by affecting the nodulation of certain legume hosts while having neutral or negative effects on others .
While specific data on NGR_a00220's role is limited, insights from related proteins suggest potential impacts on symbiosome differentiation:
Symbiosome membrane integrity: NGR_a00220 may help regulate the development of properly formed symbiosomes where single bacteroids are surrounded by individual symbiosome membranes, similar to Y4lO's function .
Prevention of premature senescence: The protein potentially inhibits nodule senescence pathways, as observed with Y4lO, where mutation caused nodules to rapidly turn greenish (indicating premature senescence) .
Infection droplet regulation: NGR_a00220 may prevent the formation of abnormally enlarged infection droplets, which have been observed in nodules induced by Y4lO mutants .
Synergistic effects with other effectors: Like Y4lO, which demonstrated synergistic effects with NopL in nitrogen-fixing nodules, NGR_a00220 may work cooperatively with other bacterial proteins to ensure proper nodule development .
To effectively study NGR_a00220's interactions with host plant proteins, researchers should employ multiple complementary techniques:
Yeast two-hybrid screening: Use NGR_a00220 as bait against cDNA libraries from relevant legume hosts to identify potential interacting partners.
Co-immunoprecipitation assays: Express tagged NGR_a00220 in bacterial or plant systems, then pull down and identify interacting proteins using mass spectrometry.
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC): Fuse NGR_a00220 and candidate interacting proteins to complementary fragments of fluorescent proteins to visualize interactions in planta.
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR): Quantitatively measure binding kinetics between purified NGR_a00220 and candidate plant proteins.
Protein arrays: Screen NGR_a00220 against arrays of plant proteins to identify novel interactions.
When examining potential enzymatic activities, researchers should consider that related YopJ-like proteins exhibit different substrate specificities. For example, Y4lO did not acetylate mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases (MKK6 and MKK1) that are typical substrates for some YopJ family members .
Based on successful approaches with related proteins, researchers should implement:
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM): Essential for ultrastructural analysis of infected nodule cells, allowing visualization of:
Confocal laser scanning microscopy: Using fluorescently tagged NGR_a00220 to track its localization during infection and nodule development.
Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM): Combining fluorescence and electron microscopy to precisely localize NGR_a00220 within ultrastructural contexts.
Live-cell imaging: To capture dynamic processes during infection thread development and symbiosome formation in real-time.
Immunogold labeling: For precise localization of NGR_a00220 at the ultrastructural level, particularly at the symbiosome membrane interface.
While direct comparative data is limited, several inferences can be made:
Structural similarities: Both belong to the family of effector proteins in Rhizobium sp., though Y4lO shows sequence similarities specifically to the YopJ effector family from pathogenic bacteria . NGR_a00220's structural classification requires further investigation.
Expression regulation: Y4lO expression depends on the transcriptional activator TtsI . NGR_a00220 may be regulated by similar transcriptional mechanisms if it is also delivered through a secretion system.
Host impact: Y4lO is known to affect symbiosome differentiation, with mutations causing formation of abnormal infection droplets and premature nodule senescence . NGR_a00220 may have similar or complementary functions in the symbiotic relationship.
Phylogenetic relationship: Y4lO is most closely related to XopJ within the YopJ family . NGR_a00220's phylogenetic placement requires determination through targeted sequence analysis.
Enzymatic activity: Y4lO does not acetylate typical substrates of YopJ family members (MKK6 and MKK1) , suggesting functional divergence within this protein family. NGR_a00220's enzymatic activities remain to be characterized.
Researchers can leverage knowledge from various characterized rhizobial proteins:
Secretion system effectors: NGR_a00220 may function as part of the Type I, III, or IV secretion systems identified in rhizobia .
Signal transduction modulators: Like Y4lO, NGR_a00220 may modulate plant defense responses or developmental pathways during nodulation .
Symbiosome development factors: The protein may contribute to proper symbiosome formation and prevention of premature senescence, similar to Y4lO .
Host-specificity determinants: NGR_a00220 could influence host range by affecting nodulation outcomes on specific legume hosts, as observed with other symbiotic determinants .
Potential cooperativity: Consider possible synergistic effects between NGR_a00220 and other effectors (like the relationship between Y4lO and NopL) .
For effective high-throughput screening, researchers should consider:
Protein microarray development: Design custom arrays featuring:
Plant defense signaling proteins
Nodule-specific proteins
Cell cycle regulators
Membrane trafficking components
Substrate profiling techniques:
Activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) to identify potential enzymatic targets
Nucleotide binding assays if NGR_a00220 interacts with DNA or RNA
Phosphorylation/dephosphorylation assays to test potential kinase or phosphatase activity
Library screening optimization:
Use bacterial two-hybrid systems for prokaryotic partner screening
Employ split-ubiquitin yeast two-hybrid for membrane protein interactions
Implement phage display with plant protein libraries
Bioinformatic prediction refinement:
When facing contradictory results across host plants, consider these approaches:
Comprehensive host range analysis:
Test multiple accessions/cultivars of each legume species
Include phylogenetically diverse legume hosts to identify patterns
Document detailed phenotypic responses using standardized metrics
Environmental variable control:
Systematically test effects of temperature, pH, and nutrient availability
Evaluate impacts of microbial community composition
Consider plant growth stage effects on NGR_a00220 function
Molecular dissection strategies:
Create domain-specific mutations to identify host-specific functional regions
Perform domain swapping with related proteins showing different host specificities
Use time-course transcriptomics to capture temporal dynamics of responses
Methodological standardization:
Develop consistent protocols for phenotypic assessment
Establish quantitative metrics for nodulation efficiency
Implement statistical approaches that account for biological variability
Multi-omics integration:
Combine transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data
Apply network analysis to identify host-specific pathways affected
Develop predictive models that account for host-specific variables
Future research should focus on these promising areas:
Host range expansion engineering:
Identify modifications to NGR_a00220 that could expand compatible host range
Develop synthetic biology approaches to optimize symbiotic efficiency
Create variant libraries screened for enhanced nitrogen fixation capability
Stress resistance improvement:
Investigate NGR_a00220's potential roles in symbiosis maintenance under drought, salinity, or temperature stress
Identify variants with enhanced performance in challenging agricultural conditions
Develop inoculant formulations optimized for stressed environments
Cross-kingdom signaling exploration:
Characterize NGR_a00220's potential impacts on root microbiome composition
Investigate effects on plant systemic responses beyond nodulation
Explore potential applications in integrated pest management through induced systemic resistance
Structure-guided design:
Develop atomic-resolution structures of NGR_a00220
Identify critical residues for host-specific functions
Design optimized variants through computational protein engineering
Novel methodological approaches with significant potential include:
Advanced imaging technologies:
Cryo-electron tomography for in situ visualization of NGR_a00220 during infection
Super-resolution microscopy to track protein dynamics during symbiosis
Label-free imaging techniques to observe native protein behavior
Single-cell approaches:
Single-cell transcriptomics of infected root cells at different developmental stages
Spatial transcriptomics to map gene expression changes in nodule tissues
Single-cell proteomics to capture cell-specific protein abundance changes
Systems biology integration:
Multi-scale modeling from molecular interactions to ecosystem impacts
Genome-scale metabolic models incorporating NGR_a00220 effects
Machine learning approaches to predict symbiotic outcomes from genomic data
CRISPR-based technologies:
Base editing for precise manipulation of NGR_a00220 sequence
CRISPRi/CRISPRa for temporal control of expression
CRISPR screens in both bacterial and plant systems to identify genetic interactions
Synthetic biology implementations:
Minimal synthetic systems reconstituting NGR_a00220 function
Orthogonal expression systems for controlled deployment in field conditions
Biosensor development for real-time monitoring of protein activity