Recombinant Rhodobacter sphaeroides ATP synthase subunit c (atpE)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Functional Role in ATP Synthase

Subunit c (atpE) is integral to the F₀ sector’s proton channel. Its roles include:

  • Proton Translocation: Coordinates with subunits a and b to facilitate proton movement, driving the rotation of the F₀-F₁ complex .

  • Lipid Binding: Interacts with membrane lipids to stabilize the complex’s structure .

  • Evolutionary Adaptation: In Rhodobacter species, ATP synthase subunits exhibit high conservation, reflecting their essential role in energy metabolism .

Production and Purification

The recombinant atpE is produced via bacterial expression systems:

ParameterDescriptionSource
Expression SystemE. coli with inducible promoters (e.g., T7 or trc)
PurificationHis-tag affinity chromatography followed by lyophilization
Storage-20°C/-80°C (lyophilized powder in Tris/PBS buffer with 6% trehalose)
ReconstitutionDeionized water (0.1–1.0 mg/mL) with 5–50% glycerol for stability

Comparative Analysis

Subunit c (atpE) shares functional homology with other F₀ subunits but differs in sequence and structure:

OrganismUniProt IDLengthKey DifferenceSource
Rhodobacter sphaeroidesQ3IZ1378 aaMembrane-anchored, lipid-binding motif
Mycobacterium lepraeP4582881 aaDistinct lipid-binding residues
SynechocystisSubunit ε (atpE) with divergent role

Challenges and Considerations

  • Strain Variability: Different Rhodobacter strains (e.g., ATCC 17025) yield atpE variants with distinct UniProt IDs (e.g., A4WNY7) .

  • Storage Sensitivity: Repeated freeze-thaw cycles degrade protein integrity .

  • Functional Context: Studies often omit this subunit’s role in quinol oxidation or electron transfer chains .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: We will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. However, if you have specific requirements for the format, please specify them in your order notes. We will accommodate your request if possible.
Lead Time
Delivery times may vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributors for specific delivery times.
Note: All of our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs by default. If you require dry ice shipping, please inform us in advance, as additional fees will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend centrifuging the vial briefly before opening to ensure the contents settle to the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%, which you can use as a reference.
Shelf Life
The shelf life is influenced by factors such as storage conditions, buffer ingredients, storage temperature, and the protein's inherent stability.
Generally, the shelf life of liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. The shelf life of lyophilized form is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquoting is necessary for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
We will determine the tag type during production. If you have a specific tag type in mind, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing the specified tag.
Synonyms
atpE; Rsph17025_0191; ATP synthase subunit c; ATP synthase F(0 sector subunit c; F-type ATPase subunit c; F-ATPase subunit c; Lipid-binding protein
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-78
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Rhodobacter sphaeroides (strain ATCC 17025 / ATH 2.4.3)
Target Names
atpE
Target Protein Sequence
MEGDIAEMGKFIGAGLATIGLGGAGIGVGHVAGNFLAGALRNPSAAPGQMANLFVGIAFA EALGIFSFLIALLLMFAV
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
F(1)F(0) ATP synthase is responsible for producing ATP from ADP in the presence of a proton or sodium gradient. F-type ATPases are composed of two structural domains: F(1), containing the extramembraneous catalytic core, and F(0), containing the membrane proton channel, connected by a central stalk and a peripheral stalk. During catalysis, ATP synthesis in the catalytic domain of F(1) is coupled to proton translocation through a rotary mechanism involving the central stalk subunits. As a key component of the F(0) channel, subunit c plays a direct role in proton translocation across the membrane. A homomeric c-ring, composed of 10-14 subunits, forms the central stalk rotor element along with the F(1) delta and epsilon subunits.
Database Links
Protein Families
ATPase C chain family
Subcellular Location
Cell inner membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the structure and function of ATP synthase subunit c (atpE) in Rhodobacter species?

ATP synthase subunit c (encoded by the atpE gene) is a critical component of the F0 sector of ATP synthase, the remarkable molecular motor responsible for ATP generation. Based on structural studies across bacterial species:

  • Subunit c forms an oligomeric ring (c-ring) in the membrane-embedded F0 sector

  • Each c subunit typically contains two transmembrane α-helices connected by a hydrophilic loop

  • The c-ring contains a conserved carboxyl group (usually Asp or Glu) essential for proton translocation

  • The rotation of the c-ring driven by proton flow through the F0 sector is mechanically coupled to conformational changes in the F1 sector that catalyze ATP synthesis

In bacteria like Rhodobacter, the c-ring typically consists of 10-15 c subunits, creating a proton channel that harnesses the proton motive force to drive ATP synthesis . This structure is part of the larger ATP synthase complex, which consists of two main subcomplexes: the hydrophilic F1, and the hydrophobic F0 .

How is the atpE gene organized in the genome of Rhodobacter species?

Based on research in the related species Rhodobacter capsulatus, ATP synthase genes in Rhodobacter species display a unique genomic organization:

  • The genes for the F1 sector (atpHAGDC) are organized in one operon, which has been cloned and sequenced

  • The genes for the F0 sector, which would include atpE (coding for subunit c), are located in a different region of the chromosome

  • This split operon organization is also observed in other photosynthetic bacteria like Rhodospirillum rubrum and Rhodopseudomonas blastica

This gene organization differs from many other bacteria where F0 and F1 genes are typically arranged in a single operon. The separate arrangement of these operons may reflect evolutionary adaptations specific to photosynthetic bacteria .

Why is ATP synthase essential for Rhodobacter species?

Research on Rhodobacter capsulatus has demonstrated the essential nature of ATP synthase for cellular viability:

  • Attempts to create viable ATP synthase deletion mutants were unsuccessful under multiple growth conditions (aerobic, photosynthetic, and anaerobic)

  • No growth was detected under pure fermentative conditions, even after prolonged incubation

  • Resistant colonies that appeared during selection were found to retain the original ATP synthase genes

This essentiality likely stems from ATP synthase's central role in cellular energy metabolism. In photosynthetic bacteria like Rhodobacter, ATP synthase is particularly crucial as it functions in both respiration and photosynthesis, making it indispensable for energy generation under various environmental conditions .

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant R. sphaeroides atpE?

When expressing hydrophobic membrane proteins like ATP synthase subunit c, several expression systems can be considered:

Table 1: Comparison of Expression Systems for Recombinant atpE

Expression SystemAdvantagesDisadvantagesRecommended Conditions
E. coli (C41/C43 strains)Reduced toxicity for membrane proteinsLower expression levels18-25°C induction, 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG
Cell-free systemDirect incorporation into membranes, avoids toxicityTechnically challengingSupplement with lipids/detergents
Homologous (Rhodobacter)Native folding environmentLess established protocolsPhotosynthetic or aerobic growth

For membrane proteins like atpE, expression often requires specialized approaches:

  • Use of C-terminal tags rather than N-terminal tags to minimize interference with membrane insertion

  • Codon optimization for the expression host

  • Careful control of expression levels to prevent toxicity

  • Inclusion of membrane-mimicking environments during expression

The choice of expression system should be guided by the downstream applications and the specific requirements for functional studies of the protein .

What purification strategies yield the highest purity of recombinant atpE protein?

Purification of highly hydrophobic membrane proteins like atpE requires specialized approaches:

Extraction and solubilization:

  • Optimize detergent selection (DDM, LDAO, or Triton X-100) based on stability and downstream applications

  • Consider detergent-to-protein ratios carefully to prevent aggregation

  • Include lipids during solubilization to maintain native-like environment

Purification workflow:

  • Affinity chromatography (if using tagged constructs)

  • Size exclusion chromatography to separate oligomeric states

  • Ion exchange chromatography for final polishing

Critical considerations:

  • Maintain strict temperature control throughout purification

  • Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation

  • Consider the functional reconstitution requirements early in purification design

The purity and functional state of the protein can be significantly affected by the purification approach, making optimization of these steps crucial for subsequent structural and functional studies .

How can the proper folding and oligomerization of recombinant atpE be verified?

Verifying the proper folding and oligomerization of ATP synthase subunit c is essential before proceeding with functional studies:

Structural verification methods:

  • Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to assess secondary structure (high α-helical content expected)

  • Blue-native PAGE to analyze oligomeric state of the c-ring

  • Chemical cross-linking followed by mass spectrometry to determine subunit interactions

Functional verification:

  • Reconstitution into liposomes and proton translocation assays

  • Patch-clamp techniques to measure ion channel activity

  • Assembly assays with other ATP synthase subunits

Recent research has shown that ATP synthase monomers tend to aggregate into ribbons of even-numbered oligomers and dimers in vivo, a process that shapes cristae membranes and provides physiological benefits. Oligomerization is critical for enhancing ATP synthase activity by establishing and preserving local proton charge and mitochondrial membrane potential .

How can site-directed mutagenesis be used to study the function of specific residues in atpE?

Site-directed mutagenesis is a powerful approach for investigating the structure-function relationship of ATP synthase subunit c:

Strategic targets for mutagenesis:

  • The conserved proton-binding carboxyl residue (essential for proton translocation)

  • Residues lining the proton translocation pathway

  • Residues at interfaces with other subunits

  • Residues involved in c-ring stability

Methodological approach:

  • Design mutations based on sequence conservation analysis and structural models

  • Create mutations in expression vectors using PCR-based methods

  • Express and purify mutant proteins using optimized protocols

  • Assess functional consequences through proton translocation and ATP synthesis assays

Challenge of essential gene mutation:
Since ATP synthase genes appear to be essential in Rhodobacter species, a specialized approach combining gene transfer agent (GTA) transduction with conjugation can be employed to introduce mutations in essential genes . This method involves:

  • Creating a complementing copy on a plasmid

  • Introducing the mutated gene into the host

  • Using GTA transduction to modify the chromosomal copy

This approach has been successfully used in R. capsulatus and represents an easy way to construct strains carrying mutations in indispensable genes .

What techniques can be used to study the proton channel function of assembled atpE subunits?

Investigating the proton channel function of ATP synthase subunit c requires specialized biophysical and biochemical approaches:

Reconstitution systems:

  • Liposome reconstitution with purified c-rings or whole ATP synthase

  • Planar lipid bilayers for electrical measurements

  • Nanodiscs for single-molecule studies

Functional assays:

  • pH-sensitive fluorescent probes to monitor proton movement

  • Patch-clamp electrophysiology to measure ion conductance

  • Membrane potential measurements using voltage-sensitive dyes

Advanced biophysical techniques:

  • Solid-state NMR to analyze proton binding sites

  • Time-resolved spectroscopy to track conformational changes

  • Single-molecule FRET to monitor structural dynamics

Recent research indicates that ATP synthase operates with remarkable efficiency (approximately 90%), with its electric field supporting proton movement and ATP formation beyond its basic catalytic role. Molecular electrostatic potential calculations have revealed that alterations in the electric field support proton movement and ATP formation .

How does inhibition of ATP synthase affect cellular physiology in Rhodobacter species?

Understanding ATP synthase inhibition provides insights into both basic biology and potential applications:

Physiological consequences of inhibition:

  • Disruption of energy metabolism

  • Changes in membrane potential

  • Potential induction of oxidative stress

  • Alterations in photosynthetic capacity (in photosynthetic bacteria)

Known inhibitory mechanisms:

  • Binding to the β subunit (as seen with Enterostatin, which binds to the β subunit and inhibits ATP synthesis)

  • Disruption of the proton channel

  • Interference with rotational coupling

Studies in other systems have shown that inhibiting ATP synthase can lead to elevated oxidative stress and calcium levels, ultimately resulting in cell death. In Rhodobacter species, where ATP synthase appears to be essential, inhibition would likely have severe consequences for cell viability across different growth conditions .

What are common challenges in expressing recombinant atpE and how can they be overcome?

Researchers working with recombinant ATP synthase subunit c frequently encounter several challenges:

Table 2: Troubleshooting Guide for atpE Expression and Purification

ChallengePossible CausesSolutionsVerification Methods
Low expression yieldProtein toxicity, poor codon usageUse C41/C43 strains, codon optimization, lower temperatureWestern blot, RT-PCR
Protein aggregationHydrophobicity, improper foldingAdd lipids during expression, use solubilizing tagsFractionation analysis
Degradation during purificationProteolytic sensitivityAdd protease inhibitors, reduce purification timeSDS-PAGE time course
Loss of activityDetergent-induced denaturationOptimize detergent type/concentration, include lipidsFunctional assays

Specialized strategies for membrane protein expression:

  • Co-expression with ATP synthase assembly factors

  • Fusion with solubility-enhancing tags that can be removed after purification

  • Cell-free expression systems with membrane mimetics

  • Careful optimization of induction and growth conditions

These approaches can significantly improve the yield and quality of recombinant atpE protein, enabling more robust downstream structural and functional studies .

How can researchers resolve contradictory data regarding atpE function?

When faced with contradictory findings about ATP synthase subunit c function:

Methodological analysis:

  • Examine differences in experimental conditions (pH, ionic strength, lipid composition)

  • Consider species-specific variations that might affect interpretation

  • Evaluate the reconstitution methods used (detergents vs. nanodiscs vs. native membranes)

Validation approaches:

  • Use multiple, orthogonal techniques to confirm key findings

  • Collaborate with specialists in complementary methods

  • Develop in vivo validation strategies for in vitro observations

Computational assessment:

  • Molecular dynamics simulations to test structural hypotheses

  • Bioinformatic analysis of sequence conservation to evaluate functional relevance

  • Modeling of energetics and kinetics to test mechanistic proposals

Resolving contradictions often requires integrating structural, functional, and computational approaches to develop a comprehensive model that accounts for apparently discrepant observations .

What are the best methods for studying interactions between atpE and other ATP synthase subunits?

Understanding the interactions between subunit c and other ATP synthase components is crucial for elucidating the complete mechanism:

In vitro interaction studies:

  • Cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) to identify interaction sites

  • Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to measure binding kinetics

  • Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) for thermodynamic parameters

Structural approaches:

  • Cryo-electron microscopy of reconstituted complexes

  • X-ray crystallography of subcomplexes

  • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to identify interaction interfaces

Functional interaction analysis:

  • Suppressor mutation analysis to identify compensatory mutations

  • Genetic complementation studies with chimeric subunits

  • FRET-based assays for monitoring dynamic interactions

Recent studies have shown that oligomerization of ATP synthase is critical for enhancing its activity by establishing and preserving the local proton charge and mitochondrial membrane potential. Understanding these interactions provides insights into the structural basis of ATP synthase function and regulation .

What are emerging research directions for ATP synthase subunit c studies?

Current developments and future opportunities in ATP synthase subunit c research include:

  • Structural determination of species-specific c-ring arrangements and their functional implications

  • Investigation of post-translational modifications affecting assembly and function

  • Development of specific inhibitors targeting the c subunit for potential antimicrobial applications

  • Exploration of the relationship between c-ring stoichiometry and bioenergetic efficiency

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.