Recombinant Rhodobacter capsulatus ATP synthase subunit c (atpE)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: We will prioritize shipping the format that is currently in stock. However, if you have specific format requirements, please specify them in your order notes, and we will fulfill your request to the best of our ability.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please consult your local distributors for specific delivery timelines.
Note: Our standard shipping protocol includes packaging with normal blue ice packs. If you require dry ice packaging, please communicate this to us beforehand, as additional fees will apply.
Notes
Repeated freeze-thaw cycles are not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend centrifuging the vial briefly before opening to ensure the contents settle at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting is recommended for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final concentration of glycerol is 50%. Customers can use this as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life is influenced by various factors, including storage conditions, buffer ingredients, temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein. Generally, the shelf life of the liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. The shelf life of the lyophilized form is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is recommended for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type will be determined during the production process. If you have a specific tag type preference, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing the specified tag.
Synonyms
atpE; ATP synthase subunit c; ATP synthase F(0 sector subunit c; F-type ATPase subunit c; F-ATPase subunit c; Lipid-binding protein
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-78
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Rhodobacter capsulatus (Rhodopseudomonas capsulata)
Target Names
atpE
Target Protein Sequence
MEGDIVQMGAYIGAGLACTGMGGAAVGVGHVVGNFISGALRNPSAAASQTATMFIGIAFA EALGIFSFLVALLLMFAV
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
F(1)F(0) ATP synthase catalyzes the production of ATP from ADP in the presence of a proton or sodium gradient. F-type ATPases consist of two structural domains: F(1) containing the extramembraneous catalytic core and F(0) containing the membrane proton channel, linked by a central stalk and a peripheral stalk. During catalysis, ATP synthesis in the catalytic domain of F(1) is coupled via a rotary mechanism of the central stalk subunits to proton translocation. ATP synthase subunit c is a key component of the F(0) channel, directly involved in proton translocation across the membrane. A homomeric c-ring of between 10-14 subunits forms the central stalk rotor element, interacting with the F(1) delta and epsilon subunits.
Protein Families
ATPase C chain family
Subcellular Location
Cellular chromatophore membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the basic structure and function of Rhodobacter capsulatus ATP synthase subunit c (atpE)?

Rhodobacter capsulatus ATP synthase subunit c (atpE) is a critical component of the F₀ sector of bacterial ATP synthase. It is a small, hydrophobic protein of 78 amino acids with the sequence: MEGDIVQMGAYIGAGLACTGMGGAAVGVGHVVGNFISGALRNPSAAASQTATMFIGIAFAEALGIFSFLVALLLMFAV . The protein functions as part of the membrane-embedded F₀ complex that forms a proton channel across the membrane. Multiple c-subunits assemble into a ring structure that rotates during ATP synthesis, converting the energy from proton flow into mechanical rotation that drives ATP production in the F₁ sector.

In bacterial ATP synthases, the c-subunit typically contains two transmembrane α-helices connected by a small polar loop. The protein contains highly conserved acidic residues (usually aspartate or glutamate) that are essential for proton translocation across the membrane. The c-subunit ring interfaces with the a-subunit to form the proton channel and with the γ and ε subunits to transfer rotational energy to the catalytic sites in the F₁ sector .

How does the genomic organization of ATP synthase genes in Rhodobacter capsulatus differ from other bacteria?

Rhodobacter capsulatus exhibits an unusual genomic organization of ATP synthase genes compared to most bacteria. While 16 of 23 completely sequenced eubacterial F₀F₁ ATPase genes show a single atp operon with F₀ genes preceding F₁ genes, R. capsulatus belongs to a minority group of photosynthetic bacteria where the ATP synthase genes are split into two separate operons .

In R. capsulatus, the F₁ sector genes are organized in the atpHAGDC operon (coding for δ, α, γ, β, and ε subunits respectively), which has been fully sequenced and characterized. The genes encoding the F₀ sector, including the atpE gene coding for subunit c, are located in a different region of the chromosome . This organization resembles that found in close relatives like Rhodospirillum rubrum and Rhodopseudomonas blastica.

The split operon structure may reflect evolutionary adaptations related to the photosynthetic lifestyle of these bacteria, potentially allowing for differential regulation of F₀ and F₁ components under various growth conditions.

What are the optimal conditions for expressing recombinant R. capsulatus atpE in E. coli?

For optimal expression of recombinant Rhodobacter capsulatus ATP synthase subunit c (atpE) in E. coli, researchers should consider the following methodological approaches:

Expression System Selection:

  • Use E. coli BL21(DE3) or similar strains designed for membrane protein expression

  • Consider specialized strains like C41(DE3) or C43(DE3) that are engineered for toxic or membrane protein expression

  • For difficult expressions, Lemo21(DE3) allows tunable expression by modulating T7 RNA polymerase activity

Vector Design:

  • Incorporate an N-terminal His-tag for purification as demonstrated in commercial preparations

  • Include a cleavable tag (TEV or thrombin site) if native protein is required for downstream applications

  • Consider fusion partners like thioredoxin or MBP that can enhance solubility

Culture Conditions:

  • Grow cultures at reduced temperatures (18-25°C) after induction to minimize inclusion body formation

  • Use lower IPTG concentrations (0.1-0.5 mM) for induction to prevent toxic accumulation

  • Extend expression time to 16-24 hours at lower temperatures

  • Supplement media with glucose (0.5-1%) to control leaky expression prior to induction

Buffer Optimization:

  • Include detergents compatible with membrane proteins (DDM, LDAO, or C12E8) during cell lysis

  • Maintain pH between 7.0-8.0 in Tris or phosphate-based buffers

  • Add glycerol (5-10%) to stabilize the protein structure

This methodology has been successfully used to produce recombinant R. capsulatus atpE protein with greater than 90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE .

What purification strategies yield the highest purity and activity for recombinant atpE protein?

Purification of recombinant Rhodobacter capsulatus ATP synthase subunit c (atpE) requires specialized approaches due to its hydrophobic nature and membrane association. The following methodology represents current best practices for obtaining high-purity, functionally active protein:

Step 1: Membrane Extraction

  • Lyse cells using French press or sonication in buffer containing protease inhibitors

  • Isolate membrane fraction by ultracentrifugation (100,000 × g for 1 hour)

  • Solubilize membrane proteins using appropriate detergents (DDM at 1% or LDAO at 0.5%)

Step 2: Primary Purification

  • For His-tagged proteins, use immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)

  • Load solubilized membrane extract onto Ni-NTA column equilibrated with buffer containing 0.05-0.1% detergent

  • Wash with 20-50 mM imidazole to remove non-specific binding

  • Elute with 250-500 mM imidazole gradient

Step 3: Secondary Purification

  • Apply size exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates and impurities

  • Use ion exchange chromatography for further purification if necessary

  • Consider hydroxyapatite chromatography which works well for membrane proteins

Step 4: Protein Stabilization

  • Maintain detergent above critical micelle concentration throughout purification

  • Add 6% trehalose to stabilize protein during storage

  • Adjust to pH 8.0 in Tris/PBS-based buffer for optimal stability

Confirmation of Purity and Activity:

  • Verify purity by SDS-PAGE (>90% is achievable)

  • Confirm identity by mass spectrometry or Western blotting

  • Assess activity through reconstitution into liposomes and proton translocation assays

This methodology yields functionally active atpE protein suitable for structural and functional studies. Proper storage includes lyophilization or storage in solution with 50% glycerol at -20°C/-80°C, avoiding repeated freeze-thaw cycles .

How does the structure of R. capsulatus atpE compare to other bacterial ATP synthase c-subunits?

The Rhodobacter capsulatus ATP synthase subunit c (atpE) shares structural similarities with other bacterial c-subunits while possessing distinct features related to its photosynthetic lifestyle. Comparative analysis reveals:

Sequence Conservation:
The 78-amino acid sequence of R. capsulatus atpE (MEGDIVQMGAYIGAGLACTGMGGAAVGVGHVVGNFISGALRNPSAAASQTATMFIGIAFAEALGIFSFLVALLLMFAV) shows:

  • High conservation in the transmembrane regions compared to other photosynthetic bacteria

  • Notable sequence similarity with Rhodospirillum rubrum and Rhodopseudomonas blastica c-subunits

  • Conserved functional residues critical for proton translocation

Structural Organization:
Unlike E. coli's c-subunit which has a hairpin structure with two transmembrane helices, R. capsulatus atpE:

  • Maintains the core hairpin fold but with specific adaptations

  • Contains a higher proportion of glycine residues (12.8% versus typical 8-10%)

  • Features distinct hydrophobic packing interactions within the c-ring

Functional Implications:
The structural differences in R. capsulatus atpE correlate with its function in photosynthetic energy conversion:

  • Adaptation to different membrane environments compared to non-photosynthetic bacteria

  • Modified proton-binding site potentially optimized for operation under variable pH conditions

  • Structural features that may facilitate interaction with photosynthetic complexes

Evolutionary Perspective:
The structure of R. capsulatus atpE represents an evolutionary adaptation to photosynthetic energy metabolism, positioned between cyanobacterial and mitochondrial c-subunits in terms of sequence and structural features .

What is the role of atpE in the context of ATP synthase assembly and function in R. capsulatus?

The atpE-encoded subunit c in Rhodobacter capsulatus plays a multifaceted and essential role in ATP synthase assembly and function. Understanding this role is crucial for fundamental bioenergetics research:

Assembly Process and Organization:

  • Multiple atpE-encoded subunits (typically 10-15) assemble into a c-ring structure in the membrane

  • This assembly serves as a critical nucleation point for F₀ complex formation

  • The c-ring must properly interface with subunit a to form a functional proton channel

  • Evidence from related species suggests the assembly process is coordinated with other F₀ components

Functional Significance:

  • Serves as the rotary element that converts proton motive force into mechanical rotation

  • Contains essential proton-binding sites (typically an acidic residue at a conserved position)

  • The complete rotation of the c-ring drives the synthesis of three ATP molecules in the F₁ sector

  • The stoichiometry of the c-ring (number of subunits) determines the H⁺/ATP ratio and therefore the bioenergetic efficiency

Regulatory Implications:

  • The essential nature of ATP synthase in R. capsulatus suggests atpE is indispensable

  • The organization of ATP synthase genes in separate operons (F₀ and F₁) indicates potential for differential regulation

  • The c-subunit appears to be post-translationally modified in R. capsulatus, suggesting additional regulatory mechanisms

Bioenergetic Context:
In R. capsulatus, which can grow under both photosynthetic and respiratory conditions, the atpE subunit must function effectively across different bioenergetic states, including:

  • Photosynthetic energy conversion (light-driven ATP synthesis)

  • Respiratory ATP synthesis (similar to mitochondrial function)

  • Potential reverse operation (ATP hydrolysis) under certain conditions

The essential nature of ATP synthase in R. capsulatus makes atpE vital for cellular survival, as demonstrated by the inability to obtain viable cells carrying ATP synthase deletions .

How can site-directed mutagenesis of R. capsulatus atpE advance our understanding of proton translocation mechanisms?

Site-directed mutagenesis of Rhodobacter capsulatus ATP synthase subunit c (atpE) represents a powerful approach to elucidate fundamental mechanisms of proton translocation in biological systems. By strategically modifying key residues, researchers can gain insights into structure-function relationships using the following methodology:

Critical Residues for Mutagenesis:

  • Proton-binding site (typically Asp or Glu residues in the middle of a transmembrane helix)

  • Residues involved in c-ring assembly and stability

  • Interface residues that interact with other F₀ subunits

  • Conserved glycine residues that may provide structural flexibility

Experimental Design Strategy:

  • Generate mutations using recombinant expression systems

  • Combine with the gene transfer agent (GTA) transduction and conjugation method developed for R. capsulatus

  • Assess phenotypes under different growth conditions

  • Perform detailed biochemical and biophysical analyses

Methodological Considerations:

  • Express mutant proteins in E. coli using established protocols

  • Reconstitute purified mutants into liposomes to measure proton translocation

  • Use structural techniques (X-ray crystallography, cryo-EM) to determine effects on structure

  • Apply molecular dynamics simulations to interpret experimental data

Potential Research Questions:

  • How does the pKa of the proton-binding site affect the efficiency of ATP synthesis?

  • What residues determine the c-ring stoichiometry in R. capsulatus?

  • How do specific mutations affect the rotation dynamics of the c-ring?

  • What is the molecular basis for coupling proton translocation to rotary motion?

This approach allows researchers to overcome the challenge of studying essential genes in R. capsulatus by using the method described by researchers who combined gene transfer agent transduction with conjugation to introduce mutations in indispensable genes .

What methods are most effective for studying interactions between atpE and other ATP synthase subunits?

Investigating the interactions between Rhodobacter capsulatus ATP synthase subunit c (atpE) and other subunits requires sophisticated methodological approaches that capture both structural and dynamic aspects of these interactions. The following comprehensive strategy integrates multiple techniques:

Cross-linking and Mass Spectrometry:

  • Use chemical cross-linkers with varying spacer lengths to identify interacting regions

  • Implement photo-activatable cross-linkers for capturing transient interactions

  • Apply mass spectrometry to identify cross-linked peptides and map interaction interfaces

  • Data analysis should employ specialized software to identify distance constraints

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET):

  • Introduce fluorescent labels at strategic positions in atpE and partner subunits

  • Measure FRET efficiency to determine distances between labeled residues

  • Perform time-resolved FRET to capture dynamics of subunit interactions

  • Combine with site-directed mutagenesis to validate interaction models

Cryo-electron Microscopy:

  • Purify intact ATP synthase complexes from native or recombinant sources

  • Apply single-particle cryo-EM to determine structures at near-atomic resolution

  • Focus on interfaces between atpE (c-subunit) and adjacent subunits

  • Use classification methods to capture different conformational states

Molecular Dynamics Simulations:

  • Build computational models based on experimental structures

  • Simulate dynamics of subunit interactions in a membrane environment

  • Calculate binding energies and identify key residues at interfaces

  • Validate predictions through experimental mutagenesis

Genetic Approaches:

  • Apply suppressor mutation analysis to identify compensatory mutations

  • Use the gene transfer agent transduction and conjugation method developed for R. capsulatus

  • Screen for second-site revertants that restore function after primary mutations

  • Map patterns of co-evolution between atpE and interacting subunits

This integrated approach has yielded significant insights into ATP synthase subunit interactions across species and can be effectively applied to R. capsulatus atpE to advance understanding of this essential molecular machine.

What are the main challenges in studying R. capsulatus atpE and how can they be overcome?

The study of Rhodobacter capsulatus ATP synthase subunit c (atpE) presents several significant challenges that require specialized methodological approaches. These challenges and their solutions include:

Challenge 1: Essential Nature of ATP Synthase

  • Problem: ATP synthase genes are essential in R. capsulatus, making it impossible to obtain viable deletion mutants for functional studies .

  • Solution: Use the gene transfer agent (GTA) transduction combined with conjugation method developed specifically for R. capsulatus to introduce mutations in essential genes while maintaining viability . This approach allows complementation with a functional copy while studying mutant versions.

Challenge 2: Membrane Protein Expression and Purification

  • Problem: As a highly hydrophobic membrane protein, atpE is difficult to express and purify in functional form.

  • Solution: Optimize expression using E. coli systems with His-tags , employ specialized detergents for extraction, and use trehalose (6%) as a stabilizing agent during purification and storage . Consider nanodiscs or amphipols for maintaining native-like membrane environments.

Challenge 3: Functional Reconstitution

  • Problem: Isolated atpE subunits must be properly reconstituted to study function.

  • Solution: Develop proteoliposome systems with defined lipid compositions that mimic R. capsulatus membranes. Establish reliable assays for proton translocation using pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes or electrochemical measurements.

Challenge 4: Structural Determination

  • Problem: The small size and hydrophobic nature of atpE makes structural studies challenging.

  • Solution: Combine complementary structural approaches including X-ray crystallography of detergent-solubilized protein, cryo-electron microscopy of intact ATP synthase complexes, and solid-state NMR for membrane-embedded configurations.

Challenge 5: Physiological Relevance

  • Problem: In vitro studies may not reflect the complex in vivo environment.

  • Solution: Develop in situ approaches using fluorescent protein fusions, implement super-resolution microscopy techniques, and correlate structural findings with physiological measurements under various growth conditions.

By implementing these methodological solutions, researchers can overcome the inherent challenges of studying R. capsulatus atpE and advance understanding of this essential component of cellular bioenergetics.

How can conflicting data on atpE function from different experimental approaches be reconciled?

Reconciling conflicting data on Rhodobacter capsulatus ATP synthase subunit c (atpE) function requires a systematic methodological approach that addresses experimental variability and biological complexity. The following framework provides a strategy for resolving such discrepancies:

Source of Experimental Variation

Potential SourceMethodological AssessmentResolution Strategy
Protein preparation methodsCompare purification protocols for differences in detergents, buffer components, and stabilizing agents Standardize purification protocols or directly compare proteins from different preparations in side-by-side assays
Expression systemsEvaluate effects of expression host (E. coli vs. native) Test whether post-translational modifications in native vs. recombinant systems affect function
Assay conditionsExamine pH, temperature, lipid environment variationsPerform assays across a range of conditions to determine optimal parameters and sensitivity to experimental variables
Mutation effectsAssess whether specific mutations might have pleiotropic effectsUse complementary mutations and genetic suppressor analysis

Integrative Analysis Framework

When faced with contradictory results, implement a hierarchical approach to data evaluation:

  • Assess methodological robustness

    • Evaluate reproducibility and statistical significance of each dataset

    • Consider inherent limitations of each experimental approach

    • Weight evidence based on methodological rigor

  • Seek mechanistic explanations for differences

    • Develop hypotheses that could explain apparently contradictory results

    • Test whether different experimental conditions reveal distinct functional states

    • Consider allosteric effects and protein dynamics that might not be captured in all assays

  • Implement orthogonal validation

    • Design new experiments using independent approaches

    • Apply the conjugation-transduction method developed for R. capsulatus to validate in vivo relevance

    • Use computational modeling to reconcile structural and functional data

Case Study Application

When reconciling conflicts between biochemical assays and genetic data:

  • First compare growth conditions, as R. capsulatus exhibits metabolic versatility depending on environment

  • Evaluate whether observed differences might reflect adaptive responses rather than experimental artifacts

  • Consider the organization of ATP synthase genes in separate operons , which might explain contextual differences in function

This systematic approach provides a robust methodology for resolving apparent conflicts in experimental data and developing a more nuanced understanding of R. capsulatus atpE function in different contexts.

How is research on R. capsulatus atpE contributing to the development of novel bioenergetic systems?

Research on Rhodobacter capsulatus ATP synthase subunit c (atpE) is driving significant advances in bioenergetic systems engineering, with implications spanning fundamental science to applied biotechnology. The unique properties of this protein are being leveraged in several innovative directions:

Biomimetic Energy Conversion Systems:

  • R. capsulatus atpE's efficiency in coupling proton movement to rotary motion is inspiring synthetic nanomotors

  • Researchers are developing artificial membranes incorporating recombinant atpE to create biocompatible power generators

  • The protein's structure provides a template for designing synthetic molecules that can convert ion gradients to mechanical work with high efficiency

Photosynthetic Biohybrid Technologies:

  • The integration of R. capsulatus atpE into artificial systems is enabling the development of light-harvesting devices

  • Studies of atpE's function in the context of photosynthetic energy conversion inform the design of systems that directly convert light energy to chemical energy

  • The unique adaptation of ATP synthase to photosynthetic conditions in R. capsulatus provides insights for optimizing efficiency in artificial photosynthesis

Bioelectronic Interfaces:

  • AtpE-based systems are being explored for creating bio-electronic interfaces that can convert biological signals to electrical outputs

  • The protein's natural function in transmembrane charge movement is applicable to biosensor development

  • Research on oriented assembly of c-rings in artificial membranes is advancing bioelectronic device fabrication

Methodological Advancements:
Recent research has established protocols for:

  • Expression and purification of functional recombinant atpE protein

  • Site-specific modification with minimal impact on function

  • Integration into various membrane mimetics for functional studies

  • Application of the gene transfer agent transduction combined with conjugation for sophisticated genetic manipulation

These approaches collectively demonstrate how fundamental research on R. capsulatus atpE is transcending basic science to enable practical applications in sustainable energy technology and biomedical devices, with continued advances expected as structural and functional characterization becomes more refined.

What are the most promising directions for future research on R. capsulatus ATP synthase subunit c?

Future research on Rhodobacter capsulatus ATP synthase subunit c (atpE) presents several promising directions that could significantly advance our understanding of bioenergetics and enable novel biotechnological applications. The following methodological approaches represent the most compelling avenues for investigation:

Structure-Function Relationships at Atomic Resolution

The determination of high-resolution structures of R. capsulatus ATP synthase, particularly focusing on the c-ring in different conformational states, will be crucial. This direction should employ:

  • Cryo-electron microscopy of intact ATP synthase complexes

  • X-ray crystallography of isolated c-rings

  • Integrative structural biology approaches combining multiple data sources

  • Molecular dynamics simulations to capture conformational transitions

Energetic Coupling Mechanisms

Detailed investigation of how proton translocation through the c-ring drives ATP synthesis requires:

  • Single-molecule studies tracking c-ring rotation in real-time

  • Correlation of rotation dynamics with proton movement and ATP production

  • Investigation of the unique adaptations that enable function across different metabolic modes in R. capsulatus

  • Comparative studies with c-subunits from non-photosynthetic bacteria to identify photosynthesis-specific features

Synthetic Biology Applications

The development of engineered ATP synthases with novel properties offers exciting possibilities:

  • Creation of hybrid systems incorporating components from different species

  • Engineering of c-rings with altered stoichiometry to modify the H⁺/ATP ratio

  • Development of ATP synthases responsive to different ions or environmental signals

  • Integration into artificial photosynthetic systems for sustainable energy production

Systems Biology Integration

Understanding atpE function in the broader cellular context requires:

Evolutionary and Comparative Studies

The unusual gene organization in photosynthetic bacteria like R. capsulatus raises important evolutionary questions:

  • Comparative genomic analysis across purple bacteria to trace the evolutionary history of split ATP synthase operons

  • Investigation of selective pressures that maintain this organization

  • Functional comparison of c-subunits across species with different metabolic capabilities

  • Exploration of horizontal gene transfer events that may have shaped ATP synthase evolution

These research directions collectively represent a comprehensive approach to advancing our understanding of this essential component of cellular energy metabolism while exploring its potential for biotechnological innovation.

What are common issues encountered when working with recombinant R. capsulatus atpE and how can they be resolved?

When working with recombinant Rhodobacter capsulatus ATP synthase subunit c (atpE), researchers frequently encounter several technical challenges. This comprehensive troubleshooting guide addresses common issues and provides methodological solutions based on empirical evidence:

Low Expression Yields

ProblemProbable CauseSolution
Poor protein expressionToxicity to host cellsUse C41/C43(DE3) E. coli strains specifically developed for toxic membrane proteins
Strong secondary structure in mRNAOptimize codon usage for E. coli; consider synthetic gene with optimized codons
Inefficient translation initiationRedesign ribosome binding site; ensure optimal spacing between RBS and start codon
Protein degradationProtease activityAdd protease inhibitor cocktail during all purification steps
Instability of expressed proteinLower induction temperature to 16-18°C and extend expression time

Solubilization and Purification Difficulties

ProblemProbable CauseSolution
Poor solubilizationIneffective detergentScreen detergents; try DDM, LDAO, or FC-12 at concentrations above CMC
Inadequate solubilization conditionsOptimize temperature, time, and detergent:protein ratio
Low purification yieldNon-specific binding to resinInclude 20-40 mM imidazole in binding buffer for His-tagged protein
Protein aggregationAdd glycerol (5-10%) and trehalose (6%) to all buffers
Impure final productInadequate washingImplement gradient washing with increasing imidazole concentrations
Co-purifying contaminantsAdd secondary purification step (ion exchange or size exclusion)

Functional Reconstitution Issues

ProblemProbable CauseSolution
Lack of functional activityImproper foldingVerify protein structure using circular dichroism
Detergent interferenceUse gentle detergent removal via Bio-Beads or dialysis
Suboptimal lipid compositionTest different lipid mixtures mimicking R. capsulatus membranes
Poor incorporation into liposomesUnfavorable protein:lipid ratioOptimize protein:lipid ratios (typically 1:50 to 1:200 w/w)
Inefficient reconstitution methodCompare detergent dilution vs. detergent removal approaches

Storage and Stability Problems

ProblemProbable CauseSolution
Loss of activity during storageFreeze-thaw damageAvoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as recommended
Protein aggregationStore as lyophilized powder or in solution with 50% glycerol
OxidationAdd reducing agents (DTT or TCEP) to storage buffer
Precipitation during handlingBuffer incompatibilityEnsure buffer pH is maintained at 8.0 as recommended
Detergent concentration below CMCMaintain detergent above CMC throughout all procedures

Following these methodological solutions can significantly improve the success rate when working with recombinant R. capsulatus atpE, enabling more productive research on this important membrane protein.

How can researchers validate the functional integrity of purified recombinant atpE protein?

Validating the functional integrity of purified recombinant Rhodobacter capsulatus ATP synthase subunit c (atpE) requires a multi-faceted approach that assesses both structural characteristics and functional properties. The following comprehensive methodology provides a systematic framework for verification:

Structural Validation Approaches

MethodInformation ObtainedExperimental Procedure
Circular Dichroism (CD) SpectroscopySecondary structure confirmation- Measure CD spectrum between 190-260 nm
- Compare α-helical content with predicted structure
- Verify thermal stability through temperature-dependent CD
Size Exclusion ChromatographyOligomeric state assessment- Run purified protein on calibrated SEC column
- Verify elution volume consistent with c-ring assembly
- Check for absence of aggregates
Dynamic Light ScatteringHomogeneity and aggregation state- Measure particle size distribution
- Confirm monodisperse preparation
- Monitor stability over time
Mass SpectrometryProtein integrity and modifications- Verify exact mass matches theoretical value
- Identify any post-translational modifications
- Confirm N-terminal processing if present

Functional Validation Approaches

MethodInformation ObtainedExperimental Procedure
Proton Translocation AssaysCore functional activity- Reconstitute atpE into liposomes
- Load liposomes with pH-sensitive fluorescent dye
- Measure fluorescence changes upon applying pH gradient
- Verify inhibition by specific ATP synthase inhibitors
Assembly with Other ATP Synthase SubunitsInteraction capability- Mix purified atpE with other F₀ components
- Assess complex formation via native PAGE or co-immunoprecipitation
- Verify specific binding through crosslinking studies
Electron MicroscopyRing formation validation- Negative staining EM to visualize c-rings
- Measure ring dimensions and subunit stoichiometry
- Compare with published structures from related organisms
Lipid Binding AssaysMembrane interaction properties- Measure binding to lipid vesicles using fluorescence assays
- Determine lipid preferences using competitive binding assays
- Assess changes in protein structure upon lipid binding

Integration Tests

MethodInformation ObtainedExperimental Procedure
Reconstitution with Complete F₁F₀Holistic functional assessment- Combine recombinant atpE with purified F₁ and other F₀ components
- Measure ATP synthesis or hydrolysis activity
- Verify coupling between proton movement and catalysis
Complementation StudiesIn vivo functionality- Use gene transfer agent transduction combined with conjugation method
- Introduce recombinant atpE to complement chromosomal deletions
- Assess restoration of growth phenotypes

Comparative Benchmarking

MethodInformation ObtainedExperimental Procedure
Structure-Based ComparisonConservation of critical features- Compare structural parameters with native protein
- Ensure key functional residues maintain proper orientation
- Verify detergent micelle size approximates native membrane environment
Activity NormalizationQuantitative functional assessment- Establish specific activity benchmarks
- Compare activity per mg protein with published values
- Determine efficiency relative to native enzyme

This comprehensive validation approach ensures that purified recombinant atpE protein maintains its structural integrity and functional capabilities, providing confidence in subsequent experimental applications and data interpretation.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.