Recombinant Rhodopirellula baltica 30S ribosomal protein S16 (rpsP)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and serves as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the protein's inherent stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
rpsP; RB1282430S ribosomal protein S16
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-146
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Rhodopirellula baltica (strain DSM 10527 / NCIMB 13988 / SH1)
Target Names
rpsP
Target Protein Sequence
MAVRIRMKKM GRTHRPFFRV CAVDQRNPRD GRVIEELGTY DPMCPETDAR TTLKADRVDY WIGVGAQPSD KVAVLIKKYG TDGSHLEAQK AAVERLGRRK DYTPPPEAPA PKAAPVAEAP AEEAPAEEPA AEASTDDAPA AEATTE
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is the biological function of 30S ribosomal protein S16 (rpsP) in Rhodopirellula baltica?

Rhodopirellula baltica 30S ribosomal protein S16 (rpsP) functions as a probable component of the 30S ribosomal subunit. As a member of the bacterial ribosomal protein bS16 family, it plays a crucial role in ribosome assembly and protein translation machinery . The protein likely contributes to the structural integrity of the small ribosomal subunit and participates in the binding of mRNA during translation initiation.

Functional analysis indicates that rpsP interacts with multiple ribosomal proteins in R. baltica, forming an intricate network essential for ribosome biogenesis. Sequence analysis has confirmed its homology with S16 proteins from other organisms, including Arabidopsis, with database hits showing significant similarity (E-values ranging from 3e-15 to 1e-13) .

How does rpsP integrate into the ribosomal assembly pathway of Rhodopirellula baltica?

The rpsP protein likely participates in the early to mid-stages of 30S ribosomal subunit assembly in R. baltica. Similar to other bacterial S16 proteins, it probably binds directly to 16S ribosomal RNA and helps establish the proper conformational structure required for subsequent protein incorporation. The assembly pathway follows a hierarchical pattern where rpsP binding may facilitate the recruitment of other ribosomal proteins.

By examining the interaction network data from STRING database analysis, we can observe that rpsP has high confidence interaction scores with multiple ribosomal proteins, including rpsO (S15, score 0.989), rpsT (S20, score 0.990), and rpsU (S21, score 0.990) . These strong correlations suggest coordinated expression and functional interdependence during ribosome assembly.

What genomic context surrounds the rpsP gene in Rhodopirellula baltica?

The rpsP gene in R. baltica exists within a genomic neighborhood that reflects its role in translation and protein synthesis. Unlike many bacteria that organize ribosomal proteins in operons, R. baltica shows a distinctive genomic arrangement due to the scarcity of operon structures in its genome . This genomic organization may be related to the organism's unique regulatory mechanisms that differ from those of other bacteria with large genomes.

R. baltica possesses a large genome (7.15 Mb) with unique regulatory strategies, where only 2.4% (174) of all genes are predicted to encode transcriptional regulators . This contrasts with the general bacterial trend where the proportion of genes encoding transcriptional regulators increases with genome size. Instead, R. baltica demonstrates a preference for environmental sensing through two-component systems (66) and a high number of sigma factors (49) .

What expression patterns does rpsP exhibit throughout the Rhodopirellula baltica life cycle?

The expression of rpsP in R. baltica follows a dynamic pattern that corresponds to the organism's complex life cycle. R. baltica displays distinct morphotypes including swarmer cells, budding cells, and rosette formations at different growth phases . Transcriptomic studies reveal that genes associated with translation and protein synthesis, including ribosomal proteins like rpsP, show differential regulation throughout these phases.

During early exponential growth (dominated by swarmer and budding cells), genes related to protein synthesis, including ribosomal proteins, typically show higher expression. As the culture transitions to the stationary phase (dominated by rosette formations), these genes often become downregulated . This pattern aligns with the general bacterial strategy of conserving energy during nutrient limitation by reducing the energetically expensive process of ribosome synthesis.

How can recombinant rpsP be effectively expressed and purified for structural studies?

For expression and purification of recombinant R. baltica rpsP, researchers should consider the following methodological approach:

  • Gene cloning strategy: The rpsP gene (approximately 270 bp based on homology with other bacterial S16 proteins) should be PCR-amplified from R. baltica genomic DNA using primers that incorporate appropriate restriction sites for cloning into an expression vector.

  • Expression system selection: E. coli BL21(DE3) provides an efficient expression system for ribosomal proteins. The pET system with a His-tag or other affinity tag facilitates purification. Consider codon optimization for E. coli if expression levels are low.

  • Purification protocol:

    • Lyse cells using sonication in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, and 1 mM PMSF

    • Purify using Ni-NTA chromatography for His-tagged protein

    • Apply size exclusion chromatography for final purification

    • Consider RNA removal steps, as ribosomal proteins naturally bind RNA

  • Quality assessment: Verify purity using SDS-PAGE and identify the protein by mass spectrometry. Circular dichroism spectroscopy can provide insights into proper folding.

What are the key challenges in generating site-directed mutations in rpsP for functional studies?

Generating site-directed mutations in rpsP presents several challenges that researchers should address through careful experimental design:

  • Identification of critical residues: Comparative sequence analysis with S16 proteins from other organisms is essential for identifying conserved residues likely involved in RNA binding or protein-protein interactions.

  • Mutagenesis strategy: QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis or overlap extension PCR are appropriate methods. Design primers carefully to avoid off-target effects.

  • Functional consequences: Mutations may affect protein stability, RNA binding, or interactions with other ribosomal components. Develop appropriate functional assays, such as in vitro translation systems or ribosome assembly assays, to evaluate these effects.

  • Complementation testing: For validation, design complementation experiments in model organisms to test if mutant variants can restore function in S16-depleted strains.

How might the unique characteristics of Planctomycetes influence the structure and function of rpsP compared to other bacterial phyla?

The Planctomycetes phylum, to which R. baltica belongs, possesses several unique cellular characteristics that may influence rpsP structure and function:

  • Intracellular compartmentalization: R. baltica exhibits unusual cellular compartmentalization , which might affect the spatial organization of protein synthesis machinery. This could potentially result in distinctive features of ribosomal proteins, including rpsP, to accommodate these compartmentalized structures.

  • Peptidoglycan-free cell walls: R. baltica has proteinaceous cell walls lacking peptidoglycan , which may correlate with adaptations in the translation machinery to support the synthesis of alternative cell wall components. Ribosomal proteins like rpsP might have evolved specialized interactions to facilitate this process.

  • Genomic adaptations: The large genome size (7.15 Mb) and unique transcriptional regulatory patterns of R. baltica suggest potential adaptations in the translation apparatus. rpsP might have evolved specialized features to integrate with these regulatory networks.

  • Ecological adaptations: As a marine organism, R. baltica faces osmotic challenges. Ribosomal proteins, including rpsP, may have adapted to function optimally under varying salt concentrations. This hypothesis is supported by the observed salt resistance of R. baltica in cultivation studies .

Comparative structural analysis between rpsP from R. baltica and other bacterial phyla would help identify unique structural features that might reflect these physiological adaptations.

What methodological approaches can be used to investigate the interaction network of rpsP within the R. baltica ribosome?

Several advanced methodological approaches can elucidate the interaction network of rpsP:

  • Cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM):

    • Resolution: Can achieve near-atomic resolution (2-3 Å)

    • Sample preparation: Purify intact ribosomes from R. baltica cultures

    • Analysis: Determine the position of rpsP within the ribosome architecture and identify interaction partners

    • Advantages: Visualizes native state without crystallization

  • Crosslinking mass spectrometry (XL-MS):

    • Methodology: Treat purified ribosomes with crosslinking agents (e.g., BS3, DSS)

    • Analysis: Digest crosslinked samples and identify crosslinked peptides by mass spectrometry

    • Output: Generates distance constraints between interacting proteins

    • Integration: Combine with molecular modeling to generate interaction models

  • Ribosome profiling:

    • Experimental design: Generate rpsP variants with mutations at key residues

    • Analysis: Compare ribosome profiling data between wild-type and mutant strains

    • Output: Identifies changes in translation efficiency and ribosome positioning

    • Integration: Correlate with structural data to understand functional consequences

  • Quantitative proteomics:

    • Methodology: SILAC or TMT labeling of wild-type vs. rpsP-depleted cells

    • Analysis: Identify proteins with altered abundance or phosphorylation

    • Output: Reveals broader impacts of rpsP function on cellular proteostasis

These complementary approaches would provide a comprehensive understanding of rpsP's role within the ribosomal complex.

How can reference-query pyrosequencing (RQPS) be adapted for studying recombinant rpsP variants?

Reference-query pyrosequencing (RQPS) offers a valuable approach for studying recombinant rpsP variants through the following methodological adaptations:

  • Probe design for rpsP variants:

    • Design pyrosequencing primers targeting regions with single nucleotide variations (SNVs) between wild-type and recombinant rpsP

    • Include internal controls with known copy numbers for quantification

    • Validate primer specificity using synthetic templates

  • Application to homologous recombination screening:

    • Design RQPS probes spanning the integration junctions of recombinant rpsP constructs

    • Quantify the ratio between wild-type and recombinant sequences

    • Establish threshold values for identifying positive recombinants

  • Copy number determination:

    • Use RQPS to precisely quantify the copy number of integrated rpsP variants

    • Establish standard curves using reference samples with known copy numbers

    • Apply to distinguish between single and multiple integration events

  • Experimental protocol optimization:

    • Sample preparation: Extract genomic DNA using standardized protocols

    • PCR amplification: 35-40 cycles with high-fidelity polymerase

    • Pyrosequencing: Use Qiagen PyroMark or equivalent system

    • Data analysis: Apply statistical methods to determine significance thresholds

This approach offers significant advantages over traditional PCR screening methods, including higher throughput, greater sensitivity for detecting recombination events, and the ability to quantify copy number variations .

What is the optimal strategy for designing expression constructs for recombinant R. baltica rpsP?

The optimal strategy for designing expression constructs for recombinant R. baltica rpsP should consider several critical factors:

Table 1. Comparison of Expression Systems for Recombinant rpsP Production

Expression SystemAdvantagesDisadvantagesRecommended Applications
E. coli pETHigh yield; Tight regulation; Multiple tag optionsPotential inclusion body formation; May require refoldingStructural studies; Biochemical assays
E. coli SUMOEnhanced solubility; Precise tag removalModerately complex purificationFunctional studies requiring native N-terminus
Cell-freeRapid expression; Accommodates toxic proteinsLow yield; High costPreliminary functional screening; RNA binding studies
Yeast expressionPost-translational modifications; Secretion optionsLower yield; Longer expression timeComplex functional studies requiring eukaryotic environment

For most applications, the following construct design is recommended:

  • Vector selection: pET-28a(+) providing kanamycin resistance and T7 promoter control

  • Affinity tag: N-terminal 6xHis tag with thrombin cleavage site

  • Codon optimization: Adjust for E. coli codon usage while preserving critical structural elements

  • Flanking sequences: Include 15-20 bp flexible linkers between tag and protein sequence

  • Expression optimization: Include translation enhancers such as Shine-Dalgarno sequence optimization

For functional studies requiring precise native N-terminus, consider a SUMO fusion strategy that allows precise tag removal without leaving additional amino acids.

What are the critical parameters for assessing the structural integrity of purified recombinant rpsP?

The structural integrity of purified recombinant rpsP should be assessed using multiple complementary approaches:

  • Purity assessment:

    • SDS-PAGE: Should show >95% purity with a single band at expected molecular weight (~10 kDa)

    • Size-exclusion chromatography: Single symmetrical peak indicating monodisperse preparation

    • Mass spectrometry: Confirm exact molecular weight and sequence coverage

  • Folding analysis:

    • Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy: Compare spectra with published data for bacterial S16 proteins

    • Intrinsic fluorescence: Monitor tryptophan/tyrosine emission spectra as indicators of tertiary structure

    • Thermal shift assays: Determine melting temperature (Tm) as a stability parameter

  • Functional validation:

    • RNA binding assays: Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) with 16S rRNA fragments

    • Ribosome incorporation: In vitro reconstitution assays with 30S ribosomal components

    • Activity tests: Complement S16-deficient strains to verify functionality

  • Aggregation monitoring:

    • Dynamic light scattering (DLS): Verify monodispersity and absence of aggregates

    • Analytical ultracentrifugation: Determine sedimentation coefficient and oligomerization state

These parameters should be systematically evaluated and documented to ensure that structural studies or functional assays utilize properly folded, biologically relevant protein.

How can researchers design experiments to investigate the role of rpsP in R. baltica's adaptation to different environmental conditions?

To investigate the role of rpsP in R. baltica's environmental adaptations, researchers should implement the following experimental design approach:

  • Transcriptomic analysis across environmental gradients:

    • Culture R. baltica under varying conditions (salinity, temperature, pH)

    • Perform RNA-seq to quantify rpsP expression relative to other ribosomal proteins

    • Identify condition-specific expression patterns and co-regulated genes

    • Correlate expression with growth rates and cell morphology changes

  • Complementation studies with variant rpsP:

    • Generate a library of rpsP variants from related species adapted to different environments

    • Express these variants in R. baltica or model organisms with depleted S16

    • Assess growth and ribosome function under challenging conditions

    • Identify variants that confer enhanced fitness under specific stressors

  • Ribosome profiling under stress conditions:

    • Apply ribosome profiling to R. baltica grown under optimal vs. stress conditions

    • Analyze changes in translation efficiency of stress-response genes

    • Correlate with potential structural changes in the ribosome

    • Identify stress-specific signatures in ribosome-mRNA interactions

  • Structural adaptations analysis:

    • Perform comparative structural analyses of rpsP under different conditions

    • Use hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify regions with altered dynamics

    • Correlate structural changes with functional outcomes

    • Model the impact of environmental factors on rpsP-RNA interactions

This multi-faceted approach will provide insights into how rpsP contributes to R. baltica's remarkable adaptability across different environmental conditions, particularly its marine habitat with fluctuating salt concentrations .

What emerging technologies could advance our understanding of rpsP function in R. baltica ribosomes?

Several emerging technologies hold promise for advancing our understanding of rpsP function in R. baltica ribosomes:

  • Cryo-electron tomography (Cryo-ET):

    • Application: Visualize ribosomes in their native cellular context within R. baltica cells

    • Advantages: Preserves spatial relationships between ribosomes and other cellular components

    • Future potential: Integration with correlative light microscopy to track specific ribosome populations

  • AlphaFold2 and deep learning structural prediction:

    • Application: Generate accurate structural models of rpsP and its interactions

    • Advantages: Rapidly test structural hypotheses without crystallization challenges

    • Future potential: Integrate with molecular dynamics to predict environmental adaptation mechanisms

  • CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) in Planctomycetes:

    • Application: Develop tunable knockdown systems for rpsP to study partial loss of function

    • Advantages: More nuanced phenotypic analysis than complete knockouts

    • Future potential: Combine with ribosome profiling for comprehensive translational landscape analysis

  • Single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET):

    • Application: Monitor real-time conformational changes in rpsP during ribosome assembly

    • Advantages: Captures dynamic processes impossible to observe with static structural methods

    • Future potential: Integrated with in vitro translation systems to correlate with functional outputs

  • Ribosome engineering with non-canonical amino acids:

    • Application: Incorporate photo-crosslinkable or fluorescent amino acids into rpsP

    • Advantages: Precise mapping of interaction interfaces and conformational changes

    • Future potential: Create ribosomes with enhanced properties for biotechnological applications

These technologies, particularly when used in combination, will provide unprecedented insights into the structural dynamics and functional roles of rpsP in the unique cellular context of R. baltica.

How might comparative genomics inform the evolutionary trajectory of rpsP in Planctomycetes?

Comparative genomics approaches can reveal important insights about the evolutionary trajectory of rpsP in Planctomycetes through the following methodological framework:

  • Phylogenomic analysis:

    • Construct phylogenetic trees using rpsP sequences from diverse bacterial phyla

    • Apply maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods to resolve evolutionary relationships

    • Identify Planctomycetes-specific clades and potential horizontal gene transfer events

    • Correlate with 16S rRNA phylogeny to identify congruence or discordance

  • Selection pressure analysis:

    • Calculate dN/dS ratios across the rpsP sequence in Planctomycetes lineages

    • Identify sites under positive, negative, or relaxed selection

    • Compare selection patterns with structural elements and functional domains

    • Correlate selection patterns with ecological niches of different Planctomycetes

  • Synteny and genome context analysis:

    • Examine the genomic neighborhood of rpsP across Planctomycetes

    • Identify conserved gene clusters and potential operon structures

    • Compare with other bacterial phyla to identify unique arrangements

    • Correlate genomic context with regulatory mechanisms

  • Structural motif conservation:

    • Map sequence conservation onto predicted structural models

    • Identify Planctomycetes-specific structural features

    • Correlate with unique cellular features like compartmentalization

    • Predict functional consequences of structural adaptations

This comprehensive approach would reveal whether rpsP has undergone specific adaptations in Planctomycetes related to their unique cellular features, such as intracellular compartmentalization and peptidoglycan-free cell walls , providing insights into the co-evolution of cellular structures and the protein synthesis machinery.

What are the potential biotechnological applications of recombinant R. baltica rpsP?

Recombinant R. baltica rpsP offers several promising biotechnological applications based on its unique properties and the distinctive characteristics of Planctomycetes:

  • Enhanced protein expression systems:

    • Exploit R. baltica's salt tolerance mechanisms to develop protein expression systems for high-salt environments

    • Engineer chimeric ribosomes incorporating rpsP for expression of difficult proteins

    • Develop cell-free translation systems optimized for high-yield production of membrane proteins

  • Antibiotic development:

    • Utilize structural differences between R. baltica rpsP and pathogenic bacterial homologs

    • Design selective inhibitors targeting pathogen-specific features of S16

    • Screen for compounds that disrupt specific rpsP-rRNA interactions in pathogens but not in humans

  • Biosensor development:

    • Exploit the RNA-binding properties of rpsP to develop biosensors for environmental RNA detection

    • Design FRET-based systems using tagged rpsP for monitoring ribosome assembly

    • Create whole-cell biosensors using rpsP promoter regions responsive to environmental conditions

  • Bioremediation applications:

    • Leverage R. baltica's marine adaptation and sessile lifestyle for bioremediation technologies

    • Develop immobilized cell systems using rpsP fusion proteins for anchoring

    • Engineer strain improvements by modifying translation efficiency through rpsP variants

These applications align with the observation that R. baltica harbors numerous genes with potential biotechnological applications , including those conferring salt resistance and enabling a sessile lifestyle, which are desirable for industrial bioprocesses.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.